ML20003H247
| ML20003H247 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse |
| Issue date: | 03/24/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20003H245 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-346-81-05, 50-346-81-5, NUDOCS 8105050399 | |
| Download: ML20003H247 (2) | |
Text
I' v,
Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Toledo Edison Company Docket No. 50-346 As a result of the inspection conducted on March 9-13, 1981, and in accord-ance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980),
the following violations were identified:
10 CFR 50.55a(g) and Technical Specification 4.0.5 states in part, that an inservice inspection system for pumps shall be established in accordance with Section XI of the ASME Code, 1974 Edition and Addenda through Summer of 1975.
1.
ASME Section XI, Article IWP-3000 paragraph IWP-3100 requires measurement of pump inlet pressure before pump startup, while paragraph IWP-3110 requires the establishment of reference values for pump inlet pressure.
Contrary to the above, the monthly inservice test for containment spray pumps 1-1 and 1-2 does not include measurement of pump inlet pressure before pump startup, nor have reference values for pump inlet pressure been established.
This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement I) (50-346/81-05-01).
2.
ASME,Section XI, Article IWP-4000, paragraph IWP-4110 " Quality" specifies norminal instrument accuracies of 12% of full scale for pressure measurement, while paragraph IWP-4111 " Range" specifies a maximum permissiable full scale range of not greater than four times the reference value,of the measured parameter.
Contrary to the above, certain of the instruments used for the accumula-tion of pump test data do not meet the accuracy and/or range requirements specified.
This is a Severity Level VI violation (Supplement I) (50-346/81-05-02).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within twenty-five days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) corrective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective RI O 5050 lE$C)Cj
,=..
k I
i Appendix A MAR 2 5 1981 action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of-the Atomic Energy Act of 1954,-as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
. Dated b '2'l ?l
-)" W rN -
)
C. E. ;Iorelius, Acting Direct r' Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection i
V I
y i
I r!