ML17201Q516
| ML17201Q516 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 05/23/2017 |
| From: | Seymour J L Operations Branch III |
| To: | Point Beach |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16319A342 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17201Q516 (1) | |
Text
ES-201Examination Outline Qualitv GhecklistForm ES-201-2Facility:Date of Examination:ItemTask Descriptionlnitialsab*c#1.RITTENa. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.-øf\rb. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance withSection D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.4T\-?c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.ø/fr?d. Assess whether the iustifications for deselected or reiected l(A statements are appropriate.øTu?2.SIMULAToRa. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number ofnormal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and majortranslents.tr/f1-rb. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number andmix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedulewithout compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using atleast one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from theapplicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.4TLrc. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative andquantitative criteria specifled on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.4rw*3.WALKTHRoUGHa. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributedamong the safety functions as specified on the form(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants'audit test(s)(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria onthe form.tr\Ib. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specifed on Form ES-301-1 :(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations#/P?c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix ofapplicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.â/TLI4.GENERALa. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in theappropriate exam sections.ú/fL?b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41143 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate./TÇ?c. Ensure that l(A importance ratinqs (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.4Tl-?d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections..á/'rL?e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.,a)il1l-If. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate iob level (RO or;SRO). / ,/â/ILra. Authorb. Facility Reviewer (*)c. NRC Chief Examinerd. NRC SupervisorDatetl/nt'tnitqí i'z)lr<lz# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.* Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.Note: