Text

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report Revision 1, Appendix B (2 of 2)
	ML13340A162
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	10/09/2013
From:	; Paul C. Rizzo Associates, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML13340A277	List: L-13-358, Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report Revision 1, Appendix B (2 of 2); ML13340A147; ML13340A155; ML13340A156; ML13340A157; ML13340A158; ML13340A159; ML13340A160; ML13340A162; ML13340A163;
References
	L-13-358
	Download: ML13340A162 (178)
	v • d • e

Sheet 202 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HIS 7528 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB SFAS CHANNEL I BLOCK SW inside PNL C5705 Status:@N U Floor El.

623 Room 505 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside Panel C5705, which has similar anchorage to Panel C5702.

Back panel doors are adequately attached to panel structure with 4-l/2" screws.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y N/A Y

X X

X x

X X

Sheet 203 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

HIS 7528 Equip. Class SFAS CHANNEL I Equipment Description

20. Instrument and Control Panels Status:@N U BLOCK SW inside PNL C5705 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

U N

Y U

N/A N/A U

N/A X

x X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

1. rrr/P'#;'L Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffich

Sheet 204 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2b Equip. Class MOTOR OPERATED 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Statusff)N U Equipment Description VALVE HP-2B Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Room 236 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verif,tcation)?

Valve is horizontally mounted on the pipe. There is an anchor right below the valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion oxidation?

MOV found with good surface finish that is more than mild surlace and no srgns of corrosion.

NiA N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage conf,rguration verif,rcation is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

Sheet 205 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic \\ilalkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(?)N u Equipment ID No.

hp2b Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No potential interaction hszards identifiedfrom nearby equipment.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of block walls in the area verified as walls 2337 and 2347.

Blockwall hazard identified as Non-Credible.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexibl e lines inspected and found with adequate fl exibi I ity.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y Y

N/A N/A X

X x

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Pipe enters conrainment penetration P-20from Aux. Building. The pipe is judged adequatefor Seismic Anchor Motion loads

(-15' offlex. Length)

Evaluated by:

Date:

7l2s/2012 Y

Eddie M. Guerra

,, r

/ /,

, i : ; t /

'Ifr'"///

Adam L. Helffrich Date:

7/25/2012

Sheet 206 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusON U Equipment ID No.

hpZb Equipment Description Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2B HP2B Plate ID Plate of component HP2B General General view of component Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2c Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-ZC Statusff)N U Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Room 208 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Pipe is adequately supported at -24" on either side of the valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y X

X X

X

Sheet 208 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {. CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2c Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment Description MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-}C status(f)N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines were found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

N X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,&'r',{/ w,,/,

Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 209 of379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

hp2c Equip. Class 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Equipment DescriPtion MOTOR OPERATED VALVE HP-2C Ot ant documents and photos (if any):

Status@N U HP2C General General view of comPonent

Sheet 210 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equip. Class 0. Other Status@N U Equipment ID No.

HV5314 Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

623 Room 5 1 5 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/a of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

HSS 6x6 rack anchored to floor and wall found in adequate condition.

Damper attached to rackwithfour I/2" diameter bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50To for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

Sheet 2lI of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

HV53l4 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Status(?)N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible lines qttached to componentfound in good condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y N U X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Adam L. Helffrich Date:

712517012 Eddie M. Guerra

,#rr"/P&/,

Date:,lzst2otz

Sheet 212 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

statusG)N u HV5314 Plate ID Plate of component HV53 14 General General view of component

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. HV5314 Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description MOTOR-OPERATED DAMPER HV 5314 HV53 14 anchorage View of anchorage Sheet 213 of 379 status(?\\N u

Sheet 214 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small solenoid valve on strut channel, which is attached to concrete wall.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X

Y N U

NiA Y N U N / A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

Statusff)N U Equipment ID No.14-636 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description IA PCV FOR MU66A Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 208 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

X

Sheet 215 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N U Equipment ID No.

IA-636 Equip. Class IA PCV FOR MU66A

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting' and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines were found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

712512012 Date:

7l25l2Ul2 Eddie M. Guerra

,/#r,,/ //'"#4'/*

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 216 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

IA-636 Equip. Class Equipment Description IA PCV FOR MU66A Status(?)N u

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

IA-636 Plate and General General view of component

Sheet 217 of379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description ICSI I A A vent valve Status(T) N u Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacfurer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

643 Room 602 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Top and bottom of valve found to be restrained. No degraded condition found.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X x

X

Sheet 218 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description ICS1 lA Atmosphere vent valve status(?)N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Flexible lines found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

U N

Y N

Y U

N Y

N/A U

NiA X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra tfirt/A Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

712512012

Sheet 219 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6r-CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG'\\N u Equipment ID No. ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description ICS I lA Atmosphete uent ualue Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

ICSI lA Plate ID Plate of component General view of comPonent

Sheet 220 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6{- CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

ICSI lA Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description ICS I lA Atmosphere vent valve Status@N U ICSI lA brace2 Brace support for component ICSI lA brace Brace support for component

Sheet 221 of 379 ENGTNEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ICSI lA Equipment DescriPtion Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves ICSI IA At Status@N U ICSI lA anchor View of anchorage

Sheet 222 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

K5-l Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 StatusQN u Room 3 1 8 Manufacturer. Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Equipmentfound to be stitch welded to base.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage detailfound to be consistent with the presented in SQUG calc C-CSS-K\\-1. 16 - I I/4" cast-in place bolts spaced around 5ft each'

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X

Sheet 223 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

K5-l Equip. Class Diesel Generator Equipment Description status(?)N u

17. Engine Generators Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified.

Associated blockwalls identffied as: 308D, 309D, 310D, 3l ID, 338D See Appendix Cfrom reportfor references. Identffied as seismically adequate.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Er* GINEERS & CONSULT^ANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statu(T) N u Equipment ID No.

K5-2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Floor El.

585 Room 319 Manufacturer. Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments' Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Equipmentfound to be stitch welded to base.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required')

Anchorage detailfound to be consistent with the presented in SQUG calc C-CSS-Kl-2. I6 - I l/4' cast-in place bolts spaced around 5ft each.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N

Y X

X X

X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENCTNEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

K5-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwall 304D verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref, VBWI2-8001-064, Rev 8 (8/26/87).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Sheet 225 of 379 StatusON U

712512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Date:

Sheet 226 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUITANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) statusG)N u Equipment ID No.

K5-2 Equip. Class 17. Engine Generators Equipment Description Diesel Generator Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

K5-2 plate ID Plate of component K5-2 general General view of component

Sheet 227 of379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS &. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (S\\ilC)

Status@N U Equipment ID No.

K5-2 Equipment Description Equip. Class Diesel Generator

17. Engine Generators K5-2 anchor bolt Partial view of anchorage, view is tlpical of all anchors

Sheet 228 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

L3l I Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status@N U Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L3I I Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside of panel C5762C. While anchorage of the panel is external to the panel, they are covered by a trip protection covering that could not be removed.

Anchorage condition based on SQUG calc C-CSS-C5762C.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-CSS-C5762C calculations indicate that MOD95-0032 resolves anchorage concerns and cabinet bolting issues. It was verified that the adjacent panels are connected at the top.

Anchorage adequacy deemed seismically adequate.

Based on good condition of panel and SQUG SEWS, anchorage is judged to be in adequate condition.

N/A N/A X

X X

X

Sheet 229 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

L3l I Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL 20a. Inst. in control panelicabinet Equipment Description I MODULE L3I I Interaction Effects

7. Ate soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

of379 Status(f\\tN U N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

/r,#,/,

Date:

712512012 Date:

7t25t20t2

Sheet 230 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS Gt CTONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (S\\ilC)

Equipment ID No.

L3l I Equip. Class 20a.Inst. in control panel/cabinet Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L3II L3l I General view of component Status@N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS Gt CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (S\\ilC)

Equipment ID No.

L3l I Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Equipment Description I MODULE L3I I Sheet 231of 379 StatusON U L3ll-5ll cabinet General View of Cabinet housing components L3l I -51 I cabinets bolted together inbetween Cabinets are bolted together in the middle

Sheet 232 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc" ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status@N U Equipment ID No.

L3l I Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panelicabinet Equipment Description MODULE L3 I I L3ll -51 I cabinets welded together on left Cabinets are welded together on the left side L3l I -51 I cabinets welded together on right Cabinets are welded together on the right side

Sheet 233 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

L5l I Equip. Class 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Status6'\\N U Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE L5I I Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside of panel C5762C. While anchorage of the panel is external to the panel, they are covered by a trip protection covering that could not be removed. Anchorage condition based on SQUG calc C-CSS-C5762C.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-CSS-C5762C calculations indicate that MOD95-0032 resolves anchorage concerns and cabinet bolting issues. It was verified that the adjacent panels are connected at the top.

Anchorage adequacy deemed seismically adequate.

Based on good condition of panel and SQUG SEWS, anchorage is judged to be in adequate condition' N/A NiA X

X X

X

Sheet 234 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(f)N U Equipment ID No.

L5l I Equipment Description Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet MODULE L5I I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

x X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

{i,,//1#;'/,

Date:

7l25l2Ul2 Date:

7lzsl20l2 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 235 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS &. CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. L5l1 Equip. Class 20a.Inst. in control panel/cabinet Equipment Description LOGIC CHANNEL I MODULE LsII Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

L5l I General view of component

Sheet 236 of 379 Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(?)N u Equipment ID No.

L5l I Equipment Description Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL I 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet MODULE L5I I L3 ll-5ll cabinet General View of Cabinet housing components L3 I I -51 I cabinets bolted together inbetween Cabinets are bolted together in the middle

Sheet 237 of379 Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6{. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(hN U Equipment ID No.

L5l I Equip. Class LOGIC CHANNEL 20a. Inst. in control panel/cabinet Equipment Description I MODULE L5I I L3l I -51 I cabinets welded together on left Cabinets are welded together on the left side L3l I -51 I cabinets welded together on right Cabinets are welded together on the right side

of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) status:oN u Equipment ID No. LI-l525A Equipment Description Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels BWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

623 Room 502 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage could not be verified due to mastic covertng bottom of panel.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

X X

Sheet 239 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINEERS d( CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LI-l525A Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified Blockwalls in room 502 found to be seismically adequate per 80-l I documentation.

R"fe, to Appendix Cfor list of walls associated to component.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

X Y

X status(f)N u Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

/,/.,,i',: '/

,ti#rr'{7 F'{,fuW Date:

712512012 Date:

7t2512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 240 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. LI-I5254 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description BWST LEVEL INDICATOR INSIDE PNL C5716 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Status(?)N U Lll525A Plate and General Overall view of component and anchorage

Sheet 241 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Status/?)N u Equipment Description SGl LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

623 Room 502 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This switch is inside panel C576IA.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y N/A N/A N/A Y

X X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (S\\MC)

Equipment ID No.

LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Adjacent panels connected at top.

End panels have 3" gap and also top connected by conduit.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions 1l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Sheet242of379 status(f)N u

NiA 712512012 712512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

. a t

/

/ ' t

' ; : " /

,r/*'r// Hr{Jv'7v Date:

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Statusf)N u

Sheet 243of 379 f$fr SP9B9 -073 Switch View of component inside cabinet sP9B9 -073 General view of component

Sheet 244 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS Ct CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LSHHSP9B6 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment DescriPtion SGI LEVEL SWITCH SP9B6 StatusG)N u SP9B9 -073 bolted at toP Cabinet is bolted to adjacent cabinet at the top

Sheet 245 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LT-1402 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE 1 LV TRANS Status9 N U Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

623 Room 501 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Mounted on -24" talt HSS 6x6 cantilever reck, which is anchored to theJloor by four I/2" diameter anchor bolts.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

While spalling of grout pad on one side was observed, it was iudged adequate since the loads are very small G<50 lbs)

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y N/A N/A Y

X X

of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LT-1402 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE 1 LV TRANS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached flexible lines found in addequate condition.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction efTects?

X X

Sheet246 Statusfl\\N U N/A N/A N/A 712512012 X

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Anchor spacing to adjacent rackfound acceptable by engineering judgement and small demand loads.

Evaluated by:

Date:

Eddie M. Guerra r i l

/ / ' t

, r : " ' /

rwrrr/H,{/torr Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENG lN EE RS & C-ONSU LTA: **TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LT-1402 Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on)

CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS LT I 402 Plate ID Plate of component LT I 402 General General view of component Sheet 247 of 379 Status/?)N U Racks Other s orting or relevant documents and C

Sheet 248 of 379 Paul C. Ri zze Associates, Inc.

EN(;INEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N u Equipment ID No.

LT-1402 Equipment DescriPtion Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks CC SRG TNK I-I SIDE I LV TRANS r

'ffi,,"

.fr l-T l 402 anchorage Vielv o1'anchorage LT I 402 SPalled Grout on Anchor Grout around base plate has crumbled away

Sheet 249 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Er*GINEERS & CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 Room StatusON U 3 1 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and flrndings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Transmitter mounted with 4-3/8" diameter bolts to a wall mounted HSS 6x6, which is anchored to wall with 4-I/2" diameter anchor bolts.

No degraded conditions foundfor the wall mounting supporting the transmitter.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 5O%ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y NiA N/A Y

x X

X X

Sheet 250 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAINTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EDG DAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Status(f)N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

U N

Y N

Y U

N/A U

N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

. j /

/

i. t

' l i : - ' t /

,'rf*'o/ H,'//la Date:

7lzsl20l2 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 251 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

LT-2787 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description EDGDAY TANK I-I LVL TRANSMITT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

StatusON U LT2787 Plate ID Plate of component LT2787 General General view of comPonent

Sheet 252 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc, ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusQN U Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equipment Description Equip. Class MS l0l (MSIV SGI)

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

643 Room 601 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded conditions identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A x

X X

X x

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINSERS

6. CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equipment Description Equip. Class MS l0r (MSrv scl)

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

x X

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

253of 379 status(f)N u

N/A N/A 712s12012 712512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

. i !

I /, t, / ' ; ' " /

t#ro'r/ F4/tgrr Date:

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 254 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6{. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (S\\ilC)

Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description MS l0l (MSIV SGI Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Status/?)N U MSlOl general General view of component MS I 01 gen eral?

General view of component

Sheet 255 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MSl0l Equip. Class MS l0l (MSIV SGI)

Equipment Description

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves status(?)N u of 379 Ms l0l attachment to steam PiPe Valve connection to main steam line

Sheet 256 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. MS5889A Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description AOV MS 58894 Status{V)N U Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Room 237 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Valve on 6" pipe line with considerable weight.

Pipe span -8', rigid supports on either side of valve. Valve -2'from one end.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchoruge evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X

257 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & C]ONSULTANTS Status:ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No. MS5889A (swc)

Equip. Class AOV MS 58894

7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines found with addequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Y x

Other Adverse Conditions I L Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich Date:

7t25t20t2

Sheet 258 of 319 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS d. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statu$

N U Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Equip.

AFP/T-1 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

565 Room 237 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skidwith 8-I I/2" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Configuration consistent with documented configuration in SQUG calculation C-CSS-P14-I

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

Y N/A Y

X X

PCe Paul C' Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-1 Equip. Class Equipment Description AFPiT-I Sheet

5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

2s9of379 status(?)N u 7/2s12012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

- ///'

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 260 of 379 Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Equip. Class status(?'\\N u

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description AFP/T-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P l4-I plate ID Plate of component Pl4-I general General view of component

of 379 ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Pl4-l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Equip. Class AFP/T-I

5. HorizontalPumps P 14-I anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors StatusON U Equipment Description Sheet 261 P l4-I general4 General view of component

Sheet 262 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statu@N u Equipment ID No.

Pl4-2 Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equip.

AFP/T-2 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 238 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skid with eight I I/2" anchors.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Tofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG C-CSS-Pt4-l and C-CSS-PI4-2 calculation (page a of I6) identifies the configuration as 8-I l/2" bolts and itwas confirmed in thefield duringwalkdown inspection.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

U N/A U

NiA U

N/A U

N Y

X X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CIONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Pl4-2 Equip. Class AFPIT-2

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazards identified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

Sheet263of 379 Status(f)N u NiA N/A 712512012 712512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Adam L. Helffrich Date:

Date:

Sheet 264 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

& CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Pl4-2 Equip. Class Equipment Description AFP/T-2 StatusON U

5. Horizontal Pumps Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Pl4-2 plate ID Plate of component Pl4-2 general3 General view of component

Sheet 265 of 379 ENGTNEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Equip. Class AFP/T-2

5. Horizontal Pumps Pl4-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors statusG)N u Equipment ID No. Pl4-2 Equipment Description Pl4-Z general General view of component

Sheet 266 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statu{T) N u Equipment ID No.

P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description P3-2 Location: Bldg.

INTK Floor El.

576 Room 52 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments' Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition found for anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight corrosionfound on main pipe line and on anchors due to humid environment.

Judged surface corrosion and adequate.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage conf,rguration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified with drawing M-04 5 -0000 2.

I2-I l/2"diam bolts for square plate and I - I 5/8" diam bolts for circum' plate.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X N/A Y

Y Y

Y X

X X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusON U Equipment ID No.

P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Equipment Description Pump P3-2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y U

N Y

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

/.t/

/

t l/"

"/

u{*r//Fdkn'A Date:

7125/2012 Date:

7125/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 268 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) status(?\\N u Equipment Description Pump P3-z Equipment ID No.

P3-2 P3-2 plate ID Plate of component Equip. Class 6. Vertical Pumps Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P3-2 general General view of component P3-2 general2 General view of component

Sheet 269 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P3-2 Equip. Class 6. Vertical PumPs Equipment Description Pump P3-2 P3-2 corrosion on bolts Surface corosion on bolts judged not significant StatusG\\N u P3-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 270 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status:QN U Equipment ID No.

P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 225 Manufacturer. Model" Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Motor mounted on skid with 12. I" ancltor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-P37-2 page 4 of 5.

Calc shows that 12-I"diam anchor bolts for mounting are seismically adequate.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA Y

Y Y

N/A Y

X X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCTNEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment Equipment ID No.

P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Small cart nearby is not securely tied to wall, but judged not to be a potential interaction hazard.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the areaverified.

Blockwall 2047 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW06-8001-028, Rev 4 (7/29/88).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Auached lines rigidly connected to equipment. No concern idenifiedfrom pot e ntial r el ativ e mov ement.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

27rof 379 Statusf\\N U

N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012

Sheet 272 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CTONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P3728 plate ID Plate of component P3728 general General view of component statusQ)N u

Sheet 273 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors StarusQ[ u P3728 anchorage P3728 masonry wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit

Sheet 274 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6.. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P3728 Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description MOTOR-DRIVEN PUMP P3728 unsecured cart near unit Possible interaction with nearby cart statusQ;N u

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P4-l Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description Screen wash pump P4-l Location: Bldg.

INTK Floor El.

585 Room 50 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Sheet 275 of379 Statuq(qN U X

X N/A N/A N/A X

X X

X

Sheet 276 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P4-l Equip. Class 0. Other Equipment Description Screen wash pump P4-l Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

StatusQN u Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

7/2s12012 Eddie M. Guerra

,r!/

/ / ' i1:"/

uturr/Hr{knw 7/2s/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 217 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Status:QN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No.

P42-l Equipment Description (swc)

Equip. Class P42-l Pump for decay

5. Horizontal Pumps heat 1-l Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

545 Room 105 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skid with I - 3/4" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-P42-1.

Page 4 of 5 shows 8-3/4"diam anchors spaced at -i8".

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A X

X X

x X

X

Sheet 278 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P42-l Equipment Description Equip. Class P42-l Pump for decay

5. Horizontal Pumps heat l-l Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Surounding pipingfound to be rigidly supported.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

of 379 StatusON U

N/A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety lound no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

/

t,r/

/

t

'//t'

/

ud'*r/ Hl{#rw Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 279 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENG INEERS {i.. CONSULTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P42-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description P42-l Pump for decay heat I - I P42-l plate ID Plate of component P42-l general General view of component Status(?)N u Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 280 of 379 ENGINEERS S{- CONSULT AhITS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P42-l Equipment Description P42-l Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Pump for decay heat I - I P42-l general2 General view of component P42-l anchorage2 Partial view of anchorage, view is tlpical of all anchors status(?\\N u

Sheet 281 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {i CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(!\\N U

Equipment ID No.

P43-2 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps CCW PUMP I-2 Floor El.

585 Room 328 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchored with 8-1" bolts on skid.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No missing parts or degraded condition identifiedfor anchorqge.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration verified based on drawing M-046-00003.

Configuration consistent with 8-l " bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X

X X

X x

x

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG1NEERS & CONSULTAI\\.'TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P43-2 Equip. Class CCW PUMP I-2 status(?)N u

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Nozzles rigidly supported.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

of 379 Other Adverse Conditions I 1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

r!

/ /..t,'flt'"/

t#*'r/Fdht'rr Date:

7/2512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 283 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P43-2 Equip. Class CCW PUMP I-2 StatusON U

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description P43-2 plate ID Plate of component P43-2 general General view of component

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P43-V Equip. Class CCWPUMP I-2

5. Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description Sheet 284 of379 StatusG)N U P43-2 anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 285of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P58-l Equip. Class 5. Horizontal Pumps StatusG)N U Equipment Description HPI PUMP I-I Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

545 Room 105 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on skid with I - I" anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No missing parts or degraded condition identifiedfor anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

No craclrs identified on mounting grout.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configurationv erified with drawing M-5 I 8-000 2 3.

Mounting skid anchored with I - l" diam. Bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUIIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. P58-l Equipment Description Sheet Equip.

HPI PUMP I-I Class 5. Horizontal Pumps Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

286of 379 status(f)N u

N/A Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

. 1 r

/

/. t, / ) ' " /

/tf;r',,///,b/,idhttr Date:

7/2st2012 Date:

7l2s/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 287 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS e.' CONSUETANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

P58-l statusG\\N u Equipment Description Equip. Class HPI PUMP I-I

5. Horizontal PumPs Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

P58-l plate ID Plate of component General view of comPonent

Sheet 288 of 379 Paul C. Rizz() Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & C]ONSL;UTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) statusf\\N U Equipment ID No. P58-l Equipment Description Equip.

HPI PUMP I-I Class 5. Hori zontal Pumps P58-l general2 General view of component P58-I anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 289 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUXTANTS Status(T) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No.

PS3689D Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks (swc)

PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

623 Room 501 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Supported on wall-mounted rack. No degraded condition identified.

Racks anchored with 8-1/2" bolts.

Pressure switch is attached to the rackwith 4-l/2" diameter bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

U N

N Y

Y N/A N

Y N

Y U

N/A U

N Y

X X

P(}e Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

PS3689D Equipment Description of379 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached line is flexible.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Sheet290 StatusG)N u N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,,, 1 /

/ /, L i ; t ' /

ttd'ttrt/ /t/kt?

Date:

712512012 Date:

7/2st20t2 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 291 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS er CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) status(?')N u Equipment ID No.

PS3689D Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

PS3689 plate ID Plate of component PS3689 general General view of component

Sheet 292 of 379 ENGINEERS &. CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.

Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESSURE SWITCH PS3689D PS3689 anchorage typical Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Status(?)N U Equipment ID No. PS3689D Equipment Description

Sheet 293 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

PSL l06C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks StatusG)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-1 INLET Floor El.

565 Room 237 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Switch mounted on 6x6 tube section with 4-l/2" diameter bolts

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

U N

Y N

Y N/A N/A U

NiA U

N/A U

N Y

X X

X x

pc'...e Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

PSL l06C Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-I INLET Sheet 294 of 379 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Y x

Y X

Status(f)N U Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

7/2512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 295 of 379 ENGINEERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

PSL l06C Equipment Description Paul C. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks PRESS SWITCH LOW FOR AFP TURB I-I INLET StatusG)N U Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

h f Pr^

PSLI06C Plate and General Overall view of component and anchorage PSLI06C General General view of component

Sheet 296 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG INEERS & CONSULTAINTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N U Equipment ID No.

PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 4928A Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

565 Room 237 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Switch is mounted on a cantileveredfloor mounted rack which is anchored with 4-1/2" diameter anchors.

Switch is connected to the strut member, which is welded to the rack by 4-I/2" diameter channel nuts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

N Y

NiA N/A N/A X

X X

X

Sheet 297 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 49284 Status(?)N u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y NiA N/A U

N/A X

X x

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Anchor spacing to adjacent floor mounted rack is judged adequate.

U N

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra l#rr'/P.il; Date:

712512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 298 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6[ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 4928A PSL 4928{plate ID Plate of component PSL4928A General General view of component StatusG)N u

Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {i.. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. PSL4928A Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description PRESS SWITCH PS 4928A PSL 4gzS[anchorage View of anchorage Sheet 299 of 379 Status(?)N u PSL 4928A Anchor Spacing to Adjacent Rack

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seisrnic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

RC370l Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Sheet 300 of 379 Status/T-\\N U Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Relay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Floor El.

585 Room 3r4 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on short steel brace stand anchored with 4-I/2" bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

N/A

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface Y

Y Y

N/A N/A N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage confi guration consis tent with SQU G calculation C - C SS-RC 3 7 0 L 4 angle-section legs anchrored with 4-I/2" bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y X

X X

X

P(}e Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (StilC)

Equipment ID No.

RC3701 Equipment Description Sheet statussN u Equip.

Relay Cabinet Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No potential interaction hazards identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Auached top conduits provide lateral restraint to cabinet.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Y x

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M.

Date:

7125/2012 Date:

7125/2012 Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 302 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS &. CONSTITANTS Seismlc Welkdown Checkllst (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

RC370l Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels StatusG)N U Equipment Description Relay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

RC370l plate ID Plate of component RC370l general General view of component

Sheet 303 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

RC370l Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description Relay Cabinet in Mechanical Penetration Room 4 RC370l Conduits Conduits Going into Cabinet status(?)N u

Sheet 304 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS d. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SFl l Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 5OYo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

statu{T)N u Equipment Description BWS Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

586' Room 304 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Valvefound in good condition. No signs of corrosing identffied in main line.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y N X

Y N U

N/A Y N U N i A X

Y N U N / A X

Y N U X

X

Sheet 305 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) statusF)N u Equipment ID No.

SF I I Equipment Description Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve BWST Supply Line to SFP Pumps Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

7125/2012 Eddie M. Guerra

, ', i f

/

/ ' t

' j : " /

d'ar/ H,{/t'w 712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 306 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6.. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

StatusG)N u Equipment ID No.

SFI I Equipment Description Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve BWST Supply Line to SFP Pumps Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SFI I component ID ID Plate of component SFl l general view General view of component

Sheet 307 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SFl616,4.

Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Status:ON U Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE 1616 KI Source Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

570'3" Room 122 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small hand value on -1" diameter pipe.

Pipe rigidly supported to wall within -10" of valve.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Wall mounted supports found in adequate condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINSERS {i. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SFl6l6A Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE 1616 KI Source Statusc)N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra s ' !

/

/ r )

, / ; t.. /

,'Huoo/ b/r'{,Fttr Date:

7/2512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 309 of 379 Paul C. Riz"z,c)

Associates, Illc.

[ ]-C INEERS {i4 CIONS ULT.ANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF l616A Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Cleanup System FE l61 6 KI Source Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SF l6l64' Plate ID Plate of component SF l6l6^4 General Overall view of component and anchorage StatusFN U

Sheet 310 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 Status'f) N U Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

591',2.5" Room 312 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Horizontally mounted manual valve on -10" pipe.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50ohfor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

x X

X X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 Equip. Class SFP Inlet From SFP 0d. Other - check valve or manual Equipment Description Heat Exchangers Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwalls 3257 and 3267 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBWI6-8001-083, Rev 2 (4/27/88) and VBWI6-8001-084, Rev 5 (4/27/88).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Sheet31 of 379 Status(?)N u valve N/A 7t25120t2 712512012 X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions 1 l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffiich Date:

Date:

Sheet 312 of 379 Paul C. Rizza Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6.. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Status@N U SF47 plate ID Plate of component SF47 general General view of component

Sheet 3 l3 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SF47 status(?)x u Equipment Description SFP Inlet From SFP Heat Exchangers Equip. Class 0d. Other - check valve or manual valve Sf:17 adjacent block wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SPl7A7 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Sheet 314 of379 statusQN u Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves CODE SAFETY VALVE SPI7A7 Floor El.

643 Room 602 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Valve and main linefoundwith no signs of corrosion.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X

X X

X

pcte Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTAI{TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SPI7A7 Equipment Description of 379 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated CODE SAFETY VALVE SPI7A7 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

x X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Sheet315 Status(?)N u Valves N/A 712512012 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

, r-,#rrru/

Adam L. Helffrich

pc\\t?

Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SWl399 Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

INTK Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Sheet 316 of 379 Status:QN U Equip. Class MOV SW-1399 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Floor El.

566.2s Room 53 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorase free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A X

X X

X

Sheet 317 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULT.ANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(?)N u Equipment ID No.

SWl399 Equipment Description Equip. Class MOV SW-1399 8A. Motor-Operated Valves Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Attached lines found with adequate flexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

NiA N/A X

X x

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 712512012 7/2512012

Sheet 318 of379 Paul C. Rizzt, Associates, Inc.

ENGINEE.RS 6{" CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW 1399 Equip. Class StatusG)N u Equipment Description 8A. Motor-Operated Valves MOV SW-1399 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW 1399 plate ID Plate of component SW 1399 general General view of component

P(}e Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW3963 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Sheet 319 of379 StatusG)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

INTK RELIEF VALVE SW 3963 Floor El.

566.25 Room 53 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Mounted on insludated pipe. No degraded condition identified.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free oxidation?

of corrosion that is more than mild surface N/A N/A NiA N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Anchorage of supporting main linefound with minor spalled grout.

Judged not to reduce seismic capacity of support base.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 5OYofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {i. CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW3963 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description RELIEF VALVE SW 3963 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

x X

Sheet320 of 379 status(DN U Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Scaffold is the area is properly restrained.

x Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Date:

Eddie M. Guerra i / t,4"/

iil'rttt/ Fr{frrW Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 321 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS G.. CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW3963 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description RELIEF VALVE SW 3963 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW3963 Plate ID Plate of component Status(?)N U SW3963 General General view of component

Sheet 322 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Lnc.

ENGTNEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW-5896 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves StatusG)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB CTRM EMERG COND I-I Floor El.

638 Room 603 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small valve on -2.5" diameter pipe. Pipe span <-6.5'with rigid supports.

from one end of the span. Valve height -24". OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surFace oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N Y

Value is -12" N

Y N

Y U

N Y

U N/A N/A N/A U

N/A U

N Y

X X

PC?

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW-5896 Equipment Description CTRM Sheet 323 of 379 StatusON U Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves EMERG COND I-I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y X

Other Adverse Conditions I L Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra 11/

i /. t,/i'- /

bem// F/k'"A Date:

7125/2012 Date:

7t25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 324 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS 6{. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW-5896 Equip. Class 7. Pneumatic-Operated Valves Equipment Description CTRM EMERG COND I-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW5896 general General view of comPonent StatusON U

Sheet 325 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUITANTS Statr,rs(f) N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW82 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

INTK MANUAL VALVE SW 82 Floor El.

565 Room 251 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Small manual valve on -12" diameter insulated pipe. Pipe is rigidly supported at about three pipe diamters on either side of valve. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

is more than mild surface Y

Y Y

NiA N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y X

X X

X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. SW82 Equipment Description MANUAL VALVE SW 82 Sheet 326 of 379 Equip. Class 0d. Other - checVmanual Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

status(f)N u

valve N/A N/A N/A Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 327 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS d.. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

SW82 Equip. Class 0d. Other - check/manual valve Equipment Description MANUAL VALVE SW 82 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

SW82 Plate and General Overall view of component StatusON U

Sheet 328 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

ENCINEERS & CIONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T10 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Statustil)N U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB BORATED WATER STORAGE TANK I-I Floor El.

565 Room PT Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage L Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

No missing parts identified.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Slight surface rust on one anchor bolt. OK.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50oh for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Tank anchorage verffiedfrom drawing C-34-147 and SQUG calculation C-CSS-TL0 showing 48 - 2.s"diam. Bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A X

X X

X

Sheet 329 of 379 Paul C, Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS E. CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description BORATED WATER STORAGE TANK I-I status(V)N u Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Temporary maintenance equipment identified in the area but no significant potential interaction was expected.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions 1 l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

ruL,(il,d; 7t25/2012 Eddie M. Guerra 7l2sl20l2 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 330 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENG IN EERS et. C--ONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl0 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description BORATED WATER STORAGE TANK I-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

t r. a

,,. a t ;

BWST General ID Plate of component StatusON U BWST Anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 331 of379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Tl2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status:ON U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK, T12 Floor El.

623 Room 501 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Horizontal tank on two saddles with cross bracing anchored to short concrete pedestals.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

A small gap -I/4" found between a nut and washer at one anchor location.

Judged not to be a significant adverse condition.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

See item 6 below.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage veriJication based on SQUG calculation C-CSS-Tl2 showing 8 - I" diam bolts.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Hairline crack on one of the concrete pedestals. Judged not a significant adverse condition NiA N/A N/A N/A x

X X

X

Sheet 332 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Tl2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK, TI2 Status(?\\N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Adjacent pipe lines running close to tank judged not an adverse condition N/A NiA N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

. 4 t

/ /.. t, / i ' t ' /

t'h/rrrr/ {t{/lttr 7125120t2 Date:

7/25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 333 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [nc.

ENCINEERS & CONSITLTANTS Seismic \\ilalkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T12 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLTNG SURGE TANLK,TIZ T12 plate ID Plate of component Tl2 general General view of component StatusG)N u Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 334 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {i. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Tl2 Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Status(?-)N u Equipment Description COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK,TIZ Tl2 anchorage typical Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Tl2loose bolt front right Anchor bolt coming loose on the front right of component

Sheet 335 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS G( CONSUUTANTS Seismic \\ilalkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Tl2 Equipment Description Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers StatusG)N u COMPONENT COOLING SURGE TANLK,TI2 Tl2 Pedestal with Minor Hairline Crack

Sheet 336 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUXTANTS Status@N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl53-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

YARD EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I. FOR EDG I-I PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND Floor El.

YARD Room YARD N/A N/A Manufacturer, Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Tank partially buried, unable to view anchorage.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None observed.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed, anchorage not accessible.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed, anchorage not accessible.

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50vofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

Sheet 337 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {i. C]ONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Tl53-1 Equipment Description status(?\\N u Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-I, PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N/A N/A X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SQUG Calc C-CSS-TL53-I concludes anchorage and attached lines are adequate.

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Adam L. Helffrich 7t25t20r2 7t25t20r2

?'t#'/'

RPaul

c. R.izzo.-Ass.ciares, l^c.

E\\-cINEERS

& CONSL;lll Ar*T 5 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T I 53-I Equip. Class 2 I. Tanks and Heat Exchangers Sheet 338 of 379 StatusffiN U Equipment Description EDG FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK I-I, FOR EDG PARTIALLY BELOW GROUND Other supporting or relevant docuntents and photos (if any):

T l 5 3 - lGeneral General View of Component

pcte Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {. CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T46-I Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Sheet 339 of 379 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Each tank saddle anchored with 4-3/4" ancltor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion oxidation?

Anchoragefound in good condition.

that is more than mild surface No signs of corrosion identified.

Y Y

Y

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%o for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage vertfiedfrom SQUG calc C-CSS-746-I and drawing C-0213A for two saddles and 4-3/4"diam bolts at each support.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NiA Y

S1a1usff)N U Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK 1-I, FOR EDG 1-I Floor El.

585 Room 32lA X

X X

X x

X

Sheet 340 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T46-l Equipment Description status(?)N U Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I. FOR EDG I-I Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwalls 305D and 306D verified to be to be seismically adequate based on refs.

VBWI2-8001-065, Rev 5 (4/21/88) and VBWI2-8001-066, Rev 6 (8/26/87)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

7t2st20r?

Eddie M. Guerra

,g.r,///,'W'/'

7t25120t2 Adam L. Helfhich

Sheet 341 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

En*GINEERS 6r CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T46-l Equip. Class 21. Tanks and Heat Exchangers statusG\\N u Equipment Description EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

T46-l plate ID Plate of component T46-l general General view of component

Sheet 342 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T46-l Equipment Description Status/?\\N U Equip. Class 2l. Tanks and Heat Exchangers EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR DAY TANK I-I, FOR EDG I-I T46-l anchorage Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors T46-l masonry wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit

Sheet 343 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {. CONSULTANTS Status9N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TE-5329 Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Floor El.

585 Room 3 1 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very small temperature element mounted on a strut channel with two I/4" diameter channel nuts. The strut channel is then anchored to a block wall with two 3/8" diameter anchor bolts. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y Y

X X

PCePaul C. Rizzo Associates,

[nc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seisrnic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TE-5329 Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Sheet 344 of 379 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Component is anchored to Block Walls 308D/309D. Seismic adequacy verified by calculations VBWI2-8001-068, Rev 3 (5/27/8I) and VBlItI3-8001-069, Rev 3 (5/28/81)

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X x

X X

Status(f)N u Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

712517012 Date:

7t25/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 345 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

TE-5329 Equip. Class 19. Temperature Sensors Equipment Description EDG RM 3I8 TEMP ELEMENT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

statusG)N u TE5329 plate and general Overall view of component and anchorage

Sheet 346 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statusg N U Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equipment Description Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT Location: Bldg.

AUXB Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Floor El.

638 Room 603 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verifrcation required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Very lightweight temperature switch mounted on a cantilevered rack (HSS 6x6) which anchored tofloor withfour I/2" diameter anchor bolts. The sensor is attached to two channels (to HSS) withfour l/4" diameter channel nuts. OK.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

,s welded strut N/A N/A N/A X

X X

X x

X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, fnc.

EI*GINEERS & CONSU LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. T5-5261 Equipment Description CTRM Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks status/?)N u EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT 347 of379 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwalls 6017, 6107 and 6097 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW3l-8001-164, Rev 3 (2/14/06),

VBW32-8001-168, Rev 2 (5/10/88) and VBW32-8001-167, Rev I (l I/7/84).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

U N

Y U

N Y

U N

Y X

x X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Anchor spacing to other nearby instrument racks was judged adequate.

U N

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

',rfrr,/P' Date:

7/2512012 Date:

712512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 348 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS & C]ONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

T3-5261 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

StatusG)N u T5261 plate ID Plate of component T5261 general General view of component

Sheet 349 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6.. CONSUXTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (S\\ilC)

Equipment ID No.

T5-5261 Equip. Class 18. Instrument (on) Racks Equipment Description CTRM EMERG VENT FAN I TEMP SWT T5261 anchorage View of anchorage Statusfr)N U T5261 block wall Potential interaction hazard from masonry wall near unit

Sheet 350 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS

. CONSU LTANTTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

XCEI-l Equip. Class 4. Transforrners StatusO N U Equipment Description TRANSFORMER CE I-I Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 429 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50oh of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to unit substation EI. The transformer is welded to embed channels with stitch welds at one side and plug welds at the opposite side.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration evaluated in SQUG calculations C-CSS-CEI-L Based on page 6 of 11 of C-CSS-DFI-2, confirmed that one and C-CSS-DF I -2 and found acceptable.

side has two 3/8" thick, 3.5" long welds and opposite side has plug welds.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A x

X X

x

pc.e Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

XCEl-l Equip. Class 4. Transforrners Equipment Description TRANSFORMER CE I-I Sheet 351 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazard indetified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

of379 StatusON U Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra

/

,,1/

J

/

t

'/,t

'/

t/d,/ff/ Fr,{kt?

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 352 of 379 Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS {I. C]ONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status(flN u Equipment ID No. XCEI-I Equipment Description Equip. Class 4. Transformers TRANSFORMER CE I-I Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

XCE-I Plate ID Plate of component XCE-I General General view of component

Paul C. Ri zzo Associates, lnc.

ENG INEERS d{ CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XCEI - I Equip. Class Equipment Description TRANSFORMER CE

4. Transformers l - l Sheet3s3of 379 StatusFN U

XCE-I Stitch Partial view of anchorage, view Weld is typical of all anchors

Sheet 354 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS {L CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XDFI-2 Equip. Class TRANSFORMER DF Statusff)N U

4. Transforrners Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB t-2 Floor El.

603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Attached to unit substation Fl. The transformer is welded to embed channels with stitch welds at one side and plug welds at the opposite side.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

As-installed anchorage configuration evaluated andfound adequate in SQTJG calculation C-CSS-DFI-2.

Based on page 6 of I I of C-CSS-DFI-2, confirmed that one side has two 3/8" thick, 3.5" long welds and opposite side has plug welds.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A N/A X

X X

X x

X

of 379 Paul C. Rizzc Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

XDFI-2 Equip. Class Equipment Description TRANSFORMER DF

4. Transforrners t-2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strucfures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

No potential interaction hazard indetified in the area.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Sheet35s StatusFN U N/A N/A 7t25t20t2 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,j"'o/P; Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 356 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6t CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

XDFI-2 Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description TRANSFORMER DF I-2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

XDFI-2 Plate ID Plate of component Status@N U XDFI-2 General General view of comPonent

Sheet 357 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(;INEIIRS & CONSL;LTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. XDFI-2 Equip. Class Statusf)N u

4. Transformers Equipment Description TRANSFORMER DF I.2 XDF l-2 Stitch Weld Front Unit is stitch welded along the entire front c XDF I -2 No Anchorage Rear No welding apparent on rear of component as used on the front of the unit front of the component

Sheet 358 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULIA}STS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (StilC)

Equipment ID No.

Yl05 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Status:ON U Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 429 EDG 1-l DISCONNECT SWITCH FOR C3615 inside PNL Yl Manufacturer, Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inside Panel YI. Panel mounted with four 3/4" anchors.

No degraded condition found.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

None observed during walkdown.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

None observed during walkdown.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

None observed during walkdown-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

X x

X X

PC.e Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Yl05 Equip. Class 20. Instrument and Control Panels Equipment Description EDG l-l DISCONNECT SWITCH FOR C3615 inside PNL Yl 359 of 379 Status'f)N U

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Top bracing provided by top entry conduit.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

,. ) o i

/

' t ) " /

tn*r,r/ !/r/,6'////

Date:

7125/2012 Date:

7/2512012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 360 of 379 Paul C" Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS S. CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Y2 N

Y U

N Y

NiA U

N/A U

NiA U

N/A

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50To for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration is shown seismically adequate in SQUG calculation

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

C-CSS-Y2.

U N

Y statusr?)N U Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description PNL Y2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 428 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel anchored withfour l" diameter anchor bolts and two stffined brackets at one side of the panel which are anchored each with one 3/4" diameter anchor.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

X X

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Y2 Equipment Description PNL Y2 Sheet 361 of 379 status(f)N u Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Top entry conduits are rigidly connected and provide Iateral restraint.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

NiA NiA X

X X

X Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

7/25/2012 Date:

7tzs/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 362 of 379 Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGTNEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

Y2 Equip. Class PNL Y2 Equipment Description StatusG)N U

14. Distribution Panels Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Y2 plate ID Plate of component Y2 general General view of component

Sheet 363 of 379 Pau[ C. Ri zzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. C]ONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Y2 Equip. Class PNL Y2 Equipment Description StatusG)N u

14. Distribution Panels Y2 #orase Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors Y2 anchorage one side only Additional anchorage on outside of the unit, on one side only

PCe Pau[ C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YEZB Equip. Class 4. Transforrners Sheet 364 of 379 statuff)t U

Equipment Description 240-I2OV TRANSFORMER Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

585 Room 304 Manufacturer. Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Transformer is located tnside MCC YE2. 3 Section MCC, typical MCC anchorage.

(i.e. MCC connected to its inverted base channels with 3/8" diameter bolts and the base channel is stitch welded to the embedded channel in concretefloor)

No adverse condition identifiedfor stitch weld of cabinet.

N/A X

X X

X

Pc\\e Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS & CONSUXIANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transforrners Equipment Description 240-I2OV TRANSFORMER Sheet status(?)N u Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, dishibution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Rigid conduits on end have rigid supports and will provide lateral restraint

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

N Y

X x

X X

of 379 Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

N Y

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

7/25/2012 Date:

7/2s/2012 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 366 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 240-I2OV TRANSFORMER Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YE2B Plate ID Plate of component Status(?\\N u YEZB General General view of component

R p.lul.t_. Rizz. l{,,ss.ci:l!g:! 1,....

t : \\ ( ; l N l i I : R \\ \\

( ( ) N \\ t l I. \\ N I \\

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. YE2B Equip. Class 4. Transformers Equipment Description 24O.I2OV TRANSFORMER YE2B stitch Partial view of anchorage, view Sheet 361 of 379 status{mN u weld is typical of all anchors

pcte Paul c. Rizzo Associates, lnc.

ENGINERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YFI Equipment Description Location: Bldg.

AUXB Sheet 368 of379 statu{TJ N u Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels MCC YFI, Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2 Floor El.

585 Room 3 1 9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

in line with MCC FI28 welded to embeded channel with an average of at least 5" of 3/16" fillet welds at front and back.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50yofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG calculations C-CSS-YFI and C-CSS-FL28 verifies seismic adequacy of the as-built anchorage configuration.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/A N/A X

X X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YFI Equip. class 14. Distribution panels Equipment Description MCC YFI, Emergency Diesel Generator Room 2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

369of 379 statusoN u N/A N/A 7/2s/2012 7/25t20r2 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated bv:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

Date:

Adam L. Helffrich

RPaul

c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YFI Equip. Class 14. Distribution Panels Equipment Description MCC YFI, Emergency Diesel Generator Room2 other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YFI Plate ID Plate of component Sheet 370 of 379 StatusG)N u YFI General General view of component

pc'tte Paul c. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

En-GINEERS & CONSULTANTS Sheet 371 of379 Status:${ U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YRF2 Equip. Class

16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Rectifier YRF2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

Room 428 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50o/o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The equipment is in a line with other cabinets D2P and YV2. The internal connection of these panels was verified. Each of these panels are anchored to the concretefloor withfour I" diameter anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50Yo for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV2 references YRF2 with no anchorage concerns.

YRF2 is referenced as lighter and exact same cabinet as YV2.

The seismic qualifi,cation of the line-up that consists of YRF2, D2P and YV2 is in SQUG calculation C-CSS-D2P.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

603 N/A N/A X

X X

x X

X

Sheet Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CIONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YRF2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Rectifier YRF2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Nearbyfire extinguisher not strapped to wall. Judged not to be a significant interaction.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Top entry conduits have adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X x

Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and adversely affect the safety found no other seismic conditions that could functions of the equipment?

372of 379 stams$N u N/A N/A 7/25t20t2 X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M.

Date:

,/k'i*

Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 373 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6( CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YRF2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Status:Qr{ U Equipment Description Regulating Rectifier YRF2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YRJ2 plate ID Plate of component YRF2 general General view of component

Sheet 374 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YRF2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Status:$r{ U Equipment Description Regulating Rectifier YRF2 YRFI open connected to DIP Corresponding train I component opened to view internal bolting

PCe Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUTTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Inverter YV2 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

603 Room 428 Manufacturer. Model. Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

The equipment is in a line with other cabinets D2P and YRF2. The internal connection of these panels was verified. Each of these panels are anchored to the concretefloor withfour I" diameter anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

Sheet 375 of379 Status(?)N u X

X

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that oxidation?

No significant corrosion identifeid is more than mild surface N/A N/A

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The seismic qualification of the line-up that consists of YRF2, D2P and YV2 is in SQUG calculation C-CSS-D2P.

SQUG calculation C-CSS-YV2 indicates FCR 86-0272 implemented to resolve a pounding concern.

No gap observed between cabinets, confirming FCR 86-0272.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

X X

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCINEERS d( CONSULTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YV2 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Regulating Inverter YV2 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strucfures?

No maintenance equipment identified in the area.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Y x

Y X

Sheet 376of379 status(?)N U Other Adverse Conditions I l. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y X

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

7l2s/2012 Date:

7t25/20t2 Adam L. Helffrich

Sheet 377 of 379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E N GTNEERS d'r CONSL;LTA i*-TS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Statusf)N u Equipment Equipment ID No. YVz Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Description Regulating Inverte r YY2 Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

YV2 plate ID Plate of component YVZ general General view of component YVz 4 anchor bolts Partial view of anchorage, view is typical of all anchors

Sheet 378 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS 6. CONSULTANTS statusQ{ u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YV4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description I2sVDC/I2OVAC INVERTER CH 4 Location: Bldg.

AUXB Floor El.

Room 4288 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

l. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50Yo of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

This panel is part of a line-up that includes D2N and YRF4. Each panel is anchored to the concrete withfour 3/4" diameter anchor bolts.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50o/ofor which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

SQUG Calculation C-CSS-YV4 indicates four 3/4" anchors and that MOD-95-0034 resolves a pounding concern.

Anchorage and implementation of MOD-95-0034 were confirmed during walkdown

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

603 U

N Y

X X

X x

Sheet 379 of379 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINERS & CONSUUTANTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.

YV4 Equip. Class 16. Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description IZSVDCII2OVAC INVERTER CH 4 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Seismic capacity of blockwalls in the area verified.

Blockwall 4016 verified to be to be seismically adequate based on ref. VBW20-8001-100, Rev 14 (12/6/88).

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

X X

StatusQ'{

U Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

X Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Eddie M. Guerra

'#"'/P '#

Adam L. Helffrich

ML13340A162

Text

Navigation menu

Search