05000335/FIN-2012004-03
From kanterella
Revision as of 10:45, 30 May 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Licensee-Identified Violation |
| Description | 10 CFR 20.1501(a)(2) requires licensees to make or cause to be made surveys that are reasonable under the circumstances to evaluate the magnitude and extent of radiation levels, concentrations or quantities of radioactive material, and the potential radiological hazards. Furthermore, 10 CFR 20.1003 defines a survey as an evaluation of the radiological conditions and potential hazards incident to the presence of radioactive material. Contrary to the above, on August 12, 2012, the licensee performed Tri-Nuc filter (vacuum) maintenance activities in the Unit 2 containment lower cavity without an adequate evaluation of the potential for the contamination to disperse and impact workers performing maintenance activities in the upper cavity area and containment. Specifically, the workers within the lower cavity who were supplied with bubble hood respiratory protective equipment disturbed elevated levels of alpha contamination within the lower cavity while moving their tangled respirator lines. Dispersion of these contaminants to the upper cavity area and containment was exacerbated by operation of the containment coolers and purge exhaust. The dispersed contamination resulted in unanticipated elevated airborne concentrations of radionuclides in the upper cavity and containment with subsequent intakes by workers involved with polar crane operation and upper cavity reactor head maintenance activities. The elevated airborne levels were discovered approximately one hour after the start of the lower cavity work through the evaluation of routine air samples collected for the work in the upper cavity. Immediate corrective actions taken upon discovery included evacuation of the Unit 2 containment and whole-body counting of all potentially impacted workers. The whole-body count evaluations identified eight workers with potential intakes of radioactive materials. Detailed analyses of whole-body count data and air sample results to identify hard-todetect radionuclides (alpha-emitters) for the affected workers resulted in a maximum assigned committed effective dose equivalent (CEDE) of 24.4 millirem (mrem) to one individual. For the other seven individuals identified with positive intakes, licensee estimates of dose (CEDE) were less than 10 mrem. An apparent cause evaluation performed by the licensee determined the causes to be inadequate work practices and planning. The corrective actions were documented under AR 01793148. The violation was evaluated using the Occupational Radiation Safety Significance Determination Process and was determined to be of very low safety significance (Green) because this finding was not an over-exposure, did not have a substantial potential for over-exposure because of continuous air monitors (CAMs) that would have alarmed with increasing airborne levels, and the ability of the licensee to assess dose was not compromised. |
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000335/2012004 Section 4OA7 |
| Date counted | Sep 30, 2012 (2012Q3) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Or Safety |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | T Su G Kuzo S Walker R Reyes L Lake T Hoeg R Carrion D Rich R Patterson B Collins A Vargas J Rivera W Pursley |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |
Finding - Saint Lucie - IR 05000335/2012004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Saint Lucie) @ 2012Q3
Self-Identified List (Saint Lucie)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||