ML110060186
| ML110060186 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek |
| Issue date: | 04/09/2010 |
| From: | Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LR-N10-0355 OP-HC-108-115-1001, Rev 10 | |
| Download: ML110060186 (76) | |
Text
PSEG Internal Use Only PSEG NUCLEAR L.L.C.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 1 of 1 OPERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND EQUIPMENT CONTROL PROGRAM REVISION
SUMMARY
- Clarifies the required action in Exhibit 2 for the RFE/RFE Radiation Monitor inputs. This has been evaluated and is an editorial change. (70107164-0070)
- Adds additional clarification to HPCI/RCIC Jockey pumps on Exhibit 2.
IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Effective Date 4/9/10 None
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 1 of 75 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1 PURPOS E.............................................................................................................3 2 SCOP E..................................................................................................................3 3 RESPONSIBI LITIES.............................................................................................4 4 PROCESS DESCRIPTION...................................................................................6 5 PROCED URE.......................................................................................................7 5.1 Performance of SSC Operability Screening for Conditions Adverse to Quality.......................................................................................................7 5.2 Review of Planned Removal of SSCs from Service for Impact on Operability and Risk [CD-316D, CD-026F, CD-381X]...............................9 5.3 Entry into Active/Tracking Technical Specification (T/S) LCO/LAOT Action Statements....................................................................................11 5.4 Exit from Active/Tracking Technical Specification LCO Action Statements/LAOTs..................................................................................20 5.5 Periodic Audits [CD-536G]......................................................................23 6 RECORD S..........................................................................................................24 7 REFERE NCES....................................................................................................24 ATTACHMENTS Case Studies in Operability............................................................................27 Inoperability of SSCs that are Safety-Related, or Important to Safety...........33 -1 Technical Specification Action Statement Log Index.....................................31 -2 Technical Specification Action Statement Log Index (Electronic Version).....32 Operability Determination (OPEVAL) Log......................................................33 Contingency Plan For Sealing Secondary Containment Penetrations During Fuel Handling And Core Alterations...................................................34
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 2 of 75 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
Section Title Page EXHIBITS Exhibit 1, Planned Removal of Equipment for Service Flowchart.............................................36 Exhibit 2, T/S Implementation And Allowable Outage Times (LAOTs).....................................37 Exhibit 3, Event Driven T/S / ODCM / UFSAR Surveillance Requirement Matrix.....................61 Exhibit 4, Single Failure Criteria For Safety-Related Systems Flowchart.................................65 Exhibit 5, Secondary Containment Penetration Matrix..............................................................66 Exhibit 6, Staggered Test Bases Position.................................................................................69 Exhibit 7, Actions for Missed Surveillance Activities.................................................................70 Exhibit 8, Actions For Implementation of Technical Specification 3.0.4.b.................................71 FORMS Form 1, Technical Specification Action Statement Log.............................................................72
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 3 of 75
- 1.
PURPOSE Administratively control entry and exit from Active and Tracking Technical Specification Action Statements for inoperable Technical Specification equipment.
[CD-026F, CD-536G, CD-537G, C0593]
Although the processes outlined in the body of this procedure do not specifically address their use, the following Exhibits are also provided for use:
Exhibit 2 - Provide Licensee Controlled Allowable Outage Times (LAOTs) for certain equipment not specifically addressed in T/S.
Exhibit 3 - Event Driven T/S / ODCM / UFSAR Surveillance Requirement Matrix Exhibit 5 - Secondary Containment Penetration Matrix
- 2.
SCOPE This procedure applies to Conditions Adverse to Quality (CAQs), Scheduled Maintenance, Surveillance Activities, or following any plant transient(s) which could or have affected the operability of SSCs which are:
o Technical Specifications/LAOT related, or o Safety Related, or o Important to Safety/Q-Listed/Current Licensing Bases.
This procedure describes the mechanisms used to assess SSC operability, including operability screenings for notifications (NOTF) using Operability Determinations (ODs) and Operability Evaluations (OPEVALs),
This procedure triggers the completion or review of Risk Assessments as part of the review of CAQs, and scheduled maintenance or surveillance testing activities that affect the availability of SSCs which are considered Risk Significant IAW OP-AA-101-112-1002, On-Line Risk Assessment.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 4 of 75
- 3.
RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1 Shift Manager/Control Room Supervisor (SM/CRS):
Implements this procedure for Conditions Adverse to Quality (CAQs), Scheduled Maintenance, Surveillance Activities, or following any plant transient(s) which could or have affected the operability of SSCs which are related to Technical Specifications/LAOT/Safety Related/ Important to Safety/Q-Listed/Current Licensing Bases.
Ensures reviews of new Significance Level 1, 2, and 3 (N1) Notifications are completed in a timely manner. To permit the SM/CRS to focus on plant operations this initial review and approval may be performed by any currently licensed SRO (SRO Screener).
Prioritizes work activities, which support repair and return of inoperable SSCs.
Classifies SSCs and screens SSCs for operability and reportability when performing Notification reviews.
Ensures the Technical Specification Action Statement Log is maintained.
Ensures Technical Specifications/LAOT LCO Action Statements are entered appropriately.
Initiates actions to minimize the effects of CAQs on SSCs to ensure the plant is maintained in a safe condition.
Ensures an Operability Determination is performed for applicable SSCs within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of problem identification, or, depending on the complexity, within a reasonable time consistent with the safety significance.
Directs the performance and review of an Operability Evaluation (OPEVAL) for SSCs that are OPERABLE, but degraded or non-conforming.
Notifies the Shift Operations Superintendent (SOS) that an Operability Evaluation has been initiated.
Ensures appropriate Technical Specification requirements are met when a Technical Specification required SSC is declared INOPERABLE due to a CAQ.
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 5 of 75 3.1 (continued)
Ensures appropriate Technical Specification requirements are met prior to removing equipment from service for scheduled maintenance/surveillance. This includes a review of all applicable LCOs, verification of operability of redundant equipment or trains (to ensure the correct Technical Specification LCO Action Statements are being entered for the number of redundant equipment or trains that will be inoperable), and a check for any additional conditions that could impact the removal of the equipment from service.
Implements any required compensatory actions for those SSCs declared INOPERABLE or are being removed from service for scheduled maintenance/surveillance that are not expressly identified in T/Ss to minimize the impact of the condition and ensure the plant is maintained in a safe condition.
Initiates timely retest activities to ensure equipment is restored to an operable condition.
3.2 Shift Operations Superintendent (SOS) or Designee:
Ensures periodic audits of the T/S Action Statement Log Index and Operability Evaluation Log are performed IAW Section 5.5. [CD-536G]
Ensures all Operability Evaluations (OPEVAL) are reviewed by SORC within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> if required.
Ensures significant changes to an OPEVAL are re-presented to SORC, as required.
3.3 SRO Screener:
Reviews new Significance Level (SL) 1, 2, & 3 (N1) NOTFs initiated in accordance with LS-AA-120 Issue Identification and Screening Process, to determine the classification of SSCs, to perform the screening of conditions related to SSCs for Operability, Reportability, and Risk as found in the SAP Functional Location.
Immediately notifies the on-duty SM/CRS of a CAQ which requires an Operability Evaluation (OPEVAL), results in an SSC being inoperable, is reportable, or impacts the Risk Assessment.
3.4 Nuclear Control Operator (NCO):
Complete HC.OP-DL.ZZ-0026(Q), Surveillance Log, Attachment 5 as required by Step 5.3.3.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 6 of 75 3.5 Individual Responsible for Securing Secondary Containment Penetration(s):
Ensuring penetration can be closed within 30 minutes in the event of a Fuel Handling Accident.
Ensuring the CRS is provided with the name of a relief and a method of contact prior to rescinding responsibility and leaving site.
- 4.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION Two processes are defined in this Document:
4.1 SSC Operability Assessment The first process is described in OP-AA-108-115 Operability Determination.
This document provides Site Specific information for Hope Creek and Salem stations 4.2 Technical Specification LCO/LAOT Action Statement Tracking The second process controls entry and exit from Active and Tracking Technical Specification LCO/LAOT Action Statements for inoperable equipment.
This process addresses review and control of performance of planned activities including surveillance, in-service, and functional testing, corrective and preventive maintenance, implementation of Evolution or Troubleshooting Plans, and implementing Work Clearance that and assesses whether the performance of the planned activity will render the SSC INOPERABLE during performance. This review will result in one of the determinations described in the previous bulleted steps except that a determination of OPERABLE but degraded or non-conforming is not considered applicable for planned activities. In the event that the review results in an OPERABLE but degraded or non-conforming determination, the SSC will not be removed form service until further review and actions per WC-AA-101 are performed.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 7 of 75
- 5.
PROCEDURE NOTE: Hardcopy reviews may be used when SAP is not available.
5.1 Performance of SSC Operability Screening for Conditions Adverse to Quality 5.1.1.
For all SL 1, 2, and 3 (N1) NOTFs, documented IAW LS-AA-120 DETERMINE if the SSC described in the Notification meets one of the following SSC Classifications: [CD-504B]
SSC is related to Technical Specifications/LAOT SSC is Safety Related SSC is Important to Safety/Q-listed/Current Licensing Basis SSC is High Energy Line Break (HELB) Related.
ENSURE a thorough review of T/S, UFSAR, SAP Component Classifications Data, and other engineering and licensing documentation in making this determination.
This Screening and Operability Determination should be made within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, OR depending on the complexity, within a reasonable time consistent with its safety significance.
5.1.2. IF the SSC addressed in the NOTF does NOT meet any of the SSC Classifications of Step 5.1.1, THEN DOCUMENT this assessment by selecting Not Applicable on the NOTF Operability Task. If the basis for this determination in not readily apparent (e.g., the effected component does not have a discrete SAP Functional Location and several engineering documents were used to make the determination), include a brief description for the basis in the documentation.
GO TO OP-AA-101-112-1002 to perform a Risk Assessment.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 8 of 75 5.1.3. IF the SSC addressed in the NOTF MEETS any of the SSC Classifications in Step 5.1.1, THEN PERFORM an SSC operability screening. This screening should determine the impact of the condition documented in the NOTF on the capability of the SSC to perform its safety function(s), and, whether the SSC conforms to all aspects of its design and licensing basis. In making this determination, the screener should:
DETERMINE the specific SSC that is affected by the condition.
DETERMINE the specific safety function(s) performed by the SSC and the effect of the condition on performance of the safety function(s).
- IF the notification documents a condition where an SSC is inoperable, and has been for a period of time exceeding the associated T/S allowed outage time, document the need to evaluate LER reportability in the notification DETERMINE if specific requirements or license commitments exist for the SSC and whether the requirement or commitment is still being met.
Base the determination on the best information available.
IDENTIFY the method used for making the determination including analysis, test, or partial test, operating experience, engineering judgment, or, any combination as appropriate.
When using engineering judgment to determine that the SSC is fully operable, ENSURE that there is a very high level of confidence in the determination. For example, if a leak occurs in a system that has a design allowable leakage, and a specific leak rate can be determined by measurement to be within the allowable leak rate, the system would be considered Operable.
ASSIGN a new NU-LCO task code for unplanned LCO's. INDICATE if the LCO is greater than or less than 72 hrs or whether the LCO was discovered when the equipment was already out of service for planned maintenance. STATUS the task complete.
CONSIDER the effect of the condition on BOTH, similar SSCs on the same Unit, and, like SSCs on the opposite Unit.
INCLUDE a review of other existing conditions for aggregate impact.
REFER TO Attachment 1, and, either Exhibit 2, T/S Implementation And Allowable Outage Times (LAOTs), as applicable, for additional guidance through case studies and established operability precedence for previously identified items that may be applicable, for a list of components that impact High Energy Line Break criteria.
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 9 of 75 5.1.3 (continued)
- IF at any point in the review, a reasonable expectation of operability does not exist, or mounting evidence suggests that the final analysis will conclude that the SSC cannot perform its specified safety function(s), DO NOT delay declaring the SSC inoperable.
The SSC is considered operable if it is capable of performing its safety function(s),
and, conforms to all aspects of the current licensing basis, including regulations, codes and standards, design criteria, and commitments.
5.2 Review of Planned Removal of SSCs from Service for Impact on Operability and Risk [CD-316D, CD-026F, CD-381X]
5.2.1.
REFER TO Exhibit 1, Review of Planned Removal of SSCs from Service.
5.2.2.
DETERMINE if the SSC to be removed from service is a planned activity included in the current Work Week Implementation Schedule. Planned activities include but are not limited to surveillance, in-service, and functional testing, corrective and preventive maintenance, implementation of Evolution or Troubleshooting Plans developed per MA-AA-716-004, and implementing Work Clearance per OP-AA-109-115. This review is typically performed during review of Planned/Task Ready Orders and Authorization of WCDs.
5.2.3. IF activity is NOT included in the current Work Week Schedule, authorization to remove the SSC from service or perform the activity should not be granted until further review and actions per WC-AA-101 are performed. Refer to WC-AA-101 for further action.
5.2.4. IF the activity IS included in the current Work Week Schedule, DETERMINE if the SSC impacted meets one of the following SSC Classifications:
[CD-214A, CD-375B, CD-056X, CD-360X]
SSC is related to Technical Specifications/LAOT SSC is Safety Related SSC is Important to Safety/Q-listed/Current Licensing Basis REFER to Section WC-AA-101 for further definitions.
ENSURE a thorough review of Technical specifications, UFSAR, SAP Component Classifications Data, and other engineering and licensing documentation in making this determination.
5.2.5. IF the SSC does NOT meet the SSC Classifications in Step 5.2.4, THEN GO TO Step 5.2.9 to perform a Risk Assessment.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 10 of 75 NOTE: A determination of OPERABLE but degraded or non-conforming is not considered applicable for planned activities. In the event that the following review results in this determination, the SSC should not be removed from service until further review and actions per WC-AA-104 are performed 5.2.6. IF the SSC MEETS the SSC Classifications in Step 5.2.4, THEN DETERMINE whether the performance of the planned activity will render the SSC INOPERABLE during performance. Schedule logics, detailed fragnets, procedures, and, evolution or troubleshooting plans, that will be used for performance of the activity, and, boundaries defined by WCDs, and either Exhibit 2, T/S Implementation And Allowable Outage Times (LAOTs), as applicable, should be used in making this determination.
5.2.7. IF the SSC will remain OPERABLE during performance of the planned activity, no further action is required prior performing the planned activity.
5.2.8. IF the SSC will be rendered INOPERABLE during performance of the planned activity, PERFORM the following:
- 1.
For those SSCs that will be rendered INOPERABLE that are T/S related, in parallel with completion of Section 5.2, PROCEED to Section 5.3 AND ENTER the appropriate T/S LCO AND ENSURE the required T/S actions are implemented. [CD-421Y]
- 2.
For Fire Protection Systems required by licensing conditions that are rendered INOPERABLE, NOTIFY the Fire Department AND ENSURE actions of HC.FP-AP.ZZ-0004(Q) are implemented
- 3.
For those SSCs that are rendered INOPERABLE that are not expressly identified in Technical Specifications, ASSESS the condition for reasonable assurance of safety IAW Attachment 4 AND ENSURE compensatory measures to minimize the impact of the condition and ensure the plant is maintained in a safe condition are implemented.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 11 of 75 5.2.9.
PERFORM an assessment of the impact of the planned activity on the Current Risk Assessment Evaluation as follows:
- 1.
DETERMINE if the planned activity impacts an SSC that is In Scope for A(4) Risk Assessment utilizing OP-AA-101-112-1002. IF unsure, CONTACT the duty A(4) PRA Analyst for assistance.
- 2. IF the SSC is in scope for A(4) risk assessment, VALIDATE that plant conditions are consistent with the Risk Assessment Evaluation prepared in support of the work week schedule. IF plant conditions differ due to emergent or unplanned activities, VERIFY that an updated Risk Assessment was performed to support continued planned activities prior to authorizing performance of the planned activity.
(REFER TO Section 5.1 for review of unplanned CAQs)
- 3. IF the planned activity renders the in scope SSC "Unavailable" as defined by OP-AA-101-112-1002 (REFER TO the definition of "Unavailability -
Maintenance Rule A(4) Risk Assessment"), ENSURE a Risk Assessment is completed IAW OP-AA-101-112-1002 AND DOCUMENT the results in the Control Room Log(s).
- 4.
ENSURE Maintenance Rule A(4) Compensatory Measures are implemented per the A(4) Risk Assessment.
- 5. IF the SSC is not modeled in EOOS and is not necessary for the performance of a Risk Significant function in the SYSFUNC, then the SSC is not in scope and a Risk Assessment is not required.
5.3 Entry into Active/Tracking Technical Specification (T/S) LCO/LAOT Action Statements NOTE: If the equipment is part of a system listed in OP-AA-108-101-1002 or the SM/CRS (Command and Control SRO) requires it for this piece of equipment, a second verification that the equipment is properly removed from service is required. [CD-695A, CD-375B, CD-387B, CD-316D, CD-458D, CD-583D, CD-037F, CD-117Y, CD-424Y]
5.3.1.
Any time it is determined that a TECH SPECS/LAOT SSC is or will be INOPERABLE either due to a Condition Adverse to Quality identified via the NOTF process (Section 5.1), a planned activity (Section 5.2), or following a Plant Transient, the appropriate T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is entered.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 12 of 75 NOTE: The LCO Tracking Log may also be utilized to track deficiencies to Tech Spec and Important to Safety equipment at the discretion of the CRS or SM.
[70035985]
5.3.2.
DETERMINE if the T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is ACTIVE or TRACKING based on the following criteria:
ACTIVE: An Active T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is entered for those conditions where the SSC is INOPERABLE and the SSC design function is specifically required to be OPERABLE in the current Operational Condition by Technical Specifications/LAOTs. An example of an Active T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is a failure of an Emergency Diesel Generator to satisfy its surveillance requirements in Operational Condition 1.
TRACKING: A Tracking T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is entered whenever any of the following conditions exists:
The SSC is INOPERABLE, but is not required by Technical Specifications/LAOTs to be OPERABLE in the current Operational Condition. An example of this type of Tracking T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is a failure of an Emergency Diesel Generator to satisfy surveillance requirements in Operational Condition 5. This includes refuel outage LCOs not required for the current operational condition.
OR The SSC is INOPERABLE, but there is 100% redundant equipment that satisfies the Operability requirements of Technical Specifications/LOATs for the current Operational Condition. An example of this type of Tracking T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is the inoperability of one 1E 125 VDC battery charger in Operational Condition 1, provided the other battery charger is OPERABLE (100% redundant).
[CD-026F]
OR The Inservice Testing (IST) valve, after exceeding its acceptance criteria following the second retest, shall have the condition analyzed within 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> of occurrence. This analysis period will be used to determine if the stroke time data represents acceptable valve operation, OR if the valve should be declared inoperable and the appropriate T/S action statement(s) taken. The requirement for analysis shall be documented in a Notification and noted in the Plan-of-the-Day.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 13 of 75 5.3.3. IF the cause of the SSC being INOPERABLE is a planned Operations, Maintenance, Radiation Protection, or Chemistry Evolution that satisfies the following criteria:
[CD-524G CD-538G CD-421Y]
The equipment is NOT tagged out of service except where use of Workers Blocking Tags have been approved IAW OP-AA-109-115 (e.g., use of WBTs to perform NPV & SPV weekly samples).
The INOPERABLE condition is expected to last a relatively short time (closing a manual isolation valve to allow for a valve to be stroked tested, throttling manual valves to achieve required flow during pump testing, barring an EDG, performing a routine T/S instrument channel calibration or functional test, performing a required EQ relay replacement in conjunction with a scheduled channel calibration or functional test, initiating SLC sparging air for chemistry sample, removing NPV RMS from service for weekly samples, etc.).
Restoration to OPERABLE upon completion of the evolution is likely to be successful.
COMPLETE Attachment 5 of HC.OP-DL.ZZ-0026(Q), to track allowable outage times before actions (either by Operations or other departments) are required.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 14 of 75 5.3.4.
For activities that cause a TECH SPECS/LAOT SSC to be INOPERABLE that do not meet the criteria of Section 5.3.3, DOCUMENT the condition as follows:
NOTE: TS LCO/LAOT Action Statement Tracking may be accomplished using either the computerized SAP LCO Tracking System or Attachment 3-1 and Form 1. During Refueling Outages, use of the computerized SAP LCO Tracking System is preferred due to the high volume of activities associated with any given Action Statement except for tracking Inoperable Secondary Containment penetrations during Fuel Handling and CORE ALTERATIONS when Secondary Containment Integrity is not required. Under these conditions, Attachment 3-1 and Form 1 should be utilized to assure Control Room personnel are fully cognizant of active Contingency Plans (Attachment 5) to seal Secondary Containment penetrations within 30 minutes in the event of a Fuel Handling Accident. During normal operation, use of the computerized SAP LCO Tracking System or Attachments 6 and Form 1 is at the discretion of the operating shifts.
When an INOPERABLE TECH SPECS/LAOT SSC affects multiple LCO Action Statements, only one T/S Action Statement Log entry is required.
- 1.
For SAP LCO tracking, REFER TO guidance provided in OP-AA-108-115-1001, SAP LCO Entry.
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 15 of 75 NOTE: Preparation of Form 1 is not limited to the SM/CRS. Form 1 may be prepared by appropriate personnel in advance to support planned activities, or, after the fact during plant transients. During normal operations, the SM/CRS remains responsible for the accuracy of the information provided and authorizing entry into T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statements. During Refueling Outages, the SM/CRS may delegate authorization of entry into planned T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statements entered into the computerized SAP LCO Tracking System to an actively licensed and proficient SRO for efficiency. However, the SM/CRS should remain cognizant of the status of such T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statements.
- 2.
For LCO tracking using Attachment 3-1 and Form 1, PEFORM the following:
A. ASSIGN the next consecutive LCO Index Number obtained from the Action Statement Log Index (Attachment 3-1) and LOG the T/S LCO/LAOT ACTION Statement on the Index.
B. COMPLETE Sections 1 and 2 of Form 1 by performing the following:
RECORD the LCO Index Number (from Attachment 3-1)
RECORD the LCO Status (Active / Tracking)
RECORD the applicable Technical Specification/LAOT LCO number.
When an INOPERABLE TECH SPECS/LAOT SSC affects multiple LCO Action Statements, RECORD the LCO number with the most limiting Action Time.
RECORD the Date/Time Entered.
RECORD the Operational Condition Applicability for the LCO.
RECORD the Date/Time Action Required. When recording the date and time that Action is required for an LCO Action Statement that has multiple actions, use the most limiting Action time. For Tracking Action Statements, record N/A.
RECORD Other Applicable T/S. List only active LCOs. Applicable tracking LCOs should be listed separately in the Summary Description of the Log Sheet.
RECORD the Equipment description.
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 16 of 75 5.3.4.2.B (continued)
- Briefly STATE the reason for the SSC condition in the Summary Description section and include a brief summary of actions required, including submittal of any special reports to the NRC. NOTIFY the Shift Operations Superintendent of any reporting requirements.
INITIATE Responsible Department Notifications for required compensatory actions and DOCUMENT Name of Department and Person Notified with the Notification Date/Time, as well as Name of Person Making Notification. (Include NOTIF # if applicable)
The individual being notified will come to the Control Room and sign the NOTIF# box next to their name to indicate that they have received the information and they fully understand the action they have been directed to take. In the TSAS Description Addendum section they will list the procedure they will use to take the action to comply with the license.
For recurring samples, analysis, hook-up of sample equipment, etc.,
the departmental individual performing this action will report to the Control Room and document in the description addendum of the TSAS each time an action is taken. This will be audited at a frequency determined by Licensed Operations Supervision.
When actions are no longer required or an instrument is to be restored to the pre-LCO condition (example: OGPTRMS correction factor) the action taken will be documented and signed for by the departmental individual performing the action in the description addendum section of the TSAS.
ENSURE all applicable Non-Conforming Component/Material (NCCM)
Evaluations, Notifications/Orders, Work Clearance Documents (WCD) etc., are entered on the Order and WCD Addendum. INCLUDE any surveillances required to restore the equipment to operability as part of the Addendum. Surveillance tests should be reviewed to determine if the appropriate prerequisites would exist for the equipment scheduled restoration.
RECORD Redundant Equipment Operable (Y/N).
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 17 of 75 5.3.4.2 (continued)
C. IF the INOPERABLE SSC will impact Secondary Containment Integrity per T/S 3.6.5.1 - during Fuel Handling and CORE ALTERATIONS when Secondary Containment Integrity and FRVS actuation is not required, THEN COMPLETE Attachment 5, Contingency Plan for Sealing Secondary Containment Penetrations During Fuel Handling and CORE ALTERATIONS for EACH inoperable penetration. Attachment 5, Section 1 and 2 may be completed in advance as part of refueling outage preparations.
ATTACH the completed Attachment 5 to Form 1 for tracking Secondary Containment Integrity per Technical Specification 3.6.5.1.
(The individual listed in Section 3 of Attachment 5, is required to ensure penetration can be closed within 30 minutes in the event of a Fuel Handling Accident.)
(The individual listed in Section 3 of Attachment 5, is also required to ensure the CRS is provided with the name of a relief and a method of contact prior to rescinding responsibility and leaving site.)
NOTE: For a planned entry into an action statement, SRO/STA concurrence is required, but the signature on the Action Statement Log Sheet is not required prior to entering the action statement.
For an unplanned entry into an action statement, SRO/STA concurrence should be obtained as soon as practical after entering the action statement.
If the person who completed Sections 1 and 2 of Form 1 (Step 5.3.4.2.B) was not an actively licensed and proficient SRO, or a qualified and proficient STA, then the following step requires concurrence review from an actively licensed and proficient SRO, and/or a qualified and proficient STA. The actively licensed and proficient SRO, and/or the qualified and proficient STA completing the concurrence review shall not be the same person who authorizes entry into the TECH SPECS/LAOT Action Statement in 5.3.4.B.5.
D. OBTAIN CONCURRENCE REVIEW from an actively licensed and proficient SRO and/or a qualified and proficient STA of plant conditions, T/S, existing active and tracking action statements, and, the T/S Action Statement Log, to ensure the equipment can be, or, is properly removed from service (for unplanned entry into a T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement) and, that redundant equipment is operable. For planned entry into a T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement, this review should be performed within a reasonable time prior to removal of the equipment from service to ensure plant conditions are reflective of conditions when the SSC will be removed form service. [CD-079A]
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 18 of 75 5.3.4.2 (continued)
E. OBTAIN SM/CRS AUTHORIZATION for entry into the TECH SPECS/LAOT Action Statement. The SM/CRS should review plant conditions, T/S, existing active and tracking action statements, and the T/S Action Statement Log to ensure the equipment can be, or is properly removed from service (for unplanned entry into a TS LCO/LAOT Action Statement) and that redundant equipment is operable. [CD-079A]
NOTE: The bypassed/out-of-service indications are those indicating lights and/or overhead alarms in the main control room only, and does not extend to CRIDS or SPDS.
F. WHEN equipment becomes unavailable, ENSURE bypassed/out-of-service indication in the Control Room activates/is activated to remind the operator of system, subsystem, or train status.
IF no bypassed/out-of-service indication is active to indicate system, subsystem or train status, THEN, ACTIVATE the associated manual bypass pushbutton to induce the bypassed/out-of-service indication.
[CD-390X, CD-621X, CD-967X]
G. ENSURE all Required Actions (either by Operations or other departments) are implemented within the Allowable Time. DIRECT or REFERENCE z of HC.OP-DL.ZZ-0026(Q).
H. IMPLEMENT the Description Addendum (Form 1, Section 3.0) as a narrative log to capture all information relevant to the TECH SPECS/LAOT Action Statement.
I. IF an LCO status is to be changed (Active/Tracking)
THEN DOCUMENT this in the Description Addendum.
This change requires two initials -
SM/CRS AND One actively licensed and proficient SRO, or a qualified and proficient STA.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 19 of 75 5.3.5.
Entry into an Operational Mode or Condition, or other specified condition, is permitted when following LAOTs for equipment that is outside of plant T/Ss provided the following conditions are met:
- 1.
If the LAOT provides for indefinite operation then there is no mode change restriction (similar to 3.0.4.a).
- 2.
If the LAOT would require a plant shutdown (i.e. an inoperable TSC Chiller),
then utilize the Tech Spec 3.0.4.b guidance IAW Exhibit 8.
- 3.
For systems which inoperability would directly result in the inoperability of one of the Tech Spec 3.0.4.b exempted systems (i.e. both HPCI room coolers being inoperable leading to declaring HPCI inoperable), mode change is not permitted."
5.3.6.
Snubbers are designed to provide seismic, non-seismic (hydrodynamic, turbine trip, etc.), or a combination of seismic and non-seismic functions. Snubber operability requirements are provided in TRM 3.7.5 and actions for inoperable snubbers are determined based upon the affected system(s) LCO. Tech Spec LCO 3.0.8 provides an allowance to delay declaring an affected system inoperable when the seismic function of a snubber is nonfunctional. If the design function of a snubber includes non-seismic loads, LCO 3.0.8 cannot be applied. LCO 3.0.8 is an allowance, not a requirement, and as such when the seismic function of a snubber is nonfunctional the LCO for the affected may be entered instead of using LCO 3.0.8 if the requirements of LCO 3.0.8 cannot be met or are in question. Engineering procedure SH.RA-ST.ZZ-0105(Q) SNUBBER EXAMINATION AND TESTING, provides a matrix of all Hope Creek snubbers, their function, the impacted systems, and guidance on the applicability of LCO 3.0.8. This procedure may be used to assist in operability assessment and use of the LCO 3.0.8 allowances. Engineering should be contacted for additional assistance if required to determine the impact of a nonfunctional snubber. Tech Spec Bases provides additional details on the applicability requirements of LCO 3.0.8. Documentation of the plant status for meeting the conditions required for taking the allowance in LCO 3.0.8 should be provided on the applicable Technical Specification Action Statement Log. This documentation should include at a minimum the following:
The design function of the snubber (i.e. seismic, non-seismic, combination).
System(s) or Subsystem(s) impacted.
Implementation of any plant restrictions (mode requirements, minimum system in service requirements).
Plant Configuration (i.e. no other ECCS systems out of service).
Current Plant Risk assessment.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 20 of 75 5.4 Exit from Active/Tracking Technical Specification LCO Action Statements/LAOTs NOTE: The following step applies to the implementation of T/S 3.0.5 and the administrative controls required to support its implementation. T/S 3.0.5, should only be implemented when testing is required to demonstrate OPERABILITY of an SSC. Troubleshooting and maintenance activities shall not be performed when T/S 3.0.5 is implemented.
5.4.1. WHEN implementing T/S 3.0.5, ENSURE the reason for implementation is clearly logged in the Control Room Narrative log.
NOTE: The following steps provide the specific requirements that must be satisfied to administratively reopen Primary Containment Isolation Valves that were closed to satisfy the requirements of Technical Specification 3.6.3. This guidance constitutes the administrative control required by the Tech Spec and should only be implemented for this specific purpose.
5.4.2.
The Primary Containment Isolation Valves that were closed to satisfy the requirements of T/S 3.6.3 may be intermittently re-opened under administrative controls PROVIDED, the following requirements are implemented to provide consistent application and control of this condition:
For Primary Containment penetrations with one inboard and outboard isolation valve, where both valves are INOPERABLE, the appropriate administrative control is to release one valve at a time and perform an operability retest prior to releasing the other isolation valve.
The release of INOPERABLE Primary Containment Isolation valves under administrative control must be clearly noted in the Control Room Narrative Log.
- IF an isolation valve is opened which cannot be re-closed from the Control Room, then a dedicated individual, in continuous communication with the Control Room is stationed to rapidly isolate the valve if needed.
The duration that a valve is opened under administrative control should be minimized.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 21 of 75 NOTE: Performing the initial review that conditions will support exit from a T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement is not limited to the SM/CRS. During normal operations, the SM/CRS remains responsible for the accuracy of the information provided and Authorizing exit from T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statements. During Refueling Outages, the SM/CRS may delegate Authorization of entry into planned T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statements entered into the computerized SAP LCO Tracking System to an actively licensed and proficient SRO for efficiency. However, the SM/CRS should remain cognizant of the status of such T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statements.
5.4.3.
To exit a T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement tracked using the computerized SAP LCO Tracking System; REFER TO guidance provided in OP-AA-108-115-1001.
5.4.4.
To exit a T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement using Attachments 6 and Form 1, PERFORM the following:
NOTE: If the equipment is part of a system listed in OP-AA-108-101-1002, or the SM/CRS (Command and Control SRO) requires it for this piece of equipment, a second verification that the equipment is properly restored to service is required. [CD-601A CD-695A, CD-373B, CD-375B, CD-387B, CD-316D, CD-458D, CD-583D, CD-927E, CD-037F, CD-117Y, CD-424Y]
- 1.
REVIEW all applicable Non-Conforming Component/Material (NCCM)
Evaluations, Notifications, Orders, WCDs, etc., that are entered on the Order and WCD Addendum to verify that all activities affecting OPERABILITY of the SSC are complete. This includes, but is not limited to the following:
[CD-316D, CD-079A, CD-373B, CD-390X, CD-621X]
Maintenance activities are completed and associated NOTFs and Orders are appropriately statused in SAP.
Blocking tags have been released and associated WCDs are closed in SAP.
An appropriate system line-up and fill and vent have been performed.
[CD-525B, CD-206A, CD-695A, CD-358D, CD-895E, CD-601A]
Retests have been performed satisfactorily, reviewed by appropriate personnel (such as in the case of performance of an in-service test on a pump that requires re-base lining), and updated in SAP.
Energizing equipment that had been removed form service by racking out a rack-out type breaker.
- 2.
INITIATE required departmental notifications for cancellation of compensatory actions and document person contacted with time and date. [CD-624E]
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 22 of 75 5.4.4 (continued)
NOTE: The SRO/STA in Step 5.4.4.3 and the SM/CRS in Step 5.4.4.4 shall not be the same person.
- 3.
OBTAIN REVIEW and CONCURRENCE from an actively licensed and proficient SRO or a qualified and proficient STA of the T/S Action Statement Log for completeness, to ensure that re-testing and lineup verifications have been completed as necessary, and, that the SSC is in a condition to be declared OPERABLE.
[CD-079A]
- 4.
OBTAIN SM/CRS AUTHORIZATION for exit from the T/S LCO/LAOT Action Statement. In granting this authorization, the SM/CRS should review the T/S Action Statement Log for completeness, ensure that re-testing and lineup verifications have been completed as necessary, and, that the SSC is in a condition to be declared OPERABLE. [CD-079A]
- 5.
UPDATE the Action Statement Log Index with the time that authorization for exit was granted.
- 6.
As equipment is returned to service, IF the bypassed/out-of-service indication in the Control Room activated/was activated to remind the operator of system, subsystem, or train status when the equipment was removed from service, THEN ENSURE the bypassed/out-of-service indication is OFF. IF provided, ENSURE the system level bypassed and inoperable status indication (manual out-of-service switches and indicators, power failure lights, etc.) has been de-activated either automatically or by pushbutton.
[CD-390X, CD-621X, CD-967X]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 23 of 75 5.5 Periodic Audits [CD-536G]
5.5.1.
PERFORM a periodic review of the Action Statement Log Index and the individual log sheets. This review will normally be performed on a weekly basis by a WCCS/STA in Work Control, and ensures that:
Active/Tracking LCOs are correct for existing plant conditions All required documentation and signatures are complete The Action Statement Log Index is consistent with the individual log sheets, including a review of Non-Conforming Component/Material (NCCM) Evaluations, Notifications/Orders, WCDs for the associated LCO.
The WCCS/STA should CONFIRM that the review is complete by dating and signing -1 under the last entry. The review should consist of a check between the index and the individual log sheets, including a review of Non-Conforming Component/Material (NCCM) Evaluations, Notifications/ Orders, WCDs for proper status and validity.
5.5.2.
PERFORM a periodic review of open OpEval. This review will normally be performed on a monthly basis by an AOM or his designee. The review should ensure that:
Compensatory actions are being performed for OpEval which are required in the current Operational Condition.
Corrective actions are being performed in a timely manner.
All required signatures have been obtained.
5.5.3.
PERFORM a review to ensure that proper justification exists to allow for all open OpEval s to extend past the refuel outage. [GL 91-18] This review will normally be performed on a monthly basis by an AOM or his designee.
5.5.4.
FORWARD Completed Action Statement Log Sheets and OpEval to the operations staff for retention/archiving.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 24 of 75
- 6.
RECORDS 6.1 All records should be maintained in SAP as described in the body of the procedure.
When SAP in not available, and attachments are used, then process the attachments with control room records.
- 7.
REFERENCES 7.1 LS-AA-120, Notification Process 7.2 WC-AA-101, Work Management process 7.3 LS-AA-125, Performance Improvement Process 7.4 WC-AA-111, Predefine Process 7.5 AD-AA-101, Nuclear Procedure Program 7.6 OP-AA-109-115, Safety Tagging Operations 7.7 HC.FP-AP.ZZ-0004(Q), Actions for Inoperable Fire Protection - Hope Creek Station 7.8 OP-AA-108-115-1001 LCO Entry/Exit & Operability Determination SAP Guidance 7.9 ANS - 3.2/ANSI N18.7-1976 Administrative Controls and Quality Assurance for the Operational Phase of Nuclear Power Plants [CD-147Y CD-145Y CD-372Y 7.10 NRC Inspection Manual, Part 9900 Technical Guidance Operable/Operability:
Ensuring the Functional Capability of a System or Component Resolution of Degraded and Non-conforming Condition 7.11 NRC Generic Letter 91-18, dated November 7, 1991, Information to Licensees Regarding two NRC Inspection Manual Sections on Resolution of Degraded and Non-conforming Conditions and on Operability.
7.12 NUREG 0737, Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements,Section I.A.1.2, I.C.2, I.C.3, and I.C.6.
7.13 PSE & G letter from R.L. Mittle, General Manager - Nuclear Assurance and Regulation, to Mr. Albert Schwenser, Chief Licensing Branch 2, Division of Licensing, Sept. 13, 1984, and its Attachments 7.14 Hope Creek Generating Station Technical Specifications 7.15 Hope Creek Generating Station SER 7.16 Hope Creek Generating Station UFSAR 7.17 Hope Creek Generating Station Event Classification Guide 7.18 ANSI/ANS - 58.9-1981 (Single Failure Criteria for Light Water Reactor Safety-Related Fluid Systems) 7.19 S-C-ZZ-MER-0013, Protection Against Steam Flooding 7.20 H-1-BCXX-MSE-0687, NRC INFO 87-10: Potential for Water Hammer during restart of RHR Pumps following a Loss of Offsite Power
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 25 of 75 7.21 Closing Documents CD-079A NRC BULL 79-08 CD-206A NRC IE Information Notice No. 79-26 CD-214A NRC I.E. Information Notice No. 79-35 CD-495A INPO SER 09-82 CD-601A INPO O&MR 022 CD-695A INPO SOER 82-04 CD-185B INPO SOER 83-05 CD-373B NRC I.E. Information Notice No. 84-37 CD-375B NRC I.E. Information Notice No. 84-39 CD-387B NRC I.E. Information Notice No. 84-51 CD-504B NRC I.E. Information Notice No. 83-56 CD-525B NRC I.E. Information Notice No. 83-77 CD-316D NRC Information Notice No. 84-58 CD-358D INPO SER 56-84 CD-458D INPO Good Practices GP-84.14 OP.3-4 CD-583D INPO SER 80-84 CD-861D NRC GL-04-10-08 CD-605E NHO INCI 354/86-130 CD-624E NHO INCI 354/86-165 CD-895E INPO SER 04-87 CD-900E INPO SER 07-87 CD-927E NRC INFO 87-25 CD-026F NHO INCI 354/87-110 CD-037F NRC INFO 87-38 CD-524G NHO INCI 354/93-105 CD-536G NRC OPEN 354/86-52 CD-537G NRC OPEN 354/86-30-02 CD-538G NRC OPEN 354/92-80-14 CD-834G NHO INCI 354/94-240 CD-056X NHO HSAR F05-0055-00 (FSAR 5.4.6.1.2.1)
CD-360X NHO HSAR F07-0116-00 (FSAR 7.3.2.1.1)
CD-381X NHO HSAR F07-0141-00 (FSAR 7.4.2.2.3)
CD-390X NHO HSAR F07-0153-00 (FSAR 7.5.1.3.2)
CD-621X NHO HSAR F01-0023-00 (FSAR 1.8.1.22 Reg. Guide 1.22 Rev. 0)
CD-967X NHO HSAR Q421.2 (NRC Question 421.2)
CD-117Y NHO HSAR F13-0007-00 (UFSAR 13.1.2.2.3)
CD-145Y NHO SRP S13-0031-00 (SRP 13.5.1.II.A.1-7 Administrative Procedures)
CD-147Y NHO HSAR S13-0031-00 (SRP 13.5.1.II.A.1-7 Administrative Procedures)
CD-372Y NHO HSAR F01-024A-04 (FSAR 1.8.1.33)
CD-421Y NHO HSAR F01-050H-08 (UFSAR 1.10.2.I.C.2)
CD-424Y NHO HSAR F01-050K-08 (FSAR 1.10.2.I.C.6)
CD-428Y NHO HSAR F01-050Z-08 (FSAR 1.10.2.II.K.1.10)
(continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 26 of 75 7.21 (continued)
NRC Letter/SER, D.V. Pickett to G. G. Campbell,.Application of Generic Letter 80-30 Guidance to an Inoperable Non-Technical Specification Support Subsystem, dated 4/5/02.
CD-450A, INPO SER 067-81 7.22 Cross References LS-AA-120 Notification Process
- OP-AA-108-101 Control of Equipment Status
- OP-AA-108-101-1001, Component Configuration Control CC-AA-103 Configuration Change Control LS-AA-104 - 10CFR50.59 Reviews and Safety Evaluations
- HC.OP-AP.ZZ-0109(Q),
Equipment Operational Control
- HC.ER-DG
.ZZ-0002(Z), Maintenance Rule System Functional Failure & Risk Significance Guide LS-AA-125 Corrective Action Process Reference PSEG actions in response to NRC concerns regarding B Reactor Recirculation Pump, Hope Creek Generating Station, Docket No. 50-354 and LR-N05-0017, January 9, 2005 7.23 Corrective Actions PR 980623173 - UHS Amendment 120 PR 990519182 - SLCS Status During Air Sparging PR 990112196 - Vacuum Breaker DCP 4HE-0390 70033716 - CVCS Pipe Supports Not IAW UFSAR 70035985 - Use of the LCO Tracking Log to track deficiencies to Tech Spec and Important to Safety, equipment at the discretion of the CRS or SM.
70036482 - evaluating length of inoperability for reportability 70069669 - T/S 3/4.1.4 Basis Change 7.24 NUREGs
- NUREG-0696, Sections 2.6, 2.7 and 2.8 NUREG-0800, Section 6.4
- NUREG-0654, Part II, Section H.1, E and F NUREG-0737, Supplement 1, Section 8, Action Item III.A.1.2 7.25 Code of Federal Regulations
- 10CFR50.47(b) 10CFR50.47(b)(8) and (d)(4) 10CFR50, Appendix E, Section IV.E.9 10CFR50.47(b)(6) and (d)(2), (3) 10CFR50, Appendix E, Section IV.E.8 (Last Page of Procedure)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 27 of 75 ATTACHMENT 1 CASE STUDIES IN OPERABILITY (Page 1 of 3)
- 1.
The following are case studies of selected topics concerning assessment of operability:
1.1 Missing or Deficient Documentation Missing or deficient documentation that could affect SSC Operability should be considered a loss of Full Qualification. An Operability Determination should be performed to cover the period of time until missing documentation is replaced or the documentation deficiency is resolved.
Qualification Documentation Errors IF a review indicates an error or omission exists in the qualification documentation, an Operability Determination should be performed. It should be determined whether this situation questions the actual ability of equipment to perform its design function.
1.2 Environmental Qualification IF a potential deficiency has been identified in the Environmental Qualification (EQ) of equipment, an Operability Determination should be performed. The SSC may be demonstrated operable using analysis or partial test data. In addition subsequent failure of the SSC, if likely under accident conditions, will not result in significant degradation of any Specified Safety Function or provide misleading information to the operator.
EQ installation and maintenance requirements are defined in the Qualification Information and Documentation files (QID). If it is apparent after evaluation the SSC would not perform its Specified Safety Function(s) under all postulated service conditions, the SSC should be declared inoperable.
For SSCs covered by the Technical Specifications, the appropriate action statement must be followed. For inoperable equipment that is not covered by the Technical Specifications, operation may continue if:
1.2.1.
Specified Safety Function can be accomplished by another qualified SSC OR 1.2.2.
Limited administrative controls ensure the Specified Safety Function is performed.
Additional guidance regarding environmental qualification is discussed in Generic Letter 88-07, Modified Enforcement Policy Relating to 10CFR50.49, Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 28 of 75 ATTACHMENT 1 CASE STUDIES IN OPERABILITY (Page 2 of 3) 1.3 Fire Protection Fire protection equipment is considered operable when it is capable of performing its Specified Safety Function. This capability is satisfied when:
1.3.1.
It satisfies the applicable operability requirements of UFSAR (Section 9.5).
1.3.2.
It has been tested periodically IAW requirements of the Fire Protection Program.
1.3.3.
Its required auxiliaries are capable of performing their intended function.
The FSAR defines the compensatory measures to be taken if fire protection equipment is found to not be operable.
(Refer to SC.FP-AP.ZZ-0003(Q) or HC.FP-AP.ZZ-0004(Q))
1.4 Structural Requirements Category I structures and supports subject to periodic surveillance and inspection should be considered operable if the limits stipulated in the Technical Specification are met. If these limits are not met, the LCOs are to be entered for the affected structure.
Degradations identified in Category I structures which are not subject to periodic surveillance and inspection, should be assessed to determine the capability of these structures to perform their specified function.
Significant degradation exceeding acceptance limits must be promptly reported IAW the requirements in 10CFR50.72 and evaluated for operability.
Any system which depends upon the degraded structure for required support should also be examined for operability if the degradation or nonconformance calls into question the performance of the system.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 29 of 75 ATTACHMENT 1 CASE STUDIES IN OPERABILITY (Page 3 of 3) 1.5 Conditions Adverse to Quality that Involve Non-Conforming Component/Material (NCCM) Evaluations (Reference NC.CA-TM.ZZ-0001(Z),
Nonconforming Component/Material Evaluation Template)
For those CAQs that involve NCCM Evaluations expected to result in a Use-as-is or accept (i.e. conforming) disposition, the SSC Operability status should be OPERABLE. The SSC Operability Screening should include the basis for the OPERABILITY, including the expectation that the NCCM disposition will be Use-as-is, or accept with reasonable assurance from the responsible Engineer. For this condition, a OPEVAL and CRFA may still be required. The responsible Engineer should be notified to contact the on-duty SM/CRS if the NCCM disposition is subsequently determined to be other than Use-as-is or accept. The timeliness of the NCCM completion is controlled by LS-AA-125, Corrective Action Program (CAP)
Procedure.
NCCM and OPEVAL/CRFA Evaluations may overlap, but are unique in purpose.
NCCMs address conformity and control of material to the requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion XV, and may not fully address non-conformance as defined in GL 91-18.
1.6 Missed Technical Specification Surveillances REFER TO Exhibit 7 - Actions for Missed Surveillance Activities.
1.7 Steam Leaks For rooms that contain safety related equipment (i.e., HPCI room) consider steam leaks when making an operability determination (e.g., impact on ability to deliver required design flows and potential environmental qualification issues caused by the leak including the HVAC systems). Attempt to quantify the size of the leak and CONTACT Design Engineering for assistance in determining operability. [70040333]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 30 of 75 ATTACHMENT 2 INOPERABILITY OF SSCs THAT ARE SAFETY-RELATED, OR IMPORTANT TO SAFETY (Page 1 of 1)
Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs) that are not expressly subject to Technical Specifications, but are Safety-Related or Important to Safety and that are determined to be inoperable or render a portion of the SSC inoperable, should be assessed for reasonable assurance of safety by the SM/CRS. (Note: Some SSCs have Licensee Allowable Outage Time requirements - REFER TO Exhibit 2). This assessment should include the following:
Availability and material condition of redundant or backup equipment (e.g., the accumulated affect of degraded equipment).
Compensatory measures including limited administrative controls Safety function and events protected against Conservatism and margins Probability of needing the safety function ECG requirements IF the assessment determines there is reasonable assurance of safety, then operation may continue while prompt corrective action is taken.
IF the assessment determines that reasonable assurance of safety cannot be ensured, then implementation of compensatory measures are required to minimize the impact of the condition and to ensure the plant is maintained in a safe condition.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 31 of 75 ATTACHMENT 3-1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT LOG INDEX (Page 1 of 1)
LCO INDEX NUMBER TECH SPEC NUMBER ACTIVE/
TRACKING
SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION PLANNED Y/N ENTRY DATE/
TIME EXPIRATION DATE/TIME/
CONDITION EXIT DATE/
TIME
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 32 of 75 ATTACHMENT 3-2 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT LOG INDEX (ELECTRONIC VERSION)
(Page 1 of 1)
(1)
Unit (2)
Technical Specification Action Statement Log Index (3)
TECH SPEC NUMBER SAP LCO ORDER NUMBER SAP LCO NUMBER (PERMIT NUMBER)
ENTRY DATE TIME EXIT DATE TIME
SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION Do to the large volume of items required to be tracked during Refuel Outages, the Operations Department utilizes an electronic version (SAP) of the Technical Specification Action Statement Log Index to monitor Tech Spec Action Statements. This is only an example of the basic format of that index.
(1)
Fill-in Station name (2)
Fill-in Station Unit number (3)
Fill-in Refuel Outage designation
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 33 of 75 ATTACHMENT 4 OPERABILITY EVALUATION (OPEVAL) LOG (Page 1 of 1)
NUCR# UNIT SYSTEM DESCRIPTION ENTERED (DATE)
OPEVAL DUE DATE OPEVAL ASSIGNED TO CLOSURE DATE
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 34 of 75 ATTACHMENT 5 CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR SEALING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS DURING FUEL HANDLING AND CORE ALTERATIONS (Page 1 of 2)
Order #
Section 1 - DESCRIPTION OF PENETRATION (REFER TO Exhibit 5 and HC.OP-AB.CONT-0003(Q), as necessary, to clearly describe the Penetration)
Section 2 - CONTINGENCY PLAN (Provide a detailed description of actions required to close the penetration.
REFER TO Attachment 5, Page 2 for typical examples of acceptable contingency plans.)
Section 3 - INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING PENETRATION (Log Individuals Name for each Shift penetration is Open. Use Additional Sheets as necessary)
Date Shift Name Method of Contact CRS Inits Section 4 - PENETRATION RESTORATION (Record Date and Time that Penetration was restored to Operable)
Date/Time Initials
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 35 of 75 ATTACHMENT 5 CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR SEALING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PENETRATIONS DURING FUEL HANDLING AND CORE ALTERATIONS (Page 2 of 2)
Examples of Contingency Plans - These actions do not require that the penetration be fully restored to its original design. They need to be sufficient to assure that the ventilation system will be capable of drawing air into the building and exhausting it through a monitored pathway.
In addition, they need to be able to be accomplished within 30 minutes.
Doors - One door in air lock remains capable of being closed. Cables, hoses, or other materials routed through the air lock are capable of being rapidly disconnected by a Nuclear Equipment Operator with little or no notice to users of the equipment. For example, an air hose supplying breathing air to a worker would not meet this condition in that if it were rapidly disconnected it could jeopardize workers safety.
Hatches - Similar to doors, the hatch is capable of being closed. Closing the hatch does not require any special lifting or rigging equipment not normally operated by a Nuclear Equipment Operator. Cables, hoses, or other materials routed through the air lock are capable of being rapidly disconnected by a Nuclear Equipment Operator with little or no notice to users of the equipment.
Open Penetrations - Material such as Herculite and Tape or other material that require minimal effort to install are at the work location to cover the opening. Any time the opening is left unattended by the responsible work group, the opening is covered. Any time the penetration is open; the Control Room is provided with a contact for closing the penetration if required.
These actions do not require that the penetration be fully restored to its original design. They need to be sufficient to assure that the ventilation system will be capable of drawing air into the building and exhausting it through a monitored pathway.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 36 of 75 EXHIBIT 1 PLANNED REMOVAL OF EQUIPMENT FOR SERVICE FLOWCHART (Page 1 of 1)
PLANNED MAINTENANCE/
TESTING IAW NC.WM-AP.ZZ-0001 SCC TECH SPEC SAFETY RELATED IMPORTANT TO SAFETY DETERMINE IMPACT ON SSC OPERABILITY SSC WILL REMAIN OPERABLE OPERABLE BUT DEGRADED1 DO NOT AUTHORIZE PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVITY.
FURTHER PLANNING REQUIRED.
REFER TO NC.WM-AP.ZZ-0001(Q)
A DOES ACTIVITY IMPACT RISK SIGNIFICANT SYSTEM VALIDATE PLANT CONDITIONS CONSISTENT WITH RISK ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AUTHORIZE PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVITY NO YES NO NO YES YES YES NO IMPACT ON CURRENT RISK ASSESSMENT EVALUATION ASSESS IMPACT ON SAFETY.
IMPLEMENT COMPENSATORY MEASURES AS REQUIRED AUTHORIZE PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVITY IMPACT ON CURRENT RISK ASSESSMENT EVALUATION A
AUTHORIZE PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVITY IS SSC TECH SPEC/
LAOT/APPENDIX R RELATED SSC WILL BE INOPERABLE A
IMPLEMENT TECH SPEC LCO/LAOT/APPENDIX R ACTION STATEMENT TRACKING NO YES DETERMINE IMPACT ON RISK SIGNIFICANT SYSTEM AVAILABILITY IS SSC RENDERED UNAVAILABLE IMPLEMENT A(4) OR APPENDIX R COMPENSATORY
- MEASURES, AS REQUIRED YES NO
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 37 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 1 of 24)
Hope Creek Station has implemented Licensee Controlled Allowable Outage Times (LAOTs) for certain equipment not specifically addressed in T/S. These AOTs have been developed as the result of various reviews of the existing licensing basis and have been developed as corrective actions to ensure compliance with the requirements of the existing licensing basis. The following tables include all existing LAOTs, a description, bases, and required actions for each, as well as reference to any commitment associated with the LAOT. Note that the Required Actions are based on an assumed set of plant conditions. If the Required Actions cannot be complied with, the Screening SRO can evaluate other system or plant conditions to determine if extenuating circumstances associated with the conditions renders the system as either Operable, Operable but Degraded, or Non-Conforming.
The annotation ** [TSI] ** indicates that this item was carried over from previous T/S Interpretations and the Required Action is related to T/S required action. This exhibit additionally provides guidance on determining the OPERABILITY of various plant equipment based upon technical evaluations and provides for consistency for actions taken for inoperable equipment.
CONTENTS -Affected Equipment Page 1-BH-V013 SLC TANK 10-T-204 AIR SPARGER SUPPLY VALVE 3 of 24 When a support or supported system is declared INOPERABLE in one train 3 of 24 TSC Chillers (1A-K-403/1B-K-403) 4 & 5 of 24 Control Room Chiller (1A-K-400/1B-K-400) 5 of 24 HPCI/RCIC Jockey Pumps (1A-P-228/1B-P-228) 6 of 24 ECCS Jockey Pumps 6 of 24 C and D Emergency Diesel Generators (1C-G-400/1D-G-400) 7 of 24 RHR Pumps 1A-P-202, 1B-P-202, 1C-P-202, and 1D-P-202 8 of 24 RCIC Room Coolers (1AVH-208/1BVH-208) 9 of 24 HPCI Room Coolers (1AVH-209/1BVH-209) 9 of 24 Core Spray Pumps 1A-P-206, 1B-P-206, 1C-P-206, and 1D-P-206 9 of 24 RHR Room Coolers (1AVH-210/1EVH-210) (1BVH-210/1FVH-210)
(1CVH-210/1GVH-210) (1DVH-210/1HVH-210) 10 of 24 Core Spray Room Coolers (1AVH-211/1EVH-211) (1BVH-211/1FVH-211)
(1CVH-211/1GVH-211) (1DVH-211/1HVH-211) 10 of 24 SACS Room Coolers (1AVH-214/1CVH-214) (1BVH-214/1DVH-214) 10 of 24 TSC Emergency Filter Unit 00-VH313 10 of 24 TSC Supply Unit 00-VH314 11 of 24 Remote Shutdown Panel Cooler 00-VH316 11 of 24 Control Area Battery Room Exhaust Fan (1A-V-410/1B-V-410) 11 of 24 EDG Room Recirc Units (1A-V-412/1E-V-412) (1B-V-412/1F-V-412)
(1C-V-412/1G-V-412) (1D-V-412/1H-V-412) 12 of 24 Battery Room Exhaust Fan (1A-V-416/1B-V-416) 12 of 24 (continued on next page)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 38 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 2 of 24)
CONTENTS -Affected Equipment (Continued)
Page SWIS Supply Fans (1A-V-503/1C-V-503/1B-V-503/1D-V-503)
AND SWIS Exhaust Fans (1A-V-504/1C-V-504/1B-V-504/1D-V-504) 12 of 24 Main Steam Line Monitor Setpoint Adjustment Requirements 13 of 24 Clarification of Containment Isolation Valve Requirements 13 of 24 SW Pumps (1A-P-502, 1B-P-502, 1C-P-502 & 1D-P-502) 14 of 24 SACS Heat Exchanger SW Outlet Valves (1EAHV-2355A, 1EAHV-2355B, 1EAHV-2371A & 1EAHV-2371B) 14 of 24 SACS Pumps (1A-P-210, 1B-P-210, 1C-P-210, & 1D-P-210) 15 of 24 FRVS Vent Fans (1A-V-206 & 1B-V-206) 15 of 24 FRVS Radiation Monitoring System 15 of 24 Control Room Emergency Filter Unit 1A(B)-V400 15 of 24 SACS to TACS Isolation Vlv EG-HV-2522A-D, EG-HV-2596A-D 16 of 24 SSWS to RACS Isolation Vlv EA-HV-2203, 2204, 2207, 2346 16 of 24 Reactor Auxiliaries Cooling and Safety Auxiliaries Cooling Radiation Monitoring 16 of 24 Loss of 1E 4160/480 VAC BUS 17 of 24 T/S 3.3.2 and Bases as it applies to: RWCU, RCIC, HPCI, RHR SDC 17 of 24 T/S 3.3.2 and Bases as it applies to: RBE/RFE Radiation Monitors 17 of 24 ODCM Table 4.3.7.10-1 Instrument 1b - Channel Check Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radioactivity Monitor 1SPRE-4557 (1AP168 or 1BP168 Turbine Bldg Circ Water Dewatering Sump Pump (TBCWDS) removal from service))
17 of 24 Reactor Building Back Draft Dampers:
PD-9428A1, A2, PD-9428B1, B2, PD-9429A1, A2, PD-9432A1, A2, PD-9432B1, B2, PD-9433A1, A2, PD-9433B1, B2, PD-9434A1, A2, PD-9434B1, B2, PD-9435A1, A2, PD-9435B1, B2, PD-9436A1, A2, PD-9436B1, B2, PD-9437A1, A2, PD-9437B1, B2, PD-9438A1, A2, PD-9438B1, B2, PD-9438C1, C2, PD-9438D1, D2, PD-9438E1, E2, PD-9438F1, F2, PD-9439A1, A2, PD-9439B1, B2, PD-9457A1, A2 18 of 24 Control Rods (excessive friction due to channel distortion) 18 of 24 Main Condenser Offgas Treatment Monitoring Instrumentation 19 of 24 Refuel Floor Polar Crane (10H200) 20 of 24 Refueling Platform 20 of 24 During Handling of Fuel and Core Alterations when Secondary Containment and FRVS Actuation is NOT Required 21 of 24 APRM Deviation >2% (absolute value) from RATED THERMAL POWER During Planned Operations Evolution (Power Maneuver) (after approx. five min. of steady-state operation) 22 of 24 SSW Emergency Make-Up 23 of 24 H2O2 Analyzers 23 of 24 ECCS System AP check valves 24 of 24 PCIG Receivers 24 of 24
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 39 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 3 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action 1-BH-V013 SLC TANK 10-T-204 AIR SPARGER SUPPLY VALVE Running the SLC pumps with sparging air in-service has the potential to reduce SLC pumping capacity below the minimum required for system operability.
[PR 990519182]
Whenever sparging air is aligned to the SLC Tank TAKE the required actions IAW Technical Specifications for both SLC trains being INOPERABLE.
[PR 990519182]
However, the SLC System may still be considered AVAILABLE for Maintenance Rule purposes.
[80024759]
WHEN a support or supported system is declared INOPERABLE in one train.
If the redundant train is not OPERABLE (i.e., complete capability to perform the specified safety function has been lost. This includes on-site emergency power sources regardless of their T/S status.).
(For example, when a single EDG is declared INOPERABLE, evaluate whether other EDG supported equipment on the redundant electrical busses are capable of fulfilling their specified safety function(s) under design-basis accident conditions. If the redundant components can not be relied upon to fully satisfy their intended safety function then appropriate conservative action must be taken up to and including entry into T/S 3.0.3, as appropriate.)
(Reference Generic Letter 91-18)
TAKE the required actions IAW Technical Specifications for both trains INOPERABLE.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 40 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 4 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action TSC Chillers (1A-K-403/
(Continued)
Due to concerns regarding adequate ventilation for critical components and operability of the Class 1E Switchgear, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of 1 or 2 TSC Chilled Water subsystems.
(CR 980409079, CRCA 03)
With 1 TSC Chilled Water subsystem INOPERABLE, RESTORE the subsystem to an OPERABLE status within 30 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
With 2 TSC Chilled Water subsystems INOPERABLE, RESTORE at least 1 subsystem to OPERABLE status within 18 hours2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
In addition, IF any room listed in Figure 1 of HC.OP-AB.HVAC-0001(Q) exceeds an average ambient temperature of 100°F during the 18 hour2.083333e-4 days <br />0.005 hours <br />2.97619e-5 weeks <br />6.849e-6 months <br /> period, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 41 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 5 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action Provides guidance for chiller operable when back-up air supply bottle(s) for the SACS Pressure Control Valve PCV-2393A(B) indicates less then the required pressure.
[CR 980409175]
IF ONE back-up air supply bottle for the SACS Pressure Control Valve PCV-2393A(B) indicates
< 1400 psi, THEN the bottle must be replaced with 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> OR DECLARE the associated chiller inoperable IF BOTH air supply bottles for the SACS Pressure Control Valve PCV-2393A(B) indicates < 1400 psi, THEN DECLARE the associated chiller inoperable.
Provides guidance for chiller operability when the purge and pump out unit are energized (breaker/disconnect closed)
WHEN the breaker or disconnect is closed for the purge and pump out unit THEN DECLARE associated chiller inoperable.
[70017250]
Provides guidance for chiller operable when back-up air supply bottle(s) for the SACS Pressure Control Valve PCV-2499A(B) indicates less then the required pressure.
[CR 980409175]
IF ONE back-up air supply bottle for the SACS Pressure Control Valve PCV-2499A(B) indicates < 1400 psi, THEN the bottle must be replaced with 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> OR DECLARE the associated chiller inoperable IF BOTH air supply bottles for the SACS Pressure Control Valve PCV-2499A(B) indicates < 1400 psi, THEN DECLARE the associated chiller inoperable.
Provides guidance for chiller operability when the purge and pump out unit is energized (breaker/disconnect closed)
WHEN the breaker or disconnect is closed for the purge and pump THEN DECLARE associated chiller inoperable.
[70017250]
Control Room Chiller (1A-K-400/
Provides guidance for chiller operability when A(B)K400 Chiller is OFF not in ON/AUTO Placing A(B)K400 Chiller to OFF not in ON/AUTO does not make its associated CREF unit inoperable since the chiller will still start on a LOP/LOCA sequencer signal if in manual. Automatic start on Intake High Rad is defeated, however, CREF remains operable based on manual action to place the train in-service following a High Rad start signal being permissible in accordance with the plant-licensing basis.
[70006639, 70037054]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 42 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 6 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action HPCI/RCIC Jockey Pumps (1A-P-228/
- [TSI] **
Post LOCA feedwater line sealing is described in the UFSAR Section 6.2.3.2.3, Containment Bypass leakage. The system is manually aligned to establish flow from the HPCI/RCIC Jockey Pumps, through the injection lines to the feedwater headers.
IF either Jockey Pump becomes non functional, feedwater line sealing is accomplished by opening the crosstie valve (T/S Interpretation)
WITH either HPCI OR RCIC Jockey Pump not functional, provided the crosstie valve 1AEHV-4144 is functional, RESTORE the non functional Jockey Pump to functional status within 38 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
WITH 1AEHV-4144 not functional, provided both Jockey Pumps are functional, RESTORE the not functional valve to functional status within 38 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
OTHERWISE, RESTORE feed water sealing functionality within 4 hrs OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
ECCS Jockey Pumps *
[PR 980115182]
BPCA 02 With an ECCS Jockey Pump de-energized or tripped IF the loop low pressure alarm is received, DECLARE the associated ECCS loop(s) INOP.
RESTORE keep fill OR PLACE Alternate Keep Fill in service AND PERFORM Loop Fill and Vent.
IF the Fill and Vent renders no air, THEN the Loop is considered to have been OPERABLE.
Regarding preventive or corrective maintenance or periodic testing of the jockey pumps, UFSAR Section 6.3.2.2 states: "Under these conditions, the jockey pump is removed from service in accordance with station administrative controls which ensure that the impact on system operability is assessed and appropriate compensatory actions are considered and implemented. Additionally, only a single jockey pump, associated with an operable ECCS or RCIC system is removed from service at a time."
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 43 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 7 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action C and D Emergency Diesel Generators (1C-G-400/
Prior to entering a planned extended outage (14 day) of the C or D EDG, ENSURE the following items are satisfied.
(CR 970130256)
- 1. ENSURE all other systems, trains or components required for accident mitigation are OPERABLE.
This does not preclude testing or operation of components in the same train / channel as the inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator.
- 2. MINIMIZE the removal from service other safety systems, important to safety systems OR any offsite power systems from service.
- 3. The intent of the planned, extended entry into the AOT is for required modifications OR CM/PM activities.
- 4. ENSURE overall unavailability will not exceed greater than 720 hrs. per rolling 12 month period, (System Manager).
- 5. Component testing or maintenance that increases the likelihood of a plant transient should be avoided.
This does not preclude testing or operation of components in the same train / channel as the inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator. No production risk activities should be scheduled, with the exception of the weekly manual scram surveillance. Emergent production risk activities that arise during the extended AOT period may be performed but should be evaluated for risk to determine if they should be postponed until the return of DG availability. If power maneuvers are not classified as production risk, then power can be moved using normal plant operating procedures.
- 6. ENTRY into the extended AOT should not occur IF adverse weather conditions are expected.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 44 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 8 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action RHR Pumps 1A-P-202, 1B-P-202, 1C-P-202, and 1D-P-202 While in a secondary mode of operation with its respective test return valve open, the time lag for the repositioning of the test return valve will prevent rated injection into the Reactor Vessel upon pump re-start beyond UFSAR acceptance limitations (test return valves stroke times exceed the required LPCI injection time).
For operability purposes, while in a secondary mode of operation with an RHR Test Return valve open, DECLARE the associated LPCI mode INOPERABLE.
[70040545]
B RHR pump 1B-P-202 should be declared INOPERABLE for LPCI mode when it is used in let-down mode.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 45 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 9 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action RCIC Room Coolers (1AVH-208/
The RCIC Room Coolers, which are 100% redundant, are required to be operable to maintain adequate ventilation for safety related plant equipment.
WITH 1 RCIC Room Cooler INOPERABLE, ENTER a Tracking LCO WITH both RCIC Room Coolers INOPERABLE, DECLARE the RCIC System INOPERABLE AND RESTORE at least 1 Room Cooler to OPERABLE status within 14 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND REDUCE Reactor steam dome pressure to less than or equal to 150 psig within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
The HPCI Room Coolers, which are 100% redundant, are required to be operable to maintain adequate ventilation for safety related plant equipment.
With 1 HPCI Room Cooler INOPERABLE, ENTER a Tracking LCO, WITH both HPCI Room Coolers INOPERABLE, DECLARE the HPCI System INOPERABLE.
Core Spray Pumps 1A-P-206, 1B-P-206, 1C-P-206, and 1D-P-206 While in a secondary mode of operation with its respective test return valve open, the time lag for the repositioning of the test return valve will prevent rated injection into the Reactor Vessel upon pump re-start beyond UFSAR acceptance limitations (test return valves stroke times exceed the required CS injection time).
While in a secondary mode of operation WITH its respective test return valve open, DECLARE the affected loop of Core Spray INOPERABLE.
[70040545]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 46 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 10 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action RHR Room Coolers (1AVH-210/
(1BVH-210/
(1CVH-210/
(1DVH-210/
The RHR Room Coolers, which are 100%
redundant, are required to be operable to maintain adequate ventilation for safety related plant equipment.
With 1 RHR Pump Room Cooler per RHR Pump Room INOPERABLE, ENTER a Tracking LCO, WITH both RHR Pump Room Coolers INOPERABLE, DECLARE the RHR Pump INOPERABLE.
Core Spray Room Coolers (1AVH-211/
(1BVH-211/
(1CVH-211/
(1DVH-211/
The Core Spray Pump Room Coolers, which are 100% redundant, are required to be operable to maintain adequate ventilation for safety related plant equipment.
WITH 1 Core Spray Pump Room Cooler per Core Spray Room INOPERABLE, ENTER a Tracking LCO, WITH both Core Spray Pump Room Coolers INOPERABLE, DECLARE the Core Spray Pump INOPERABLE.
SACS Room Coolers (1AVH-214/
(1BVH-214/
The SACS Room Coolers, which are 100%
redundant, are required to be operable to maintain adequate ventilation for safety related plant equipment.
WITH 1 SACS Pump Room Cooler per SACS Room INOPERABLE, ENTER a Tracking LCO, WITH both SACS Pump Room Coolers INOPERABLE, DECLARE the SACS Loop INOPERABLE.
TSC Emergency Filter Unit 00-VH313 Due to concerns regarding adequate ventilation for critical components and habitability of the TSC, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of the TSC Emergency Filter Unit.
WITH the TSC Emergency Filter Unit INOPERABLE, RESTORE the unit to an OPERABLE status within 35 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 47 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 11 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action TSC Supply Unit 00-VH314 Due to concerns regarding adequate ventilation for critical components and habitability of the TSC, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of the TSC Supply Unit WITH the TSC Supply Unit INOPERABLE, RESTORE the unit to an OPERABLE status within 35 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Remote Shutdown Panel Cooler 00-VH316 Due to concerns regarding adequate ventilation for critical components and habitability of the Remote Shutdown Panel, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of the RSP Cooler.
WITH the Remote Shutdown Panel Cooler INOPERABLE, RESTORE the unit to an OPERABLE status within 35 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Control Area Battery Room Exhaust Fan (1A-V-410/
Due to concerns regarding adequate exhaust ventilation for the battery rooms, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of the Control Area Battery Room Exhaust Fan.
WITH 1 Control Area Battery Room Exhaust Fan INOPERABLE, RESTORE the subsystem to OPERABLE status within 35 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 48 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 12 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action EDG Room Recirc Units (1A-V-412/
(1B-V-412/
(1C-V-412/
(1D-V-412/
Due to concerns regarding adequate ventilation for the EDG rooms, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of the 100%
redundant EDG Room Recirc Units.
WITH 1 EDG Room Recirc Unit INOPERABLE,
- 1) REALIGN the remaining recirc fan for single fan operation IAW HC.OP-SO.GM-0001 ONLY if river temperature is above OR expected to rise above 80°F.
- 2) IF river temperature is greater than 80°F, AND the SACS to RHR HX outlet valve (HV-2512) is open on the same SACS loop as the failed EDG cooler AND the required realignment has not been completed, DECLARE the affected EDG inoperable.
Battery Room Exhaust Fan (1A-V-416/
Due to concerns regarding adequate exhaust ventilation for the battery rooms, a LAOT has been established for the inoperability of the Battery Room Exhaust Fan.
WITH 1 Battery Room Exhaust Fan INOPERABLE, RESTORE the subsystem to OPERABLE status within 35 days OR be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> AND COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
AND SWIS Exhaust Fans (1A-V-504/
Provide guidance during the inoperability of SWIS Supply and Exhaust fans.
WITH any SWIS Ventilation Train INOPERABLE ENTER a Tracking LCO, against the SSW Loop.
ESTABLISH appropriate temperature monitoring, as required.
In any fan alignment, WITH the average ambient temperature in the associated areas >104°F THEN:
- 1) INITIATE a Notification.
- 3) ASSIGN a CRFA to Engineering to confirm within 72 hrs.
- 4) CONTINUE to assess SSW Loop Operability.
IF SSW Loop component performance does not support continued operability, OR new information suggests the SSW system will not perform its design function, THEN declare the associated SSW Loop INOPERABLE.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 49 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 13 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action Main Steam Line Monitor Setpoint Adjustment Requirements
- [TSI] **
Provides guidance as to when the steam line monitor setpoints must be adjusted to lower values following a HWCI trip OR removal from service.
(CR 960402321)
(CR 970912142)
After reaching 20% of RATED THERMAL POWER, the normal full power background radiation level and associated trip setpoints will be increased within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to levels previously measured during full power operation with hydrogen injection. Prior to decreasing below 20% of RATED THERMAL POWER, the background level and associated setpoint shall be returned to the normal full power values.
Additionally, Table 3.3.2-1 note (b) Also trips and isolates the mechanical vacuum pumps is an informational note and is not to be interpreted as a Tech Spec requirement.
Clarification of Containment Isolation Valve Requirements
- [TSI] **
Clarifications of actions required in T/S 3.6.3 regarding isolation of a penetration versus isolation of a flow path.
Clarification of 3.6.3 isolation of affected penetration flow path. The intention is to eliminate the possibility of a single active failure, which would result in an un-isolatable flow path. INOPERABLE Containment isolation valves may be utilized to isolate the affected penetration flow path as long as there is reasonable assurance that the valve is fully seated.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 50 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 14 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action SW Pumps (1A-P-502, 1B-P-502, 1C-P-502 &
- [TSI] **
When SW Pumps are placed in MANUAL the following auto start signals are defeated:
Non-Emergency Start, High-High Radiation in the Reactor Building, High-High Radiation on the Refuel Floor and Level 2 in the Reactor Vessel. Auto LOP/LOCA sequencer starts are not affected.
(CR 970603128 CRCA #06)
Service Water Pumps left out of service in MANUAL are to be declared INOPERABLE during Modes 1, 2, 3, & *.
- WHEN handling recently irradiated fuel in the Secondary Containment.
SACS Heat Exchanger SW Outlet Valves (1EAHV-2355A, 1EAHV-2355B, 1EAHV-2371A &
- [TSI] **
When Valves are placed in MANUAL all auto open signals are defeated except LOP/LOCA sequencer signals (CR 970603128 CRCA #06)
WHEN Service Water Valves 1EAHV-2355A, 1EAHV-2355B, 1EAHV-2371A & 1EAHV-2371B are left closed in MANUAL, the associated heat exchanger is to be declared INOPERABLE during Modes 1, 2, 3, & *.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 51 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 15 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action SACS Pumps (1A-P-210, 1B-P-210, 1C-P-210,
& 1D-P-210)
- [TSI] **
When SACS Pumps are placed in MANUAL the following auto start signals are defeated for A
& B: High-High Radiation in the Reactor Building, High-High Radiation on the Refuel Floor and Level 2 in the Reactor Vessel. The following auto start signal is defeated for C & D:
Auto start from the associated CW loop. Auto LOP/LOCA sequencer starts are not affected.
(CR 970603128 CRCA #06)
SACS Pumps left out of service in MANUAL are to be declared INOPERABLE during Modes 1, 2, 3, & **.
- WHEN handling recently irradiated fuel in the Secondary Containment.
- [TSI] **
When FRVS Vent Fans are placed in Manual, all auto start signals are defeated, including LOCA sequencer starts.
FRVS Vent Fans placed in MANUAL are to be declared INOPERABLE in all Modes.
FRVS Radiation Monitoring System When FRVS RMS is INOPERABLE.
ACTIVE T/S 3.3.7.5 is entered, 72 hrs to restore.
Tracking ODCM 3.3.7.11 is entered, no samples required unless FRVS is in service.
Control Room Emergency Filter Unit 1A(B)-V400 Placing a A(B)P400 Control Area Chilled Water pump in MAN or a A(B)K400 Chiller to OFF not in ON/AUTO does not make its associated CREF unit inoperable since the pump and chiller will still start on a LOP/LOCA sequencer signal if in manual. Automatic start on Intake High Radiation is defeated, however, CREF remains operable based on manual action to place the train in-service following a High Radiation start signal being permissible in accordance with the plant licensing basis.
[70006639]
None
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 52 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 16 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action SACS TO TACS ISOLATION VLV EG-HV-2522A-D, EG-HV-2496A-D
[PR 990112136]
If the INOP valve AND redundant valve are open If the redundant valve is closed, DECLARE the associated SACS loop INOP, CLOSE AND DEACTIVATE EITHER the INOP valve OR its redundant valve within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
The LCO may then be taken to tracking status (Primary T/S 3.7.1.1)
DEACTIVATE the redundant valve OR CLOSE AND DEACTIVATE the INOP valve AND ENTER a tracking LCO for the affected SACS loop (Primary T/S 3.7.1.1)
(SACS TO TACS ISOLATION VLVS may be considered deactivated by selecting LOCKOUT.)
SSWS TO RACS ISOLATION VLV EA-HV-2203, 2204, 2207, 2346
[PR 990112136]
[70035190]
If EA-HV-2203 OR EA-HV-2204 are INOP DECLARE the associated Service Water loop INOP (Primary T/S 3.7.1.2)
AND CLOSE AND DEACTIVATE the affected valve in the closed position. The LCO may then be taken to tracking status (Primary T/S 3.7.1.2)
If EA-HV-2207 AND/OR EA-HV-2346 are INOP:
PRESERVE the operability of one Service Water loop by closing either 2203 or 2204. The loop then supplying the RACS heat exchangers will be rendered INOP due to the lack of redundant isolation capability considering a single active failure (Primary T/S 3.7.1.2)
Reactor Auxiliaries Cooling and Safety Auxiliaries Cooling Radiation Monitoring Removal of a RACS or a SACS loop from service does not cause the associated radiation monitor to become incapable of performing its specified function.
None T/S Table 3.3.7.1-1 requires no action when a RACS or a SACS loop is removed from service. [80059526]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 53 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 17 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action LOSS OF 1E 4160/480 VAC BUS
[PR980115182]
BPCA 05 If a 4160 or 480 VAC bus is lost:
ENTER Tech Spec 3.8.1 AND CONSIDER Exhibit 3 item:
"WHEN a support or supported system is declared INOPERABLE in one train."
T/S 3.3.2 and Bases as it applies to:
RWCU RCIC HPCI RHR SDC If Note (e) applies to the Minimum Operable Channels per Trip System in Table 3.3.2-1.
Action 3.3.2.b applies for all cases in which less than the minimum required number of channels are OPERABLE.
WHEN NEITHER isolation logic (inboard or outboard)
Meets the minimum OPERABLE channels requirement, IMPLEMENT Action 3.3.2.b.1.a.
T/S 3.3.2 and Bases as it applies to:
RBE/RFE Radiation Monitors RBE/RFE Radiation Monitor inputs to PCIS consist of three sensors feeding four separate two-out-of-three logics (one two of three logic per PCIS Channel)
For one channel INOPERABLE, IMPLEMENT Action 3.3.2.b.1.c OR TAKE the Action in Table 3.3.2-1.
For two or more channels INOPERABLE IMPLEMENT Action 3.3.2.b.1.a For ALL inoperable channels OR within one hour, TAKE the Action in Table 3.3.2-1.
1AP168 or 1BP168 Turbine Bldg Circ Water Dewatering Sump Pumps (TBCWDS)
ODCM Table 4.3.7.10-1 Instrument 1b - Channel Check for the Turbine Building Circulating Water Dewatering Sump Radioactivity Monitor System includes a verification of sample flow through the radiation monitor 1SPRE-4557 during sump pump operation.
ENTER tracking LCO for TBCWDS Radiation Monitor 1SPRE-4557 WHEN a TBCWDS pump(s) is removed from service to ensure surveillance requirements of HC.OP-DL.ZZ-0026(Q), Surveillance Log, d are met when pump(s) is returned to service. [70041891]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 54 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 18 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action Reactor Building Back Draft Dampers PD-9428A1, A2 PD-9428B1, B2 PD-9429A1, A2 PD-9432A1, A2 PD-9432B1, B2 PD-9433A1, A2 PD-9433B1, B2 PD-9434A1, A2 PD-9434B1, B2 PD-9435A1, A2 PD-9435B1, B2 PD-9436A1, A2 PD-9436B1, B2 PD-9437A1, A2 PD-9437B1, B2 PD-9438A1, A2 PD-9438B1, B2 PD-9438C1, C2 PD-9438D1, D2 PD-9438E1, E2 PD-9438F1, F2 PD-9439A1, A2 PD-9439B1, B2 PD-9457A1, A2 Steam flooding isolation (back draft) dampers have an active, safety related function to contain the steam resulting from a pipe break within the compartment, and to prevent the spread of steam through HVAC openings or ductwork to adjacent areas.
(UFSAR 9.4.2.3)
WITH one or more in series back draft dampers INOPERABLE in an open duct, RESTORE the damper(s) to an OPERABLE status within 7 days, OR CLOSE a damper in the affected duct OR ISOLATE the high-energy line into the compartment (room) protected by the INOPERABLE damper(s).
[80005604, 70000420]
Control Rods Excessive friction between a control rod and the fuel bundles surrounding the control rod may impact scram function, fuel bundle lift, and Safety Limit MCPR.
Operability criteria are specified in HC.RE-RA.BF-0002(Q), Fuel Channel Distortion Monitoring, and are consistent with SC06-12, Surveillance Program for Channel-Control Blade Interference Monitoring.
Declare the affected control rod inoperable IAW T/S 3.1.3.1.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 55 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 19 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action Main Condenser Offgas Treatment Monitoring Instrumentation Explosive Gas Monitoring program provides controls for potentially explosive gas mixtures contained in the Main Condenser Offgas Treatment System. [T/S 6.8.4.d]
The hydrogen monitor shall have a minimum of one (1) channel operable during operation of the main condenser air ejector. [CD-450A]
Otherwise, IF neither channel is operable, operation of the main condenser offgas treatment system may continue provided grab samples are collected at least once per four (4) hours and analyzed within the following four (4) hours. Otherwise, with the monitors out of service in excess of 30 days, continue the four (4) hour sampling and analysis intervals and have senior management consider alternate options, including unit shutdown.
NOTE - The off gas system is considered in-service when the SJAE is taking suction from the main condenser and sending the gas flow to the off gas system. (i.e.., when the HV-1968 valves are open).
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 56 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 20 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action Refuel Floor Polar Crane (10H200)
UFSAR Section 9.1.4.2.12.4 states:
With fuel assemblies in the spent fuel storage pool racks, loads in excess of 1200 pounds shall be prohibited from travel over fuel assemblies in the spent fuel storage pool racks unless handled by a single failure proof handling system.
With the above requirements not satisfied, place the polar crane load in a safe condition.
WITH the Polar Crane Surveillances not current or polar crane otherwise known to be inoperable, DECLARE the Crane INOP IAW Section 5.3 AND PREVENT crane operation IAW OP-AA-109-115.
Refueling Platform UFSAR Section 9.1.4.2.12.3 states:
During handling of fuel assemblies or control rods within the reactor pressure vessel, the refueling platform shall be operable with the main hoist to be used for handling fuel assemblies or control rods within the reactor pressure vessel and the frame-mounted or monorail-mounted auxiliary hoists to be used for handling control rods within the reactor pressure vessel.
With the requirements for refueling platform operability not satisfied, suspend use of any inoperable refueling platform equipment from operations involving the handling of control rods and fuel assemblies within the reactor pressure vessel after placing the load in a safe condition.
WITH the Refueling Platform Surveillances not current or otherwise known to be inoperable, DECLARE the Refueling Platform Hoist INOP IAW Sec 5.3 AND PREVENT Refueling Platform Hoist operation IAW OP-AA-109-115.
EXHIBIT 2 OP-HC-1 08:-115-1 001 Revision 10 Pa£Je 57 of 75 TIS IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 21 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description IRegulatory Basis Required Action During Handling of Fuel and Core Alterations when Secondary Containment and FRVS Actuation is NOT Required, the Following Conditions SHALL BE MET:
,----------------:-:-::--:--------r::-::----
Building Will be operating and will be IF not operating and capab Ie of Ventilation capable of drawing air into the drawing air into the building and (for Secondary building and exhausting through a exhausting through a monitDred Containment) monitored pathway.
pathway
[TIS 3/4.6.5, Secondary THEN, SUSPEND Fuel Hal1dling and Containment Bases]
~------------_+_---------------1 Contingency Plan(s) are required to IF conditions develop that vvould Contingency Plans (For Secondary Containment) be in place to promptly close at least prevent implementation of any active one door in each airlock and cover Contingency Plan all Secondary Containment THEN, SUSPEND Fuel Hal1dling and breaches (within 3D-minutes), in the CORE ALTERATIONS.
event of a fuel handling accident.
Contingency Plan(s) assure that building ventilation will draw air into the building and exhaust through a monitored pathway.
A Contingency Plan for each Secondary Containment Breach is documented using Attachment 5, and, placed with Form 1, Technical Specification Action Statement Log.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 58 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 22 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description
/Regulatory Basis Required Action APRM Deviation >2% (absolute value) from RATED THERMAL POWER During Planned Operations Evolution (Power Maneuver) (after approx. five min. of steady-state operation)
- APRMs Inoperable on primary (A or B) channel
- APRMs Inoperable on alternate channel Required Action 1
0 LOG RE-ST.SE-0002 on to DL-26 Att. 5 for the APRM (T/S 3.3.1, TRACKING status, unlimited action time)
BYPASS the INOP APRM 1
1 LOG RE-ST.SE-0002 on to DL-26 Att. 5 for the APRMs (T/S 3.3.1, TRACKING status, unlimited action time)
BYPASS the INOP APRMs 2 or more 0
LOG RE-ST.SE-0002 on to DL-26 Att. 5 for the APRMs (T/S 3.3.1, ACTIVE status, action time = time the second APRM declared INOP + 12 hrs.)
ENSURE the first APRM declared INOP is bypassed.
CONSULT REs and identify the appropriate APRM adjustment window (bypass APRMs as required during adjustment)(See Note **)
2 or more 1
LOG RE-ST.SE-0002 on to DL-26 Att. 5 for the APRMs (T/S 3.3.1, ACTIVE status, action time = time the second primary channel APRM declared INOP + 12 hrs.)
ENSURE the first APRM declared INOP in each channel is bypassed.
CONSULT REs and identify the appropriate APRM adjustment window (bypass APRMs as required during adjustment)(See Note **)
2 or more 2 or more LOG RE-ST.SE-0002 on to DL-26 Att. 5 for the APRMs (T/S 3.3.1, ACTIVE status, action time = time the last APRM was declared inoperable + 1 hr.)
ENSURE the first APRM declared INOP in each channel is bypassed.
ADJUST APRMs within 1 hr. (bypass APRMs as required during adjustment)
Note ** To maintain consistency with other required action time responses (such as required samples), APRM adjustment should occur within 6 hrs (1/2 of the required action time).
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 59 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 23 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action SSW EMERGENCY MAKE-UP The SSWS is designed to supply a connection to add trucked in fresh water or supply an Emergency Back-Up source of water, via an inter-tie between the SSWS and the Residual Heat Removal (RHR)
System to flood the Reactor Containment during post-LOCA conditions and supply water to the Fuel Pool Cooling and Cleanup System. [70045241]
WITH 1 loop of Emergency Make-Up from SSW INOPERABLE, ENTER an LCO against T.S 4.0.5.
CONTACT Work Management to defer (excluding Surveillance Testing) all planned maintenance on the operable loop of Emergency Make-Up from SSW.
WITH 2 loops of Emergency Make-Up from SSW INOPERABLE, ENTER an LCO against T.S 4.0.5.
CONTACT Work Management to initiate immediate corrective maintenance to restore operability to one loop of Emergency Make-Up from SSW.
IF Emergency Make-Up from SSW is being credited via a OPEVAL due to excessive leakage from SACS or FPCC THEN, ENSURE the Diesel Driven Fire Pump or Salem Fire Header X-tie is available.
H2O2 ANALYZERS The Hydrogen/Oxygen Analyzer System (HOAS) is to measure the percentage of hydrogen and oxygen in the primary containment atmosphere. The operability of the accident monitoring instrumentation ensures that sufficient information is available on selected plant parameters to monitor and assess important variables following an accident WITH 1 H2O2 Analyzer INOPERABLE ENTER a Tracking LCO.
(with no reporting requirements)
WITH 2 H2O2 Analyzers INOPERABLE RESTORE at least one inoperable H2O2 Analyzer to OPERABLE status, OR INITIATE alternate method of monitoring the appropriate parameters within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
OR If alternate monitoring or restoration of one analyzer has not be accomplished within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, actions must continue until one analyzer is restored to OPERABLE status or an acceptable alternate method of monitoring is established, and a notification written to evaluate the impact of the delayed restoration of monitoring capability.
[UFSAR 6.2.5.2.5]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 60 of 75 EXHIBIT 2 T/S IMPLEMENTATION AND ALLOWABLE OUTAGE TIMES (LAOTs)
(Page 24 of 24)
Affected Equipment Description /Regulatory Basis Required Action ECCS System AP check valves (including RCIC) that supply keepfill When one or both check valves is (are) declared INOPERABLE (i.e.
Valve IST), entry into T/S 3.6.1 is required. The AP check valves supplying keepfill to ECCS systems are part of the extended containment boundary defined in the UFSAR.
CLOSE the manual valve that isolates the check valve(s) and apply a White Caution Tag (WCT). APPLY a WCT to the applicable jockey pump. WCT text to require SM/CRS permission prior to operation.
IF keepfill is required, and the manual isolation valve is opened, entry into T/S 3.6.1 is required and the one-hour action time is applicable. Work should be preplanned and briefed to minimize the time the LCO is active and in all cases will be less than one hour. It is not appropriate to allow keepfill to be lost and declare the system unavailable. This also would require a fill and vent to restore operability /
availability.
PCIG Receivers Low pressure in the PCIG receivers precludes successful operation of ads valves.
With one PCIG accumulator depressurized, or one receiver low pressure alarm inoperable, ENTER a tracking LCO against LCO 3.5.1.d for ADS.
With both PCIG receivers below 85 psig, ENTER active LCO for TS 3.5.1.d for ADS.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 61 of 75 EXHIBIT 3 EVENT DRIVEN T/S / ODCM / UFSAR SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT MATRIX (Page 1 of 4)
[PR 981115086]
Event Time/Action Requirement T/S / ODCM /
UFSAR Procedure POWER MANEUVERING Prior to Criticality &
during system heat-up Coolant temperature and pressure shall be determined to be to the right of the criticality limit line on Figure 3.4.6.1-3 prior to criticality and at least once per 30 minutes during system heat-up 4.4.6.1.2 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 OP-IO.ZZ-0003 OP-IO.ZZ-0007 Reactor Power exceeds 15% of Rated Drywell and Suppression Chamber Oxygen Concentrations shall be verified to be in specification within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 4.6.6.2 OP-ST.GS-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Complete a power change of at least 15% RTP in one hour NOTIFY Rad Pro and Chemistry to perform required samples.
Table 4.4.5-1 4(b)
ODCM Table 4.11.2.1.2-1(c)
& (f)
OP-IO.ZZ-0003 Reactor Power exceeds 24% of Rated VERIFY all APLHGRs < limits within COLR report within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />
& once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> thereafter.
4.2.1.a RE-ST.ZZ-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Reactor Power exceeds 24% of Rated VERIFY MCPR < applicable MCPR limit within COLR report within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />
& once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> thereafter.
4.2.3.a RE-ST.ZZ-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Reactor Power exceeds 24% of Rated VERIFY all LHGRs < limit within COLR report once 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />
& once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> thereafter.
4.2.4.a RE-ST.ZZ-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Plant Shutdown OR Startup NOTIFY Chemistry to perform required sample ODCM Table 4.11.2.1.2-1(c)
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 62 of 75 EXHIBIT 3 EVENT DRIVEN T/S / ODCM / UFSAR SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT MATRIX (Page 2 of 4)
Event Time/Action Requirement T/S / ODCM /
UFSAR Procedure POWER MANEUVERING continued Operating on a Limiting Control Rod Pattern VERIFY all APLHGRs < limits within COLR report initially
& once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> thereafter 4.2.1. b 4.1.4.3.b RE-ST.ZZ-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Operating on a Limiting Control Rod Pattern VERIFY MCPR < applicable MCPR limit within COLR report initially & once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> thereafter 4.2.3. b 4.1.4.3.b RE-ST.ZZ-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Operating on a Limiting Control Rod Pattern VERIFY all LHGRs < limit within COLR report initially
& once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> thereafter 4.2.4. b 4.1.4.3.b RE-ST.ZZ-0001 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Plant taken to Cold Shutdown for more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> PERFORM a channel functional test on the RPS MG set and alternate power supply EPA's unless performed in the previous six months 4.8.4.4.a MD-ST.SB-0005 Plant taken to Cold Shutdown for more than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> PERFORM a channel functional test on the NMS EPA's unless performed in the previous six months 4.8.4.6.a MD-ST.SB-0003 STUCK CONTROL ROD Detection of a withdrawn immovable control rod Within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> of detection of the immovable rod, DETERMINE the new Shutdown Margin 4.1.1.c RE-ST.ZZ-0007 Detection of a withdrawn immovable control rod MOVE each control rod one notch within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 4.1.3.1.2.b OP-ST.BF-0001 OP-AB.IC-0001
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 63 of 75 EXHIBIT 3 EVENT DRIVEN T/S / ODCM / UFSAR SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT MATRIX (Page 3 of 4)
Event Time/Action Requirement T/S / ODCM /
UFSAR Procedure SLC SBLC Tank Temperature Drops below 70°F DETERMINE the weight and concentration of the Sodium Pentaborate 4.1.5.b.2
- CH-TI.ZZ-0012 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 OP-SO.BH-0001 Both SBLC Heat Tracing Circuits have been found Inoperable DEMONSTRATE that all piping between the storage tank and the injection pumps is unblocked.
4.1.5.d.2**
OP-IS.BH-0001 OP-IS.BH-0002 OP-IS.BH-0003 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 CHEMISTRY Chlorides or pH are out of limit per UFSAR Table 5.2-8 INCREASE sampling frequency from every 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to every 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />.
UFSAR Section 5.2.3.2.2.2 /
Table 5.2-8 CH-TI.ZZ-0012 Conductivity recording capability is inoperable OBTAIN in-line conductivity measurements every 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> in Mode 1,2 or 3 OR every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> at all other times.
UFSAR Section 5.2.3.2.2.2 /
Table 5.2-8 CH-TI.ZZ-0012 SRV LIFT AND SUPPRESSION POOL TEMPERATURE Any SRV lifts Within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> CYCLE each Torus to Drywell Vacuum Breaker (The 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> clock begins when the last SRV closes or is closed following the plant transient or evolution which required the opening of the SRVs.)
4.6.4.1.b.1 OP-ST.GS-0004 Any SRV lifts and Torus Water temperature exceeds 177°F & RPV pressure is > 100 psig PERFORM an external inspection of the Torus 4.6.2.1.D RA-IS.ZZ-0004 Testing in progress which adds heat to the Torus VERIFY Torus temperature to be < 105°F at least once per five minutes 4.6.2.1.b.1 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Torus temperature is
> 95°F At least once per hour, VERIFY that Torus temperature is <
110°F 4.6.2.1.b.2.a OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Following a scram in OPCON 3 with torus temperature > 95°F At least once per 30 minutes, VERIFY Torus temperature is
< 120°F.
4.6.2.1.b.2.c OP-DL.ZZ-0026
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 64 of 75 EXHIBIT 3 EVENT DRIVEN T/S / ODCM / UFSAR SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENT MATRIX (Page 4 of 4)
Event Time/Action Requirement T/S / ODCM /
UFSAR Procedure CONTAINMENT VENT AND PURGE Before Venting or Purging Before opening the drywell and suppression chamber purge supply and exhaust, and nitrogen supply butterfly isolation valves shall be verified not to have been open for more than 500 hours0.00579 days <br />0.139 hours <br />8.267196e-4 weeks <br />1.9025e-4 months <br /> in the previous 365 days.
4.6.1.8.1 OP-AP.ZZ-0104 Within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> prior to venting & at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> during venting or purging of the drywell The containment shall be determined to be aligned for venting or purging through the RBVS, the FRVS or the hardened Torus vent ODCM 4.11.2.8 OP-SO.GS-0001 ACTS OF NATURE River Water Temperature exceeds 82°F VERIFY at least every two hours that river water is within limits 4.7.1.3.b.2 OP-DL.ZZ-0026 Severe Storm Warnings from the National Weather Service are forecast for Artificial Island At least every 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> DETERMINE river water level at the service water intake structure 4.7.3.b OP-DL.ZZ-0026 OFFGAS RADIATION MONITOR Increase (as indicated by the off-gas pre-treatment radiation monitors) of
> 50%, after factoring out increases due to changes in Thermal Power level, in nominal steady-state fission gas release from the primary coolant The radioactivity rate of noble gases from the Recombiner after-condenser discharge shall be determined to be within the limits of specification 3.11.2.7 by performing an isotopic analysis of a representative sample of gases taken near the discharge of the Main Condenser Air Ejector.
4.11.2.7.2.b CH-TI.ZZ-0012
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 65 of 75 EXHIBIT 4 SINGLE FAILURE CRITERIA FOR SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS FLOWCHART (Page 1 of 1)
One hundred percent redundancy of equipment that is related to Technical Specifications, Safety Related, or Important to Safety, does not necessitate the fulfillment of Single Failure Criteria. Any active failure of the remaining SSCs within the INOPERABLE SSCs system, which would render the system inoperable, indicates a failure of adherence to the Single Failure Criteria. Deviations from the Single Failure Criteria are allowed as long as compliance is re-established within the allowed outage time specified by Technical Specifications and Licensee Controlled Allowable Outage Times (Exhibit 2).
The following flow chart shall be used to determine the applicability of single failure criteria to INOPERABLE SSCs and the related Allowable Outage Times:
DETERMINE AOT FROM TECH SPECS OR LAOT RESTORE INOPERABLE SSC WITHIN AOT SINGLE ACTIVE FAILURE OF OTHER SYSTEM SSC RENDERS SYSTEM INOPERABLE YES SSC DEEMED INOPERABLE NO STOP
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 66 of 75 EXHIBIT 5 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PENETRATION MATRIX (Page 1 of 3)
The following matrixes identify all secondary containment penetrations.
Penetrations With Motor-Operated Valve Isolations ISOLATION VALVE - FUNCTION ISOLATION VALVE - FUNCTION AB-HV-3631A - A Main Steam Line EG-HV-2496B & D - TACS Rtn to B SACS AB-HV-3631B - B Main Steam Line EE-HV-4656 - TWCU to Filters AB-HV-3631C - C Main Steam Line EE-HV-4663 - Filters to TWCU AB-HV-3631D - D Main Steam Line FC-HV-F026 - RCIC Drain to Main Condenser AE-HV-F032A - A Feedwater Line FD-HV-F029 - HPCI Drain to Main Condenser AE-HV-F032B - B Feedwater Line GB-HV-9532 Chilled Water Return AE-HV-3625 - Long Path Recirc Rtn to Cndsr GB-HV-9532 Chilled Water Supply AN-HV-2600 - Demin Water to Rx Bldg.
GH-HV-5543 - RWCU Backwash Tank Vent AP-HV-2072 - Condo. Far to Rx Bldg.
GS-HV-5741A - H2 Sample Gas to A H2O2 AP-HV-2073 - Cond. Xfer to Rx Bldg.
GS-HV-5741B - H2 Sample Gas to B H2O2 BC-HV-4439 - RHR to RW GS-HV-11541 - Hard Torus Vent BF-HV-4005 - CRD Pump Suction HB-HV-5262 - Disch to Floor Drn Collector Tank BG-HV-F034 - RWCU to Condenser HB-HV-5275 - Disch to Equip. Drn Collector Tank BG-HV-F035 - RWCU to Radwaste HC-HV-5551 - RWCU Bkwsh Tank Disch to RW BG-HV-3980 - RWCU to Chem. Wst Tank KB-HV-7629 - Inst. Air to Rx Bldg.
BN-HV-2069 - Cond. Xfer to Refuel Floor KC-HV-3408M - Fire Water Isolation EA-HV-2346 - SSW from RACS KG-HV-7801 - Breathing Air to Rx Bldg.
EA-HV-2356A - SSW from A SACS KH-HV-5035 - Nitrogen Supply To Containment EA-HV-2356B - SSW from B SACS RC-SV-0732 - PASS Sample Line EA-HV-2357A - SSW A Yard Dump RC-SV-0733 - PASS Sample Line EA-HV-2357B - SSW B Yard Dump RC-SV-0730B - PASS Sample Line EC-HV-4678 - Filters to Fuel Pool System RC-SV-0731B - PASS Sample Line EC-HV-4676B - Fuel Pool Pumps to Filters RC-SV-0707B - PASS Sample Line ED-HV-2599 - RACS to Rx Bldg.
RC-SV-0728B - PASS Sample Line ED-HV-2598 - RACS From Rx Bldg.
RC-SV-8903B - PASS Sample Line EG-HV-2522A & C - A SACS Loop To TACS RC-SV-0645B - PASS Sample Line EG-HV-2522B & D - B SACS Loop To TACS RC-SV-0646B - PASS Sample Line EG-HV-2496A & C - TACS Rtn to A SACS RC-SV-0643B - PASS Sample Line
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 67 of 75 EXHIBIT 5 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PENETRATION MATRIX (Page 2 of 3)
Dampers Affecting Secondary Containment DAMPER FUNCTION GU-HD-9370A & B RBVS Supply Dampers GU-FD-9525A3 FRVS Exhaust Damper GU-HD-9414A & B RBVS Exhaust Dampers GU-FD-9525B3 FRVS Exhaust Damper PASS - FPD (M-76-1, A-5)
PASS Panel Ventilation Secondary Containment Penetrations With Manual Isolations VALVE FUNCTION 1-BC-V426 Fire Hose Fill to RHR 1-EA-V559 Fire Hose Fill to SSW 1-KC-V077 Fire Header to Rx Bldg.
1-KC-V038 Fire Header to Rx Bldg.
1-KC-V078 Fire Header to Rx Bldg.
1-KC-V068 Fire Header to Rx Bldg.
1-GS-V203 HTV Condensate Drain 0-RC-V015 SACS to PASS 0-RC-V014 PASS to SACS
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 68 of 75 EXHIBIT 5 SECONDARY CONTAINMENT PENETRATION MATRIX (Page 3 of 3)
Secondary Containment Penetrations Not Isolable Or Isolable Only With Multiple Components SYSTEM FUNCTION LINE ID P & ID AB Main Steam drains 1-AB-4-DBD-028 M-41-1, Sht.1 AP CST level inst.
1-AP-2-HCC-012 M-08-0, Sht. 1 AP HPCI/RCIC return 1-AP-10-HCC-004 M-08-0, Sht. 2 AP CST to ECCS/RCIC 1-AP-20-HCB-002 M-08-0, Sht. 2 EA A SSW supply EA-36-HXC-019 M-10-1, Sht. 2 EA B SSW supply EA-36-HXC-074 M-10-1, Sht. 2 EG A SACS return EG-20-HBC-104 M-12-1 EG A SACS supply EG-20-HBC-153 M-12-1 EG B SACS supply EG-20-HBC-154 M-12-1 EG B SACS return EG-20-HBC-105 M-12-1 GS H2O2 sample gas GS-1-CCB-055 M-57-1 GS H2O2 sample gas GS-1-CCB-056 M-57-1 GS H2O2 sample gas GS-1-CCB-057 M-57-1 GS H2O2 sample gas GS-1-CCB-058 M-57-1 GS H2O2 sample gas GS-1-CCB-059 M-57-1 GS H2O2 sample gas GS-1-CCB-060 M-57-1 GJ AK400 to SACS GJ-4-HBC-003 M-90-1, Sht. 1 GJ AK400 from SACS GJ-4-HBC-016 M-90-1, Sht. 1 GJ BK400 to SACS GJ-4-HBC-010 M-90-1, Sht. 2 GJ BK400 from SACS GJ-4-HBC-014 M-90-1, Sht. 2
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 69 of 75 EXHIBIT 6 STAGGERED TEST BASES POSITION (Page 1 of 1)
STAGGERED TEST BASIS is defined in T/S 1.46 to consist of:
A test schedule for n systems, subsystems, trains or other designated components obtained by dividing the specified test interval into n equal subintervals.
The testing of one system, subsystem, train or other designated component at the beginning of each subinterval.
When a surveillance requirement is not performed within its specified interval, T/S 4.0.2 allows up to a 25 percent extension of the specified surveillance interval. This permits an extension of the normal surveillance interval to facilitate surveillance scheduling and consideration of plant operating conditions that may not be suitable for conducting the surveillance; e.g., transient conditions or other ongoing surveillance or maintenance activities. It is not intended that this provision be used repeatedly as a convenience to extend surveillance intervals beyond that specified for surveillances that are not performed during refueling outages.
The T/S requirement to perform designated testing on a staggered test basis does not take precedence over system specific surveillance requirements to test all channels within the specified interval. The extension permitted by T/S 4.0.2 is based on the surveillance interval.
The staggered test basis subinterval deals with how the beginnings of the surveillance intervals for different subsystems are arranged.
Since T/S 4.0.2 is not intended to be used repeatedly, a surveillance test on a particular channel conducted subsequent to the application of T/S 4.0.2 is required to be performed in the next subinterval as previously scheduled. As an example, for a two channel system with a surveillance test required to be performed once per 28 days on a staggered test basis:
Day Channel 0
'A' completed (per normal schedule) 14
'B' completed (per normal schedule) 28
'A' scheduled, not completed, T/S 4.0.2 invoked 35
'A' completed (includes 25 percent extension per T/S 4.0.2) 42
'B' completed (per normal schedule) 56
'A' completed (return to normal schedule) 70
'B' completed (per normal schedule)
In this example, channel 'A' remains operable because the surveillance test performed on day 35 was completed within the specified surveillance interval (28 days) plus the 25 percent extension of the specified interval (7 days) allowed by T/S 4.0.2 from the last performance of the test for channel 'A.'
[70021204]
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 70 of 75 EXHIBIT 7 ACTIONS FOR MISSED SURVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES (Page 1 of 1)
PSEG is expected to perform a missed surveillance test at the first reasonable opportunity, taking into account appropriate considerations such as the impact on plant risk and accident analysis assumptions, unit conditions, planning, availability of personnel and time required to perform the surveillance.
The risk evaluation may use quantitative, qualitative, or blended methods. The degree of depth and rigor of the evaluation should be commensurate with the importance of the component.
Missed surveillances for important components should be analyzed quantitatively. If the results of the risk evaluation determine the risk increase is significant, this evaluation should be used to determine the safest course of action.
The relaxed time allowed to perform a missed surveillance does not result in a significant reduction in the margin of safety. As supported by the historical data, the likely outcome of any surveillance is verification that the LCO is met. Failure to perform a surveillance within the prescribed frequency does not cause equipment to become inoperable. The only effect of the additional time allowed to perform a missed surveillance on the margin of safety is the extension of the time until inoperable equipment is discovered to be inoperable by the missed surveillance.
However, given the rare occurrence of inoperable equipment, and the rare occurrence of a missed surveillance, a missed surveillance on inoperable equipment would be very unlikely.
This must be balanced against the real risk of manipulating the plant equipment or condition to perform the missed surveillance. In addition, parallel trains and alternate equipment are typically available to perform the safety function of the equipment not tested.
- 1.
When it is determined that entry into technical specification 4.0.3 is required due to a missed surveillance requirement, the following actions should be taken:
- 2.
A notification (SL-2) shall be initiated to document the missed surveillance.
- 3.
An Active Action Statement shall be entered under T/S 4.0.3, against the surveillance activity, with the Date/Time of Action Required designated to be the maximum delay approved by the AOM-Shift.
- 4.
An evaluation and assessment for the missed surveillance should be initiated IAW OP-AA-108-115-1001. This process is utilized only where the surveillance frequency is greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and the missed surveillance will not be completed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> from the time of the discovery of the missed surveillance. (Ref. T/S 4.0.3)
- 5.
For surveillances with a frequency of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or less, 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is the maximum delay period permitted.
- 6.
The delay period should be determined IAW OP-AA-108-115-1001. This period shall not be greater than the surveillance frequency period.
- 7.
The SM should review all data on the assessments and provide a recommendation to the AOM-Shift for the maximum permissible delay to perform the surveillance.
- 8.
The evaluation and assessments for approving a delay of the surveillance interval is expected to occur within one day. This timeline may be relaxed or accelerated commensurate with the safety significance of the SSC function affected.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 71 of 75 EXHIBIT 8 Actions For Implementation of Technical Specification 3.0.4.b (Page 1 of 1)
- 1.
Technical Specification LCO 3.0.4.b and the associated bases provides allowances to place the unit in an OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified condition when the requirements of a Tech Spec LCO requiring a plant shutdown are not met, provided certain actions are taken to assess the risk associated with the inoperable equipment. This allowance should be taken only in cases of unanticipated inoperability. Certain systems (HPCI, RCIC, and EDG's) are exempted from LCO 3.0.4.b allowances. Hope Creek implements these requirements as follows:
1.1 Write a notification detailing the inoperable equipment, the cause of the inoperability, the estimated duration of the inoperability, the OPCON change(s) desired and all other currently inoperable Tech Spec equipment. This notification should reference any open notifications or work orders currently open to correct the inoperability of the system/component for which 3.0.4.b is being implemented.
1.2 Direct Outage Management to implement the requirements of OU-AA-103 Shutdown Safety Approval of the condition.
1.3 Direct Work Management to implement the requirements of WC-AA-101 for approval of the Maintenance efforts required to return the equipment to an operable condition.
1.4 Direct Engineering to initiate a Risk Assessment IAW ER-AA-600-1042 to assess overall plant risk associated with making the mode change with inoperable equipment.
1.5 Direct Engineering to create an NUCR Order from the above notification with an operation in which to document the results of the above risk assessment, the acceptability of entering the mode or other specified condition, the establishment of any appropriate risk management actions (i.e. protected equipment, compensatory measures, etc), and the reasonable probability of completing restoration of the inoperable equipment within the applicable Tech Spec AOT. The SM/CRS final confirms this operation indicating acceptance of the risk assessment. This documentation does not have to be completed prior to making the desired mode change.
1.6 SM/CRS reviews the above risk assessment, ensures that any recommended risk management actions are assessed and implemented, documents this review in the Control Room Narrative Log, and places the unit in the desired OPERATIONAL CONDITION or other specified condition IAW with the applicable Integrated Operating Procedure.
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 72 of 75 FORM 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT LOG (Page 1 of 4) 1.0 ACTION STATEMENT LOG SHEET LCO INDEX NUMBER:
LCO STATUS (ACTIVE/TRACKING):
TECH SPEC NUMBER:
DATE/TIME ENTERED:
APPLICABILITY:
DATE/TIME ACTION REQUIRED:
OTHER APPLICABLE T/S:
EQUIPMENT:
SUMMARY
DESCRIPTION (Include Summary of Actions Required)
RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT NOTIFICATION(S)
SPECIAL REPORT REQUIRED YES NO REPORT INITIATION DUE DATE _____________
NOTIFICATIONS FOR COMPENSATORY ACTIONS OR SURVEILLANCES
- NAME of DEPARTMENT and PERSON NOTIFIED NOTIFICATION (DATE/TIME)
ENTRY / EXIT NAME of PERSON MAKING NOTIFICATION NOTIF#
(If applicable)
IF entry into an Action Statement or failure to meet an Action Statement time limitation requires the submittal of a special report to the NRC, THEN:
ENSURE the responsible department is notified of the reporting requirements, AND, NOTIFY the SOS or other Operations Management within one hour, AND, ENSURE the Licensing Department is notified of the reporting requirements, AND, INITIATE a Notification IAW LS-AA-120, Notification Process.
REDUNDANT EQUIPMENT OPERABLE (Y/N) :
APPROVAL TO REMOVE FROM SERVICE, VERIFICATION OF REDUNDANT EQUIPMENT CONCURRENCE AUT HORIZATION SRO/STA (print name)
SM/CRS (print name)
SRO/STA (signature)
DATE/TIME SM/CRS (signature)
DATE/TIME
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 73 of 75 FORM 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT LOG (Page 2 of 4) 2.0 ORDER AND WCD ADDENDUM DR / NOTF /
ORDER WCD NUMBER DESCRIPTION SYSTEM TASK/
TYPE RESP.
DEPT/
GROUP STATUS (Continue on Page 3)
RETURN TO SERVICE (SM/CRS INITIAL OR N/A ALL BOXES)
TAGS RELEASED, SYSTEM/EQUIPMENT FILLED & VENTED, RESTORED FOR OPERATION SURVEILLANCE RETESTS & SPECIAL TEST/ACTIONS COMPLETE RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENTS - INFORMED DCP TURNOVER CHECKLIST COMPLETED ACTION STATEMENT LOG INDEX UPDATED VERIFICATION OF OPERABILITY REQUIREMENTS AND SYSTEM RESTORATION CONCURRENCE AUTH ORIZATION SRO/STA (print name)
SM/CRS (print name)
SRO/STA (signature)
DATE/TIME SM/CRS (signature)
DATE/TIME
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 74 of 75 FORM 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT LOG (Page 3 of 4) 2.0 ORDER AND WCD ADDENDUM (Continued)
INDEX NUMBER ___________
Page Number ___ of ____
DR / NOTF /
ORDER WCD NUMBER DESCRIPTION SYSTEM TASK/
TYPE RESP.
DEPT/
GROUP STATUS
OP-HC-108-115-1001 Revision 10 Page 75 of 75 FORM 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENT LOG SHEET (Page 4 of 4) 3.0 DES CRIPTION ADDENDUM INDEX NUMBER __________
Page Number ___ of ____