ML043280655

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Technical Specifications, Amendment Re Loss of Offsite Power Instrumentation Logic System Functional Test Surveillance. TAC No MC3615 and MC3616
ML043280655
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/22/2004
From:
NRC/NRR/DLPM
To:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Gratton C, NRR/DLPM 415-1055
Shared Package
ML043130556 List:
References
TAC MC3615, TAC MC3616
Download: ML043280655 (4)


Text

LOP Instrumentation 3.3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

-- A----------------

NOTES----------------

1.

Refer to Table 3.3.8.1-1 to determine which SRs apply for each LOP Function.

2.

When a 4.16 kV Emergency Bus Undervottage channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry Into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> provided the assIcaated Function maintains initiation capability (for Functions 1 and 2) and annunciation capability (for Function 3).

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.8.1.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK.

12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> SR 3.3.8.1.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.

31 days SR 3.3.8.1.3 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION.

18 months SR 3.3.8.1.4 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST.

24 months I

HATCH UNIT I 3.3-65 Amendment N~o. 243

LOP Instrumentation B 3.3.8.1 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SR 3.3.8.1.4 (continued)

The system functional testing performed in LCO 3.8.1 and LCO 3.8.2 overlaps this Surveillance to provide complete testing of the assumed safety functions.-

The 24 month Frequency Is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a plant outage and the potential for an unplanned transient If the Surveillance were performed -with-the-reactor at power. The 24 month frequency Is further based on a review of surveillance test history.

I REFERENCES

1.

FSAR, Section 8.4.

2.

FSAR, Section 4.8.

3.

FSAR, Section 6.5.

4.

FSAR, Chapter 14.

5.

NRC No.93-102, OFinal Policy Statement on Technical Specification Improvements,O July 23, 1993.

HATCH UNIT 1 B 3.3-192 Amendment No. 243 d

LOP Instrumentation 3.3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS a 20%-T-rC!r N

I

1.

Refer to Table 3.3.8.1-1 to determine which SRs apply for each LOP Function.

2.

When a 4.16 kV Emergency Bus Undervoltage channel is placed in an Inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry Into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to6 hours proItded he associated Function maintains initiation capability (for Functions 1 and 2) and annunciation capability (for Function 3).

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.8.1.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> SR 3.3.8.1.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST.

31 days SR 3.3.8.1.3 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION.

18 months SR 3.3.8.1.4 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST.

24 months I

HATCH UNIT 2 3.3-65 Amendment flo. 186

LOP Instrumentation B 3.3.8.1 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SR 3.3.8.1.4 (continued)

The system functional testing performed In LCO 3.8.1 and LCO 3.8.2 overlaps this Surveillance to provide complete testing of the assumed safety-functions -- - --- --

The 24 month Frequency Is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a plant outage and the potential for an unplanned transient If the Surveillance were performed with the-reactor at power. The 24 month frequency is further based on a review of surveillance test history.

REFERENCES

1.

FSAR, Section 8.3.1.

2.

FSAR, Section 5.2.

3.

FSAR, Section 6.3.

4.

FSAR, Chapter 15.

5.

NRC No.93-102, Final Policy Statement on Technical Specification Improvements, July 23, 1993.

HATCH UNIT 2 B 3.3-193 Amendment No.

186 Ji