ML11263A076
| ML11263A076 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 02/04/2011 |
| From: | Logan D T Division of License Renewal |
| To: | Imboden A S, Pham B M, Wentzel M J, Doyle D I, Perkins L T Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2011-0113 | |
| Download: ML11263A076 (2) | |
Text
I ' /Logan, Dennis From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 3:32 PM To: Pham, Bo; Imboden, Andy; Wentzel, Michael; Perkins, Leslie; Doyle, Daniel
Subject:
Five documents Comment SHC-F-8 points out that we ignored the analyses of the effects of the Salem plant done by the EPA: EPA. 2002. Case Study Analysis for the Proposed Section 316(b) Phase II Existing Facilities Rule. Part B: The Delaware Estuary Watershed Case Study. EPA-821-R-02-002.
Office of Water, Washington, DC.http://water.epa.gov/lawsre-gs/lawsguidance/cwa/316b/phase2/upload/2009 04 14 316b phase2 ca sestudy chbl-2.pdf The entire document is in http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawscquidance/cwa/316b/phase2/casestudy index.cfm EPA. 2004. Regional Analysis Document for the Final Section 316(b) Phase II Existing Facilities Rule. Part D: Mid-Atlantic Region. EPA-821-R-02-003.
Office of Water, Washington, DC.http://water.epa.-qov/lawsreqs/lawsgquidance/cwa/316b/phase2/upload/2009 04 14 316b phase2 ca sestudy final chdl.pdf The entire document is in http://water.epa..qov/lawsregs/laws-quidance/cwa/316b/phase2/casestudy final.cfm Commenter SHC- U points out that we ignored the following analyses of the effects of Salem plant done by the Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife and submitted to and accepted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection:
Kahn, D.M. 2000. Mortality of Delaware River striped bass from entrainment and impingement by the Salem Nuclear Generating Plant. Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife.
March 30, 2000.Kahn, D.M. 2001. Assessment of impact of the Salem Nuclear Generating Station on weakfish and striped bass. Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife.
March 8, 2001.These two documents are in the second of two ADAMS accessions for this commenter:
5 Comment SHC-F-9 points out that NRC ignored analyses of the impacts of Salem done for, reported to, and accepted by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) by their contractor, ESSA Technologies Ltd.: ESSA. 2000. Review of Portions of Salem Permit--Final Report for New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
June 2000. ESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, BC.I have not been able to find this document on the web.6