ML17156A045

2016 Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Initial Licensed Operator Examination ES-301-4

ML17156A045
Person / Time
Site:	Monticello
Issue date:	05/31/2017
From:	David Reeser NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Shared Package
ML15274A423	List: ML17142A415 ML17142A423 ML17142A425 ML17142A427 ML17142A429 ML17142A430 ML17156A043 ML17156A045
References
Download: ML17156A045 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Monticello Date of Exam: November 2016 Scenario Numbers: 1-4 Operating Test No: 2016-301 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, t2..

rJfll ~

but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

~

re?,

3.

Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

.z..

't~

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

~ ~

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete cJz..

~

evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

~~

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

~

acg

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional

~

~

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other

~

..~

scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the

~

~ ~

form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable

~

~

rating factors. (Competency Rating factors a~. described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified tt:-

~

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

~

• V ' p~

Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2)

J./. I ( I I

':f_

-~

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 3 I 3 I 'Z...

~

~

3.

Major transients (1-2)

I I I I

c:z...

~~

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 I 1-I

'Z.

?t£3

5.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) l I 0 I 0

~

~

6.

EOP based Critical tasks (2-3)

Z I Z. I l~ ~

.... ~ t&

NOTE:. The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

'X r>< )<

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.