ML072960127
| ML072960127 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 07/17/2007 |
| From: | Florida Power & Light Energy Seabrook |
| To: | NRC Region 1 |
| Caruso J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML062050109 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-443/07-301 | |
| Download: ML072960127 (31) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1
- acility:
S&
y3Ao.K Date of Examination: 7 /4 -&
)eveloped by: Written -Facility @ NRC 9
/ I Operating - Facility,@
NRC [7
- 2.
- 3.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
Target Date'
-180
-120
-120
-120 1-901
(-75)
-30
-14
-14
-14
-7
-7
-7
-7 Task Description (Reference)
Examiner's I
Initials Chief I
- 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a and b)
- 4.
[5.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)
Reference material due (C.l.e; C.3.c; Attachment 211
- 6.
Intearated examination outline(s) due. includina Forms ES-201-2.S-201-3.
I II
~,,
~
ES-jOlIi, ES301-2, ES-301.5, ES-D-l's~ES-401-1/2, ES40i-3. and ES-4014. as applicable (C.7.e and f: C.3.d)
(7. Examination outline(?.)
reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))
- 8.
ProDosed examinations fincludino written. walk-throuoh JPMs. and I
- 1 II scenarios. as applicablej. suppo&ng documentation Gncludmg Forms ES-301-3. ES-301-4. ES-301.5, ES-301-6. and ES-401-6. and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.l e. f. q and h. C 3 d)
I h 11 9
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C 1 I, C 2 g, ES-202)
- 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.9 Y
- 12.
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)
Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.J: C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
$4.
14: Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if >IO) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters Sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202. C.2.e; ES-204)
- 15. Proctonnglwitten exam administration guidelines reviewed wlth facility licensee (C.3 k)
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distrrboted to NRC examlners (C.3.i)
I
- Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the exarninakbn date identified in the corporale notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201, Page 24 of 27
Item
- 1.
W R
I T
T E
N 1
Task Description a
b' c#
- a. Verify that the outline(s) fit@) the appropriate model, in accordance with
. b. A~~~~~ whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.I of ~ ~ - 4 0 1 and whether all KIA categories are aPPrOPrlatelY sampled.
4 2,
S I
M U
L A
T 0
R
- 3.
W I
T whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
- d. A~~~~~ whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
a, using F~~~ ES-301-5, of and major transients.
that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number evolutions, instrument and component failures. technical SPeclficatlons,
- b. A~~~~~ whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composltlon and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modifled scenario, that no Scenarios are subsequent days.
=. T~ the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) wit? the qualptive and quantitative criteria specifled on Form ES-301-4 and described In Appendix D.
duplicated from the applicants=
audit test@), and that scenarios will not be repeated on v
- a. veriw that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s)
(2) distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (3) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified On (5) the (6) criteria on the form.
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form the required number of control room and in-Plant tasks the form.
of alternate path, low-power. emergency. and RCAtasks meet the
- b. verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
W I
T (cont.)
- 4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
I I
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55,41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5 I
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
h$#L ret ENL P P
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Date
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column Ace; chief examiner concurrence required.
2
01 m
\\
PI m
a' w
m a
ATACHMENT 3 Form ES-2103, Examination Security Agreement r-m..
!4 w
Page 9 of 9
ES-301, Rev. 9 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 I Facility:
<&dnmD/L-Date of Examination: ~ / Y J o ~
Operatin I
- 1. General Criteria II The operat ng test conforms w th tne previous y appmveo OLtline: cnanges are consistent wth samp ng reqL rements (e g, 10 CFR 55 45, operationa Importance. safety function a str out on)
~ 0.
I Tnere $6 no day-to-day repetit.on between tnis and other operat ng tests to be adm nistered omng th s examinat on.
C.
Tne operat ng tesl shall not dLplicate tems from me applicants = aLdit tesl(s) (see SectonD.1 a )
0 Overlap +itn the wnrten exam nation and oerween differell parts of the operating tesl $5 wth n acceolab e limits.
- e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria
- a.
initial conditions
~ $.
! 5.
~ 5.
B.
B.
B.
- 8.
B.
B.
- b.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initiating cues references and tools. including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use. repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
'est Number:
Initials Date
- a.
Author &,,
M.
- b.
Facility Reviewer(^)
- / f i r t,)fc,
- c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#) 3;. &,
- d.
NRC Supervisor
/&&#d I NOTE:
The facilitv siqnature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
~
- 1.
The nmal wndit'ons are rea SI c, in thal some eqdlpment andlor mstrurneniat on may be OJI Tne scenanos cons st mostly of related evenls of service, bLt I ooes not cJe me operators into expected events.
2
- 3.
Eacn event description consists of Facility:
?&&%%QbIL Date of Exam' Scenario Numbers:A I 4 in Operating Test No.:
- A QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES c
12 Each applicant will De s gn ficantly nvo vea In Ine m nimLm ndmber of trans en15 and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (sJbm.1 the form H In me SlmL alor scenanos]
nilials F
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 ES-301, Rev. 9 QUALITATIVE AlTRIBUTES Initials a
b' c#
4 No mare than one non-mecnan stic fa lure (e g, pipe DreAK) s incorporated into the scenano wlnoJ a credib e precea ng nc dent sdch as a seismic event
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentation may be Out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
rc-?
7 1
2 3
Scenario 1 (A)
Scenario 2 (B)
Scenario 4 (D)
CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301, Rev. 9 4
CREW POSITION SRO-I1 Andrew Caramihalis Date of Exam:
719-7/12/07 Operating Test No.:
Scenarios B
S O
R P
O I
- v#1 I
iv#l 1
i d 2
.v#3 iw iv#5 1
iv#5 0
0 RO-I RO-U A
B T
O C
P E
V E
N T
T Y
P E
i x VOR I/C MAJ TS M
I N
I M
U
RO SRO-I SRO-U RO SRO-I SRO-U RO SRO-l SRO-U lnstructior
- 1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimu1 requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
?.
I.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 3
SRO-12 Edward Lyons acilitv: Seabrook Date of Exam:
7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No.:
4 A
P P
L I
C A
N T
.O RO-I
,RO-U B
S O
R P
O 2
iv#l iv#5 1
Fv#l 1
- v#4 1
EM7 0
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E u(
4OR IC MAJ rs 1
Scenario 1 (A)
CREW POSITION 2
Scenario 4 (D)
- REW POSITION A
T C -
2 Ev#
1 Ev#
2 -
1 Ev#
1 -
4 Ev#
2 EV#
3 Ev#
4 Ev#
5 -
1 Ev#
5 -
0 Scenarios Scenario 2 (8)
- REW t POSITION CREW POSITION M
I N
I M
U M(^)
I
4 2
0 1
1 1
4 2 2
1 2
2
)
!O-I
!O-u
)
- 0-I
- o-u
)
- o-I
- o-u tructioi Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-I event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component ( K ) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-I basis Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E X
OR AAJ S
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 2
Scenario 2 (6)
A P
P L
I C
A N
T 3
to4 to-u 3
4 Scenario 4 (D)
CREW POSITION SRO-13 Ed Pigott acility: Seabrook Date of Exam:
7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No.:
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION Scenarios 2
2 Ev#l E d 5 1
1 Ev#l 1
4 E*
1 2
3 7
3 3
1 Scenario 1 (A:
B S
A O
R T
P O
C Ev#l Ev#2 Ev#l EM2 Ev#3 E
M EM5 Ev#4 EM5 Ev#l E d 2 CREV POSIT11 A
B S
A B
O R
T O
P O
C P
3 T
C -
3 Ev#l E*
EM5 -
1 Ev#l -
3 EM3 E*
1 Ev#5 -
0 S
A R
T o
c M
I N
I M
U M(')
I I
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATCY and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (IC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a I-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
e S
A R
T o
c ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 2
Ev#
1 Ev#
2 1
Ev#
1 4
Ev#
2 E*
3 E*
4 Ev#
5 1
Ev#
5 0
cility: I -
A P
P L
I C
A N
T 3
10-1 io-u SRO-14 Eric Mallett Date of Exam:
719-7/12\\07 Operating Test No.:
)rook E
V E
N T
T Y
P E
=
X OR C
AAJ
-S 1
Scenario 1 (A)
CREW POSlTlC 2
Scenario 4 (D)
- REW POSITION Scenarios 3
Scenario 2 (B)
- REW POSITION 4
- REW POSITION M
I N
I M
U M(")
I I
I 1
1 1
4 4
2 2
0 2
.O RO-I RO-U
.O RO-I RO-U 0
RO-I RO-U istructions:
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the '"at-the-controls (ATC)"
and 'balanceaf-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 SRO-15 Bonnie Bryant Date of Exam:
7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No,:
acilitv: Seabrook
~
A P
P L
I C
A N
T 3
304 io-u 1
2 Scenario 1 (A)
Scenario 2 (6)
I CREW I CREW POSITIOP Scenarios Scenario 4 (D)
S A
R T
o c
2 Ev#l Ev#2 1
Ev#l 4
E N 2 Ev#3 E M EN5 2
Ev #4 Ev#5 3
E d 1 B
S A
B O
R T
O P
O C
P I
M I
N I
M U
M U I
R B
3 0 jR0-I jRO-U 10 jR0-I SRO-U 3 0 SRO-I SRO-U n s t ru c t i o n s :
I.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. r)
Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-I basis, Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
- 2.
- 1.
1 Scenario 1 (A)
CREW ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 2
3 4
Scenario 4 (D)
Scenario 2 (B)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITIOh RO John Burnett acility: Seabrook Date of Exam:
719-7/12/07 Operatinq Test No.:
A B
T O
C P
A P
P L
I C
A N
T
- 0 RO-I RO-U 1
1 2
1 2 2 E
V E
N T
T Y
P E
u(
U 1
0 4
2
.]OR C
AAJ S
Scenarios POSITION 1
I I
M I
N I
M U
M(*)
I
1 1
2 1
1 1
4 2
2 1
2 2
1 1
4 2
2 1
2 2
1 0
4 2
2 2
1 0
1 0
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"
and "balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (') Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimui requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
I
1 Scenario 1 (A)
CREW POSITION ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 2
3 4
Scenario 2 (B)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION acility: !
A P
P L
I C
A N
T 0
RO-I RO-U SRO-U1 Shawn Miller abrook Date of Exam: 7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No :
E l
Scenarios M
I N
I M
U M(')
I
U
- 0 RO-I RO-U
- 0 RO-I RO-U
- 0 RO-I RO-U istructions:
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type: TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. () Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
n
- ility: Seabrook -
E Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 ES-301, Rev. 9 Date of Exam:
7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No.:
Scenarios A
P P
L I
C A
N T
3 10-1
?O-u 1
jcenario 1 (A) 2 3
Scenario 2 (B)
V E
N T
T Y
P E
u(
.]OR
/C MAJ TS CREW POSITION S
A B
I CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S I i ( ::
I R
T 3
c 3
2 Ev#l E d 5 1
Ev#l 4
E d 2 Ev#3 Ev#4 E d 6 2
Ev#5 Ev#7 2
E d 2 Ev#3 x
M I
N I
M U
M(')
I I
R B
RO SRO-l SRO-U 30 SRO-I SRO-U 10 jR0-I SRO-U nstructiol I.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATC)"
and '"balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions; Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-1 basis Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
E V
E N
T T
Y P
E X
3R d
ES-301, Rev. 9 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 S
A R
T o
c A
P P
L I
C A
N T
0 RO-I RO-U SRO-U3 Mark Hansen Date of Exam:
7/9-7/12/07 Operating Test No.:
'acilitv: Seabrook Scenarios 1
Scenario 1 (A)
CREW POSITION 2
3 4
Scenario 2 (6)
CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION M
I N
I M
U M(')
I
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the 'at-the-controls (ATCy' and '"balance-of-plant (BOP)" positions: Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (UC) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (+) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1-for-I basis.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicanfs competence count toward the minimun requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 John Burnett RO SCENARIO
- acility:Seabrook Station Date of Examination:7/10/7 Operating Test No.:
APPLICANTS Andy Edward Edward Caramihalis Lyons Pigott SRO-I SRO-I SRO-I SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO Competencies 4
- 2.
3, 4,
5 2,
3, 4,
5 NI A
- 2.
3,
- 4.
5 2,
3,
- 4.
5
- 1.
2 nterpretIDiagnose Events and Conditions
- omply With and Jse Procedures (1 )
lperate Control 3oards (2) 2ommunicate and Interact lemonstrate Supervisory Ibility (3) 2omply With and Jse Tech. Specs. (3) dotes:
- 1)
- 2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
- 3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
Instructions:
Check the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
~
~
~~~
Faci1ity:Seabrook Station batebf Examination:~lO/7 Operating Test No11
~
~~
Competencies I nterpretl Diagnose Events and Conditions Comply With and Use Procedures (1)
Operate Control Boards (2)
Communicate and Interact Demonstrate Supervisory 4bility (3)
Comply With and Use Tech. Specs. (3)
I APPLICANTS Eric Mallett
- 1)
Bonnie 11 Shawn Miller 1) Sean Doody 11 1
2.3.
4,5 2.3, 4.5 NIA -
2.3.
4.5 2.3.
4.5 2.3.
4 -
Votes:
- I)
- 2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
- 3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO Instructions:
Check the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-301, Rev. 9 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
~
~
~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Faci1ity:Seabrook Station Date of Exarnination:7/10/7 Operating Test No.:
SCE 4
1 2
4RIO 5
3 4
1 SCENAR 1
2 3
Notes:
(1)
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO, Instructions:
Check the applicantslicense type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
~
~
ES-401, Rev. 9 Written Examination st Form FS-401-6 I.
- 2.
- a.
NRC K/As ere referenced for all questions.
Questions and answera are technlceily accurate and applicable to the facility.
- b.
Facility learnlng obJeeUves are referenced as available.
SRO questions are aDpropriate In accordanca with SecUon D.2.d of ES-401
- 3.
- 4.
questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program a c e ).
- 5.
Question dupllcatlon from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as Indicated below (check the Item that applies) end appears appropriate:
X t h e audlt exam was systematically and randomly developed, or the audlt exam wes completed before the licenee exam was started, M
-the examinations were developed independently. or X t h e licensee certifies that there is no duplication. or
-other (explain)
The sampling proceas was random and syatematlc (if more than 4 RO or 2 SRO
- 6.
Bank use meeta limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SROonly questJon distributlon(s) at right 3% p-I I
I
- 7.
Between SO and 60 percent of the questions Memory CIA on the RO exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected KlAa support the higher cognitive levels; enter the actual RO I SRO question distribution(s) at right B/. q x o I
I
- 8.
or eM in th elimlnation of distractom.
- 9.
approved examination outline and Is appropriate for the tier to whlch they are assigned; davlatlons are lusUHed.
Referencedhandouta provided do not give away answera Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously IO.
- 11.
the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet Question psychometric quality end format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix E.
The exam contains the required number of onspoint, multiple choice items;
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (7
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor
ll Note:
- The facility reviewer-s initlaidsignature are not applicable for NRCdeveioped examinations.
I I
indenendent NRC reviewer inltlal items in Column Ace: chief examiner concurrence rewired.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:
Date of Exam:
Exam Level: ROWSROQ
- a. Grader
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
ES-403, Page 5 of 5