Letter Sequence Draft RAI |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0408603072004-03-17017 March 2004
License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
ML0408500742004-03-17017 March 2004
Transmittal of Proprietary Information to Support License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
ML0410501752004-04-0101 April 2004
Background Information to Support License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
ML0411906062004-04-28028 April 2004
Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0415603392004-05-26026 May 2004
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0415901572004-06-10010 June 2004
FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC - Stretch Power Uprate Acceptance Review for Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML0421900852004-08-18018 August 2004
Request for Additional Information for Proposed Amendment Request Regarding the Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: RAI
ML0423607522004-08-24024 August 2004
Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0424600712004-09-0202 September 2004
Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
SBK-L-04049, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 03.022004-09-13013 September 2004
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 03.02
Project stage: Response to RAI
SBK-L-04052, Re-submittal of Proprietary Information to Support License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate2004-09-13013 September 2004
Re-submittal of Proprietary Information to Support License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
SBK-L-04044, Changes to License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate2004-09-13013 September 2004
Changes to License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Request
ML0424003652004-09-15015 September 2004
Memo, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safety Review of Stretch Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Approval
ML0428902812004-10-12012 October 2004
Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0818505222004-10-13013 October 2004
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Review of Stretch Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Approval
ML0409804772004-10-14014 October 2004
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, Stretch Power Uprate NSSS Licensing Report Supplemental Information, WCAP-16223-NP
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
SBK-L-04095, Revision to Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03. Application for Stretch Power Uprate2004-10-28028 October 2004
Revision to Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03. Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0430803222004-11-19019 November 2004
Withholding from Public Disclosure, Westinghouse Responses to NRC Requests for Additional Information (Rais) for Seabrook Station Stretch Power Uprate (Proprietary)
Project stage: RAI
SBK-L-04116, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI Nos. 2 and 3) Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03. Application for Stretch Power Uprate2004-12-0303 December 2004
Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI Nos. 2 and 3) Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03. Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Supplement
ML0429300082004-12-0808 December 2004
Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact - Power Uprate Modification
Project stage: Other
ML0435000312004-12-15015 December 2004
Facsimile Transmission, Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML0503901482005-02-0808 February 2005
Publication in Federal Register of Individual Notice Transmitting Environmental Assessment
Project stage: Other
SBK-L-05032, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate2005-02-0909 February 2005
Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Supplement
SBK-L-05054, Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate2005-02-25025 February 2005
Supplemental Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 04-03, Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Supplement
ML0501404532005-02-28028 February 2005
License Amendment, Increase the Licensed Rated Power by 5.2 Percent from 3411 Megawatts Thermal to 3587 Megawatts Thermal
Project stage: Other
2004-04-28
[Table View] |
Text
August 24, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO:
James W. Clifford, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Scott P. Wall, Project Manager, Section 2
/RA/
Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
SEABROOK STATION, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MC2364)
By letter dated August 18, 2004, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE or the licensee), application to increase the licensed thermal power level at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1.
The NRC staff determined that clarification was needed for RAI #22. The attached revised RAI was transmitted on August 23, 2004, to Mr. Michael OKeefe (FPLES) and replaces RAI #22 in its entirety. Mr. O'Keefe has agreed to use this version of RAI #22 in FPLE's response letter.
Docket No. 50-443
Attachment:
RAI
August 24, 2004 MEMORANDUM TO:
James W. Clifford, Chief, Section 2 Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
Scott P. Wall, Project Manager, Section 2
/RA/
Project Directorate I Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
SEABROOK STATION, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (TAC NO. MC2364)
By letter dated August 18, 2004, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff issued a request for additional information (RAI) regarding the FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC (FPLE or the licensee), application to increase the licensed thermal power level at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1.
The NRC staff determined that clarification was needed for RAI #22. The attached revised RAI was transmitted on August 23, 2004, to Mr. Michael OKeefe (FPLES) and replaces RAI #22 in its entirety. Mr. O'Keefe has agreed to use this version of RAI #22 in FPLE's response letter.
Docket No. 50-443
Attachment:
RAI DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC PDI-2 Reading JClifford DCollins SWall ACCESSION NO.: ML042360752 OFFICE PDI-2/PM NAME SWall DATE 08-23-04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Attachment REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED STRETCH POWER UPRATE (SPU) AMENDMENT SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (SEABROOK)
DOCKET NO. 50-443 Revised Question #22 22.
In Section 9.1.3, the licensee provides a comparison of maximum FAC rates in the moisture separator drain piping for current operating conditions and projected power uprate conditions. The licensee also indicates that, as part of the implementation of the SPU, the Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) CHECWORKS computer program will be revised to include the appropriate post-SPU operating parameters. Specifically, this revised model will be used to select inspection locations that will establish new baseline data for areas that may be susceptible to significant wear.
For the current operating conditions, discuss any instances where CHECWORKS significantly under predicted actual wall loss due to FAC. Include any locations where CHECWORKS predicted no wall loss and significant wall loss occurred. Discuss any corrective actions taken as a result of FAC under prediction. If there were instances where FAC rates were significantly under predicted, discuss whether the SPU operating conditions could exacerbate this under prediction.
