IR 05000341/1985051
| ML20138N626 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/18/1985 |
| From: | Smeenge R, Williams C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20138N604 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-85-51, NUDOCS 8512240091 | |
| Download: ML20138N626 (3) | |
Text
p n
- ;
.
-
..
,_,
.
.
i
.
_,.
,
,
.
.-
'
.. _.
.-
-
.'
-_-f+c Y.
_")
e
)
-
y
,
>
'
,
,
-
-
s
-
,
w r
%
,
}., ~ 4
'
.n
.-
.
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION
'
.
,
,
,
'
l REGION III-t
.
.-
%
-
[ReportNo.E50-341/85051(DRS).
'
, u:y
.
,
.
,
iDochetNo.'f50-341
.
?
'
License No..NPF-33
,y
^ : Licensee:L.DetroitEdisonl Company;
.
-
~
.
52000~Second Avenue-
.
- Detroit,' MId 48224
'
'
-
Fadility Name: 'Enrico_ Fermi Nuclear Power _. Plant, Unit 2
', '
l Inspection-At: -Enrico FermiJ2LSite,= Monroe,-MI
'
,
m
-..
..
.. o
..
,
' Inspection Conducted:.:De ember 4-6,71985-
-
,
,
/2.///'/J'C-
- > Inspector:.Ro
. Smeenge-
'
Date'
'
"
- &
(A r.
w
,.
7 w
.
.c
-
...
..
.
(tpeen
,
-
? Approved By;..
C.- Williams,. Chief.
' '
-
Plant Systems Section Date.
s
.
,
f-
,3
' '? "-
. Inspection' Summary--
I:-Inspection on December.4-6,11985-(Report No.'50-341/85'051(DRS))
~
'
m iAreas Inspected:. Special' unannounced inspection.of. licensee actions on work
'.'
-;being. performed:in:regards to the environmental qualification 4 requirements.of f
210 CFR'50.49.'._ The inspection involved a total _ of-23 inspector-hours onsit'e by,
~
_
LoneWegional-inspector..~
_...
.
S
,
%,
2: Results:.Of-the areas-Kinspected,Lno' violations or deviations.were identified.
f m
e
y-s
'
.o
. -.
-
M.g2240091 851218
>
'
ADOCK 05000341-
", i
=
-
. -
pop
,
_,
.
.
e _
,s
- c -
N.-
,,
+ ~
w
J.
I
'
.
s
e y
E g3
-
-
,.
..
.
., :;
'
,
N;
'
g
,
,
,
,
-
.
Q
-
M>
-
,
,
'
?
-
~
4 DETAILS'
,.,.
--x
- ,[
11.
JPersons" Contacted,
Detroith Edison'- Company;
'
e
'
,
- LJ Simpkin',: General Suhervisor',:Q/E M
$
_
- *Qi Duong,f Supervisor, EQ
-
g J.iConen,) Licensing Engineer
,
,
, ~
cP.7Pierron,'EQ: Engineer L. Raisanes,!EQ Engineer-C.yEmanuele,: Materials Engineering Group;
,
_
- 7J.fHanka;-Materials Engineering Group.
-
'
~
< _ nac
_
iPTByron,' Senior (ResidentfInspector-
~
,
.*M.; Parker,: Resident Inspector.
-
' '
- identifiesithbse'persohs who atitendedithe.exitimeeting onL eEdsb'er 6,
.
?1985 1
-
<
' <
^
,
_
,
,
g
.
J2 7 Inspection =De' tails:
-
.
.
,
,
" a.'
Documents"ReViewedi
The~in'pector reviewed the following documents lwhich currentlyL:.
s m
.
~~
implement the:11censee's program forLreview and approval of-work
-
~
'
performed and procurement:of Environmentally _ Qualified (EQ)
<
'
-equipment:
'
~
~(1):,NE-1.1621,;"The-Engineering Evaluation of. Stock an'd'Non-Stock
'
-
^
l Items and Services," Revision 0, dated April!26,' 1985
'
<
-
.
'
.
. :..
.
~
-
.
.
'
[(2)'LNE-3.9,?" Preparation, Review and Approval of Engineering' Design
- .
.
l Packages (EDPs),"'Revisien 4, dated August 30, 1985-
- .
,
,
M(3)eNOP-103,("NuclearSafetyReviewProgram," Revision 0,. dated
^
November 19,-1985-
~.
_
,
- (4) Procedure 7.2,'"Q-List," Revision'1,! dated August 6,.1985
,
,
,
- (5) Procedure :7.7, " Overview of!the Environmental Qual'ification-
~
-
Program'," Revision 0,-dated: June 6, 1985'
'
-
-(6) 3 Policy' Letter.EF2-68,607, " Equipment Qualification Requirements R for QA-1 Electrical : Spare / Replacement-Parts," dated January,11,
,
_
,
1985-
'
~
,
,
'
'
~(7)1" Environmental Qualification'of Safety Related Electric
'
.
-Equipment'forl Harsh' Environments"-(specific equipment
"
~ qualification summaries)
.
,
a E
'
,
-
_-
Ul.
-
..
+
-
w,
_
,.
-
.
-
.m
.e,..
,j A _
y.
.
'
__
<
,
_.
.
.
,
p*
Of ' i
.
~
'
?.,.,
_,
,
,
-
- b.-
Engineerina Design Packages'
'
,
ktitiheltime ofithis. inspection,1the. licensee was performingJs. review-J
'
- of 273 Engineering Design Packages'.(EDPs) which were~ associated with
-
lthe' plant 21: safety-related.-systems:that'contain EQ equipment. -This.
-
'
, - review wasjinitiated by th'e licensee'EQ group;to' ensure:thatialliEDPs,.
-
issued 'to 'datei regarding EQ equipment had received the ~ require' '
'
d
.
-reviews. ?The NRC.uinspector monitored this licensee review and was y-
>
c
- appraised'of, progress throughcutLthe' course'of this inspection.
-
' Prior to the'. exit ~ meeting on December 6, 1985, the licensee.had-completed:their review. 10f the 273 EDPs reviewed by the licensee,.
-
'
l180fwere: identified as not requiring:EQ review due to the:following:
.
20 were cancelled,'106 were-nonsafety-related applications,;53 were
.
- for equipme'nt that was'not. required to. operate in an' accident:
-
'
,
environment,'and l'was combined with another EDP..0f the 93fremaining,
48 were completed EDPs with evidence 'of t'.e required EQ review and 45 were 'not'yet-issued or required beyond'a Potential l Design Change (PCD).
~
"
~
- ThelinspectorLreviewed>seven completed EDPs for EQ equipment.
One-
.
-
EDP, reviewed,' relocated a transmitter.from a. harsh to mild environment
'
,and the'other six replaced unqualified equipme_nt, located in a harsh environment, with qualified. equipment. The~seven packages hadl
~
W
,
idocumented reviews by the QE group and sign off by Quality Assurance ((QA) forl hold points and completed work.
r ;s
-
,
-
'; c.
-Purchase Requisitions Reviewed 1.
- ~
TheLNRC inspector, reviewed. ten purchase requisitions for equipment.
.
'
- identified on the Q-List'(identifies plant safety-related equipment).
iThe nineLwhich required EQ had-been' reviewed by the licensee and the
+
-
- EQ
- requirements identified on the associated equipment:q'ualification
.. '
~ summaries ~ sheets were-included.in the purchase requisitions.
- <
, ~
"
x.
'
_. Replacement' equipment which had initially been qualified to NUREG-0588, Category II'was upgraded to Category I as' required by.
D
'
_
310 CFR-50.49.
' '
'
'f.
.
i3.
' Inspection Results'
.-
_
EIn this'limitediscope EQ inspection no' violations or deviations were-
-
Lidentified. /A more detailed EQ inspection is-scheduled for mid-1986.
,
J4.
iExit Interview
'
LThe; inspector met with the licensee representatives-(denoted in Persons
'
' Contacted);at.the conclusions'of-the inspection on December 6, 1985.
The f nspector summarized the purpose and. findings of the inspection, which
,f i
-
were acknowledged by the licensee. The inspector also discussed the
_
Liikely.informationalscontent of the inspection report with regard to
'
-
idocuments or processes revie'wed by the inspector during the inspection.
= The-licensee did not' identify any.such documents / processes.as proprietary.
-
i
,d
'
't
-
t
.
3.
~
'
.
w
.
.M'.-
.
. -
- - -,.
-._.
m~
.,....._.__ _ - -..._.-_...-. _ _,
_
L..
s - _ ____ __ _ _ _, _. _
.
.
'
-