ML17156A828

Information Request to Support Upcoming Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection at Clinton Power Station

ML17156A828
Person / Time
Site:	Clinton
Issue date:	06/05/2017
From:	Karla Stoedter NRC/RGN-III/DRP/B1
To:	Bryan Hanson Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
References
Download: ML17156A828 (8)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE RD. SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 June 5, 2017 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior VP, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and CNO, Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT CLINTON POWER STATION

Dear Mr. Hanson:

This letter is to request information to support our scheduled Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection beginning September 11, 2017, at the Clinton Power Station.

This inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedure 71152.

Experience has shown that these inspections are extremely resource intensive both for the NRC inspectors and the utility staff. In order to minimize the impact that the inspection has on the site and to ensure a productive inspection, we have enclosed a list of documents required for the inspection.

The documents requested are copies of condition reports and lists of information necessary to ensure the inspection team is adequately prepared for the inspection. The information requested prior to the inspection may be provided in either CD-ROM/DVD (preferred) or hard copy format and should be ready for NRC review by August 21, 2017. Ms. Elba Sanchez Santiago, the Lead Inspector, will contact your staff to determine the best method of providing the requested information.

If there are any questions about the material requested or the inspection in general, please contact Ms. Sanchez Santiago at 440-259-3610 or Elba.SanchezSantiago@nrc.gov. After August 19, 2017, Ms. Sanchez Santiago can be reached at 217-935-9521.

This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, Control Number 3150-0011.

The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number.

This letter and its enclosure will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Karla Stoedter, Chief Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-461 License No. NPF-62

Enclosure:

Requested Information to Support PI&R Inspection cc: Distribution via LISTSERV

Letter to Bryan C. Hanson from Karla Stoedter dated June 5, 2017

SUBJECT:

INFORMATION REQUEST TO SUPPORT UPCOMING PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION AT CLINTON POWER STATION DISTRIBUTION:

Jeremy Bowen RidsNrrDorlLpl3 RidsNrrPMClinton Resource RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource Cynthia Pederson Darrell Roberts Richard Skokowski Allan Barker Carole Ariano Linda Linn DRSIII DRPIII ROPreports.Resource@nrc.gov ADAMS Accession Number: ML17156A828 OFFICE RIII RIII NAME KStoedter for ESanchezSantiago:tt KStoedter DATE 6/05/2017 6/05/2017 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Enclosure Requested Information to Support Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Please provide the information on a compact disc (one for each of four team members),

if possible. Unless otherwise specified, the time frame for requested information is for the period of September 11, 2015, through the time the data request is answered. Please label any electronic files with file content information. In the case of list of condition reports requested, the list should be sortable electronically.

In addition, inspectors will require computer access to the corrective action program (CAP) database while on site.

PROGRAM DOCUMENTS

1.

Copies of current administrative procedures associated with the corrective action program. This should include procedures related to: (1) corrective action process (including procedures on how to perform root and apparent cause evaluations);

(2) operating experience program; (3) self-assessment program; (4) maintenance rule program; (5) operability determination process; (6) degraded/non-conforming condition process (e.g., RIS 2005-20); (7) system health process or equivalent equipment reliability improvement programs; and (8) operational decision making (ODMI) process.

2.

A current copy of the Employee Concerns Program/Ombudsman Administrative Procedure.

3.

Description of any substantive changes made to the CAP since the last Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) Inspection (September 2015). Please include the effective date with each listed change.

ASSESSMENTS

4.

A copy of Quality Assurance (QA) audits of the corrective action program.

5.

A copy of self-assessments and associated condition reports generated in preparation for this PI&R inspection.

6.

A list of all other QA audits completed.

7.

The schedule of future QA audits.

8.

A copy of completed CAP self-assessments and the plan/schedule for future CAP self-assessments.

9.

A chronological list of department and site self-assessments completed (include date completed).

10. A list of condition reports (CRs) written for findings or concerns identified in self-assessments and audits. Include a short description/title of the finding, its status, and include a cross-reference to the audit or self-assessment number.

2 CORRECTIVE ACTION DOCUMENTS

11. A copy of completed root cause evaluations generated since September 11, 2015.

Provide status of any actions developed as part of the evaluations. Include a reference, if not part of the root cause package, to the documents and/or CRs directing and tracking the actions.

12. A list of completed apparent cause evaluations generated since September 11, 2015.

Provide status of any actions developed as part of the evaluations. Include a reference, if not part of the apparent cause package, to the documents and/or CRs directing and tracking the actions.

13. A list of completed common cause evaluations generated since September 11, 2015.

Provide status of any actions developed as part of the evaluations. Include a reference, if not part of the common cause package, to the documents and/or CRs directing and tracking the actions.

14. A list of all open condition reports sorted by significance level. Include CR number, the date initiated, a brief description/title, system affected if any, significance level, and anticipated completion date, if available.

15. A list of closed CRs sorted by significance level and then initiation date. Include CR number, a brief description/title, the date initiated and closed, assigned organization, system affected and whether there was an associated operability evaluation.

16. A list of open corrective actions, sorted by significance/priority level, with a brief description/title, initiating date and due date. The list should include the number of due date extensions and be grouped by the responsible department.

17. A list of CRs generated by the corporate office that involve or affect plant operation, sorted by significance level. Include the date initiated, a brief description/title, site(s) affected, system affected, assigned organization, and status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

18. A list of completed effectiveness reviews with a brief description of the results. Include a cross-reference to the CRs for which the effectiveness review was conducted and, if applicable, CR numbers documenting any additional follow-up actions.

19. A list of CRs initiated for inadequate or ineffective corrective actions. Include the date initiated, a brief description/title, significance/priority level, system affected, assigned organization, and status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed). Include a cross-reference to the CR or evaluation that generated the original corrective action.

20. A copy of any performance reports or indicators used to track CAP effectiveness.

The end-of-quarter data will suffice; monthly reports are not required.

21. A data table (or similar format) showing the total number of CRs generated per year since 2012 sortable by department (i.e. operations, engineering, security etc.).

22. A data table showing the number of issues identified externally (NRC, INPO, other etc.)

per year as compared to internally since 2012.

3 TRENDS

23. A list of CRs initiated for trends. Include the date initiated, a brief description/title, significance/priority level, and status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

24. Copies of any completed trend reports for CRs. Quarterly trend reports are acceptable; copies of all monthly reports are not required.

25. Copies of all apparent, common and/or root cause evaluations regarding adverse human performance trends.

OPERATING EXPERIENCE

26. A copy of the most recent operating experience program effectiveness review.

27. A list of CRs initiated to evaluate industry and NRC operating experience, and NRC generic communications (e.g. bulletins, information notices, generic letters, etc.).

Include date the CR was initiated, a brief description/title, and the status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS

28. A list of the top ten risk significant systems and top ten risk significant components.

29. A list of operability determinations/evaluations that were opened and evaluated since September 11, 2015. Include a brief description/title, date initiated, date closed or date scheduled to be closed. Also include any open operability evaluations that were initiated prior to September 11, 2015.

30. Cause analysis, corrective actions documents, health reports, and trend analysis for systems and components considered Maintenance Rule (a)(1). Provide this information starting one year earlier from when the system or component entered (a)(1) status. Include dates when system/components entered (a)(1) status and, if applicable, returned to (a)(2) status. For recurring reports, quarterly reports are sufficient; monthly reports are not required.

31. A list of temporary modifications that were installed since September 11, 2015, with a brief description/title, installation date, and current status. Include any in-place temporary modifications that were installed prior to September 11, 2015.

SCWE

32. Results of completed safety culture/safety conscious work environment surveys or self-assessments. Include reference to associated CRs and status of the CRs actions.

Also include schedule/plans for future surveys.

4 REGULATORY ISSUES

33. A copy of CRs for issues (findings, violations, etc.) documented in NRC inspection reports. Include the CR number, brief description/title, date initiated and the status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

34. A list of CRs for licensee identified violations that have been documented in NRC inspection reports. Include the CR number, brief description/title, date initiated and the status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

35. A list of CRs associated with NRC identified issues. Include the CR number, brief description/title, date initiated and the status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

36. A list of degraded/non-conforming conditions. Include the CR number, brief description/title, date initiated and date closed or projected closeout date. Include open issues that were identified prior to September 11, 2015.

37. A list of current control room deficiencies and operator work-arounds, sortable by priority, with a brief description/title and corresponding CR and/or work order (WO) number.

5-YEAR REVIEW

38. A list of CRs and WOs regarding the reactor core isolation cooling system that have been generated since September 11, 2012. Include the CR number, brief description/title, level of evaluation (i.e. root cause, apparent cause, common cause etc.), date initiated, and the status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

39. A list of CRs and WOs regarding the switchgear ventilation system that have been generated since September 11, 2012. Include the CR/WO number, brief description/title, level of evaluation (i.e. root cause, apparent cause, common cause, etc.), date initiated, and the status (if closed include date closed; if open, include scheduled date to be closed).

ADMIN

40. A copy of the latest plant organizational chart and phone listing.

41. Scheduled dates, times, and location for all meetings associated with implementing the CAP (e.g. CR screening meetings, corrective action review board meetings). Include work order screening/assessment meetings.

Documents Requested to be Available On-Site during the Inspection:

a. Updated Safety Analysis Report.

b. Technical Specifications.

c. Procedures and procedure index.

5

d. A copy of the QA manual.

e. A list of issues brought to the ECP/Ombudsman and the actions taken for resolution.

f.

A list of the codes used in the CAP.

g. A copy of the latest independent/offsite organization review of safety culture/safety conscious work environment and internal equivalent assessments if not provided as part of the requested data package.

Other:

On the first day of the inspection, or early on the second day, please provide the inspection team a briefing of your corrective action program. Include your expectations for personnel using the program and how the work order system fits into the overall scheme for addressing identified issues. Also please demonstrate how to use a computer to access CAP data.