ML15260A260

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Enforcement Conference on 911218 Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-269/91-28 & 50-269/91-32.List of Attendees & Handout Encl
ML15260A260
Person / Time
Site: Oconee Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1991
From: Gibson A
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Hampton J
DUKE POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 9201140050
Download: ML15260A260 (18)


See also: IR 05000269/1991028

Text

December 20, 1991

Docket No. 50-269

License No. DPR-38

Duke Power Company

ATTN:

Mr. J. W. Hampton

Vice President

Ocone Site

P. 0. Box 1439

Seneca, SC 29679

Gent emen:

SUBJECT: ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY

(NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-269/91-32)

This refers to the Enforcement Conference held at our request on

December 18, 1991. .This meeting concerned activities authorized for your Oconee

facility. The issues discussed at this conference were related to three apparent

violations covering failure to follow procedures/ inadequate procedures, failure

to maintain safety-related system out-of-service/ testing status, and failure to

implement effective corrective actions. -These apparent violations are associated

with the September 7, 1991,

reactor coolant system heat-up event and the

September 19-20, 1991,. over-pressurization of the low pressure injection system

event.

These events are described in the Augmented Inspection Team (AIT)

Inspection Report No.

50-269/91-28, dated October 30,

1991.

NRC Inspection

Report

No. .50-269/91-32,

dated

December .6, 1991,

describes the follow-up

inspection to the AIT and the apparent violations. A list of attendees and a

copy of your handout are enclosed.

We are continuing our review of these issues

to determine the appropriate enforcement action.

In accordance.with Section .2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title

10 Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be

placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

(ORIGINAL SIGNED BY C. JULIAN FOR)

Albert F. Gibson, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

Enclosures:

1. List of Attendees

2. Handout

cc w/encls:

See page 2)

9201140050 911220

PDR ADOCR 05000269

G

PDR

Duke Power Company

2

December 20, 1991

(cc w/encls cont'd)

A. V. Carr, Esq.

Duke Power Company

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28242-0001

County Super isor of Oconee County

Walhalla, SC 29621

Robert B. Borsum

Babcock and Wilcox Company

Nuclear Power Generation Division

Suite 525, 1700 Rockville Pike

Rockville, MD 20852

J. Michael McGarry, III, Esq.

Winston and Strawn

1400 L Street, NW

Washington, D. C. 20005

Office of Intergovernmental Relations

116 West Jones Street,

Raleigh, NC 27603

Heyward G. Shealy, Chief

Bureau of Radiological Health

South Carolina Department of Health

and Environmental Control

2600 Bull Street

Columbia, SC 29201

Manager, LIS

NUS Corporation

2650 McCormick Drive

Clearwater, FL 34619-1035

R. L. Gill

Nuclear Production Department

Duke Power Company

P. 0. Box 1007

Charlotte, NC 28201-1007

Karen E. Long

Assistant Attorney General

N. C. Department of Justice

P. 0. Box 629

Raleigh, NC 27602

(cc w/encl cont'd - See page 3)

Duke Power Company

3

December 20, 1991

(cc w/enc1 co nt'd)

M. E. Patrick

Compliance

Duke Power Company

P. 0. Box 1439

Seneca, SC

2'9679

bcc w/encl.

L. Wines, NRR

W. Miller, RIIl

G. A. Belisle, RH

A

Herdt, RII

o,.-Document Control Desk

NRC Resident Inspector

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Route 2, Box 610

Seneca, SC

29678

I* RRII:

S

RIIDR

RI

P

RII:DRS

rlenjak

T

les

ABeli

AHerdt

12//91

12/1 /91

12/ ' 9912/

/91

12

~~/2

2411t~ 4

ENCLOSURE 1

LIST OF ATTENDEES

Duke Power Company

J. W. Hampton, Oconee Nuclear Station, Vice President

H. Barron, Oconee Nuclear Station, Station Manager

J. Davis, Oconee Nuclear Station, Manager of Safety Assurance

M. Patrick, Oconee Nuclear Station, Compliance Manager

G. Ridgeway, Oconee Nuclear Station, Shift Operations Manager

R. Sweigart, Oconee Nuclear Station, Superintendent of Operations

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

S. Ebneter, Regional Administrator, RH

R. Baldwin, Reactor Engineer, Operator Licensing, DRS, RII

G. Belisle, Chief, Section 3A, Division of Reactor Projects, RH

W. Cline, Chief, RP/EP Branch, DRSS, RH

R. Crlenjak, Chief, Operational Programs Section, DRS, RH

A. Gibson, Director, Division of Reactor Safety, RH

A. Herdt, Chief, Branch 3, Division of Reactor Projects, RII

P. Harmon, Senior Resident Inspector, RH

G. Jenkins, Director, Enforcement and Investigation Coordination Staff, RIT

J. Johnson, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects, RI.I

R. Laufer, Enforcement Specialist, OE

E. Merschoff, Director (Acting), Division of Reactor Projects, RH

W. Miller, Jr., Project Engineer, DRP, RII

S. Ninh, Project Engineer, DRP, RII

T. Peebles, Chief, Operations Branch, DRS, RH

L. Reyes, Director, Division of Reactor Projects, Rh

W. Sartor, Senior Radiation Specialist, DRSS, RH

B. Uryc, Senior Enforcement Specialist, EICS, RH

L. Wiens, Senior Project Manager, NRR

ENCLOSURE 2

OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION

SHUTDOWN EVENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCE

DECEMBER 18, 1991

AGENDA

INTRODUCTION

J. W. HAMPTON

EVENT DESCRIPTIONS

H. B. BARRON

INCIDENT ASSESSMENT AND

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

H. B. BARRON

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

J. M. DAVIS

REVIEW OF APPARENT

VIOLATIONS

J. M. DAVIS

SUMMARY

J. W. HAMPTON

E

IP-3

LP 4

LPSV-251

LL P- 5 L P P U

LP-LP-

I

E

P 1LP-26

LP-74

E

P 9

HIGH ACTIVITY

VASTE TANK

L---

RCS

LP-75

LP-

-6

RCS

B ST EERG

LP-73

LP-7

LPI PUMP C

LP-69E

E LP- 10

LF1LP

LP-8?

LPSV25

LPI PUMP B.

LP-6 8

OCONEE

LOV PRESSURE INJECTION SYSTEA

E

LP-3

LLP-4

LP_ 3LPSV-251

E

LP

EP

E

L P-

LP 2

LP 7

LP -9P

V-25

I HIGH ACTIVITYLP2

VASTE TANK__

RCS

LP -75

ELP

6

UA

BLST EERG

LP-73

EP LP

LP1U.

LP-6

E2L-1

E

LP- 10

HIGH ACTIVITY

VASTE TANK

LPP-25

LP-13

LP-4CPS

BVSLPEAER

LPS-252

LPI PUrP B

LLP-68

OCONEE

LOV PRESSURE

INJECT ION SYSTE

B

SV I TCHOVER AL I

GN1MENT

INCIDENT ASSESSMENT

ROOT CAUSE

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF LICENSED

PERSONNEL WERE NOT ADEQUATELY DEFINED,

UNDERSTOOD, AND EXECUTED

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

RE VISED

MANAGEMENT

DIRECTIVES

TO

CLEARLY DEFINE AND DIFFERENTIATE THE

ROLES OF:

OPERATOR AT THE CONTROLS

BALANCE OF PLANT OPERATOR(S)

CONTROL ROOM SRO

UNIT SUPERVISOR (SRO)

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

ESTABLISHED

OPERATOR

QUALITY

TEAM

To

DEFINE BARRIERS TO QUALITY OPERATION

EXAMI LES:

LIMIT

LICENSED

OPERATORS

AND

CORRESPONDING

WORK

LOAD

IN

THE

CONTROL ROOM AT A GIVEN TIME

ENHANCE SHIFT TURNOVER PRACTICES

MORE FREQUENT PRE-JOB BRIEFINGS

CHANGE ROLE OF SUPPORT STAFF TO QUALITY

COORDINATORS

RATHER

THAN

WORK

COORDINATORS

IMPROVE WORK FLOW/INTERFACE WITH THE

CONTROL ROOM

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

REQUESTED AND RECEIVED INPO ASSESSMENT OF

CURRENT PRACTICES AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

PLANS

AREAS OF EMPHASIS:

IMPROVE STRUCTURE OF EXTERNAL WORK

AC IVITIES WITH THE CONTROL ROOM

IMPROVE ON-SHIFT MODIFICATION TRAINING

WITH MORE LIVE AND HANDS ON INSTRUCTION

SOME

IMPROVEMENT

OPPORTUNITIES

IN

ADMINISTRATION OF BLOCK TAGOUTS

NEED BETTER STATION INTEGRATION OF VALVE

ACTIVITIES, INCLUDING TESTING

INCIDENT ASSESSMENT

CONTRIBUTING CAUSE

PROCESSES FOR MANAGEMENT

OVERSIGHT

AND ASSESSMENT

FAILED TO DETECT AND

CORRECT A NEGATIVE TREND

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

"SAFETY REVIEW SECTION" WILL ENHANCE

PROCESSES

TO

PERIODICALLY

ASSESS

MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

INCREASED TRAINING AND EMPHASIS ON ROOT

CAUSE EVALUATION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

FOR LESS SIGNIFICANT EVENTS

DIRECTIVE BEING DEVELOPED TO CLARIFY THE

MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT EXPECTATIONS OF

THE SHIFT SUPERVISOR

ROUTINE

ASSESSMENT

OF

SHIFT

WATCH

STANDING

PRACTICES

BY

NON-SHIFT

MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

INCIDENT ASSESSMENT

CONTRIBUTING CAUSE

SURVEILLANCE

PROCEDURES

DID

NOT

ADEQUATELY

ADDRESS

MONITORING

OF

CRITICAL PARAMETERS DURING SHUTDOWN

OPERATIONS

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

PROCEDURE CHANGES TO REQUIRE LOGGING

OF CRITICAL PARAMETERS EVERY 2 HOURS

ENHANCED

USE

OF

PROCESS

COMPUTER

MONITORING AND ALARM CAPABILITIES

REDUCE

"COLD

SHUTDOWN

HIGH

TEMP"

ANUNCIATOR SETPOINT TO 125 DEGREES

INCIDENT ASSESSMENT

CONTRIBUTING CAUSE

LPI SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURE DID NOT

ADEQUATELY ADDRESS TRANSITIONS BETWEEN

OPERATING ALIGNMENTS

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

REVISING LPI OPERATING

PROCEDURE

TO

ADDRESS CHANGING OPERATING TRAINS

OTHER

"ROUTINE"

EQUIPMENT

MANIPULATIONS BEING REVIEWED TO IDENTIFY

THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES

INCIDENT ASSESSMENT

DEFICIENCY

CO NTROL OVER REMOTE TESTING OF MOTOR

OPERATED VALVES IN SYSTEMS NOT REMOVED

FROM SERVICE NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

CORRECTIVE ACTION

IMPLEMENTING

PROCEDURE

CHANGES

TO

REQUIRE

CONTINUOUS

COMMUNICATIONS

WITH CONTROL ROOM PERSONNEL WHILE

CYCLING SAFETY-RELATED MOTOR OPERATED

VALVES

IN SYSTEMS NOT REMOVED FROM

SERVICE

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE

HEAT-U P EVENT

CONTROL ROOM INDICATIONS WOULD HAVE

ALERTED OPERATORS HAD EVENT CONTINUED

CORE WOULD HAVE REMAINED COVERED FOR

MORE THAN 20 ADDITIONAL HOURS

No FUEL DAMAGE

NO SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE,

PRESSURIZATION EVENT

NO INDICATION OF LPI COOLER TUBE LEAKAGE

NO SIGNIFICANT RADIATION EXPOSURE TO

PERSONNEL

LPI SYSTEM REMAINED OPERABLE

NO SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO PUBLIC SAFETY

REVIEW OF APPARENT VIOLATIONS

FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES/INADEQUATE

PROCEDURES

AGREE

WITH

ALL

EXAMPLES

EXCEPT

EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION

LO SS

OF

SHUTDOWN

FUNCTO

CLASSIFICATION NOT INTENDED FORTHIS TYPE

SITUATION

FAILURE TO IDENTIFY SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEM

STATUS

COMMAND AND CONTROL AS IDENTIFIED IN

PROCEDURE

CONCERNS

-

INADEQUATE

PROCEDURE

FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT EFFECTIVE CORRECTIVE

ACTION

ADMIT VIOLATION