IR 05000311/1979005
| ML18078B006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 01/25/1979 |
| From: | Ebneter S, Gage L, Koltay P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18078B005 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-311-79-05, 50-311-79-5, NUDOCS 7903140303 | |
| Download: ML18078B006 (5) | |
Text
Report N Docket N U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 50-311/79-05 50-311
Region I License N CPPR-53 Priority ------
Category _;,,_.....:B::...:l~----
Licensee:
Facility Name:
Inspection at:
Approved by:
Public Service Electric and Gas Company
- 80 Park Place Newark, New Jersey* 07101 Salem 2 Hancocks Bri.dge, New Jersey S. Ebneter, Chief, Engineering Support Section, RC&ES Branch
Inspection Summary:
Ins ection on Januar 8-10, 1979 Re art No. 50-311 79-05 Ida te *signed 1/Jf /79
- Tcia te signed date signed Areas Inspected:
Routine, unannounce inspection of the fire prevention/protection pr.ogram including work-control procedures, quality-control survei 11 ance, design-change controls, fire training and dri 11 s,.emergency shutdown procedures, fire
.. inspection reports, and faci 1 ity inspectio The inspection involved 38 inspector-hours onsite by two NRC regional based inspector Results:
No items of noncomplianc.e were identifie Region I Form 12 (Rev. April 77)
7903140 363
DETAILS Persons Contacted Public Service Electric and Gas Company
- Mr. S. Chawaga, Project Quality Control Engineer
.*.***Mr.* J. Destefano, Site Quality Assurance Engineer
- * Mr. R. Griffith, Sr. Staff Engineer, QA
.
.
.
- Mr. E. Meyer, Project Quality Assurance Engineer - Salem *
Mr. w. Rieber, Fire Protection Sponsor Engineer
- Mr. R. Scaletti, Safety Supervisor United Engineers and Constructors, In * Mr. D. Snyder, Project Engineer U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- Mr. L. Norrholm, Resident Inspector.
- de.notes those attending exit intervie.
Work Control Procedures The licensee stated that the "Fire Fighting and Organization Manual, Salem Generating Station," which was written for Salem l, would also be applicable to Salem The inspector r~viewed Revision l of the manua Paragraph 3.9 requires the issuance of a work-order stamp titled 11Hot *work Authorized' II to control welding and cutting during maintenance and modification activities. It a*lso establishes the use of a fire watch during these a*ctivitie No items of noncompliance were identifie.
Quality Assurance Review The inspector reviewed the draft of procedure QAI 2-13 (Revision O),
titled 11QA Program for Fire Protection.
This procedure, when issued with responsfble departments identified, is. intended to de,scribe the operational quality assurance program for fire protection for the plan *
No items of noncompliance were identifie.
Design-Change Controls The inspector verified that the licensee's Specification No. 771304, (Revision O), dated March l, 1978, specifies the. use of foamed-in-pl ace,flexible silicone rubber foam a-s ~thei penetratiCfrf seaTant--for- ~----*-- -**-:
. ielectri c-al -ca bl es --th.rough*-aes i gned ***fire-oarr'fer *
.
-
... * The *i'nstallat.ion of the penetration seals is being done by Insulation
.* Consul tan ts and Management Service, Inc. ( lCMS).
The inspector ex-amined the Quality Assurance Manual of ICMS, QA-002, (undated). It includes Quality Control Procedures and Production Work Instructions, which appeared to be in accordance with the licensee's Specification No. 77130 No items of noncompliance were identifie.
Fire Brigade Training and Drills The licensee stated that a single fire brigade would be used to pro-tect Salem l and 2 when Salem 2 becomes o*perationa The inspector noted that the Salem l fire brigade drills and training were reviewed during the past 12 months (Reference:
IE Report No. 50-272/78-12),
and no items of noncompliance were identifie.
Emergency Shutdown Procedures The inspector verified that there were plant emergency procedures that. provided alternate methods for accomplishing an orderly plant shutdown and cooldown in case of loss of normal coolant supply system The procedures, covering Salem l and Salem 2, include the fo 11 owing Emergency Instructions:
N Title Rev. N Date 4~4
"Loss of Coolant"
12/6/78 "Loss of Reactor Coolant Pump
3/7/78 and/or Flow" 4. 12
"Loss of Feedwater" l
4/24/78 4.14
"Service Water System Malfunction "
4/24/78
N Title Rev. N Date 4.17
"Partial Loss of Reactor Coolant"
4/24/78 4.22
. "Loss of Residual Heat Removal
4/25/78 Shutdown Cooling"
.*No items of nOncompliance were identifie.
Fire Inspection Report The inspector reviewed the most recent insurance fire inspection re-port,. titled "Property Loss Prevention Report," dated June 29 and 30, 197 The inspection was conducted by M and M Protection Consultants for Nuclear Mutual Limite The report did not contain any recommenda-tions for cha.nges/improvements to safety-related area No iteqis of noncompliance were identifie Facility Inspection The inspector examined the fire alarming and extinguishing equipment in the control room, switchgear (cable spreading) room, containment building, reactor fuel handling building, auxiliary building, turbine generator hall, battery rooms, and diesel-generator room He al so examined the outside equipment, including fire hydrants, service water intake structures, and fire pump hous During his inspecti.on of the service water intake structure, the in-spe~tor noted that the inspection tags on the portable fire exting-uishers at station numbers 70 and 71 did not indicate that a
December 1978 inspection had been mad (The most recent inspection was November 15, 1978). This is contrary to the licensee's "Construc-tion Fire Protection Manual" {Revision 0), Section IV-C, titled 11Procedure for Checking Portable Fire Extinguishers," which states:
"... a monthly inspection..* shall be made on each extfoguisher..** "
..........Ji****-..,;...
.5 Following the completion of the inspection on January 11, 1979, the license*e (Mr. R. Scaletti) called the NRC IE:I offic He informed the inspector that plant records showed that the fire extinguishers in question were inspected by the licensee in December, 1978; they had. n_eglected to indicate the inspection on the attached tag This is considered to be an unresolved i-tem *. The licensee's records
- will be examined by ari NRC inspector during a subsequent inspection to determine if fire extinguishers are be.ing inspected on a monthly basis ' __ (7"9=n~:]_f)~--=--*
- Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required in order to ascertain whether tbey are acceptable items, items of noncompliance or devi atioris *' '1\\n' unres-oi v'ed item -dis-closed during the' --
inspection*:. is:discussed in pa-ragraph-a.*---*--*----**-------------
~--
- -.-----'
.
1 Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph l) at the conclusion of the inspection on January 10, 197 The in-spector summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection and the finding The licensee acknowledged the inspector's finding I