ML14317A030
| ML14317A030 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 11/10/2014 |
| From: | Magda M Public Commenter |
| To: | Camper L, Macfarlane A, Thomas Wengert NRC/Chairman, Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs, Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| Shared Package | |
| ML14317A031 | List: |
| References | |
| LTR-14-0658 | |
| Download: ML14317A030 (1) | |
Text
CHAIRMAN Resource From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Tom and Larry,
Marni Magda <marnimagda@gmail.com>
Monday, November 10, 2014 1:19 PM camper@nrc.gov; Wengert, Thomas; CHAIRMAN Resource; Marni Magda Deny Songs PSDAR and DCE I will send a letter soon in request on the public record for the NRC to say "NO" to the August 27, 2014 version of SCE's DCE and PSDAR. It does not include a budget for protection of life now that the spent nuclear fuel can remain on site "indefinitely."
With the lawsuits now pending about the Environmental Impact of the Generic Waste Rule, I would like to add that document does not hold to the truth of today's environmental and security dangers for protecting life. I spoke at your hearing to those issues and will return to them as soon as I can.
Please re-read and send to your new Chairman of the NRC my letter of Sept 24, 2014 About the Sept. 24, 2014 telephone conference I listened to about SCE moving the current Main Control Room. TAC NOS MF4778 and MF4779. I will resend it if necessary. What I heard was about twenty people looking back in time for a precedent to allow SCE to reduce security and rebuild a control room three times without any true information given to the public on the plan.I was appalled and the non-science of our current times now makes sense to me.
We can not rely on old studies that do no consider today's problems. The EIE was the same way. And NUREG 1927 is far from reassuring that there is any re licensing of dry storage casks that is not dangerous in its lack of detail and cost and authority.
My question that needs an answer ASAP in order for me to understand my ideas about the NRC Hearing on Oct 27th in order to write to you about the SCE propaganda that continues at public meetings has to due with safety proclamations by SCE. The question: Does the NRC make regulations binding the nuclear industry to protect the public against "denial of property" in case of a nuclear accident? Are all of the regulations set and enforced only for protection oflife? Is SCE responsible if people around SONGS cannot return to their homes for tens of thousands of years ?
I would appreciate an email in response to this question ASAP. I understand you have new leadership which must come up to speed on many issues across the country, but the NRC will rubber stamp a terrible SONGS SCE PSDAR and irresponsible DCE by December 22,2014.
Thank you for your time.
Best Regards, Mami Magda Marnimagda(tV,gmai l.com 949 230 9181 1