05000317/LER-2012-003, Plant Shutdown Completed Due to Control Element Assembly Misalignment

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Plant Shutdown Completed Due to Control Element Assembly Misalignment
ML12285A380
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/10/2012
From: Costanzo C
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, Calvert Cliffs, EDF Group
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
LER 12-003-00
Download: ML12285A380 (6)


LER-2012-003, Plant Shutdown Completed Due to Control Element Assembly Misalignment
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications
3172012003R00 - NRC Website

text

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant CENG.

a joint venture of Constellation

ý6j9beDF CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, Maryland 20657 October 10, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:

SUBJECT:

Document Control Desk Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit No. 1; Docket No. 50-317; License No. DPR 53 Licensee Event Report 2012-003, Revision 00 Plant Shutdown Completed due to Control Element Assembly Misalignment The attached report is being sent to you as required by 10 CFR 50.73.

Should you have questions regarding this report, please contact Mr. Douglas E. Lauver at (410) 495-5219.

Very truly yours, Christopher R. Costanzo Plant General Manager CRC/CAN/bjd

Attachment:

As stated cc:

N. S. Morgan, NRC W. M. Dean, NRC Resident Inspector, NRC S. Gray, DNR

I NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 10/31/2013 11o-2olo)

Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br />. Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records and FOIA/Privacy Section (T-5 F53), U.S. Nuclear LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internet e-mail to infocollects.resource@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of (See reverse for required number of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control digits/characters for each block) number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to g respond to, the information collection.

I. FACILITY NAME

2. DOCKET NUMBER
73. PAGE Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 05000317
4. TITLE Plant Shutdown ComDleted due to Control Element Assembly Misalianment
5. EVENT DATE
6. LER NUMBER
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV MONTH DAY YEAR 05000 THBR O

05000 I

I__________________________N M E O

08 12 1

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 2012 2012 - 003 -

00 10 10 2012 05000 D. OPERATING MODE

11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR§: (Check all that apply)

El 20.2201(b)

El 20.2203(a)(3)(i)

[l 50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)

El 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

[1 20.2201(d)

El 20.2203(a)(3)(ii)

El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A)

El 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

El 20.2203(a)(1)

El 20.2203(a)(4)

El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

El 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

El 20.2203(a)(2)(i)

El 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)

[I 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

[1 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10. POWER LEVEL 0] 20.2203(a)(2)(ii)

[I 50.36(c)(1)(ii)(A)

[I 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A)

El 50.73(a)(2)(x)

[I 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 0l 50.36(c)(2)

El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A)

El 73.71(a)(4)

[I 20.2203(a)(2)(iv)

El 50.46(a)(3)(ii)

El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)

El 73.71(a)(5) 100 [1 20.2203(a)(2)(v)

Z 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)

El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)

El OTHER El 20.2203(a)(2)(vi)

El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)

El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D)

Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A

12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER
ACILITY NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)

Craig A. Neyman, Licensing Engineer 410-495-3507CAUSE SYSTEM COMPNT MANU-REPORTABLE

CAUSE

SYSTEM COMPONENT MANU-REPORTABLE FACTURER TO EPIX FACTURER TO EPIX B

AA CL W120 Y

14. SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED
15. EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSION El YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE) 0 NO DATE kBSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines)

On August 12, 2012, shutdown group Control Element Assembly (CEA) 9 dropped to the fully inserted position. At the time of the event, Unit 1 was operating at 100 percent rated thermal power and no planned CEA motions were in progress. Operators entered applicable Technical Specification Action Statements for the dropped CEA. It was identified that the CEA alignment could not be restored within the required completion time and operators entered Action Statement 3.1.4.F, which required the unit to be in Mode 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. Operators began the Technical Specification required unit shutdown at 1425. Unit 1 entered Mode 3, Hot Standby, at 1959 on August 12, 2012 and Mode 5, Cold Shutdown, at 1257 on August 13, 2012. The CEA dropped due to the failure of the Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) upper gripper coil. The upper gripper coil failed due to an internal short circuit most likely caused by a defect in the windings. Corrective actions include replacement of the CEDM coil stack and testing to identify coil degradation. The unit was returned to full power at 1630 on August 18, 2012. No previous occurrences were identified involving a unit shutdown due to a dropped CEA.

NRC FORM 366 (10-2010)U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (10-2010)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. FACILITY NAME
2. DOCKET
6. LER NUMBER
3. PAGE I

SEQUENTIAL I REV YEAR NUM BER NNO 2

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 05000 317 2012

-- 003 00 2

of 05 I.

DESCRIPTION OF EVENT

A.

PRE-EVENT PLANT CONDITIONS:

On August 12, 2012, Unit 1 was operating at 100 percent rated thermal power. There were no inoperable systems, structures, or components that would have impacted this event.

B.

EVENT:

On August 12, 2012, a condition was identified that resulted in a plant shutdown required by Technical Specifications. At 1234, shutdown group Control Element Assembly (CEA) 9 dropped to the fully inserted position. At the time of the event, no planned CEA motions were in progress. Operators stabilized reactor power at 87 percent and entered the following Technical Specification Action Statements:

3.11.4.B for CEA alignment 3.1.5.B for one shutdown CEA withdrawn less than 121.5 inches 3.2.4.A for azimuthal power tilt 3.4.1.A for Reactor Coolant System pressure, temperature, and flow departure from nucleate boiling.

Operators discovered that the Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) power supply breaker for CEA 9 had tripped open. In an attempt to recover the dropped CEA, one attempt was made to reclose the breaker. Additional troubleshooting revealed low resistance in the upper gripper coil, indicating an internal short circuit. It was determined that the CEA alignment could not be restored within the required completion time and operators entered Action Statement 3.1.4.F, which thereafter, required the unit to be in Mode 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. Operators began the Technical Specification required unit shutdown at 1425. Unit 1 entered Mode 3 at 1959 on August 12, 2012 and Mode 5 at 1257 on August 13, 2012. Following replacement of the failed coil, the unit was returned to full power at 1630 on August 18, 2012.

C.

INOPERABLE STRUCTURES, COMPONENTS, OR SYSTEMS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT:

The dropped CEA resulted in entering applicable Technical Specification Action Statements.

Operators then entered Action Statements 3.1.4.F and 3.1.5.C when it was determined the CEA alignment could not be restored. This resulted in a Technical Specification required unit shutdown for repairs.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (10-2010)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. FACILITY NAME
2. DOCKET
6. LER NUMBER
3. PAGE SEQUENTIAL REV YEAR NUMBER NO.

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 05000 317 2012

-- 003 00 3

of 05 D.

DATES AND APPROXIMATE TIMES OF MAJOR OCCURRENCES

August 12, 2012 1234 - Shutdown group CEA 9 dropped to the fully inserted position. Operations entered Technical Specification Action Statements for one CEA trippable and misaligned from its group by greater than 15 inches. Operators also implemented Abnormal Operating Procedure (AOP)-1 B, CEA Malfunction.

1253 - Reactor power stabilized at 87percent.

1425 - Commenced unit shutdown.

1959 - Placed the unit in Mode 3. Exited applicable Technical Specification Action Statements for CEA misalignment. Exited AOP-1 B.

August 13, 2012 0200 - Troubleshooting identified a CEDM coil failure. Commenced cool down to Mode 5.

1257 - Placed the unit in Mode 5.

August 14, 2012 2210 - Following repairs, commenced unit heat up.

August 18, 2012 1630 - Unit 1 returned to 100 percent reactor power.

E.

OTHER SYSTEMS OR SECONDARY FUNCTIONS AFFECTED

No other systems or secondary functions were affected by this event.

F.

METHOD OF DISCOVERY

The event was self-revealing.

G.

MAJOR OPERATOR ACTION:

When it was determined that the CEA could not be realigned with its group within the time required by Technical Specifications, operators placed the unit in Mode 3, Hot Standby.

Operators subsequently placed the unit in Mode 5, Cold Shutdown, to facilitate repairs.

Following repairs, Operators began unit startup and returned the unit to full power on August 18, 2012..U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (10-2010)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. FACILITY NAME
2. DOCKET
6. LER NUMBER
3. PAGE SEQUENTIAL REV YEAR NUMBER NO.

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 I 05000 317 2012

-- 003 00 4

of 05 H.

SAFETY SYSTEM RESPONSES:

There were no demands for safety system actuations during this event.

II.

CAUSE OF EVENT

This event is documented in the site's Corrective Action Program under CR-2012-007626. The CEDM upper gripper coil for CEA 9 failed. Upper gripper coil resistance was 2.5 ohms, indicating an internal short circuit in the coil. The average resistance value for all other CEDM upper gripper coils was 7.2 ohms. Engineering determined that the internal short circuit was most likely caused by a defect in the windings.

Ill.

ANALYSIS OF EVENT

This event is reportable in accordance with the following:

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A) - "The completion of any nuclear plant shutdown required by the plant's Technical Specifications."

Operators completed the Technical Specification required shutdown on August 12, 2012 which meant it is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A).

This event did not result in any actual nuclear safety consequences. The CEA drop event is analyzed in Section 14.11 of the Calvert Cliffs' Updated Final Safety Analysis Report. The most limiting CEA drop event is an uncontrolled CEA insertion at hot full power. The event is bounded by the Section 14.11 safety analysis.

The risk associated with the CEA drop event is considered to have a relatively low impact. While the probabilistic risk assessment does not model the failure likelihood of a single dropped CEA, the failure could be a precursor to a plant trip. A plant trip has a Conditional Core Damage Probability of 6.6E-07 and a Conditional Large Release Probability of 2.8E-08. A dropped CEA is considered to be within the bounds of a plant trip. As a result, the risk associated with this event is considered small and is not significant from a probabilistic risk assessment perspective.

This event has limited impact on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Reactor Oversight Process Performance Indicators for Unit 1. The performance indicator for Unplanned Power Changes per 7000 Critical Hours is projected to rise by 1 and remain low in the green band.

IV.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

A.

ACTION TO RETURN AFFECTED SYSTEMS TO PRE-EVENT NORMAL STATUS:

The affected CEDM coil stack was replaced.

I

.IU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (10-2010)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. FACILITY NAME
2. DOCKET
6. LER NUMBER
3. PAGE SEQUENTIAL REV YEAR NUMBER NO/

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 05000 317 2012

-- 003 00 5

of 05 B.

ACTION TAKEN OR PLANNED TO PREVENT RECURRENCE:

1.

Review CEDM performance during future testing for indications of coil degradation.

2.

Evaluate vendor report on failed coil to verify apparent cause and actions taken.

If additional information is subsequently developed that would significantly affect the understanding of this event, a supplemental licensee event report will be submitted.

V. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A.

FAILED COMPONENTS:

The CEDM upper gripper coil was supplied by Westinghouse Electric Corporation, model N0100.

B.

PREVIOUS LERS ON SIMILAR EVENTS:

A review of Calvert Cliffs' events over the past several years was performed. No previous occurrences were identified involving a unit shutdown due to a dropped CEA.

C.

THE ENERGY INDUSTRY IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (EIIS) COMPONENT FUNCTION IDENTIFIER AND SYSTEM NAME OF EACH COMPONENT OR SYSTEM REFERRED TO IN THIS LER:

IEEE 803 IEEE 805 COMPONENT EIIS FUNCTION SYSTEM ID CEDM Upper Gripper Coil CL AA D.

SPECIAL COMMENTS:

None.