ML082810364

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML082810364
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/02/2008
From:
Operations Branch I
To:
Hansell S
Shared Package
ML073040307 List:
References
Download: ML082810364 (14)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2

d.
e.

Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

kh p-,*

Facility: CCNPP

  • .q LA Date of Examination:

6/13/2008 Item Task

1.
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropri:

w R

b. Assess whether the outline was systemati I

Section D.l of ES-401 and whether all KIA T

T

c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizi E

N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselc
2.

S and major transients.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, I

and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants audit test(@, and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

I M

U L

A T

c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative crileria specified on Form 13-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
  1. I
3.

W I

T

a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits speufied on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applitants audit test@)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-powor, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.

I n

. I

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations

c. Determine if there are enough different outlilies to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

e 4

$1 G

1 c. Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

jp//l*l q-R A

L

a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supervisor Note:
  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines

ICCNPP 2008 NRC EXAMpl ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of(,- I > - du as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination CCNPP - 2008 I

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 611 3-6/20 of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

as of the date

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 6/13-6/20.

From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE ES-201, Page 26 of 27

CCNPP 2008 ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 611 3 - 6/18 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE C R U 5Rc / L / L 0

-2 5d

-SAw&%r G 5 0 cect VK7-aUCPf2

-6 c

3 3

cT-4 4

12.
13.
14.
15.

NOTES:

ES-201, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 K

Facility: G//&f Date of Examination: h/fh/bf Operatin[ 'est N u m b p '

1. General Criteria
a.

The operating test conforms with the previou!;ly approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.

b.

C.

d.
e.
2. Walk-Through Criteria
a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associatsd procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific perform 3nce criteria that include:

detailed expected actions with exa,:t criteria and nomenclature system response and other examirier cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Ensure that any changes from the previously E pproved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caiised the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g.. item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

b.
3. Sirnulatcir Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Date a

Author

b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

c.
d.

NRC Supervisor NRC Chief Examiner (#) : D K U ; d s(uc NOTE:

The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

Independent NRC reviewer initial i t

e m

s 3

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility C,/ued 4% / d ~

Date of Exam 'v%<cario Numbers //

13 Operating Test No I

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

3.

Each event description consists of the malfunction(s) that are entered to ini the symptomslcues that will be visible tc the expected operator actions (by shift 1 the event termination point (if applicabl without a credible preceding incident such as The events are valid with regard to physics 2 Sequencing and timing of events is reasonal complete evaluation results commensurate \\i

7.

If time compression techniques are used, thc Operators have sufficient time to cany out e:

Cues are given.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

'The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from to ensure that functional fidelity is maintaine Every operator will be evaluated using at les All other scenarios have been altered in acc All individual operator competencies can be (submit the form along with the simulator so Each applicant will be significantly involved specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the fori

a.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position (I

I I

I I

3.

Abnormal events (2-4)

4.

Major transients (1-2)

5.

EOPs enteredhquiring substantive actions

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive ac

7.

Critical tasks (2-3)

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 f -

0 Facility t/& /$z Date of Exa%Y Sfenario Numbers 4 I

Operating Test No Zdb I

QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e without a credible preceding incident such a:

The events are valid with regard to physics a Sequencing and timing of events is reasonal If time compression techniques are used, the Operators have sufficient time to carry out e)

Cues are given.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

5.
6.
7.
a.

ES-301, Page 25 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Inst,mt SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component ( K ) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one IIC malfunction can be credited toward the two IIC malfunctions required for the ATC position.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a l-for-I basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the riqht-hand columns.

2.
3.

ES-~CII, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility:

Date of Exalmination:

Operating Test No.:

II R O W ' Et' SRO-I 0 SRO-U 0 t

r i-Notes:

(1)

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

CEt' -

5 2

AR -

3 3 I Instructions:

Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicabl's competency for every applicant.

I

/

I I

I I

I I

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: CCPP Units 1 and 2 Date of Exam: 06/25/08 Exam Level: RO S R O a I Initial 1

Questions and answers are technically accut

2.
a.

NRC WAS are referenced for all qt

b.

Facility learning objectives are ref 3

SRO questions are appropriate in accordanc

4.

The sampling process was rando were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing

5.

Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or a

e examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) i

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

1 3 1 2 1 7 1 12 45111

~

-~

7.

Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA (b$

exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly the actual RO I SRO question distribution@) at right.

selected WAS support the higher cognitive levels. enter 30 l 3 45 22 I

I

a.

Referenceslhandouts provided do not give ab or aid in the elimination of distractors.

Question content conforms with specific KIA !j examination outline and is appropriate for the deviations are justified.

Question psychometric quality and format me The exam contains the required number of or the total is correct and agrees with the value

9.
10.
11.
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor Printed Name I Siature /A Date Note:

The facility reviewers initialslsignature are tiot applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

  1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: CALUCRT LLI Fe5 Date o

4.
5.

Grading for all borderline cases (80 +2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-on All other failing examinations check, are justified

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems. evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NameEignature Date U

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

Ni.4 c NRC Chief Examiner (*) avid SlL'C /&/M

ES-403 Written IExaminat i on Grading Form ES-403-1 1

Quality Checklist Faci1ity:LC-d p

Date of Exam: 6 I;xs Exam Level: R O w S R O @ I I

I Initials Date

a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)

~

W c

Z

~

o

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) 3 E
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*)

The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

O U E ~ N S l a THROUGH 25(

00)ITINUE OR THE OTHER B ; V m Y Y ( ~ 7 Y I ( I W u R K *. ( T s E % 3 v a Mi Oen PC7 869 5 4 3 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML082810364&oldid=5324990"