IR 05000311/1978034
| ML18078A370 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1978 |
| From: | Nicholas H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078A369 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-78-34, NUDOCS 7811100164 | |
| Download: ML18078A370 (7) | |
Text
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT Region I Report N /78-34 Docket No. _..... 5....,0-'-3....,1...,.l.__ __
License N CPPR-53
""":....:....:..:....==---
Priority -------
Category _ __.....B_,_l ____ _
- Licensee:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Pl ace Newark, New Jersey 07101 Facility Name:
Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2 Inspection at:
Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey Inspection conducted:
Seite~er 20-22, 1978 Inspectors: 1J.. k~-k'~
H. Nicholas, Reactor Inspector Approved by:
Inspection Summary:
date signed date signed r/z96r
'date signed Inspection on September 20-22, 1978 (Report No. 50-311/78-34)
.
Areas Inspected:* Routine, unannounced inspection by a regional based inspector of the integrated hot functional test program status; preoperational test procedures for review, verification and witnessing; followup on previous unresolved and open items; and plant tour of the control room, turbine building, auxiliary building, relay room and containmen The inspection involved 26 *
inspector-hours onsite by one NRC regional oased inspecto Results:
No items of noncompliance were identified *
Region I Form 1 2 (Rev. April 77)
'18111001~1
DETAILS Persons Contacted Public Service Electric and Gas Company
- Mr. S. Chawaga, Principal Staff Engineer, QAD
- Mr. F. Diaferio, Jr., QC Test & Startup Group Head
- Mr. R. Griffith, Sr., Senior Staff Engineer, QA Mr. C. Johnson, Startup Engineer
- Mr. H. Lowe, Site QA Engineer
- Mr. A. Meyer, Site QA Engineer
- Mr. E. Meyer, Project QA Head
- Mr. P. String, QA/QC Coordinator
- Mr. 0. Tauber, Site QA Engineer United Engineers and Constructors, In Mr. N. Bender, Lead Test Engineer Mr. S. Page, Lead Test Engineer
- Mr. D. Snyder, Project Engineer
- Mr. E. Walsh, Asst. Supt. Field QC USN RC
- Mr. D. Beckman, Reactor Inspector
- Mr. R. Markowski, Reactor !nspector
- Mr. G. Napuda, Reactor Insi:ector
- Mr. L. Norrholm, Resident Reactor Inspector
- denotes those present at the exit intervie.
Preoperational Test Procedure~ Preoperational Test Procedure Review The following procedures were reviewed for technical and admin-istrative adequac SUP 8, Revision 0, Approved September 18, 197 Pressurizer Relief Tan SUP 10.2, Revision 0, Approved September 13, 197 Boric Acid System.
SUP 31.28, Revision 0, Approved September 13, 197 Emergency Power System Operational Test - Initial 2B Diesel Generator Operational Testin SUP 31.2C, Revision 0, Approved September 13, 197 Emergency Power System Operational Test - Initial 2C Diesel Generator Operational Testin SUP 19.l, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Auxiliary Building Ventilatio SUP 19.2, Revision 0, Approved September 18, 197 Containment Iodine Remova SUP 19.3, Revision 0, Approved September 18, 197 Rod Drive Ventilation Syste SUP 42, Revision 0, Approved September 11, 197 Functional Test of Hydrogen Recombiners and Combustible Gas Detector Equipmen Each procedure was reviewed for the following:
Management approval, Appropriate committee review, Procedure format, Test objectives, Prerequisites, Environmental conditions, Acceptance criteria, References,
Initial conditions, Test objectives are met, Performance verification, Recording conduct of test, Restoration of system to normal after test, Evaluation of test data, and Quality control verificatio Findings:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements, guidance and licensee commitment No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedure * **
Preoperational Test Procedure Verification The following procedures were reviewed to verify that adequate testing is planned to satisfy regulatory guidance and licensee commitments:
SUP 8, Revision 0, Approved September 18, 197 Pressurizer Relief Tan SUP 10.2, Revision 0, Approved September 13, 197 Boric Acid Syste SUP 31.28, Revision 0, Approved September 13, 197 Emergency Power System Operational Test - Initial 28 Diesel Generator Operational Testin SUP 31.2C, Revision 0, Approved September 13, 197 Emergency Power System Operational Test - Initial 2C Diesel Generator Operational Testing.
SUP 19.l, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Auxiliary Building Ventilatio SUP 19.2, Revision 0, Approved September 18, 197 Containment Iodine Remova SUP 19.3, Revision 0, Approved September 18, 197 Rod Drive Ventilation Syste SUP 42, Revision 0, Approved September 11, 197 Functional Test of Hydrogen Recombiners and Combustible Gas Detector Equipmen The inspector verified that the licensee had a procedure written, reviewed, and approve Management approval was in accordance with established licensee procedures and test objectives were consistent with test title Findings:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of these procedures and the inspector had no further questions at this tim *
5 Preoperational Test Results Evaluation The following procedure was reviewed to ascertain whether uniform criteria are being applied for evaluating completed preoperational tests to assure their technical and administrative adequacy:
DTP-98-H-l, Revision 0, Approved June 2, 197 Reactor Coolant System Cold Hydrostatic Tes Results Reviewed and Approved July 5, 197 The inspector reviewed the tests results, and verification of licensee evaluation of tests results, by the following methods:
Review of all test changes, Review of all test deficiencies, Review of test surrrrnary and evaluation, Review of "As-run 11 copy of test procedure, Review of QA inspection records, and Verifying that the test results have been approve Findings:
No discrepancies were noted in the review of this procedure and the inspector had no further questions at this tim.
Integrated Hot Furtctional Test Program Hot Functional Test Status The primary objective of this inspection was to review and observe preparations for the Integrated Hot Functional Tes The inspector received and reviewed procedures and discussed the following areas with the Startup Engineer:
Preparations for the integrated hot functional test, Procedure status and approval, Prerequisites and references, Procedure verification and results review, and Test witnessin HFT Procedure Review (1)
The inspector reviewed the following draft copies of procedures in support of Hot Functional Testing:
SUP 50.05, Solid System Pressure Control SUP 50.17, Safety Injection System Check Valves Leakage Tes Findings:
As this was a preliminary review of draft copies of these procedures, a detailed review will be made of the approved procedures on subsequent insp~ction Th~ inspector had no further questions at this tim (2)
The following approved procedures were reviewed for technical and administrative adequacy:
SUP 50.01, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Reactor Coolant System Thermal Expansio SUP 50.02, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Reactor Coolant System Leakage Test - Ho SUP 50.03, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Pressurizer Power Operated Relief Valve Tes SUP 50.04, Revision 0, Approved September 19, 197 Incore Thermocouple RTD Cross Calibratio SUP 50. 9A, Revision 0, Approved September 11, 197 Atrnospheri c Steam Dump Control - Ho *
Each procedure was reviewed for the following:
Management approval,
Appropriate corrunitttee review, Procedure format, Test objectives, Prerequisites, Environmental conditions, Acceptance criteria, References, Initial conditions, Test objectives are met, Performance verification, Recording conduct of test, Restoration of system to normal after test,
- Evaluation of test data, and Quality control verificatio.3
'
>
..
Findings:
The inspector ascertained by review of the above procedures that they are consistent with regulatory requirements,
- guidance and licensee comnitnent No discrepancies were
- noted in the review of these procedure.
Pl ant Tour The inspector made a tour of the control room, turbine building, auxiliary building, relay room and containmen The inspector observed work activities in all areas and preparations being made
.for the integrated hot functional tes No inadequacies were identifie.
Exit Interview At the conclusion of the site inspection on September 22, 1978, an exit meeting was conducted with the licensee's senior site repre-*
sentatives (denoted in paragraph 1). The findings were identified and previous unresolved items were discussed.