ML13008A055

Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Seismic Walkdown Report, Appendix C: Area Walk-by Checklists, Sheet 86 of 212 Through End

ML13008A055
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	09/28/2012
From:	Beigi F, Guerra E, Lucarelli B, Reddington J, Reny D ABS Consulting, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-12-283
Download: ML13008A055 (129)

Text

~IŽQ~Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I ANIINIRS

&. CONSI I TANUS~

Sheet 86 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

T Room FULB 741 HX Room Floor El.

741 Bldg.

FULB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays and piping in the area found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2FNC-E21A 2FNC-RVIOl 2FNC-TIIO1A 2FNC-TI102A

'RC-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGjINEERS

& CONSULTAN-rS Sheet 87 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room FULB 741 HX Room Floor El.

741 Bldg.

FULB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A I x Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

NI\\(IM IURS& CO.N'. IIANVI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room FULB 741 HX Room Sheet 88 of 212 Status:

(Y)

N U

Floor El.

741 Bldg.

FULB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-3-29.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Heat Exchangers File Name: 1-60-2-3-29jpeg

==

Description:==

View of cable trays in the area

FV`Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FNGINEERS & CONS( ITAXI S Sheet 89 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(W)

N U

Room FULB 741 HX Room Floor El.

741 Bldg.

FULB Hile Name: l-b3-2-i-29.Jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Heat Exchanger mounted on saddle supports File Name: 1-66-2-3-29.jpeg

==

Description:==

Nearby floor mounted pipe supports.

L Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I N(INEERS N LýNl I T1IAN-1 5

Sheet 90 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room IAC Room Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Wall mounted panels and instrument panels in the area were identified to be in good condition. Unit heater and instrument air tank were identified to be good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping in the area was identified to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-MOVlJ9

Ivli%"

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSI:L1AN YS Sheet 91 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

N U

Room JAC Room Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

Q ;Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ING INtMIR& 10,"M I rAMSl Sheet 92 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

N U

Room IAC Room Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-5-3-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-5-3-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

Fire extinguisher and floor mounted supports for room pipe lines.

~Iqr Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINE[RS & CONSUTTAN TS Sheet 93 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room Intake Cubicle C Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Y N

U N/A

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of x

potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y N

U N/A

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant X

degraded conditions?

Surface rust noticed on most of 12-7/8" diameter machine bolts attaching pump 2SWS-P21B to base plate. Judged not to present a significant structural concern.

Y N

U N/A

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit X

raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Y N

U N/A

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial X

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2HVW-FN257A 2SWS-EJM221A 2SWS-PC V118

rX Q Paul C. Rizzo Absociates, Inc.

I N(INFER',& CONSI I [A*I'1 Sheet 94 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room Intake Cubicle C Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L2-Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E NGINEERS & CONSUL TANXS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 95 of 212 N

U Status:

(Y)

Room Intake Cubicle C Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: INTKCUB C(1).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: INIK_1UBC(2).Jpg

==

Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area

'RC~ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, 111C.

I %*MINLLRS

& CONSI ITAN-rS Sheet 96 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(9)

Room Intake Cubicle C Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS rue iName: nN i &,_tuntAL3).Jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: INTK CUBC(4).jpg

==

Description:==

Surface rust identified on small pipe support.

L~Y~Paul C. Rizz Asbociates, Inc.

ENG.INEERS & CONMA TANT1S Sheet 97 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

N U

Room Intake Cubicle C Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS File Name: INTKCUB C(5).jpg

==

Description:==

Surface rust identified on bolts for Pump 2SWS-P2 1 B.

File Name: INTKCUB C(6).jpg

==

Description:==

Surface rust identified on bolts for Pump 2SWS-P21 B.

LDYNj Paul C. Rizzo Associates,, Inc.

INGINFUIRS, C ON'1 IIANIS Sheet 98 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

N)

Room Intake Cubicle D Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Fuel oil tank identified to be adequately anchored Unit heaters were identified to be rigidly supported Fire pump in the area identified to be adequately anchored

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2HVW-MOD2 JA 2SWS-57 2SWS-P21A 2SWS-PT-117,A MCC-2-EOI

1--N-

< Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

I X61NEIFRS & CON¶StITAN IS Sheet 99 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room Intake Cubicle D Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

Fuel oil in the area is considered the ignition source. Fuel oil tank identified to be adequately anchored

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary scaffold in the area was identified to be well braced andjudged not to present an interaction concern with nearby components.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

LTiyŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 100 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room Intake Cubicle D Floor El.

705 Bldg.

INTS Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

r ie N ame: i Ni &L, u tUu(t).jpg

==

Description:==

View of expansion joint located on pipe attached to vertical Pump 2SWS-P21A.

File Name: INTK CUBD(2).jpg

==

Description:==

General view of instruments in the area

L K' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CON*ULTAITS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room Intake Cubicle D Floor El.

705 Bldg Sheet 101 of 212 Status:

W N

U INTS File Name: INTKCUBD(3).jpg

==

Description:==

View of PVC pipe connected to vertical pump 2SWS-P2 lB.

L Y

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

lUNG INLI[RS& CO)NSI 4TAN'tS Sheet 102 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room Main Steam Room El 778 Floor El.

778 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Pipes, ducts and conduits in the area were identified to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

777-1 Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2FWS-HYV157A 2SVS-HCV104

~ZYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Asbiociates, Inc.

tNGIANEERS &. CONSI 11ANt¶S Sheet 103 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

N U

Room Main Steam Room El 778 Floor El.

778 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No.flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

F I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

D Y Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.

I N(IN[tERS & CONSI ITANIrS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 104 of 212 Status:

()

N U

Room Main Steam Room El 778 Floor El.

778 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-6-3-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

L*YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I N(INEERS& (&ONSU ITANIS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 105 of 212 N

U Status:

(2)

Room Main Steam Room El 789 Floor El.

789 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping and ducts in the area were identified to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2MSS-AOVIO1A 2MSS-SOV105A

L'YC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I \\G NUE R5 CONEI II ANIS Sheet 106 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room Main Steam Room El 789 Floor El.

789 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

F Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

J

/

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 4

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

a C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IFNGINEERS

& CONWLWITA-N Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 107 of 212 Status:

(Y)

N U

Room Floor El.

Main Steam Room El 789 789 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-7-3-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

Ž qC P'aul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 108 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room Main Steam Room Upper Plat.

Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Pipes, ducts and conduits in the area were identified to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2MSS-SVIOIA 2SVS-PCVIO1A

L~ZŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IM LNGEERS&

CONSUITANtrS Sheet 109 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y)

N U

Room Main Steam Room Upper Plat.

Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/20 12

DŽC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, I nc.

Sheet 110 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room Main Steam Room Upper Plat.

Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

rue iName: i-a-z-i-uo.Jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area rte Niame: i-ou-a-i-uo.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

LŽC~QPaul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

I NGINEERS &. CON$UIT&NMS Sheet 111 of 212 U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Several valves were identified with moderate surface corrosion: 2SWS-MOV160, 2SWS-MOVI62 and 2SWS-MOV152-1. CR-2012-14449, CR-2012-14450 and CR-2012-14452 were issued to address these conditions. Valve 2SWS-MO VI 61 is rather a heavy MOV that is attached to bonnet with 4-3/8" diam bolts. These bolts are moderately corroded. CR-2012-14455 issued to address this condition. Surface rust on valve 2BOC-AOV-IOOA I judged not to be a concern.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

I Y

N U

N/A x

I Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-MOV150-1 2CVS-SOV102 2CVS-SOV151A 2RCS-AOVIO1

`11Y

Ž Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

INCINI4R& CONNI 1JAN15 Sheet 112 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y (8

U Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

DOD Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSL[TANTS Sheet 113 of 212 G

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of storage cart and waste drums in the area.

These were identified to be properly secured.

[*--*

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

fN'(INI'rRS & C'ON-1-TANI S Sheet 114 of 212 (E

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV File Name: 1-65-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of restrained storage cart File Name: 1-66-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of restrained container

Sheet 115 of 212 IXYŽQ Paul C. Rizzo A"-ociates, Inc.

t NGINFERS & L()NSLTUINITS Status:

Y 0

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room Floor El.

MSCV 718 718 Bldg.

MSCV File Name: 1-67-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of large diameter pipes File Name: 1-68-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Surface rust identified for valve 2SWS-MOV 162.

CR-2012-14450 issued for this finding.

DcŽQj Paul C. Rizzo Absociates, I nc.

I NGINFERS &. CO)NS(I I TAN-US Sheet 116 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y (a

U Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV File Name: 1-69-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Deficiency tag identified for 2SWS-MOV 160.

CR-2012-14449 issued for this situation.

File Name: 1-70-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Deficiency tag identified for 2SWS-MOV 152-1.

CR-2012-14452 issued for this situation.

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

LNGINEERS & CONSULT;ANS Sheet 117 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y 0*)

U Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV File Name: 1-71-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Corrosion identified on base of 2BDG-AOVIOOB 1.

Judged not a seismic concern.

File Name: 1-72-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Corrosion identified on base of 2SWS-MOV161. Bolts appeared to be undersized. CR-2012-14455 was issued to address this situation.

L~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 118 of 212 U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV File Name: 1-74-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

2BDG-AOV-1 OOA identified with mild surface corrosion.

T11140M "m nt

-;-im r e iName: i-t-i-/ -izL.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold located in the area

L Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I:NGINEERS & CONSI LTANTs Sheet 119 of 212 0

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room MSCV 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

MSCV File Name: 1-76-2-3-12.jpeg

==

Description:==

Tag and signature for scaffold meeting seismic requirements.

~ŽQPaul C. Rizzi, Associates, Inc.

FN(;INE ER', & CONSI IJANi',

Sheet 120 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W)

Room MSCV East 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays identified to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fire hose station presents potential interaction with Panel 2PU-47. The panel is not a CA T I panel and the potential interaction was judged acceptable.

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A xII Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2RCS-PT440

DIYŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGI.NEERS & CONSULT&VTS Sheet 121 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y N

U Room MSCV East 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~ŽQjPaul C. Rizzo Asbociates, 111C.

t NINI tRS& C.ONW(IIANIS Sheet 122 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W Room MSCV East 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Pile Name: 1-)9-2-3-14.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-6U-2-3-14.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

L--

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I NGINEERS & CONSULTAN.I'S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room MSCV East 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

Sheet 123 of 212 Status:

(2)

N U

MSCV rue Name: I-03:--J-14.jpeg

==

Description:==

Fire hose station located near panel 2PU-47. Judged not a seismic concern

'Wir Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

I'.( NEFR&

CONI.LITANIS Sheet 124 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W*

Room MSCV West Floor El.

735 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Fluorescenifixture chain could present potential for interaction with instrument rack in the area. Judged non-damaging.

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

MCC-2-E05

L~YŽPaul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

FNCINEERS & (ONSUL IANYS Sheet 125 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

T N

U Room MSCV West Floor El.

735 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

7 I

I Y

N U

N/A x

I I

Y N

U x

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L qqC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

lPNGINE'.IR*. & CONSt I11AN'I Sheet 126 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room MSCV West Floor El.

735 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

trle Name: l-.iL-2-3-13.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area Vile Name: l-6u-2-3-13.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of cable trays in the area

'VCŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(.INEERS & CONSULTAN-B Sheet 127 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

AXLB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

A north-south support on the discharge piping of the pump 2CCP-1156 is not in place (2CCP-PSSP-320B) and eliminated per DCP-1135. Similar support is in place for 2CCP-1157 is in place. Pipe stress calculation for this piping was reviewed and it was confirmed that the deleted support is not modeled in the stress analysis.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Monorail identified with locked trolley. Judged not to present an interaction concern.

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-27A 2CCP-4 2CCP-P21A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

=I Y

N U

N/A x

I Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

[-NGINFERS

& coNst *i TAN-r Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 128 of 212 Status:

T)

N U

Room N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

AXLB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Drums and maintenance equipment found in the area to be properly secured. No concern for seismic interaction was identified

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/Z "

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

I I Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E\\(NINEERS & C-'ONSILTATNT-S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 129 of 212 Status:

(Y)

N U

Room N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

AXLB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-5-3-03.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area Pile Name: i-tO-)-i-U-.jpeg

==

Description:==

Trolley identified in the area to be securely restrained

Ž qC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENG(INEERS

& CON'.I TANIS Sheet 130 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W)

Room N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

AXLB rlie iame: 1-to-3-u-.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of insulated pipe lines.

File Name: 1-68-5-3-03.jpeg

==

Description:==

Restrained drums located in the area

'4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

tNGINEERS &, CO)NStITANIS Sheet 131 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

N U

Room N-EAST 2 AXLB 735 Floor El.

735 Bldg.

AXLB File Name: 1-69-5-3-03.jpeg

==

Description:==

Restrained storage cart located in the area File Name: 1-f i-3-i-ui.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of fire lines in the area

~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FN(;.NFHS',& CON~'I IIANI',

Sheet 132 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room RSS Cubicle Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping and conduits in the area were found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2QSS-MO VIO1A

L~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

INGtINEEM & CONILLT NTS Sheet 133 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(R)

Room RSS Cubicle Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

F N( NFERS& COUFN'I I1.AVI-Sheet 134 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W Room Floor El.

RSS Cubicle 718 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-8-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-8-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-P21 A.

Ž Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E\\NGINEERS& C(ONS lITANI*S Sheet 135 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(

N U

Room RSS Cubicle Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB File Name: 1-65-8-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-P2 IA.

tile Name: l--0-6-J-2-.jpeg

==

Description:==

Recirc Spray Pump 2RSS-P2 IA plate ID.

[ŽQj Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IN N(IEFRS & (O[NS1 H'AN I S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room RSS Cubicle Sheet 136 of 212 Status:

(Y)

N U

Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB itle Name: 1-67-8-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

Insulated line attached to 2RSS-P21 A.

~Q Paul C. Rizzo A"-ociates, Inc.

EMGINEERS& CONWIIT&VtS Sheet 137 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room SFGB 741 Cubicle A Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Panels in the area are well supported.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Ducts in the area identified to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2FWE-FEIOIA

L~Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, 111C.

Sheet 138 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W)

N U

Room SFGB 741 Cubicle A Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

C 7:;/

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L['Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

UNK(; NEERS & CONSU[TAN*1S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 139 of 212 Status:

(2)

N U

Room SFGB 741 Cubicle A Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-60-3-3-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area

L-w-NDqC Paul C. Rizzo As~sociates, Inc.

I\\(.INFERS¶& CONSVIIP&1S Sheet 140 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room SFGB 741 Cubicle C Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Wall mounted instruments in the area are identified to be in good condition.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Ducts and conduits in the area are identified to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2FWE-HCVIOOD

L~IYŽPaul C. Riz..~cit~

Inc.

ING.INEERS & 1XINIt TA1NTS Sheet 141 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

N U

Room SFGB 741 Cubicle C Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold in the area is well braced

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Dt:1/021 Date:

10/10/2012

L Y

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I MAINFERS& CON'I IT NI S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room SFGB 741 Cubicle C Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 142 of 212 Status:

(Y)

N U

File Name: 1-60-4-3-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area

L1V Y Ž%

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, 1I1C.

'RCFNGINEERS

& CONSI:ITANlS Sheet 143 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W)

Room SFGB Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Surface rust identified at two support rods on suction nozzle to 2QSS-P21A. Judged not to present an adverse seismic condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Potential interaction between a light fixture and 3/8" diam steam line. This is judged not to be a concern. Fluorescent light tube over 2QSS-FIS-I O1A may potentially dislodge and interact. This is judged credible but not significant.

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2FWE-P22 2FWE-P23A 2SIS-1 2SIS-P21A

'AC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, bic.

FN(',tNF RS&~ CUNSIIUAVlS Sheet 144 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(R)

N U

Room SFGB Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regardingfire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

A support rod at discharge nozzle of pump 2QSS-P21A is not in place. A tag on the post of this rod states deleted Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

I Y

N U

N/A x

I I

Y N

U x I

[ T Brian A. Lucarelli Evaluated by:

Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EVt.INFERS& U(-'N'ULTANI' Sheet 145 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room SFGB Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-5-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of fire line located in the area.

File Name: 1-60-5-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of room's ceiling

LXY~ Paul C. Rizzo AssociatcN,, I nc.

Sheet 146 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room SFGB Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB File Name: 1-65-5-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

Hanging light bearing on top of pipe.

hie Name: 1-66-5-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

L~ŽQPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSULTANIS Sheet 147 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y N

U Room SFGB Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB File Name: 1-67-5-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

Mirror located above 2FWE-P23A v-tie Name: i-/u-)-i-z-i.jpeg

==

Description:==

Potential falling of light bulb could impact instrument below.

Judged not a significant interaction.

~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associatcs, Inc.

Sheet 148 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room SFGB Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB File Name: 1-68-5-4-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of deleted support rod for 2QSS-P2 1 A discharge nozzle,

LŽCQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IN'G [NEER$ & W~NSUI'IAN-US Sheet 149 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(T)

Room SFGB 718 UP Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays in the area found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2QSS-MOVI OOA

rlvQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 150 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y)

N U

Room SFGB 718 UP Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No. flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

-- I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A 2~

K V

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

I "C Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & COTNS( TA\\NrS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room SFGB 718 UP Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 151 of 212 Status:

w N

U

L41r_ Paul C. Rizzoj Associates, Inc.

I \\(;1NULS COI

~ &NSI I AN1.

Sheet 152 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room SFGB 718 West Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping and conduits in the area were found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2SIS-MOV863A 2SIS-MOV8811A 2SWS-MOV104A

L'ZYŽ Paul C. Rizzo A~ociates, Inc.

UNG(INFER¶,

& WfNWLAT&W~S Sheet 153 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(C)

Room SFGB 718 West Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold in the area is well braced

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

l MA;NEERS & C*ONSIA:TANlIS Sheet 154 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room SFGB 718 West Floor El.

718 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-7-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of supports for piping in the area Pile Name: I-bU-7-3-23.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

FllZQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

'4C ENINEERS & CONSUITAN IS Sheet 155 of 212 G

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room SFGB 737 Floor El.

737 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

MCC-2-E11

Lc'7Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I \\( INFERS. CON.I MISAV Sheet 156 of 212 U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room SFGB 737 Floor El.

737 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

A 55 gallon drum and one light weight shelve near MCC-2-ElI were identified to be unrestrained Plant personnel were notified and the drum and shelving were immediately tied offl. CR-2012-14420 issued to address this condition.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U I I x I I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 7 Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

LX AD Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

1"(,GINEERS

& CONSI'I1ANIS Sheet 157 of 212 U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room SFGB 737 Floor El.

737 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-3-24.jpeg

==

Description:==

Maintenance equipment and unrestrained drums located in the area near MCC. CR-2012-14420 issued to address the situation.

File Name: 1-60-2-3-24.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of hanging lights in the area.

Paul C. Rizzo Asociates, Inc.

I SN;INtF[RS&

[OS TAY*[

Sheet 158 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y G

U Room SFGB 737 Floor El.

737 Bldg.

SFGB File Name: 1-65-2-3-24.jpeg

==

Description:==

Notice label on top of unrestrained drum near MCC.

L

'qC Paul C. Rizzo A"-ocates, Inc.

f\\(.INEERS & CONSI ITANIS Sheet 159 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(W Room SFGB 741 -PLAT Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2HVR-ACU207A

L~b V-1Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 160 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

N U

Room SFGB 741 -PLAT Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold in the area is well braced. Temporary unrestrained step ladderfJund in the areajudged not a seismic concern.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1/c5 1

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 J

Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

FSheet 161 of 212 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

UNGINEER-S& CONSTLtTAN*S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

N U

Room SFGB 741-PLAT Floor El.

741 Bldg.

SFGB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-3-25.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold located in the area lile Name: i-oU-L-i-L2.jpeg

==

Description:==

Unrestrained ladder identified in the area.

Judged not a seismic concern for nearby equipment.

~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Absociates, Inc.

I '6(,NFFRS1 CONS.I IrIAMS Sheet 162 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room SRVB 780 Floor El.

780 Bldg.

SRVB Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Block wall identified in the area. Calculation S7. 7 shows block wall has been reinforced to adequately sustain seismic effects.

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2FWS-FCV478 2FWS-FCV479

~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUL T&NTS Sheet 163 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room SRVB 780 Floor El.

780 Bldg.

SRVB Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding located in the area was judged not to present an interaction concern with nearby equipment.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

1 Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

=

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/20 12

L"IŽ'

Paul C. Rizzo) Associates, Inc.

I X X11.IMS I(ON.IV IAN Sheet 164 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room SRVB 780 Floor El.

780 Bldg.

SRVB Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-3-27.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-2-3-27.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo A"-ociates, Inc.

f\\LGtNE~RS & CONSUITAN.1S Sheet 165 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room Floor El.

SRVB 780 780 Bldg.

SRVB File Name: 1-65-2-3-27.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold identified in the area File Name: 1-66-2-3-27.jpeg

==

Description:==

Tag for seismic requirements for nearby scaffold

r-vŽ %

Paul C. Rizzo Absowjaces, Inc.

INGINHR W, &

ONII I lANIS Sheet 166 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room SRVB 780 Floor El.

780 Bldg.

SRVB File Name: 1-67-2-3-27.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-68-2-3-27.jpeg

==

Description:==

Block wall identified in the area

~IQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSUITANIS Sheet 167 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W)

Room SWGR Vent Room 773 Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Fans and ducts in the area were.fbund to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x F----F Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2HVZ-DMP215A 2HVZ-FN261A 2HVZ-FN261B

• ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I N;INI MS' & CONSVI I

IANS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 168 of 212 Status:

W N

U Room SWGR Vent Room 773 Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Noflooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Temporary housekeeping equipment identified in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern with nearby components.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A Tr~

/

1~

~

/

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~Q Paul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

Sheet 169 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room SWGR Vent Room 773 Floor El.

773 Bldg.

MSCV Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-9-3-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area vlle Name: i-ou-y-i--o.jpeg

==

Description:==

Equipment found in the area.

L qC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I X%(,

IN[

IUr CONII II '*NIs Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room SWGR Vent Room 773 Floor El.

773 Bldg.

Sheet 170 of 212 Status:

W N

U MSCV File Name: 1-66-9-3-16.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

L~YŽPaul C. Rizzo Asbociates, Inc.

E\\(.IN[ERS & CONSUITANTrs Sheet 171 of 212 U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room Valve Pit A Floor El.

718 Bldg.

VLVP Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Tag No. 63005 on valve 2SWS-MOV562 indicates that the valve has rust and needs to be cleaned and painted. CR-2012-14412 issued to address this condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

All piping in the area is well supported Unit heater identified to be well supported Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2SWS-MOV1O6A 2SWS-PT-113A

~ŽQj Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

INO~NEEPS & CON~I 11Ni Sheet 172 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y (0

U Room Valve Pit A Floor El.

718 Bldg.

VLVP Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

Noflooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~Y~jPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I M.INEERM & CONA1TTAN'TS Sheet 173 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y a

U Room Valve Pit A Floor El.

718 Bldg.

VLVP Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: VLV_-T'1A(1).Jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area rite Name: VLVY IAkL).Jpg

==

Description:==

General view of area

L~Y~ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I N(,INEERS & CON't *1TANIS Sheet 174 of 212 U

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y Room Valve Pit A Floor El.

718 Bldg.

VLVP File Name: VLV_PTA(3).jpg

==

Description:==

Surface rust identified on several MOVs in the area.

• ile Name: VLV_PTA(4).jpg

==

Description:==

Deficiency tag requesting cleanup and painting.

CR-2012-14412 issued to address this finding.

L*--Q Paul C. Rizzo Asociates, Inc.

UN;INEERS& CONSI 'IANI S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 175 of 212 U

Status:

Y Room Yard Floor El.

730 Bldg.

YARD Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion identified on several locations around tank 2QSS-TK21. This is mostly due to humidity in the area. CR-2012-14 744 and CR-2012-14749 were issued to address moderate corrosion identified on valves.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping and conduits in the area were found to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2QSS-297 2QSS-LTIO4A 2QSS-TK21

LYC Paiul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

F \\( INFIIRS &. C)N~t I AN-1I Sheet 176 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y a

U Room Yard Floor El.

730 Bldg.

YARD Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding identified to be well braced

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

I Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L['--j Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUlTAN TS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Sheet 177 of 212 Status:

Y

(*)

U Room Floor El.

Yard 730 Bldg.

YARD Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

iqle Name: i-,-4.-i-2z.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of Tank 2QSS-TK2 1.

ie I

rue iName: i-ou-4-3-z-.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold located in the area.

~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 178 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y (a

U Room Yard Floor El.

730 Bldg.

YARD File Name: 1-66-4-3-29.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-67-4-3-29.jpeg

==

Description:==

Scaffold located in the area.

r-výýSheet 179 of 212 Z

'qC Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

['(GANEERS & CONSULTATNrS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Y U

Room Floor El.

Yard 730 Bldg.

YARD File Name: 1-68-4-3-29.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area

~IŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associatecs, Inc.

Sheet 180 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W)

Room RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle Floor El.

721 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

No degraded conditions were identified

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Piping and cable trays in the area werefiound to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

71 Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-AOVIO7A

"[IŽ

- Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

FNGINUFERS

& CONSI LTAN'S Sheet 181 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

N U

Room RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle Floor El.

721 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding located in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012

-zý Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

--%Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

r X

'%-ENGINEERS& CONSUIIAN"IS Sheet 182 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle Floor El.

721 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-6-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffold in the area File Name:

==

Description:==

1-60-6-3-19.jpeg View of pipe supports and cables hanging in the area

Sheet 183 of 212 L[ ZR Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSUlTA*rS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room RCBX 721-A RCP Pump Cubicle Status:

(2)

N U

Floor El.

721 Bldg.

RCBX File Name: 1-65-6-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffold in the area

L~YŽPaul C. Rizzo Absociates, Inc.

I N(.MLNHRS& Ci)NSI I1.N'T Sheet 184 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room RCBX 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays in the area were Jound to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

ý Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-FT107A 2CCP-PTI07A

L~2)QPaul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS & CONSLITANITS Sheet 185 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room RCBX 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Maintenance equipment found in the area to be properly restrained

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

E:=

Y N

U N/A x

I I

Y N

U x I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~IY~Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I45 1(

INON RS & COW ýITAN-rS Sheet 186 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(ý)

N U

Room RCBX 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-2-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-2-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of maintenance equipment in the area

L~YŽ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EMNGINERS

& CONSITTAN1fS Sheet 187 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

Room RCBX 718 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX rue Iname: i-o>)-L-j-i.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of cable trays in the area.

File Name: 1-66-2-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of vertical cable trays properly supported

LvZYý Paul C. Rizzo Assocateb,, Inc.

Sheet 188 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W Room RCBX 718-Annulus Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Wall mounted supports and instruments were.found in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CCP-MOV112A 2FWS-LT477F

'IC-P~aul C. Rizzo Associatesj, Inc.

I NC.INEEKS & C()NSIVITANI15 Sheet 189 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room RCBX 718-Annulus Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Maintenance carts in the area identified to be securely locked

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/ 10/20 12

Y Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

VNfGINFERS & CONI IT'MN'IS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room RCBX 718-Annulus Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

Sheet 190 of 212 Status:

(w)

N U

rne *Name: 1-a-,-i-I.jpeg

==

Description:==

Temporary outage related maintenance equipment rute cName: l-ou-,4-_3-l.Jpeg

==

Description:==

Temporary outage related maintenance equipment

i-%

'4 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINEERS& CONSULIANTS Sheet 191 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W Room RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs Floor El.

692 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

71 Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2CHS-MOV310

L* ---

Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

(

NMINRS & CONSIITANIS Sheet 192 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(W)

N U

Room RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs Floor El.

692 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Heavy storage boxes and scaffolding were identified in the area. Judged not an interaction concern.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U N/A X

Y N

U x

-F Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~Sheet 193 of 212 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

IN-GINEERS

& CONWMWTA"h Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

)

N U

Room RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs Floor El.

692 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-4-3-17.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of heavy storage boxes in the area.

rile Name:

/-OU-4-j=1i.jpeg

==

Description:==

Fire line located above 2CHS-MOV3 10

~Sheet 194 of 212 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I (INIAEERS & CONS!.I IANI[S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

N U

Room RCBX 692-Near Inner Stairs Floor El.

692 Bldg.

RCBX Pile Name: 1-b3-4-i-1/.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffold in the area

'IC' Paul C. Rizzo Assiociatesi, Inc.

E NGINEERS & CONSIATANPS Sheet 195 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Wall mounted supports and instruments were found in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays in the area were.[fund to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2DAS-AOVIOOA

D O D -Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINE ER' &. (YN'S1 ITAMI~

Sheet 196 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold in the area is well braced.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

I I

I Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U I x I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

(.*

i'>

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L RC' Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENGINFERS 6, CONSU TTAW'S Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room RCBX 718-PEN-724 COL 9 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

Other supporting or r(

Sheet 197 of 212 Status:

W)

N U

RCBX elevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-66-7-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-67-7-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffold in the area

FulQ Paul C. Rizzo A.sociatcs, nc I 'NbINEERS & CO)NS[ TUANI S Sheet 198 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room RCBX 707 Floor El.

707 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Mild surface corrosion identified on anchorage for heat exchangers (2RtHS-E21A and 2RHS-E21B) and pump (2RHS-P2 ]A) in the area. Judged not to present an adverse condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Rod hung supports found in adequate condition. Cable trays in the area were.found to be rigidly supported.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A X

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2RHS-E21A 2RHS-tlCV758A 2Rt1S-P21A 2RHS-R V721A

IY Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

E NGINEFRS & CONSI LTANlIS Sheet 199 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

N U

Room RCBX 707 Floor El.

707 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

==

Y N

U N/A x

=

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

T I

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

~ŽY~ Paul C. Rtizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 200 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W Room RCBX 707 Floor El.

707 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59 2 -18.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-2-2-18.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of sheet metal housing on 2RHS-E21 B and surrounding piping.

~Q Paul C. Rizzo A~ociates, Inc.

I 'NGINEERS & CONS(I &ITATS Sheet 201 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

N U

Room RCBX 707 Floor El.

707 Bldg.

RCBX vile Name: 1-0-5-2-2-I1.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of well braced HVAC ducts in the area rue rName: z-oi-i-L-la.Jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of Heat Exchanger 2RHS-E2 1 B

L~ŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

tMNtERS&

IIbN I*NTANP.F Sheet 202 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

Room RCBX 707 Floor El.

707 Bldg.

RCBX lHle Name: 2-64-3-2-18JIpeg

==

Description:==

General view of ceiling rod hung supports

D

-Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

TN-GINEERS

& L ONSULTANT S Sheet 203 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y Room RCBX 718-A RCP Pump Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Cable trays in the area were found to be rigidly supported

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

17-71 Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2RHS-MOV702A

-- Q~ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

[\\ (NGI tPI1S& MONSI 14I "IN Sheet 204 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(2)

Room RCBX 718-A RCP Pump Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffolding located in the area. Judged not to present an interaction concern.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x I I

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) i7 Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

ICŽQ-Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

I NUINEERS & LONSULTAýNIT Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Room RCBX 718-A RCP Pumn Sheet 205 of 212 Status:

W)

N U

Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-3-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of area File Name: 1-60-3-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffolding in the area

~IŽQ~Paul C. Rizzo Absociates, Inc.

I NG.IIS&

I. AN11 IIANIS Sheet 206 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W Room RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Wall mounted supports for piping and cable trays were identified to be in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A Y

N U

N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2SIS-67

LŽC'Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

1\\(,INFERS & CONWL[TANTS Sheet 207 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Nitrogen bottles and storage boxes were identified to be properly secured in the area.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

E::::::

Y N

U x I I

T Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

........ /

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

L~iŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

UMA(NEERS,

& CINSI I IA I S Sheet 208 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(Y)

Room RCBX 71 8-Annulus Col 4 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 1-59-5-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of cable trays and fire line in the area File Name: 1-60-5-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of nitrogen bottles and storage boxes properly secured in the area

IQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

ENCANEERS

& CON.ULtTANTS Sheet 209 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

W*)

Room RCBX 718-Annulus Col 4 Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX File Name: 1-65-5-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

Temporary outage related maintenance equipment Pile Name: 1-66-5-3-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of wall mounted supports for piping and cable trays.

DCŽQ Paul C. Rizzo Associates, [inc.

I \\M.INIRS, & CON~.I I T&N1' Sheet 210 of 212 N

U Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(D)

Room RCBX 718-B RCP Pump Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Wall mounted supports for piping were identified to be in good condition.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Related equipment on SWEL for this area:

2RHS-MOV72OA

L-V 7Q Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

EN(,INFERLS&~

CONSULTANrS Sheet 211 of 212 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

()

N U

Room RCBX 718-B RCP Pump Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Interaction Effects

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

No flooding concern identified in this area.

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

No concerns identified regarding fire sources.

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Scaffold in the area is well braced.

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U N/A x

Y N

U x

I Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:

Brian A. Lucarelli Date:

10/10/2012 Eddie M. Guerra Date:

10/10/2012

---I*

< Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc.

Sheet 212 of 212 FNGINEERS

& CON'.I ITANTI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Status:

(S)

N U

Room RCBX 718-B RCP Pump Floor El.

718 Bldg.

RCBX Other supporting or relevant documents and photos (if any):

File Name: 2-61-5-2-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

General view of 2RHS-MOV720A File Name: 2-62-5-2-19.jpeg

==

Description:==

View of scaffolding above 2RHS-MOV720A

APPENDIX D: COMPONENT LIST FOR ANCHORAGE CONFIGURATION CHECK Component ID References 2CCP-E21A Drawing 10080-RS-36J 2CCP-FT107A Drawing 12241-BK-16G-8-2F 2CCP-P21A Drawing 12241-RC-36P-9 2CCP-PT107A Drawing 12241-BK-16G-8-2F 2CCP-TK21A Calculation NM(B)-436-IA 2CHS-P21A Drawing 10080-RC-36N and Drawing 10080-RC-36P 2CHS-TK21A Drawing 2003.470-033-011 2EGF-TK22A Drawing 10080-RC-29A and Drawing 10080-RC-29B 2EGS-EG2-1 Drawing 10080-RC-29B 2FNC-E21A Drawing 10080-RC-0038K 2FNC-P21A Drawing 10080-RC-0038K 2FWE-P22 Calculation 12241-NM(B)-678-CZC 2FWE-P23A Drawing 2002.400-208-028 and Calculation 2602.400-208-035C 2HVD-FN270A Calculation NM(B)-521-CZC 2HVZ-FN26iA Calculation NM(B)-521-CZC 2HVZ-FN261B Calculation NM(B)-521-CZC 2QSS-LT 104A Drawing 12241-BK-16G-45-3 2RHS-E21B Drawing 10080-ISI-E-2P 2RHS-P21A Drawing 10880-RV-0052A 2SIS-P21A Drawing 2002.290-001-002 2SWS-P21A Calculation 731-N-0027 2SWS-PT-113A Drawing 12241-BK-16G-17-3K 2SWS-PT-117A Drawing 12241-RK-5J-2 BAT-2-1 Drawing 2001.240-841-034 DC-SWBD2-1 Drawing 2001.260-350-030F MCC-2-E01 Calculation NM(B)-468-CZC MCC-2-E07 Calculation 12241-NM(B)-468-CZC MCC-2-E 11 Calculation 12241 -NM(B)-468-CZC PNL 2DIGEN-1 Calculation 12241-NM(B)-438-CZC PNL DC2-07 Drawing 2001.260-363-082L PNL DC2-19 Drawing 2001.260-363-156A D-1

Component ID References PNL-SEQ-244 Drawing 10080-R TRF-2-8N Drawing 2001.180-307-131 C UPS-VITBS2-1 Drawing SK-E02-0376-E-1-5 UPS-VITBS2-1-REG Drawing SK-E02-0376-E-1-5 D-2