ML16200A093

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:54, 30 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor License Termination Plan - Chapter 6 - Compliance with the Radiological Criteria for License Termination, Rev. 0
ML16200A093
Person / Time
Site: La Crosse  File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/2016
From:
LaCrosseSolutions
To:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
Download: ML16200A093 (114)


Text

LA CROSSE BOILIN G WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 6 COMPLIANCE WITH THE RADIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR LICENSE TERMINATION

La CrossLicense TRevision6.Com6.1.6.2.6.2.6.2.

6.2.

6.2.46.3.6.4.6.5.6.5.6 66.5.

6.5.

6.5.46.5.

6.5.

6.5.6.6.6.6.

6.6.6.7.6.7.

6.7.6.8.6.8.

6.8.

6.8.6.9.6.10.6.106 6

6 6se Boiling WTermination n 0 mpliance wit hSite Releas eGeneral Sit e1.Site Ge2.Site Hy3.Area L4.Area GBasements,

Future Lan dDose Mode 1.Backfil.5.1.1.BFM.5.1.2.BFM2.Soil ....

3.Buried 4.Existin5.Remain6.Dose S7.AlternaMixture Fr a1.Potenti2.MixturSoil Dose A1.Soil So2.Soil ExSoil DCGL 1.Parame2.RESRA3.Soil DCSoil Deter mBasement0.1.Sou.10.1.1.Re.10.1.2.W.10.1.3.W.10.1.4.ReWater Reacto rPlan h the Radio le Criteria ....e Descriptio neology.........

ydrogeolog yand Use .....

Groundwater Structures ad Use Scena rl Overview lled Baseme M Insitu Sc eM Excavati o...................

Piping .......

ng Groundw aning Above Summation foate Scenario sactions for I nial Radionu ce Fractions fAssessment aource Term .

xposure Pat hComputati oeter Selectio nAD Paramet eCGL Uncert ministic Ana lt Fill Conce purce Term ...

eactor Build iWaste Treatm Waste Gas Ta nemaining St rr TABLE Ological Crite r...................

.n ................

....................

.y ..................

....................

.Use ...........

.and Piping t orio and Ave r...................

.nts ..............

.enario .........

.on Scenario

....................

....................

.ater .............

.Ground Bui lfor Complia ns .................

.nitial Suite Rclides of Co nfor Initial S uand DCGL ..

....................

.hways and C ron Model -

Rn Process ...

.er Selection ainty Analy slysis and So iptual Model

...................

.ing .............

.ent Buildin gnk Vault .....

.ructures ......

.6-i OF CONTEria for Lice n...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.o Remain a ftrage Membe...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.ldings.........

.nce ..............

....................

.Radionuclid encern and In iuite Radion u...................

....................

.ritical Grou pRESRAD v7...................

.for Uncerta isis Results..

.il DCGLs ...

...................

....................

....................

.g .................

....................

....................

.ENTS nse Termina t...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.fter License Ter of the Cri t...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.es ................

.itial Suite ...

.uclides ........

....................

....................

.p .................

.7.0 ..............

....................

.inty Analys i...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.tion ............

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.Terminatio ntical Group .

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.is ................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.n (End State

)...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.... 6-1... 6-1... 6-1... 6-1... 6-2... 6-2... 6-3) .. 6-3... 6-6... 6-7... 6-7... 6-7... 6-8... 6-9... 6-9. 6-10. 6-10. 6-10. 6-10. 6-11. 6-11. 6-12. 6-13. 6-13. 6-14. 6-14. 6-14. 6-15. 6-17. 6-18. 6-19. 6-20. 6-20. 6-20. 6-21. 6-21 La CrossLicense TRevision6.106.11.6.1166 6

66.116.12.6.13.6.136.14.6.15.6.16.6.17.6.18.6.186.186.186.186.186.19.6.20.6.21. se Boiling WTermination n 0 0.2.BFMBFM Insi1.1.BFM.11.1.1.BF.11.1.2.BF.11.1.3.BF.11.1.4.BF1.2.BFMBFM ExcInsignifi c3.1.RadConcentraAlternate

BFM ElevSoil AreaBuried Pi8.1.Sou8.2.Exp8.3.Bur8.4.Bur8.5.BurExisting GDemonstrReferenceWater Reacto rPlan M Exposureitu Scenario M Insitu Gr oFM Insitugw FM Insitugw FM Insitugw FM Insitugw M Insitu Dr icavation Sc ecant Dose C odionuclides oations in Ex c Land Use Svated Area Ca Factors .....

iping Dose Aurce Term a nposure Scen aried Piping Dried Pipe D Cried Pipe R aGroundwaterating Com pes ...............

r e Pathways ..

....................

.oundwater SComputatio RESRAD URESRAD DDose Facto rilling Spoils enario ..........

.ontributors aof Concern acavated Fill Scenario Do sConsiderati o...................

.Assessment and Radionu cario and Cri tDose Assess CGLs Initial adionuclides er Dose........

.pliance with

...................

.6-ii ...................

....................

.Scenario ......

.n Model .....

.Uncertainty ADeterministi crs ................

.Scenario a n...................

.and Radionu and Adjuste dMaterial ....

.se ................

.ons ..............

....................

.and DCGL .

.clide Mixtur etical Group

.ment ..........

.Suite .........

.of Concern

...................

.Dose Criter i...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.Analysis for c Analysis a n...................

.nd DF Calc u...................

.uclides of C od Soil DCG L...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.e .................

....................

....................

....................

.and Adjust e...................

.ion .............

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.Initial Suit end DSR Res...................

.ulation .........

....................

.oncern .........

.Ls and BFM...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.ed DCGLs ..

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.e ..................

.sults ............

....................

....................

....................

....................

.M DFs ..........

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.. 6-22. 6-22. 6-22. 6-24. 6-24. 6-26. 6-26. 6-33. 6-33. 6-35. 6-36. 6-39. 6-39. 6-41. 6-42. 6-43. 6-43. 6-43. 6-44. 6-44. 6-45. 6-47. 6-48. 6-49 La CrossLicense TRevisionTable 6-1Table 6-2Table 6-3Table 6-4Table 6-5Table 6-6Table 6-7Table 6-8Table 6-9Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-1Table 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-2se Boiling WTermination n 0 1BasemeEnd St2Buried 3Initial S4Determ used in5DetermKd par6Soil DCfor Non7LACBW8DetermUncert9ResultsSelecte10BFM Infor Dis11BFM Infor Dis12BFM InDistrib13BFM InDistrib14BFM Infor Dis15BFM InRemain16BFM In17BFM In18BFM E19Soil DCDose F20ReactorContrib21WTB BContrib22WGTVContribWater Reacto rPlan ents and Be ltate Ground Piping to r eSuite of Pot eministic Val un to calcula tministic para mrameters for CGL Uncert n-Nuclide S WR Soil DCministic Geo mtainty Anal ys of RESRA Ded Determin insitugw Rx Bstribution C onsitugw Rx Bstribution C onsitugw WTBbution Coef finsitugw WGTbution Coef finsitugw Remstribution C onsitugw DSRning Struct unsitugw Dosensitu Drillin Excavation DCGLs for R OFraction ......

r Building Bbutor Dose FBFM DFs fo butor Dose FV BFM DFs fbutor Dose Fr LIST low Ground surface ele vemain in LA Cential Radio nues selected fte Soil DCG Lmeter value ssoil DCGL cainty Resul tpecific Para mCGLs for Ini tmetry RESRysis for the fD Uncertai nistic Param eBuilding abo voefficients (

KBuilding bel ooefficients (

KB Uncertain tficients (Kd)

.TV Uncerta ificients (Kd)

.maining Stru coefficients (

KRs for React oures .............

.e Factors .....

.g Spoils Do sDose Factors OC Adjuste d...................

.BFM DFs fo rFraction ......

.r ROC Adj uFraction ......

.for ROC AdFraction ......

.6-iii OF TABLEStructures t ovation is 63 9CBWR End nuclides an dfor Sensitiv eLs ..............

.s selected fo rcalculation .

.t and Deter mmeter Distri tial Suite R aRAD Parame five BFM In snty Analysis eters ............

.ve 619: Un cKd) .............

.ow 619 Unc eKd) .............

.ty Analysis R...................

.inty Analysi s...................

.ctures Uncer tKd) .............

.or Building, W...................

....................

.se Factors ..

. ..................

.d for Insigni f...................

.r ROC Adju

...................

.usted for Ins i...................

.djusted for I n...................

.ES o Remain i n9 feet AMS LState .........

.d Mixture F re Kd param e...................

.r non-sensit i...................

.ministic Val uibutions ......

.adionuclide seters used in situgw Configfor BFM In

...................

.certainty An a...................

.ertainty An a...................

.Results for

...................

.s Results fo r...................

.rtainty Anal y...................

.WTB, WGT...................

....................

....................

....................

.ficant Cont r...................

.usted for Ins i...................

.ignificant

...................

.nsignificant

...................

.n LACBWR L .................

....................

.ractions ......

.eters ...................

.ive ...................

.ues selected

...................

.s .................

.the gurations ....

.situgw and

...................

.alysis Resul t...................

.alysis Resul t...................

....................

.r ...................

.ysis Results

...................

.TV, and ...................

....................

....................

....................

.ributor ...................

.ignificant

...................

....................

....................

. ...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

. ...................

....................

....................

....................

.ts ...................

.ts ...................

....................

....................

. ...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.... 6-4... 6-5. 6-12. 6-17. 6-18. 6-18. 6-19. 6-25. 6-27. 6-28. 6-28. 6-29. 6-29. 6-30. 6-31. 6-32. 6-34. 6-35. 6-37. 6-38. 6-38. 6-38 La CrossLicense TRevisionTable 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-2Table 6-3 Figure 6-Figure 6-Figure 6-Figure 6-Figure 6-Figure 6-Figure 6- 6-1 RES6-2 RES6-3 DosAgg se Boiling WTermination n 0 23RemainInsigni24ROC an25Surface26RESRA27Buried 28Buried Radion29SummeInsigni30Ground-1Site Re-2Site Ov-3LACBW-4LACBW-5LACBW-6LACBWElevati-7RESRASRAD InputSRAD Inpute Contributi gregate Dos eWater Reacto rPlan ning Structu rificant Cont rnd Insignifi ce Soil Area FAD Source TPiping DC GPipe DCGLnuclide Frac ted Buried P iificant Radi odwater Exp oegional Loc averview .......

WR Buildin gWR End StaWR End StaWR End Staion View ....

AD Paramet et Parameters t Parameters on Percenta ge Percentage r res BFM DFributor Dos ecant Radion uFactors .......

.Term Param eGLs .............

.Ls for ROCs tions ...........

.ipe DCGLs fonuclide Fr aosure Factor sLIST Oation ............

....................

.gs ...............

.ate ...............

.ate - Backfil late - Backfil

...................

.er Selection ATTAfor LACBWfor LACBWge for Initia lfrom Insig n6-iv Fs for ROC Ae Fraction ....

.uclide Mixt u...................

.eters for Bu r...................

.Adjusted f o...................

.for ROCs a dactions .........

.s..................

.OF FIGURE...................

....................

....................

....................

.led Structur eled Reactor

...................

.Flow Chart

.ACHMENTWR Soil DC GWR BRM Unl Suite Radi onificant Dos eAdjusted fo r...................

.ture Fractio n...................

.ried Piping

...................

.or Insignific

...................

.djusted for

...................

....................

.RES ...................

....................

....................

....................

.es ................

.Building B a...................

....................

.TS GL Uncerta incertainty A onuclides a ne Contributo r ...................

.ns ................

....................

.DCGL Calc...................

.ant ...................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.asement ...................

....................

.inty Analysi Analysis .....

.nd Determin aors ...............

....................

....................

....................

.culations .....

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

....................

.s .................

....................

.ation of ..................

6. 6-38. 6-39. 6-43. 6-45. 6-46. 6-47. 6-47. 6-48. 6-50. 6-51. 6-52. 6-53. 6-54. 6-55. 6-56. 6-57. 6-796-103 La CrossLicense TRevisionAF ALARA AMCG AMSL ANL BFM BFM InsBFM Insbgs DCGL DF DPC FRS G-3 GW HSA HTD ISFSI LACBWLSE LTP MARSAMARSSIMDA MDC NRC PRCC RESRADROC TEDE USACE WGTV WTB

se Boiling WTermination n 0 AreaAs LAveAboArg Basesitugw BFMsituds BFMBeloDeriDosDairFinaGenGro HistHardIndeWR La CLACLiceAME MulManIM MulMinMinNucPartD RESRadTotaU.S WasWasWater Reacto rPlan LIST OF a Factor Low As Reaerage Memb eove Mean S eonne Natio nement Fill MM Insitu Gr oM Insitu Dri low Ground Sived Conce nse Factor ryland Pow eal Radiation noa-3 undwater torical Site Ad-to-Detect ependent Sp eCrosse Boili nCBWR Site ense Termin lti-Agency Rnual lti-Agency Rnimum Dete cnimal Detect clear Regula ttial Rank C oSidual RAD idionuclides oal Effective D. Army Cor pste Gas Tan kste Treatme n r ACRONYMasonable Ac her of the Cri ea Level nal Laborato rModel oundwater lling Spoils Surface ntration Gui der Cooperati vSurvey Assessment ent Fuel Sto rng Water R eEnclosure ation Plan Radiation S uRadiation S uctable Activ iable Conce ntory Commi orrelation C oioactive ma tof Concern Dose Equiv aps of Engin ek Vault nt Building 6-v MS AND ABhievable tical Group ry deline Level ve rage Install aeactor urvey and A survey and Si tity ntration ssion oefficient terials alent eers BBREVIATl ation ssessment o fte Investigat TIONS f Materials aion Manual and Equipm e ent La CrossLicense TRevision se Boiling WTermination n 0 Water Reacto rPlan r Page Inten t6-vi tionally Le ftft Blank La CrossLicense TRevision6.CS6.1.The site rcriteria fRegulatioDoseresultgroupwaterAs LoreducChapter CriterionCriterionG6.2.This sectsite. Landescripti oHydrogeCooperaThe LACVillage oto the nothe west 522), fiv

east shorshown inEnclosur6.2.1.SLACBWof the Cdescribedand fluvishales ofapproxim se Boiling WTermination n 0 Compliancite Release release crite rfor unrestric ons (10 CFR Criterion:

Tts in a Total p that does nr; and ow As Reas oced to levels 4 describes

n. This Ch an. General Site tion provid end and gro uon of site ological In vtive, Genoa CBWR facil iof Genoa (p oorthwest) is Rshore of t he miles sou tre, is an uni nn Figure 6-2re (LSE) fen cite Geolo gyWR is locate dCentral Lo wd as approxi ial deposits

.f the Dres hmately 650 f eWater Reacto rPlan ce with th eCriteria ria for the Lted release R 20.1402):

The residual Effective D not exceed 2 5onably Ach ithat are ALthe metho dapter descri b Descriptio nes a general undwater us geology avestigation RWisconsin (ity is locate dopulation a bReno, Minn he Mississip thwest of th encorporated 2, with a mce shown in y d on the east land Physi omately 15 f

e. These unc hbach Grou peet below th e r e Radiologa Crosse B ospecified i nradioactivit yose Equival e5 mrem/yr, iievable (AL AARA. ds and resu lbes the me tn description e in the vi and hydrogReport, La 1). d 17 miles s obout 800) (s eesota, an u npi River. T he plant. Vi chamlet of amore detaile Figure 6-3.

bank of the ographic Pr oeet of hydra uonsolidated p and by d ee ground su r6-1 gical Crit eoiling Water n Title 10, Sy that is dist ent (TEDE) including th aARA) Crite rlts for dem othods for d eof the geol ocinity of si tgeology is Crosse Bo iouth of the Cee Figure 6-nincorporate dhe nearest cctory, Wisco nabout 80 pe od view of tMississipp iovince. The ulic fill ove rdeposits ar eense Preca mrface (bgs).

eria for Li cReactor (L ASection 20.1 4tinguishable to an avera gat from gro urion: The re sonstrating c oemonstratin gogy and hy dte are also provided i niling Water City of La C1). The ne ad hamlet of community insin, five mople. The L Athe facilitie si River in th elocal geol orlying 100 t oe underlain mbrian crys tcense Ter ACBWR) are402, of the from backg rge member oundwater so usidual radio aompliance wg complian cdrogeology described.

n Haley &Reactor, DCrosse and a arest comm uabout 300 pin Iowa is Nmiles south o ACBWR lices inside th ee Wisconsi nogy of the o 130 feet o by flat lyi ntalline rock sminatione the radiol oCode of F eround radia tof the critic aurces of dri nactivity has bwith the A Lce with the at the LAC B A detaile d& Aldrich, Dairyland Pmile south ounity (three mpeople locat eNew Albin f the plant oensed site are LACBWRn Driftless s esite is gen ef glacial ou tng sandston es encounter ogical ederal tion al nking been LARA Dose BWR d site Inc., Power of the miles ed on (pop. on the rea is R Site ection erally twash e and ed at La CrossLicense TRevisionThe prim0 to 2bgs a20 tothickn30 tograve100 t115 t6.2.2.SRegionalit is like lthe surfagroundwinfluence6.2.3.AThe LACthe Missbounded EngineerThe 163.the 1the Gand ilocatean are(ISFSan apfrom the laoil) fuwasha parcThe areaand freshto the G-se Boiling WTermination n 0 mary soil typ e20 feet bgs.

Hand describe d 30 feet bgs

.ness of 7 to 100 feet bg el below the o 115 feet b o 135 feet b ite Hydrogelly, ground wly that the g race water.

Gwater flow a ned by the riv Area Land UCBWR facil isissippi Riv eby the Mi rs (USACE) 5 acre site i s.5 acre LA CGenoa-3 (G-3s owned an ded to the so uea south of GSI) is locate dpproximatel ypast operat iand north of fueled powe rhing area (an cel of land t oa of the Mis sh water fish i3 station lo cWater Reacto rPlan es encounte rHydraulic F id as light br

o. Brown to g28 feet,
s. Brown, fi nfiner sands, gs. Brown f igs. Brown f ieology water flows froundwater fGroundwate rnd also sho wer stage.

Use ity is locate der. Althou gssissippi Ri property to s comprised CBWR facili t3) coal-fired d operated b yuth, adjacen tG-3 where t hd, y 36 acre ar eions, the LACBWr plant (rem oapproxima to the east o fsissippi Riv eing) and co mcated south or red at the sit eill - Fill san down to bro wgrey, fine to mne to mediu mine to medi uine to medi ufrom the blu flow directi or elevation ws seasonal vd in the far wgh the site aver to the wthe north, a nof the follo wty, , 379 MWe ey Dairyland t to LACBWhe LACBWRea surroundi nWR plant wa oved in 198 9ely 900 m 2 cf Highway 3 5er adjacent tmmercial ba rof the LAC B6-2 e are: ds are enco uwn, fine to m medium fin em sands tha tum sand and um sand wit hff towards t hon turns "d odata from evariation on uwestern porti area is 163.

west, a rail nd a wildlif ewing: electric po wPower Coo pWR, R Independ eng the ISFS Is the site of

9) which no wcoal ash lan d5, across fr oto the site i srge and ship BWR plant).

untered fro mmedium sand se sands und et also have zfine to med ih trace silt, ohe Mississi pownstream" aeight onsite upward and ion of Vern o5 acres, it iline to th ee and fish re fwer station t hperative (D Pent Spent F uI containing the former Gw includes t hdfill is also pom LACBWRs used for r ep traffic (e.g

. There is a pm approxima ts with occas ierlie the fill, zones of coa rium gravels

,occasional z oppi River. C las groundw ae wells agr edownward gon County o nis relativel ye east, U.S.

fuge to the s hat was com pPC). The G-uel Storage I nthe closed cGenoa-1 (G

-he site switc hpresent),

R. ecreational

p. barges of cpublic boat ltely 0 to 20 fional fine g rwith an ave rse sand an d, ones of gra vloser to the ater dischar gees with re ggradients th an the east b ay isolated a sArmy Corpouth. pleted in 19 63 station is nstallation coal ash lan d-1) coal (an dhyard and bapurposes (b ocoal are deli vlanding on t hfeet ravel, rage d fine vel. river, ges to gional at are ank of s it is ps of 69 dfill d later arge oating vered he La CrossLicense TRevisionsite, loc aMississipfor hunti nNational Lock andnorth of operated from dawmaintain LACBWThe clos no reside6.2.4.AThere arein 1963 tLSE and to the G-HighwayB6.3.The confbuildingsAll but tcorresponthat will

The belo 1 and shobasementwater tabone foot As seen outside oadjacent

land areaChaptersareas outThe strucbasementwill be rstructure liner wil lse Boiling WTermination n 0 ated approxi mppi River N ang, fishing aFish Hatch ed Dam No.

8the site. T hby the US Awn to dusk s a highw aWR site, acro sest town is Gences within Area Groun de two water to 129 feet are still in u3 plant. Re gy 35. Basements, Sfiguration o s at the time two LACBWnds to an e lremain int aw ground p oown in Figu rt below 636 ble elevatio nbelow the a vin Figure 6

-of the LSE bopen land aas and buil d 2 and 5 fo rtside of the Lctures to be ts, isolated sremoved.

Ts in this LT Pl remain; all Water Reacto rPlan mately 4,00 0ational Wild land recreati oery. 8, located o nhe dam is a ACE. This f aduring the ay wayside ss from Loc kGenoa, loca t2,000 feet odwater Use supply wel land 116 fe euse as potab lgionally, the rStructures af the remai nof license t eWR buildinglevation of 6act are the Lortions of th eres 6-4 and 6foot elevat in. Note that verage wate r-2, there are but within t hareas were n dings outsi dr additional dLSE. backfilled wsumps and rThe backfil lP Chapter. interior co nr 0 feet south olife & Fish Ronal activiti en the Missis s110 feet wi dacility also a lmonths of Aoff State Hk and Dam Nted approxi mof any LAC Bls on the sit eet bgs, resp ele water for Lre are five d oand Piping tning backfilermination i sgs will be d 636 foot A vLACBWR Ae buildings t6-5. Figure ion which is there are al sr table elev anumerous bhe LACBWRot used to s ude of the L Sdiscussion a nwill be co memaining p oled structur eFor the Re acrete and th e6-3 of the plant.

Refuge just ses. Further s osippi River ade, 600 feet llows publi cApril throu gHighway 35No. 8. mately 1 mi lBWR struct ue (Deep We lectively. Bo tLACBWR. Somestic wel lto Remain alled baseme ns designate demolished t verage Mea nAdministrati oto be demol i6-6 provid ethe only ba so three ver yation. buildings as sR licensed bupport LACSE fence ar end justificat mprised of c oortions of fo es are gene ractor Buildi ne steel liner There is a psouth of the outh are pu bat mile 679.

2long lock ac access to agh Novembe5 approximle to the no rure. ll 3 and De eth wells are Separate gr ols south of t hafter Licen snts, buried d as the "En dto at least t hn Sea Level on Building ished and b aes a cross-se csement wit hy small su msociated wi tboundary.

HCBWR operae designate dtion of the n ooncrete onl youndations.

rally referre ng, only the will be rem oportion (Po osite which hblic land are 2, is approx iand dam str uan observati oer. The St amately 1/2 m irtheast of t hep Well 4) t hlocated up goundwater whe LACBWse Termina tpiping, ope nd State."

hree feet be l(AMSL). T and LACBackfilled are ction of the h a portion bmps with flo oth the G-3 c However, th eations. The d as non-im pon-impacte dy and inclu dAll systems ed to as eit hconcrete ex oved. All reol 9) of the Uhas limited aas and the Gimately 0.6 mucture owne don platform, ate of Wisc ile north o he site. The rhat were ins tgradient fro mwells supply wR site and e ation (End S tn land area slow grade wThe two builWR Crib Hlisted in Ta bReactor Bu ibelow the av ors that ext eoal plant th aese buildingmajority of pacted. See d classificati de full and p and compo her baseme nterior to the emaining Upper access Genoa miles d and open onsin f the re are talled m the water ast of tate) s and which dings House. ble 6-ilding erage end to at are s and fopen LTP ion of partial nents nts or steel La CrossLicense TRevisionTable 6-BasemeReactorWaste TWaste GRemainconcrete criteria.

For the TreatmendesignateassessmeRemainina unique

low potesteel lin eIn additi

Reactor Band needinappropremain isthe relat iWGTV wRemaininAs seen relativel yare very

separatelse Boiling WTermination n 0 1 BasemGrouent/Structur er Building Treatment B uGas Tank V aning Structu rPiping and VTunnels Reactor/Gen eChimney Sl aTurbine Su mTurbine Pit will be de cpurpose of nt Building (ed as the "

Rent and Fin ang Structur econfigurati oential for co ner is remove don, the FR SBuilding.

Tds to be a driately ave rs not partic uively higher was evaluat eng Structure in Table 6

-y low conta msmall in si zly does not pWater Reacto rPlan ments and Bnd surface ee uilding ault res Ventilation erator Plan t ab mp contaminate dose asses s(WTB), andRemaining Sal Radiatio nes. There ar eon, includi nntaining sig nd. This lead sS design ca nThe WTB haddressed se praged with tularly cond ucontamina ted separatel ys, which re q-1, the Rem amination po tze. Treating provide a m er Below Grou elevation is MateriremainConConConConConConConCond as neces ssment, the bd Waste Gas Structures".

Tn Survey (

Fe several rea sng a portion nificant res is to unique dn effectivel yas the highe sparately to the other s tucive to an eion potenti ay because th quires differ eaining Stru ctential. Two each of th eeaningful di s6-4 nd Structu r639 feet A Mial ning FlSuncrete ncrete ncrete ncrete ncrete ncrete ncrete ncrete sary to mee tbasements oTank Vault This create sFRS) design sons for thi sbelow the adual radioa cdose assess my accommodst contamin aensure tha ttructures. T hefficient FR Sal this loss oe floor is at ent modelin gctures consi sof the struc te basementsstinction in dres to Rem aMSL loor and W aurface Area511.54101.90460.04 177.07359.59117.865.647.09t the 10 C Fother than t ht (WGTV) a rs four separ a; Reactor Bs organizati oaverage wat ectivity after ment assum pdate a surve yation potent it the sourc ehe small si zS design an of efficienc ya lower ele vg parameter sst of a gro utures, the T us in the "R edose modeli nain in LAC Ball (m2) Fl(f4 0 4 7 9 6 FR 20.1402 he Reactor re grouped iate areas to Building, W on. The Rea cer table ele vall interior ptions and F Ry unit consi ial of all En de term in tze of the Wd impleme ny is conside rvation than ts. up of struct uurbine Sum pemaining St rng due to th eBWR End Sloor Elevati ofeet AMSL)612 630 621 629 629 635 618 618 unrestricte dBuilding, Winto one cat econsider in TB, WGTVctor Buildi nvation and aconcrete a nRS classific asting of on ld State stru cthe WTB isWTB struct untation but dred justified the WTB anures that all p and Turbi nructure" cat eeir generall yState on d use Waste egory dose V and ng has a very nd the ation. ly the ctures s not ure to due to . The nd the have ne Pit, egory y La CrossLicense TRevisionsimilar ewould reLTP ChaThe EndassociateCirculati ncirculati npiping is that penetunnel topenetrati

End StateAdminispiping, l High Preto G-3 Well waStorm WRemainiThe poteon the fi nLa Crossextensivesubsurfacmonitorincollectedplant-derbe perfoexposed. se Boiling WTermination n 0 elevations a nesult in unn eapter 5 for d id State wil led with cont ang Water Dng water di s defined as etrates walls o contain al lons. There i e is listed in TableDestration Buil dleach field la tessure Servi cater piping fo rWater Piping ing portion o fential for sig ndings of th ese Boiling e characteri zce soil co nng results d d under the Trived radion urmed after Water Reacto rPlan nd contami necessary co miscussion of also inclu daminated o pDischarge pi pscharge. Fo rthat containand is emb el systems pi ps no embed dTable 6-2.

e 6-2 Buescription of Pding Sanitary terals, and ta nce Water fro mr Well #3 f Circulating nificant sur fe EnergySo lWater Rea czation perf ontamination own gradie nTurbine Bu iuclides abo vthe Turbin er nation pote nmplexity in Fthe FRS pr ode a limite dperational sy pe which wr the purpo sed in soil.

Tedded in co nping that r aded piping p ruried Pipin gPiping System incl unks m LACBWR CWater Disch aface or subs ulutions Tech nctor Historicormed in 2 0under the nt of suspec tilding in th eve backgro ue Building 6-5 ntial. Treati nFRS design, ocess. d number ostems. The ewas used as se of this LTypical com mncrete. The dan between bresent. The bg to remain uding drain Crib House arge Pipe urface soil cnical Suppo rcal Site As s014 (see L TTurbine B uted broken de vicinity o fund. Full ch afoundation ng the Remimplement aof buried p exception is for liquid eLicense Ter mmercial po wdesign of th buildings w hburied pipi nin LACBW1042794709383 52contaminati ort Documen tsessment (HTP Chapter 2uilding bas edrain lines.

f the suspec taracterizatio is remove dmaining Str uation and doipes, with t the remain ieffluent dis cmination Pl awer plants al se LACBWRhich elimin ang to remain WR End Sta tQuantit4' of 4"Sche d57' of 2" P2500 gal sept i750 gal dosi n4 gal distribut8' perforated 144' 4" P V50' of 6"222' of 8511' of 395' of 2"8' of 48" con csteel grates a100' of 10" 25' of 60" st eon at LACB Wt (TSD) RS

-HSA) (2) a n2). There a ed on posi

tHowever, gt drain line son of the su bd and the u nuctures sepa rcumentatio nthe majorit ying portion ocharge as w ean (LTP),

bso contain pR plant incl uated the ne ein the LAC Bte y d. 40 PVC PVC ic tank ng tank ion tank 4" PVC VC " 8" 3" " crete pipe at grade PVC eel pipe WR is low b-TD-313196nd the resu lare indicatio ntive ground wgeoprobe sa ms did not id ebsurface soi lnderlying s orately n. See y not of the ell as buried piping udes a ed for BWR based 6-003, lts of ns of water mples entify l will oil is La CrossLicense TRevisionLow conbroken flocated dconcentracharacterlevels th aof groundF6.4.The "ReConsolidRadiologthe next DPC firs1949 an were acqtotal are aThe G-1 LACBWin 1987.

operationmeet cur projectedResident as it is b

the norththat wou the preseforeseeabproperty In summplans to infrastru c25 years

Finally, tdevelop the DPC plausiblediscussioLACBWse Boiling WTermination n 0 ncentrations ofloor drains down gradi ations. In la rization an dan found in dwater sam pFuture Lan deasonably F odated Deco mgical Criteri a100 years.

Tst acquired l aadditional 1 quired in 19 6a owned or c plant beg aWR construct i DPC's th in as a major rent enviro nd remaining ial use of th eounded by th, and a wildld be more sence of ove rble future re to recreatio nmary, the D Pchange the lcture to sup

p. Adjacent l there are lar gfor resident isite from i ne" in accor don of futur eWR dose asse Water Reacto rPlan of groundw aunder the Tent of the te 2012, fiv ed license te r1983, pred opling results

.d Use Scena roreseeable Smmissioning a (NUREG-The Reasona band at the s i8.6 acres w e62. Finally, acontrolled b yan operatio nion began i nird plant o ngeneration nmental stan operation li fe site over t hthe Mississi plife and fish suitable to a dr 36 acres o fsidential de vnal use at so PC site has bland use in tport the site sand, and a pge tracts of lial use with industrial use dance with land use, ssment is th er ater contami nTurbine Bui lTurbine B ue additional rmination.

Rominantly H

. rio and Av eScenario", i sGuidance 1757), (3),

Tbly Foresee aite in 1941t oere acquire dan addition ay DPC was t hn in 1941 an 1963, was nsite, G-3, bresource to dards and i sfe of G-3 is phe next 100 ppi River to refuge to t hdditional re sf closed coa lvelopment.

Bme point in been in con tthe future.

Ts future use fpart of the Dland nearby in at least t

h. Residentia NUREG-17the Averag ee Industrial W6-6 nation have lding. Gro uuilding ide nmonitoring Results indi c-3. See LT Perage Membs defined i n- Characte rTable 5.1 a sable Scenari oo build its f id for G-1 co aal 26.8 acres hen, and co nand was de ccompleted ibegan commthe DPC sy ss currently p projected to years appe athe west, a he south. Th esidential de vl ash landfi lBased on su rthe distant futinuous ind uThe site con tfor power s uDPC site is cthat would bhe next 100 l land use i s757, Table e Member oWorker.

been identi fundwater sa mntified cont awell pairs wcated lower P Chapter 2, ber of the Cn NUREG-1rization, S us a land use o for LACB irst coal-fir eal ash disp owas filled bntinues to b ecommission ein1967, and mercial oper astem. The Gerforming abe 20-25 y ears unlikely. rail line to tere are seve rvelopment t hlls further s urrounding l afuture is mo rustrial use f otains a tran supply after Gcurrently us be preferab lyear time ps therefore c

5.1 definit

iof the Criti fied adjacen tmpling in 1 amination awere install egroundwat esection 2.3

.Critical Gro u1757, Volu murvey, and Dscenario th aWR is indu sed generatio nosal. An add iby dredging e, 163.5 acr eed and dis mwas perma nation in 19 6G-3 plant ha sa major turb iears. The site is rthe east, U Sral small co mhan the DP Cupports the aand use, the cre likely tha nor 74 years smission sta tG-3 is deco med for recr ele, and mor eperiod than tategorized aions. Bas ecal Group (t to the sus p983 from aat relativel yed to suppo rer contami n.7 for a su mup me 2, Revis iDeterminati oat is likely wstrial use.

n station, G

-itional 80.8 in 1962-63.

es. mantled in nently shut d69 and con ts been upda tine overhau lrelatively is oSACE prope rmmunities n eC site. In ad dassumption conversion on residential and DPC h ation and val ummissioned ieational pur pe cost-effect ithe conversi as "less like led on the a(AMCG) fopected a well y low rt site nation mmary ion 1 on of within -1. In acres The 1989. down tinues ted to l. The olated rty to earby dition, of no of the use. as no uable in 20-poses. ive to on of ly but above or the La CrossLicense TRevisionD6.5.Dose molicense t25 mremmodel anThere areas followgroundwvery lowmajority

concrete currentlythe remairemain wcontamingroundwsummed An overvdescripti o6.5.1.BThe dosedesignateresidual rThe basealtered t oThe BFMthe concrExcavati The resumrem/yr group. It

portion rconserva6.5.1.1.The BFMresidual material installati oGroundwSpoils (Bse Boiling WTermination n 0 Dose Model odeling is p eermination wm/yr criterio nnd computat ie four potenws for the pwater. The i nw potential oof residual of backfill ey present at tining portio nwas not asso cnation. The water exposu ras applicab lview of the ons and res uBackfilled B ae model for ed as the Ba sradioactivit yement End So a conditio nM conceptu arete remain son geometr yults of the Bper mCi to tcannot be rremain in t hatively inclu dBFM M Insitu geo mradioactivit yand 2) exp oon of an on swater (BFM BFM Insitu dsWater Reacto rPlan Overview erformed to will not res

n. This secti oional methodntial sources purpose of dntact LACBof containi nradioactivi ted basemen tthe LACBWn of the Cir cciated with cpotential f ore factors wle to demon sdose assess mults are prov iasements backfilled bsement Fill My remaining iState will b en that woul dal model inc ls in the "as-y where so mBFM dose tal activity fruled out th ahe ground. de the sum oInsitu Scen ametry inclu dy as a resul tosure to dri lsite water s uInsitugw). T). r demonstrat eult in a do son provides ds for dose aof residual dose model iBWR Adminng significa nty to remai nts. There is WR site or wi culating Wa tcontaminate dor significa nwere calcula tstrate compl iment metho dided in secti obasements t oModel (BFMin the base me comprised d not realist iludes two s oleft" config ume or all of t hassessment sfor each of at a portion oTherefore, of the BFM Iario des two exp ot of leachin glling spoils upply well.

TThe drilling 6-7 e that resid use to the A Ma general o vassessment. radioactivit ying; backfil lnistration B unt levels of n at the ti mno indicati oll be presen tter Discharg ed systems a nnt groundw ated. The do siance with t hds for the f oons 6.7 to 6

.o remain bel oM). The BF Mments. of backfilleically allow ource term guration at t hhe concrete i s are expre sthe three bof the backf ithe final d oInsitu and B Fosure scenar ig from the bthat are br oThe well w aspoils scen aual radioacti vMCG (indusverview of t hy in the En dled baseme nuilding will residual ra dme of licens eon that sig nt in the End e Pipe, the l ind is expect eater contam ise from eac hhe 25 mrem

/our sources

.17. ow 636 foo tM calculate sed concrete sthe remaini ngeometries; 1he time of li is excavated ssed as Do sasements a nfilled structu rose for de mFM Excavatios; 1) expo backfilled c ought to the ater scenario ario is desig nvity remainistrial work ehe LACBWd State that nts, soil, b ualso remai ndioactivity, e terminati onificant soil State. Wit himited buri eed to contai nination is a lh of the fo u/yr dose crit eis provided t elevation (s the dose to structures t hng structure1) the Insit ucense termi nand brough tse Factors (nd the Rem ares could b emonstrating tion dose.

sure to well oncrete sur fsurface du ris designat enated as BF Mng at the ti mer) exceedi nR site conc ewere categ ouried piping n intact but if any. Th eon will be i ncontaminat ih the except ied piping th an minimal, i flso very lo wur sources werion. below. De t(see Table 6 the AMCG hat are phys is to be occ uu geometry wnation and 2t to the surf a(DF) in un iaining Stru ce excavated complianc ewater cont afaces into t hring the ass ued as BFM IM Insitu D rme of ng the eptual orized , and has a e vast n the ion is ion of at will f any, w but will be tailed -1) is from ically upied. where 2) the ace. its of ctures and a e will aining he fill umed Insitu rilling La CrossLicense TRevisionThe concfloors anwith theradioacti vrelease owater supand flowa clean cdirect expathway The BFMare brougterminatiThe resiinstallati obrought tpathwaysThe BFM(RESRAspreadshassessmebasementat the ti mfor each

with the 6.5.1.2.The BFMexcavateconservacredit fo rassumed which is contaminExcavati mrem/yr the averaare not e x BFM Ex"Remainse Boiling WTermination n 0 ceptual mo dnd walls is r concrete svity is rele aoccurs immepply well is w to the well cover of at lxposure and to the indus M Insituds sceght to the s uion, before aidual radio aon is assu mto the grou ns are the sa mM Insitugw dAD) v7.0 meet calculat ients are exp rt (and the R eme of licens eRadionucli d25 mrem/yr BFM M Excavati od and spre atism, the ex cr radioactiv eto inadvert econsistent wnation. Th eon DFs that per total m age concent rxceeded. xcavation D Fning Structu rWater Reacto rPlan del for the Beleased to asurfaces aft eased instantl ediately afte rassumed to is conserva tleast 3 feet isoil ingesti otrial worker enario assu murface. The any leaching activity in ted to be in and surface, ame as those t hdose assess mmodel. The ions couple dressed as D Femaining St e terminatio nde of Conce rdose criteri oExcavation on scenario aad on the cavation is ae decay. Th ently mix wwith the gu ie calculatio nare express eCi. The fu nration in the Fs were cal cres" consiste nr BFM Insitu gwadjacent fill er backfill.

y into the fir license te r be installe dtively mode lis present o von/inhalatio nAMCG is dmes that the dwell install afrom concr ethe floor c oadvertently mand spread o hat apply to ment is impl eBFM Insit ud with RES RFs in units oructures) (s en, as determ irn (ROC), a non. Scenario assumes th aground sur assumed to oe residual r awith the ma sidance in N Un is perfor med in the sa mndamental dexcavated cculated sep ant with the B6-8 w scenario athrough lea cThe scena rfill which is rmination ta kd adjacent t oled assumin gver potentia ln is negligi bdrinking wat edrilling spo iation is ass uete occurs a noncrete tha tmixed with tver a 15 c mcontaminat eemented usi nuds dose asRAD modeliof mrem/yree Table 6-1 ined by the Fnd summed at some or aface at so moccur imme dadioactivity ss of struct uUREG-1757med using Eme units as tdriver of the concrete is l iarately for t hBFM Insitu Dassumes tha tching into wrio assumes then treate dking no cre do the down gg that struct ully contami nble or zero.

er from the oils from the iumed to oc cnd taking n ot is contac tthe fill mat em thick laye red surface s ong the RESsessment i sing. The re sper mCi to t). The inve nFRS, will b eas necessar yall of the ba cme time af tdiately after remaining i nural concret e7, Appendix Excel spre athe DFs for tBFM Excavimited such the Reactor BDF calculat it the residu awater that c othat 100%d as conta mdit for radi ogradient ed gures are not nated surfa cThe BFM Ionsite well. installation ocur immedi ao credit for r ated by the erial above tr. The BFM oil. idual RADi s implemensults of the tal activity i ntory of resi de multiplied y, to demon sckfilled str uter license license ter mn the backfi e removed dJ, for addr eadsheet and the BFM In svation DF cthat the sur fBuilding, Wions. al radioactiv iomes into c o% of the re sminated soil.

oactive deca yge of the bu ipresent. Be cces the dose Insitugw expof the onsit eately after li cadioactive dborehole dthe floor su rInsituds expoactive mat nted using EBFM Insitu nventory in dual radioa cby the BF Mstrate comp lucture concr etermination mination taki nlled baseme during exca vessing subs uresults in situ scenari ocalculation i sface soils D CWTB, WGTVity in ontact sidual The y. A ilding cause from osure e well cense decay. during rface, osure erials Excel dose each ctivity M DFs liance ete is . For ng no nts is vation urface BFM o, i.e., s that CGLs V, and La CrossLicense TRevision6.5.2.SDerived Cradioacti vused to pFor conscontainedcm woulcontaminmodelingUsing a contaminpotential

a clean s oIn the uduring FdiscovereCommissStandardwith guid6.5.3.BWith thepiping tocontaminconducteThe conctwo sceninternal slayer of sthe soil mthe pipe e2.54 cm transportDischargassumes layer of sand Excascenariosin units ose Boiling WTermination n 0 oil Concentrati ovity in surf aperform the cservatism, ad in a 1 m d eld result in nation is id eg may be re1 m thicknation with for subsur faoil layer ov eunlikely eve nFSS that a red geometri esion (NRC) wd methods f odance in N UBuried Pipi ne exception oo remain anation pote ned to develo pceptual mod narios: Insit usurfaces of tsoil in an ar emixing laye rexcavation. layer of soi t and migrat ige Pipe whi that the pi psoil on the gavated soil

s. RESRAD of dpm/100 cWater Reacto rPlan on Guidelin eace soils th acalculation.

and to opti mepth from t hlower dose entified at Lquired if thekness redu ca thicknes sface contami ner a contami nnt that geo mre not bou nes will be a dwill be noti for RESRAD UREG-1757.

ng of the porti oat LACBWRntial is min ip DCGLs fo rel for the b uu and Exca vthe pipe is aea equal to t hr is 15 cm dThe Insitu s cl with no c rion. This is ach will be pe is excava tground surfavia the sa mmodeling i scm2. r e Levels (D Cat correspo n mize remedhe surface.

A(i.e., highe rLACBWR we conceptu aces the po ts somewhat nation to re mnated soil la ymetries are nded by th eddressed by fied if additi oparameter sThe AMCGon of the C iR was assoimal (see Tr pipe.

uried piping vation. In t hassumed to ihe internal sdue to the e xcenario ass uredit taken foa conservati vfilled with ted followe dce with no cme pathway ss used in co n6-9 CGLs), in u nnd to the 25 diation effi cA standard s ur DCGL). Hwith a thick nal model ass utential for greater tha main in the yer at depth

.encountere de assumed additional monal modeli nselection an dG for soil is t hirculating Wociated wit hTable 6-2).

dose assess mhe Insitu s cinstantaneo usurface area xtensive gr oumes that th efor the prese ve assumpti oa flowable d by instant cover. The I ns applicable njunction wi tnits of pCi/gmrem/yr d ociency, sur faurface soil c However, in ness greater umed a 15 delays or an 15 cm i sEnd State

w. d during c o1 m soil c modeling.

Tng is requir ed uncertaint yhe Industria lWater Disch ah contamin aA buried pment is sim icenario the rusly release aof the pipe.

ound surfac ee released ra ence of the pon, particul afill materi arelease of andustrial W o to the BF Mth Excel spr g, were deve lose criterio nface soil is ontaminatiothe unlike lthan 15 c mcm contam iunnecessar ys encounter ewith a geom eontinuing c hontaminatio The U.S. N ued. y analysis a rl Worker. arge Pipe, n oated syste mpiping dose ilar to the Bresidual ra dand mix wi tFor the Ex ce disturbanc edioactivity ipipe to redu carly for the Cal. The Ex call radioacti vorker is exp oM and soil readsheet to loped for re sn. RESRADdefined a son thickness ly event th am additional ination thic ky remediati oed. There i setry compri sharacterizati oon thicknes suclear Regu lre used cons one of the bms and the rassessmen tBFM and in cdioactivity o nth a thin 2.

5cavation sce ne associate dis a below g rce environ mCirculating Wcavation sc evity into a 1 osed to the Idose asses scalculate D Csidual D was s that of 15 at soil dose kness. on if s low sed of on or s, the latory istent buried refore t was cludes n the 54 cm nario, d with round mental Water enario 5 cm Insitu sment CGLs La CrossLicense TRevision6.5.4.EGroundwlicense t eLow levewell pairgroundwcontamin6.5.5.RThe LASwitchyacontain rin NUREand Equi6.5.6.DThe varioexclusiveBFM Insthe activwith the encounteThe dos simultanedemonstrfollowingmaximmaximsum omaximmaximmaxim6.5.7.AAs discuforeseeabuse scenawell and A qualitalower thase Boiling WTermination n 0 Existing Growater monit oermination.

Tels of H-3 a nrs were inst awater concen nation prese nRemaining AACBWR Adard Fire Se rresidual ra dEG-1575, S uipment ManuDose Summaous source te. For exa msitu drilling vity released groundwat eering the wee from soi eously with rate compli ag using the mmum BFM Imum BFM Eof the BFM mum soil d omum buriedmum existi nAlternate Sc ussed in s eble" scenari oarios were c oonsite gard eative evalu aan that calc uWater Reacto rPlan oundwater oring has b eThe final m ond Sr-90 havalled at the s itration are pnt at license Above Groudministrativ evice Water dioactivity.

Tupplement 1 ual (MARSAation for C oterms and c omple, althou gspoils scen ato ground wer activity rll. Therefor el, buried pthe BFM d oance with t hmean values Insituds doseExcavation dInsitugw dosose, d piping dos eng groundw aenarios ection 6.4, o based on ponsidered inen. ation of a re ulated for th er een and wi lonitoring da tve been ide nite. Ground wprovided to termination

,und Buildin ge Building, System wil lThey will b, Multi-Age AME) (4) .

ompliance onceptual mgh a low pr oario and sub swater in the released fr oe, the BFM iping, and ose scenari ohe 25 mrem

/from FRS:

e, dose, e from all b ae, ater dose.

the indust rpast and pro jncluding rec rcreational l ae industrial u6-10 ll continue tte will depe nntified in sa mwater expos uperform d o, if any.

gs LACBWRl remain in tbe free rel ency Radiati omodels discu obability, a sequently e xBFM Insit uom another Insitugw dosgroundwat eos. Therefor e/yr dose crit asements co mrial use sc ejected use oreational us eand use sce nuse scenario to be cond und on the e vmples collec ture factors i nose assessm eR Crib Houtact. The beased in ac con Survey aussed above given basemxcavated. A nugw scenario basement t hse will be s uer could al se, the final sterion will i nmbined, enario was of the LAC Be, and resid enario concl ubecause oc cucted until valuation of ted since 20 n units of ment for exis tuse and Tuildings ar ecordance w iand Assess mare not nec ement could bnother exa mfor one bashat is dow nummed acroso be viewsite-wide d onclude the sselected aBWR site. T wential use wi tuded that thcupancy tim esometime bsampling r e12 after fiv emrem/yr per pting ground wTurbine Bu ie not expec tith the gui dment of Mat eessarily mutbe subject tmple could b esement comn gradient boss all basemwed as occ uose assessm esummation oas a "reaso nwo alternat eth a water s uhe dose wo ue would be l before esults. e new pCi/L water ilding ted to dance erials tually to the e that mbines before ments. urring ent to of the nably e land upply uld be ess La CrossLicense TRevisionthan thatthe recre than assuThe residscenario

spreadshstates th aassurancesection 6M6.6.A comprpresent athat havecharacterthe primaThe initi aand BFMthe soil DROC thadescribed6.6.1.PEnergySoDecommdocumenReactor MAround Decommfuel inve10 CFR PThe list oafter eli mwith theoCo-60 ansamples) coupled several apresent dFinally,

Piping anwere not se Boiling WTermination n 0 t assigned t oational land umed for the dent garde nas defined ieet, to calc uat if the pea ke that the sc 6.15. Mixture Fra rehensive "

iat the LAC Be not been rization but ary radionu cal suite mix tM DF dose a sDCGLs andat will be cd in section 6Potential Ra olutions TSissioning (5nts were re vMaterials, (6Commerciaissioning A sentory asses sPart 61 was tof activatio nminating no boretical neu tnd Ni-63 (t

h. The revi ewith revie wadditional raduring the d ethe results ond Ventilati oalready acc oWater Reacto rPlan o an industr iuse scenari industrial wner land us ein NUREG-ulate the do sk dose fro menario is un lctions for I ninitial suite' BWR site.

Apositively could theor eclide which iture fraction sssessments.

d BFM DFs considered d6.5.6. dionuclide sSD RS-TD-5) establish eviewed inc l6), and NU Ral Nuclearssessment (7sment cond ute stream an an product r able gases, ra dtron activat ihe promine new of Refe rw of the LA Cadionuclide secommissio nof concrete on Tunnels ounted for br al worker. o the recrea tworker. e was consi d1757, Table se from the Rm a less likel ylikely woul dnitial Suite of 21 radi As discussed identified i netically be pis Cs-137.

s were used The initial sto identify during the Fs of Concer n-313196-00 1ed an initi aluding NURREG/CR-428r Power 7). The revi eucted in 198 8alyses were aadionuclides dionuclides wion product snt activatio nrence 6, w hCBWR fuel s being incl uning of LACcore sampl were revie wby the assess m6-11 In addition, tional user' sdered to b e5-1. RESR AResident G ay put plausi bd be necessa rRadionucli donuclides wbelow, the in LACBWRpresent, albein the RES Rsuite mixtur ethe insigni fFRS and fi nn and Initia l1, Radionucal suite of pREG/CR-34789, ResidualPlants; Oew also incl u8 that was dalso review efor consid ewith half-li vs with abun dn products i dhich include inventory auded in th eBWR. es collecte dwed. No rad iments descr i if a water ss intake rate e a "less li kAD was useardener alte rble scenari ory. The alte rdes were identifi initial suite R 10 CFR it at very l oRAD uncert ae fractions wficant dose cnal dose s ul Suite clides of Cpotential R O74, Long-Lil Radionucli dOrigin, Di suded an ev adecay corre ced. eration in th eves less than dances less dentified in s both acti vand 10 CFR e list of tho d from the Wionuclides wibed above.

supply well from the wkely but pl aed, in conju nrnate scenar io is "signifi crnate scenar iied that co uincludes m aPart 61 a now mixture fainty analys ewere used in contributors ummation f oConcern DOC. Two inived Activa tde Concent rstribution, aluation of a cted to Janu ae initial sui ttwo years, athan 0.01 p eLACBWR vation and Part 61 an aose that cou WTB, Reactwere positiv e were instal lwell would b eausible" lan dnction with Eio. NUREG-cant" then g rio is addres suld potential any radionu cnalysis or dfractions, re les for Soil Dconjunctio n and final l or complian cDuring LACndustry gui dtion Produ cration Withi nInventory, LACBWR ary 2015. S ete was deve land radionu cercent relat i10 CFR Pafission pro dalyses resul tld be pote ntor Buildin gely identifie dled in e less d use Excel -1757 reater sed in ly be clides during lative DCGL n with ist of ce as CBWR dance cts in n and and spent everal loped clides ive to art 61 ducts, ted in ntially g and d that La CrossLicense TRevisionThe resuin Table 6.6.2.MAs descrdevelopeWTB, an1.27 cm fractions

fractions MinimumconcentraprovidedThe mixtfraction justified

across co se Boiling WTermination n 0 lting list of p6-3. The pr Mixture Fra ribed in R eed from con cnd Piping/V eslices from . The use o fassigned t om Detectab lation data a vd in Table 6-3Tture was ba sfor all buil din Referen cores from th eWater Reacto rPlan potentially pocess for de tctions for I nference 5, tcrete core d aentilation T uthe cores wf cores wit ho low abun dle Concent rvailable. T h3. Table 6-3 sed on a co mdings. The ace 5 by a r ee different a rr present radi otermining t hnitial Suite the mixture ata collecte dunnels. The which were t hh higher co ndance radio nration (MD he mixture f rInitial S uand MixNuclideH-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244Total mpilation of 1application oeview of C sreas. The po t6-12 onuclides is he mixture f rRadionucli d fractions fd during ch avast majori therefore us encentrations nuclides we rC) values ractions assi guite of Pote nxture FractMixtFract0.0000.0000.0020.0100.0120.0800.0090.0000.0000.8770.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0030.0000.0000.0001.012 cores fro mof the comb s-137/Sr-90 tential effec tcalled the "

Iractions is d edes for the Init iaracterizatio nty of the ac ted to deter mwas requir ere not overl ywhich wer egned to the Intial Radio ntions ture tions 071 065 294 038 221 048 907 008 015 736 093 080 045 014 013 306 037 004 005 00 m all buildi nbined data t oratios whi ct of uncerta iInitial Suite "escribed bel oial Suite ra dn from the Rtivity was l omine the rad ied to ensure y influence de in many Initial Suite nuclides ngs to deter mo determine ch were rel ainty in the m" and is pro vow. dionuclides Reactor Bui located in th eionuclide m ithat the m id by the re pcases the radionuclid emine one m ithe mixtur eatively cons mixture fract ivided were lding, e first ixture ixture ported only es are ixture e was istent ions La CrossLicense TRevisionon the fi nmixture iuncertainbecause Complianconcentraemitters insignifi csoil DCGthat is p odemonstrThe primDetect (HFRS. Hoconservafraction.

There wpredominevaluatioless than HTD radMDC vaTherefor soil and ucontributsufficien tS6.7.Site-spec10 CFR 2radionuc percentagThe surfuniformlyexpectatigeometrywith conc6.7.1.SThere is

based onsubsurfacmonitorinse Boiling WTermination n 0 nal complia nis comprise dnty in the m ithe FRS fnce with th ations for gthat were cant contrib uGLs and Bu rositively ide nration. mary source oHTD) mixtuowever, the ative and pr See section were only anantly Cs-1 on of the rel athe MDC.

Wdionuclides talue which ce, the radio nused to dete rtor dose per t margin to aoil Dose As cific DCGL s20.1402 do slide in orde rge and the f iface soil c oy contamin aions that at y consisting centrations eoil Source Tlimited pot en the resul tce soil co nng results d oWater Reacto rPlan nce dose ca ld of Cs-137 ixture fracti ofor structur ee 25 mrem/

ygamma-beta designated utor dose c aried Pipe D ntified duri nof potential ure fractions method us eovides suff i6.13 for the a few posi37, and th ative mixtur eWhen the C that are not could be or dnuclide mixt urmine the s ocentage ass iaccount for msessment a ns were deve lse criterion r to provide inal list of R onceptual mated 1 m la ythe time o fof a clean exceeding t hTerm ential for si gts of soil cntamination own gradien tr lculations i swhich is a ons for Cs-1 es and soi lyr dose cri temitters.

Nas insignifi alculation a nCGLs. The g FRS will bdose impac tbecause th eed to calcul aicient marg iassessment itive soil se concentr ae fractions fos-137 conce positively iders of mag nure fraction soil ROC. H oigned to soi lmixture unc end DCGL loped for re sof 25 mrem

/an input to OC. model assu myer of soil f license te rsurface lay ehe surface s ognificant su rcharacteriza tunder the t of suspect e6-13 s minimized beta-gamm a37, or any ol will be pterion will bNote that t hcant contri bnd the corr eadditional dbe directly c t from mixt uere will be nate the insi gin to accou nof insignifi csample res uations were for the HTD ntrations ar eidentified a rnitude highe s determine dowever, as dl is demons tertainty.

sidual radio a/yr. A DC Gthe determ imes that th efrom the g rrmination r eer of soil o voil DCGL.

rface or sub ion perfor mTurbine B ued broken d rby the fact a emitter. T other beta-g aperformed ube demonst rhe dose co nbutors is a lesponding a ddose from a ncalculated a nure uncertai nno analysis ognificant c ont for unce rcant contrib uults identif iinsufficie nradionuclid ee low the re lre artificiall yer than the ad from the c odescribed in trated to be activity in s GL was cal ination of i ne soil cont around surfa cesidual radi over a conta msurface soil med in 201 4uilding bas erain lines. H othat the va sThere is no damma emitti using gammrated using ntribution f rlready acco udjustments tny beta-ga mnd included inty is limit eof HTD rad iontributor dortainty in t hutor dose pe ried during nt to provi des which w elative mixtu ry increased actual conce noncrete cor esection 6.1 3conservati vurface soil tculated for nsignificant camination i sce downwar doactivity wi minated sub scontaminat i4. There a red on posi towever, geo st majority odose impact ng radionuc ma spectros cactual mea rom beta-g aunted for i nto the BFM mma radion uin the comp led to the Ha rionuclides dose percent ahe HTD mircentage. characteriz ade a meaniere all repor tre fractions odue to usi nntrations pr ees were appl i3 the insigni fve and to pr othat represe neach initial contributors s contained

d. There a rill remain wsurface soil ion at LAC Bre indicatio ntive ground wprobe samp lof the from lides, copy. sured amma n the DFs, uclide liance rd-to-during age is ixture ation, ingful ted as of the ng the esent. ied to ficant ovide nt the suite dose in a re no with a layer BWR ns of water les La CrossLicense TRevision collectedplant-dercontinuinsoil expoSoil charbiased sucollected137 abovindicatedsamples 60 result 6.7.2.SThe AMapply: DirecInhalIngesIngesThe agrimilk, graS6.8.The RESfor the EnergySoFactors (6.8.1.PRESRADbelong tolocation site-spec

characterexposureBehaviorfor the s

changed LACBWfor both tse Boiling WTermination n 0 d under the Trived radio nng character iosed. racterizatio nurface soil s ad inside the Lve the MDCd Co-60 abo vindicated C ss greater th aoil Exposu rCG at the Lct exposure tlation of air bstion of soil stion of wat ecultural an dain and vege toil DCGL CSRAD modelmodeling olutions TS(8). Parameter SD parameter so more tha nof the sourc ific) includi ristics of at me to, the dos eral paramet eite. For th e(e.g., para mWR, the beh athe BFM an dWater Reacto rPlan Turbine Bu inuclides ab oization after n results are amples and 7LSE fence.

TC with a m ave the MDCs-137 abov ean MDC. Th ere PathwaysLACBWR sto external r aborne radioa cer from onsi td gardening table ingesti Computatiol was used t odiscussed D RS-TD-3Selection Pr os are classi fin one categ oe term and tng the geo hmospheric a ne receptor ar eers define th ee same gro umeters for avioral para md soil dose ar ilding in th eove backgrthe Turbin eprovided in 79 subsurfa cThirteen of taximum of C with a ma xe MDC with e Cs-137 re ss and Criti cite is the I nadiation ctivity te well pathways aon pathway son Model -

Ro calculate Dbelow are313196-004, ocess fied as behavory. Physi cthe geologic hydrologic, gnd biosphe re also consi de receptor's up of recept oindustrial umeters are b aassessments.

6-14 e vicinity o fround. Sub se Building f oLTP Chapt ece soil samp lthe surface s1.07 pCi/g.

ximum of 0.a maximumsults are all ical Group ndustrial W oare not appl is are theref oRESRAD v7DCGLs for se provided LACBWR vioral, meta bcal paramet eal character igeochemica lric transport dered physi cbehavior c oors, a para muse could b eased on an i f the suspec tsurface soil oundation is er 2 and su mles (at varyi nsoil sample aTwo of th e287 pCi/g.

Fm of 0.161 pin the range orker. The foicable to in dore not inclu d7.0 surface soil.

d electroni cSoil DCGLbolic or phy ers are dete ristics of the l, and mete oup to, but cal input par aonsidering t hmeter value ce different industrial u st drain line sl will be es removed a nmmarized h eng depths to analyses res ue surface s oFifteen of t hpCi/g with n of natural b afollowing e xdustrial lan dded. The RESRAcally in c oL and Concsical. Som ermined by t hsite (i.e., so orologic ch anot includi nameters.

he conceptu acould chan gfrom resid ese scenario as did not id eevaluated dnd the unde rere. A total six meters) ults indicate oil sample r ehe subsurfac eno subsurfac eackground.

xposure pat hd use. The mAD output r eonjunction crete BFM e parameter she geometr yurce-specifi aracteristics.

ng, uptake bal model se lge if the sc eential use).

and are the entify during rlying of 22 were d Cs-esults e soil e Co-hways meat, eports with Dose s may y and c and The by, or lected enario For same La CrossLicense TRevisionMetaboliset of mePhysical,dose moduses singselectionArgonne Priority 1ranking iProbabilPriority 3from the either asparametesite-spec from thePriority 1negativelnegativeland positto positi vthan 0.25ConsistenparameteContaminTable 6.8Figure 6-determinto determ6.8.2.RThe uncerounded radionuc respectivSection Ifor. The

practical

with the for selec tAttachmefor the u nse Boiling WTermination n 0 ic paramete retabolic par a, behavioral deling to ca lgle values f on process is dNational L1 parameter sis documen tlistic RESR A3 physical pparameter dsigned site

-er distributi oific parame te RESRAD 1 and 2 pa rly correlate dly correlate dtively correl vely correla t5 were assig nnt with th eers were ass ination Fro87. -7 provides nistic param emine the fin aRESRAD Paertainty ana lmixture fr alides, and e nve mixture fI.7.5 and en sthreshold oimplement aobjective o ftion of dete rent 6-1 pro vncertainty a nWater Reacto rPlan rs define ce rameters appl iand metabo llculate soil Dor input pa rdescribed be lLaboratory (s have the hted in Attac hAD 6.0 and Rparameters wdistributions specific de tons defined iter distribut iuncertainty rameters.

Ad to dose.

Td parameter sated to dos eted paramet ened the med e guidance igned the m eom Decoma flow cheters and pa rl determinis tarameter S elysis includ eactions of 0ntered into Rfactions. Th isures that th eof 0.1% fo ration of the Rf identifying rministic par vides a tabl enalysis. The r rtain physio lies to both t hlic paramet eDCGLs (andameters an dlow. (ANL) rankhighest pote hment B to tRESRAD-BUwere assign edefined in Nterministic vin NUREG/Cions. The Panalysis w A PRCC vaThe 25th percs. A PRCCe. The 75 th pers. Priority ian value o f in NUREGean values frmmissioning hart of the rameter dist rtic paramet eelection for Ued all of th e0.1% or gr eRESRAD foris approach e sensitiviti er including RESRAD unsensitive p aameters thr oe with the d ereferences o6-15 logical char ahe BFM anders are treat ed BFM DFs)d generates aked physica lntial impac tthe ANL re pUILD 3.0 Co med either a sNUREG/CRvalues, eval uCR-6697, o rPartial Rank ere used to alue less t hcentile of th eC value gre apercentile o f1 and 2 par afthe parame tG-1757, se cfrom NUREGParameterparameter ributions is uer set used t oUncertaint ye initial suit eeater. The cr the uncert ais consiste nes of the sig nradionuclid encertainty a narameters foough the un ceterministic or justificati oacteristics o fd soil dose a sed as determ i). The dete ra single val l parameter st on dose a nport, NURE mputer Cod esite-specific R-6697. Pri ouated by u nr evaluated bCorrelatio nevaluate t hhan -0.25 we parameter ater than +0

.f the param eameters wit hter distributi ction I.6.4.2

,G/CR-5512 r Analysisselection p rused in a R Eo calculate s oy Analysis e radionucli concentratio ainty analys nt with the nificant radi oes was pri mnalysis mod ur significan tcertainty an avalues and ons for the pf the potent issessments.

inistic para mrministic m olue for dose s by priorit ynd Priority 3EG/CR-6697

,es, (NUREGvalue or t hority 1 and 2 ncertainty a nby uncertai nn Coefficie nhe relative swas conside rdistributio n.25 was co neter distribu th a PRCC a bion. , metabolic Vol. 3, Resi(NUREG/rocess. The ESRAD Uncoil DCGLs. des from T ans assigne dis, were val uguidance i nonuclides a rmarily appli eule but is als t radionucli dalysis is disc uparameter dparameter se lial receptor.

meters in th eodule of the

. The para my as 1, 2, 3 the least.

, Developm eG/CR-6697) he median v parameters nalysis usin nty analysis unt (PRCC) vsensitivity ored sensitiv en was assig nnsidered sen tion was ass ibsolute valu eand behavidual Radio a/CR-5512) set of se lcertainty An a able 6-3 th ad to the se lues equal to n NUREG-re fully acco ued to facili to fully cons des. The rati ussed belo wdistributions lections are One e final code meter or 3. This ent of (9). values were g the using values of the e and ned to sitive igned e less vioral active (10) lected alysis at had lected their 1757, unted tate a istent onale w. used listed La CrossLicense TRevisionin Attachand the gwith theparameteThe contspecific sto ensurethan the from RefContaSoil DSoil PSoil ESaturA site-spparameteSupport HydrologThe Inha5512, Taequates tInhalatioA similarindustria residenti arate for aThe RES6697 AttAssuminmajority

report Usand 25 (2190*.7(2190*.2Site-specPumpingLACBW129 foot

The 33.1be represse Boiling WTermination n 0 hment 6-1.

Tgeneric par a process fl oer distributi otaminated a rsoil type is se efficient retypical def aference 1 w eaminated Z oDensity, Porosity, Effective Po rated Zone Hpecific dete rer based on Document gical Param alation Rate able 5.1.1 w hto 23 m3/d. n Rate (m3/yr process w al worker. N Ual user whic a worker as fSRAD paramt. C, Table ng 5 days a of industri aser's Manu a% outdoo75)/(24*365

)25)/(24*365

)cific parame tg Rate Para mWR. The wel ldepth is 10 9 m depth is asented by a nWater Reacto rPlan The basis f oameter distr iow chart i nons are disc urea was ass usand. The d emediation (

iault value oere applied:

one Hydraul irosity, Hydraulic G rrministic va la calculati o14-006, C oeters in Sup pparameter fohich provid e The inhal ayr) = 23 m3/das followed UREG/CR-5h correspon dfollows: 1.3 1meters Indo o7.6-1, whi cweek and al work is eal for RESR Ars. The ) = .1875) = 0.0625.

ter distribut imeters. Ther el depths are 9 feet (33.1 massumed to bnominal 20 fr or the beha vibutions (N Un Figure 6-ussed in mor eumed to be t hepth of soil cif necessary

)of 0.15 m. Tic Conducti vradient. lue was als oon perform eonestoga R oport of Dos efor the indus tes an annual ation rate th d ÷ 24h/d

  • 2to determi n5512, Table ds to 1.31 L

/1 L/d

  • 250 wor and Outd och recomme50 weeks pexpected to AD Version correspondi5. The Ouions were d ee are two ex i116 feet a nm) below t hbe maximumfoot screen d6-16 vioral and mUREG/CR-67. The basie detail belowhe full 750 0contaminati o) and FRS i f The followi nvity, o selected foed for a sa novers & Ase Modeling ftrial worker inhalation re industrial 2000 h/y =

1ne the Drink 6.87, provi d/d. This rate work days/y oor Time Frnds a medi aper year, th ibe indoors.

6 (12) , 75

%ng RESRAutdoor Timeveloped fo risting onsite nd 129 feet bhe average wm well dept hdepth (6.08 mmetabolic pa r6697) are st ris for the sw. 0 m2 area inson was cons ef contaminat ing site-spec ifor the "Sat und soil type ssociates (

Cfor the Zion RAMCG warate of 8400

/worker wa s1917 m3/yr.king Water I ndes a water e was conser vyr = 327 L/y rractions wer ean indoor wis equates t oConsistent

% of work t iAD Indoome Fractio nr the Well Pe industrial wbelow the gwater table e lh. The mini mm) starting a trameters (N Uraightforwa rsite-specific side the LS Eervatively a sion is foun dific determi nurated Zone in ZionSolCRA) ReporRestoration as derived fr o/y for a resi ds then calc untake Rate pintake rate ovatively ap pr. e derived fr owork day o fo 2190 houwith Table ime is assu mor Fractio nn is thenPump Intak ewater supply ground surfa clevation wh imum well de pt the averag eUREG/CR-5rd and cons parameter sE fence. Th essumed to b ed at depths g rnistic para me Field Cap alutions Techrt, EvaluatioProject (11)om NUREGdential user

.ulated as fol parameter f oof 478 L/yr plied as the i nom NUREGf 8.76 hour8.796296e-4 days <br />0.0211 hours <br />1.256614e-4 weeks <br />2.8918e-5 months <br /> surs per year

.2-3 of the med to be in dn parameten calculate de Depth and wells supp oce (bgs) (1) ich is 20 fee tpth is assu me water tabl e5512) istent s and e site-e 1 m reater meters acity" hnical on of ). G/CR-. This lows: or the for a ntake G/CR-s/day. . The ANL doors er = d as Well orting . The t bgs. med to e La CrossLicense TRevisionelevationbetween similar tdistribut iNUREG/variabili tpumpingdevelopepersons oassumingwhich eqactual wato providThe remawith the p6.8.3.SThe full ReferencThe uncewere senThe sensdistribut iFour MajprovidedNUREG/determinTable 6-paramete N se Boiling WTermination n 0 n. The mod e6.08 m and to the NURion. /CR-6697 d ty. For an in dg rate is in ced. NUREGof 328.7 m3/g four work quates to164 ater use at ade a range th aining para mprocess flo woil DCGL URESRAD Uce 8. The un certainty ana lnsitive whic hsitive para mions in She pajor Soil Ty pd in Referen c/CR-6697 dnistic values 5). The un cers evaluate dTable 6-4Radionuclid eCs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Note 1: NS indi cWater Reacto rPlan e of the re c33.1 m whi cREG/CR-66oes not pro vdustrial use cluded in tG-6697, Tab l/yr. This va lers. A nom i3.5 m3/yr. Tan unknown at can be us emeters in A tw chart in Fi gUncertaint yUncertainty Rcertainty an alysis results h are listed, meter for Cs

-ppard and T hpes: A Com pce 13 and wdistribution.

for sand fr ocertainty an ad are listed i n4 Determused ine Kd in ConZone 75th NS1 75th cates non-sen s r commended ch is 19.6 m 97 distribu tvide a reco mscenario, th ethe uncerta ile 3.10-1 ap plue is assu minal maxim uThese mini mfuture indu sed to deter mttachment 6

-gure 6-7.

y Analysis RReport for S oalysis result sfor the Kd along with

-137 was a shibault, Defapendium, (13was therefor eAll non-s eom Referen alysis result sn Table 6-6.

ministic Va ln to calcul ataminated 1460 NS 7302 itive paramete6-17 triangular

d. Note that t htion values mmended ve pump rate inty analysi plies a sanit amed to be th eum rate is amum and ma xstrial facilit ymine if the d o-1 not disc uResults oil DCGL p as are provid eparameters the selecte dssigned the ault Soil/Sol i) which are e assigned t hensitive K dce 13 as li ss and the s elues selecte date Soil DC GKd in UnsZone NS 75th NS r distribution he site-spec iof 6, 10, alue for we depends on s a nomin aary and pot ae minimum assumed ba sximum valu ey on the site ose is sensiti vussed above arameters i sed in Tables indicated t hd determinis t75th percentid /Liquid P alisted in Re he 75th percd parameter ssted in NU Relected dete rd for Sensit GLs saturated NS 7302 NS is assumed ific distribu tand 30 foell pumping industry. T oal uniform able water u sindustrial wsed on supp les are not i nafter licensve to well p uwere select s provided e l6-4 to 6-6.

hat only thr etic paramet etile value f rartition Co efeference 8.

Eentile value s were ass REG-6697, Trministic va live Kd par aKd in Satu rZone NS NS NS to be mid-tion is reaso nor the tria nrate due to o ensure tha tdistributio nsage rate fo rwell pumpin gly to 20 w ontended to p re terminati oumping rate ed in accor dlectronicall y ee Kd para mers, in Tabl erom the sanefficients, KdEuropium w afrom the d eigned the mTable 3.9-2 lues for all ameters rated NS NS NS -point nably ngular high t well n was r four g rate orkers redict on but . dance y with meters e 6-4. nd Kd ds, for as not efault mean (see other La CrossLicense TRevision NN TS6.9.The soil parameteContaminunsaturatelectroni se Boiling WTermination n 0 Table 6-5RadionucH-31 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Ni-63 Co-60 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137Eu-152Note 1: Sand K dNUREG-6697, TTable 6-6 Contaminate dContaminate dEvapotranspiWind Speed 1 Runoff coeff iSaturated zo nWell pump i nb Parameter oMass loadin gIndoor dust f iExternal ga mWell Pumpi nDepth of Soi loil Determ iDCGLs weer distributi onated Zone Fted and satu rcally with RWater Reacto rPlan 5 DetermKd palide K7 1 ds not listed in Table 3.9-1 w aSoil DCGfor Non-NParameter d zone erosion d zone b para mration coeffici eicient ne b parameter ntake depth of Unsaturated g for inhalatio niltration facto r mma shielding fng Rate l Mixing Laye rinistic Anal yere calculate ons replaced Field Capac rated zone.

TReference 8.

Tr ministic pa rarameters f oKd (cm3/g) 0.06 5 220 400 400 60 15 160 0.1 280 825 NUREG-660 7as used. L Uncertai nNuclide Spe crate meter ent zone n factor r ysis and So id using the by the dete rity was also The full RE SThe Soil D C6-18 rameter val uor soil DC GRadiEuEuNpPuPuPuPuAmAmCmCm7 Table 3.9-2 fnty Result acific Para mUncertain tResult median median median median 75th median median median median median 75th median 25th il DCGLs parameter srministic val u changed fr oSRAD SummCGLs for th eues selecte dGL calculati oionuclide u-1541 u-1551 Np-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 m-241 m-243 m-244 for this radion uand Determmeter Distri bty Selected0.0015 0.97 0.62 6.8 0.45 0.97 19.6 0.97 2.35E-050.55 0.4 986.1 0.15 set provide dues listed in om 0.2 to 0.

mary Repor te Initial Suit ed for non-se on Kd (cm825 825 5 550 550 550 550 1900190040004000uclide. The me aministic Val ubutions d Determinist i5 d in Attach mn Tables 6-4, 066 to be c ot for Soil D Ce are listed i nnsitive m3/g) 0 0 0 0 an value from ues selected ic Value ment 6-1 wi t 6-5 and 6-6onsistent wi tCGLs is pro vn Table 6-7.

th the 6. The th the vided La CrossLicense TRevisionB6.10.The BFMthe backfconceptumore detpathwaysThe BFM(639 foot20 feet bgroundwseasonal and Ventthe averaassumed The seas above 61somewhain the sa tThe BFMexposuredrilling sse Boiling WTermination n 0 Basement Fi M is used to filled base mual model w atail includin gs. The comp M conceptu at), i.e., to an bgs at 619 f owater is in dgroundwat etilation Tun nage water t ato be insta lonal water f19 foot and at of an exc eturated zone M includes t we pathways; spoils that a rWater Reacto rPlan ll Concept ucalculate d oments to rem as provided g assumed putational m oal model ass uelevation o foot elevatio ndirect com mer fluctuatio nnels, the se aable level, illed in the s afluctuations contacting beption in th a(see Figure Table 6-7wo scenarioingestion ore assumed tr ual Model ose to the in dain after lic ein section 6physical co nodel is descr umes that a lf 636 foot, an (1) which dmunication wn. Based o nasonal fluct ui.e., to the 6aturated zo nresult in fl ubackfilled s tat a portion o6-6). 7 LACBSuite RRadionuclid eH-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243 Cm-244 s; Insitu an dof drinking to be broug h6-19 dustrial wor kense termin a6.5.1. This s enfiguration, gibed in sect ill structures and then backdefines the bwith the Mi n direct obs euation can r e629 foot el ene below th eushing of w atructure sur fof building i sBWR Soil DRadionucli de Soil d Excavatio nwater from ht to the su rker AMCG fation. A ge nection descr geohydrolo gions 6.11 an dare remove dkfilled. Th ebeginning o fssissippi ri vervation of wesult in wat eevation. An e 619 foot a vater into an dfaces. Note s below 61 9DCGLs for Ides DCGL (pCi/

g5.352E+06 6.768E+06 1.019E+07 2.599E+07 1.281E+01 9.495E+06 6.577E+03 2.018E+01 2.008E+03 5.811E+01 2.844E+01 2.635E+01 1.122E+03 1.693E+03 1.523E+03 1.525E+03 3.691E+04 1.105E+03 1.872E+02 2.892E+02 2.720E+03

n. The BFM an onsite wrface during from residu aneral descri pibes the co ngy, source-t ed 6.12. d to a depth e average w af the saturat ver resultin gwater ingre ser rising up onsite wat everage wat ed out of the that the Re 9 foot and is Initial g) Insitu scen awell and d ithe installa tal radioacti vption of the nceptual mo derm and expof three fe eater table deped zone. T hg in river dss into the Pto 10 feet aer supply wer table elev aunsaturated actor Build iassumed to ario include irect expos ution of the ovity in BFM del in osure et bgs pth is he site driven Piping above well is ation. zone ing is be in s two ure to onsite La CrossLicense TRevisionwell. Thethe backf6.10.1.SThe sourBasemencharacterprovidedremain in6.10.1.1.The Reacbottom. Iextends 2upper heelevationThe totalfoot elev363 m2. removed of the st ethe 636 fstructure

reactor o

no evidenliner. T hSix 1.27

laboratorsurvey mcontaminradionuc with an aThere is is removaddition, demolitiopurposesactivity ithe liner.

6.10.1.2.The WTBstorage, ase Boiling WTermination n 0 e BFM Excafilled concr eource Ter mrce term f ont End Starization dat ad in Referen cn each base mReactctor Buildin gIt has an o v26 feet 6 in cemispherical

n. l wall/floor vation, is 51 2Remediati oexposing t heel liner wil lfoot elevati ocomprised perations bynce of cont aherefore the pcm thick co rry for analy smeasuremennation. As s hlide mixtur eaverage of 1

,no indicati oved therefor general c lon and rem o before the sin contamin a Therefore, mWasteB contained and disposa lWater Reacto rPlan avation sce nete and spre am or the BFM ate at the a for the ba sce 8. The ex pment are su mor Building g is a right cverall intern ches below gdome, whi csurface are a2 m2. The sun plans cal lhe steel line rl be remove don will rem aof a concre ty the interio ramination le apile cap an dre slices we rsis. The cor ents and rep rhown in Ta be. The Cs-13

,903 pCi/g.

on that cont ae no cores leanup of loval of the i nsteel liner i sated dust fr ominimal so ue Treatment facilities a nl of low lev er nario assum eading the co nis the tot atime of li sements tha tpected sour cmmarized be lcircular cyli nal height o fgrade level.

ch is 0.60 i na in the por turface area l for all be lr. Subseque nd. The rem aain. The re mte pile cap ar concrete, thakage beyo nd piles are c ore collected es were coll eresent the ble 6-3, Cs

-7 results fr o amination is were colle cloose conta mnternal con cs removed.

Tom the stee lurce term is eBuilding nd equipme nel solid radi o6-20 es large scal ncrete over aal inventory cense ter mt will remai nce term conf ilow. nder with a hf 144 feet a nThe steel s hnch thick.

Ttion of the bbelow the 6low grade cnt to interior aining struct umaining con cand piles. T hhe steel line rnd the steel lonsidered to bfrom the su rected from bareas expe c-137 is the pom the six c opresent in t hcted from t hmination o ncrete is exp eThis reduce sl liner to th eexpected in tnt for decont aoactive was tle industrial a 1 m layer oof residua lmination. L Tn. The dim eigurations a nhemispheri cnd an insid ehell thickne sThe lowest fbuilding to b619 foot av econcrete int econcrete re mural concret crete "bowl "he pile cap r and the ex tliner or the be non-imp arface down wbiased locat icted to co npredominat eores ranged fhe concrete the concrete n the steel ected for op es the alread ye underlyin gthe Reactor amination a nte. The siz eexcavation on the grou nl radioactiv TP Chapterensions and nd activity l ecal dome an de diameter oss is 1.16 in cfloor elevati obe backfille derage water terior to the moval, the rte outside th e" sits on an and piles w eterior concr econcrete bo wacted areas.

ward and shi pions as indi cntain the he radionucli dfrom 66 pC ito remain a foutside th eliner (con cerational ra dy low potent ig concrete d uBuilding E nnd the colle ce of the WT Bof some or nd surface.

ity remaini nr 2 provide ssurface are aevels projec td semi-ellip sof 60 feet, ach, except f oon is at 61 2d, i.e., belo wtable elevat isteel liner remaining p oe liner and bexternal s uere isolated ete bowl. Th wl exterior tpped to an ocated by ele vhighest leve de at 88%

oi/g to 7,500 pfter the stee le steel line rcrete dust) diation prot eial for trans fduring remo vnd State.

ction, proce sB floor to r eall of ng in s the as are ted to soidal and it or the 2 foot w 636 ion is to be ortion below upport from ere is to the offsite vated ls of of the pCi/g l liner r. In after ection fer of val of ssing, emain La CrossLicense TRevisionbelow 63The WTBof 626 feConcreteThe Cs-1offsite l aCs-137 cvalues thsource teDecontamdecontamTechnicaThis equ1.27 cm approximremaininremediat6.10.1.3.The WG2 feet th isystem rrecombinelevationConcreteof signifWGTV alevels in 0.547 µCconcentraof 4% ofcollectedis remov and FRS 6.10.1.4.The RemPlant/Genslab, a s mThree coconcentraThe activMDC wase Boiling WTermination n 0 36 foot elev aB basement eet. e cores were 137 concent raboratory ra nconcentratio nhat were ap perm is expec tmination wmination thr eal Support Duates to appr thick unifo rmate maxim ung after re mion is comp lWasteGTV is a 29 ick floors, wrouted mai nning, monit on. A small s ue cores were ficant conta mand WTB suthe WGTV.Ci/L and 0.

0ations in th ef the conta md from the Wed to provi dclassificati oRemamaining St rnerator Pla nmall sump i nncrete core ations in th evity was ide nas found in t hWater Reacto rPlan ation is sm afloor is at e lcollected a trations in th enged from 1 2ns in the t wroximately ted to be on will be re qeshold is th Document R Soximately 1 rm layer. A um concent rmediation t oleted.

e Gas Tank Vfoot by 31 fwalls, and ce in condenseoring and h oump is prese nnot collecte mination. H oumps can be

. The most r 0215 µCi/L e sump liqu imination lev eWGTV as a pde a better e son. aining Struct uructures cat nt area, a on n the Turbin esamples we re three core sntified in th ehe slice fro mr ll at 36.9 mlevation 63 0t biased loc ae first core s 240 pCi/g t owo core sli c1% of those the floor as quired to me open air dS-TD-313190,000 pCi/g lthough the rations, the fo the open Vault foot underg riling locate der gases t holdup for d ent that exte nd from the Wowever, 10 used to pro vecent samplfor the WT d, the cont aels in the W Tpart of cont istimate of c oures egory incl ue foot thick e Building a nre collected s ranged fro me core slice m 1.27-2.54 c6-21 2 with a tot a0 feet. A sm aations as ind ilices (0 - 1.

2o 25,400 pC ices from 1.

2found in th opposed to wmeet the udemolition c96-005, La C Cs-137 ass ubiased char afull areal ex tair demol iround concr ed 3 feet bgs jhrough vari oecay in the nds to 618 f oWGTV due tCFR Part 6vide a very res from the B and WGTamination le vTB. Additi oinuing char aontaminatio nudes the Pi premnant o f nd a small pfrom the Pi pm 10 pCi/g tfrom 0-1.2 7cm. al wall and fall sump is picated by el e27 cm) of th i/g with an a27cm - 2.5 4he 0 - 1.27 c mwalls. unrestricted criteria of 2 Crosse Openuming that cacterization tent and co nition criteri aete structur ejust outside ous componWGTV. Thoot elevatio nto access re s61 samples rough estim asumps indi cTV, respect ivels in the Wonal survey sacterization an levels to sping and Vfthe four fo oit in the Tu rping and Ve nto 20 pCi/g 7 cm. Mini mfloor surfac epresent wit hevated surv ehe three core average of 1 24 cm were mm slices. T huse crite mR/hr per n Air Demo lcontaminati osamples li kncentrations a will not e with 14 fe eof the WT Bnents for dhe vault flo on. strictions an dcollected f rate of potent icate Cs-137 ively. By si mWGTV couls and/or cor eafter all tan ksupport rem eVentilation ot thick Ch irbine Buildi nntilation Tu nwith an ave mal activity ne area of 10 2h a floor ele vey measure ms analyzed b2,003 pCi/g.

much lower he majority oria. The iEnergySolulition Limits on is prese nkely identifi eof contami nbe known et high wall B. The gas ddrying, filt eor is at 621 d low expec trom liquid i ial contami nconcentrati omple ratio od be in the re samples wks and equi pediation pla nTunnel, R eimney foun dng. nnel. The C srage of 15 pnear or belo w2 m2. vation ments. by the The with of the initial utions (14). nt in a ed the nation until s and decay ering, foot tation n the nation ons of of the range will be pment nning eactor dation s-137 pCi/g. w the La CrossLicense TRevisionCores wesump andsmall arcontinuinThe remnbecause ifour footpotential 6.10.2.BThe BFMthe "reasthereforeThe folloDirecInhalIngesIngesDirecbrougDirecsurfaThe agrimilk, graB6.11.6.11.1.BThe BFMscreeningassumed dose mo resistancThe fill vactivity mbelow thfill volu mwith watelevationThe surfase Boiling WTermination n 0 ere not coll d pit due to teas. Additi ong character inant of the it is the low t thick fou nfor contam iBFM ExposuM includes tonably fore se the industr iowing expos uct exposure tlation of air bstion of con cstion of wat ect exposure, ght to the su rct exposure, ce by excavacultural an dain and vege tBFM Insitu SBFM Insitu GM Insitu gr og approach. to release a ndeling assu me to water fl volume int omoves frome average wme in the R eter continuo uns at 618 fo oface areas beWater Reacto rPlan ected in th ethe low exp eonal concre tization in th eChimney f oest one foot ndation slab ination to m iure Pathwa ytwo exposu rseeable" fut uial worker.

ure pathwa yto external r aborne radioa ccrete or fill mer from onsi tinhalation drface durin ginhalation dation. d gardening table ingesti Scenario Groundwatoundwater (One hundre dnd instantly ming that t how, i.e., are o which the m the concr ewater table e leactor Base musly for the ot, the rem aelow 619 fo or e Reactor P lectation of s ite cores a nese areas to oundation s lportion of ais expecte digrate three fys re scenarios, ure land use ys are applic aadiation in "ctivity in "a smaterial in "te well, dose and ing eg installation dose and ing epathways aon pathway ster Scenari o(BFM Insit ud percent o fmix with t hhe source t enot present.

released ac tete surface ilevation of 6ment below 6full year. Waining End Sot in the thr e6-22 lant/Ventila tignificant c ond/or dose rsupport FR Slab has a v ea solid four fd to contai nfeet into the Insitu and at the LAC able to the B"as left" En ds left" End S"as left" En destion dose fof the onsit eestion dose fare not appl is are theref oo ugw) concepf the invent ohe fill mater ierm is in th e tivity mixe sinto the fill.

619 foot. M i619 foot becWith the e xState basem eee sumps ar tion Plant aontaminatio nrate survey sS classificat iery low pot efoot slab. T hn minimal csolid concreExcavation.BWR site i sBFM scenari d State geom State geome td State geo mfrom conta me well into t hfrom concre ticable to in dore not inclu dptual model ory in the ba cial. RESRA De fill and t hs is proporti A portion ixing is ass ucause the fi lxception of tent floors a rre insignific aarea or the Tn being pres es will be pion and plan nential of be ihe top surfa ccontaminati oete slab is v

e. As discuss s industrial aios:

etry (neglig itry (negligib metry (neglig iminated drill ihe fill mate rte that is br odustrial lan dded. is based o nckfilled bas eD is then us ehat the stru cional to the of the Rea cumed to occ ull is assume dthree small sre above 6 1ant (less tha nTurbine Bu ient and thei rperformed dning. ing contami nce of the ex ion levels an ery low.

sed in secti oand the AM Cible), le), ible), ing spoils rial, and ought to the d use. The mn a conser vement conc red to perfor mctures provi ddistance th actor Basem eur over the ed to be in c osumps with 19 foot elev an 1% of th eilding r very during nated isting d the on 6.4 CG is meat, vative rete is m the de no at the ent is entire ontact floor ation. e total La CrossLicense TRevisionbackfillepurpose oThe miximore uncfoot, conrainwateraddress tBFM codependenprovidedThe fill mvolume. highest dresulted basementcaused thfrom the Based onReactor Bassumed The RESimportantypically and runorequired

MississipunsaturatThe vertirate is d ethe 619 fchange isby forcinbelow foThe use periods oFull resounsaturatnot justi fAs listedlicense t ewas run group. se Boiling WTermination n 0 d basement of fill mixin ging distanc ecertain than ntact with wr infiltratio nthis uncertai onceptual mnce of dos ed in Referen cmixing dist aFor the Re adose. For t hin the hig hts because the RESRADwalls. This n the result sBuilding, a bfor all othe rSRAD non-dnt paramete rdetermine doff coefficie nfor LACBppi River ated zone.

ical water fl oefined by th efoot average s used to co ng the infil tr a descripti oof 3.05 m

/of increase aolution of tted zone wo ufied given t hd in Table 6-ermination. separately fWater Reacto rPlan surface are ag assumptio ne into the fi lleaching in twater is the n, as oppos enty in a ma nmodel, a s ie on the m ice 8. nces evalua tactor Buildi nhe remainin ghest dose.

Tthe source t D Length Pa rreduced the s of the sen bove and b er basements/dispersion g rr is the vert id by the inf int paramete rWR due toand the res uow rate is c oe distance t hwater table nservativel ytration rate ton of the m e/yr is cons eand decreas ethe actual wuld require de bounding/1, there are Due to dif fefor the Rea cr a) and are i nns. ll after leac hto the Reac tresult of p eed to conti nnner consist imple sensi tixing distan ted ranged frng above 6 1g basement sThe Reactor erm is enti rrallel to Flomodeled w esitivity ana lelow 619 fo o/structures.

roundwater ical flow r ailtration rat ers. A differ eo the site gulting seas oonservativel hat water re celevation (1 y bound the to be 3.05 method used t oervative be ce, as well as water flow detailed gro uscreening a pportions of ferences in cctor Buildi n6-23 ncluded wi thing from fl otor Building eriodic flus hnual contact ent with th etivity anal yce. The mfrom 2.54 c m19 foot an a ss the nomi nBuilding arely on the ww paramete rell water co nlysis, full mot, and a 2.

5model is u sate of water e as defined ent approac hgroundwate ronal water y modeled icedes from t h0 ft or 3.05 mnet flow of m/y. See E qo assign a 3.ause the s ea horizont apattern du rundwater tr approach use deight struct uconfiguratio nng, WTB, Wth the base moor and wa lfill volum ehing from swith wate re screening aysis was c omixing volu mm to full mi xssumption onal minimu mabove 619 fwalls of a rr to be corr encentrations.

mixing with t54 cm mixi nsed in the Bthrough th eby the pre ch to defini nr being hy dlevel fluct uin RESRADhe seasonal m). This se awater to th equation 1 a n05 m/yr inf ieasonal wat eal compone nring the se aansport and dd to develop ures that wi ln and conta mWGTV, and ments above ll surfaces ae below 619 seasonal w ar in the sat uapproach us eonducted t ome sensitiv ixing throug hof full mixi nm mixing dfoot differe dright circul aelated to th

e. the fill was ng distance BFM Insitu gwe unsaturat ecipitation, e vng the verti cdraulically cuation into D by assumi nhigh elevat iasonal 3.05 me saturated znd corresp oiltration rate er level flu cnt, that are nasonal fluc tdispersion m the BFM c oll be backfil lmination p othe "Rema i619 foot f oabove 619 f ofoot. Abov eater level ri surated zone

.ed to devel oo determin eity calculati hout the enti rng resulted idepth of 2.5 4d from the ar cylinder we mixing di sassumed f ointo the fil lw assessme ned zone wh ivapotranspi rcal flow rat econnected t oand out o ng that the a nion of 629 f om water ele vzone in RES onding disc uin RESRADctuation in cnot accounte dtuations int omodeling wh onceptual m oled and rem aotential, the ining Struc tor the oot is e 619 se, or . To op the e the on is re fill in the 4 cm other which stance or the l was nt. An ich is ration e was o the f the nnual oot to vation RAD ussion D. cludes d for. o the ich is odel. ain at BFM tures" La CrossLicense TRevision6.11.1.1.RESRADfor each concentrathat a unof licensdependencan be deper mCi tthe DSR BFM Ins6.11.1.2.An uncecalculati oparametesoil DCGThe paraBFM InsThe affeThicknesand FractThe uncabove 6 Remaininfive BFM"Variablestructure The selecthe BFMInsitugw Mississipindicate f619 footexample,to be obs10 feet (

3The seasInsitugw approachand unsarise abovunsaturatse Boiling WTermination n 0 BFM D was used tradionuclid eations to de tnit source te rse terminati ont on the mi escribed as ptotal activit yby the pCi

/situgw DFs asBFM ertainty ana lon of DSRers for the B FGL uncertai nameter set d esitugw analysected RESR Ass of Conta mtion of Con tertainty ana19 foot ele vng Structure M Insitugw ue" in Attac hs. ction of the PM Insitugw REconceptual mppi river an dfluctuations

t. However,

, it is know nserved in th e3.05 m) abo vsonal water dose asses sh. The seaso naturated zon eve the 619 f oted zone.

Water Reacto rPlan Insitugw Comto develop De in the initi termine BF Mrm of 1 pCi on which wxing distan cpCi/g in fill py in concret e/g per mCi vs detailed in Insitugw RESlysis was p es for the BFM Insitugw nty analysis (eveloped to sis with cha nAD geometrminated Zon eaminated Z oalysis was pvation, Re as resulting i nuncertainty ahment 6-2 wPrecipitatio nESRAD modmodel assu md fluctuates that are up the river sn that water e Piping an dve the avera gtable rise msment but nal water ri se is the aver aoot results i nr mputation MDose to Sou ral suite. Th eM Insitugw Dtotal invent owas instantl yce as discus sper total pC ie, were then value. Exce lReference 8SRAD Unceerformed to BFM Insitu gRESRAD u(see process perform the nges to acc ory paramet ee, Length P aone below thperformed factor Buildi nn five separ aanalyses are were assign en, Evapotra ndel requires ames that th eseasonally ito five feet stage does nlevel seaso nd Ventilatio nge water tab must be ac cdoes not pse was addr eage water ta bn water peri o6-24 Model rce Ratios (

De DSRs wer eFs. The fill ory was pre sy released a nsed above.

Ti in concret ecalculated bl spreadshe e8. ertainty Ana l select det egw model. Tuncertainty aflowchart i n soil DCG Lount for the ers are Cov earallel to Aq uhe Water Ta bfor five str ung below 6ate uncertai nlisted in A ed the value snspiration R aadditional e xe onsite gro unto the uns ahigher than not precisel ynally rises t on Tunnels w ile elevation

.counted for precisely fit essed by ass uble elevatio nodically ent eDSRs), wit he used in coconcentrati osent in the bnd mixed wThe fill con ce. BFM Insi tby convertin get calculatio nlysis for Ini terministic RThe proces sanalysis was n Figure 6-7

)L uncertaint y geometries er Depth, Auifer Flow, Uble. ucture confi 619 foot el enty analyses Attachment 6s shown in ate, and Ru nxplanation.

Aundwater is aturated zon the averag ey represent o an elevati oith a floor a

t. in the con cthe RESRuming that tn of 619 fo oering backf ih units of m rnjunction wons were cal basement co nwith a volu mcentration t htugw DFs, in g pCi to mC ns were use dtial Suite RESRAD pas for deter mthe same a s). y analysis is of the backArea of Co nUnsaturate digurations; Revation, W T. The para m6-2. The pa rTable 6-8 fnoff Coeffici As discusse ds in commu nne. River sta ge site water tsite water on sufficien tat 629 foot e ceptual mo dRAD groundthe boundar yot. The seas oilled structu rrem/yr per pwith calculat eculated ass uncrete at th eme of fill t hhen has unitunits of mr ei and multi pd to calcula tarameters f omining the s that used f oapplicable tkfilled struc tntaminated Zd Zone Thic kReactor Bu iTB, WTGV,meters used f orameters list for the resp eent paramet ed above, the nication wi tge measure mtable elevati table levels tly high for wlevation wh idel for the dwater mody of the sat uonal 3.05 m wres that are ipCi/g, ed fill uming e time hat is s that em/yr plying te the or the input or the to the tures. Zone, kness, ilding , and or the ed as ective ers in BFM th the ments on of s. For water ich is BFM deling urated water in the La CrossLicense TRevisionTable 6-Area(m2)ThiczoneLengFlowUnsaThicFraczoneThe effecby conserise repr eprecipita tprecipita tMaximizradionucTo forcerepresentsetting t h1 in Refparamete WThe distrvalue of value of Consistenthe initi aradionucanalysis.

se Boiling WTermination n 0 8 DeterAnalyParameteCover Depth a of Contamin ackness of Cont ae (m) gth Parallel to Aw (m) aturated Zone ckness (m) tion of conta me below the wa tct of the 3.

0ervatively a sesents a con tion driven ition, evapo zing the in filides when te RESRAD t the infilt rathe Evapotra nference 12, ier. Where: I = InE = EvR = RP = Prribution eva l0.25 m/yr (3.05 m/yr s ent with NU Ral suite radio nlides that wThis limit aWater Reacto rPlan rministic G eysis for the fr RA(m) ated Zone aminated Aquifer minated ter table 05 m season assuming tha tstant infiltr ainfiltration rtranspiratio nfiltration r atethe non-disp eto use a 3.

0tion rate di rnspiration R ait is seen th a nfiltration R avapotranspi rRunoff Coef frecipitation Rluated in the(the actual pelected to re pREG-1757 gnuclides are were greate ration was n r eometry REfive BFM I nRx Buildin g Above 619' 0.91 262.68 5.18 18.29 1E-10 0 al flushing ht the distan cation rate of rate at the L An and runo e maximize ersion grou n05 m/yr inf irectly by as sate and Run oat this will rate (m/yr) ration Coef fificient (dim eRate (m/yr) e sensitivity precipitation present the sguidance, th epresent at t hr than 0.1

%ecessary to 6-25 ESRAD Paransitugw ConRx Buildi nBelow 6196.10 182.41 0.75 15.24 0 1 height is ac cce that the w3.05 m/yr.

TACBWR sitff coefficie ns the well ndwater mo diltration rat esigning 3.05 off Coeffici eresult in an i ficient (dime ensionless) analysis wa sdriven infi lseasonal wat e uncertaint yheir mixture

% of the mi xresult in p rameters us efigurationsng 9' WTB2.72101.900.02546.103.350 counted for iwater recede sThis is cons ete which is 0nt in the Swater conc edel is select ee, the preci p m/yr to th eent paramet einfiltration r nsionless) s a uniform ltration rate ter table flu cy analysis we fractions a sxture were ractical RE Sed in the U n B WGTV 5.46 0 460.04 4 0.0254 9.75 0.61 0 in the BFM s after the s ervative rel a0.25 m/yr (a sSoil DCGLentrations f oed in RESR Apitation par ae precipitati oers to zero.

Frate equal to distribution at the site) ctuation.

was perfor ms listed in T aincluded i nSRAD run ncertainty RemainingStructure s2.4 667.26 0.0254 38.10 3.67 0 Insitugw sceseasonal (3.

0ative to the as calculated parameter or all signi fAD. ameter is us on paramete From Equat i the precipi tEquationwith a min iand a max imed assumin gable 6-3. On ln the uncer ttimes. Ho wg s enario 05 m) actual from set). ficant ed to er and ion 6-tation n 6-1 imum imum g that ly the tainty wever, La CrossLicense TRevisionincludingthat all s eThe RES14 proviparamete10 to 6-1 The paragenerate not cont distribut iThe majcorrelati ocorrelate thresholdnegative

scenario

of radioafor the nconservaassigned

Figure 6 shown toThe Kd vnot inclulisted in Rand provattributa b6.11.1.3.As discuthe ReacStructuredetermin9 to 6-14changed The RESDSRs are6.11.1.4.

The BFMInsitugw Dand BeloTable6-1se Boiling WTermination n 0 g all radion uensitive par aSRAD Unceride summarers. Table 6-94 provide t hameter distri bthe median

,ain values ion was use djority of t hon between d). The p d and each correlation is through t hactivity in th enon-sensitiv eatively assig nas indicate d-7 but this o be only sli gvalues selec tuded in the uReference 1 vides consist eble to the re mBFM ssed above, ctor Buildi nes. The para mnistic values 4 replacing t hfrom 0.2 to SRAD Uncere provided i nBFM M Insitugw DDFs are list eow 619 foo t6.Water Reacto rPlan uclides with ameters will rtainty Repo ries of the 9 provides t hhe radionucl ibutions for t h, 25th and 75for Europi ud. he uncertai nKd and doarameters woccurred in with Kd w ahe ingestion e water pha se radionucl ined the 25 th d by the PR Cwill have a ghtly sensiti vted for the vuncertainty

4. Using th eency in det emoved radi oInsitugw RESthe BFM In ng (above meters prov iin Tables 6-he paramete r0.066 to be crtainty Rep on Table 6-1 5Insitugw DosFs were cal ced in Table 6t were sum mr greater tha nbe identifie drts are prov iuncertaint yhe results fo ide specific Khe site-spec i5th percentil um; the 25 thnty analysis ose (i.e., 3 0with positiv only one oas expected sof well wat se at equilib rides that w epercentile vCC results ivery mino rve. very low a buanalysis w ee 25th percenermining the nuclides.

SRAD Detersitugw RESRand below ided in Atta c8 replacing tr distributio nconsistent worts are pro v5. se Factors culated by E6-16. Note t hmed in Ref e6-26 n 0.1% of t hd. ided electro ny analysis rr the non-ra dKd results f oific soil typ ee determini sh percentileresults th a0 of the 3 4e correlati oof the three since the pr ier and lowe rrium. There fere include dvalues from Rin order to for, if any, e fundance (<0 ere also assi gntiles for all insignifica nrministic A nRAD dose a s619' elev achment 6-2 wthe "variabl ens. The Co nwith the unsa vided electr oExcel spread shat the DFs erence 8 to he mixture nically with results wit hdionuclide sor each of t he of sand fro mstic values.

Nfrom the Nat were se n4 sensitive ons were o nuncertainty imary dose pr Kd values fore, the det ed in the un cReference 1 follow the p affect on dos e.1%) initial gned the 2 5initial suite nt dose cont rnalysis and Dssessments wation), WT Bwere applie de" paramete rntaminated Zaturated and onically wit hsheet in Re ffor the Rea cdetermine tfraction pr oReference 8 h the selec tspecific para he basement sm Referenc eNote that RNUREG-669nsitive indi cparameters nly slightly runs. The ppathway in tresult in a gerministic Kcertainty a n4. The 75t harameter se le since the suite radio n5th percentil eradionuclid eributors and DSR Result swere perfor mB, WGTV d to all five rs and the v aZone Field Csaturated z oh Reference ference 8. T hctor Buildin gthe Reactor ovides confi

d. Tables 6-9 ted determi nmeters. Tab ls evaluate d.e 14 were u sReference 14 97 Kd para mcated a ne gwere nega tabove the predominanthe BFM In sgreater perce nKd values se lnalysis wer eh percentiles lection proc eparameters nuclides that e values for es is conser vthe dose fr as med separate land Remaanalyses wi talues in Tab lCapacity wa sone. 8. The res uhe resulting g Above 61 9Building D dence 9 to 6-nistic les 6-sed to does meter gative tively 0.25 nce of situgw ntage lected e also were ess in were were sand vative action ly for aining th the les 6-s also ulting BFM 9 foot Fs in La CroLicensRevisi . osse Boiling W ase Termination Pion 0 Table 6- Note 1: Positive conceptual mod eNote 2: Negativ eNote 3: Site-spe cwc.usace.army.

mNote 4: The pre cother basements.

Para Cover Erosion RContaminated zContaminated zWind Speed (

NPrecipitation Saturated zone bWell pump int aWell Pumping RUnsaturated zo nMass loading f oIndoor dust filt rExternal gamm aDepth of Soil Mater Reacto r Plan -9 Results ocorrelation with d oel. e correlation with dcific wind speed d amil/projects/Lock4.

cipitation paramete r ameter Rate zone erosion rate zone b paramete r Note 3) b parameter ake depth Rate ne b paramete r or inhalation ration facto r a shielding facto r Mixing Laye r of RESRAD U nose. Maximum site

-dose. Minimum sit eata used (US Army shtml) r was not sensitive ReactorBuildingAbove 619Percentile V a75th 0.0median 0.

0median 0.

925th 3.3Note 4 3.

0median 0.

9Note 2 6.

0median986median0.9median2.3median0.5median0.2median0.2ncertainty Ana-specific value bas e-specific value us eCorps of Enginee rfor the Reactor B u9 ReaBuilBelowalue Percentil e0029 75th 0015 75th 97 median 3 median 05 Note 4 97 median 08 Note 2 6.1 median 97 median 35E-5 median 55 25th 27 median 23 median 6-27 alysis for BFM Ied on seasonal wa ted for conservatis mrs, Mississippi Riv euilding Above and Bactor lding w 619 e Value Perc0.0029 75 th0.0029 med i0.97 medi6.8 75th3.05 Note 0.97 medi6.08 Note 986.1 med i0.97 medi2.35E-5 medi0.35 medi0.27 medi0.23 mediInsitugw and Ster rise value (3.05 m er Lock and Damn Below 619 foot. T hWTB entile Value 0.0029 ian 0.0015 ian 0.97 10.2 1 3.05 ian 0.97 2 6.08 ian 986.1 ian 0.97 ian 2.35E-5 ian 0.55 ian 0.27 ian 0.23 Selected Deter mm) used for conse r4, Alma WI, Web he 3.05 m/yr rate wWGTV Percentile Va lmedian 0.0 0median 0.0 0median 0.9 7median 6.8Note 1 3.0 525th 0.84Note 2 6.0 8median 98 6median 0.9 7median 2.3 5median 0.5 5median 0.2 7median 0.2 3ministic Param ervatism and linkagaddress http://wwwas applied for co nRemaStruclue Percentile 015 75th 015 median 7 median 75th 5 Note 1 4 median 8 Note 2 6.1 75th 7 median 5E-5 median 5 median 7 median 3 median eters e to ww.mvp-nsistency with the aining ctures Value 0.0029 0.0015 0.97 10.2 3.05 0.97 6.08 1311.2 0.97 2.35E-5 0.55 0.27 0.23 La Crosse BLicense Te rRevision 0 TabRadH-3C-1Fe-Ni-Co-Ni-Sr-9Cs-Eu-Eu-Pu- TabRadH-3C-1Fe-5Ni-5Co-Ni-6Sr-9Cs-Eu-Eu-Pu-2 Boiling Wat ermination Pl ale 6-10 Bfodionuclide K3 14 59 63 90 -137 -152 -154 -241 le 6-11 Bfodionuclide K3 4 55 59 60 63 90 137 152 154 241 er Reactor an BFM Insitu gor Distribu tKd in Conta m25th NS NS NS NS NS 25th 25th NS 75th NS BFM Insitu gor Distribu tKd in Contam iNS NS NS NS NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS gw Rx Build ition Coeffic minated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 7302 173 gw Rx Build ition Coeffic inated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 6-28 ing above 61ients (Kd)

Kd in Uns aNS 25th NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS ing below 61ients (Kd) Kd in Unsat uNA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 19: Uncert aaturated Zone0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 19 Uncerta iurated Zone NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ainty Analyse Kd in Sat uNS NS NS NS NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS inty AnalysiKd in Sat uNS NS NS NS NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS sis Results urated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 is Results urated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 La Crosse BLicense Te rRevision 0 TRadH-3 C-14Fe-5Ni-5Co-6Ni-6Sr-9Cs-1Eu-1Eu-1Pu-2 TRadH-3C-1Fe-Ni-Co-Ni-Sr-9Cs-Eu-Eu-Pu- Boiling Wat ermination Pl aTable 6-12 dionuclide K4 55 59 60 63 0 137 152 154 241 Table 6-13 dionuclide K3 14 55 59 -60 63 90 137 -152 -154 241 er Reactor an BFM DistriKd in Contam iNS NS NS NS NS NS 25th NS NS NS NS BFM DistriKd in Conta mNS NS NS NS NS 25th 25th NS NS 25th NS Insitugw Wibution Co einated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 Insitugw Wibution Co eminated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 6-29 TB Uncert aefficients (

KKd in Unsa tNS NS NS NS NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS GTV Uncerefficients (

KKd in Unsa t75th NS 75th 75th NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS ainty AnalyKd) turated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 rtainty AnaKd) turated Zone 0.09 1.8 1279 1110 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 ysis Results fKd in Satu rNS NS NS 25th NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS alysis Resul tKd in Sat uNS NS NS NS 25th 75th 25th 25th NS NS NS for rated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 ts for urated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 1110 5 50 95 95 173 La Crosse BLicense Te rRevision 0 TabRadiH-3 C-14Fe-55Ni-59Co-6Ni-63Sr-90Cs-13Eu-1Eu-1Pu-24Note 1: Incon s Boiling Wat ermination Pl able 6-14 Bfoionuclide 4 5 9 0 3 0 37 52 54 41 sistent uncerta ier Reactor an BFM Insitu gor Distribu tKd in Conta mNS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS NS inty results wi t gw Remainintion Coeffic minated Zone0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 th PRCC valu e6-30 ng Structur eients (Kd)

Kd in Uns aNS NS 75th , 25th(Note 1) NS NS NS 25th 25th NS NS NS es only slightl yes Uncertai naturated Zon e0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 y above 0.25 c rnty Analysie Kd in Sat uNS NS NS NS 25th NS 25th 25th NS NS 25th riteria. 25th pers Results urated Zone 0.05 1.8 38 147 9 147 5 50 95 95 173 rcentile value wwas used.

La CroLicensRevisi osse Boiling W ase Termination Pion 0 ater Reacto r Plan Table 6-15 BRadionuclide H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243 Cm-244 BFM Insitu gw DRx Building Above 619' (mrem/yr per pCi/g) 3.51E-03 1.94E-02 6.14E-05 2.65E-05 4.15E-02 6.01E-05 5.26E-01 8.77E-02 8.22E-02 1.48E-02 5.12E-04 7.30E-06 4.35E-05 2.65E-01 3.79E-01 3.78E-01 6.33E-03 1.86E-01 2.22E-01 5.35E-03 3.02E-03 DSRs for Reac t Rx Buildi nBelow 619(mrem/yr ppCi/g) 7.13E-042.26E-025.65E-045.75E-051.10E-011.58E-041.13E+006.42E-031.64E-023.97E-022.67E-033.88E-036.03E-047.42E-018.24E-018.24E-011.59E-024.46E-014.44E-011.14E-019.08E-026-31 tor Buildin g, Wng 9' er WTBExcavatio nFacto(mrem/yrpCi/g7.16E-1.99E-7.61E-2.11E-2.95E-9.26E-1.30E-2.32E-1.10E-1.84E-1.61E-1.62E-4.51E-2.33E-3.00E-2.93E-1.32E-6.34E-1.55E-9.04E-2.91E-WTB, WGTV, aB n Dose or r per g) WGExcavaFa(mrempC06 1.2304 2.9313 0.0006 2.1504 2.4107 5.2602 2.2004 2.4004 2.4904 9.5808 1.6810 9.1916 1.7203 1.6402 3.0802 3.0604 3.5803 1.3502 1.6406 1.3705 4.36and Remainin gGTV ation Dose actor m/yr per Ci/g) RSExca(m3E-05 43E-04 10E+00 15E-06 21E-03 46E-07 70E-02 30E-04 29E-04 78E-04 18E-05 79E-06 42E-07 44E-02 18E-02 36E-02 38E-04 25E-02 54E-02 17E-05 76E-05 3g Structures Remaining Structure avation Dose Factor rem/yr per pCi/g) 4.62E-05 1.26E-03 1.53E-13 2.18E-06 4.05E-04 7.82E-07 3.47E-02 2.43E-04 7.82E-04 1.53E-04 7.17E-09 4.50E-11 4.49E-17 1.85E-03 3.09E-02 3.00E-02 2.02E-04 5.83E-03 1.57E-02 7.79E-05 3.13E-05 La Crosse BLicense Te rRevision 0 RaH-3C-1Fe-Ni-Co-Ni-Sr-9Nb-Tc-Cs-Eu-Eu-Eu-Pu-Pu-Pu-Pu-AmAmCmCmBoiling Wat ermination Pl a adionuclide 3 14 59 63 90 99 -137 -152 -154 -155 -238 -239 -240 -241 m-241 m-243 m-243 m-244 er Reactor an TableRx BuildiBFM Insitu g(mrem/yr pmCi) 4.44E-031.02E-012.37E-032.50E-044.74E-016.80E-044.91E+006.36E-021.03E-011.71E-011.13E-021.61E-022.52E-033.20E+003.59E+003.58E+006.88E-021.93E+001.94E+004.74E-013.79E-01 e 6-16 BFng gw DF per BFMDo(mr3 11 43 14 41 64 20 22 51 21 42 32 33 90 50 60 62 20 10 31 11 6 6-32 FM InsitugwWTB M Insitugw DF ose Factor rem/yr per mCi) 1.57E-03 4.36E-02 1.67E-10 4.63E-04 6.48E-02 2.03E-04 .85E+00 5.10E-02 2.42E-02 4.05E-02 3.54E-06 3.55E-08 9.91E-14 5.10E-01 .59E+00 .44E+00 2.90E-02 .39E+00 .40E+00 1.98E-03 6.40E-03 Dose Fact o WGTVBFM Insit u(mrem/yr mCi)6.00E-01.43E-00.00E+01.04E-01.17E-02.56E-01.07E+01.17E-01.21E-04.66E-08.18E-04.47E-08.37E-07.97E-01.50E+01.49E+01.74E-06.57E-07.98E-06.67E-02.12E-0 ors V ugw DF per RStBFM(mr04 102 400 504 701 105 200 102 802 202 504 204 106 101 600 100 102 601 101 504 203 1emaining tructures M Insitugw DF rem/yr per mCi) 1.55E-03 4.21E-02 5.12E-12 7.29E-05 1.36E-02 2.62E-05 1.16E+00 8.14E-03 2.62E-02 5.14E-03 2.40E-07 1.51E-09 1.51E-15 6.21E-02 1.04E+00 1.00E+00 6.78E-03 1.95E-01 5.27E-01 2.61E-03 1.05E-03 La CrossLicense TRevision6.11.2.BThe BFMpathwaysbe brougconcrete.residual which inscenario assumingmrem/yr There areof slurry would likconstructbeing broThe wellis met ancapture 1borehole borehole depth of

are unifoThe doseDCGLs aDCGLs SummaryThe AFsRESRADB6.12.The BFMand the cdecay. Tconceptumixing dBFM ExcDue to dcalculatesame maThe BFMlisted in Tse Boiling WTermination n 0 BFM Insitu DM Insitu Dr is listed in s eght to the su

r. The drille rradioactivit yncludes the fis the resi dg no decay per total m Ce a number opits, tanks, kely involve tion. As a cought to the l is assumed nd drilling s100 percent area. The diameter a n3 feet in or dormly mixed e from the c iand AFs.

Tand the sp oy Reports ar s and BFM D results. T hBFM ExcavaM Excavatio nconcrete spr eThe calcula tual model th during exca vcavation D Fdifferences i nd separatel ynner as was M Excavati oTable 6-18.

Water Reacto rPlan Drilling Spoilling Spoil section 1. T hrface during r is assum ey in the co nfill material dual radioac tor release tCi. of ways that and dumpin g additional dconservativ esurface.

to be drille dstopped. T hof the rem avolume of snd depth of dder to mini mand spread oircular area aThe AFs we roils spread e provided eInsituds DFhe BFM Insi tation Scena rn scenario a sead on the s ution of allo wat the aver avation will Fs in units o fn configurat iy for the Re adone for th eon DFs are cr oils Scenari s (BFM Ins ihe dose fro mthe installa ted to be un ancrete surfa cabove the s ttivity remai nto the fill.

Tinstallers h ag the drillin gdilution by re assumptio nd into the b ahe extent of aining resi dspoil materi drilling whi cmize the mi xover a circu lat the surfa cre calculate darea whic helectronicall yFs were cal ctuds DFs are rio ssumes that urface imm ewable total age radionu cnot exceed f mrem/yr p eion and con tactor Buildi ne BFM Insit ucalculated b y6-33 o and DF Cituds) scenarm residual r ation of a we laware that tces is broug htructure flo oning in co nThe BFM Inandle and di sg spoils on trefilling the pn, no diluti oasement fill ddrilling int odual radioac tal brought tch is conser vxing volume lar area on t hce was calc ud using the dh was deter my with Refe rculated by Elisted in Ta bsome or all oediately afte rmCi is drclide concen tthe surface er total mCi.

tamination png, WTB, Wu assessmen ty Excel spr eCalculation rio addresse adioactivity ill that randothe backfill ht to the su ror. The sour cncrete at the nsituds DFs spose of dri lthe existing spit with the on of the sp odown to the o concrete i stivity in the to the surfa cvatively ass ufor all base mhe ground s uulated by R Edeterministi cmined to b rence 8.

Excel sprea dble 6-17. of the back fr license te rriven by th etrations in t hsoil DCGL potential, th eWGTV, and ts. eadsheet in s one of th ein the concr eomly hits ba ced structur erface with t hce term for time of li care calcula tlling spoils, surface soil smaterial ex coil material e concrete fl os assumed t o concrete s uce is calcul aumed to be ments. The urface to a dESRAD usin c paramete rsbe 0.457 m2dsheet in R efilled struct urmination ta ke baseline lhe concrete Ls. The ass ee BFM ExcaRemaining Reference 8e BFM expete is assu mckfilled stru ce is present

.he drilling sthe BFM I ncense termi nted with un iincluding t hs. The use ocavated duri nis assumed oor where r eo be suffici eurface with iated based othe minimu m concrete a ndepth of 0.1 5g the surfac s applied fo

2. The RES eference 8 uures are exca vking no cre dlimitation i nafter inadv eessment pro avation DFs Structures i8. The resul tosure med to ctural . The spoils nsituds nation its of he use of pits ng its after efusal ent to in the on the m fill nd fill 5 m. e soil or soil RAD using vated dit for n the ertent ovides were in the ts are La CrossLicense TRevision R se Boiling WTermination n 0 TRadionuclide H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243 Cm-244 Water Reacto rPlan Table 6-17 BFM InsiReactoBuildin(mrem/yrmCi) 7.15E-01.26E-02.43E-01.38E-01.16E-03.50E-02.05E-07.94E-03.10E-02.83E-05.46E-05.81E-02.01E-01.08E-01.19E-01.18E-01.65E-06.94E-09.57E-05.88E-06.77E-0 r BFM Insiituds or ng r per BF(mr09 708 109 209 101 109 304 202 707 302 202 502 503 104 104 104 105 104 603 903 505 66-34 itu Drillin g FM Insituds WTB rem/yr per mCi) 7.03E-08 1.24E-07 2.39E-08 1.36E-08 1.14E+00 3.45E-08 2.02E-03 7.81E-01 3.05E-06 2.78E-01 5.38E-01 5.72E-01 1.97E-02 1.06E-03 1.17E-03 1.16E-03 1.62E-04 6.83E-03 9.41E-02 5.78E-02 6.66E-04 Spoils Dos eBFM InsWGTV(mrem/yrmCi)3.64E-06.42E-01.24E-07.01E-05.91E-01.78E-01.04E-04.04E-01.58E-01.44E-02.78E-02.96E-01.02E-05.47E-06.04E-06.00E-08.39E-03.53E-04.87E-02.99E-03.44E-0e Factors situds V r per ) BInRemStr(mpe08 8.008 1.408 2.709 1.501 1.308 3.903 2.301 8.906 3.401 3.101 6.101 6.502 2.204 1.204 1.304 1.305 1.803 7.702 1.002 6.604 7.6BFM nsituds maining ructures mrem/yr r mCi) 02E-09 41E-08 73E-09 55E-09 30E-01 93E-09 30E-04 91E-02 48E-07 17E-02 13E-02 52E-02 25E-03 21E-04 33E-04 32E-04 85E-05 79E-04 07E-02 60E-03 60E-05 La CrossLicense TRevision RadEEEAACCIn6.13.NUREG-criterion applies tinsignifi cidentifie sThe radiothe ROC DCGLs.

the soil Dfrom furmrem/yr se Boiling WTermination n 0 dionuclide H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243 Cm-244 nsignificant-1757, secti o(i.e., 2.5 m rto the sum ocant. This s es the radion uonuclides r

e. The ROC The dose fDCGLs andrther detaile dose criteri aWater Reacto rPlan Table 6Rx BuildinExcavation DFactor (mre mper mCi) 3.69E-06 2.92E-06 1.94E-06 7.60E-07 1.54E+00 2.08E-06 3.00E-03 9.79E-01 9.84E-03 3.40E-01 6.94E-01 7.50E-01 1.76E-02 1.17E-02 1.30E-02 1.30E-02 5.35E-04 1.79E-02 1.06E-01 6.83E-02 7.26E-03 t Dose Cont on 3.3 state srem/yr) are cof the dose ection provi duclides that cemaining af tlist is deter mfrom the re md BFM DFs d evaluatio na. r 6-18 BFMg Dose m/yr WExcaDose(mremm4.83.82.51.02.02.73.91.21.34.59.19.92.31.51.71.77.02.31.49.09.6ributors an s that radion uconsidered t ocontributio des the asses can be desig nter the remomined for c omoved insig nfor the RO ns during F6-35 M Excavati oWTB avation e Factor m/yr per mCi) F88E-05 86E-05 56E-05 01E-05 4E+01 75E-05 97E-02 9E+01 30E-01 0E+00 9E+00 2E+00 33E-01 54E-01 72E-01 71E-01 08E-03 36E-01 0E+00 03E-01 61E-02 d Radionu cuclides con to be "insig nns from th esment of do snated as ins ioval of insig oncrete usin gnificant con tC. The in sFRS and de mon Dose Fac WGTV Excavation DFactor (mre mper mCi)1.63E-051.29E-058.56E-063.36E-066.81E+009.19E-061.33E-024.32E+004.35E-021.50E+003.07E+003.31E+007.78E-025.15E-025.73E-025.72E-022.36E-037.90E-024.66E-013.02E-013.21E-02clides of Co ntributing no nificant cont re aggregate se contribut iignificant d ognificant co ng the BFM Dtributors w asignificant c monstration tors Dose m/yr RemStruExcaDose (mremm8.186.474.301.693.424.66.662.172.187.541.541.663.902.592.882.871.193.962.341.51.6ncern greater tha nributors".

Tof radionu cions from t hose contribu tntributors w eDFs and for sas accounte dontributors of compli amaining ucture avation Factor m/yr per mCi) 8E-06 7E-06 0E-06 9E-06 2E+00 1E-06 6E-03 7E+00 8E-02 4E-01 4E+00 6E+00 0E-02 9E-02 8E-02 7E-02 9E-03 6E-02 4E-01 1E-01 1E-02 n 10% of th eThe 10% cri tclides consi dhe initial sui ttors. ere designa tsoil using th d for by adj uwill be exclance with t he dose terion dered te and ted as he soil usting luded he 25 La CrossLicense TRevisionNote thalow. Ass25 mremwas usedor 0.053 qualitati vrepresent6.13.1.RThe soilcontributfinal ROCcontributThe dosethe threeinsignifi cpercentagcontains

the initi acontributboth are

in Table The Tabsurface athat ther eto date, remaininconcentraradionuc to the McontamincontaminreasonabFrom Attcontributand basedesignateThe data

3 is the mcalculatepositivel ythe MDCto HTDpredominse Boiling WTermination n 0 t Sr-90 was uming the r am/yr criterio nd to calculat e% percent ve reason t hted a signifi cRadionuclid e DCGLs antions from t hCs and adju stor radionuc le percentag ee BFM scen acant contrib uges attribut aa copies of al suite an dtors that we rprovided in 6-3 and the le 6-3 mixt uand subsurfa ce is minima lLACBWR ng subsurfa cations of rlide mixtur eMDC biasin gnated water nation, the Rly represent atachment 6-3te greater th ement conc red as insign ifrom high amost repres ed when the Hy detected, tC values wh iD radionucl inately Cs-1 3Water Reacto rPlan included i nadionuclide

n. When the ae dose perc eof the 25 mhat it was pcant dose fr aes of Conce nd BFM Dhe initial sui tst the ROCs lides. es for the in iarios; BFM utors remo vable to the i nTables 20 ad the dose re removed.Attachment second appl ure was ba sce soil char al residual radoes not a nce soil tha tadionuclide se fractions f og issues di sthat caused ROC and ra dative of soil s3, it is seen tan 97.28%

orete are C sificant contr iactivity core sentative dat aHTD radion then the mix tich is conse rides using 37, decrease sr n the ROC lmixture in Tactual soil c hentages, the mrem/yr cri tpositively i daction.

rn and Ad juFs were u ste radionucl ifor the dos eitial suite raInsitugw, BFved was the nsignificant cnd 22 from percentages Two meth o6-3. The fi ried the actu ased on con cacterization idioactivity inticipate th et has not s identified or initial sui tscussed ab oconcrete c odionuclide ms for FRS pl that for all sof the total ds-137, Co-6 ibutors and as that were ua available.

Tuclides are pture percent rvative. Ho wMDC valus. 6-36 ist for soil aTable 6-3, t hharacterizat iSr-90 dose wterion. Sr-90dentified in usted Soil Dsed in Ref eides, identif ye percentag edionuclides FM Insituds,same for socontributors Reference 5attributabl eods were us rst method a pal concentra tcrete cores bin the impa cin soil. Bas e presence oyet been cin LACBWte radionucl iove. Based ontaminatio nmixture deriv anning and isoil and con cdose. Ther e0 and Sr-9are eliminat eused to calc uThe most ac cpositively d eages assign ewever, the a cues will d ealthough th ehe Sr-90 dosion data for was determ i0 was incl usome conc DCGLs and erence 5 to y the insign ie attributabl ewere calcu l, and BFM Eoil and the B were differ 5 which pro ve to the a gsed for the capplied the r ations of cha rbut was als octed area su red on the c hof significa ncharacterize dWR soil, tides in soil i d on a gen en would be ved for the c oimplementa tcrete scenar iefore, the fi n0. The red from furt hulate the rad icurate radio netected. If t hed to the H Tccuracy of t hecrease as e dose cont rse fraction wthe initial s uined to be 2 uded as a srete sampl eBFM DFs calculate tificant contr ie to the rem olated for so iExcavation.

BFM scenarrent for eac hvide the dos ggregate of calculation aadionuclide racterizatio no applied t orrounding L Aharacterizati nt soil cont ad. Due tothe direct ds not techni ceralized ass usimilar to t honcrete was tion. ios, Cs-137, nal ROCs f oremaining rher detailed ionuclide m inuclide mi xhe HTD rad iTD radionuc lhe mixture fthe total ribution was was 0.009%

ouite radionu c.06E-02 mr eoil ROC f oes not beca uthe relative ibutors, sele coved insigni fil and for e aThe final l rios but the

h. Attachme ne percentag ethe insigni fand the resumixture fra cn results.

o soil. Resu lACBWR indon survey r eamination i no the very determinati ocally feasibl umption th ahe source oconsidered Co-60 and Sor LACBWRradionuclide evaluation.

ixture in Ta bxture fractio nionuclides a rlides are bas efractions ass isample ac t very of the clides em/yr or the use it dose ct the ficant ach of ist of dose nt 6-3 es for ficant ults of ctions lts of dicate esults n any low on of e due at the f soil to be Sr-90 R soil s are ble 6-ns are re not ed on igned tivity, La CrossLicense TRevisionThe potethe most the adjusThe doseThe 2.17 (0.68 mrinsignifi cHTD radreview o concentratotal samthe maximmean actscenario

contributthat the

approachwould ac6-3. As anothworst cascore samhomogen1/2 inch, t(see Attais that e vWTB rescase valu As a co2.179% DCGLs aSee Tabl of insignse Boiling WTermination n 0 ential effect limiting in sstment of so e percentage 9% value r erem/yr) at t hcant contrib udionuclide c of the charac tations of in smple activity mum 2.179%tivity of the is 0.787 m rtors of only insignifica nh values cor rctually be cl oher example

,se dose con mples taken neously dist rthe worst c aachment 6-3

)ven in this wsults in an i nue of 2.179

%onservative (calculated and BFM Des 6-19 to 6ificant cont r T Water Reacto rPlan of mixture vsignificant c oil DCGLs a nranged fro mepresents th ehe dose li mutors remai noncentratio nterization d asignificant cup to and e

% value wa sselected co rrem/yr with 0.086% (0.

0nt radionuc lresponding t oser to 0.08 6, the concre tsequences ain the WTributed over ase dose co n). This resu lworst case snsignificant c%. measure, t hfor the Gr oDose Factors

-23 for the aributor dose able 6-19 SCr variability oontributor d ond BFM Dom 0.403% to e hypothetic amit of 25 m rn constant a sns will incre aata over a ra ncontributor rxceeding a ts calculated fre samples i sa correspo n021 mrem/y rlides woul do 25 mrem/

y6% than the te core sam pare from the TB is 1.2E

+the entire s unsequence wlt obviously scenario, th econtributor dhe most li moundwater s cto account adjusted soil percent was Soil DCGLsContributo r ROC Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 6-37 on dose is c oose percent aose Factors (2.179%.

al dose cont rrem/yr, assus activity in case linearly wnge of total aradionuclide stotal activit yfor the WT Bs used the d onding dose pr) (see Atta cd remain a tyr and that t h2.179% va lples taken dWTB basem+04 pCi/g.

urface of the was 155 mreindicates t he dose base ddose percen tmiting insig ncenario for for the insi gDCGLs and performed fs for ROC Ar Dose Frac tAdjusted S(pC1.25E6.40E5.65Eonservative lage from all (i.e. 2.179

%ribution of t huming that tcreases. H owith dose u pactivity in t hs are below y representi nB Groundwa tose calculat epercentage achment 6-3)

.t their MD he insignifi clue calculat eduring char ament. The Assuming e WTB base mem/yr for th ehat remediat id on actual ctage of 1.58 7nificant dos the WTB) gnificant co nd BFM Dosefor Buried PAdjusted fortion Soil DCGLs Ci/g) E+01 E+03 E+01 ly accounte dof the scen a% as seen in he insignifi cthe mixture owever, it is p to 25 mre mhe samples, i MDC overng 25 mrem/ter scenario

.ed for the Wattributed to

. The realis C values acant contrib ued using the acterization taverage tot athat the a vment (101.9 e WTB Excion is neces score conce n7% which i sse contribut owas used t ntributor do se Factors. A Pipe. See se cr Insignificad for by ap parios evalua tAttachment cant radionu c fractions ounlikely th am/yr. Base dit is clear th ar a wide ra n/yr. For exa

m. When the aWTB Ground wthe insigni ftic expectat ias concentr autor dose fr amixture in Tthat represe nal activity f overage activ im2) to a de pavation sce nsary but the ntrations fro ms below the wor percenta go adjust th ese (Referen cseparate an action 6-18.

ant plying ted to 6-3). clides of the at the d on a at the nge of mple, actual water ficant ion is ations action Table nt the or the ity is pth of nario. point m the worst ge of e soil ce 5). alysis La CrossLicense TRevisionCCCCThe mixcontributinsignifi cdose imp se Boiling WTermination n 0 TableROC Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 TableROC Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 TableROC Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 TableROC Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 ture fractio ntors is listed cant contrib upact and was Water Reacto rPlan e 6-20 ReInsIe 6-21 WTCoIn624e 6-22 WGCoIn114e 6-23 ReInsIn115n for the R Oin Table 6-2utors is attri b therefore i nr eactor Buil dsignificant CInsitu GW 4.87E-01 5.05E+00 1.76E-01 TB BFM DFontributor Dnsitu GW 6.66E-02 2.93E+00 4.16E-02 GTV BFM ontributor Dnsitu GW 1.20E-01 1.10E+00 4.79E-02 emaining Stsignificant CRensitu GW 1.40E-02 1.19E+00 5.28E-03 OC and the

24. Note th abutable to Nncluded in t h6-38 ding BFM DContributo rReactor Buil d(mreInsitFs for ROCDose Fracti oWTB A(mreInsituDFs for R ODose Fracti oWGTV A(mreInsituructures B FContributo remaining Stru(mreInsitumixture fr aat the major iNi-63 (with ahe group of i nDFs for RO Cr Dose Fra cding Adjustedem/yr per mCtu Drillin g Spo1.19E-01 2.11E-04 2.91E-02 C Adjusted fon Adjusted BFMem/yr per mCu Drilling Spo1.17E+00 2.08E-03 2.86E-01 OC Adjustedon Adjusted BFMem/yr per mCu Drilling Spo6.08E-01 1.07E-03 1.48E-01 FM DFs forr Dose Fra cuctures Ad justem/yr per mCu Drilling Spo1.34E-01 2.36E-04 3.26E-02 action for t hity of the 0.

1a fraction o fnsignificant C Adjusted ction d BFM DFs Ci) oils for InsignifiM DFs Ci) oils d for Insi gnM DFs Ci) oils r ROC Adjuction ted BFM DFs Ci) oils he aggregat e1013 mixtu rf 0.08) whi ccontributor sfor Excavation1.58E+00 3.08E-03 3.50E-01 icant Excavation2.10E+01 4.08E-02 4.63E+00 nificant Excavation7.00E+00 1.37E-02 1.54E+00 usted for Excavation3.52E+00 6.85E-03 7.75E-01 e of insigni fre fraction f och has a ver ys. ficant or the y low La CrossLicense TRevisionC6.14.A check concentrathe resid uthe fill d unot in th eInsitugw +complianconcentraA6.15.As discuconsidereaccordancomplianforeseeabscenario A quantisimple quless thanintake ra tA dose airrigatio ningestionlivestockscenario assessmeThe Resiused for contaminopposed root deptse Boiling WTermination n 0 TConcentrati ocalculatio nations of R Oual radioact iuring base me concrete.

+ BFM Insi tnce (see LT Pations were Alternate L aussed in sec ted, Residen nce with N Unce, but we rble" land us eis "signific aitative eval uualitative e vn the dose fr te would be assessment on) was perfo rn and fruit a nk would be r adose assess ments include dident Gard ethe Industr inated zone tto the 1 m dth paramet eWater Reacto rPlan Table 6-24 ICons in Exca vn was perfo rOC in fill mivity in the cment concret eThe calcul atuds + BFM P Chapter 5

)less than th eand Use Sce tion 6.4, t wt Gardener UREG-1757, re used to re. NUREG-ant" then gr euation of th evaluation co nom the Ind uless. of the Resi drmed. The Rnd vegetabl eaised on the ment was p ed the ROC a tener soil do sial Use soil thickness w adepth assum eer was adde r ROC anMixtureROC Co-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 Insignificant Contributors Total vated Fill Mrmed in Re material after concrete wa se excavatio nation was b aExcavation

.). For all R Oe surface soi lnario Dose wo alternate with onsit ethese less lrisk-inform 1757 states teater assura ne dose from ncluded tha tustrial Use sdent Garden eResident Ga res from an osite so the merformed fo rt their respe cse was calc udose assess as changed ed in the sc rd since the 6-39 nd Insignifice Fractions Mixture F0.00.000.870.101.0Material ference 8 t oexcavation.

s instantly r en. Therefore

,ased on BF M. The summ aOC and all b al DCGLs. "less likely e well and Rlikely but p lthe decisio that if the p nce that the s the Recrea tt the dose th scenario bec aer scenario (rdener path wonsite garde nmeat and m ir backfilled cctive mixtur ulated with ment with tto more cl oreening app rplant path wcant Radio nFractions 122 091 774 013 00 o determin e The calcu leleased to th

, the source M DFs that wation DF w iasements, t hbut plausi bRecreationa llausible sce nn of Indus teak dose fr ocenario is u ntional Use shan the Recr eause the oc c(with onsite ways includ en. It was co nilk pathway sconcrete an de fractions athe RESRAthe paramet eosely repres roach used i nway is acti vnuclide e the maxi mlation assu me fill and u nterm would were the su mill be applie dhe hypotheti cble" land us l Use with narios were trial Use as om a less li knlikely wou lscenario wa seational Us ecupancy ti mwell for dr ed direct dos nsidered hi gs were inact id soil sourc eas listed in TAD determi ner changes lent actual sn the Indust rve in the R emum hypoth med that 10 0niformly mi xbe in the fi lmmation of d during F Rcal maximu me scenarios onsite wel lnot analyz ethe "reaso nkely put pla uld be necess as not requir ee scenario wme and well winking wate e, inhalatio nghly unlikel yive. The alt ee terms. The Table 6-24.

nistic para mlisted below site conditio rial scenari oesident Gar detical 0% of xed in ll and BFM RS for m fill were l. In ed for nably usible ary. ed. A will be water r and n, soil y that ernate dose meters . The ns as o. The dener La CrossLicense TRevisionscenario.

5512). TCInFFFLDDThe asse two waysprovide tthe alter nequal toconcentracould notdecommisection 6The soil identifie dwas the Scenario

hypothet excavate section 6The doseScenario determinabove to it is proj eThe resuas-left c oGardenercomplianExcavati low dosefor the comparisse Boiling WTermination n 0 The remai nThe paramet eContaminate dnhalation R araction of T raction of Truit, Vegeta bLeafy Veget aDrinking Wa tDepth of Ro ossment of t hs. First, the mthe most ac cnate scenari oo the maxiations that rt plausibly oissioned wh i6.4). The do sdose from t d during ch ahypothetic aDCGLs, th ical maxim ud and spre a6.14). The r ee from backassuming nistic param erepresent t hected to con tulting Resid eondition at tr dose fro mnce during Fon (see LT Pe from the BWTB in thson, when t hWater Reacto rPlan ning param eers changes ad Zone Thic kate - 8400 m 3ime Spent I nime Spent Oble and Gra iable Consu mter Intake -

4ots - 1.22 m.

he soil dose maximum socurate estim ao dose was imum allowresult in 25 occupy the Lich was con sse calculatio nhe Resident aracterizatio nal maximume dose was um radionu cad on the g resulting dos ekfilled con cthe BFM Ieters used fhe Resident Gtain the maj oent Gardene rthe time of m the BFMFRS will b eP Chapter 5)

BFM Insitu she Industri ahe 30 year d er eter change sare: kness - 0.15 m3/yr, ndoors - 0.6 4Outdoors - 0.

in Consump tmption - 21.4 478 L/yr, from the R eoil concentr aate of dose fcalculated awable soil mrem/yr).

TLACBWR siservatively ans are docu mGardener an as the so um soil con c31.4 mrem/

yclide conce nround surfa ce from the Rcrete was a lInsitu geo mfor the BF MGardener sc ority of resi dr dose from license ter mM Insitu sce e the summ a which is d oscenario. F oal Use sce necay period i6-40 s are metab om, 49, 124, tion - 112 k g, esident Gard ations identi from soil in assuming th econcentrati The doses wite until afte rassumed to bmented in R elternate sce nurce term w acentrations tyr. A dose antrations in ce during t hResident Gar dlso calculat emetry descr iM Insitugw doenario. The dual radioac tbackfilled cmination) w anario is lo wation of the ominated by or example, tnario, assu mis included t holic and be hg/yr, ener alterna tfied during cthe Reside ne ROC concions in th ewere calcul ar the G-3 pl abe 30 years eference 8.

nario using tas 0.66 mr ethat could rassessment wfill materi ahe excavati odener was 2 6ed for the Ribed in se cose assess mWTB was utivity at lice nconcrete in as 0.94 mre mw because BFM Insi t the Excava the dose fr oming no dehe dose is 0

.havioral (fr ote scenario wcharacteriz ant Gardener scentrations we Industria lated assumi nant ceased oafter licens ethe maximu mem/yr. Whe nremain giv ewas also pe ral. The fill ion of struct u6.9 mrem/y rResident G action 6.11.1 ment were mused for the nse termina tthe insitu g em/yr. Note tthe BFM Dtugw + BFMation Scenar iom the BFMecay, is 1.

7.84 mrem/y rom NUREGwas perfor mation were u sscenario. Se cwere theoret il Scenario ng that a re soperation an de terminatio nm concentr an the source en the Ind urformed usi nis assumed ure concret er. ardener Alt

e. The RES modified as assessment tion. eometry (i.

ethat the Re sDFs applie dM Insituds + io. This res uM Insitu geo m77 mrem/yr

.r. G/CR-med in sed to cond, ically (i.e., sident d was n (see ations term ustrial ng the to be e (see ernate RAD listed since e., the sident d for BFM ults in metry . For La CrossLicense TRevisionThe finaBFM Exlimitatio nalternate

soil. HowIn conclunot signi fB6.16.The BFMthe conccalculati nacceptabAlthoughthe BasemReferencdemolitioLcoLThese limrate) andensure thacceptabcomplianTo compdemolitiomeasuremair democontaminopen airidentifie dThe doseopen air

assessmeof potentplausibleTable 5.1but is uconcentralimit are demonstrse Boiling WTermination n 0 l considerat xcavation S cn that the e xscenario dowever, the d ousion, the d oficant and t hBFM Elevat eM is a mixin gcentration a nng Area Fac ility of elev ah AFs are n oments are l ice 14. The on of struct uLess than 2 moncrete. Less than 1,0 mits define td removabl ehat the dose le. The o pnce calculati oply with the on. These sment modes

.olition coul dnation poten tr demolitio nd and remed e from a hy pdemolition ent was to f utial dose. T he" scenario (1, the scena rsed to hel pation that c oacceptable, ration using Water Reacto rPlan ion is the dcenario. Be cxcavated co nose from ex cose from co nose from th eherefore gre aed Area Co ng model tha tnd distribut itors (AFs) i nated areas o fot applicabl emited by thBasements ures above 6 3mR/hr beta-g00 dpm/10 0the accepta be contamina tto the pub lpen air dem oons for 10 Copen air d esurveys wil

l. Scanning cd include utial. The pr en will prov iated.

pothetical m alimits was eurther "risk-ihe Worst-C a(as defined rio is not a np "risk info rould remain assuming athe BFM D Fr dose from t hcause the B ncrete woul dcavated con cncrete woul de Recreatio nater assuran cnsideration t uses the to tion of the rn conjuncti of activity do ee to the BF Me implemen twill be re m36 foot elev agamma total cm2 beta-gable operatio ntion that ca nlic from air bolition limi tCFR 20.140 2emolition li ml use conve ncoverage fo rup to 100%

e-remediati oide confid eaximum conevaluated u sinform" the aase Drillin gin NUREG-nalyzed for crm" and ju in elevate dll activity i sFs. 6-41 he Resident FM Excavad not excee dcrete would d be less sin cnal Use and ce that these s tal inventor yresidual radon with con ces not apply

.M, the maxi mtation of th emediated to ation. The osurface con tamma loose snal levels o f n remain p rborne conta mts are oper a2. mits, radiolo gntional gam r pre-remed iof the ac con surveys p eence that c oncentration t hsing the drilacceptabilit yg Spoils ass e-1757, Tabl compliance wstify the d ed areas after s accounted Gardener a lation conce pd the surfac ebe essential ce plants ca nResident G ascenarios wy as the sour cdioactivity.

centration-ba. mum concene open air d ethe open a iopen air de mtamination osurface cont ffixed (as mrior to ope nmination ge national leve lgical surve ymma instrum eiation surve ycessible sur ferformed to ontaminatio nhat could re mlling spoils sy of a worst

-essment is cle 5.1). Co nwith the 10 ecision that remediatio nfor and incl lternative s cptual model e soil DCG Lly the same nnot be gro wardener alte rwill not occu rce term and The stand aased DCGLsntrations tha temolition li mir demoliti omolition limi ton contact w itamination.

measured by n air demoli tnerated dur ils and are nys will be p eents in typi cys on struct uface area d prepare bui ln above th emain after r escenario. T h-case condit iconsidered ansistent wit hCFR 20.14 0the hypot hn to the 2 mluded in the cenario giv eis based o nLs, the max ias calculat ewn in concre trnate scenar r is unneces sis independ eard approac hs to determi nt could rem amits descri bon limits pr its are: ith structur acontact exp tion. The ling demolit inot a part oerformed pr ical scannin gures prior to epending o nlding surfac ee limits w iemediation the purpose oion in the c oa "less likel yh NUREG 02 dose crit ehetical max imR/hr demofinal comp len the n the imum ed for te. ios is sary. ent of h for ne the ain in bed in ior to al osure limits ion is of the ior to g and open n the es for ill be to the of the ontext y but 1757, erion, imum olition liance La CrossLicense TRevisionThe Worinto a shypothet terminatito be excvery unliimmediathitting a nFrom Recontaminin 2 mR/have esseof loose

corresponarea conpCi/g.

Also fromSpoils scCs-137. approximhypothet meet theDemonstsufficien tmaximumS6.17.The REScontamindose for from a smReferencused to c1.0 m2 toThe AFssmaller aThe full RAFs are p se Boiling WTermination n 0 rst-Case Dr ipot of resi dical Cs-137 ion taking n ocavated and ikely for tw otely after li cn area conta ieference 8, nation throu g/hr at conta centially no e"dust" is t rnds to appr ontaining uni fm Referenc ecenario, ass uTherefore, mately 10,0 0ical maxim ue 2 mR/hr trating com pt to accoun tm concentra toil Area F aSRAD modenated. Isola ta given co nmaller area i ce 8 calcula tcalculate so io 100 m2. Ths were calc uarea by the s oRESRAD Suprovided in TWater Reacto rPlan illing Spoils dual radioa cconcentrat io credit for dbrought to o reasons.

Fcense termin ining the m aassuming a ngh the first hct is approxi effect on th erivial. For eoximately 4 5form radioa ce 8, the Cs-1 uming one-hthe dose 0/80,000*2 5um area of open air dpliance wit ht for the a ctions. actors eling for s oted areas o f ncentration.

s defined as tes AFs for eil DCGLs.

The need to aulated by di voil DCGLs iummary RepTable 6-25.

r scenario a sctivity in bion. The dr idecay. The the surface First, the scation. Seco naximum hyp on arbitrary chalf inch of mately 10,0 e dose rate bexample, a 5 pCi/cm2 coctivity thro u37 concent rhalf inch co nfrom this 5 = 3.1 mre mresidual ra ddemolition h the dose cctivity, and aoil assumes fcontaminat iThe ratio o fthe Area F aeach ROC uThe "Area oapply AFs t oviding the p Cin Table 6-7 ports are pr o 6-42 ssumes that basement fl olling I assu mentire inve nwhile mixi nenario assu mnd, the prob aothetical co ncircular are aconcrete, th e00 pCi/g C sbecause the aloose conta mompared to 2ugh a half iration that wntamination "less like lm/yr and is dioactivity, blimit, is n criterion usi nassess the dthat the e nion that are f the dose f ractor (AF).

using RESR Aof Contami no contamina tCi/g per 25

. ovided elect rthe water s uoor concret umed to occ untory within ng with ove rmes that a wability of an ntamination a with a 3 6e Cs-137 c os-137. The l activity ass omination le v29,000 pCi/

cinch layer awould result idepth, was ly but pla unot signific abeyond that ot justified ng the total dose, in the ntire area wsmaller tha nrom the full AD with th enated Zone "ted areas gr emrem/yr v aronically wi tupply well ie that con tur immediatthe drill dia mrburden fill water suppl yassumed ei glevel durin g6 inch diam eoncentration evels of loo ociated with vel of 10,0 0cm2 total in vat a concen tin 25 mrem

/approximat usible" sce nant. Furthe rrequired f oon a riskinventory aareas with within the L n 7500 m2 wsource ter me determini s" parameter eater than 1 0alue from R Eth Referenc eis drilled di rtains the h itely after li cmeter is ass uand soil. T hy well is ins tght inch bor g drilling is l eter and un ithat would rse contami na very thin 00 dpm/100ventory in a 1tration of 1 0/yr in the D rely 80,000 pnario woul dr reduction oor remediati ok-informed band BFM Dthe hypoth SE, 7500 mwill have a lm area to the stic paramet ewas varied 00 m2 is unliESRAD for e 8. The res urectly ighest cense umed his is talled ehole ow. iform result nation layer 0 cm2 1 cm2 0,000 rilling pCi/g d be of the on to basis. DFs is etical m2, is lower dose er set from ikely. each ulting La CrossLicense TRevisionRadionuCs-137 Co-60 Sr-90 B6.18.Buried psection dThe calcu6.18.1.SWith the to remainpotential

Water froimpactedcontaminrequired DCGLs characterpotential

discussedresults i nthen sam6.18.2.EConsistenmaterial, buried pifrom burNUREG-the radio

piping atconceptuthat no mbetween The concdevelopeof the pi pse Boiling WTermination n 0 uclide Buried Pipi niping is defi describes th eulations are ource Ter mexception on at LACBWis minimal.

om LACBWd because t hnation and wfor non-im pfor buried rization has . The radi od in LTP C hndicate that tmples will be Exposure Sc nt with the two expos uipe being e xied pipe re m-1757, App enuclide con ct LACBWR ual model is mixing is as spipes durin gceptual mo ded for the B Fpe is assum eWater Reacto rPlan Table1m2 9.44 9.11 11.22 ng Dose Ass ened as belo we buried pipperformed bm and Radi oof a portion oWR was ass o See Table 6WR Crib Ho uhey only co nwill contin upacted areas. pipe were been perf oonuclide mi xhapter 5, if cthe buried panalyzed fo enario and guidance i ure scenario sxcavated an dmaining in si tendix J stat ecentration i nis a minim umore conse rsumed to oc cg excavatio ndels for the bFM. In the Ied to instan tr e 6-25 Su2m2 5.56 5.42 6.66 essment an dw ground pi pe dose asse sby RESRADonuclide Mi of the Circ uociated wit h6-2 for list ouse to G-3 a nntacted clea nue operatio n calculated ormed in bxture is as scontinuing c piping dose cr HTD radi oCritical G rn NUREG-s were cons d spread ac rtu (Insitu sc ees that it sh on the analys ium of 1 m brvative than cur with then. buried pipe IInsitu scena rtaneously re l6-43 urface Soil AArea F5333d DCGL pe located o ssment met hD and Excel sxture ulating Wate rh contamina tof buried pi pnd Well wat en river wat en after lice nfor the i nburied pipin sumed to b eharacterizat icould excee donuclides an droup 1757, App eidered; 1) i nross the sur fenario).

ould be app rs, including below grade

.the NUREGe soil in the Insitu and Erio the resid ulease and m iArea Facto rFactors m2 .07 .01 .69 outside of st rhods and pr ospreadsheet ar System Pi pted systems pe to remain er piping fo rer or groun dnse termina tnitial suite ng due to t he the same ion is perfo rd 50% of t hd additional endix J reg anadvertent i nface (Exca vropriate to uany intersp

e. The LAC BG-1757, Ap p1 m cover oExcavation sual radioact ix with a th irs 10m2 2.04 2.00 2.45 ructures and ovides the ras detailed i npe, none of and theref on. The High r Well #3 ar edwater wit htion. No D Cradionuclid ethe very lo was listed i nrmed for bu he 25 mrem/

yassessment sarding asse sntrusion w hvation scena ruse the arit hersing clea nBWR buriedpendix J co nor the inters pscenarios ar etivity on the in 2.54 cm l100m21.19 1.18 1.41 basements.

resulting D Cn Reference the buried pore contami nPressure S ee considere dh no potenti aCGLs or FSes. To dat ew contaminn Table 6-3ried pipe a nyr dose crit es performed ssment of bhich results irio), and 2) hmetic aver an soil. The bd pipe exca vnceptual mo dpersing clea ne similar to internal su rayer of soil This CGLs. 8. piping nation ervice d non-al for SS is e, no nation 3. As nd the erion, . buried in the dose age of buried vation del in n soil those rfaces in an La CrossLicense TRevisionarea equareleased presence assumptiflowable

to be conscenario

ground s surface dWorker iand soil m6.18.3.BRESRADDCGLs fThe burieand grouis designPipe onlysignifica nthe site.

The Insiinclude tinput parterm geothan one the thin basementinsitu do

table. T hFlow" w area equaThe insitInsitu Grelevationinternal sthe ExcaCirculati ncalculate6.18.4.BThe RESReferencse Boiling WTermination n 0 al to the in tradioactivit yof the pip eon, particulfill materia lnservative o nmodel assu murface after disturbance cis exposed t omodels. Buried Pipi nD modeling for the inter ned piping w uping of all inated as the "y. The separ ntly differe ntu dose cal cthe Circulat irameters ap pometry (see Tmeter belo wlayer (2.54 t floor, i.e..

,se, which is he assumed ere calculat eal in size to ttu dose for roundwater pn of the bo tsurface area avation scen ang Water D surface soi lBuried Pipe SRAD Summce 8. The ful lWater Reacto rPlan ternal surfa cy as a bel oe to reduce arly for the

l. The assu mn the sensit imes that the excavation.

caused by t ho the Insitu ang Dose Ass ewas perfo rnal surfaces as separate dimpacted bu r"Group". T hation of the nt from the oculation fo rng Water Dplied to the BTable 6-26).

w the groun dcm) sourc e, the WGTVdriven by t hRESRAD paed assumin gthe summed the Circula tparameters wttom of the of the pipe

.arios (and cDischarge Pl DCGLs wi tDCGLs Inimary Report l RESRAD Sr ce area of t how ground 2environme nCirculatin gmption of a tivity analys ireleased ra d A 15 cm mhe large scal eand Excavat eessment rmed to ca lof the pipes d into two c aried pipe ot hhe second c aCirculating other pipe a nr the buried Discharge pi pBFM Insitu G The depth d surface in e term was V at 621 foo the groundw aarameters "

Ag that the all internal sur ting Water Dwith the ele vpipe (630

f. See Table correspondi nPipe were c th source te rtial Suite file names fSummary Re6-44 he pipe. Th e2.54 cm la yntal transpo rg Water Dis cthin soil mi xis for the B Fdioactivity i smixing layer e excavatio ned soil via t hlculate DS Rafter conve rategories. T hher than the ategory consWater pipe wnd the pipes piping "G rpe) was per fGroundwate rof the burie dorder to be nominally at elevation.

ater pathwa yArea of Con of the pipe face area of Discharge Pvation of th efoot). The c6-26 for th eng DCGLs) falculated u srm adjustme nfor the RES Reports are st o e Insitu sce nyer of soil wrt and migr acharge Pipe xing layer f oFM (see sec ts mixed wit his assumed n required t ohe same pat hRs which ar rting units t ohe first cate gCirculating isted of the was necess aare located iroup" (whi cformed by Rr scenario wd piping va rbelow the fassumed to Using a lo wy, by minimi zntaminated Zin the grou pfall Group p iPipe was als e thin conta mcontaminate de source ter mfor both th esing the R Ents as listed RAD Buried ored electro nnario model with no cre dation. This i which wil lor buried m ation 6.11.1) h a 15 cm l adue to the o remove pi phways appli cre the basis o dpm/100 c mgory includ eWater Dis cCirculating ary because tin distinctly ch as statedRESRAD mowith adjustm eries but is i nfreeze zone.

be the sa mwer elevati ozing the dis tZone" and "

Lp was locat eipes. so calculate dminated lay ed area was m parameter e Buried Pi pESRAD parin Table 6-2Piping run snically. Th eassumes th adit taken f ois a conser vl be filled waterial was s

h. The Exca vayer of soil oextensive g rpe. The Ind ucable to the for deter mm2. ed the sum mcharge Pipin gWater Disc hthe geometr ydifferent p ad above doe odeling usi nents to the s on all cases g rThe elevati me as the d eon maximiz etance to the wLength Para led in one ci rd using the er being set aset equal t rs. The dose pe Group a nrameters us e26. s are listed i ne detailed in pat the or the vative with a hown vation on the round ustrial BFM mining mation g and harge y was arts of s not ng the ource reater on of eepest es the water llel to rcular BFM at the o the from nd the ed to n puts La CrossLicense TRevisionCAZTCLAUT to the DCresulting Excel sprprovided6.18.5.BThe Buricontributfinal ROcontributfractions The dosepipe scenall buriedSr-90 andThe dosepipe DCGinsignifi c6-3 containitial su icontribut se Boiling WTermination n 0 Table 6-ParameCover Depth (

mArea of Conta mZone (m2) Thickness of Contaminated zLength Parallel Aquifer Flow (

mUnsaturated Zo Thickness (m)

CGL calcul aRESRAD Dreadsheet a sd in Table 6-2Buried Pipe ied Pipe D Ctions from t hCs and adj utors. The d ofrom Table e percentag enarios; Insit ud pipe scena rd Cs-137.

e percentage sGL categori ecant radion uains a copy oite and the dtors that we rWater Reacto rPlan -26 RESRter m) minated zone (m) to m) ne ation, inclu dDSRs geners described i27. Radionucli dCGLs in Ta bhe initial sui tust the RO Cose percen t6-3. es for the i nu and Excav arios and the s for the ins ies. Therefor euclide fracti oof Table 24 fdose percent are removed.

r RAD SourcDCGLBuried Pipe Group Insitu 5.465 1349.71 0.0254 41.45 0.61 ding RESRArated by m oin Referenc edes of Con cble 6-27 we rte radionucl iCs for the d otages for t hnitial suite r aation. The f isame as ide ignificant c oe, adjustme nons were cal cfrom Refere nages attribut 6-45 ce Term Pa rL Calculati oBuried PGroup Excavati0 1349.70.1541.456.0706AD source t eodeling and e 8. The bu rcern and A dre used in Rides, identif yose fraction ahe initial s uadionuclide sinal list of i nntified for s oontributors wnts to the B uculated sepa rnce 5 which able to the arameters fo rons Pipe p ion CircuWaDischPi In2.1 7660.01606 3.erm parame all unit co nried pipe D Cdjusted DCGReference 5 ty the insign iattributable uite were c as were calc unsignificant coil and base were differe nuried Pipe D Crately for e ah provides th aggregate of r Buried Pi pulating ater harge ipe nsitu CiDEx74 6.14 0254 0.02 33 eter calculat inversions ar CGLs for t hGLs to calculate ificant contr ito the rem oalculated u sulated for e acontributors ments. The Rnt for each o fCGLs to ac cach of the fo ue dose perc ethe insigni fiping irculating Water Discharge Pipe xcavation 0 766.14 0.15 160.02 6.0706 ions, a list oe provided he initial sui tthe relative ibutors, sele coved insigni fsing the m iach of the bwas the sa mROCs are Cf the four b ucount for the ur. Attachm eentages for t hficant of the in an te are dose ct the ficant ixture buried me for Co-60, uried ent he La CrossLicense TRevision RadCEEEPPPPAACC The dose1.961%. insignifi cThe finalExcavati i.e., the iare provi se Boiling WTermination n 0 dionuclide (H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239 Pu-240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243 Cm-244 e fraction oTable 6-28 pcant dose pe rl DCGLs to on scenario snsitu and e xided in Tabl eWater Reacto rPlan TabBuried Pipe Group Insitu (dpm/100 cm 24.69E+08 1.82E+07 0.00E+00 1.12E+10 9.12E+06 4.67E+10 5.84E+05 1.01E+08 2.33E+07 2.57E+07 1.46E+09 2.68E+09 1.43E+11 1.50E+06 7.85E+05 7.93E+05 5.14E+07 1.82E+06 1.49E+06 7.57E+08 3.03E+08 of the aggr eprovides th ercentage. be used d us must be s uxcavation sc ee 6-29. r ble 6-27 B2) Buried PExca(dpm/14.652.435.951.528.435.553.991.278.793.601.821.706.629.908.918.923.046.521.111.711.59egate of the e final Burie during FSS a cummed in th eenarios ma y6-46 Buried Pip iipe Group vation 100 cm2) 5E+09 E+10 5E+10 2E+11 E+04 5E+10 9E+07 7E+05 9E+07 0E+05 2E+05 0E+05 2E+06 0E+06 E+06 2E+06 4E+08 2E+06 E+06 E+06 9E+07 insignifica nd Pipe DCG Lccount for t he conceptua ly occur in p aing DCGLsCirculatin gWater Disch aPipe Insitu (dpm/100 c m1.56E+081.53E+070.00E+000.00E+004.92E+071.98E+116.94E+051.01E+087.26E+061.31E+081.45E+121.40E+144.72E+191.04E+077.88E+058.11E+051.11E+083.84E+061.52E+066.63E+083.01E+08nt contribu tLs for the Rhe fact that tl model for arallel. The s g arge m2) CirculDiscEx(dpm627187411311611137112tors ranges ROC adjuste dthe dose fr oburied pipe summed Burlating Water charge Pipe xcavation m/100 cm2) .23E+09 .45E+10 .77E+10 .98E+11 .58E+04 .24E+10 .23E+07 .29E+05 .19E+08 .66E+05 .86E+05 .73E+05 .71E+06 .29E+07 .16E+07 .16E+07 .68E+08 .93E+06 .16E+06 .79E+06 .07E+06 from 0.413 d for the re mom the Insit udose assess mried Pipe D C% to moved u and ment, CGLs La CrossLicense TRevision RadionCo-Sr-Cs- E6.19.There is concentraunder theBuilding In late 2 0and licen1983, prresults.

GgroundwGroundwROCs idirrigatio nGW ExpGuidanceAMCG d se Boiling WTermination n 0 Tabnuclide B(d-60 -90 137 Table 6Existing Grolow poten tations have e Turbine B uindicated p o012, five ad dnse terminat iredominantl yGroundwate rwater contam iwater Expos udentified in n the only e xposure Fact oe Report 1 1drinking wa tWater Reacto rPlan ble 6-28 Buried Pipe Group Insitu dpm/100 cm 29.01E+06 5.77E+05 2.54E+07 6-29 Sumfor Radionucl iCo-60 Sr-90 Cs-137 oundwater Dtial for sign ibeen ident iuilding. Sa mositive grou nditional mo nion. Results y H-3. See r Exposure ination that mure Factors Table 6-24 xposure path wors were t h1 Ingestion ter intake ra tr Buried Pi pInsignifica2) BuriGExc(dpm/8.33.93.5mmed BurieInsignificande BuriG (dpm8.35.63.5Dose ificant grou ified in gro umpling in 1 9ndwater con nitoring wel lindicated l oLTP ChaptFactors w emay be presfor existin gplus H-3.

way from g rherefore cal cDose Convte of 327 L/

y6-47 pe DCGLs fant Radion uied Pipe Group avation /100 cm2) 9E+04 8E+07 9E+05 ed Pipe DC Gnt Radionu cied Pipe Group /100 cm2) 1E+04 9E+05 4E+05 ndwater co nundwater a d983 from a wtamination al pairs were wer ground wter 2 for a ere calculat eent at the ti mg GW conta Because t hroundwater iculated in Rversion Fact yr. See Tabl efor ROCs Auclide Frac tCirculatWater Dis cPipe Insitu(dpm/1004.86.81.2GLs for ROclide Fracti CirculatWater Dis cPipe (dpm/1008.53E+6.70E+3.64E+ntamination djacent to s uwell located dat relatively installed to water conta msummary oed to deter mme of licens eamination whe industri ais potable w aReference 8tors and th ee 6-30. Adjusted fortions ting charge e u 0 cm2) W(d82E+07 80E+05 28E+08 OCs adjustedons ting charge e 0 cm2) +04 +05 +05 to be pres euspected br odown gradi elow concen tsupport sit emination le vof character imine the do e terminatio nwere calcula tal scenario dater from a n8 directly u e assumed ir Circulating Water Discha rPipe Excavation dpm/100 cm 28.55E+04 4.22E+07 3.65E+05 d ent althoug hoken floor dent of the T utrations.

e characteri zvels than fo uization and se from ex in. ted for the does not in n onsite wellsing the F eindustrial wrge 2) h low drains urbine zation und in HSA isting three clude . The ederal worker La CrossLicense TRevision D6.20.As discube made and couldAfter comarea and calculatewhere: The doseburied pimultiplyise Boiling WTermination n 0 RaDemonstrat issed in sect ithrough the d potentiall ympliance is buried pipi n dose and s uComplianMax BFMMax BFMSummatioand BurieMax OpenMax BuriMax Exise for baseme iping is calc uing the ratio Water Reacto rPlan Tabladionuclide Co-60 Cs-137 Sr-90 H-3 ing Compliaion 6.5.5, t hsummation y occur in p ademonstrat eng, the mea nummed as s hnce Dose M Insitu (ds)

M Excavatio non BFM Ins ied Pipe Insit un Land ied Piping E xsting Groun dnts is calcul aulated by divby 25 mre mr le 6-30 GGroance with D he final dem oof dose fro marallel.

ed indepen dn concentrati hown in Equn itu (gw) u xcavationdwater ated directl yviding the mm/yr. Note t h6-48 Groundwate oundwater E(mrem/yr 8.801.644.642.09ose Criteri oonstration o fm exposure dently throu gons or inve nation 6-2. = Dose to I = maximu m(mrem/yr) = maximumbasements

= summati obasements(mrem/yr)= maximum(mrem/yr)= maximum(mrem/yr)= maximumy from mean mean FSS co nhat the BFM r Exposure Exposure Fa cper pCi/L) 0E-03 4E-02 4E-02 9E-05 on f complianc escenarios th gh the FRS ntory values Industrial Wm BFM Insi tm BFM Exc(mrem/yr) on of BFM Is (mrem/yr)

) from all pi pm dose fro m) m dose from

) m dose from n STS result sncentrations Insitugw dos Factors ctors e with the dhat are not mof each str ufrom the F R Worker AMC tuds dose fromcavation dos eInsitugw doseand Buried pe m open land sburied pipi nexisting gr os. The dose fby the DC Gse from the bdose criterio nmutually exc lucture, ope nRS will be u sEquatioG (mrem/yr

)m basement e from e from all Pipe Insitu dsurvey units ng Excavati ooundwater for open lan dGLs and basement n will lusive n land sed to n 6-2 ) s dose on d and La CrossLicense TRevisionassigned Insitugw ScontamincontributgroundwR6.21.1. HR22. EW3. UCo4. URD5. EC6. PR7. PWan8. ED9. AR10. SC11. Z(Cth12. A213. SM14. EDse Boiling WTermination n 0 the Maxim uSummation" nation can e ite to dose fr owater summa tReferences Haley & Ald rReactor, Dai r015. EnergySoluti Water React oU.S. Nuclear Consolidated f Radiologi cU.S. Nuclear Radiation Su rDecember 2 0EnergySoluti Concern Dur iacific Nort hReactor Mat eacific Nort hWithin and And DecommEnergySoluti DCGL and CArgonne Nat iRESRAD 6.0andia Natio nContaminati oZionSolution CRA) Reporhe Zion Res tArgonne Nat i001. heppard an dMajor Soil T yEnergySoluti Demolition LWater Reacto rPlan um BFM Ex term in Eq uither be reta iom well wat etion becaus erich Inc., H yryland Powe ons Techni cor Historical Regulatory Decommisscal Criteria, FRegulatory rvey and As 006. ons Techni cing LACBWhwest Labor aerials, Pacifi chwest Labor aAround Com mmissioning A sons Techni concrete BF Mional Labor a0 and RESR Anal Laborat oon From De cs Technical rt, Evaluatio ntoration Proj ional Labor ad Thibault, Dypes: A Co mons Techni cLimits. r cavation do suation 6-2.

Tined in the c oer, not both.

e it is based oydrogeologi cr Cooperati vcal Support DSite Assess mCommissio nsioning Gui dFinal Repor tCommissio nsessment of cal Support DWR Decommatory, NUR Ec Northwest atory, NUR Emercial Nu cssessment -

cal Support DM Dose Fac tatory, NUR EAD-BUILD ory, NUREGcommission iSupport Do cn of Hydrol oect. atory, User' sDefault Soil/

Smpendium, Hcal Support D6-49 se in Equati oThe two sce noncrete and The Burie donly on the gcal Investig ave, Genoa WDocument Rment (HSA)n, NUREG-1dance - Cha rt - Septemb en NUREG-1Materials a nDocument Rmissioning.

EG/CR-3474Laboratory EG/CR-4289clear Power P1985. Document Rtors. EG/CR-66973.0 Compu tG/CR-5512, Ving Paramet ecument 14-0ogical Para ms Manual fo rSolid /Liqui dHealth Physi Document Ron 6-2 will nnarios are m uexcavated od Pipe Insitu groundwate ration Report

,Wisconsin, F iRS-TD-3131 9). 1757, Volu mracterization er 2006.

1575, Suppl end Equipme nRS-TD-3131 94, Long-Liv e- 1984.

9, Residual RPlants; Orig iRS-TD-3131 97, Develop mter Codes -

DVolume 3, Rer Analysis

-006, Conest ometers in Su pr RESRAD Vd Partition Ccs, Vol. 59 NRS-TD-3131 9not be inclu dutually excl uor released t odose is incl ur pathway.

, La Crosse Bile No. 387 096-003, La Cme 2, Revisi o, Survey, a nement 1, M unt Manual (

M96-001, Ra ded Activatio nRadionuclid ein, Distribut 96-004, LA Cment of Prob aDecember 2 Residual Ra d- October 1 9oga Rovers

&pport of Do sVersion 6, ACoefficients, No 4, Octob 96-005, La Cded in the "

Busive; the o the fill and uded in Boiling Wat 05-008, Janu Crosse Boili non 1, nd Determin aulti-Agency MARSAMEdionuclides on Products i ne Concentra tion, Invent oCBWR Soil abilistic 000. dioactive 999. & Associate sse Modeling ANL/EAD-4,, Kds, for F oer 1990.

Crosse Ope nBFM ter ary ng ation E) - of n tion ory, s for , July our n Air La CrossLicense TRevision se Boiling WTermination n 0 Water Reacto rPlan Figr ure 6-1 S6-50 Site Regionaal Location

La CrossLicense TRevisionse Boiling WTermination n 0 Water Reacto rPlan r Figure 6-26-51 2 Site Ovverview LLRLa Crosse Boili nLicense Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac tation Plan or Figure 6-3 6-52 LACBWR Buildings LLRLa Crosse Boili nLicense Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac tation Plan or Figure 6-4 6-53 LACBWR Ennd State LLRLa Crosse Boili nLicense Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac tation Plan or Figure 6-55 LACBWR6-54 R End State - B ackfilled Stru c ctures La CrossLicense TRevisionFigure 6 se Boiling WTermination n 0 6-6 LACBWater Reacto rPlan BWR End S r State - Bac k6-55 kfilled Rea cctor Buildin g Basementt Elevation V View La CrossLicense TRevision Input param evalue Input par avaluAssign defa ufrom NURE GVol. BehavioralAssign 75% per cTEDE is positi vwith the p ase Boiling WTermination n 0 Fi eter Sensitive

,ameter e ult value G/CR 5512 3 centile value if vely correlated arameter Water Reacto rPlan gure 6-7 AssiTED, lPRCCl > 0.25 r

RESRAD PInput paramet evalueign 25% percentil eDE is negatively c owith the param eClassi"Sensitive "Complete using Assign NUREGPrioInputAssignfrom NURVMetaboClassifyMetaboSelepa6-56 Parameter

er e value if orrelated eter fy parameter as

" or "Non-sensitivsensitivity analys iRESRAD v7.0 distribution from G/CR-6697, Att C ority 1 or 2 t parameter valuedefault value REG/CR 5512 Vol. 3 lic paramete r y as Behavioral, olic, or Physical ect modelarameter Selection F l

ANon-senve" is Classify as Pr i1, 2 or 3low Chart Input parameter value Assign 50% value distribution nsitive, lPRCCl <

0InpuAssignfrom RPiority InpuSavPhysica0.25 ut parameter value n Median value RESRAD v7.0 Priority 3 ut parameter value Site data vailable?

al parameter La Crosse BLicense Te rRevision 0 RBoiling Wat ermination Pl aRESRAD Iner Reactor an nput Param ATTAmeters for L A6-57 CHMENT ACBWR So6-1 oil DCGL UUncertaint y Analysis La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-58

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-59

La CroLicenseRevisio sse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-60

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-61 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-62

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-63

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-64

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-65

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-66

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-67 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-68 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-69 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-70 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-71 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-72 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-73 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-74 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-75 La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-76

La CroLicenseRevisiosse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ter Reacto r Plan 6-77

La CroLicenseRevisioNotes:

a P = phys

b 1 = high

-c D = dete rd Distribu tLognorma Bounded l oTruncated Bounded nBeta: 1 =

mTriangula rUniform:

1e Referen cf ZionSolug Argonnesse Boiling Wa te Termination Pon 0 ical, B = behavioral, M-priority parameter, 2

=rministic, S = stochasti ctions Statistical Paramel-n: 1= mean, 2 = stan dognormal-n: 1= mean, 2lognormal-n: 1= mean

,normal: 1 = mean, 2 = s tminimum, 2 = maximu mr: 1 = minimum, 2 = m o1 = minimum, 2 = max ice: Haley and Aldrich, Iutions Technical Suppo re National Laboratory, "ter Reacto r Plan M = metabolic; (see NU R= medium-priority para mc ters: dard deviatio n 2 = standard deviation,

, 2 = standard deviation tandard deviation, 3 =

mm, 3 = P-value, 4 = Q-v ode, 3 = maximu m imum e Sm-148 an ND-Inc., "Hydrogeological Irt Document 14-003, C "User's Manual for RE S REG/CR-6697, Attach mmeter, 3 = low-priority p

3 = minimum, 4 = ma x, 3 = lower quantile, 4

=minimum, 4 = maximu malue -144 not listed in RESR AInvestigation Repor t Lonestoga Rovers & As sSRAD Version 6", AN L ment B, Table 4.)

parameter (see NURE G

imum = upper quantile m AD FGR 11 DCF file La Crosse Boiling Wate rsociates (CRA) Report, L/EAD 4, July 2001 6-78 G/CR-6697, Attachment

r Reactor, Dairyland P o"Zion Hydrogeologic I n

B, Table 4.1)

ower Cooperative, Gen onvestigation Report" oa, WI" January 2015 La CrossLicense TRevision se Boiling WTermination n 0 RESRADWater Reacto rPlan D Input Pa rr ATTArameters fo r6-79 CHMENT r LACBWR6-2 R BFM Unceertainty Annalysis La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-80

La CroLR osse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-81

La CroLR

osse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-82

La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-83

La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-84

La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-85 La CroLR osse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-86

La CroLR osse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-87

La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-88

La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-89

La CroLR osse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-90

La CroLR

osse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-91 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-92 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-93 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-94 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-95 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-96 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-97 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-98 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-99 La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-100

La CroLRosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 ater Reacto r ation Plan 6-101

La CroLRNabcdLBTBBTUefgosse Boiling W aLicense Termin Revision 0 Notes: a P = physical, B = beh ab 1 = high-priority para mc D = deterministic, S

=d Distributions Statistic aLognormal-n: 1= mean, Bounded lognormal-n:

1Truncated lognormal-n:

Bounded normal: 1 =

mBeta: 1 = minimum, 2

=Triangular: 1 = minimu mUniform: 1 = minimum

,e

Reference:

Haley and f ZionSolutions Techni cg Argonne National La bater Reacto r ation Plan avioral, M = metabolic; meter, 2 = mediu m-prio= stochastic al Parameters: 2 = standard deviation 1= mean, 2 = standard d 1= mean, 2 = standard mean, 2 = standard devi a= maximum, 3 = P-valu em, 2 = mode, 3 = maxi m, 2 = maximum e Sm-1 4Aldrich, Inc., "Hydrog ecal Support Document boratory, "User's Man u (see NUREG/C R-6697ority parameter, 3 = lo w deviation, 3 = minimu mdeviation, 3 = lower q uation, 3 = minimum, 4

=e, 4 = Q-value mum 48 an ND-144 not liste deological Investigation 14-003, Conestoga Ro vual for RESRAD Versio 7, Attachment B, Table w-priority parameter (se e m, 4 = maximu m uantile, 4 = upper quan t= maximum d in RESRAD FGR 11 DReport La Crosse Boi lvers & Associates (CR An 6", ANL/EAD 4, Jul y6-102 4.) e NUREG/CR-6697, At tile

DCF file ling Water Reactor, Da A) Report, "Zion Hydro gy 2001 ttachment B, Table 4.1

)

iryland Power Cooper ageologic Investigation R )

ative, Genoa, WI" Janu aReport" ary 2015 La CrossLicense TRevisionDose se Boiling WTermination n 0 e Contribu tAggregWater Reacto rPlant tion Percen tgate Dose Pr ATTAtage for Ini tPercentage f6-103 CHMENT tial Suite R afrom Insigni6-3 adionuclid eificant Dos e es and Dete re Contribut rmination o ors f La CrosLicense Revision H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/24 4 Insignifica ncontributor dpercentage bon mixture Insignifica ncontributor dpercentage bon actual d aInsignifica ncontributor dbased on ac tdata (mrem

/ se Boiling Wat eTermination P ln 0 Somrem/yr 3.30E-09 2.41E-09 7.21E-09 9.98E-09 2.38E-02 2.12E-07 3.45E-05 1.02E-04 1.86E-06 3.77E-01 8.21E-04 7.61E-04 1.01E-05 2.14E-06

  • 2.18E-06 2.07E-06 8.29E-06 5.21E-06 4* 4.11E-06 nt dose based nt dose based ata 2.60E-02 nt dose tual /yr) er Reactor lant oil DCGLs Dose Fraction 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 5.911% 0.000% 0.009% 0.025% 0.000% 93.653% 0.204% 0.189% 0.003% 0.001% 0.001% 0.001% 0.002% 0.001% 0.001% 0.427% 0.0004% Table 20Rx Bldg Gro umrem/yr 3.14E-06 6.66E-05 6.96E-06 2.59E-06 5.79E-03 5.47E-05 4.45E-02 5.26E-06 1.54E-05 1.50E-01 1.06E-05 1.29E-05 1.14E-06 4.63E-04 4.77E-04 2.10E-04 7.07E-04 7.58E-05 2.26E-05 1.25E+01 0 from Refere nundwater Dose Fraction m0.002% 50.033% 80.003% 70.001% 12.858% 10.027% 221.993% 10.003% 60.008% 474.095% 20.005% 50.006% 40.001% 90.229% 10.235% 10.104% 50.349% 20.037% 30.011% 2 1.054% 10.528% nce 5 ( TSD RS

-Rx Bldg Drilling Sp omrem/yr Dose F5.05E-12 0.0 08.23E-12 0.0 07.14E-12 0.0 01.43E-11 0.0 01.42E-03 5.3 72.82E-10 0.0 01.86E-06 0.0 06.57E-06 0.0 24.64E-11 0.0 02.48E-02 94.

25.10E-05 0.1 94.66E-05 0.1 79.11E-07 0.0 01.56E-08 0.0 01.58E-08 0.0 05.05E-08 0.0 02.54E-07 0.0 03.74E-07 0.0 02.80E-07 0.0 0 0.401.63E+00 0.026-104-TD-313196-0 0oils Rx Fraction mrem/

y00% 2.61E-000% 1.91E-000% 5.70E-000% 7.89E-074% 1.88E-000% 1.67E-007% 2.72E-025% 8.10E-000% 1.47E-0217% 2.98E-094% 6.48E-077% 6.02E-003% 7.97E-000% 1.69E-000% 1.73E-000% 1.64E-001% 6.56E-001% 4.14E-001% 3.25E-0 03% 1.97E+026% 01) - Dose ContBldg Excavation yr Dose Fractio n09 0.000%

09 0.000%

09 0.000%

09 0.000%

02 5.903%

07 0.000%

05 0.009%

05 0.025%

06 0.000%

01 93.661%

04 0.204%

04 0.189%

06 0.003%

06 0.001%

06 0.001%

06 0.001%

06 0.002%

06 0.001%

06 0.001%

0.427% 01 0.336% ribution per RWTB Groun mrem/yr 1.11E-06 2.85E-05 4.91E-13 4.80E-06 7.91E-04 1.63E-05 2.58E-02 4.22E-06 3.62E-06 3.55E-02 3.31E-09 2.85E-11 4.49E-17 7.38E-05 8.75E-04 8.87E-05 5.09E-04 1.33E-04 9.42E-08 7.87E-01 ROC per Scena rundwater Dose Fraction 0.002% 0.045% 0.000% 0.008% 1.238% 0.026% 40.445% 0.007% 0.006% 55.598% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.115% 1.369% 0.139% 0.797% 0.208% 0.000% 2.179% 0.086% rio WTB Drilling Sp omrem/yr Dos e4.96E-11 0

.8.10E-11 0

.7.02E-11 0

.1.41E-10 0

.1.39E-02 5.2.78E-09 0

.1.83E-05 0.6.46E-05 0

.4.57E-10 0

.2.44E-01 945.03E-04 0

.4.59E-04 0

.8.92E-06 0

.1.53E-07 0

.1.55E-07 0

.4.95E-07 0

.2.50E-06 0

.3.67E-06 0

.2.75E-06 0

. 0.3.19E+00 0.oils We Fraction mre m.000% 3.45E

.000% 2.52E

.000% 7.52E

.000% 1.05E376% 2.49E

.000% 2.21E007% 3.60E

.025% 1.07E

.000% 1.95E.213% 3.95E

+.194% 8.59E

.177% 7.96E

.003% 1.06E

.000% 2.23E

.000% 2.28E

.000% 2.17E

.001% 8.65E

.001% 5.47E

.001% 4.30E

.404% 5.19E+.051% WTB Excavation m/yr Dose Fracti o-08 0.000%

-08 0.000%

-08 0.000%

-07 0.000% -01 5.908%

-06 0.000% -04 0.009%

-03 0.025%

-05 0.000%

+00 93.657%

-03 0.204%

-03 0.189%

-04 0.003%

-05 0.001%

-05 0.001%

-05 0.001%

-05 0.002%

-05 0.001%

-05 0.001%

0.427% +01 0.886% on La CrosLicense Revision se Boiling Wat eTermination P ln 0 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239/240*

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244*

Insignificant contributor dos epercentage bas eon mixture Insignificant contributor dos ebased on actua ldata (mrem/yr) Insignificant contributor dos epercentage bas eon actual data er Reactor lant WGTV Gmrem/yr 4.24E-07 9.34E-06 0.00E+00 1.08E-06 1.43E-03 2.06E-06 9.70E-03 9.68E-07 1.81E-06 4.09E-02 7.64E-07 3.59E-07 3.79E-09 1.15E-04 1.99E-04 5.32E-05 2.41E-04 3.12E-05 3.17E-08 e ed e l 2.93E+00 e ed Table 20 fr Groundwate r Dose Fraction 0.001% 0.018% 0.000% 0.002% 2.712% 0.004% 18.424% 0.002% 0.003% 77.619% 0.001% 0.001% 0.000% 0.219% 0.378% 0.101% 0.457% 0.059% 0.000% 1.246% 70.146% om Reference 5WGTV Drilling Smrem/yr D o2.57E-11 4.19E-11 3.64E-11 7.27E-11 7.21E-03 1.43E-09 9.43E-06 3.34E-05 2.36E-10 1.26E-01 92.60E-04 2.38E-04 4.62E-06 7.92E-08 8.02E-08 2.57E-07 1.29E-06 1.90E-06 1.42E-06 7.45E+00 5 (TSD RS-TD Spoils ose Fraction mr e0.000% 1.1 50.000% 8.4 20.000% 2.5 10.000% 3.4 95.380% 8.3 10.000% 7.4 00.007% 1.2 10.025% 3.5 70.000% 6.5 194.210% 1.320.194% 2.8 70.177% 2.6 60.003% 3.5 20.000% 7.4 50.000% 7.6 10.000% 7.2 20.001% 2.8 90.001% 1.8 20.001% 1.4 4 0.403% 7.81E+0.120% 6-105-313196-001) (

cWGTV Excavation em/yr Dose Fra c5E-08 0.000

%2E-09 0.000

%1E-08 0.000

%9E-08 0.000

%1E-02 5.916

%0E-07 0.000

%1E-04 0.009

%7E-04 0.025

%1E-06 0.000

%E+00 93.648

%7E-03 0.204

%6E-03 0.189

%2E-05 0.003

%5E-06 0.001

%1E-06 0.001

%2E-06 0.001

%9E-05 0.002

%2E-05 0.001

%4E-05 0.001

% 0.428%01 1.336% cont.) - Dose CRemainiGroction mrem/yr

% 1.09E-06

% 2.75E-05

% 1.50E-14

% 7.57E-07

% 1.66E-04

% 2.11E-06

% 1.05E-02

% 6.73E-07

% 3.92E-06

% 4.51E-03

% 2.24E-10

% 1.21E-12

% 6.84E-19

% 8.99E-06

% 1.38E-04

% 2.07E-05

% 7.14E-05

% 2.06E-05

% 1.24E-07

% 1.25E+00

% ontribution p eing Basements oundwater Dose Fraction 0.007% 0.177% 0.000% 0.005% 1.072% 0.014% 67.909% 0.004% 0.025% 29.109% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.058% 0.891% 0.134% 0.461% 0.133% 0.001% 1.910% 0.095% er ROC per Sc eRemaining Basem eSpoilsmrem/yr D5.66E-12 9.21E-12 8.02E-12 1.61E-11 1.59E-03 3.16E-10 2.09E-06 7.37E-06 5.21E-11 2.78E-02 5.73E-05 5.23E-05 1.02E-06 1.75E-08 1.77E-08 5.66E-08 2.85E-07 4.18E-07 3.14E-07 2.38E+00 enario nts Drilling RemaDose Fraction m r0.000% 5.

70.000% 4.

20.000% 1.

20.000% 1.

75.376% 4.

10.000% 3.

70.007% 6.

00.025% 1.

70.000% 3.

294.213% 6.

60.194% 1.

40.177% 1.

30.003% 1.

70.000% 3.

70.000% 3.

80.000% 3.

60.001% 1.

40.001% 9.

10.001% 7.

1 0.403% 5.69E0.038% aining Basements Exca vrem/yr Dose Fra78E-09 0.00 023E-09 0.00 026E-08 0.00 075E-08 0.00 018E-02 5.91 171E-07 0.00 004E-05 0.00 979E-04 0.02 526E-06 0.00 062E-01 93.65 444E-03 0.20 433E-03 0.18 977E-05 0.00 375E-06 0.00 182E-06 0.00 164E-06 0.00 145E-05 0.00 214E-06 0.00 119E-06 0.00 1 0.427E+01 0.972vation action 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 9% 5% 0% 4% 4% 9% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 7% 2%

La CrossLicense TRevisionTable 22Percent H-3C-14Fe-55Ni-59Co-6Ni-63Sr-90Nb-9Tc-99Cs-13Eu-15Eu-15Eu-15Pu-23Pu-239/Pu-24Am-24Am-24Cm-243 se Boiling WTerminatio nn 0 2 from Refe rUsing the HWmr 1.54 2.25 1.99 6.20 7.23 1.80 2.54 2.39 1.237 3.552 2.154 1.455 2.938 5.9/240 7.241 5.341 4.843 7.8/244 5.4Dose BConce(mr2.3Water Reacto rPlant rence 5 (T SHighest ActiWTB Ground wrem/yr F9E-07 21E-05 92E-13 28E-06 6E-04 83E-05 59E-02 40E-06 28E-06 52E-02 59E-09 47E-11 93E-17 98E-05 29E-04 3E-05 87E-04 84E-05 40E-08 Based on entrations InsCo%rem/yr) 6E+00 r SD RS-TD-3ivity Coreswater Dose Fraction 0.000% 0.035% 0.000% 0.010% 1.147% 0.029% 40.855% 0.004% 0.002% 55.694% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.095% 1.152% 0.084% 0.769% 0.124% 0.000% 2.304% significant ontributor Based on Dose DC0.218% 6-106 313196-001) WTB Drillmrem/yr 7.14E-12 6.28E-11 2.74E-11 1.85E-10 1.28E-02 3.11E-09 1.83E-05 3.51E-05 1.61E-10 2.42E-01 3.32E-04 2.37E-04 5.83E-06 1.24E-07 1.29E-07 2.98E-07 2.39E-06 2.17E-06 1.58E-06 Dose Based on Concentrations (mrem/yr) 9.52E+00 - Insignificling Spoils Dose Fraction 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 5.002% 0.000% 0.007% 0.014% 0.000% 94.749%0.130% 0.093% 0.002% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.001% 0.001% 0.001% 0.242% Insignifican tContributo r% Based o nDose 0.092% cant Contri bWTBmrem/y4.95E-01.96E-02.94E-01.37E-02.29E-02.48E-03.60E-05.81E-06.85E-03.92E+05.67E-04.12E-06.90E-01.81E-01.90E-01.30E-08.27E-03.23E-02.46E-0t r n Dose Base dConcentra t (mrem/y1.55E+0butor Dose B Excavation yr DosFract9 0.0008 0.0008 0.0007 0.00001 5.4996 0.00004 0.0094 0.0146 0.00000 94.2363 0.1373 0.0995 0.0025 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0025 0.0015 0.0010.256d on tions InsignifContrib% BaseDosyr) 02 1.587se ion 0% 0% 0% 0% 9% 0% 9% 4% 0% 6% 7% 9% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 1% 1% 6% ficant butor ed on se 7%

LLR La Crosse Boili nLicense Termin Revision 0 Table 2 H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 Insignificant Radionuclide Dose Percent ng Water Reac tation Plant 24 from Refer eBuried Pipe Grou pmrem/yr D1.52E-13 2.68E-14 4.93E-14 6.83E-14 1.45E-07 1.45E-12 2.27E-10 6.52E-10 1.70E-12 2.44E-06 5.12E-09 4.73E-09 6.84E-11 1.46E-11 1.49E-11 1.01E-11 5.62E-11 3.52E-11 2.78E-11 or ence 5 ( TSD R Sp Excavation Dose Fraction 0.000006% 0.000001% 0.000002% 0.000003% 5.588696% 0.000056% 0.008762% 0.025163% 0.000066% 93.988458% 0.197504% 0.182523% 0.002638% 0.000564% 0.000575% 0.000388% 0.002168% 0.001357% 0.001071% 0.414% S-TD-313196-0Buried Pipe Gr omrem/yr D1.51E-12 3.59E-11 0.00E+00 9.23E-13 1.34E-09 1.72E-12 1.55E-08 8.23E-13 6.43E-12 3.42E-08 6.39E-13 3.00E-13 3.17E-15 9.65E-11 1.69E-10 5.95E-11 2.01E-10 2.62E-11 1.57E-13 6-107 001) Buried Pi poup InSitu Dose Fraction 0.002918% 0.069510% 0.000000% 0.001788% 2.592108% 0.003333% 30.046145% 0.001593% 0.012456% 66.198432% 0.001238% 0.000581% 0.000006% 0.186737% 0.327211% 0.115147% 0.389710% 0.050785% 0.000304% 1.163% ping Dose Cont rCirc Water Pipe Emrem/yr D1.13E-13 2.67E-14 3.78E-14 5.24E-14 1.42E-07 1.11E-12 2.14E-10 6.41E-10 1.26E-12 2.40E-06 95.03E-09 4.65E-09 6.75E-11 1.12E-11 1.14E-11 8.31E-12 4.62E-11 3.38E-11 2.66E-11 ribution per RExcavation Dose Fraction 0.000004% 0.000001% 0.000001% 0.000002% 5.580068% 0.000044% 0.008401% 0.025160% 0.000049%

93.998448% 0.197405% 0.182371% 0.002648% 0.000440% 0.000449% 0.000326% 0.001813% 0.001324% 0.001043% 0.413% ROC per Scena rCirc Water Pipmrem/yr D4.53E-12 4.28E-11 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.48E-10 4.07E-13 1.31E-08 68.18E-13 2.06E-11 6.70E-09 36.45E-16 5.72E-18 9.61E-24 1.39E-11 1.69E-10 2.77E-11 9.53E-11 2.57E-11 1.58E-13 rio pe InSitu Dose Fraction 0.022182% 0.209552% 0.000000% 0.000000% 1.215574% 0.001991%

64.004473% 0.004008% 0.101008%

32.818795% 0.000003% 0.000000% 0.000000% 0.067971% 0.825476% 0.135521% 0.466862% 0.125811% 0.000774% 1.961%