ML16106A034
| ML16106A034 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2016 |
| From: | Kennedy M, Lawrence Mcdade, Richard Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01, RAS 51066 | |
| Download: ML16106A034 (6) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01 April 15, 2016 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention)
I.
Background
On March 8, 2016, Riverkeeper moved for the admission of a new environmental contention, RK-EC-11.1 In its motion, Riverkeeper stated that it seeks admission of a single place-holder contention challenging the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) reliance, in proposing to re-license Indian Point Units 2 and 3, on the Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rule... and the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (Continued Storage Rule and GEIS).2 Riverkeeper specified that while
[it] seeks admission of its contention, it does not seek to litigate the substantive content of the contention in an adjudicatory hearing, as it has already raised its concerns about the regulation at issue in comments on draft versions of those documents, which the NRC has 1 Riverkeepers Request for Admission of New Environmental Contention (Mar. 8, 2016)
[hereinafter Riverkeeper Motion].
2 Id. at 1.
already rejected or disregarded.3 The Continued Storage Rule and GEIS are currently on appeal to the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.4 The NRC Staff and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) both oppose Riverkeepers request, 5 arguing that the new contention is outside the scope of this individual licensing proceeding because it challenges an agency regulation and is therefore inadmissible.6 The Staff and Entergy both also contend that the motion is untimely.7 The NRC Staff further challenge the motion as failing to raise a genuine dispute of a material issue of fact or law.8 II.
Board Ruling The Board views RK-EC-11 as an attack on the agencys Continued Storage Rule9 and GEIS.10 The Commission has previously denied as inadmissible substantially similar challenges 3 Id.
4 Id. at 2 (citing Beyond Nuclear v. NRC, Docket No. 14-1216 (filed Oct. 29, 2014)). This case was consolidated with several similar appeals and is now captioned New York et al. v. NRC, Docket Nos. 14-1210, 14-1212, 14-1216, and 14-1217 (Consolidated) (filed Oct. 31, 2014).
Riverkeeper Motion at 2, note 1. The case has been argued and the parties await a decision.
Id. at 5.
5 See NRC Staffs Answer to Riverkeepers Request for Admission of New Environmental Contention (Contention RK-EC-11) (Apr. 4, 2016) [hereinafter NRC Answer]; Entergys Opposition to Riverkeepers Proposed Placeholder Contention RK-EC-11 Concerning the Continued Storage Rule (Apr. 4, 2016) [hereinafter Entergy Answer].
6 NRC Answer at 15; Entergy Answer at 6-7 (citing Union Elec. Co. (Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1) CLI-15-11, 81 NRC 546, 549 (2015)). See also 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f)(1)(iii)
(providing that an admissible contention must [d]emonstrate that the issue raised in the contention is within the scope of the proceeding).
7 NRC Answer at 19; Entergy Answer at 9. In its motion, Riverkeeper argued that the filing was timely because its admissibility depends entirely on an event that will occur in the future, namely the ruling on the appeal before the DC Circuit. Riverkeeper Motion at 8.
8 See Staff Answer at 18-19.
9 See 79 Fed. Reg. 56,238 (Sept. 19, 2014).
10 See Waste Confidence Directorate, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, in numerous separate operating license proceedings for this same reason.11 Accordingly, we find that pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f)(1)(iii), Riverkeepers proposed contention, a direct challenge to an NRC regulation, is outside the scope of this individual license renewal proceeding for Indian Point Units 2 and 3 and is therefore inadmissible. The motion is denied.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Dr. Richard E. Wardwell ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Dr. Michael F. Kennedy ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland April 15, 2016 NUREG-2157 (Sept. 2014) (Vol. 1, ADAMS Accession No. 14196A105) (Vol. 2, ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A107).
11 See Callaway, CLI-15-11, 81 NRC at 549 (2015); DTE Elec. Co. (Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3), CLI-15-12, 81 NRC 551, 553-54 (2015); Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (William States Lee III Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), CLI-15-15, 81 NRC 803, 804 (2015)).
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
)
)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
)
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR
)
and 50-286-LR (Indian Point Nuclear Generating,
)
Units 2 and 3)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop O-7H4M Washington, DC 20555-0001 ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 hearingdocket@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Administrative Judge lawrence.mcdade@nrc.gov Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge richard.wardwell@nrc.gov Michael F. Kennedy Administrative Judge michael.kennedy@nrc.gov Alana Wase, Law Clerk alana.wase@nrc.gov Julie Reynolds-Engel, Law Clerk Julie.Reynolds-Engel@nrc.gov Catherine L. Scott, Esq.
Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.
David E. Roth, Esq.
Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq.
Anita Ghosh, Esq.
Christina England, Esq.
Catherine E. Kanatas, Esq.
Joseph Lindell, Esq.
John Tibbetts, Paralegal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 catherine.scott@nrc.gov; beth.mizuno@nrc.gov; sherwin.turk@nrc.gov; brian.harris.@nrc.gov; david.roth@nrc.gov; anita.ghosh@nrc.gov; christina.england@nrc.gov; catherine.kanatas@nrc.gov; joseph.lindell@nrc.gov; john.tibbetts@nrc.gov OGC Mail Center OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov William B. Glew, Jr.
Organization: Entergy 440 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601 wglew@entergy.com
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention) 2 Elise N. Zoli, Esq.
Goodwin Proctor, LLP Exchange Place, 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109 ezoli@goodwinprocter.com Daniel Riesel, Esq.
Victoria Shiah Treanor, Esq.
Adam Stolorow, Esq.
Natoya Duncan, Paralegal Counsel for Town of Cortlandt Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 driesel@sprlaw.com; vtreanor@sprlaw.com astolorow@sprlaw.com; nduncan@sprlaw.com Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
Martin J. ONeill, Esq.
Brooke McGlinn, Esq.
Grant Eskelsen, Esq.
Ryan Lighty, Esq.
Lesa G. Williams-Richardson, Legal Secretary Doris Calhoun, Legal Secretary Mary Freeze, Legal Secretary Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 ksutton@morganlewis.com martin.oneill@morganlewis.com bmcglinn@morganlewis.com grant.eskelsen@morganlewis.com rlighty@morganlewis.com lrichardson@morganlewis.com dcalhoun@morganlewis.com mfreeze@morganlewis.com Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney Office of Robert F. Meehan, Westchester County Attorney 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor White Plains, NY 10601 mjr1@westchestergov.com Matthew W. Swinehart, Esq.
Covington & Burling LLP 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 mswinehart@cov.com Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director Steven C. Filler Peter A. Gross Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
724 Wolcott Ave.
Beacon, NY 12508 mannajo@clearwater.org; stephenfiller@gmail.com; peter@clearwater.org Andrew Reid, Esq.
Organization: Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
Ved Nanda Center for International and Comparative Law 1075 Waite Drive Boulder, CO 80303 lawyerreid@gmail.com Richard Webster, Esq.
Public Justice, P.C.
For Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
1825 K Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 rwebster@publicjustice.net Michael J. Delaney, Esq.
Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs NYC Department of Environmental Protection 59-17 Junction Boulevard Flushing, NY 11373 mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov Robert D. Snook, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention) 3 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 robert.snook@po.state.ct.us David A. Repka, Esq.
Victoria Hsia, Esq.
Carlos L. Sisco, Paralegal Winston & Strawn 1701 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 drepka@winston.com vhsia@winston.com CSisco@winston.com Paul Gallay, Esq.
Deborah Brown Ramona Cearley, Secretary Riverkeeper, Inc.
20 Secor Road Ossining, NY 10562 pgallay@riverkeeper.org dbrown@riverkeeper.org rcearley@riverkeeper.org John J. Sipos, Esq.
Lisa S. Kwong, Esq.
Brian Lusignan, Esq.
Mihir Desai, Esq.
Assistant Attorneys General Teresa Manzi, Legal Assistant Siobhan Blank, Legal Assistant Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York The Capitol, State Street Albany, New York 12224 john.sipos@ag.ny.gov lisa.kwong@ag.ny.gov brian.lusignan@ag.ny.gov mihir.desai@ag.ny.gov teresa.manzi@ag.ny.gov siobhan.blank@ag.ny.gov Kathryn M. DeLuca, Esq.
Laura Heslin, Esq.
Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 kathryn.deluca@ag.ny.gov laura.heslin@ag.ny.gov Sean Murray, Mayor Kevin Hay, Village Administrator Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 smurray@villageofbuchanan.com administrator@villageofbuchanan.com
[Original signed by R. Giitter ]
Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 15th day of April, 2016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01 April 15, 2016 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention)
I.
Background
On March 8, 2016, Riverkeeper moved for the admission of a new environmental contention, RK-EC-11.1 In its motion, Riverkeeper stated that it seeks admission of a single place-holder contention challenging the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions (NRCs) reliance, in proposing to re-license Indian Point Units 2 and 3, on the Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel Rule... and the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel (Continued Storage Rule and GEIS).2 Riverkeeper specified that while
[it] seeks admission of its contention, it does not seek to litigate the substantive content of the contention in an adjudicatory hearing, as it has already raised its concerns about the regulation at issue in comments on draft versions of those documents, which the NRC has 1 Riverkeepers Request for Admission of New Environmental Contention (Mar. 8, 2016)
[hereinafter Riverkeeper Motion].
2 Id. at 1.
already rejected or disregarded.3 The Continued Storage Rule and GEIS are currently on appeal to the U.S Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.4 The NRC Staff and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) both oppose Riverkeepers request, 5 arguing that the new contention is outside the scope of this individual licensing proceeding because it challenges an agency regulation and is therefore inadmissible.6 The Staff and Entergy both also contend that the motion is untimely.7 The NRC Staff further challenge the motion as failing to raise a genuine dispute of a material issue of fact or law.8 II.
Board Ruling The Board views RK-EC-11 as an attack on the agencys Continued Storage Rule9 and GEIS.10 The Commission has previously denied as inadmissible substantially similar challenges 3 Id.
4 Id. at 2 (citing Beyond Nuclear v. NRC, Docket No. 14-1216 (filed Oct. 29, 2014)). This case was consolidated with several similar appeals and is now captioned New York et al. v. NRC, Docket Nos. 14-1210, 14-1212, 14-1216, and 14-1217 (Consolidated) (filed Oct. 31, 2014).
Riverkeeper Motion at 2, note 1. The case has been argued and the parties await a decision.
Id. at 5.
5 See NRC Staffs Answer to Riverkeepers Request for Admission of New Environmental Contention (Contention RK-EC-11) (Apr. 4, 2016) [hereinafter NRC Answer]; Entergys Opposition to Riverkeepers Proposed Placeholder Contention RK-EC-11 Concerning the Continued Storage Rule (Apr. 4, 2016) [hereinafter Entergy Answer].
6 NRC Answer at 15; Entergy Answer at 6-7 (citing Union Elec. Co. (Callaway Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1) CLI-15-11, 81 NRC 546, 549 (2015)). See also 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f)(1)(iii)
(providing that an admissible contention must [d]emonstrate that the issue raised in the contention is within the scope of the proceeding).
7 NRC Answer at 19; Entergy Answer at 9. In its motion, Riverkeeper argued that the filing was timely because its admissibility depends entirely on an event that will occur in the future, namely the ruling on the appeal before the DC Circuit. Riverkeeper Motion at 8.
8 See Staff Answer at 18-19.
9 See 79 Fed. Reg. 56,238 (Sept. 19, 2014).
10 See Waste Confidence Directorate, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, in numerous separate operating license proceedings for this same reason.11 Accordingly, we find that pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f)(1)(iii), Riverkeepers proposed contention, a direct challenge to an NRC regulation, is outside the scope of this individual license renewal proceeding for Indian Point Units 2 and 3 and is therefore inadmissible. The motion is denied.
It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Dr. Richard E. Wardwell ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Dr. Michael F. Kennedy ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland April 15, 2016 NUREG-2157 (Sept. 2014) (Vol. 1, ADAMS Accession No. 14196A105) (Vol. 2, ADAMS Accession No. ML14196A107).
11 See Callaway, CLI-15-11, 81 NRC at 549 (2015); DTE Elec. Co. (Fermi Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 3), CLI-15-12, 81 NRC 551, 553-54 (2015); Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (William States Lee III Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), CLI-15-15, 81 NRC 803, 804 (2015)).
/RA/
/RA/
/RA/
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
)
)
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
)
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR
)
and 50-286-LR (Indian Point Nuclear Generating,
)
Units 2 and 3)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop O-7H4M Washington, DC 20555-0001 ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 hearingdocket@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Lawrence G. McDade, Chair Administrative Judge lawrence.mcdade@nrc.gov Richard E. Wardwell Administrative Judge richard.wardwell@nrc.gov Michael F. Kennedy Administrative Judge michael.kennedy@nrc.gov Alana Wase, Law Clerk alana.wase@nrc.gov Julie Reynolds-Engel, Law Clerk Julie.Reynolds-Engel@nrc.gov Catherine L. Scott, Esq.
Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.
David E. Roth, Esq.
Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq.
Anita Ghosh, Esq.
Christina England, Esq.
Catherine E. Kanatas, Esq.
Joseph Lindell, Esq.
John Tibbetts, Paralegal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 catherine.scott@nrc.gov; beth.mizuno@nrc.gov; sherwin.turk@nrc.gov; brian.harris.@nrc.gov; david.roth@nrc.gov; anita.ghosh@nrc.gov; christina.england@nrc.gov; catherine.kanatas@nrc.gov; joseph.lindell@nrc.gov; john.tibbetts@nrc.gov OGC Mail Center OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov William B. Glew, Jr.
Organization: Entergy 440 Hamilton Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601 wglew@entergy.com
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention) 2 Elise N. Zoli, Esq.
Goodwin Proctor, LLP Exchange Place, 53 State Street Boston, MA 02109 ezoli@goodwinprocter.com Daniel Riesel, Esq.
Victoria Shiah Treanor, Esq.
Adam Stolorow, Esq.
Natoya Duncan, Paralegal Counsel for Town of Cortlandt Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
460 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 driesel@sprlaw.com; vtreanor@sprlaw.com astolorow@sprlaw.com; nduncan@sprlaw.com Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Paul M. Bessette, Esq.
Martin J. ONeill, Esq.
Brooke McGlinn, Esq.
Grant Eskelsen, Esq.
Ryan Lighty, Esq.
Lesa G. Williams-Richardson, Legal Secretary Doris Calhoun, Legal Secretary Mary Freeze, Legal Secretary Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 ksutton@morganlewis.com martin.oneill@morganlewis.com bmcglinn@morganlewis.com grant.eskelsen@morganlewis.com rlighty@morganlewis.com lrichardson@morganlewis.com dcalhoun@morganlewis.com mfreeze@morganlewis.com Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq.
Assistant County Attorney Office of Robert F. Meehan, Westchester County Attorney 148 Martine Avenue, 6th Floor White Plains, NY 10601 mjr1@westchestergov.com Matthew W. Swinehart, Esq.
Covington & Burling LLP 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 mswinehart@cov.com Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director Steven C. Filler Peter A. Gross Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
724 Wolcott Ave.
Beacon, NY 12508 mannajo@clearwater.org; stephenfiller@gmail.com; peter@clearwater.org Andrew Reid, Esq.
Organization: Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
Ved Nanda Center for International and Comparative Law 1075 Waite Drive Boulder, CO 80303 lawyerreid@gmail.com Richard Webster, Esq.
Public Justice, P.C.
For Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
1825 K Street, NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20006 rwebster@publicjustice.net Michael J. Delaney, Esq.
Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs NYC Department of Environmental Protection 59-17 Junction Boulevard Flushing, NY 11373 mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov Robert D. Snook, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Denying Riverkeepers Request for Admission of a New Contention) 3 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 robert.snook@po.state.ct.us David A. Repka, Esq.
Victoria Hsia, Esq.
Carlos L. Sisco, Paralegal Winston & Strawn 1701 K Street NW Washington, DC 20006 drepka@winston.com vhsia@winston.com CSisco@winston.com Paul Gallay, Esq.
Deborah Brown Ramona Cearley, Secretary Riverkeeper, Inc.
20 Secor Road Ossining, NY 10562 pgallay@riverkeeper.org dbrown@riverkeeper.org rcearley@riverkeeper.org John J. Sipos, Esq.
Lisa S. Kwong, Esq.
Brian Lusignan, Esq.
Mihir Desai, Esq.
Assistant Attorneys General Teresa Manzi, Legal Assistant Siobhan Blank, Legal Assistant Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York The Capitol, State Street Albany, New York 12224 john.sipos@ag.ny.gov lisa.kwong@ag.ny.gov brian.lusignan@ag.ny.gov mihir.desai@ag.ny.gov teresa.manzi@ag.ny.gov siobhan.blank@ag.ny.gov Kathryn M. DeLuca, Esq.
Laura Heslin, Esq.
Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York 120 Broadway, 26th Floor New York, New York 10271 kathryn.deluca@ag.ny.gov laura.heslin@ag.ny.gov Sean Murray, Mayor Kevin Hay, Village Administrator Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298 smurray@villageofbuchanan.com administrator@villageofbuchanan.com
[Original signed by R. Giitter ]
Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 15th day of April, 2016