ML070120384

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

JAFNPP - SEIS Web Reference - Common Reed
ML070120384
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/26/2006
From:
US Dept of Interior, National Park Service
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
jmm7
References
Download: ML070120384 (5)


Text

PCA Alien Plant Working Group - Common Reed (Phragmites australis)

.Page I of 5 p

Plant Conservation Alliance's Alien Plant Working Group LEAST WANTED Common PReed FACT SHEET INKS r in ifpIV I 1U0 auOt a0110 IComplete List Grass family (Poaceae)

ElAquatics Download PDF version formatted for print (355 KB)

ElHerbs HIShrubs EITrees NATIVE RANGE ElVines Eurasia I

DESCRIPTION Common reed, or Phragmites, is a tall, perennial grass that can grow to over 15 feet in height. In North Americ.

both native phragmites (Phragmites australis ssp.

americanus Saltonstall, P.M. Peterson & Soreng) and S0f

'.~

introduced subspecies are found. Introduced PhragmitE forms dense stands which include both live stems and standing dead stems from previous year's growth.

their widest point. Flowers form bushy panicles in late July and August and are usually purple or golden in col As seeds mature, the panicles begin to look "fluffy" due the hairs on the seeds and they take on a grey sheen.

Below ground, Phragmites forms a dense network of roots and rhizomes which can go down several feet in depth. The plant spreads horizontally by sending out rhizome runners which can grow 10 or more feet in a single growing season if conditions are optimal.

J Please see the table below for information on distinguishing betweeen native and introduced Phragmites.

ECOLOGICAL THREAT Once introduced Phragmites invades a site it quickly ce

-* ~take over a marsh community, crowding out native plar ch -

r 5t, and increasing fire potential. Its high biomass blocks ligl to other plants and occupies all the growing space belowground so plant communities can turn into a Phragmites monoculture very quickly. Phragmites can spread both by seed dispersal and by vegetative spread via fragments of rhizomes that break off and are transported elsewhere. New populations of the introduced type may appear sparse for the first few years of growth but due to the plant's rapid growth rate, they will typically form a pure stand that chokes out other vegetation very quickly.

DISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES Phragmites occurs throughout the lower 48 states and southern Canada. It has been report(

http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/phaul.htm 12/26/2006

PCA Alien Plant Working Group - Common Reed (Phragmites australis)

Page 2 of 5 to be invasive in natural areas in 18 states including Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvani Tennessee, Virginia, Vermont, and Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia.

HABITAT IN THE UNITED STATES Tidal and nontidal brackish and freshwater marshes, river edges, shores of lakes and ponds, roadsides, disturbed areas.

BACKGROUND Preserved remains of native Phragmites that are 40,000 years old have been found in the southwest indicating that it is a part of the native flora of that region. In coastal areas, preserved rhizome fragments dating back 3000-4000 years have also been found in salt marsh sediments indicating that it is also native I these habitats. Native American uses of Phragmites include use of stems for arrow shafts, musical instruments, ceremonial objects, cigarettes, and both leaves and stems for constructing mats.

Introduced Phragmites is thought to have arrived in North America accidentally, most likely in ballast materi in the late 18th or early 19th centuries. It established itself along the Atlantic coast and over the course of tl 20th century, spread across the continent. In Europe Phragmites is grown commercially and is used for thatching, fodder for livestock, and cellulose production. It is also declining in parts of Europe which has bef of concern to natural resource managers there. Here in the United States it is not used for many purposes.

BIOLOGY & SPREAD While each Phragmites plant may produce thousands of seeds annually, seed viability is typically low although there appears to be a great deal of interannual variation in fecundity. Dispersal to new sites is typically by seed except along rivers and shorelines where fragments of rhizomes may be washed down to new sites where they can establish. Along roadsides, rhizomes fragments may also be transported by heav machinery between sites. At this time, there is no evidence for hybrid native/introduced populations occurrir in the field.

MANAGEMENT OPTIONS Areas with large, established, populations of Phragmites are best restored using herbicides. Other options include mowing and prescribed burning.

Biological At this time no means of biological control are available in the United States for treating Phragmites infestations.

Chemical Glyphosate-based herbicides (e.g., Rodeo) are the most effective control method for established populations. If a population can be controlled soon after it has established chances of success are much higher because the below-ground rhizome network will not be as extensive. Herbicides are best applied in late summer/early fall after the plant has flowered either as a cut stump treatment or as a foliar spray. It is often necessary to do repeated treatments for several years to prevent any surviving rhizomes from resprouting. When applying herbicides in or around water or wetlands, be sure to use products labeled for that purpose to avoid harm to aquatic organisms.

Fire Prescribed burning after the plant has flowered, either alone or in combination with herbicide treatment, ma also be effective. Burning after herbicide treatment also reduces standing dead stem and litter biomass whi, may help to encourage germination of native plants in the following growing season. Plants should not be burned in the spring or summer before flowering as this may stimulate growth.

http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/phaul.htm 12/26/2006

PCA Alien Plant Working Group - Common Reed (Phragmites australis)

Page 3 of 5 Mechanical This type of control (e.g., repeated mowing) may be effective at slowing the spread of established stands bi is unlikely to kill the plant. Excavation of sediments may also be effective at control but if small fragments o1 root are left in the soil, they may lead to reestablishment.

USE PESTICIDES WISELY: ALWAYS READ THE ENTIRE PESTICIDE LABEL CAREFULLY, FOLLOW ALL MIXING AND APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS AND WEAR ALL RECOMMENDED PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR AND CLOTHING.

CONTACT YOUR STATE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL PESTICIDE USE REQUIREMENTS, RESTRICTIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS.

NOTICE: MENTION OF PESTICIDE PRODUCTS ON THIS WEB SITE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE ENDORSEMENT OF ANY MATERIAL.

CONTACTS For more information on identification and control of Phragmites, contact:

  • Dr. Kristin Saltonstall; Adjunct Research Scientist; Horn Point Laboratory; University of Maryland Cen for Environmental Science; ksalton at hpl.umces.edu; Tel: (914) 526-2498 SUGGESTED ALTERNATIVE PLANTS Native plant species that are adapted to local conditions should be used in restoration projects and as a substitute for Phragmites erosion control practices.

How to Distinguish Native and Introduced Phragmites plants:

It can be difficult to definitively distinguish native from introduced Phragmites plants without genetic testing due to the plasticity of the species and its ability to adapt to a wide range of conditions. However, a number morphological characteristics have now been identified that can be used to determine a population's type.

These characters can be subtle (e.g. color variation) and subjective making positive identification difficult.

Given this, an assignment of native or introduced status to a population should not be made unless several characters clearly match the patterns shown in table 1.

Table 1: Morphological characters useful in distinguishing Native and Introduced Phragmites populations.*

CHARACTER NATIVE INTRODUCED Photo Ligule width**

1.0-1.7 mm 0.4-0.9 mm Lowe lume length 3.0-6.5 mm 2.5-5.0 mm Uper lumelength 5.5-11.0 mm 4.5-7.5 mm Adherence of leaf sheaths**

Loose - both leaves and leaf sheaths are usually dropped as the plant senesces Tight - leaves may drop off but leaf sheaths typically adhere tightly to dead stems http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/phau l.htm 12/26/2006

PCA Alien Plant Working Group - Common Reed (Phragmites australis)

Page 4 of 5 I

Stem color (look under the leaf sheaths, Summer - green to maroon, Summer - typically all green with yellowish node, especially in places where the stem is may have maroon color at the although some lower nodes may have maroon exposed to sunli ht) nodes only color Winter - yellow to brown Winter - yellow Stem spots Small round fungal spots MAY Extremely rare. Patches of black filamentous fun(

be present in late summer and may be seen on dead stems Stem density May occur as a monoculture, Typically grows as a monoculture, young newly often co-occurs with other plant established populations and those in areas of hig species salinity may be less dense Leaf color Yellow-green - usually lighter Blue-green in most habitats but may be yellow-than introduced green in brackish habitats Habitat Undisturbed sites Highly disturbed to undisturbed sites, dominates MidAtlantic - fresh to oligohaline brackish marshes along the Atlantic coast, tidal marshes common along roadsides throughout the U.S.

Midwest - fens, marshes

  • This table should not be used to distinguish between Phragmites populations along the Gulf Coast where another type of Phragmites, the Gulf Coast type, which looks similar to introduced Phragmites, is also found.
    • Most reliable characters distinguishing native from introduced Phragmites.

OTHER LINKS

" Photos at invasive. org

" Invasive Plant Atlas of New England

  • PDF file of a powerpoint on distinguishing between native & invasive Phragmites AUTHOR Dr. Kristin Saltonstall, Adjunct Research Scientist, Horn Point Laboratory University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomon, MD EDITOR Jil M. Swearingen, National Park Service, Center for Urban Ecology, Washington DC PHOTOGRAPHS http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/phaul.htm 12/26/2006

PCA Alien Plant Working Group - Common Reed (Phragmites australis)

Page 5 of 5 Jil M. Swearingen, National Park Service, Center for Urban Ecology, Washington DC Dr. Kristin Saltonstall, Adjunct Research Scientist, Horn Point Laboratory University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomon MD R.E. Meadows REFERENCES Chambers, R.M., L.A. Meyerson, and K. Saltonstall. 1999. Expansion of Phragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America. Aquatic Botany 64: 261-273.

Marks, M., B. Lapin, et al. 1994. Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitorini Natural Areas Journal 14: 285-294.

Meyerson, L.A., K. Saltonstall, L. Windham, E. Kiviat, and S. Findlay. 2000. A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetlands Ecology and Management 8: 89-103.

Norris, L., J. E. Perry, and K.J. Havens. 2002. A summary of methods for controlling Phragmites australis.

Virginia Institute of marine Science Wetlands Program Technical Report No. 02-2.

Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion of a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, ii North America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99(4): 2445-2449.

Saltonstall, K. 2003. Microsatellite variation within and among North American lineages of Phragmites australis. Molecular Ecology 12(7): 1689-1702.

Saltonstall, K. 2003. Genetic variation among North American populations of Phragmites australis:

implications for management. Estuaries 26(2B):445-452.

Saltonstall, K. 2003. A rapid method for identifying the origin of North American Phragmites populations usi RFLP analysis. Wetlands 23(4) 1043-1047.

Saltonstall, K., P.M. Peterson, and R. Soreng. 2004. Recognition of Phragmites australis subsp. americanu (Poaceae: Arundinoideae) in North America: evidence from morphological and genetic analyses. Sida.

Swearingen, J. 2005. Alien Plant Invaders of Natural Areas. Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plant Workir Group. http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/list/a.htm U.S.Department of Agriculture. 2005. Natural Resources Conservation Service Plants Database.

http://plants.usda.gov/

Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plant Working Group.

EAQ1TSHEET LISU I APWG HOME PAGE Comments, suggestions, and questions about the website should be directed to the webmaster.

http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/phaul.htm Last updated: 27-Jun-2006 http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/phaul.htm 12/26/2006