ML16342B892

Concludes Response to Generic Ltr 91-13, Request for Info Re Resolution of Generic Issue 130, Essential Svc Water Sys Failures at Multi-Unit Sites, Per 10CFR50.54(f), Acceptable

ML16342B892
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	06/17/1992
From:	Rood H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Rueger G PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
References
REF-GTECI-130, REF-GTECI-NI, TASK-130, TASK-OR GL-91-13, TAC-M81177, TAC-M81178, NUDOCS 9206250113
Download: ML16342B892 (6)

Text

3une i7, 1992 Docket Nos.

50-275 and 50-323 Hr. Gregory H. Rueger

,- Senior Vice President and General Manager Nuclear Power Generation Business Unit Pacific Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street',,

Room 1451 San Franci sco, Cal iforni a 94106

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE

TO GENERIC LETTER 91-13, "REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO THE RESOLUTION OF GENERIC ISSUE 130,

'ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER SYSTEM FAILURES AT MULTI-UNITSITES,'URSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)"

(TAC NOS.

M81177 AND H81178)

On September 16,

1991, the NRC issued Generic Letter (GL) 91-13.

The GL, which contained the staff resolution of Generic Issue 130, required that the licensee of each applicable facility review the technical specification (TS) and procedure improvements recommended by the GL, and review the applicability and safety significance of these improvements.

Each licensee was requested to state whether the proposed TS changes are applicable to its facility, and whether or not it will commit to make the recommended improvements.

By letter dated March 17, 1992 (DCL-92-061), you responded to the GL.

You indicated that because of plant-specific features, the technical specification changes and some of the procedural improvements recommended by the GL are not required at Diablo Canyon.

The staff has reviewed your response and finds that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-13.

This completes our review of this issue and closes TAC Nos.

H81177 and H81178.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.

Sincerely, cc:

See next page Original signed bp Harry Rood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate V

Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation DISTRIBUTION t Docket File

~

NRC 5 Local PDRs PDV Reading OFC PDV/LA NAME DFoste DATE 06/t't/92 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY ACRS (10)

PDV p/f HGamberoni

KPerkins, RV WLefave

PHorrill, RV BBoger HRood HVirgilio Tguay DFoster OGC PDV/PH

/D HRood uay 06/( //92 6/w/92 tl Document Name:

DCH81177.LTR 920b250113 05000275 920b17 PDR ': ~D pDR p

htImg FI p< QBEIIIIi:R I~9

I l

I l

I c

i 1

if H

pS RECy

~

~4 I

C O

4 ~

9

()w

++*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 dune 17, 1992 Docket Nos.

50-275 and 50-323 Hr. Gregory H. Rueger Senior Vice President and General Manager Nuclear Power Generation Business Unit Pacific -Gas and Electric Company 77 Beale Street, Room 1451 San Francisco, California 94106

SUBJECT:

RESPONSE

TO GENERIC LETTER 91-13, "REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO THE RESOLUTION OF GENERIC ISSUE 130,

'ESSENTIAL SERVICE WATER SYSTEM FAILURES AT MULTI-UNITSITES,'URSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)"

(TAC NOS.

M81177 AND M81178)

=-On September 16, 1991, the NRC issued Generic Letter (GL) 91-13.

The GL, which contained the staff resolution of Generic Issue 130, required that the licensee of each applicable facility review the technical specification (TS) and procedure improvements recommended by the GL, and review the applicability and safety significance of these improvements.

Each licensee was requested to state whether the proposed TS changes are applicable to its facility, and whether or not it will commit to make the recommended improvements.

By letter dated March 17, 1992 (DCL-92-061), you responded to the GL.

You indicated that because of plant-specific features, the technical specification changes and some of the procedural improvements recommended by the GL are not required at Diablo Canyon.

The staff has reviewed your response and finds that it meets the reporting requirements set forth in GL 91-13.

This completes our review of this issue and closes TAC Nos.

H81177 and H81178.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.

Sincerely, cc:

See next page Harry Ro

, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate V

Division of Reactor Projects III/IV/V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

0 S

I 1

i>

Mr. Gregory H. Rueger Pacific Gas and Electric Company Diablo Canyon CC:

NRC Resident Inspector

'iablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. 0.

Box 369 Avila Beach, California 93424 Dr. Richard Ferguson, Energy Chair Sierra Club California 6715 Rocky Canyon

Creston, California 93432 Hs.

Sandra A. Silver Mothers for Peace 660 Granite Creek Road Santa Cruz, California 95065 Hs. Jacquelyn C. Wheeler 3303 Barranca Court San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Managing Editor The County Telegram Tribune 1321 Johnson Avenue P. 0.

Box 112 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 Chairman San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors Room 370 County Government Center San Luis Obispo, California 93408 Christopher J.

Warner, Esq.

Pacific Gas E Electric Company Post Office Box 7442 San Francisco, California 94120 Hr. Hank Kocol Radiologic Health Branch State Department of Health Services Post Office Box 942732 Sacramento, California 94234 Regional Administrator, Region V

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Hr. Peter H. Kaufman Deputy Attorney General State of California 110 West A Street, Suite 700 San Diego, California 92101 Hs.

Nancy Culver 192 Luneta Street San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Michael H. Strumwasser, Esq.

Special Assistant Attorney General State of California Department of Justice 3580 Wilshire Boulevard, Room 800 Los Angeles, California 90010

f I

I

~t