ML20010G983
| ML20010G983 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/31/1981 |
| From: | Chamberlain D, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20010G979 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900507 NUDOCS 8109220740 | |
| Download: ML20010G983 (13) | |
Text
f ORGANIZAT;ON:
SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAGO, ILLIN0IS REPORT NO.: 99900507/81-03 INSPECTION] ATE (S): 7/6-10/81 INSPECTION ON-SITE HOURS: 32 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Sargent and Lundy Engineers ATTN:
Mr. R. W. Patterson, Senior Partner 55 East Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60603 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
J. E. McFarlat.d, Head, Quality Assurance Division TELEPHONE:
(312) 269-6370 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Architect Engineering Services NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY:
Sargent and Lundy (S&L) has been the Architect Engineer on eight nuclear power plant facilities that are now in service.
Presently, S&L is the Architect Engineer on 11 facilities that are in the design and/or construction phase and S&L is engaged n 12 modification, repair or service contracts for nuclear power plant facilities.
h, h. bdb ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
D. D. Chamberla'in, Reactor Systems cection (RSS)
OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
APPROVED BY:
g p
C. C Ala'le, ChTe O SS INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES: Sargent and Lundy Topical Report No. SL-TR-1A and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B.
B.
SCOPE: Quality assurance records, design change control and status of previous inspection findings.
8109220740 010731 PDR GA999 EECSA 99900507
ORGANil>G10N:
SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT NO.: 99900507/81-03 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 4 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(0 pen) Nonconformancs (81-01): The Design Criteria Status Report did not show the latest revision or issue date of a design criteria docu-ment.
The Design Criteria Status Report :as revised to correct the specific nonconformance identified and the prevention of recurrence of this problem was discussed at a project team meeting. Surveys of status reports were conducted for each project to determine accuracy and completeness of data. The corrective action required due to problems found during the surveys is in-process. The Qi Division Audit Section has committed to conduct a generic audit by July 15, 1981, of all projects to verify the adequacy of the surveys, and to provide follow up examination of corrective action accomplished. The NRC inspector will review the generic audit results during the next inspection.
2.
(0 pen) Nonconformance (81-01): Some design criteria documents do not include the applicable issues of codes, standards or regulatory guides.
Documents were revised to correct the specific nonconformance identified and the cause of the problem and means to prevent recurrence were discussed at a project team meeting. A survey of all design criteria issued or revised after April 4,1979, was conducted for each project for inclerion of the applicable issue and/or addenda of Regulatory Guides, codes and standards. The corrective action required due to problems found during the surveys is ir-process. The QA Division Audit Section has committed to conduct a generic audit by July 15, 1981, of all projects to verify the adequacy of the surveys, and to provide follow up examination of corrective action accomplished. The NRC inspector will review the generic audit results during the next inspection.
3.
(0 pen) Nonconformance (81-01): An electrical Class 1E component was misclassified in the Clinton Power Station Classification Criteria Document.
O ORGANIZATIO'N:
SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS-CHICAGO, ILLIN0IS REPORT NO.: 99900507/81-03 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 4 The Classification Criteria was revised M clearly indicate that the electrical safety-related portions of tLe Component Cooling Water System are Class 1E and to provide proper classifications to such items as containment isolation. A survey of the Classi.fication Criteria was con-ducted for each project to determine accuracy and completeness of data.
The corrective action necessary as c result of the survey is in-process.
The QA Division Audit Section has conunitted to conduct a generic audit by July 15, 1981, of all projects to verify the adequacy of the surveys, and to provide follow up examination of corrective action accomplished. The NRC inspector will review the generic audit results during the next inspec-tion.
4.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-02):
It does not appear that Sargent and Lundy procedures in the Electrical Project Engineering Division assure prompt determina; ion of nonconformances and prompt action in controlling and correcting nonconformances.
Quality Assurance Procedure GQ-16.03, Revision 0, has been written that requires each engineering department (electrical, mechanical and structural) to establish a department procedure to control the docu-mentation and correction of errors and deficiencies found in Sargent and Lundy design documents. The Electrical and Meci,anical Departments have issued new standards and the Structural Department revised existing standards to meet the requirements of GQ-16.03. Training on the new procedural requirements is to be completed by August 15, 1981. The NRC inspector will verify completion of the training and will review the implementation of the new procedural requirements during future inspections.
5.
(0 pen) Nonconformance (81-02): The Sargent and Lundy internal audit system is deficient in a number of areas resulting in a reduction of comprehensiveness and effectiveness.
Sargent and Lundy has committed to revise Quality Assurance Procedure GQ 18.01 by July 31, 1981, for control and guidance in the determina-tion of the need for supplemental project or generic audits and the scheduling for such audits. Also, the training of QA auditors in this area will be completed by August 15, 1981. The NRC inspector will verify completion of the committed action during the next inspection.
6.
(Closed) Follow Up Item (81-02): Seismic guides were installed in the RWCV steam tunnel pipe penetration assembly without the proper gap measurements (Clinton Project). The problem could be due to a design insensitivity to the installation difficulties.
Although no formal instructions were given to the field for installing the seismic guides, design drawings did give the clearances that were required between the piping and seismic guides. The Sargent and Lundy design group also discussed the installation of the guides at a site meeting and provided the field group with cut out paper models and verbal instructions for installing the guides. The constructor was
ORGANIZATIO'N: SARGENT & LUNDY ENGINEERS CHICAG0, ILLIN0IS REPORT NO.: 99900507/81-03 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 4 advised to put shims of the reouired size between the pipe and the seismic guide while the guides were welded in place. The NRC inspector concludes that adequate design attention and sensitivity were given to the installation difficulties.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Quality Assurance Records The NRC inspector examined the Sargent and Lundy Topical Report and applicable procedures to determine quality assurance prsgram commit-ments. The QA record storage facility (single storaos) was inspected and the following documents were exa.nined to verify implementation of the comitments: QA records index, personnel access memo, nine record submittal schedules, drawing and specification lists, QA record audit report, and 19 QA records retrieved from the records center. Relative to the facilities and documents examined, the NRC inspector found that the quality assurance program ccmmitments were being implemented.
2.
Design Change Control The NRC inspector examined the Sargent and Lundy Topical Report and applicable procedures to determine quality assurance program commit-ments. Seventeen Engineering Change Notices and affected design documents were examined to verify implementation of the commitments.
Relative to the documents examined, the NRC inspector found that the quality assurance program comitments were being implemented-however, further inspection in this area will be conducted durir' subsequent inspections.
PERSONS CONTACTED SAR6FNT 3 LVWDY 7ddD/Sl C wpany oates Occitet/ Report No. 9'M00507 Ml-03 Inspector 0, (Hiln)8FRi> TIN Page [ of d,
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Orinti ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
R06LRT Rn6)N
%!CR G A creRD)N4TcR sal 8c668T 4. JOHN 4nrJ
/PA 6MRoiNAroR 5.X I M R.
CArAB4 t' N 68.
ASSisrAN 7 5dL ARTnUR J. 5KAL6 OA 600RD)NATOR SL L L, tA GDRDON bA CooR 0\\HnTc8 SkL
- 1. 1 TAL4610 56wicR GA ADMINI57gA Tca SAL R C.
r/1ARTiw paioR eA AgoircR S4L 6,
VA8c7 56W10R GA CoNTROLLfR 54L LP.
DolDER
@A cocR0ih ATOR SdL L.T.
5?urnsN(
E 04 n PRD'iE CT LFDD6R SLL f C.
H6)DfR MPMD-fM6cT rMNA6fR SAL rd,T r406LL6R A6sisma7 mua uA06R S 4 L.
6 A. NcROST8nrA Mohc7 SOfrRvi608 5LL WJ KVL)NSK1 fh<TfCT SUPEKYl50R SAL 16.
KELN05KY PROJct7 L6AD6R SAL l
0.C.
PATf:L SWFRVislNG 06516W FN6R.
Sd L 1
l e.
nspec. tor D.
cMMEEL&lrL D'
o,
-}j-$07---
3 Scope / Module Ml0 2_ L___ _. -
~
~~
-~
ShkQP& a O-OOCUMENTSEXAMINED 4
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
]
h A'] l h EENYt
~
W&h 5~ 22-8l f f A mjW knkanMyllutW z
6 SauL 3
_4 Ady aEt (6 4lAupl' 64dadth6A 5 -n-at Y '1L N - Y b g tik
--- k i
% R eh ma hj$- kudnhnd_[k & s1 dltk_Rp4c_%u lik 5-22-81 4
_A l
5~
b kutiw d St$a_'(dp uf L.224L G
6 Llto ; %wu PanntlLLApd - y ut 3-z25L l
1 A
swsap W & cat _. p u Asuts 9 4 - k m _ 5-2241 h hwylittb -
hfthhijkd
- W k k k>dt-Lw Bu%I 6%d 6-3 0- 81 S
5
~
%ukL AuuL Fnhid% A1'%chgud N 1
9
(
clo-u4 ~60A' lader
~
zaz-BL lo G
E y Bife % W,b L sc_A Ap dLih_
+29/
- i LJ Il
_.WY yN.1 Olltht< Y b h1 $
OM b
(
Ih I]- {f0
$ST A I
l l
i a
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Drder 1.
Sequential Item fiumber 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document i'
3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Docinnent 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
A t
Inspeqtor.,Ddfl8Mgh&)f{__
[f
,.G.MO.0 07J bcope/ Module G 170 23--------
~
DOCUMENTS EXAfilNED l
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 C 0 a l M S _ g (f u ' d e ~) S kn u % tco, L;tk ad Onntwd; I0-3I-77 RurS l
I2 B_.vuu Bu L me Valv<k 13
_R S
1 __]NA d Oa&tuA kotikt~t Tlvlan Vneiub ?7luZu 5-l%)
11c.209I
- I&
3 (fuaAnn
(;G-3.03
( % % t< d P G & n d 7-RI-85 $r 4 15 3
(% a@ D Ab h
% & L1 k m d ll-s-76
& 3_
%kib (?ndN 16 9
9%am %nt in tJRC LD A% - kt% Ned 7-141
~
- 1z" %J FALt I9 8
froAL G6h 15 o(8 dha Em m) Allani h_- I- % I 6?u O 1
IS 3
Stni_ sds - 7 6%wt lis Mcwcie aJ sthatJ of ht
& - u rt I
htnick Stnuitad $t$E Otihua NnRl15 4 28 I9 Maut A&me au2 L M A kt 19si L 30-trI &c_2
_20 1
.9 sdanA sAs-2z frue. R Ri & J a m d d L 3 KL l
L&J Anu%J eda (Lata n0ed24
_2I 3
. Mn) sAs-23 kvL4u. L6 ~J c%ml d
(, 8L i
Rl,LhadPMG6&p&Jtskuj L% J;t G {n "?tulat fLJ b
_)
NORAS-25 Document Types:
Columns:
l 1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Type of Document 2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal itemo 3.
Procedure 7.
Le tter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) i, 4.
Revision (If applicable)
U*
'I* * ']S OA 0 Inspoc, tor _ D J ]$ @ 0ff U)g 9
7;,
Score /f'odule 9270Zj-
~
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED l
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 22 3
$Jan) SAS-27 l?<wrds &E ad ttocand E d 38'l lt2dtid Lat>>J S1LLJMA-]La<uww 'NeRAs-2l" 23 3
L kA sA4-251 6%refn. Law adf k en w J el V3-8'I
'a% f k & d u) 1 % )L Auik d k w w iJians-27 '
24 3
LAn) sAs - 4n MJw 'a LL4 'ALtd LtJ
& -3 SI Fnemt kul&%
noans
'28 '
25 3
BI-2G$ f$d5xid SswtDd !ParrA>es h, SwL ad 6-2WI 01r O _ y cerw tu ; L 2nk,sJ Anwa'; denA9
~
dbi J h alh I
3 fnALL M brtiaJ(% K kwafnnu.d 6-22-%J
@u-o j
i U
/
b ikAS-2b bt[cYMb ln 01?htt bu km L
i Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item ?! umber 2.
Specification 6.
Internal itemo 2.
Type of Document
' 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
.Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
-Insp'eckor Q _t'.}] @ g dL[
f7,
Opp l Scope /Modulc_.33%8____.--
"""" l-~ "'
DocusanS unmcD l
%&&mf M&,4
)
l; 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 l
1 4
%U %LLkp(t_Lis 3 er 5 Ynculwu G9-8d3 Pksnalu Qe_)%
9 -2L18. hv 5_
i
_L 4
$$hta&_Cll%-y {fliCd
% 2Rh opw /6slai) k25-WI C i os
_. 3 S
A-yL_ liCU
- k. 2113 S KL i
CLhad CQ 91Li_1_L_zosz
_5 Tr 4-/5-JL a
Y.had 5
?b ary) &l~w _$ & _W 209I
_h-/Gf_l_
L f
}]ild L 2Q77 G
_.S I
j]_14/
S ELn' (!Ldi 92Li %
20_68 u
!I- + r/
Gbutdh&>
%G fic, 9
8 3b5/E_
20(,2 u
la 8
L (l
'Ylifl1 Tlr, 2040 II 3-I2 - T/
II B
%aww ('0ws 1hto Mc.
2022 n!
2-27-V/
i I2
$4?c u~,1 CU) N$a'&
I939
. it 12 -/7-86
\\
\\3 3
Ebtit~ 'Lidk PI-CP-004 M d
,d %l5.<Lunf_
k-b Wut 'Y1iCh (ECN)
I
C d L k j +iL L A 2 i 2 0 1L L 2173 (D%
l
_I4 S
GLnd LG it ~
. A-28-KL i
W 5
b27s/
i i
l I
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Numner l
2.
Speci fica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) j
.Insit dor _ Q,_ Q1(kd6dBld LN _ _
L ff0 9 UU Scope / Module 379768_ _.
~
~
~ ~ ~
DOCUMDUS EXMUNED 1
2 TITI.E/SilBJECT 3
4
.!N Z
b towO Y L t0 $c 2/h3 YNbr~x fL>wwf>Ah Y2/4l l
M D._
b h
atnx Y Q 9Ychb '[r.
22 7/
ll b-2[~X haal LL gm
- yle, 22G8
(%h~ (%eA)) 923-i)l Ig 3
I0 b
. tar,E's Y$tbb 'kt$ sci bit 21 TI
/{
'l~ /S-}3/
2O b
Ib b*
NC 2/'[-O 1/
Y/8 k (Wi_a l
1-l
,i l
~..
o l
_.M Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA r;anual S.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
)
.IpsYNur.JL_LWha8ERLAIN
$j;$l 2.- fff-Scope / Module 311608 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
- ~ ~
QRf% wC4 1
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 1
4
.SL-TR-1 A _Zp] 6m1 1~di 12
/0-31-lZ ee 5 2
4
_GO -17,ol.--.LhditJ%%Mt-fa_!f.e64 dunw_%h 7-3616. Am3
_3 4
_G1p-L2az Q d % % w. A u d e _ G W c tu L,_ % t:
.2-3h& A L.
bY'h$eb %
.htDts. $b k_w (&&
LD-pl-70 ktig)ddI4%f__cw%0ALaja 4-3 RSIP-Io Puu1+u dln w 5-15-3J_
S 6
EL L R 2A Llik a.) GA %L k Lis 1
~'GA % ) L eslM L L A6 w oL&)f W) )
L D! & s L % bc kkf%s 5-2'l-SL b
8 s-!?-n ]Gr o 1
9 3
e s
DA &TXuu LLAb (w >
u4-1 ka e
8 bn Run) XJuttJ %blLG (LAlb 5 inis-n Ar o__
l M hen) kanttJ L&LL The/'UwnD k-H-W0 hv L 4
5
_LL 8
dA bea) &k k)L} dub
' A!ud-Gha')
3-n 79 av 3
'tI W
4A RwJ Lh3b1LLLG
~
)
2dl4L kr zi 13 8
%& %ID LLLh L2dl k) 2 72 _Sc b J+
8 IPA
&at) hk;ttd LLM
( 7722dle Mit) 7-n-79 Br_L_
15 g
&A %4 Mtd RLjuL (84<r &)
,.297g g,z Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
{,Insphc. tor J d dl[ d bbb d N Docket flo.
QQ -Q]_
Paje f_13 _ ~
Scope / Module J __% D0 8 DOCUMEtlTS EXAMitlED L
l 1
2 TITLE /SilBJECT 3
4 l
lb 8
iM 4 ~ n ' ad )cleA)> (?
wulul_
L20 -C.
5 80
\\
l
_]7
($$
hats js_ f hnana l Elt_)0 % L wA_A m Q ]f %iua)
/ 2&XL l
1%
b'
- Ltr
'9
_2 WLj[61Lfy_Au fnitibg '.1_jp 4
- - 22R. 56 - 8L l
l
_ tat $lfauaLe adDhAlf A L PAf
%g 1
ll - 22 3 9 1024 i 20 2
_JLut l\\
21 2
AL%
hap 3 H - 252k 4 78_
_22 2
}t?S34 Gdd ak (PM b24 - 7/z 28 2
H -283C' Leta )Ld % 6%L JD2-%
H-2IW L L _ Q u 2-2_2 ?S_
24 2
my
\\
25*
_Mj ' 911.
L 6%)h bm Lesb up,2 U l
2 (,
1
_E-12-1 EL Eaw d J % Lts fbe L 27 1
E-2/ H - 4 h4 'AL4h im 1,s. E2l fud 23 1
E - 152-I (I) b% Aufd)- Llo '6%2_593 6"1M Ne B 29 l
E-189-4 OJuil Supy Att
/#w 6 i
30 1
AP12 Wdy. 4.tGKt/ k g IC 2L J & % Ic akn.
[L v V _
3I
__1 AP43 W. kk 490 V kbL IB-I A c E-
~
t
?
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item f; umber 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document j
4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) 1 5
i.Ipsp@c. tor h, CtlAM66kLdld ReportNo.]g$pQ1 D cket No.
3 f_. q3_
lCuope/ Module _399CQ8 DOCUMENTS EXAMINED j
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 l
_3_2 I
M-4+
PZ1D kwA 'Kd &
hv i
93 1
M-47 P4To Ah Aac.186 X ike-
_fw R SL 2 Arm j
34 _ _1 m '7 3 PAID __nislLdJgt Cr&A A b A /
Av_6 r
R2
_brf__
~~
i 35 l
H)- 49 ) (%iiilL duLnW W ~2L 18 brR Y
_lL1 _
1 r/1-7 1 3 c 4 p<_j
&O Wed fazQcp
&c_8_.
]bb Il Eq u (h3e N. LURlO4-l 39
?>
beet 1 m br$n~J tllt 71c 55 K'y h _
a2-_
3%
8 yed,m J h t duft $ 5/
l i
t i
j I
i l
l Document Tyres:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequent.ial Item Number j
2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document
}
4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revisfor, (If applicable)
.