ML20210A831

Advises That Diablo Canyon Reverification Program Review Group Has Been Formed of Listed Individuals.Preliminary Findings,Including Cloud & Teledyne Failure of Independence Criteria,Encl.Meeting W/Util Scheduled

ML20210A831
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	12/28/1981
From:	Vollmer R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML16340C148	List: ML16340C147 ML20209B134 ML20209B144 ML20209B172 ML20209B176 ML20209B206 ML20209B218 ML20209B249 ML20209B270 ML20209B277 ML20209B283 ML20209B298 ML20209B443 ML20209B450 ML20209B492 ML20209B597 ML20209B601 ML20209B605 ML20209B682 ML20209B777 ML20209C156 ML20209C239 ML20209C268 ML20209C274 ML20209C285 ML20209C293 ML20209C318 ML20209C326 ML20209C333 ML20209C442 ML20209C446 ML20209C477 ML20209C533 ML20209C551 ML20209C621 ML20210A699 ML20210A793 ML20210A831 ML20210A898 ML20210A977 ML20210B079 ML20210B125 ML20210B142 ML20210B176 ML20210B198 ML20210B218 ML20210B230 ML20210B246 ML20210B256 ML20210B260 ... further results
References
FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8609170355
Download: ML20210A831 (2)

Text

-

e.

[a Rf C

+

^

/

o UNITED STATES g

3 yg cdf p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r,,,g.bg j, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 December 28, 1981

+

MEMORANDUM FOR: Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:

Richard H. Vollmer, Director Division of Engineering

SUBJECT:

DIABLO CANYON REVERIFICATION PROGRAM At your request, we formed a ilehiew Group to perform an in-depth rehlew cf the document action to.date concerning the Diablo Canyon design reverification program. Our review has focussed on the technical adequacy and scope of the proposed design reverification, the. competence of those selected by PG&E to.

perform the design-reverification, and the independence of the parties involved.

The Review Group, with rayself as Chairman, is composed of:

G. Bagchi, Section Leader, EQB R. Bosnak, Chief, NEB W. Haass, Chief, QAB F. Schauer, Chief, SEB S.Skjei, Chief,AEAB E. Sullivan, Technical Assistant, DE.

We had planned on prohiding you.with' a summary report of our rehiew on Dccember 30.

However, our plans to discuss many open items with PG&E and consultants on Decem-ber 28 or 29 were interrupted by the peer team work taking place during the same time period. We, therefore, plan on meeting with PG&E and consultants early in the week of January 4 and providing you with'our report one day later.

Our prelimin~ary findings, discussed in more detail in the enclosuras, are as follows:

Both Cloud and Teledyne fail NRR's proposed indepe:tdence criter.f a.

Thereisinsufficienttechnicalcapabilityincihil-structural analysis shown for either Cloud or Teledyne.

Reedy'sr independence and technical qualifications appear acceptable. However, his reporting relationship through Cloud to PGLE is not.

Theprogramplanfor.reherification.isnotadequatelydeheloped to give assurance that.its successful completion will demonstrate an acceptable facility.

8609170355 860908 lp PDH FOIA HOLMES06-151 PDR

'4. Denton it The sampling plan. selection criteria, and resolation of deficiencies are not acceptable.

l It is not clear.how technical judgements will be made or " benchmarked" against acceptable criteria.

These items will form the agenda for a meeting.with.PGLE and ccnsultants. By separate memorandum to DOL, I will forward an agenda and request a meeting on January 4 or 5, 1982.

. l

~

Richard H. Vollmer. Director Division ci. Engineering

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

E. Case D. Eisenhut R. Mattson R. Tedesco J. Knight W..Johnston Review Group r

a 9

O e

t

+

?

.