ML061010646

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:55, 15 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

E-mail: Fwd: Telecon Discussion on Apdx. B (PA)
ML061010646
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 03/17/2006
From: Ashley D
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
To: Hufnagel J
Exelon Corp
References
%dam200606, TAC MC7624
Download: ML061010646 (2)


Text

[D. Ash, ley - telecon discussion on apdx _13.

Page 1 Lb_ 5.

Isle, teeo dicsinnp Pag 1.

From:

D. Ashley To:

John Hufnagel Date:

03/17/2006 8:26:47 AM

Subject:

telecon discussion on apdx B.

John-Per our phone conversation. See below. We can discuss next week about telecon.

We have reviewed OC submittals dated November 11 and December 8, 2005. In these submittals the applicant takes exceptions to corrective action, confirmation process, and administrative controls AMP elements in NUREG-1801 for the Met tower underground fuel piping and the SBO mechanical equipment.

The applicant states that these three AMP elements are not in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 50. However, the applicant states that these three elements meet the guidance in Branch Technical Position IQMB-1. The EQV staff finds that the applicant is not meeting the guidance in IQMB-1 in the following areas.

IOMB-1 states that the confirmation process should be described and that the effectiveness of prevention and mitigation programs should be verified periodically. The submittals do not address prevention and mitigation programs.

IQMB-1 states that the administrative controls of the program should be described. The submittals do not describe the administrative controls. Example of administrative controls include use of procedures, documentation of corrective action, and maintenance of records.

EQV also finds that the LRA revisions in the submittals are incomplete. Sections A.0.5 and B.0.3 state that the corrective action, confirmation process, and administrative controls meet the requirements of Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 50. The descriptions in Sections A.0.5 and B.0.3 are not consistent with the corrective action, confirmation process, and administrative controls descriptions in Section B.1 of the L.RA which states that corrective action, confirmation process, and administrative controls do not meet the requirements of Appendix B of 10 CFR Part 50.

The submittals describes a program that has not yet been developed. A commitment should be added to Table A.5 of the LRA that states that the new program will be implemented prior operating on an extended license.

EQV would like to discuss these issues with the applicant.

regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301 -41 5 31 91 djal @nrm.gov CC:

Steve Tingen

I c:\\te~rp\\GW)00001.TI/IP Page 1;,

I c:\\terp\\GW}OOOO1.TMP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (441AB917.842: 9: 10848)

Subject:

Creation Date:

From:

Created By:

telecon discussion on apdx B.

03/17/2006 8:26:47 AM D. Ashley DJAl @nrc.gov Recipients exeloncorp.com 8:27:13; AM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)

Action Transferred Date & Time 17 March, 2006 nrc.gov TWG WPOO2.HQGWDOO1 8:26:55 AM SGT CC (Steve Tingen) 8:27:04 AM Post Office TWGWVPO02.HQGWDOO1 Delivered Opened Delivered 17 March, 2006 17 March, 2006 Route exeloncorp.com 17 March, 2006 8:26:55 AM nrc.gov Files MESS AGE D. Ashley.vcf Options Auto Delete:

Expiration Date:

Notify Recipients:

Priority:

Reply Requested:

Return Notification:

Concealed

Subject:

Security:

To Be Delivered:

Status Tracking:

Size 3537 232 Date & Time 17 March, 2006 8:26:47 AM 17 March, 2006 8:26:47 AM No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate Delivered & Opened