Regulatory Guide 1.78
| ML013100014 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/31/2001 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research |
| To: | |
| Basu S (301)415-6774 | |
| References | |
| DG-1087 RG-1.78 Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML013100014 (17) | |
Regulatory guides are issued to describe and make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of theNRC's regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the NRC staff in its review of applicationsfor permits and license Regulatory guides are not substitutes for regulations, and compliance with them is not require Methods and solutions different from those setout in the guides will be acceptable if they provide a basis for the findings requisite to the issuance or continuance of a permit or license by the Commission.This guide was issued after consideration of comments received from the publi Comments and suggestions for improvements in these guides are encouraged at all times,and guides will be revised, as appropriate, to accommodate comments and to reflect new information or experienc Written comments may be submitted to the Rulesand Directives Branch, ADM, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-000 Regulatory guides are issued in ten broad divisions: 1, Power Reactors; 2, Research and Test Reactors; 3, Fuels and Materials Facilities; 4, Environmental and Siting;5, Materials and Plant Protection; 6, Products; 7, Transportation; 8, Occupational Health; 9, Antitrust and Financial Review; and 10, General. Single copies of regulatory guides (which may be reproduced) may be obtained free of charge by writing the Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by fax to (301)415-2289, or by email to DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GO Electronic copies of this guide, along with other recentlyissued guides, are available on the internet at NRC's home page, <WWW.NRC.GOV>, in the Electronic Reading Roo This guide has accession number ML013100014.U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Revision 1December 2001REGULATORYGUIDE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCHREGULATORY GUIDE 1.78(Draft was issued as DG-1087)EVALUATING THE HABITABILITY OF ANUCLEAR POWER PLANT CONTROL ROOM DURING A POSTULATEDHAZARDOUS CHEMICAL RELEASE INTRODUCTIONCriterion 4, "Environmental and Dynamic Effects Design Bases," of Appendix A, "General DesignCriteria for Nuclear Power Plants," to 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," requires, in part, that structures, systems, and components important to safety be designed to accommodate the effects of and to be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing, and postulated accident Criterion 19, "Control Room," requires that a control room be provided from which actions can be taken to operate the nuclear power unit safely under normal conditions and to maintain it in a safe condition under accident conditions.Releases of hazardous chemicals can result in the control room becoming uninhabitabl Thisregulatory guide describes assumptions acceptable to the NRC staff for use in assessing the habitability of the control room during and after a postulated external release of hazardous chemicals from mobile or stationary sources, offsite or onsit This guide also provides guidance acceptable to the NRC staff for the protection of control room operators against an accidental release of such hazardous chemicals, including chlorin Regulatory Guide 1.95, "Protection of Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Operators Against an Accidental Chlorine Release," provided guidance on storing chlorine onsite, described acceptable design features and procedures for the protection of nuclear power plant control room operators against an accidental onsite chlorine release, and outlined emergency procedures that need to be initiated in the event of a chlorine releas .78-2This Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.78 incorporates and withdraws Regulatory Guide1.95 since many regulatory positions in these two guides are the same or similar. This revision also updates certain regulatory positions based on more current knowledge of the subjec This guide does not consider the explosion hazard of these chemicals, which is addressed separately in Regulatory Guide 1.91, "Evaluations of Explosions Postulated To Occur on Transportation Routes Near Nuclear Power Plants" (Re ), nor does it address flammability hazards, which are addressed separately in Regulatory Guide 1.189, "Fire Protection for Operating Nuclear Power Plants" (Ref. 2). The information collections contained in this regulatory guide are covered by therequirements of 10 CFR Part 50, which were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, approval number 3150-001 If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection. DISCUSSIONThe control room of a nuclear power plant should be appropriately protected fromhazardous chemicals that may be discharged as a result of equipment failures, human errors, or events and conditions outside the control of the nuclear power plan Sources of hazardous chemicals could be mobile or stationary and could include storage tanks, pipelines, fire-fighting equipment, tank trucks, railroad cars, and barges.This guide has been revised to provide guidance on control room habitability during apostulated hazardous chemical release, including chlorin The guide describes assumptions and criteria for screening out release events that need not be considered in the evaluation of control room habitabilit The guide also provides guidance on performing detailed evaluations of control room habitability and on screening criteria, including the distance between the release source and the control room, the frequency of shipments (to calculate release frequency from a mobile source), the quantity and duration of a release, toxicity of released chemicals, meteorological conditions (for dispersion calculations), and the rate of air infiltration into the control roo The guide covers both toxic and asphyxiating chemicals, but recognizes that the asphyxiating chemicals should only be considered if their release results in displacement of a significant fraction of the control room ai The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
provides guidance on what is considered an oxygen-deficient atmosphere.This revision of Regulatory Guide 1.78 updates specifications of toxicity limits based onmore recent data (Regulatory Position 3), brings risk insights into the process, and makes the guidance more performance-base Consistent with risk-informed regulatory decision-making, this revision encourages licensees to make greater use of risk insights in submitting applications for plant-specific changes to the licensing basis, using the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.174 (Ref. 3). At the same time, the revision continues to provide latitude to the licensees for the use of traditional engineering approache Also, consistent with the intent of SECY-00-0191 (Ref. 4) on performance-based initiatives, this revision provides performance-based guidance rather than traditional prescriptive guidanc .78-3The June 1974 version of Regulatory Guide 1.78 specified a 2-minute exposure to givenconcentration limits of certain toxic chemical The 2-minute exposure criterion was based on the time a control room operator is expected to take to don a respirator and protective clothin The concentration limits were based on outdated and often unverifiable reference Further, only a limited number of chemicals have the toxicity limits specified in the 1974 guid The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has published updated toxicity limits for many hazardous chemicals, based on the Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH)
exposure level concept (Ref. 5). The IDLH value or limit, based on a 30-minute exposure level, is defined as one that is likely to cause death or immediate or delayed permanent adverse health effects if no protection is afforded within 30 minute The IDLH exposure limits were developed for respirator selection for a large number of chemicals, including those covered in this regulatory guid The use of IDLH values as toxicity limits is considered appropriate since it provides an adequate margin of safety as long as control room operators use protective measures within 2 minutes after the detection of hazardous chemicals; they therefore would not be subjected to prolonged exposures at the IDLH concentration level Therefore, these limits are included in this revision of Regulatory Guide 1.78.Many of the regulatory positions in the original Regulatory Guides 1.78 and 1.95 are thesame or simila This revision combines these two guides, thereby making the positions applicable to all toxic chemicals, including chlorine, that should be considered in the control room habitability evaluatio Combining the two guides eliminates certain duplication of efforts for licensees in submitting their applications and streamlines the NRC staff review process. REGULATORY POSITIONThe following guidance is provided for evaluating the habitability of a nuclear power plantcontrol room during a postulated hazardous chemical release.1.HAZARD SCREENINGWhether a chemical source (stationary or mobile) constitutes a hazard that requires acontrol room habitability evaluation depends on the quantity of chemical released, the distance from the plant, prevailing meteorological conditions, the inleakage characteristics of the control room, and the applicable toxicity limit Licensees are encouraged to conduct periodic surveys of stationary and mobile sources of hazardous chemicals in the vicinity of their plant sites to keep the site-specific inventories up to dat The following screening criteria identify the release events that need not be considered further for control room habitability evaluation.1.1Screening Criteria for Stationary SourcesChemicals stored or situated at distances greater than 5 miles from the plant need not beconsidered because, if a release occurs at such a distance, atmospheric dispersion will dilute and disperse the incoming plume to such a degree that either toxic limits will never be reached or there would be sufficient time for the control room operators to take appropriate actio In addition, the probability of a plume remaining within a given sector for a long period of time is quite smal For explosive hazards, a lower number of shipments would be considered frequent since the effects of an explosion would beindependent of wind direction.1.78-4If sources of hazardous chemicals such as those listed in Table 1 are known or projected tobe present within a 5-mile radius of the plant, and in quantities less than those shown in the table of examples in Appendix A for a given toxicity limit and stable meteorological conditions, these sources need not be considered in the evaluation of control room habitabilit Appendix A to this guide also contains a simplified procedure for adjusting the quantities given in the table to appropriately account for the toxicity limit of a specific chemical, the meteorological conditions of a particular site, and the air exchange rate of a control roo The calculations in Appendix A are included as examples of the guidance. Any hazardous chemical stored onsite within 0.3 miles of the control room in a quantitygreater than 100 pounds should be considered for control room habitability evaluatio Hazardous chemicals should not be stored within the close proximity (generally within 330 feet or less) of a control room or its fresh air inlets, including ventilation system intakes and locations of possible infiltration such as penetration Small quantities for laboratory use, 20 pounds or less, are exemp The maximum allowable inventory in a single container stored at specified distances beyond 330 feet from the control room or its fresh air inlet varies according to the distance and the control room type. If there are several chemical containers, only the failure of the largest container is normallyconsidered in the evaluation unless the containers are interconnected in such a manner that failure of a single container could cause a release from several containers.1.2Screening Criteria for Mobile SourcesIf hazardous chemicals such as those listed in Table 1 are known or projected to be shippedby rail, water, or road routes outside a 5-mile radius of a nuclear power plant, the shipments need not be considered further for evaluation for the same reason stated in the screening criteria for stationary source If the shipments are within a 5-mile radius of a nuclear power plant, estimates of the frequencies of these shipments should be considered in the evaluation of control room habitabilit Shipments are defined as being frequent1 if there are 10 total shipments per year fortruck traffic, 30 per year for rail traffic, or 50 per year for barge traffi These frequencies are based on transportation accident statistics, conditional spill probability given an accident, and a limiting criterion for the number of spills or release These accident rates have remained relatively constant for many years, therefore it is not necessary to revise these frequencies (Ref. 5). Mobile sources need not be considered further if the total shipment frequency for allhazardous chemicals, i.e., all hazardous chemicals considered as a singular cargo category without further distinction of the nature of these chemicals, does not exceed the specified number by traffic typ Frequent shipments, i.e., shipments exceeding the specified number by traffic type, need not be considered in the analysis if the quantity of hazardous chemicals is less than the quantity shown in the table in Appendix A (adjusted for the appropriate toxicity limit, meteorology, and control room air exchange rate).
1.78-5 TABLE 1TOXICITY LIMITS (IDLH LIMITS) FOR SOME HAZARDOUS CHEMICALSChemicalToxicity LimitaChemicalToxicity Limitappmbmg/m3cppmbmg/m3cAcetaldehydeAcetone Acrylonitrile Anhydrous ammonia Aniline Benzene Butadiene Butene Carbon dioxide Carbon monoxide Chlorine Ethyl chloride Ethyl ether Ethylene dichloride Ethylene oxide2000250085300 100 5002000400001200103800 19005080036006000149 210 3801600 4400asphyxiant7360 1320309880 5700200 720FluorineFormaldehyde Halon 1211 Halon 1301 Helium Hydrogen cyanide Hydrogen sulfide Methyl alcohol Nitrogen (compressed or liquified)
Sodium oxide Sulfur dioxide Sulfuric acid Vinyl chloride Xylene252020000 5000050100600010010009005024asphyxiant551507800asphyxiant2520152600 3915This table lists commonly encountered chemicals but the list is not all-inclusiv A more completelist of chemicals is in Reference 5.a Adapted from NUREG/CR-6624, "Recommendations for Revision of Regulatory Guide 1.78" (Ref. 5).b Parts of vapor or gas per million parts of air by volume at 25C and 760 torr (standard temperature and pressure).c Approximate milligrams of particulate per cubic meter of air, at standard temperature and pressure, based on listed ppm values.For release of hazardous chemicals from stationary sources or from frequently shippedmobile sources in quantities that do not meet the screening criteria, detailed analysis should be performed for control room habitabilit Licensees are encouraged to make use of risk information, particularly when requesting related license amendment The guidance for risk evaluation is provided in Regulatory Position Licensees may continue to use the traditional engineering approach for control room habitability evaluation; the guidance for this approach is provided in Regulatory Position 3. 2. RISK EVALUATIONFor releases of hazardous chemicals from stationary sources or from frequently shippedmobile sources in quantities that do not meet the screening criteria in Regulatory Position 1.1 or 1.78-61.2, detailed analyses should be performed for control room habitabilit Licensees may providerisk information to demonstrate that the radiological risk to the public from such toxic chemical releases is small, consistent with the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statemen Release of toxic chemicals that have the potential to result in a significant concentration in the control room need not be considered for further detailed evaluation if the releases are of low frequencies (10-6per year or less) because the resultant low levels of radiological risk are considered acceptabl If demonstrated, an acceptable level of risk may be used by licensees to support license amendment request To facilitate risk-informed license amendments, risk information should be provided inaccordance with the guidance set forth in Regulatory Guide 1.174 (Ref. 3). One key principle in risk-informed regulation is that the acceptable level of risk (defined in terms of quantitative health objectives of QHOs) is a small fraction (0.1%) of other risks to which the public is exposed. Procedures outlined in the "Framework for Risk-Informed Changes to the Technical Requirements of 10 CFR Part 50," an attachment to SECY-00-0198 (Ref. 6), may also be used as guidelines for quantifying risk If the level of risk associated with the release of a toxic chemical is not acceptable, detailed control room habitability evaluation should be performe A method acceptable to the NRC staff for evaluating the habitability of a control room is described in Regulatory Position 3. 3. CONTROL ROOM HABITABILITY EVALUATIONWhen performing a detailed evaluation of control room habitability during a hazardouschemical release using this guidance, the metric to be used for each chemical is the maximum concentration (toxicity limit) that can be tolerated without physical incapacitation of a control room operato In deriving the toxicity level in the control room, the detailed calculations should take into account several factors: accident type, release characterization (e.g., release rate, duration), atmospheric dispersion characteristics including prevailing meteorological conditions at the site, and the air exchange rate of the control roo Guidance pertaining to the detailed calculations is provided belo Table 2 of this guide lists the chemical and control room data for an evaluation of control room habitability.3.1Toxicity LimitsTable 1 gives the toxicity limits (in ppm by volume and mg/m3) for the chemicals listed; amore complete list of chemicals and their toxicity limits is provided in Reference These limits are based on the immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH) exposure level concept (Ref. 7)
formulated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The IDLH value or limit, based on a 30-minute exposure level, is defined as one that is likely to cause death or immediate or delayed permanent adverse health effects if no protection is afforded within 30 minute For each chemical considered, the IDLH limit can be tolerated for 2 minutes without physical incapacitation (for example, severe coughing, eye burn, or severe skin irritation) of an average huma Thus, a 2-minute exposure to the IDLH limits provides an adequate margin of safety in protecting control room operators, and these limits are recommended (Ref. 5). It is expected that a control room operator will take protective measures within 2 minutes (adequate 1.78-7time to don a respirator and protective clothing) after the detection and, therefore, will not besubjected to prolonged exposure at the IDLH concentration levels.If toxicity limits of released chemicals are not available and no detection instruments areavailable in the control room for the hazardous chemicals under consideration, the human detection threshold, such as the odor threshold, may be used. 3.2Accident Types and Release Characteristics Two types of industrial accidents should be considered for each source of hazardouschemicals: maximum concentration accidents and maximum concentration-duration accidents.A maximum concentration accident is one that results in a short-term puff or instantaneousrelease of a large quantity of hazardous chemical An example of this type accident would be the failure of a manhole cover on the chemical container or the outright failure of the container itsel Such failure could occur during the transportation of a container as a result of a handling mishap, or it could be caused by naturally or accidently produced environments such as earthquakes, flooding, fire, explosive overpressure, or missile A significant inventory could be released in this mode while the balance would be released over an extended period of time.For a maximum concentration accident involving hazardous chemicals, the instantaneousrelease of the total contents of one of the following should be considered in the analysis: (1) the largest storage container within the guidelines that is located at a nearby stationary facility, (2) the largest shipping container within the guidelines that is frequently transported near the site (for multiple containers of equal size, the failure of only one container unless the failure of that container could lead to successive failures), or (3) the largest container stored onsite (normally the total release from this container unless the containers are interconnected in such a manner that a single failure could cause a release from several containers).A maximum concentration-duration accident is one that results in a long-term, low-leakage-rate releas The majority of onsite chlorine releases experienced to date have been of this type, involving leakage from valves or fittings and resulting in a long-term release with a leakage rate from near zero to less than one pound of chlorine per secon Given warning, only breathing apparatus is necessary to protect the control room operator from this kind of releas However, because such a release might continue unabated for many hours, self-contained breathing apparatus, a tank source of air with manifold outlets, or equivalent protection capable of operation for an extended period of time should be available.For a maximum concentration-duration accident, the continuous release of hazardouschemicals from the largest safety relief valve on a stationary, mobile, or onsite source within the guidelines should be considere .78-8TABLE 2CHEMICAL AND CONTROL ROOM DATA FORHABITABILITY EVALUATIONCHEMICAL Name of hazardous chemical Type of source (stationary or mobile) Human detection (odor) threshold, ppm or mg/m3 (if available) Toxicity limit (IDLH limit), ppm or mg/m3 Maximum quantity of hazardous chemical involved in incident Maximum continuous release rate of hazardous chemical Vapor pressure, torr, of hazardous chemical (at maximum ambient plant temperature) Fraction of chemical flashed and rate of boiloff when spilling occurs Distance of source from control room 10. Meteorological dataCONTROL ROOM Volume of the control room, including the volume of all other areas supplied by the control room emergency ventilation system Normal flow rates in cubic feet per minute for - unfiltered inleakage or makeup air
- filtereda makeup air- filtered recirculated air Emergency flow rates for the above Time required to isolate the control room a "Filtered air" refers to the air filtered through filters that have an established removal capability for the particularchemical being considered.For both types of accidents, release of contents during an earthquake, tornado, or floodshould be considered for chemical container facilities that are not designed to withstand these natural event In the evaluation of control room habitability, it may also be appropriate to consider hazardous chemical releases coincident with the radiological consequences (e.g., of a design basis loss-of-coolant accident for plants that are vulnerable to both events simultaneously)
and demonstrate that such coincident events do not produce an unacceptable level of risk.For chemicals that are not gases at 100F and normal atmospheric pressure but are liquidswith vapor pressures in excess of 10 torr, consideration should be given to the rate of flashing and boiloff to determine the rate of release to the atmosphere and the appropriate time duration of the 1.78-9releas For lighter-than-air gases, the buoyancy effect should be considered in determining thedispersion characteristics.3.3Atmospheric DispersionThe atmospheric transport of a released hazardous chemical should be calculated using adispersion or diffusion model that permits temporal as well as spatial variations in release terms and concentration The NRC uses a computer code, HABIT, for control room habitability evaluatio The HABIT code is described in NUREG/CR-6210, "Computer Codes for Evaluation of Control Room Habitability (HABIT)" (Ref. 8). This code has two modules, EXTRAN and CHEM, for calculation of chemical concentration and exposure, respectivel The model in EXTRAN, a Gaussian plume or puff dispersion model, allows longitudinal, lateral, and vertical dispersion The model also allows for the effect of wakes and for additional dispersion in the vertical direction when the distance between the release point and the control room is smal Other atmospheric dispersion models (e.g., ARCON96) with similar capabilities may be used for dispersion calculations.Irrespective of the dispersion model or the analysis tool used, the value of the atmosphericdilution factor between the release point and the control room that is used in the analysis should be that value that is exceeded only 5% of the time.When boiloff or a slow leak is analyzed, the effects of density on vertical diffusion may beconsidered if adequately substantiated by reference to data from experiment The density effect of heavier-than-air gases should not be considered for releases of a violent nature or for released material that becomes entrained in the turbulent air near building The density (buoyancy) effect of lighter-than-air gases may be considered if adequately substantiated by reference to data.3.4 Control Room Air FlowThe air flows for infiltration, makeup, and recirculation should be considered for bothnormal and accident condition The volume of the control room and all other rooms, including the ventilation systems, that share the same ventilating air, during both normal conditions and accident conditions, should be considered. The control room and emergency ventilation system should have low-leakageconstructio Low-leakage dampers or valves should be installed on the upstream side of recirculation fans or other locations where negative system pressure exists and where inleakage from contaminated atmospheric ambient air is possible.The inleakage characteristics of the control room envelope during a hazardous chemicalchallenge should be determined by testin The testing should be conducted to a recognized industry standard and performed to demonstrate control room envelope inleakage with systems and components configured and operating as they would in the event of a hazardous chemicalchalleng Any test determining inleakage should ensure that the control room envelope, its 1.78-10associated ventilation systems, and ventilation systems in adjacent areas are all aligned,functioning, and performing in a manner consistent with the licensing bases. A comprehensive test identifies all inleakage associated with the envelop It is notnecessary to identify all inleakage source However, it is imperative that the testing to determine inleakage be based upon the limiting condition for the type of challeng This limiting condition may change as systems, components, and operating modes are modifie An effective method that has been used and accepted by the staff to perform a test of envelope inleakage is ASTM E741- 95, "Standard Test Method for Determining Air Change in a Single Zone by Means of a Tracer Gas Dilution" (Ref. 9). Additional guidance on control room envelope inleakage determination for control room habitability testing is being developed and will be published as a regulatory guide.If credit is taken in the evaluation of the removal of hazardous chemicals by filtration,adsorption, or other means, a technical basis for the dynamic removal capability of the removal system considered should be provided.4.PROTECTION MEASURESFor adequate protection of the control room operators against the types of accidentalreleases discussed above, features should be included in the plant design to (1) provide capability to detect such releases, (2) isolate the control room if there is a release, (3) make the control room sufficiently leak tight, and (4) provide equipment and procedures for ensuring the use of breathing apparatus by the control room operator Provisions that are adequate for the large instantaneous release will also provide protection against the low-leakage-rate releas The guidance for Item 3 is provided in Section The guidance for other design features is provided belo Licensees may select and implement specific protection measures as long as these measures ensure adequate protectio Implementation of protection measures for a particular chemical species may be excluded if the detailed evaluation of control room habitability shows that the highest concentration predicted in the control room is below the toxicity limit.4.1Detection SystemThe detection system should be able to detect and signal a concentration level that issignificantly lower than the IDLH level, for example, a concentration level of 5 ppm for chlorin The detection system should be qualified for all expected environments, including severe environment The system should also be designated as Seismic Category I and be qualified as suc The installation of the detectors should ensure that they are protected from adverse temperature effect The manufacturer's recommendations for maintenance, testing, and calibration, as well as adjustment to such recommendations that are made by licensees, are acceptable provided they follow sound engineering practices and are compatible with the proposed applicatio Human detection, i.e., smell, may be appropriate when no detection instruments areavailable in the control room for given chemical type .78-11Quick-response detectors should be located in the fresh air inlets (both normal andemergency air intakes). It may also be appropriate, depending on the design, to have separate channels of detectors for fresh air inlets and to have detectors in the control room envelope ventilation system recirculation line The system response time, which incorporates the detection response time, the valve closure time, and associated instrument delays, should be less than or equal to the isolation time. Remote detectors may be located at storage and unloading location These detectors maybe placed and the detector trip points adjusted to ensure detection of either a leak or a container ruptur A detector trip signal should isolate the control room before the toxic chemical arrives at the isolation damper The detector trip signal should also set off an alarm and provide a readout in the control roo An alternative to the installation of remote detectors would be to provide an isolation system that uses local detectors with a very short isolation time. 4.2Isolation SystemThe capability to close the air ducts of the control room with dampers and thus isolate thecontrol room should be considered in the evaluation of control room habitabilit For onsite storage, the capability to manually isolate the control room should be provide Upon detection of a toxic chemical, a detector should initiate complete closure of isolation dampers to the control room with minimal dela The isolation time is a function of the control room design, in particular, the inleakage characteristic If the detectors are upstream from the isolation dampers, credit will be allowed for the travel time between the detectors and the damper The isolation system and its components, the recirculating filter system, and the airconditioning system should meet IEEE Std 603-1991, "Criteria for Safety Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" (Ref. 10), since these systems are needed to maintain a habitable environment in the control room during design basis radiological events.For plants that isolate control rooms, steps should be taken to ensure that the isolatedexchange rate is not inadvertently increased by design or operating erro Ventilation equipment for the control room and for the adjacent zones should be reviewed to ensure that enhanced air exchange between the isolated control room and the outside will not occu All doors leading to the control room should be kept closed when not in us .3Protection SystemIf the evaluation of possible accidents for any hazardous chemical indicates that theapplicable toxicity limits may be exceeded in the control room, measures should be in place to provide adequate protection to control room operator The use of full-face self-contained pressure-demand-type breathing apparatus (or the equivalent) and protective clothing should be considere Adequate air capacity for the breathing apparatus (at least 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />) should be readily available onsite to ensure that sufficient time is available to transport additional bottled air from offsite location This offsite supply should be capable of delivering several hundred hours of bottled ai Sufficient units of breathing apparatus should be provided for the emergency cre .78-12Storage provisions for breathing apparatus and procedures for its use should be such thatoperators can begin using the apparatus within 2 minutes after detection of a hazardous releas Breathing apparatus, air supply equipment, and protective clothing should meet the criterion that a single toxic gas event would not render nonfunctional the total inventory of such protective equipment. 5.EMERGENCY PLANNINGThe licensee should have written emergency procedures to be initiated in the event of ahazardous chemical release within or near the plan These procedures should address both maximum concentration accidents and maximum concentration-duration accidents and should identify the most probable chemical releases at the statio Methods of detecting the event by station personnel, both during normal workday operation and during minimum staffing periods (late night and weekend shift staffing), should be discusse Special instrumentation that has been provided for the detection of hazardous chemical releases should be described; the description should include the action initiated by the detecting instrument and the level at which this action is initiate The emergency procedures should describe the isolation of the control room, the use of protective breathing apparatus or other protective measures, and maintenance of the plant in a safe condition, including the capability for an orderly shut down or scra Criteria and procedures for evacuating nonessential personnel from the station should also be described.The emergency planning should include training emergency planning personnel on the useof instrument It should also include periodic drills on the procedures.Arrangements should be made with Federal, State, and local agencies or other cognizantorganizations for the prompt notification of the nuclear power plant when accidents involving hazardous chemicals have occurred within 5 miles of the plan IMPLEMENTATIONThe purpose of this section is to provide information to licensees and applicants regardingthe NRC staff's plans for using this revised regulatory guid Except in those cases in which an applicant or licensee proposes an acceptable alternativemethod for complying with specified portions of the NRC's regulations, the methods in this guide that reflects public comments will be used in the evaluation of submittals from operating reactor licensees who voluntarily propose modifications requiring a license amendment related to the control room habitability systems with regard to release of toxic chemical Licensees may make use of risk information when requesting a related license amendmen This guide will also be used to evaluate submittals in connection with applications for construction permits, operating licenses, and combined licenses, but not for license renewal if the current licensing basis is maintaine Operating reactor licensees may continue to use the traditional engineering approach for control room habitability evaluatio Single copies of regulatory guides, both active and draft, may be obtained free of charge by writing the Reproduction andDistribution Services Section, OCIO, USNRC, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by fax to (301)415-2289, or by email to
<DISTRIBUTION@NRC.GOV>. Active guides may also be purchased from the National Technical Information Service on a standing order basi Details on this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; telephone (703)487-4650; online <http://www.ntis.gov/ordernow>. Copies of active and draft guides are available for inspectionor copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD; the PDR's mailing address is USNRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555; telephone (301)415-4737 or (800)397-4209; fax (301)415-3548; email
<PDR@NRC.GOV>.2 May be read or downloaded from NRC's web site, WWW.NRC.GOV, through The Commission's Activities.3 Copies are available at current rates from the U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328(telephone (202)512-1800); or from the National Technical Information Service by writing NTIS at 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161; (telephone (703)487-4650; www.ntis.gov/orderno Copies are available for inspection or copying for afee from the NRC Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD; the PDR's mailing address is USNRC PDR, Washington, DC 20555; telephone (301)415-4737 or (800)397-4209; fax (301)415-3548; email is PDR@NRC.GOV.1.78-13REFERENCES1.USNRC, "Evaluations of Explosions Postulated To Occur on Transportation Routes NearNuclear Power Plants," Regulatory Guide 1.91, Revision 1, February 1978.12.USNRC, "Fire Protection for Operating Nuclear Power Plants," Regulatory Guide 1.189,April 2001.13. USNRC, "An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-InformedDecisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis," Regulatory Guide 1.174, July 1998.14. USNRC, "High-Level Guidelines for Performance-Based Activities," SECY-00-0191,September 2000.25.L.B. Sasser et al., "Recommendations for Revision of Regulatory Guide 1.78,"NUREG/CR-6624, USNRC, July 1999.36. USNRC, Framework for Risk-Informed Changes to the Technical Requirements of10 CFR Part 50, an attachment to "Status Report on Study of Risk-Informed Changes tothe Technical Requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 (Option 3) and Recommendations on Risk- Informed Changes to 10 CFR 50.44 (Combustible Gas Control)," SECY-00-0198, September 14, 2000.27. NIOSH, "NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards," National Institute for OccupationalSafety and Health, 1997.8.J.V. Ramsdell, Jr., and S.A. Stage, "Computer Codes for Evaluation of Control RoomHabitability (HABIT V1.1)," NUREG/CR-6210, Supplement 1 (Prepared for the NRC by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), USNRC, October 199 Copies may be obtained from IEEE Service Center, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331.1.78-149. ASTM, "Standard Test Method for Determining Air Change in a Single Zone by Means ofa Tracer Gas Dilution, ASTM Standard E741-95, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995.10.IEEE, "Criteria for Safety Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, " IEEE Std603-1991, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 199 .78-15APPENDIX AA SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING WEIGHTS OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALSFOR CONTROL ROOM EVALUATIONSThe weights presented in the following table are based on a toxicity limit of 50 mg/m3; airexchange rates of 0.015, 0.06, and 1.2 per hour, respectively; and a Pasquill stability category F representing the worst 5% of meteorological conditions observed at a majority of nuclear plant sites. WEIGHTS OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS THAT REQUIRE CONSIDERATION IN CONTROL ROOM EVALUATIONS (FOR A 50 mg/m3 TOXICITY LIMIT ANDSTABLE METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS)Distance From Control Room (miles)aWeight (1000 lb)Air Exchange Rate0.015 per hourAir Exchange Rate0.06 per hourAir Exchange Rate1.2 per hour0.3 to 0.50.5 to 0.7 0.7 to 1.0 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5935 120 270 1300 3700 8800 2.25 8.75 30 6 .110.43 .3716.25 46.25110 a All hazardous chemicals present in weights greater than 100 lb within 0.3 mile of the control room should be consideredin a control room evaluatio An air exchange rate of 0.015 (i.e., 0.015 of the control room air by volume isreplaced by atmospheric ambient air in one hour) is considered representative of a "tight" control room that has very low-leakage construction features and automatic isolation capabilitie An air exchange rate of 0.06 per hour is considered representative of a control room that has normal leakage construction features and automatic isolation capabilities, whereas an air exchange rate of 1.2 per hour is considered representative of a control room with construction features that are not as efficient for leakage control and without automatic isolation capabilities.If the toxicity limit, air exchange rate, or meteorological conditions are differentfrom the assumptions used in the table, simple calculations using the following procedures can be performed to determine the weights of hazardous chemicals that are to be considered 1.78-16for the control room evaluatio Note that the weights in the table are based on EXTRANcalculations without the wake effect correction.Toxicity LimitThe weights presented in the table are directly proportional to the toxicity limi If aparticular chemical has a toxicity limit of 500 mg/m3, the weights from the table (based on50 mg/m3) should be increased by a factor of 10.Air Exchange RateThe weights in the table are inversely proportional to the air exchange rat If acontrol room has an exchange rate of 2.4 per hour, the weights from the table (based on 1.2 per hour) are decreased by a factor of tw In other words, the weights are appropriately adjusted for the actual fresh air exchange rat The current crop of control rooms with automatic isolation capabilities may have leakage characteristics different from those listed in the Tabl Again, appropriate adjustments of weight should be made based on the actual air exchange rat It should be noted that the use of an air exchange rate of less than 0.06 per hour for an isolated control room requires that the control room leakage rate be verified by periodic field testing.Pasquill Stability Category If it is determined that the worst 5th-percentile meteorology is better (Condition E)or worse (Condition G) than Condition F (the condition used in the table) at a given site, the following adjustments should be made to the table: Pasquill Stability CategoryWeight Multiplication FactorE 2.5F 1.0 G 0.4The Pasquill Stability Category F represents the worst 5th-percentile meteorologyobserved at the majority of the nuclear power plant site REGULATORY ANALYSISA draft regulatory analysis was published with the draft of this guide when it waspublished for public comment (DG-1087, February 2001). No changes were necessary, so a separate value/impact statement for Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.78 has not been prepare A copy of the draft value/impact statement is available for inspection or copying for a fee in the NRC's Public Document Room at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, under DG-108 An electronic version of DG-1087 is available in the NRC's Electronic Reading Room under accession number ML010440064.