ML100610134

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:22, 14 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review Relief Request No. 47
ML100610134
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/2010
From: Randy Hall
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Stroud R
Arizona Public Service Co
Hall, J R, NRR/DORL/LPL4, 301-415-4032
References
TAC ME3052
Download: ML100610134 (2)


Text

From:

Hall, Randy Sent:

Tuesday, March 02, 2010 8:24 AM To:

Russell.Stroud@aps.com

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Palo Verde Unit 3, Relief Request No. 47, TAC No.

ME3052 March 2, 2010 Russell A. (Rusty) Stroud Licensing Section Leader Regulatory Affairs Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Arizona Public Service Company Rusty:

By letter dated December 21, 2009, Arizona Public Service Company (APS) submitted a request for relief from the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,Section XI, for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS), Unit 3.

The proposed relief request, RR No. 47, would provide relief from those requirements for the Unit 3 second 10-Year inservice inspection interval that APS has determined to be impractical.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.55a of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an alternative to the requirements of that section or portion thereof may be used when authorized by the NRC. The applicant shall demonstrate that: 1) the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or 2) compliance with the specified requirements of this section would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality and safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and to make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032.

Randy Hall, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC (301) 415-4032 Randy.Hall@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance Review for Palo Verde Unit 3, Relief Request No. 47, TAC No.

ME3052 Sent Date: 3/2/2010 8:19:56 AM Received Date: 3/2/2010 8:23:00 AM From: Hall, Randy Created By: Randy.Hall@nrc.gov Recipients:

Russell.Stroud@aps.com (Russell.Stroud@aps.com)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 10757 3/2/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: