ML050330144
| ML050330144 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 01/17/2005 |
| From: | Jefferson W Florida Power & Light Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-97-002, L-2005-010 | |
| Download: ML050330144 (3) | |
Text
AsL -
FPL Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 January 17, 2005 L-2005-01 0 10 CFR 50.36 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Re:
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Monthly Operatinq Report Pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.6, and the guidance of Generic Letter 97-02, attached are the December 2004 Operating Data Reports, Summary of Operating Experience Reports, and Unit Shutdowns for St. Lucie Units 1 and 2.
Please contact us should there be any questions regarding this information.
Very truly yours, William Jefferson, Jr.
Vice President St. Lucie Plant WJ/KWF Attachment 74 an FPL Group company
-a'.
L-2005-01 0 Attachment Page 1 of 2 OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO.
50-335 UNIT NAME St. Lucie I DATE January 09, COMPLETED BY K. R. B=ol r TELEPHONE (772) 47-7 REPORTING PERIOD:
Des I=
465 cember 2004 1.
2.
Design Electrical Rating Maximum Dependable Capacity (MWe-Net) 830.00 839.00 3.
4.
5.
6.
Number of Hours the Reactor was Critical Number of Hours Generator On-line Reserve Shutdown Hours Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWHrs)
This Month 744.00 744.00 0.00 636,242.00 Yr-to-Date 7,584.12 7,519.55 0.00 6,324,295.00 Cumulative 201,128.12 199,229.85 0.00 163,425,242.0 UNIT SHUTDOWNS Type Method of F: Forced Duration Shutting Cause & Corrective Action No.
Date S: Scheduled (Hours)
Reason 1 Down 2 Comments
SUMMARY
- St. Lucie Unit 1 was on-line and operated in Mode 1 the entire month. In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.6, there were no challenges to the PORVs or safety valves during the report period.
I 2
Reason:
A Equipment Failure (Explain)
B Maintenance or Test C
Refueling D
Regulatory Restriction E
Operator Training & License Examination F Administration G
Operational Error (Explain)
H Other (Explain)
Method:
1 Manual 2
Manual TriplScram 3
Automatic TriplScram 4
Continuation 5
Other (Explain)
^
L-2005-01 0 Attachment Page 2 of 2 OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO.
50-389 UNIT NAME St. Lucie 2 DATE January 09, COMPLETED BY K. R.B.oller TELEPHONE MM=
4 2005 748 I
REPORTING PERIOD:
December 2004
- 1. Design Electrical Rating
- 2.
Maximum Dependable Capacity (MWe-Net) 830.00 839.00 3.
4.
5.
6.
Number of Hours the Reactor was Critical Number of Hours Generator On-line Reserve Shutdown Hours Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWHrs)
This Month 604.77 582.85 0.00 487,192.00 Yr-to-Date 8,101.65 8,060.40 0.00 6,781,434.00 Cumulative 164,138.22 162,182.87 0.00 133,828,410.0 UNIT SHUTDOWNS Type Method of F: Forced Duration Shutting Cause & Corrective Action No.
Date S: Scheduled (Hours)
Reason 1 Down 2 Comments 003 12/2512004 F
161.15 A
2 St. Lucie Unit 2 performed a manual reactor trip on December 25, 2004, at 0651 hours0.00753 days <br />0.181 hours <br />0.00108 weeks <br />2.477055e-4 months <br /> following the loss of the 2B condensate pump. The unit remained off-line for the remainder of the month.
SUMMARY
- St. Lucie Unit 2 was on-line and operating in Mode 1 until December 25, 2004 when the manual reactor trip was performed at 0651 hours0.00753 days <br />0.181 hours <br />0.00108 weeks <br />2.477055e-4 months <br /> following a short downpower in response to a degraded 2B condensate pump motor.
A reactor startup commenced on December 26, 2004 with the unit critical at 1925 hours0.0223 days <br />0.535 hours <br />0.00318 weeks <br />7.324625e-4 months <br /> and Mode 1 entered at 2123 the same day. Unit 2 remained in Mode 1 until December 27, 2004, when a manual reactor trip was performed at 1720 hours0.0199 days <br />0.478 hours <br />0.00284 weeks <br />6.5446e-4 months <br /> due to low 2B steam generator level following a feedwater control system malfunction. The unit remained offline at the end of the reporting period. In accordance with Technical Specification 6.9.1.6, there were no challenges to the PORVs or safety valves during the report period.
I 2
Reason:
A Equipment Failure (Explain)
B Maintenance or Test C
Refueling D
Regulatory Restriction E
Operator Training & License Examination F
Administration G
Operational Error (Explain)
H Other (Explain)
Method:
1 Manual 2
Manual Trip/Scram 3
Automatic Trip/Scram 4
Continuation 5! Other (Explain)