ML022540009

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 05000369-02-006, IR 05000370-02-006, IR 05000413-02-006 and IR 05000414-02-006 on 07/08 -26/2002, Duke Energy Corporation, McGuire and Catawba Nuclear Stations, Units 1 & 2. License Renewal Inspection Program, Aging Management Programs
ML022540009
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, Catawba, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/2002
From: Mccree V
Division of Reactor Safety I
To: Tuckman M
Duke Energy Corp
References
IR-02-006
Download: ML022540009 (52)


See also: IR 05000369/2002006

Text

1

September 9, 2002

Mr. M. S. Tuckman

Executive Vice-President

Nuclear Generation

Duke Energy Corporation

PO Box 1006

Charlotte, NC 28201-1006

SUBJECT:

MCGUIRE AND CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATIONS - NRC INSPECTION

REPORT 50-369/02-06, 50-370/02-06, 50-413/02-06 AND 50-414/02-06

Dear Mr. Tuckman:

On July 26, 2002, the NRC completed an inspection regarding your application for license

renewal for the McGuire and Catawba Nuclear Stations. The enclosed inspection report

presents the results of that inspection. The results of this inspection were discussed with

members of your staff on July 26, 2002, in a public exit meeting at the Duke Energy

Corporation offices.

The purpose of this inspection was to examine activities that support your application for

renewed license for the McGuire and Catawba facilities. The inspection consisted of a selected

examination of procedures and representative records, and interviews with personnel regarding

your proposed aging management programs to support license extension. In addition, for a

sample of plant systems, inspectors performed a visual examination of accessible portions of

the systems to observe any effects of equipment aging.

The inspection concluded that the existing aging management programs are being conducted

as described in your License Renewal Application and your plans for new aging management

programs appear acceptable to manage plant aging.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its

enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document

Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system

(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

2

DEC

Should you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Caudle Julian at

(404) 562 - 4603.

Sincerely,

\\RA by Loren Plisco For\\

Victor M. McCree, Deputy Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 and 50-413, 50-414

License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17 and NPF-35, NPF-52

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report w/attachments

cc w/encl: - See page 3

3

DEC

cc: w/encl:

Mr. Gary Gilbert

Regulatory Compliance Manager

Duke Energy Corporation

4800 Concord Road

York, South Carolina 29745

Ms. Lisa F. Vaughn

Duke Energy Corporation

422 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006

Anne Cottingham, Esquire

Winston and Strawn

1400 L Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

North Carolina Municipal Power

Agency Number 1

1427 Meadowwood Boulevard

P. O. Box 29513

Raleigh, North Carolina 27626

County Manager of York County

York County Courthouse

York, South Carolina 29745

Piedmont Municipal Power Agency

121 Village Drive

Greer, South Carolina 29651

Ms. Karen E. Long

Assistant Attorney General

North Carolina Department of Justice

P. O. Box 629

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Ms. Elaine Wathen, Lead REP Planner

Division of Emergency Management

116 West Jones Street

Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-1335

Mr. Robert L. Gill, Jr.

Duke Energy Corporation

Mail Stop EC-12R

P. O. Box 1006

Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006

Mr. Alan Nelson

Nuclear Energy Institute

1776 I Street, N.W., Suite 400

Washington, DC 20006-3708

North Carolina Electric Membership

Corporation

P. O. Box 27306

Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

Catawba Senior Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

4830 Concord Road

York, South Carolina 29745

Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Licensing

Duke Energy Corporation

526 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006

Mr. L. A. Keller

Duke Energy Corporation

526 South Church Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28201-1006

Saluda River Electric

P. O. Box 929

Laurens, South Carolina 29360

Mr. Peter R. Harden, IV

VP-Customer Relations and Sales

Westinghouse Electric Company

6000 Fairview Road

12th Floor

Charlotte, North Carolina 28210

Mr. T. Richard Puryear

Owners Group (NCEMC)

Duke Energy Corporation

4800 Concord Road

York, South Carolina 29745

4

DEC

cc w/encl contd:

Mr. Richard M. Fry, Director

North Carolina Dept of Env, Health, and

Natural Resources

3825 Barrett Drive

Raleigh, North Carolina 27609-7721

County Manager of

Mecklenburg County

720 East Fourth Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Mr. Jeffrey Thomas

Regulatory Compliance Manager

Duke Energy Corporation

McGuire Nuclear Site

12700 Hagers Ferry Road

Huntersville, North Carolina 28078

McGuire Senior Resident Inspector

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

12700 Hagers Ferry Road

Huntersville, North Carolina 28078

Dr. John M. Barry

Mecklenburg County

Department of Environmental Protection

700 N. Tryon Street

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Mr. Gregory D. Robison

Duke Energy Corporation

Mail Stop EC-12R

526 S. Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28201-1006

Ms. Mary Olson

Nuclear Information & Resource Service

Southeast Office

P.O.Box 7586

Asheville, North Carolina 28802

Mr. Paul Gunter

Nuclear Information & Resource Service

1424 16th Street NW, Suite 404

Washington, DC 20036

Mr. Lou Zeller

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League

P. O. Box 88

Glendale Springs, North Carolina 28629

Mr. Don Moniak

Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League

Aiken Office

P.O. Box 3487

Aiken, South Carolina 29802-3487

Mr. Henry J. Porter, Assistant Director

Division of Waste Management

Bureau of Land & Waste Management

S. C. Dept. of Health and Environ. Control

2600 Bull Street

Columbia, South Carolina 29201-1708

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION II

Docket Nos.

50-369, 50-370 and 50-413, 50-414

License Nos.

NPF-9, NPF-17 and NPF-35, NPF-52

Report No:

50-369/02-06, 50-370/02-06, 50-413/02-06 AND 50-414/02-06

Licensee:

Duke Energy Corporation (DEC)

Facility:

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2 and

Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2

Location:

12700 Hagers Ferry Rd.

Huntersville NC 28078

4830 Concord Rd.

York SC 29745

Dates:

July 8 - 26, 2002

Inspectors:

B. Crowley, Reactor Inspector

M. Farber, Reactor Inspector RIII

R. Moore, Reactor Inspector

K. Van Doorn, Reactor Inspector

H. Wang, Operations Engineer, NRR

Approved by:

Caudle Julian

Team Leader

Division of Reactor Safety

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I

Report Details . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

I. Inspection Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

II. Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

A. Review of Mechanical Aging Management Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1. Inservice Inspection (ISI) Plan

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

2. Flow Accelerated Corrosion (FAC) Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

3. Reactor Vessel Integrity Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

4. Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

5. Steam Generator Surveillance Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

6. Thimble Tube Inspection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

7. Alloy 600 Aging Management Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

8. Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Nozzle and Other Vessel Closure

Penetration Inspection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

9. Chemistry Control Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

10. Battery Rack Inspections

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

11. Heat Exchanger Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

12. Preventive Maintenance Activities - Carbon Steel Coatings Inspections . . . 9

13. Sump Pump Systems Inspection

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

14. Borated Water System Stainless Steel Inspection (BWSSSI) . . . . . . . . . . 10

15. Selective Leaching Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

16. Treated Water Systems Stainless Steel Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

17. Waste Gas System Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

18. Liquid Waste System Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

19. Fluid Leak Management Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

20. Boraflex Monitoring Program (McGuire Only) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

21. Divider Barrier Seal Inspection and Testing Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

22. Galvanic Susceptibility Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

23. Ice Condenser Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

24. Thermal Fatigue Management Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

25. Reactor Coolant System (NC) Operational Leakage Monitoring Program . 16

26. Service Water Piping Corrosion Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

27. Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

28. Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Volume Program (Catawba only) . . 17

29. Pressurizer Spray Head Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

B. Review of Electrical Equipment Aging Management Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

1. Non - EQ Insulated Cables and Connections Aging Management Program 17

2. Inaccessible Non-EQ Medium Voltage Cables Aging Management Program18

3. Applicant Response to Station Blackout Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

C. Review of Structural Aging Management Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

1. Containment Inservice Inspection Plan - IWE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

2. Containment Leak Rate Testing Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3. Flood Barrier Inspection (McGuire) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

4. Inspection Program for Civil Engineering Structures and Components . . . . 21

5. Underwater Inspection of Nuclear Service Water Structures

. . . . . . . . . . . 22

6. Technical Specification SR 3.6.16.3 Visual Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

7. Crane Inspection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

2

D. Fire Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

E. Visual Observations of Plant Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

F. Future Implementation of License Renewal Commitments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

III .Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

Exit Meeting Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

ATTACHMENT 1 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

ATTACHMENT 2 MCGUIRE AND CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATIONS AGING MANAGEMENT

PROGRAM INSPECTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

ATTACHMENT 3 LIST OF ACRONYMS USED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

I

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000369-02-06, IR 05000370-02-06, 05000413-02-06, 05000414-02-06; 07/08-26 /2002;

Duke Energy Corporation, McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 & 2 and Catawba Nuclear Station,

Units 1 & 2. License Renewal Inspection Program, Aging Management Programs.

This inspection of License Renewal activities was performed by five regional office engineering

inspectors, and one staff member from the office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. The

inspection program followed was NRC Manual Chapter 2516 and NRC Inspection Procedure 71002. This inspection did not identify any findings as defined in NRC Manual Chapter 0612.

The inspection concluded that the existing aging management programs are being conducted

as described in your License Renewal Application (LRA). Discussions with engineering staff

and review of available documentation for expansion of existing programs and creation of new

aging management programs demonstrated that plans were consistent with the LRA and

appear acceptable to manage plant aging.

At McGuire, the Applicant identified during this inspection that there was no surveillance

procedure for a visual inspection of the exposed surfaces of fire rated assemblies on an 18-

month frequency as required by Selected Licensee Commitment TR16.9.5.7. This situation has

existed since 1990. At Catawba, the Applicant identified that two fire protection surveillances

were being performed but, were not being correctly documented.

The inspectors noted that the Applicant was progressing toward implementation of aging

management programs. The Applicant had a written program document for Reactor Vessel

Integrity and had a draft program for the Reactor Vessel Interals inspections. The inspectors

observed that the Applicant had a good draft plan for tracking and implementing procedure

changes and other actions needed to implement future aging management programs. Full

implementation will be confirmed during a future inspection.

The inspectors performed numerous visual inspections on portions of plant equipment to

attempt to observe aging effects. The overall condition of plant equipment was generally very

good. At Catawba, in the pump house intake structure, the inspector observed some piping

with heavy corrosion caused by continuous spray from pump seal leakoff. The Applicant took

measurements to verify that the pipe wall thickness had not corroded below minimum allowable.

Attachment 1 presents a partial list of persons contacted and a list of the documents reviewed.

Attachment 2 presents the inspection sample selected. Attachment 3 presents a list of

acronyms used in this report.

1

Report Details

I. Inspection Scope

This inspection was conducted by NRC Region II inspectors, a Region III inspector, and

members of the NRR staff to interview Applicant personnel and to examine a sample of

documentation which supports the license renewal application (LRA). This inspection reviewed

the implementation of the Applicants Aging Management Programs. The team reviewed

supporting documentation and interviewed Applicant personnel to confirm the accuracy of the

LRA conclusions. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the Aging Management Programs were

reviewed for both sites.

For a sample of plant systems, inspectors performed visual examination of accessible portions

of the systems to observe any effects of equipment aging. Attachment 1 of this report lists the

Applicant personnel contacted and the documents reviewed. The Aging Management

Programs selected for inspection are listed in Attachment 2 of this report. A list of acronyms

used in this report is provided in Attachment 3.

II. Findings

A. Review of Mechanical Aging Management Programs

1. Inservice Inspection (ISI) Plan

The ISI Plan (Program), an existing program, is credited in the LRA as an aging management

program for the ASME Class 1 reactor coolant (RC) system, including exterior surfaces and

bolted closures; piping, valve bodies, and pump casings; pressurizer; reactor vessel and CRDM

pressure boundary components; reactor vessel internals; and steam generators (including

some secondary side components). In addition, the ISI Program is credited as an aging

management program for component supports. The McGuire Unit 1 ISI program has been

converted to a risk-informed (RI) ISI program (based on Westinghouse Topical Report WCAP-

14572) for the 3rd Interval. The applicable Code is ASME Section XI, 1995 Editon. Plans are to

convert the McGuire Unit 2 program to RI after completion of the 2nd Interval. The current Code

for McGuire Unit 2 is the 1989 Edition of ASME Section XI. Both Units at Catawba are in the

2nd Interval and the applicable Code is ASME Section XI, 1989 Edition.

The ISI Program is credited for managing loss of material, cracking, loss of pre-load, and

reduction in fracture toughness for: stainless steel, cast stainless steel, nickel-based alloy, low

alloy steel, and carbon steel. The program consists of performing surface and volumetric

nondestructive examinations of piping and components in accordance with the ASME Boiler

and Pressure Vessel Code and other augmented requirements such as NUREGs, Generic

Letters, etc. The ISI Program is controlled by:

Third Interval Inservice Inspection Plan McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 1 - General

Requirements and Volume 1, Revision 0

Second Interval Inservice Inspection Plan McGuire Station Units 1 & 2 - General

Requirements and Volume 1, Revision 3

Catawba Nuclear Station Second Ten-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan

2

The program documents are updated each 10-year interval and submitted to the NRC for

approval of any relief requests. Inspection plan and procedures implement the program.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Activity/Program as described in

the LRA and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment 1. To verify

that the ISI Program was in place and was being implemented, the inspectors reviewed the

above program documents (ISI Plans), discussed various aspects of the program with

responsible Applicant personnel, and reviewed inspection plans and results as listed in

Attachment 1 of this report.

Also, periodic inspections of ISI activities are performed by NRC ISI inspectors during outages.

Recent inspections have found activities to be performed in accordance with program and plan

requirements.

During the review, the inspectors identified the following discrepancies when comparing the ISI

Plans with Section B3.20 and Table 3.1-1 of the McGuire and Catawba LRA:

Table 3.1-1 of the LRA lists the ISI Plan as an aging management program for loss of

material and cracking of pressurizer surge and spray nozzle thermal sleeves. The

McGuire and Catawba ISI Plans do not include these components.

Table 3.1-1 of the LRA lists the ISI Plan as an aging management program for cracking

and loss of material of the steam generator divider plates. The McGuire and Catawba

ISI plans do not include these components.

In both cases, the ISI plans were not the only aging management programs referenced. The

Applicant agreed with the discrepancies identified and stated that for the two components

identified, additional aging management reviews would be performed to determine if the

programs taken credit for (absent the ISI Plan) were adequate to manage aging of the

pressurizer spray and surge nozzle thermal sleeves and the steam generator divider plates.

In addition to the ASME Section XI Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Inspection that is conducted

once per 10 years, the Applicant identified future aging management inspection activities for the

Reactor Vessel Internals (see paragraph 4 below). Also, augmented inspections and

evaluations will be performed under the ISI program for a McGuire Unit 2 cast stainless steel

RC cold leg elbow to satisfy thermal embrittlement concerns. The Applicant will also include

aging management of Class 1 small bore piping (less than 4" NPS) in the ISI program using a

risk informed process. The risk informed ISI programs for McGuire include small bore Class 1

piping. The risk informed ISI programs for Catawba will be developed later.

The inspectors concluded that ISI activities are being conducted as described in the ISI Plans.

With the exception of the discrepancies for pressurizer spray and surge nozzle thermal sleeves

and the steam generator divider plates, the ISI program includes the systems and components

listed in the LRA, for which the LRA credited the ISI Program for aging management. Adequate

guidance had been provided to reasonably ensure that aging effects will be appropriately

managed.

2. Flow Accelerated Corrosion (FAC) Program

FAC is an aggressive material thinning of carbon steel piping materials resulting from high

energy steam/fluid flow. The FAC Program, an existing program, is credited in the LRA as an

3

aging management program for portions of the auxiliary feedwater (Catawba only), auxiliary

steam, boron recycle, feedwater, liquid radwaste (Catawba only), liquid waste recycle (McGuire

only), liquid waste monitor and disposal (McGuire only), steam generator blowdown recycle

(Catawba only), and turbine exhaust (McGuire only) systems.

The program is credited for managing the loss of material in carbon steel piping and

components and consists of monitoring the wall thickness of susceptible carbon steel piping

and components in various systems, and replacing affected piping prior to failure. In many

cases, FAC resistant materials are used for replacements. The program is consistent with the

guidelines of EPRI NSAC-202L, Recommendations for an Effective Flow-Accelerated Corrosion

Program. The program computer models susceptible systems and predicts wear rates. The

model is supplemented and updated with periodic thickness inspections of selected

components each cycle. Based on the model and inspection results, decisions are made on

pipe replacement schedules.

The FAC Program is controlled by Engineering Support Document (ESD), Flow Accelerated

Corrosion Program, Revision 3, and site specific programs and procedures as listed in

Attachment 1. The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as

described in the LRA and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment

1. In addition to review of the above program implementing documents (ESD and site

procedures) and discussion of the program with responsible Applicant personnel, the inspectors

reviewed inspection plans and the FAC inspection outage reports, as listed in Attachment 1, for

past outages for each Unit to verify that the program was in place and being implemented. The

inspectors also reviewed the program implementation package detailed in Applicant

Specification CNS-1274.00-00-0016.

The inspectors concluded that the FAC Program was in place, had been implemented, and

included the systems and components identified in the LRA and should manage aging effects

as defined in the LRA. Adequate guidance had been provided to reasonably ensure that aging

effects will be appropriately managed.

3. Reactor Vessel Integrity Program

The RV Integrity Program, an existing program, is credited in the LRA as an aging management

program for managing reduction in fracture toughness for the RV. The program uses

toughness data from test of surveillance capsule specimens to analyze Pressurized Thermal

Shock (PTS), Upper Shelf Energy (USE), and to generate Pressure/Temperature (P/T) curves.

Additional monitoring of fluence received by the surveillance specimens, effective full power

years (EFPY), cavity dosimetry, and plant changes are used to perform these analyses. For

neutron embrittlement considerations, USE and PTS calculations are time limited aging

analyses per 10 CFR 54.3 that have been updated by the Applicant to cover the period of

extended license.

The Reactor Vessel Integrity Management activities are controlled by the ESD Reactor Vessel

Integrity Program, Applicant procedures, and engineering calculations, as listed in Attachment 1

below. The applicable requirements are detailed in the UFSARs, Technical Specifications, 10 CFR 50.61, and 10 CFR 50, Appendices G and H.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as described in the LRA

and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment 1. In addition to

review of the above program implementing document (ESD) and discussion of the program with

4

responsible Applicant personnel, the inspectors reviewed plant specific data, including:

completed Maintenance Procedures (MPs) for removal of specimens; test results from capsule

specimens; Operator Aid Computer monitoring of EFPY; and calculation results for USE, PTS,

and P/T Curves, as listed in Attachment 1, to verify that the program was in place and being

implemented.

Although the ESD, Reactor Vessel Integrity Program had been issued and the various aspects

of the Program were in place and had been implemented, Applicant personnel indicated that

improvements in the program document are planned. The inspectors concluded that the

Reactor Vessel Integrity Program was in place, had been implemented, and was consistent with

the description in the LRA. The program should reasonably ensure that aging effects will be

appropriately managed.

4. Reactor Vessel Internals (RVI) Inspection

The RVI Inspection, is a new inspection that is credited in the LRA as an aging management

program for the RVIs. The program supplements the ASME ISI Plan and is credited for

managing cracking, reduction in fracture toughness, dimensional changes, and loss of pre-load

in stainless steel and cast stainless steel RVI components.

This is a new program to be implemented in the period of extended license. The inspections

will include visual and volumetric inspections. The inspections will be based on future

characterization of RVI aging effects developed from inspection of other nuclear plants,

inspection of Oconee internals, and activities of industry groups focused on internals aging

effects. McGuire Unit 1 will be DECs lead Westinghouse plant for RVI inspection, which is

planned for the 5th ISI interval. Based on the results of Oconee and McGuire Unit 1 inspections,

decisions will be made relative to inspection of McGuire Unit 2 and Catawba Units 1 and 2.

NRR Request for Additional Information (RAI) questions the validity of use of Oconee

inspection data because of different design plants (B&W versus Westinghouse). The Applicant

responded by stating that additional data is needed to properly evaluate the susceptible

locations for inspection and that Oconee results and results from other industry inspections will

provide some data prior to the McGuire and Catawba inspections. Although no inspections are

planned until the 5th McGuire ISI interval, in the period of extended operation, proposed ESD,

McGuire and Catawba Reactor Vessel Internals Aging Management Program, was currently

being drafted.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as described in the LRA

and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment 1. In addition the

inspectors reviewed the above proposed ESD program implementing document and discussed

the planned program with responsible Applicant personnel.

The inspectors concluded that the planned inspections were in accordance with those identified

in the LRA.

5. Steam Generator Surveillance Program

The Steam Generator Surveillance Program, an existing program, is credited in the LRA as an

aging management program for the aging effects of cracking and loss of material in nickel-

based alloys 600 and 690 steam generator tubes and plugs. In addition, based on response to

NRR RAI 2.3.1-4, the program is also credited as an aging management program for cracking

and loss of material in alloy steel, stainless steel, and carbon steel tube supports. In addition to

5

Technical Specification requirements, inspections follow the recommendations of Electric

Power Research Institute (EPRI) Guidelines and Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 97-06, Steam

Generator Monitoring Guidelines. The program includes: periodic inspection of tubing and

plugs, secondary side inspections, tube integrity assessments, assessment of degradation

mechanisms, primary to secondary leakage monitoring, sludge lancing, maintenance and

repairs, and foreign material exclusion. The main program controls are the Steam Generator

Management Program, Revision 4, and associated procedures and plans.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as described in the LRA

and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment 1. In addition to

review of the program implementing procedures and discussion of the program with responsible

Applicant personnel, the inspectors reviewed the most recently completed Steam Generator

Outage Reports for all four Units, as listed in Attachment 1. This review was to verify that the

Steam Generator Surveillance Program was in place and being implemented. The inspectors

also reviewed the completed Catawba LR program implementation package detailed in

Applicant Specification CNS-1274.00-00-0016.

The inspectors concluded that the Steam Generator Surveillance Program was in place, had

been implemented, and was consistent with the description detailed in the LRA. Activities in

place should reasonably ensure that aging effects will be appropriately managed.

6. Thimble Tube Inspection Program

The Thimble Tube Inspection Program, an existing program, is credited in the LRA as an aging

management program managing the effect of material loss due to fretting wear of thimble

tubes. The program was initiated in response to NRC Bulletin 88-09 and is controlled by site

calculations and implementing procedures as listed in Attachment 1.

The program consists of periodic eddy current (ECT) measurements of tube wall thickness and

engineering analysis to show that the wear rate will not result in violation of minimum wall

thickness through the life of the plant. The last measurements were taken in 2002 for McGuire

Unit 1,1993 for McGuire Unit 2, 1999 for Catawba Unit 1, and 1998 for Catawba Unit 2. Future

inspections are dictated based on wear rates.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as described in the LRA

and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment 1. In addition to

review of the above program calculations and procedures and discussion of the program with

responsible Applicant personnel, the inspectors reviewed the completed inspection results for

the last inspections for each unit, including the engineering evaluation that determined the

acceptability of the thimble tubes. The inspectors also reviewed the completed McGuire and

Catawba LR program implementation packages detailed in Applicant Specifications MCC-

1274.00-00-0016 and CNS-1274.00-00-0016.

The inspectors concluded that the thimble tube inspection program had been implemented, was

consistent with the description in the LRA and should manage aging effects as defined in the

LRA.

7. Alloy 600 Aging Management Review

The Alloy 600 Aging Management Review is a new activity to ensure that nickel-based alloy

locations are identified and adequately inspected by other programs such as the ISI Plan, the

6

Control Rod Drive Mechanism and Other Vessel Head Penetration Program, etc. A review will

be performed to locate all of the nickle-based alloy locations at McGuire and Catawba and

based on industry and Duke operating experience, inspection methods and frequency will be

adjusted as needed. Based on the LRA, the review will be completed following the issuance of

the renewed operating licenses and by the end of the initial license of McGuire Unit 1 and

Catawba Unit 1. Proposed Engineering Support Document (ESD), Alloy 600 Aging

Management Oconee, McGuire and Catawba Nuclear Stations, was being prepared at the time

of the inspection.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as described in the LRA

and the supporting Aging Management Specification listed in Attachment 1. In addition the

inspectors reviewed the above proposed ESD and discussed the planned activity with

responsible Applicant personnel. The alloy 600 program will accomplish the review to

determine the locations of alloy 600 and provide the details for inspection of each location.

Based on these discussions, much of the review has been completed and plans are to have the

Alloy 600 Aging Management Program issued by mid-2003. The inspectors concluded that the

planned inspections were in accordance with those identified in the LRA.

8. Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Nozzle and Other Vessel Closure Penetration

Inspection Program

The Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Nozzle and Other Vessel Closure Penetration

Inspection Program, a new program, is credited in the LRA as an aging management program

for primary water stress corrosion cracking (PWSCC) of high nickel alloy RV head penetrations

and is a complimentary program to the ISI Plan. For the remainder of this report, the program

is referred to as CRDM Nozzle Inspection Program. The Fluid Leak Management Program

and the Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage Monitoring Program are used in

conjunction with the CRDM Nozzle Inspection Program to manage aging of reactor vessel head

penetrations.

A proposed document on PWSCC of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetrations to control the

inspection of CRDMs and other RV head penetrations was being prepared at the time of the

inspection.

The inspectors reviewed the applicable Aging Management Program as described in the LRA

and the supporting Aging Management Specification. In addition, the proposed ESD was

reviewed and the program was discussed with Applicant personnel. The Applicant indicated

that this program and the Alloy 600 Aging Management Review, detailed in paragraph 7 above,

would actually be part of the same program, the RV head penetrations being one of the

locations of nickle-based alloy.

The inspectors found that the LRA, Section B.3.9, was confusing relative to whether the

inspections detailed for CRDM penetrations were inspections currently being performed or

inspections to be performed in the future. The Applicant stated that the inspections detailed in

the LRA were new planned future inspections that had been identified prior to the most recent

industry cracking problems with CRDM nozzles, which are being handled under NRC Bulletins.

The Applicant further stated that, based on Oconee experience, DEC was aware of the

cracking issues prior to the issue of NRC Bulletin 2001-01 and took the Oconee experience into

account during preparation of LRA Section B.3.9. Based on review of the LRA and discussions

with Applicant personnel, planned inspections include both visual and volumetric inspections

and are to be performed after issuance of the renewed operating licenses and the end of the

7

initial license for McGuire Unit 1 and Catawba Unit 1. The Unit 1 results will provide leading

indicators for Unit 2 results at each station. The timing of the inspections may change based on

either DEC specific experience or industry experience. Visual inspections are to be performed

of all accessible CRDM type penetrations every refueling outage. A 100% visual inspection is

to be performed of the bare heads during each 10 year ISI interval. Volumetric inspections will

apply to the CRDM type penetrations and the head vent penetrations. The number of

penetrations inspected will be based on both Duke specific experience and industry experience.

After determining that the CRDM penetration inspections detailed in the LRA were identified

prior to all of the current industry inspections under NRC Bulletins 2001-01 and 2002-02, the

inspectors questioned the Applicant relative to additional planned inspections in response to

current CRDM cracking issues. This is also the subject of NRR RAI B.3.9-1. As noted above,

the Applicant pointed out that the Oconee CRDM cracking experience had been taken into

account in the LRA planned inspections. In addition, the licensee pointed out that in response

to NRC Bulletins and current industry cracking issues, bare metal inspections have been

performed for McGuire Unit 2 (March 2002) and Catawba Unit 1 (April 2002). The other two

units are to be inspected during the next refueling outages.

The NRC staff is currently reviewing issues associated with CRDM nozzle cracking and any

future regulatory actions that may be required as a result of those reviews will be addressed by

the staff in a separate regulatory action.

9. Chemistry Control Program

This is an existing mitigation program which is credited for managing the aging effects of loss of

material and/or cracking of components exposed to borated water, closed cooling water, fuel

oil, and treated water environments. The program manages the relevant conditions that lead to

the onset and propagation of loss of material and cracking which could result in loss of structure

or component intended function.

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation, discussed the program with responsible

station personnel, and reviewed documentation of periodic chemistry sampling and trend

information. The station Chemistry Manual and Chemistry Management Procedures specified

sampling scope, acceptance criteria, frequency, and corrective actions for sample results not

withing the acceptance criteria. The inspectors verified that the systems and parameters

presently sampled were consistent with the program description in the Application.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate historic reviews of plant

specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects. The Applicant had

provided adequate guidance to ensure aging effects will be appropriately managed. As

implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the fluid systems will

be maintained through the period of extended operation.

10. Battery Rack Inspections

This is an existing activity which is credited with managing the loss of material that could impact

the battery racks intended function of structural support. Loss of material due to aging and

cracking are the potential aging effects. The inspectors reviewed the program activity

documentation, including completed annual inspection documentation, Technical Specification

requirements for periodic battery inspections, and field verified the present material condition of

the racks.

8

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate historic reviews of plant

specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects. The Applicant had

provided adequate guidance to ensure aging effects will be appropriately managed. As

implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the fluid systems will

be maintained through the period of extended operation.

11. Heat Exchanger Activities

These are performance monitoring and condition monitoring programs to manage the aging

effects on heat exchangers exposed to raw water. The activities manage two aging effects.

They manage the aging effects due to fouling which impact the component heat transfer

function. They also manage aging effects due to the loss of material that can impact the

pressure boundary function of the equipment. The scope of the heat exchanger activities

includes heat exchangers in different systems which are composed of different materials and

include existing, enhanced, and new programs.

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation, including completed procedures and

corrective actions for existing programs. The LRA program enhancements were identified and

documented in MCS-1274.00-00-0016 and CNS-1274.00-00-0016, License Renewal

Commitments rev. 0. The new program commitments were documented in the UFSAR LRA

Supplement, Chapter 18. New programs were required for inspection and cleaning of safety

related pump motor air handling unit heat exchangers and pump motor oil coolers.

The inspectors noted two examples in which the aging management program descriptions for

heat exchanger activities in the application were inconsistent with the existing and proposed

practice. The existing and proposed heat exchanger maintenance activity for cleaning of heat

exchanger tubes of the ECCS pump motor air handling units is to perform cleaning based on

results of a heat exchanger differential pressure test (performance based activity). The

program description in the application states the tubes will be cleaned periodically (prescription

activity). The aging management program description for the Containment Spray (NS) heat

exchangers states that eddy current testing will be performed on the perimeter tubes of each

NS heat exchanger at least every 5 years. The existing practice is to do this, however there is

no procedure or scheduling document that designates which tubes to be tested or the interval.

The model work order for this activity designates the performance frequency as required.

Performance is currently based on history, component engineer knowledge and budget. In

both cases, current practices provide adequate monitoring of the heat exchangers material

condition, however, the aging management program description is inconsistent with the existing

and proposed activities.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate historic reviews of plant

specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects. The Applicant had

provided adequate guidance to ensure aging effects will be appropriately managed. As

implemented, with the minor exception noted, there is reasonable assurance that the intended

function of the fluid systems will be maintained through the period of extended operation.

9

12. Preventive Maintenance Activities - Carbon Steel Coatings Inspections

The preventive maintenance activities credited as aging management programs include the

Condenser Circulating Water (RC) System Internal Coating Inspection and the Refueling Water

Storage Tank (FWST) Internal Coating Inspection. These are existing programs that manage

loss of material from carbon steel components by verifying the integrity of the internal protective

coating.

The RC internal coating inspection addressed two purposes for license renewal. One is to

manage the loss of material to the internal and external surfaces of the large diameter RC

intake and discharge piping. The other was to provide symptomatic evidence of the condition of

other piping systems in a similar underground environment. The RC coatings inspections are

conducted at a 5 year interval. Catawba is presently in the process of removal and re-

application of internal coating due to improper original application. The FWST internal coatings

inspection assures the continued presence of intact coating to preclude the loss of material to

the carbon steel tanks exposed to borated water. The McGuire tanks were last inspected in

1999 and some repairs were performed. The inspection frequency is 10 years. The Catawba

tanks are stainless steel tanks and aging effects are addressed by the Chemistry Control

Program and the Borated Water Systems Stainless Steel Inspection. The inspectors reviewed

the program and activity documentation including documentation of past inspections and

corrective actions.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate historic reviews of plant

specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects. The Applicant had

provided adequate guidance to ensure aging effects will be appropriately managed. As

implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the fluid systems will

be maintained through the period of extended operation.

13. Sump Pump Systems Inspection

The Sump Pump Systems Inspection is a new activity to perform a one time inspection to

characterize any loss of material to the internal and external surfaces of a limited set of

mechanical components exposed to sump environments. It will detect the presence and extent

of the loss of material due to crevice, general, pitting and microbiological induced corrosion.

The activity will inspect components at each site located in the Diesel Generator Room Sump

Pump System. This sump was selected as representative because it included all materials and

environments experienced by the other sump systems in the license renewal scope. The

inspection will use a volumetric examination technique to measure the parameter of wall

thickness to assess material loss.

The inspectors reviewed the inspection program and discussed the program with the

engineering staff. The LRA identified the actions items and criteria for the Sump Pump

Systems inspection. The inspections will be conducted prior to the end of the original operating

license.

There was no documentation of historic or plant specific and industry experience information to

determine aging effects for this equipment. The purpose of the inspection is to assess potential

aging effects. The Applicant had provided adequate guidance to ensure aging effects will be

appropriately assessed and managed. When implemented, there is reasonable assurance that

the intended function of the fluid systems will be maintained through the period of extended

operation.

10

14. Borated Water System Stainless Steel Inspection (BWSSSI)

The BWSSSI is a new activity to perform a one time inspection of stainless steel components

exposed to alternate wetting and drying of borated water, to characterize the potential aging

that may be occurring. The scope of the activity will focus on the Containment Spray (NS)

system but the results will also apply to subject components in the Refueling Water System.

The program description in the application specifically identifies 12 subject locations in the NS

system and states that one location at each station will be inspected and the results will be

applied to the relevant portions of the NS and Refueling Water System.

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation in the application, reviewed the draft

implementation plan for this program, and discussed the program with the engineering staff.

These one time inspections will be conducted prior to the end of the initial operating license for

each station.

The inspectors noted an item in the application which was unclear. The Refueling Water

System Aging Management Review, Table 3.2-6, credits the BWSSSI as an aging

management activity for the Refueling Water Storage Tanks at Catawba to assess the aging

effects of cracking and loss of material. The aging management program discussion for

BWSSSI (Section B.3.4) does not specifically state the tank is included and does not identify a

population of components in the Refueling Water System which are included as an alternate

wetting and drying borated water environment.

There was no documented information available for historic reviews regarding the aging effects

due to long term exposure of stainless steel to an alternate wetting and drying borated water

environment. The inspectors concluded that when these inspections are implemented, there is

reasonable assurance that the intended function of the fluid systems will be maintained through

the period of extended operation.

15. Selective Leaching Inspection

This is a new program being developed to perform a one-time inspection to characterize any

loss of material due to selective leaching of system components exposed to raw water

environments. Selective leaching (a form of galvanic corrosion) is the dissolution of one metal

in an alloy at the metal surface which leaves a weakened network of corrosion products that are

revealed by a Brinnell Hardness check or equivalent as reduction in material hardness.

Uncertainty exists as to whether long term exposure to raw water environments could cause

loss of material due to selective leaching in brass and cast iron components such that they may

lose their pressure boundary function in the period of extended operation. This one-time

inspection will examine brass and cast iron components exposed to raw water to detect the

presence and extent of any loss of material due to selective leaching.

The program will monitor the hardness of the wetted surface of cast iron pump casings and

brass valve bodies. The program will perform a Brinnell Hardness Test or equivalent on one

cast iron pump casing in the exterior fire protection system at each site. The Brinnell Hardness

Test or an equivalent test is most easily performed on a pump casing and will be indicative of all

cast iron components. The exterior fire protection system contains a raw water environment

that is susceptible to selective leaching and will be bounding for the other environments in the

other systems. The selective leaching inspection will also test a sample of brass valves at each

site in the interior fire protection system. Valves selected for inspection should be continuously

11

exposed to stagnant or low flow raw water environments. If no parameters are known that

would distinguish the susceptible locations at each site, a select set of susceptible locations will

be examined based on accessibility, operational, and radiological concerns. The results of this

inspection will be applied to the brass components exposed to raw water environments in other

systems. For McGuire, this new inspection will be completed following issuance of renewed

operating licenses for McGuire Nuclear Station and by June 12, 2021 (the end of the initial

license of McGuire Unit 1). For Catawba, this new inspection will be completed following

issuance of renewed operating licenses for Catawba Nuclear Station and by December 6, 2024

(the end of the initial license of Catawba Unit 1).

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation and discussed the program with the

engineering staff. The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate

historic reviews of plant specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects.

The Applicant had provided adequate guidance to ensure the aging effects will be appropriately

managed. When implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the

cast iron pump casings and brass valve bodies in the exterior and interior fire protection

systems will be maintained through the period of extended operation.

16. Treated Water Systems Stainless Steel Inspection

This is a new program being developed to perform a one-time inspection to characterize any

loss of material or cracking of stainless steel components resulting from exposure to

unmonitored treated water environments. An unmonitored treated water environment is one

that may contain conditions that can concentrate existing levels of contaminants or that may

simply start with a higher level of contaminants than those systems routinely monitored by the

chemistry control program. Examples of contaminants are halogens, sulfates, and dissolved

oxygen. Uncertainty exists as to whether exposure of stainless steel components located in an

unmonitored treated water environment could lead to loss of material or cracking such that

they may lose their pressure boundary function in the period of extended operation. This

activity will inspect stainless steel components to detect the presence and extent of any loss of

material or cracking.

The treated water systems stainless steel Inspection at McGuire will inspect stainless steel

components, welds, and heat affected zones, as applicable, in the McGuire nuclear solid waste

disposal system. The McGuire nuclear solid waste disposal system components within the

scope of license renewal are a mixture of unmonitored, treated water and spent resins sluiced

from demineralizers in various systems. The environment is expected to contain contaminants

in excess of the limits below which a concern would not exist for cracking and loss of material in

stainless steel. A concentration of any contaminants present would occur in areas of low flow

or stagnant conditions. As a result, inspections will be performed in stagnant and low flow lines

around the spent resin storage tanks using volumetric techniques. In addition to the volumetric

examination, a visual examination of the interior of a valve will be conducted to determine the

presence of pitting corrosion. The treated water systems stainless steel inspection at Catawba

will inspect stainless steel components, welds, and heat affected zones, as applicable, in the

drinking water system. The drinking water system receives water from the local municipality

that has contaminants in excess of limits below which a concern would not exist for cracking

and loss of material in stainless steel. Because of the higher starting level of contaminants, the

environment in the drinking water system is more likely to lead to cracking or loss of material if

it is occurring and bounds the environments of the containment valve injection water and solid

radwaste systems. In addition to the volumetric examination, a visual examination of the

interior of a valve will be conducted to determine the presence of pitting corrosion. Therefore,

12

the inspection results will serve as a leading indicator and can be applied to the containment

valve injection water and solid radwaste systems. For McGuire, this new inspection will be

completed following issuance of renewed operating licenses for McGuire Nuclear Station and

by June 12, 2021 (the end of the initial license of McGuire Unit 1). For Catawba, this new

inspection will be completed following issuance of renewed operating licenses for Catawba

Nuclear Station and by December 6, 2024 (the end of the initial license of Catawba Unit 1).

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation and discussed the program with the

engineering staff. The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate

historic reviews of plant specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects.

The Applicant had provided adequate guidance to ensure the aging effects will be appropriately

managed. When implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the

stainless steel piping in the systems addressed in previous paragraph will be maintained

through the period of extended operation.

17. Waste Gas System Inspection

This is a new program being developed to perform a one-time inspection to characterize loss of

material and cracking, due to general, crevice, or pitting corrosion in carbon steel, stainless

steel, and brass waste gas system components resulting from exposure to unmonitored treated

water and gas environments. Unmonitored treated water is condensation of the water vapor

contained in the waste gas stream and effluent from the recombiners and separators. The gas

environment is a combination of nitrogen, hydrogen, oxygen, and fission product gases.

Uncertainty exists as to whether exposure to these environments could cause loss of material

or cracking of the waste gas system components such that they may lose their pressure

boundary function in the period of extended operation. The waste gas system inspection will

use a volumetric technique to inspect four sets of material/environment combinations. As an

alternative, visual examination will be used should access to internal surfaces become

available.

(1) For the brass seal water control valves on the waste gas compressors at Catawba

exposed to unmonitored treated water, an inspection will be performed on one of the

two seal water control valves.

(2) For carbon steel components exposed to unmonitored treated water environments at

each site, inspections will be performed on the lower portions of decay tanks and

associated drain lines where condensate is likely to accumulate. One of eight possible

locations at each site will be examined.

(3) For stainless steel components exposed to unmonitored treated water environments

at each site, inspections will be performed on the seal water path of the waste gas

compressor. One of two possible locations at each site will be examined.

(4) For the carbon steel components exposed to a gas environment at each site, an

inspection will be performed on components within the scope of license renewal located

between the volume control tanks and the waste gas compressor phase separators.

For McGuire, this new inspection will be completed following issuance of renewed operating

licenses for McGuire Nuclear Station and by June 12, 2021 (the end of the initial license of

McGuire Unit 1). For Catawba, this new inspection will be completed following issuance of

13

renewed operating licenses for Catawba Nuclear Station and by December 6, 2024 (the end of

the initial license of Catawba Unit 1).

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation and discussed the program with the

engineering staff. The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate

historic reviews of plant specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects.

The Applicant had provided adequate guidance to ensure the aging effects will be appropriately

managed. When implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the

carbon steel, stainless steel, or brass components in the waste gas system will be maintained

through the period of extended operation.

18. Liquid Waste System Inspection

This is a new program being developed to perform a one-time inspection to characterize any

loss of material and cracking of system components within the scope of license renewal

exposed to unmonitored borated and treated water environments and raw water environments.

An unmonitored borated or treated water environment is one that may contain conditions that

can concentrate existing levels of contaminants and are not routinely monitored by the

chemistry control program. Uncertainty exists as to whether exposure to these environments

could lead to loss of material and cracking such that they may lose their pressure boundary

function in the period of extended operation. This activity will inspect system components in the

various environments to detect the presence and extent of any loss of material and cracking.

The liquid waste system Inspection is cast iron, stainless steel and carbon steel components

exposed to unmonitored treated and borated water environments or raw water environments in

the following McGuire and Catawba systems:

-

component cooling system (McGuire) - the portion of the component cooling system of

concern is the stainless steel waste evaporator package exposed to an unmonitored

treated water environment of the liquid waste recycle system;

-

liquid waste recycle system (McGuire) - stainless steel components exposed to an

unmonitored borated water environment;

-

liquid radwaste system (Catawba) - stainless steel components exposed to an

unmonitored borated water, unmonitored treated water, or a raw water environment;

carbon steel and cast iron components exposed to a raw water environment.

The liquid waste system inspection will use a volumetric technique to inspect the

material/environment combinations located in each system listed above. As an alternative,

visual examination will be used should access to internal surfaces become available. For

McGuire, this new inspection will be completed following issuance of renewed operating

licenses for McGuire Nuclear Station and by June 12, 2021 (the end of the initial license of

McGuire Unit 1). For Catawba, this new inspection will be completed following issuance of

renewed operating licenses for Catawba Nuclear Station and by December 6, 2024 (the end of

the initial license of Catawba Unit 1).

The inspectors reviewed the program documentation and discussed the program with the

engineering staff. The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate

historic reviews of plant specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects.

The Applicant had provided adequate guidance to ensure the aging effects will be appropriately

14

managed. When implemented, there is reasonable assurance that the intended function of the

cast iron, stainless steel and carbon steel components in the systems addressed in previous

paragraph will be maintained through the period of extended operation.

19. Fluid Leak Management Program

The Applicant credited the existing Fluid Leak Management Program for aging caused by leaks

from systems containing boric acid. This program, however, serves to manage all types of

leaks via identification, tracking and evaluations. Personnel who identify leaks by various

means are required to enter the information into the tracking system and notify appropriate

personnel. Other programs such as the chemistry program and service water inspections are

credited for aging management for non-boric acid fluid systems. The Applicant also plans to

enhance the Inspection Program for Civil Engineering Structures and Components to

periodically observe for affects of aging from various leaks on mechanical components such as

piping and valves as well as structures. In addition, the Applicant credited the system pressure

testing process, the reactor coolant system Mode 3 walkdowns, and non-licensed operator

observations for this program. The inspectors reviewed the Applicants procedures/directives

and specifications, reviewed selected proposed procedure changes, reviewed the leakage

program data base, and held discussions with Applicant personnel including program owners at

both sites.

In general, the program was thorough and viable. The inspectors noted, at Catawba, that a

new program had been recently developed (Catawba Nuclear Site Directive 3.11.4, Site

Materiel Condition) which would result in coordinated and documented observations for aging

effects such as might be evidenced or caused by leaks. Therefore, this document would be an

appropriate reference for the Fluid Leak Management Program.

The inspectors noted that the procedures for evaluation of boric acid effects did not clearly

cover electrical components which the Applicant had credited. The inspectors also noted that

the recent revision to the civil structures program (EDM-410) to incorporate mechanical

components had not clearly covered acceptance criteria and personnel qualifications for

mechanical components. The Applicant stated that appropriate changes would be initiated to

address these observations.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure that

aging effects will be appropriately managed via the Fluid Leak Management Program. When

implemented as described, there is reasonable assurance that intended functions of SSCs will

be maintained through the period of extended operation, in part, via this program.

20. Boraflex Monitoring Program (McGuire Only)

The Applicant credited the existing Boraflex Monitoring Program at McGuire for aging

management of the boraflex panels in the spent fuel storage racks. Catawba does not have

boraflex. The program monitors areal density of the panels and also monitors silica levels in

the spent fuel pool. The inspectors reviewed the Applicants procedures, reviewed recent areal

density test results, reviewed silica trends, reviewed a recent fuel pool calculation, and

discussed the program with Applicant personnel.

The inspectors noted that degradation will require changes to the fuel pool racks in the future,

however, when implemented as described, there is reasonable assurance that boraflex

degradation will be effectively managed through the period of extended operation.

15

21. Divider Barrier Seal Inspection and Testing Program

The Applicant credited the existing seal inspection program and associated procedures for

managing cracking and change in material properties of the divider barrier seal in each

containment and other elastomer pressure seals in containment. The program provides for

visual inspections of the seals and tensile testing of the divider barrier seal. The inspectors

reviewed applicable procedures and recent inspection and test results.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure that

aging effects will be appropriately managed via the inspections. The program provides a

reasonable assurance that intended functions of the seals will be maintained through the period

of extended operation.

22. Galvanic Susceptibility Inspection

The Applicant plans to develop a one time inspection of a sample of locations where different

materials are connected, concentrating on carbon steel/stainless steel combinations in raw

water environments. The inspectors discussed with the responsible engineer the process by

which samples and inspection techniques will be selected. The inspectors concluded that the

Applicant had adequate plans to assure that aging effects due to galvanic corrosion will be

appropriately managed.

23. Ice Condenser Inspections

The Applicant credited the existing ice basket inspection and ice condenser engineering

inspection for managing aging of the ice condenser. The ice basket inspection consists of the

Technical Specification Surveillance inspection of two baskets in each azimuthal group and

basket inspections performed during refueling outages. The engineering inspection provides

for a visual inspection of structural components in the upper plenum, lower plenum, and top

deck blankets. The inspectors reviewed Applicant procedures and recent inspection results.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure that

aging effects of the ice condenser will be appropriately managed via the inspections. The

inspections provide reasonable assurance that the intended functions of the ice condenser

affected by aging will be maintained through the period of extended operation.

24. Thermal Fatigue Management Program

The Applicant plans to utilize established procedures to monitor selected transients to confirm

that fatigue cycles do not exceed the maximum established by analyses for the 60 year period.

The inspectors reviewed the Applicants procedures for counting transients, reviewed

engineering documents, reviewed selected results of transient cycle counting, reviewed the

UFSAR, and held discussions with Applicant personnel. During the review, the inspectors

noted that all documents did not agree relative to which transients to count and the allowable

frequency for several transients. The Applicant stated that these problems were identified

during their review and PIPs had been generated to affect corrective action. The inspectors

also reviewed these PIPs. No transients were noted that were near the allowable frequency.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure that

aging effects will be appropriately managed via the thermal fatigue management program.

When implemented as described, there is reasonable assurance that the intended functions of

16

systems and components relative to fatigue monitoring will be maintained through the period of

extended operation.

25. Reactor Coolant System (NC) Operational Leakage Monitoring Program

The Applicant credited the established program for detecting operational leakage in accordance

with Technical Specifications as a second line of defense against aging effects that may result

in leakage such as cracking or loss of mechanical closure. Leakage is monitored by a periodic

leakage calculation as well as measurement of Containment floor and equipment sump level,

measurement of condensate drain tank level change, and radioactivity monitoring of

containment and secondary systems. The inspectors reviewed Applicant procedures,

engineering guidance, and recent leakage calculation results.

The inspectors concluded that the NC Operational Leakage Monitoring Program contains

adequate guidance to provide an additional line of defense for aging caused leakage. The

program will provide additional assurance that the NC will remain functional during the period of

extended operation.

26. Service Water Piping Corrosion Program

The Applicant credited the existing Service Water Piping Corrosion Program for managing loss

of material in raw water systems. The program is credited for components in the Containment

Ventilation Cooling System, Exterior and Interior Fire Protection Systems, Nuclear Service

Water System (RN), and heat exchanger sub-components in the Containment Spray System,

Control Area Chilled Water System, and Diesel Generator Systems. Sample points have been

selected for ultrasonic testing in the RN system with various flow regimes. Corrosion rates are

trended for predictions of degradation. Additional stress analysis has been performed in some

cases to refine acceptance criteria and extend the life of some piping sections. In addition,

methods such as walkdowns, operator rounds, system testing, and maintenance activities serve

to identify through wall leaks. The Applicant plans to trend these leaks. The Applicant also

plans to remove an approximately 20-foot degraded portion of Unit 1, train A underground RN

piping at Catawba for evaluation. The RN system was considered the worst case indicator for

degradation. The Catawba station has been susceptible to general corrosion and

microbiologically-influenced corrosion (MIC) due to raw lake water chemistry. The Applicant

plans to add sample points in the fire protection system at Catawba. Historically, Catawba

experienced significant fouling in non-safety related systems and in the supply to the Auxiliary

Feedwater System (AFW), discovered by observations of decreased flows. Additional

management was applied to raw water systems via a special project. This resulted in cleaning

of safety related portions of RN and replacement of non-safety related piping and selected

safety related piping including the AFW. This project is ongoing. The inspectors reviewed

associated engineering documents, reviewed procedures, reviewed ultrasonic test data basis,

and held discussions with responsible engineering personnel.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure that

loss of material in raw water systems will be adequately managed via the Service Water Piping

Corrosion Program. The existing program with enhancements will provide reasonable

assurance that the intended functions of the systems will be maintained through the period of

extended operation.

17

27. Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Inspection

The Applicant credited the existing Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Inspection

Program performed in accordance with site Technical Specifications for management of

cracking and loss of material. The inspection includes the upstream and downstream slopes,

the spillway overflow/outlet, the right and left abutments, and the toe of the dam. The program

requires visual examination for erosion, settlement, slope stability, seepage, drainage system

condition, integrity of rip-rap, and environmental conditions. In addition, the Applicant performs

piezometric readings and settlement monitoring via surveys. Piezometer readings are trended.

The inspectors reviewed applicable procedures and recent inspection results.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure that

aging effects of the dams will be appropriately managed. The program provides reasonable

assurance that intended functions of the dams will be maintained through the period of

extended operation.

28. Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Volume Program (Catawba only)

The Applicant has determined that the existing program for managing sedimentation is

appropriate to credit for the RN pond at Catawba only. The program consists of a topographic

survey of the pond at least every five years. Calculations of pond volume are performed based

on the survey. The inspectors reviewed the applicable procedure and recent survey results.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to assure the

sedimentation aging effects will be appropriately managed via the inspections. The program

provides reasonable assurance that the intended function of the RN pond will be maintained

relative to sedimentation through the period of extended operation.

29. Pressurizer Spray Head Examination

Based on an NRC Request for Additional Information No. 2.3.2.7 in a letter dated January 23,

2002; the Applicant indicated that a one time examination of the pressurizer spray head would

be performed. The Applicant plans to inspect the unit with the most hours of operation. Details

of this examination are yet to be developed. The inspectors held discussions with responsible

engineering personnel concerning the intended planning for the examination and reviewed the

Applicants Oconee Station implementation tracking document for a similarly planned

examination. The inspectors concluded that the Applicant appears to have adequate planning

initiated to assure the inspection will be performed.

B. Review of Electrical Equipment Aging Management Programs

1. Non - EQ Insulated Cables and Connections Aging Management Program

This is a new AMP that is yet to be developed. The Environmental Qualification (EQ) program

is a well established program to ensure that electrical components, such as cables, that may be

subject to a harsh environment are properly constructed to perform their intended function even

when subject to that harsh environment. This new program will perform periodic visual

inspections of accessible, i.e. able to be approached and viewed easily, non-EQ cables which

are in the scope of license renewal. The inspections will look for cable and connection jacket

surface anomalies such as embrittlement, discoloration, cracking, or surface contamination.

Such jacket surface anomalies are precursors of insulation aging degradation and may indicate

18

adverse localized equipment environments caused by heat or radiation which can accelerate

aging of electrical cables. These visual inspections are to be performed at least once every ten

years. The initial inspections are to be performed following the issuance of the renewed

operating licenses and prior to the end of the current operating license for Unit 1 at each site.

The Applicant had yet to develop inspection procedures for this AMP.

2. Inaccessible Non-EQ Medium Voltage Cables Aging Management Program

This is also a new AMP that is yet to be developed. The purpose of the AMP is to perform a

test on inaccessible, e.g. in conduit or direct buried, non-EQ medium voltage cables that are

exposed to significant moisture simultaneously with significant voltage. Significant moisture is

defined as exposure to long term, such as a few years, continuous standing water. Significant

voltage is defined as being energized for more than twenty-five percent of the time. The cables

are to be periodically tested to provide an indication of the condition of the conductor insulation

and the ability of the cable to perform its intended function. The actual type of test has yet to

be determined. The initial tests are to be performed following the issuance of the renewed

operating licenses and prior to the end of the current operating license for unit 1 at each site.

The tests will be repeated with a 10 year frequency. The Applicant had yet to develop

inspection procedures for this AMP.

3. Applicant Response to Station Blackout Issue

On April 1, 2002 NRC issued a memo to the industry informing them of the NRC staff position

on the license renewal rule 10 CFR 54.4 as it relates to the Station Blackout (SBO) rule 10 CFR 50.63. The position holds that the plant system portion of the offsite power system that is used

to connect the plant to the off site power source should be included in the scope of license

renewal. This is necessary because this is the power path that would be used to recover from a

SBO. The Applicant is aware of the position and has agreed to adjust their programs to

address the position. For McGuire and Catawba this resulted in adding components as subject

to aging management review. Isolated-phase bus installed to connect the unit generator to the

Unit Main Power System and nonsegregated-phase bus installed to connect the auxiliary power

transformers to the Normal Auxiliary Power Systems are now in scope. Passive switchyard

commodities such as transmission conductors, switchyard bus, and high voltage insulators are

also in scope. The Applicant performed an aging management review on the additional

components and concluded that they will perform their function during the period of extended

operation and that no additional aging managemnt programs are needed for these components.

At both McGuire and Catawba inspectors reviewed plant drawings with Applicant engineers to

understand what additional electrical equipment will be brought into scope. The inspectors

examined accessible portions of the additional equipment with Applicant engineers and found it

in acceptable condition.

C. Review of Structural Aging Management Programs

1. Containment Inservice Inspection Plan -IWE

The Containment Inservice Inspection Plan - IWE is generally applicable to both the McGuire

and the Catawba Nuclear Stations, except as otherwise noted.

The inspection plan for McGuire, MC-1042-CISI-0001, McGuire Nuclear Station 1&2 First

Interval Containment Inservice Inspection Plan, Revision 2, 8/27/01 and for Catawba, CN-

19

1042-CISI-0001, Catawba Nuclear Station Containment Inservice Inspection Plan, Revision 3,

6/5/01 are generally developed to implement applicable requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a and

cover both IWE and IWF examinations. There are several relief requests submitted by Duke

and approved by the NRC. These relief requests are 98-GO-001, Request for relief from

performing visual, VT-3 examinations on seals and gaskets; 98-GO-002, Request for relief

from performing bolt torque or tension test for pressure retaining bolting; 98-GO-003, Request

for alternative to the visual, VT-1 and volumetric examination requirements for areas subject to

augmented examination, 98-GO-007, Request for alternative to the ultrasonic thickness

measurement requirement of IWE-2500(c)(4); and 00-GO-001, Request for alternative to the

VT-2 examination requirements of IWE-5240. The inspectors reviewed the inspection plans,

relief requests and approving SERs and found them satisfactory.

The inspectors reviewed the most recent McGuire containment inservice inspection results.

The inspections were performed for Unit 1 in 1999 and Unit 2 in 2002. In general, the

inspections found the containment structures acceptable. Enclosure 13.3 of PT/1/A/4200/044,

Procedure Process Record for Containment Structural Integrity Inspection of MNS Unit 1,

Revision 1, 2/15/99 indicated that in many places the moisture barriers were removed or are

going to be removed and cited that, in many places, the barriers are not needed. However, in

other places, the degraded moisture barriers were replaced or are going to be replaced. The

inspectors asked the Applicant why barriers are needed in some places and not others. The

Applicant replied that some of the moisture barriers were not required per design. During

construction, cork was placed between the steel containment and the concrete floors as

expansion spaces. Moisture barriers/sealing material was applied to prevent moisture intrusion.

In most the places, there was no trace of moisture at the time of inspection, therefore, the

moisture barriers are not necessary. The only places that moisture barriers are needed are the

containment wall and mat junction and near the fuel transfer canal. When the moisture

barrier/sealing material degraded, they cracked, shrunk, and separated from the containment.

In the process of separation, they took the containment coating with them and left the steel

containment bare with primer. The cork absorbed moisture when moisture was present and

caused the steel containment to rust. Problem Investigation Process (PIPs) C-95-01464 and C-

98-03567 documented this fact. The Applicant decided to remove the moisture barrier/sealing

material where it is not needed to prevent further damage to the steel containment. The

inspectors agreed with this approach.

During review of the Catawba containment inservice inspection records, the NRC inspectors

noted some very low thickness readings in the UT data, especially for Catawba Unit 2 (2EOC11

- Containment ISI Record, File #CN-1144.09, Record #005687). The IWE Code has a 10

percent below nominal allowance but Record #005678 contains many thickness readings lower

than the 10 percent allowable. The nominal thickness of the free standing steel containment is

0.75 inches and the lowest reading is 0.623 which is only 83.1% of the nominal thickness.

Inspection records showed that these readings were discovered during the 2EOC10

containment ISI. A PIP had been issued to investigate this concern.

PIP C-00-01555 was issued on 3/27/00 and indicated that 9 points had readings less than 90%

of the nominal thickness ranging from 89.7% to 83.1%. In according to IWE-3512.3, the

Applicant performed an engineering evaluation which declared these low readings acceptable.

The reason is that the low readings were all in the vicinity of welds and they were not caused by

degradation, rather by field grinding in preparation for field welding. Section 2.2.7 of

Specification No. CNS-1144.11-00-0001, Specification for Field Welding and Erection

Tolerances of Containment Vessel, Revision 7, 2/28/83 indicates that for 0.75 inch thick

cylindrical plate the acceptable minimum thickness could be as low as 0.650 inches. Even

20

though the two lowest readings of 0.623" and 0.640" are lower than the 0.650" allowed by the

field welding specification, PIP C-00-01555 concluded: Because the 2 thinnest readings of

0.623" and 0.640" are not significantly less than the allowable 0.650" thickness, it is not

warranted to perform a detailed calculation to confirm the acceptability of these locally thin

areas. The PIP further states: The condition of the containment vessel is considered

acceptable. In accordance with IWE-3122.4, these UT readings are not considered to be

indicative of degradation, and the conditions are considered non-structural and have no

adverse affect on the structural integrity of the containment. All areas examined during

2EOC10 are scheduled to be examined in accordance with IWE-2420(b) and (c), as required by

IWE 3122.4(b). The 2EOC11 UT record showed the exact same readings at the two thinnest

places to confirm the PIPs conclusion. The inspectors agreed with this conclusion.

2. Containment Leak Rate Testing Program

The Duke Containment Leak Rate Testing Program, as described in Section 4.26 of Appendix

B of the LRA and Section 5.52 of the Technical Specifications (TS), is established to fulfill the

10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B, Type A testing requirements. Section 5.5.2 of the TS also

specifies the maximum allowable containment leakage rate, La, to be 0.3% of containment air

weight per day. The acceptance criteria, as specified in Section 5.5.2.a of the TS, is less than

0.75La. As stated in the Containment Inservice Inspection Plan - IWE section of this report, the

Applicant has requested relief from performing certain inservice inspections and to use the

containment leak rate test to verify the integrity of seals and gaskets of Class MC pressure

retaining components and CC components (98-G-001), to verify the pressure retaining bolting

of Class MC pressure retaining components and Class CC components (98-GO-002), and to

satisfy the requirements of IWE-5221 following repairs, replacements, or modifications (00-GO-

001). Therefore, the containment ILRTs will assure not only the containment satisfies the

Appendix J requirements but also provide confirmation that these reliefs are validated.

Duke document PT/1/A/4200/001 A, Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test, Revision 19,

11/9/00 lists the step by step procedure to perform the ILRT. The inspectors reviewed the

results of the last ILRT of both plants and found they are all within the allowable. The McGuire

ILRT shows that Unit 1 was 0.1482 wt%/day and Unit 2 was 0.1469 wt%/day. Catawba unit 1

was 0.0965 wt%/day and Catawba Unit 2 was 0.0906 wt%/day. They are all well below the

acceptance criteria of 0.225 wt%/day (0.75 x 0.3 wt%/day). The inspectors concluded that the

McGuire and Catawba ILRT demonstrated that the containments of all four units are in good

operable condition.

3. Flood Barrier Inspection (McGuire)

The flood barrier inspection program is plant specific and is for McGuire only. This program

uses a model work order, WO 93045301. The flood barriers to be inspected are internal flood

barriers. They are:

a.

Doorway curbs around rooms 500, 501, 502, and 503 for deterioration and

damage. Initiate repair if necessary. Curbs are shown on Drawing (DWG) MC-

1221-01.

b.

Curbs at diesel generator room entrance doors at EL 739' for deterioration and

damage. Curbs are shown on DWG MC-1170-01.

21

c.

Sealed walls and penetrations between Auxiliary Building and Interior and

Exterior Doghouses at or below EL 755 - 3".

d.

Electrical and mechanical piping sleeves to ensure penetrations would give

adequate flood protection. Penetrations are shown on DWGs MC-1220-215 and

MC-1220-147.

e.

Expansion joint along floor at Reactor Building wall for proper flood protection.

f.

Sealed wall penetrations along column line AA on Els 733 and 750 from column

line 40 to column line 56.

g.

Electrical/Mechanical pipe sleeves, cable tray openings, personnel access

openings, pipe trenches, and equipment/personnel access openings for

adequate flood protection, initiate repair W/R if necessary. Penetrations are

shown on DWGs MC-1220-97 and MC-1220-98.

The inspectors reviewed McGuire Drawings MC-1220-97, Auxiliary Building - Units 1&2 Flood

Protection Wall Elevation, Revision 14, 2/22/02 and MC-1220-98, Auxiliary Building - Units

1&2 Flood Protection Penetration Schedule & Details, Revision 20, 4/30/02 which depict the

locations of flood protection barriers listed in Item g. above.

The inspectors also reviewed WO 98208190 which reported the results of the April, 2000 flood

barrier inspection of McGuire Unit 1. Only three minor observances were found and work

requests (W/R) were generated to have them corrected or repaired. W/R 98124570 was

generated to caulk the leak around door PD-3; W/R 98124574 was generated to tighten door

801E against the seal to form a flood tight barrier; and W/R 98124557 was generated to repair

the torn boots around penetrations 40 & 42. All other flood barriers inspected were in good

condition. The inspectors agreed with the Applicants assessment.

4. Inspection Program for Civil Engineering Structures and Components

Engineering Directives Manual, EDM - 410, Inspection Program for Civil Engineering

Structures and Components, Revision 8, 2/27/02 specifies the purpose of the document is to

provide a program for monitoring and assessing civil engineering structures and components

and their condition in order to provide assurance that they are capable of performing their

intended functions. The scope of the program includes all structures and components that are

within both the license renewal and maintenance rules. Table 410-2 lists all structures

subjected to the structural inspection program for both McGuire and Catawba Nuclear Stations.

Section 410.4.7 lists the qualifications of inspectors and evaluators and Section 410.4.8 lists the

inspection frequency to be every 5 years.

The inspectors reviewed the reports of the most recent civil structural inspection performed for

McGuire and Catawba and found that, even though the steel containment and the reactor

building shell are not covered by this program, the Duke inspector did performed visual

inspection on them, as part of their respective inspections. The steel containment is under the

ISI IWE inspection and the reactor building shell is under the Technical Specification SR 3.6.16.3 visual inspection programs.

The McGuire civil structural inspection was performed in 1997 and documented in File No. MC-

1462.00, McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1&2 1997 Inspection report for Civil Engineering

22

Structures and Components per EDM -410, 2/15/98. Section 2 of the report concludes that the

structures and components are capable of performing their intended function, including the

protection or support of nuclear safety-related systems or components. The report further

concludes that several degraded conditions were minor and do not affect the integrity of the

subject structure. All findings have been addressed via PIPs or by station W/Rs. Table 1 of the

report documents the structures and components that are inspected. Table 2 of the report lists

all the findings of that inspection. All findings are classified as acceptable, however, PIPs and

W/Rs were issued to address the findings and Attachment II of the report lists the appropriate

resolutions.

At McGuire the inspectors walked down the intake structure which houses the non-safety

related CCW pumps and the fire protection pumps. The CCW pumps are located in open air

on the upper level while the fire protection pumps are housed in the lower cubicles. The

inspectors also walked down the Nuclear Service water Pond Dam. The inspectors agreed with

the Applicants assessment from the 1997 inspection report.

The Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1&2 were inspected between March 1997 and October

1998 and the results were documented in File No. CN-1642.00, Catawba Nuclear Station,

Units 1&2 1997-1998 Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures and Components, 10/13/98.

The summary report was issued 10/26/98 to list all recommendations to change the frequencies

of certain inspections to less than the normal frequency of five years.

The inspection revealed some bare spots inside the containment and issued work order (WO)

98023443 to repair them. The inspection also found trench covers were damaged or crushed

and WOs. 98044583 and 98046481 were issued to repair them. Based on the degree of

damage to the concrete covers, the Duke inspector recommended that the frequency to inspect

the trench covers should be every two years rather than the normal frequency of every five

years.

At Catawba the inspectors walked down the Low Pressure Intake Structure where the fire

pumps are located. The intake structure also houses the CCW (non-safety) pumps. The

inspectors visually inspected both the upper and lower level of the structure and found that the

structure itself is in good condition, however, there are some pipes that are in bad rusted

conditions. The inspectors also walked down the safety-related Nuclear Service Water Pump

House and found the above water portion of the trash rack and the structure is in good

condition. The Applicant informed the inspectors that the underwater inspection covers the

underwater portion of the trash racks and the structures.

5. Underwater Inspection of Nuclear Service Water Structures

The underwater inspection of nuclear service water structures for both McGuire and Catawba is

contained in a model work order 95065949, PM-Underwater Inspection of Raw Water

Structures, 8/22/95. The WO lists all steps necessary to perform the inspection.

The latest McGuire inspection was performed in June, 1999 by Eason Diving & Marine

Contractors, Inc. of Charleston, SC. The inspection covers the Low Level Intake Structure, the

Standby Nuclear Service Water (SNSW) Intake Structure, the SNSW Discharge Structure, the

CCW Intake Structure Wing Wall and Units 1&2 Discharge Structure as described in a letter

from the contractor dated 6/18/99. In the letter, the contractor describes that there was no

discrepancies found in all the underwater structures inspected, except some silt deposits. The

inspectors also reviewed reports from previous underwater inspections, by the same contractor,

23

and found there was a trash rack replaced for the Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Intake

Structure (WO 93033689) in 1993.

The latest Catawba underwater structure inspection was performed in April 2002 by Eason

Diving and Marine Construction, Inc. of Charleston, SC. The inspection covers the Nuclear

Service Water (NSW) Pond Intake Structure B train, NSW Overflow Structure (Inlet and

Outlet), NSW Lake Intake Structure, NSW Pump and Valve Room B train, NSW Dam, and

Short and Long Leg Discharge Structure to NSW Pond. The inspection report, written and

submitted to Duke on May 10, 2002 did not find any deficiencies. The only findings were some

silt deposit and several of the stainless trash rack anchor bolts were loose but still performing

their intended function. The inspectors agreed that the underwater part of the structures, both

McGuire and Catawba, are in good condition.

6. Technical Specification SR 3.6.16.3 Visual Inspection

The surveillance requirements of Section SR 3.6.16.3 of the Technical Specification (TS) of

both McGuire and Catawba states Verify reactor building structural integrity by performing a

visual inspection of the exposed interior and exterior surfaces of the reactor building. Along

with the Civil Engineering Structures and Components Inspection, this is the inspection to

assure the operability of the reactor building. The frequency of this inspection is three times

every 10 years, coinciding with the containment inservice inspection plan frequency.

Duke document PT/2/A/4200/078, Containment Structural Integrity Inspection, for Catawba

Unit 2 specifies that the purpose of the inspection is to verify by general visual inspection the

structural integrity of the steel containment vessel and reactor shield building in accordance

with 10CFR50, Appendix J, .... The 1998 inspection was documented in PT/2/A/4200/078, and

page 19 of Enclosure 13.3 indicated four abnormalities (hair line crack on the exterior surface of

the reactor building, minor rust staining on top of the parapet wall, etc.), but all were considered

acceptable.

PT/2/A/4200/044 documents the 2000 McGuire Unit 2 Structural Integrity Inspection results.

Pages 36 - 45 of Enclosure 13.3 documents the inspection findings of the reactor shield

building during the 1999-2000 inspection. On page 36, the document indicates that brown

staining was seen at ceiling expansion joints on the exterior wall. The inspector decided they

were old stains and were not active at the time of the inspection. The condition is acceptable.

Acceptable minor degradations were also documented on Pages 37, 40, 41, 42,, 43, 44, 45.

Enclosure 13.3 of PT/1/A/4200/044 documented the results of the Structural Integrity Inspection

of McGuire Unit 1. Pages 34 & 35 of the Enclosure indicated that leaching was observed in

several places on the exterior surface of the Unit 1 Reactor Shield Building and the Duke

inspector determined that the conditions were acceptable.

The McGuire Units 1&2 reactor building was visually inspected during the 1997 Civil

Engineering Structures and Components Inspection. The final report, entitled, McGuire

Nuclear Station Units 1&2 1997 Inspection Report for Civil Engineering Structures and

Components Per EDM-410 Maintenance Rule Program was issued on 2/15/98. Attachment

  1. 1 of the report lists the building parts that were inspected. Section 1 of Attachment #1

documents the exterior surface of the reactor building shield wall, Section 2 documents the

containment vessel exterior and the reactor building shield wall interior, and Section 3

documents the containment vessel interior. Attachment II lists all the findings for each section.

For section 1, the reactor building exterior, most findings are minor and need no actions. In

24

area 1.8 - reactor building dome, work order (WO) 97012413 was generated to repair

coating/sealants in a parapet area. The inspectors concluded, in the report cover letter, dated

2/15/98, that none of the findings were judged to adversely affect structural integrity and were

classified as acceptable findings.

The 1997-1998 Catawba Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures and Components also

included visual inspections of the reactor buildings of both units. As documented in File No.

CN-1462.00, dated 10/13/98, Section 7.1 discusses the reactor building inspection but only

addressed the results of the reactor building internals. The reactor building shield walls were

not addressed. However, the inspector made some recommendations to change the

frequencies to monitor certain structures documented in a memorandum dated 10/26/98. The

memorandum also concluded that all the findings were considered to be acceptable. The NRC

inspectors agreed with these conclusions.

7. Crane Inspection Program

The Applicant plans to utilize the existing crane inspection program with modifications. The

program is intended to manage loss of material, which has been identified as an aging effect for

crane rails and girders during the period of extended operation. The program detects aging

effects through visual examination of the crane rails and girders. Inspection procedures for

cranes and hoists are identified in plant procedures and are in accordance with industry

standards, plant experience, and other industry experience. Each crane and hoist is subject to

several inspections. Prior to initial use, all new, reinstalled, altered, modified, extensively

repaired, and newly erected cranes are inspected and the results of the inspections are

documented. Additional inspections are conducted prior to crane operation, quarterly, and/or

annually depending on the specific crane or hoist. The inspection frequencies for the cranes

and hoists are based on the guidance provided by ANSI B30.2.0 and ANSI B30.16. The

inspectors reviewed the License Renewal Application, Appendix B, which described program

requirements, associated procedures, engineering documents, and recent evaluation results.

In addition, the inspectors held discussions with site and corporate program owners in this area

and walked down the fuel handling and spent fuel pool cranes to assess existing conditions.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant had conducted adequate historic reviews of plant

specific and industry experience information to determine aging effects. The Applicant had

established tracking items to assure implementation of proposed actions to support license

renewal and some procedures already had modifications outlined. In addition, the inspectors

concluded that the Applicant had provided adequate guidance to ensure that the aging effects

will be appropriately managed. When implemented as described, there is reasonable

assurance that the intended functions of the polar, fuel handling, and spent fuel pool cranes will

be maintained through the period of extended operation.

D. Fire Protection

During the previous Scoping and Screening inspection the inspectors observed that the license

renewal and plant design basis documents for McGuire and Catawba had differing, conflicting,

and sometimes vague definitions of the QA Condition 3 fire protection (FP) program, and the

basis for license renewal scoping of FP equipment was not clear. Therefore the inspectors

were unable to confirm that scoping and screening for FP systems and components had been

performed successfully in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4(a)(3). A number of RAIs had been

issued from NRR to Duke to resolve concerns pertaining to how much of the plant fire

protection equipment should be in scope for license renewal. As of the date of this inspection

25

the Applicant was still in disagreement with the NRR staff over how much of the plant fire

protection equipment should be in scope of license renewal.

During this inspection inspectors reviewed the past results of tests on fire protection equipment.

The LRA credits the Fire Protection Program to manage loss of material and fouling of fire

protection equipment such as sprinklers, fire hydrant piping loops and valves, and hose rack

valves. The Fire Protection Program credits existing plant surveillance procedures required by

Selected licensee Commitments (SLC) involving visual inspections to verify sprinkler condition

and performing flow tests and flushes of the system to verify that blockage of flow will not

prevent system function.

At McGuire inspectors reviewed the records of the following completed tests.

PT/1/A/4700/42 Tech Spec Fire Hose Station Valve Operability Test completed 3/3-4/01.

PT/2/A/4700/43 SLC Fire Hose Station Valve Operability Test completed 12/22-23/00.

MP/0/B/7700/051 Reactor Building Fire Hose Station Inspection completed for unit 2 3/12/02.

PT/0/A/4400/001E Fire Hydrant Operability Test and System Flush completed 2/8/02.

PT/2/A/4400/001L Fire Protection Containment Header Test completed 4/9/01.

PT/0/A/4400/001T Fire Protection System Auxiliary Building Flush and Flow Test completed

4/2/02.

At Catawba inspectors reviewed the records of the following completed tests.

PT/0/A/4400/001E Fire Hydrant Operability Test completed 7/1/02.

PT/0/A/4400/01S RY Fire Protection Flow Periodic Test completed 8/11/97.

PT/0/A/4400/001X Essential Area Sprinkler Alarm System Test completed 6/19/02.

PT/0/A/4400/01J Spray Valve Sprinkler System Periodic Test portions completed 10/16/01 and

5/11/02.

PT/0/A/4400/01W Valve Operability and Water Availability Visual Inspection completed 8/16/00.

The records reviewed appeared acceptable. At Catawba, the inspectors noted that the RY Fire

Protection Flow Periodic Test had exceeded its three year test frequency. Applicant engineers

explained that the test could not be completed when last attempted in April 2001 due to a

buried valve that would not completely close. The inspectors reviewed two PIPs, C-01-01612

and C-01-01954 which documented the problem. The temporary solution has been to tag the

valve open, its normal position, and declare the fire protection system Operable But Degraded

until the valve can be repaired.

At Catawba, the inspectors noted that the test results from the Valve Operability and Water

Availability Visual Inspection contained numerous entries remarking on dirty water and debris

coming out of hose stations during flushes. Applicant engineers explained that fire water

comes directly from the lake and contains much silt and debris so it is a continual challenge to

keep the system flushed.

A second part of the fire protection AMP is the Fire Barrier Inspections program which credits

existing plant surveillance procedures. Those procedures are required by SLC 16.9.5 and

periodically require visual inspection of fire barriers to detect loss of material due to corrosion of

fire doors, cracking of fire walls, and cracking/delamination and separation of fire barrier

penetration seals. The inspectors reviewed records of recent performance of the surveillance

procedures to determine success of the program.

26

At McGuire inspectors reviewed the following records.

PT/0/A/4250/004 Periodic Inspection of Fire Barriers

Fire Barrier Penetrations Seal Inspection Checklist unit 2 completed 1/7-21/02

Fire Barrier Penetrations Seal Inspection Checklist unit 1 completed 10/8-11/6/01

Fire Door Inspection completed 3/26-4/8/02

The records reviewed appeared acceptable. Subsequently during this inspection, inspectors

learned that the Applicant discovered at McGuire on 7/15/02 that a portion of this PT had

apparently not been performed since 1990. PIP number M-02-03466 was initiated by the

Applicant. It states that in 1990 one large surveillance was changed to be implemented by

several model work orders but no model work order was created for the portion that requires a

visual inspection of the exposed surfaces of each required fire rated assembly on a 18 month

frequency, thus the inspection was not being performed.

At Catawba on 7/17/2002, the Applicant discovered that workers were not completing

procedure documentation for fire door inspections and fire boundary inspections. The

inspectors reviewed PIP number C-02-03943 which documented the problem. The inspectors

were shown computerized work order records for performance of portions of test

PT/0/A/4200/048 Periodic Inspection of Fire Barriers and Related Structures. The work orders

indicated that portions of the test were performed 7/19/01, 9/13/01, 12/12/01, and 3/5/02. The

inspectors agreed with the PIP which states that the tests were being done by Applicant staff

but were not being documented as required on the PT forms.

The inspectors concluded that the Applicant was implementing periodic surveillances for fire

protection equipment. However there have been instances of failure to perform tests and

failure to properly document tests.

E. Visual Observations of Plant Equipment

During the inspection, the inspectors performed walkdown inspections of plant systems,

structures, and components (SSCs), and electrical cable to observe material condition and

inspect for aging conditions that might not previously have been recognized and addressed in

the LRA. Portions of the following systems and structures were included:

McGuire and Catawba

Component Cooling (KC)

Main Steam (SM) including PORVs and Safeties

Feedwater (CF)

Auxiliary Feedwater (CA)

Main Steam Auxiliary Equipment (SA) Steam Generator Blowdown (BB)

Fuel Pit Cooling (FC)

Turbine Exhaust (TE)

Feedwater Turbine Hydraulic Oil (LP) Spent Fuel Cooling (KF)

Main Steam Vent to Atmosphere (SV) Feedwater Turbine Lube Oil (LF)

Containment Spray System (NS) Chemical & Volume Control System (NV)

Nuclear Service Water System (RN) Recirculated Cooling Water (KR)

Residual Heat Removal System (ND) Safety Injection System (NI)

Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam

Service Water Intake Structures

In addition, during recent refueling outages, NRC inspectors performed visual inspections of

equipment inside the McGuire Unit 2 and Catawba Unit 1 containments to assess material

27

condition and inspect for aging mechanisms that might not have been accounted for in the LRA.

The inspection details for McGuire Unit 2 are documented in NRC Inspection Report 50-

369,370/2002-05. On May 7, 2002, during the Catawba Unit 1 refueling outage, an inspector

performed walkdown inspections of accessible portions of plant systems, components,

structures and electrical cable inside of containment. Material condition of equipment and

structures inside of Unit 1 Containment was generally good and no aging mechanisms were

identified that were not accounted for the in Applicants License Renewal Program. The

inspector noted a minor buildup of boric acid residue and rust on some cable armor which was

followed up by the licensee and corrected. The following is a partial list of Catawba Unit 1

components and structures observed:

Cold Leg Accumulators, valves, and piping

Safety Injection lines and valves

AFW lines and penetrations

Reactor Coolant pumps base and supports

RC loop stop valves and check valves

Main Steam lines

Main Feedwater lines

Inner containment liner and coatings

biological wall structure

top of Pressurizer

Pressurizer spray valve piping

RCP seal piping

The observations of general material conditions included: inspection of piping components for

evidence of leaks or corrosion, inspection of coatings (piping, tanks, and structural

components), and inspection of electrical cable for indications of deterioration.

In general, the material condition at McGuire and Catawba was very good and no aging

management issues were identified. Coatings were in good condition and only a few minor

leaks were noted. In general, the minor leaks were captured in the Leak Management Program.

At McGuire, inspectors observed one leak on a containment spray pump that was not included

in the Leak Management Program. Engineers promptly initiated a work request to address the

issue. The inspectors did note the following material conditions that were in contrast to the very

good overall conditions:

The coatings on KC System supply and return piping to the McGuire Units 1 and 2 train B RHR

heat exchangers had deteriorated due to condensation. This deterioration of coatings and

continuous condensation had resulted in areas of surface rust. The condition appeared to be

superficial and thus was not considered to be an operability concern. However, the condition

was in contrast to the good condition of the remainder of the KC System piping in the McGuire

and Catawba Units.

Poor housekeeping conditions were noted on the bottom floors of the Catawba Units 1 and 2

interior Main Steam Doghouses.

During the tour of the lower levels of the RN pump house at Catawba, some external corrosion

was observed on RN piping which exceeded that observed in other portions of the plant.

Corrosion areas were observed which exhibited flaking and some depth. These corrosion

areas were aggravated by an improperly routed pump seal leakoff line which resulted in water

constantly splashing onto the piping. During the inspection, the Applicant cleaned the worst

28

areas observed and conducted ultrasonic wall thickness measurements. In each case the wall

thickness was well above design minimum thickness. Further review of plant records disclosed

that the Applicant had identified the same condition as potentially significant corrosion in

December, 1998 on a PIP No. C-98-04719. Also, in August, 2000; the Applicant had identified

a pump leak that was causing corrosion that needed to be corrected (PIP No. C-00-04315).

The Applicant stated that past corrective actions did not meet management expectations in that

these problems had not been appropriately pursued in a timely manner.

At McGuire, the inspectors walked down the portion of the Recirculated Cooling Water System

which had been inadvertently left out of scope as described in NRC Inspection Report 50-369,

370/2002-005. The inspectors confirmed that the appropriate portion of this system had been

added to the LR scope and the application had been updated via letter dated June 25, 2002.

F. Future Implementation of License Renewal Commitments

During the inspection the Applicant made a presentation to the inspectors describing the plans

for future implementation of procedure changes and other license renewal commitments. The

Applicant provided draft specifications MCS-1274.00-00-0016, McGuire License Renewal

Commitments, Revision 0 and CNS-1274.00-00-0016, Catawba License Renewal

Commitments, Revision 0 which are the documents controlling the implementation process. In

addition, completed or partially completed implementation packages for a number of Aging

Management Programs were provided for the inspectors review. Based on review of these

documents and discussions with Applicant personnel, the inspectors concluded that the

Applicant has a good implementation plan that, if completed as described, should ensure

proper implementation of license renewal commitments.

III.

Conclusions

The inspection concluded that the existing aging management programs are generally being

conducted as described in the License Renewal Application and that plans for new aging

management programs appear acceptable to manage plant aging.

The inspection concluded that the material condition of both the McGuire and Catawba plant is

very good with minor exceptions observed in isolated areas.

Exit Meeting Summary

The results of this inspection were discussed on July 26, 2002 with members of the Applicants

staff in an exit meeting open for public observation at the Duke Energy Corporation offices.

The Applicant acknowledged the findings presented and presented no dissenting comments.

During the exit meeting the inspectors asked the licensee whether any of the material examined

during the inspection should be considered proprietary. Applicant representatives replied that

no proprietary material was reviewed during the inspection.

29

ATTACHMENT 1

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTED

Applicant

S. Chu, License Renewal Engineer

T. Cox, License Renewal Engineer

P. Colaianni, License Renewal Engineer

G. Comer, License Renewal Engineer

R. Gill, License Renewal Manager

M. Haze Hine, License Renewal Engineer

D. Keiser, License Renewal Engineer

R. Nader, License Renewal Engineer

G. Robison, License Renewal Manager

M. Semmler, License Renewal Engineer

T. Shiel, Duke Public Relations

NRC

R. Franovich, Licensing Project Manager, NRR

L. Reyes, Regional Administrator, RII

D. Roberts, Senior Resident Inspector, Catawba

S. Shaeffer, Senior Resident Inspector, McGuire

R. Taylor, Reactor Inspector

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

General License Renewal Documents

Application To Review the Operating Licenses for McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 and

Catawba Nuclear station Units 1 and 2

McGuire Nuclear Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 13

Catawba Nuclear Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 8

Safety Evaluation Report Related to the License Renewal of Oconee Nuclear Station Units 1,2,

&3, NUREG 1723, March 2000

DPS, CNS, MCS-1274.00-00-005, License Renewal Aging Management Programs and

Activities, Revision 0

MCS-1274.00-00-0007, Structures and Structural Components Screening and Aging

Management Review for License Renewal, Revision 1

30

CNS-1274.00-00-0007, Structures and Structural Components Screening and Aging

Management Review for License Renewal, Revision 1

MCS-1274.00-00-0016, McGuire License Renewal Commitments, Revision 0

CNS-1274.00-00-0016, Catawba License Renewal Commitments, Revision 0

Existing Plant Procedures and Programs

General

Catawba Technical Specification Units 1&2, Amendment 189/182

McGuire Technical Specification Units 1&2, Amendment 184/166

Inservice Inspection

Third Interval Inservice Inspection Plan McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 1 - General Requirements

and Volume 1, Revision 0

Second Interval Inservice Inspection Plan McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1 & 2 - General

Requirements and Volume 1, Revision 3

Catawba Nuclear Station Second Ten-Year Interval Inservice Inspection Plan

Inservice Inspection Pressure Test Plan - McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 1 - Third Inspection

Interval

QAL-15, Inservice Inspection (ISI) Visual Examination, VT-2, Pressure Test, Revision 19

McGuire MP/0/A/7650/076, Controlling Procedure for System Pressure Testing of ASME Piping

Systems

Catawba Inservice Inspection Pressure Test Plan, Revision 3

Catawba MP/0/A/7650/088, Controlling Procedure for Systems Pressure Testing of ASME

Section XI Duke Class A, B, and C Systems and Components, Revision 025

Framatome Procedure 54-ISI-364-00, Remote Under Water In-Vessel Visual Inspection of

Reactor Pressure Vessels, Vessel Internals, and Components in Pressurized Water Reactors,

Revision 00

FAC

DPC Engineering Support Document, Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program, Revision 3

McGuire Unit 1 Piping Erosion Control Program, Revision 11

McGuire Unit 2 Piping Erosion Control Program, Revision 11

31

McGuire MP/0/B/7700/103, Erosion/Corrosion Component Inspection, Revision 001

Catawba SM/0/B/8530/001, Flow Accelerated Corrosion Component Inspection, Revision 003

Reactor Vessel Integrity Program

Engineering Support Document Reactor Vessel Integrity Program, Revision 4

McGuire MP/0/7150/033, Irradiation Capsule Removal From Lower Internals, Revision 003

McGuire MP/0/A/7150/115, Irradiation Capsule Off-Site Shipment, Revision 002

Catawba MP/0/A/7150/085, Irradiation Capsule Removal From the Reactor Lower Internals,

Revision 4

WCAP-14799, Analysis of Capsule W From the Duke Power Company McGuire Unit 2 Reactor

Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program

WCAP-14993, Analysis of Capsule Y From the Duke Power Company McGuire Unit 1 Reactor

Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program

WCAP-15449, Evaluation of Pressurized Thermal Shock for Catawba and McGuire Units 1 &2

@ 54EFPY

WCAP-15117, Analysis of Capsule V and the Dosimeters for Capsules U and X from Duke

Power Company Catawba Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program

WCAP-15243, Analysis of Capsule V and the Capsule Y Dosimeters from the Duke Energy

Catawba Unit 2 Reactor Vessel Radiation Surveillance Program

WCAP 15285, Catawba Unit 2 Heatup and Cooldown Curves for Normal Operation Using Code

Case N-460

WCAP-15448, Catawba Unit 1 Heatup and Cooldown Curves for Normal Operation Using Code

Case N-460 for 51 EFPY

MP/0/A/7150, Vessel Cavity Dosimetry Capsule Removal and Installation

Steam Generator Surveillance

Steam Generator Management Program, Revision 4

Thimble Tube Inspection Program

Calculation MCC-1553.0-00-0014, Incore Instrumentation Thimble Tube Wear Review, Revision

3

Calculation CAC-1553.03-00-007 Catawba 1 ECT Results and Actions Required, Revision 2

Calculation CAC-1553.03-00-0011, Catawba 2 ECT Results and Actions Required, Revision 3

32

PT/0/A/4550/034, Incore Detection Thimble Eddy Current Testing, Revision 002

NBE-715, Multifrequency Eddy Current Examination of Flux Thimble Tubing at Catawba and

McGuire Nuclear Stations, Revision 0

NBE-716, Evaluation of Eddy Current Data for Flux Thimble Tubing at Catawba and McGuire

Nuclear Stations, Revision 0

Chemistry

Catawba (CNS) Chemistry Management Procedure 3.4.17.1, Primary Chemistry, Rev. 43

Catawba (CNS) Chemistry Management Procedure 3.4.17.6, Closed Cooling (HVAC) Systems,

Rev.25

Catawba (CNS) Chemistry Management Procedure 3.4.17.2, Secondary Chemistry, Rev. 26

Catawba (CNS) Chemistry Management Procedure 3.4.17.5, Oil Systems, Rev 10

McGuire (MNS) Chemistry Manual Section 3.6, Closed Cooling Systems Analytical

Requirements and Corrective actions, Rev. 16

McGuire (MNS) Chemistry Manual Section 3.7, Chemistry Sample Collection and

Specifications, Rev. 8

McGuire (MNS) Chemistry Manual Section 3.4, Water Treatment Systems Analytical

Requirements and Corrective Actions, Rev. 13

McGuire (MNS) Chemistry Manual Section 3.2, Secondary Systems Analytical Requirements

and Corrective Actions, Rev. 23

McGuire (MNS) Chemistry Manual Section 3.1, Primary Analytical Requirements and Corrective

Actions, Rev. 12

Cranes

NSD 104 Nuclear Policy Manual - Materiel Condition/Housekeeping, Cleanliness/Foreign

Material

Duke Power Company Lifting Program, Rev. 5

MP/0/B/7650/007 Annual Inspection of Electric, Air Operated, and Hand Operated Hoists, Rev.

8

MP/0/A/7150/110 Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM) Missile Shield Lifting Rig Inspection,

Rev. 2

MP/0/A/7150/111 NC Pump Motor Lifting Rig Inspection, Rev. 1

MP/0/A/7150/136 Inspection of Reactor Vessel Head and Internals Lift Rigs, Rev. 0

33

MP/0/A/7650/085 Load Path in Ice Condenser, Rev. 1

IP/0/B/3262/001 Overhead Cranes and Hoists Electrical Inspection and Maintenance,

Rev. 4

MP/0/A/7700/096 Quarterly/Annual Inspection and Servicing of Overhead and Gantry Cranes,

Rev. 6

MP/1/A/7650/060 Operation of Polar Crane in Unit 1 Upper Containment, Rev. 16

MP/2/A/7650/116 Operation of Polar Crane in Unit 2 Upper Containment, Rev. 9

Batteries

Catawba IP/O/A/3710/008, Vital Battery and Terminal Inspection, Rev.17

Catawba IP/O/A/3710/018, Maintenance Procedure for SAFT Model SBM 227-2 and SBM 277-

2 Battery and Rack, Rev. 24

Catawba IP/O/B/3710/022/, 250/125 VDC SSF Auxiliary power System (ETM) Batteries

Periodic Inspection, Rev. 22

McGuire IP/O/A/3061/007, GNB Vital Battery and Terminal Post Inspection, Rev. 13

McGuire IP/0/A/3061/004F, DG Battery (NiCAD) Maintenance, Rev. 0

Heat Exchangers

Catawba PT/2/A/4400/006A, NS Heat Exchanger 2A Heat Capacity Test, Rev. 24

Catawba MP/O/A/7650/056, Heat Exchanger Corrective Maintenance, Rev. 19

Calculation CNC-1223.13-00-0002, Acceptable RN Flow and Fouling in the NS Heat

Exchangers for One RN Pump Operation, Rev. 5

Catawba PT/1/A/4400/006B, NS Heat Exchanger 1B Heat Capacity Test, Rev. 24

Catawba Predefined work order 98374380 01, NS Heat Exchanger B, Remove/Restore

Channel End Bell Cover, dated 7/17/00

McGuire PT/1/A/4208/010A, NS 1A Heat Exchanger Heat Balance Test, Rev 25

McGuire MCM 1301.02.0058-002, SSS Diesel Vendor Manual, dated 8/2/01

McGuire MP/0/A/7450/040, Control Room Chiller Condenser Corrective Maintenance, Rev. 7

McGuire MP/0/A/7450/036, Chemical Cleaning of Service Water System Piping and Heat

Exchanger, Rev 6

McGuire Model Work Order 98399233, Clean RN Side of NS 1A AHU

34

McGuire MP/0/A/7150/058, NV Pump American Standard Oil Coolers Corrective Maintenance,

Rev. 13

McGuire MP/0/A/7150/118, NI Pump American Standard Oil Cooler Corrective Maintenance,

Rev. 3

McGuire MP/0/A/7700/013, Component Cooling Heat Exchanger Corrective Maintenance, Rev.

6

McGuire PT/1/A/4350/032A, KD Heat Exchanger 1A RN Differential Pressure Test, Rev. 13

Structural

MC-1042-CISI-0001, McGuire Nuclear Station 1&2 First Interval Containment Inservice

Inspection Plan, Rev. 2

PT/1/A/4200/044, Procedure Process Record for Containment Structural Integrity of MNS Unit

1, Rev. 1

PT/2/A/4200/078, Containment Structural Integrity Inspection

EDM-410, Inspection Program for Civil Engineering Structures and Components, Rev. 8

MP/0/A/7700/031, McGuire Nuclear Station Flood Seal Installation and Repair, Rev. 8

IP/0/A/3090/010, Sealing Safety-Related Equipment Outside Containment and Doghouses,

Rev. 12

CN-1042-CISI-0001, Catawba Nuclear Station Containment Inservice Inspection Plan, Rev. 3

Model Work Order PM-Underwater Inspections of Raw Water Structures, July 11, 2002

PT/0/A/7700/093, Trenching and Excavation, Rev. 0

Model Work Order 93045301,PM/1XNA/Inspect Internal Flood Barriers, July 28, 2000

Work Order 98208190, Unit 1 Flood Barriers Inspection, April 3, 2000

PT/1/A/4200/001 Q, Penetration Leak Rate Test, Rev. 23

PT/2/A/4200/001 B, Electrical Penetration O-Ring Seal Leak Rate Test, Rev. 10, March 1, 2002

PT/2/A/4200/044, McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 2 - Containment Structural Integrity Inspection,

Rev. 2, September 29, 2000

PT/1/A/4200/001 A, Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test, Rev. 19

Fluid Leak Management

Nuclear System Directive (NSD)-413, Fluid Leak Management Program, Revision 1

35

NSD-513, Primary to Secondary Leak Monitoring Program, Revision 1

Catawba Nuclear Site Directive 3.11.4, Site Materiel Condition, Revision 0

Catawba PT/1/A/4150/001 H, Inside Containment Boric Acid Check, Revision 7

Catawba PT/2/A/4150/001 H, Inside Containment Boric Acid Check, Revision 7

Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage

McGuire PT/1/A/4150/001 D, Identifying NC System Leakage, Revision 5

McGuire PT/1/A/4150/001 B, Reactor Coolant System Calculation, Revision 46

Catawba PT/1/A/4150/001 D, NC System Leakage Calculation, Revision 43

Catawba PT/2/A/4150/001 D, NC System Leakage Calculation, Revision 47

Catawba PT/1/B/4600/028, Determination of Steam Generator Tube Leak Rate for Unit 1,

Revision 3

Catawba PT/2/B/4600/028, Determination of Steam Generator Tube Leak Rate for Unit 2,

Revision 3

Service Water Inspections

McGuire PT/0/B/4700/063, Periodic Inspection of Service Water Piping for Corrosion Induced

Thinning, Revision 3

Catawba PT/0/B/4600/026, Periodic Inspection for Corrosion Induced Wall Thinning, Revision 4

McGuire PT/0/A/4400/004, Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Inspection, Revision 7

Catawba PT/0/A/4400/004, Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Periodic Inspection,

Revision 20

Catawba PT/0/A/4600/015, Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Topographic Survey,

Revision 2

Fluid Leak Management

Catawba MP/0/A/7650/088; Controlling Procedure for Systems Pressure Testing of ASME

Section XI Duke Class A, B, and C Systems and Components, Revision 25

McGuire MP/0/A/7700/080; Inspection, Evaluation and Cleanup of Boric Acid on Alloy, Carbon

and Stainless Steel Components, Revision 5

Catawba MP/0/A/7650/040; Inspection, Evaluation and Cleanup of Boric Acid Spills on Alloy,

Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel Components, Revision 6

36

McGuire MP/0/A/7650/076, Controlling Procedure for System Pressure Testing of ASME Piping

Systems, Revision 11

McGuire Maintenance Directive 2.18, Control of the Mode 3 Full Temperature and Pressure

Walkdown, Revision 0

McGuire OMP 5-5, NLO Surveillance, Revision 12

Ice Condenser Inspections

McGuire SM/0/A/8510/002, Ice Basket Inspection, Revision 3

Catawba SM/0/A/8510/002, Ice Basket Inspection, Revision 6

Catawba SM/0/A/8510/007, Ice Basket Corrective Maintenance and Tracking, Revision 13

Various

Catawba Model Work Order 91005512, Inspect Underground Unit 1 RC System Piping, dated

6/6/97

Catawba Work Order 98278898, RC Blast-Recoat Inside of RC Piping, dated 11/4/01

McGuire Calculation MCL-1148.00-00-0048, Visual Inspection and Acceptance Criteria for the

Refueling Water Storage Tank (FWST), Rev. 1

McGuire PT/0/A/4550/036, SFP Storage Rack Boraflex Examination Controlling Procedure,

Revision 2

McGuire PT/0/A/4200/005, Divider Barrier Seal Inspection, Revision 8

Catawba PT/0/A/4200/042, Access Door and Hatch Seal Periodic Inspection and Replacement,

Revision 10

Catawba PT/0/A/4200/043, Divider Barrier Seal Inspection, Revision 5

Plant Engineering Procedure No. 3.04, Documentation of Allowable Operating Transient Cycles

(Catawba), Revision 2

Plant Records

Inservice Inspection Report Unit 1 McGuire 2001 Outage 7/EOC-14

Inservice Inspection Report Unit 2 McGuire 2002 Outage 6/EOC-14

Inservice Inspection Report Unit 1 Catawba 2000 Refueling Outage EOC12 (Outage 4)

Inservice Inspection report Catawba Unit 2 2001 Refueling Outage EOC11 (Outage 4)

McGuire Unit 1 Pressure Test Status Log, 2nd Interval

37

McGuire Unit 1 - 3rd Interval Pressure Testing Examination Zone Report

McGuire Unit 2 Pressure Test Status Log 2nd Interval

McGuire Completed Procedure MP/0/A/7650/076, Pressure Test 1A (2EOC14) (Item

B15.050.001)

Catawba Unit 2 Framatome RV 10-Year ISI - Visual Inspection Evaluation, 11/10/95

Completed MP/0/A/7650/088 for Catawba Unit 1 EOC 13

Completed MP/0/A/7650/088 for Catawba Unit 2 EOC 11

Completed Framatome Procedure 54-ISI-364-00, IVVI Inspection Data Sheet, McGuire Unit 1

ISI-EOC 14

McGuire Unit 1 EOC-14 Erosion Inspection Log

McGuire Unit 2 EOC-14 Erosion Inspection Log

McGuire Unit 1 Piping Erosion/Corrosion Inspection Program Data Base 5/23/2001

McGuire Unit 2 Piping Erosion/Corrosion Inspection Program Data Base 3/27/2002

Catawba Nuclear Station Unit 1 Flow Accelerated Corrosion Inspection Program Database,

7/11/2002

Catawba Nuclear Station Unit 2 Flow Accelerated Corrosion Inspection Program Database,

10/11/2001

Catawba FAC Inspection Program Health Report Unit 1 Cycle 12 through 1EOC12

Catawba FAC Inspection Program Health Report Unit 2 Cycle 11 through 2EOC11

Completed McGuire Unit 1 MP/0/A/7150/033, Irradiation Capsule Removal From the Reactor

Lower Internals 4/27/97

Completed Catawba Unit 1 MP/0/A/7150/085, Irradiation Capsule Removal From the Reactor

Lower Internals 12/6/97

Completed Catawba Unit 2 MP/0/A/7150/085, Irradiation Capsule Removal From the Reactor

Lower Internals 9/13/98

McGuire and Catawba Calculation DPC-1201.01-006, MCC-1201.01-00-0044, CNS-1201.01-

00-0020, USE and RTPTS Values for Reactor Vessel Nozzle Region Locations

McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 1 Steam Generator Outage Report 1EOC14, March 2001,

Including Attachments A through M

McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 2 Steam Generator Outage Report 2EOC14, March 2002,

Including Attachments A through L

38

Catawba Nuclear Station Steam Generator Maintenance Outage Summary Report, 1EOC-12,

File No. 208.20

Catawba Nuclear Station Steam Generator Maintenance Outage Summary Report 2EOC-10

Duke Engineering & Services SG Outage Summary Report for Catawba Nuclear station Unit 2

EOC 11, including Sludge Lance Report and SGMEP 105 Assessment of Potential Degradation

Mechanisms

Completed McGuire 1EOC14 (2001) PT/0/A/4550/034, Incore Detection Thimble Tube Eddy

Current Testing, including results

Completed McGuire 2EOC8 (1993) PT/0/A/4550/034, Incore Detection Thimble Tube Eddy

Current Testing, including results

Completed PT/0/A/4600/10, Incore Detector Thimble Eddy Current Testing - 9/30/98 (Catawba

2EOC9)

Completed NBE-715, Multifrequency Eddy Current Examination of Flux Thimble Tubing at

Catawba and McGuire Nuclear stations , Revision 0 - 9/30/98 (Catawba 2EOC9)

Catawba Unit 2 @EOC11, Containment ISI Record File # CN-1144.09, Record #005687,

CNS-1144.11-00-0001,Specification for Field Welding and Erection Tolerances of Containment

Vessel, Revision 7, February 27, 1983

PT/1/A/4200/01L, Catawba Nuclear Station Leak Rate Test Report Unit 1, November, 2000

PT/2/A/4200/01L, Catawba Nuclear Station Leak Rate Test Report Unit 2, February, 1993

File No. MC-1462.00, McGuire Nuclear Station Units 1&2 1997 Inspection report for Civil

Engineering Structures and Components per EDM -410, 2/15/98

File No. CN-1642.00, Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1&2 1997-1998 Inspection of Civil

Engineering Structures and Components, 10/13/98

Current Catawba and McGuire Station Fluid Leak Management Data Base for Active Leaks

Current Transient Cycle Data for Catawba and McGuire Stations

NET-158-01, Badger Test Campaign at McGuire Unit 1, Revision 0

NET-158-02, Badger Test Campaign at McGuire Unit 2, Revision 0

Work Order (WO) 98446789-01, Catawba 1 Inspect Barrier Seal

WO 98374805-01, Catawba 2 Inspect Divider Barriers

WO 98277323, Catawba 1 Remove/Replace CRDM Missile Shields

WO 98373468, Catawba 2 Remove/Replace CRDM Missile Shields

39

WO 98446797, Catawba 1 Remove/Replace Reactor Coolant Pump C Hatch

WO 98373480, Catawba 2 Remove/Replace Reactor Coolant Pump B Hatch

WO 95023567-01, Catawba 1 Inspect Equipment Hatch at Pressurizer Base

WO 97002629-01, Catawba 2 Inspect Equipment Hatch at Pressurizer Base

WO 98483507, Catawba 1 Remove/Replace Pressurizer Hatches

WO 98457108, Catawba 2 Remove/Replace Pressurizer Hatches

WO 94054584, Catawba 1 Inspect Pipe Chase Equipment Hatch

WO 96090788, Catawba 2, Inspect Pipe Chase Equipment Hatch

WO 98277014, Catawba 1 Inspect Emergency Hatch

WO 94054753, Catawba 2 Inspect Emergency Hatch

WO 95991812, Catawba 1 Steam Generator D Enclosure Manway

WO 97022560, Catawba 2 Steam Generator C & D Enclosure Manways

WO 98137581, Catawba 1 Steam Generator A Enclosure Manway

WO 98015392, Catawba 2 Steam Generator A Enclosure Manway

WO 98482515, Catawba 1 Ice Condenser Lower Access Door Seal

WO 98053873, Catawba 2 Ice Condenser Lower Access Door Seal

WO 97063057, Catawba 1 Inspect Incore Instrument Hatch

WO 98031975, Catawba 2 Inspect Incore Instrument Hatch

WO 98294398, McGuire 1 Inspect Divider Barrier Hatch Seal

WO 98479011, McGuire 1 Inspect Pressurizer Hatch Seal

WO 98294183, McGuire 1 Remove/Replace Reactor Coolant Pump A Hatch

WO 98294180, McGuire 1 Inspect CRDM Missile Shield Seals

WO 94019594, McGuire 1 Inspect Steam Generator A Manway

WO 98400544, McGuire 1 Inspect Submarine Hatch Seal

WO 98294393-02, McGuire 1 Divider Barrier Seal Inspection

WO 98410174-01, McGuire 2 Divider Barrier Seal Inspection

40

WO 98409999, McGuire 2 Remove/Replace Reactor Coolant Pump A Hatch

WO 98483233, McGuire 2 Inspect CRDM Missile Shield Seals

WO 97094010, McGuire 2 Inspect Steam Generator A Manway

WO 98410173, McGuire 2 Inspect Divider Barrier Hatch Seal

WO 98483592, McGuire 2 Inspect Pressurizer Hatch Seal

WO 98410172, McGuire 2 Inspect Submarine Hatch Seal

WO 85059218, McGuire 1 Ice Condenser Basket Inspection

WO 85058480, McGuire 2 Ice Condenser Basket Inspection

WO 98293709-01, Catawba 1 Perform Inspection of Ice Condenser Baskets

WO 98374383-01, Catawba 2 Perform Inspection of Ice Condenser Baskets

McGuire Unit 1-EOC 14 Ice Condenser Inspection Report

McGuire Unit 1 Ice Condenser Upper Inspection dated 06/20/2002

McGuire Unit 1 Ice Condenser Lower Inspections dated 03/16 and 04/10/2001

McGuire Unit 1 Ice Condenser Top Deck Inspection dated 04/10/2001

McGuire Unit 2-EOC 14 Ice Condenser Inspection Report

McGuire Unit 2 Ice Condenser Upper Inspection dated 06/19/2002

McGuire Unit 2 Ice Condenser Lower Inspections dated 03/09 and 03/14/2002

McGuire Unit 2 Ice Condenser Top Deck Inspection dated 03/14/2002

Catawba Unit 1 Ice Condenser Lower Plenum Inspection dated 11/15/2000

Catawba Unit 2 Ice Condenser Lower Plenum Inspection dated 09/15/2001

Catawba Unit 2 Ice Condenser Intermediate Deck Inspection dated 10/16/2001

Catawba Unit 2 Ice Condenser Top Deck Inspection dated 10/15/2001

Catawba Unit 1 NC System Leakage Results 11/01/2001 through 07/11/2002

Catawba Unit 2 NC System Leakage Results 08/05/2001 through 07/07/2002

McGuire Unit 1 NC Leakage Three year Trend

McGuire Unit 2 NC Leakage Three Year Trend

41

Catawba Annual Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Inspection Summary dated

12/05/2001

McGuire Annual Inspection of Standby Nuclear Service Water Dam and WCCB Dikes

Summary dated 06/06/2002

Catawba Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Topographic Survey Results dated 06/07/2000

PROBLEM INVESTIGATION PROCESS (PIP) DOCUMENTS

PIP M-02-1122, Internal Piping Inspection Unit 2 Condenser Circulating Water System B.

PIP M-98-00249, Life Expectancy of Unit 1 FWST Internal Coating Exceeded

PIP M-97-3386, Evaluate Requirement for Vessel Code Related Inspections of FWST

PIP C-98-03567, Corrosion of steel containment vessel near VX fan pit floor Catawba Unit 2

PIP C-95-01464, Containment vessel corrosion identified during SCV Inspection

PIP C-00-01555, UT examinations revealed many locations where containment shell plate

thickness is less than 90% of nominal

PIP C-02-03802, Service Water Pump Leakoff Line not properly Routed

PIP C-98-04719, Potential Significant Corrosion on Nuclear Service Water Components

PIP C-00-04315, Leak at Nuclear Service Water Pump 1A

PIP M-02-02098, Thermal Fatigue Management Program Transient Definition

PIP C-02-01928, Thermal Fatigue Management Program Transient Definition

PIP C-96-00344, Evaluation of PORV Actuation

PIP C-02-02618, Thermal Fatigue Management Program Transient Inconsistencies

PIP M-02-02413, Thermal Fatigue Management Program Transient Inconsistencies

PIP C-02-04043, Corrosion Identified on the RN System during License Renewal Walkdown

STATION DRAWINGS

Duke Dwg. MC-1330-01.00, Intake, Discharge and Low Level Intake Pipes, General layout,

Rev. 11

Duke Dwg. MC-1330-5, Condenser Cooling Water Discharge Pipes, Layout and Details, Rev.

10

MCFD-1563-01.00

Flow Diagram of Containment Spray System (NS), Revision 5

42

Engineering Documents

Engineering Support Document - Lifting Program/Cranes and Hoists, Rev. 0

System Health Report for Catawba Station Nuclear Service Water, Second Quarter, 2002

McGuire Engineering Guide 2.4, Workplace Guide for Documentation of Allowable Operating

Transient Cycles, Revision 1

CNS-1274.00-00-0009, Time-Limited Aging Analysis of Mechanical System Thermal Fatigue for

License Renewal, Revision 0

Calculation MCC-1553.12-00-0020, Region Designation for Individual Spent Fuel Pool Storage

Cells at McGuire, Revision 1

McGuire Engineering Support Program Primary System Leakage Control ESD, Revision 1

McGuire Service Water Pipe Inspection Program ESD

McGuire Service Water Pipe Corrosion Manual, Revision 9

Catawba Service Water Pipe Inspection Program dated 01/08/2001

Catawba Service Water Pipe Inspection Program Health Report, 2002Q1

MMP-001, Guideline for Engineering Disposition of Boric Acid Leakage, Revision 1

Special Engineering Procedure (SEP)-092-06, Procedure for Measuring the Boron-10 Areal

Density of Boraflex in PWR Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage Racks, Revision 3

43

ATTACHMENT 2

MCGUIRE AND CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATIONS

AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM INSPECTION

AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

APPLICATION

LOCATION

Alloy 600 Aging Management Review

B.3.1

Bottom-Mounted Instrumentation Thimble Tube

Inspection Program

B.3.5

Control Rod Drive Mechanism Nozzle and Other

Vessel Closure Penetrations Inspection Program

B.3.9

Flow Accelerated Corrosion Program

B.3.14

Inservice Inspection Plan

B.3.20

Reactor Vessel Integrity Program

B.3.26

Reactor Vessel Internals Inspection

B.3.27

Reactor Vessel Neutron Embrittlement

4.2

Steam Generator Surveillance Program

B.3.31

Boraflex Monitoring Program (McGuire only)

B.3.3

Divider Barrier Seal Inspection and Testing Program

B.3.11

Fluid Leak Management Program

B.3.15

Galvanic Susceptibility Inspection

B.3.16

Ice Condenser Inspections

B.3.18

Metal Fatigue

4.3

Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage

Monitoring Program

B.3.25

Service Water Piping Corrosion Program

B.3.29

Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond Dam Inspection

B.3.30

Standby Nuclear Service Water Pond

Volume Program (Catawba only)

4.7.3

Pressurizer Spray Head Examination

RAI 2.3.2.7-1

Battery Rack Inspections

B.3.2

Chemistry Control Program

B.3.6

Heat Exchanger Activities

B.3.17

Preventive Maintenance Activities

B.3.24

Sump Pump Systems Inspection

B.3.32

Borated Water Systems Stainless Steel Inspection

B.3.4

Crane Inspection Program

B.3.10

Liquid Waste System Inspection

B.3.22

Selective Leaching Inspection

B.3.28

Treated Water Systems Stainless Steel Inspection

B.3.34

Waste Gas System Inspection

B.3.36

Containment Inservice Inspection Plan - IWE

B.3.7

Containment Leak Rate Testing Program

B.3.8

Flood Barrier Inspection (McGuire only)

B.3.13

44

AGING MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

APPLICATION

LOCATION

Inspection Program for Civil Engineering Structures

and Components

B.3.21

Technical Specification SR 3.6.16.3 Visual Inspection

B.3.33

Underwater Inspection of Nuclear Service Water

Structures

B.3.35

Fire Protection Program

B.3.12

Inaccessible Non-EQ Medium Voltage Cables Aging

Management Program

B.3.19

Non-EQ Insulated Cables and Connections Aging

Management Program

B.3.23

45

ATTACHMENT 3

LIST OF ACRONYMS USED

AB

Auxiliary Building

AMR

Aging Management Review

ATWS

Anticipated Transient Without Scram

BTP

Branch Technical Position

CCW

Condenser Circulating Water

CFR

Code of Federal Regulations

CRDM

Control Rod Drive Mechanism

DBS

Design Basis Specification

DGB

Diesel Generator Building

ECT

Eddy Current Testing

EFPY

Effective Full Power Years

ESD

Engineering Support Document

EQ

Environmental Qualification program

FAC

Flow Accelerated Corrosion

FB

Fuel Building

FHA

Fire Hazards Analysis

FP

Fire Protection

HELB

High Energy Line Break

ISI

Inservice Inspection

LPSW

Low Pressure Service Water

LR

License Renewal

LRA

License Renewal Application

MP

Maintenance Procedure

NFB

New Fuel Building

NPS

Nominal Pipe Size

NSR

Non-Safety-related

NSW

Nuclear Service Water

NRR

NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

PIP

Problem Investigation Process

PORVs

Power Operated Relief Valves

PTS

Pressurized Thermal Shock

PWSCC

Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking

P/T

Pressure/Temperature

QA

Quality Assurance

RAI

Request for Additional Information

RHR

Residual Heat Removal

RI

Risk Informed

RTPTS

Reference Temperature Pressurized Thermal Shock

RVI

Reactor Vessel Internals

RWST

Refueling Water Storage Tank

RTD

Resistance Temperature Detector

SBO

Station Blackout event

SFP

Spent Fuel Pool

SG

Steam Generator

SNSW

Standby Nuclear Service Water

SR

Safety-related

SSC

Systems, Structures, and Components

SSF

Standby Shutdown Facility

46

TLAA

Time-Limited Aging Analysis

UFSAR

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report

UHI

Upper Head Injection System

USE

Upper Shelf Energy

Duke two letter system designator system

AD

Standby Shutdown Diesel System

CA

Auxiliary Feedwater System

CF

Feedwater System

CL

Feedwater Condensate Seal System

CM

Condensate System

CS

Condensate Storage System

FD

Diesel Generator Engine Fuel Oil System

FW

Refueling Water System

KC

Component Cooling Water

KD

Diesel Generator Cooling Water System

KF

Spent Fuel Cooling System

KR

Recirculated Cooling Water System

LD

Diesel Generator Engine Lube Oil System

LF

Feedwater Pump Turbine Lube Oil System

LP

Feedwater Pump Turbine Hydraulic Oil System

NC

Reactor Coolant System

ND

Residual Heat Removal System

NI

Safety Injection System

NS

Containment Spray System

NV

Chemical and Volume Control System

NW

Containment Valve Injection Water System

RC

CondenserCirculating Water System

RN

Nuclear Service Water System

SA

Main Steam Supply to Auxiliary Equipment

SM

Main Steam System

SP

Steam Supply to Feedwater Pump Turbine System

SV

Main Steam Vent to Atmosphere System

TE

Feedwater Pump Turbine Exhaust

TF

Feedwater Pump Turbine Steam Seal System

VA

Auxiliary Building Ventilation System

VD

Diesel Building Ventilation System

VE

Annulus Ventilation System

VF

Fuel Handling Building Ventilation System

VG

Diesel Generator Starting Air System

VI

Instrument Air System

VN

Diesel Generator Air Intake and Exhaust System

VR

Reactor Building Control Rod Drive Ventilation System

VX

Containment Air Return & Hydrogen Skimmer System

WN

Diesel Generator Room Sump Pump System

ZD

Diesel Generator Engine Crankcase Vacuum System