Text

QA Program for Protective Packaging Div Products
	ML20125C201
Person / Time
Site:	07100046
Issue date:	12/10/1979
From:	; TELEDYNE ENERGY SYSTEMS
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20125C199	List: ML20125C196; ML20125C201;
References
	14993, TES-PPD-2, NUDOCS 8001070508
	Download: ML20125C201 (95)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:... o Q'JALITY ASSU3AITCI PLA?; 709 FRCTICTIVE PACKAGI;G DIVISIO" ??CDUCTS TIS-PPD-2 s I ApprovedD(/c(lutus. tC Manager, Protective Packaging Division ) 10 December 1979 90005197 goo 107o T Of 14993

req REVISIONS P SYM PAGE DESCRIPTION DATE APPROVED L 4 I 1 ? 4 1 t l. 90005198 i L COCE IDENT NC. GAZE r 30856 d C M G. a i ECALE PAGE b i

1. E.103 i

I s Quality Policy and Doctrine The Management of Teledyne Energy Systems subscribes to and supports a quality Program that assures product conformance to specifications. Meaningful Product Conformance to Specifications must be designed, scheculea and cuilt into the procuct. Meaningful Product Con formanc e to Specifications can only ce attained when supportec by all canagement and functional segments of the company. Meand erful Froduc t Conformance ' to Scecifica tions creates satzeriec customers and encourages new and carry-on contracts for Teledyne Energy Syste=s products. s 4 90005199 \\ m ii W

r Contents (' Page i Revision Sheet Quality Policy and Doctrine 11 Section 1.0 Introduction 1 1 2.0 Organization 2 30 quality Assurance Program 4 31 Design Control 6 32 Procure =ent Docu=ent Control 7 33 Instructions, Procedures and D awings 7 7 34 Document Control 8 35 Control of Purchased Material, Equipment and Services 9 36 Identification and Control of Materials, Parts and Cc=ponents 9 l 37 Control of Special Processes 10 38 Inspection 10 s 39 Test Control 11 3 10 Control of Measuring and Test Iquipment 11 3 11 Handling, Storage and Shipping 11 3 12 Inspection, Test and Operating Status 12 3 13 Non-Conforming Materials, Parts or 12 Co=ponents 3 14 Corrective Action 12 ,2.15 quality Assurance Records 13 3 16 Audits of quality Assurance Plan 13 1 Appendix: Applicable quality Directives A-1 Table of Contents A-2 ,,b iii 90005200

s 9 1.0 INTRCDUCTICN The Quality Assurance Plan delineated within this docu=ent has g b. been prepared to meet the intent of Appendix 3, 10 CFR 50, " Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Processing Plants" and Appendix E,10 CFR 71, " Packaging of Radioactive Material for Trans-port and Transportation of Radioactive Material Under Certain Conditions." This plan will be executed by Teledyne Energy Systees in conjunction with radioactive waste processing and handling systems fabrica-d and supplied by Teledyne Energy Systems, Protective Packaging Division. Teledyne Energy Syste=s ' functional organization arrange =ent is incorporated within this document as well as a discussion of the \\ Quality Assurance responsibility areas of each department (refer to j Fig. 1). The Quality Assurance program is described and the pertinent criteria of Appendix 3,10 CFR 50 and Appendix E,10 CFR 71 are addressed as individual items. The objective of this Quality Assurance Plan is to establish f ~ and maintain an effective and economical quality system to provide t reasonable confidence that the systems and components fabricated and supplied will perfor: satisfactorily in service. The Quality Plan design has been based upon consideration of the quality history of \\ past programs, design review and verification, and the necessity to impose controls and surveillance over critical manuf acturing and safety related activities. Quality Assurance censures contained within this plan and utilized by Teledyne Energy Syste=s have been executed and docu=ented .as a =atter of course within our norcal code of operation on other pro-grams. The Quality Assurance Plan contained herein will become effective on January 1, 198C a d will not be =ade retroactive. n 90005201

r 2.0 ORGANIZATION \\ The Teledyne Energy Systems organization is shown in Fi ure 1. The inter-relationship of quality Operations to other 6 management func tions is clearly shown. This organizational struc-ture permits a close relationship of quality personnel with program activities to achieve high progra= ef ficiency while retaining unim-peded access to higher management. The quality Operations Department has the required authority and organinational freedce to provide its inspection and control functions with independence from undue influ-ence of costs and schedules. Functionally, the Division Manager has the overall respon-sibility to coordinate all of the activities af fecting the final package such that delivery can be made within schedu2e and cost goals. These activities include design, analysis, fabrication, assembly, test, quality control, handling and shipping. These activities are acccm-plished throu'gh assigned representatives from the applicable operating departments who form the division " team." As indicated, each represent-ative is responsible to a department manager to =aintain uni =peded co=munication with high level canagement. In brief, thekualityAssurance functions of each depart- \\ s or section are as follows:

a. Central Engineering Section - Responsible for the func-tions related to design, design reviews, analysis safe-ty and reliability, and engineering documentation ce ntrol.

b. Manufacturing Department - Responsible for these functions af fecting material and production control.

c. Materials Engineering and Test Department - Responsible for activities related to material selection and 2

90005202

-u t l President s Quality $#""1 Materials 1#* "U Operations Engineering & ^ 1"1" """#8*# Manager Test Manager l I l I Quality E.ngr. Contracts Materials Engr. Mat'I. Control I i 1. I l Quality Contro) Procurement Health Physics Prod. Control I Fa bri ca tion Protective Vice President y Packaging Technical Assy. & Test Div. Manager Operations l I

" #"I Engineering l

Eanager Engineering Manager I l--- Engr. Repr. Systems Engr. l ~~ '_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. l [ l Procurement Repr. Thermal & Hyd.. _ _ _ Quality Repr. Sa fety & Reliab 'v Q _l. o k-- Mat'Is. Engr. Rep] Analj Structural O Cn l i N L-- Manuf'g. I< e p r. Lesign Ou FIGUPE 1. TELEDYNE Et'ERGY SYSTEMS ORGAtlIZATION 3-16-79

speci fica tio n, process specifications and health physics aspects of the subject deliverable. hardware. d. Quality Operations Depart =ent - The Quality Control func-tion is responsible for conducting inspection and control activities to assure that obt-of-spec hardware is identi-fied and withheld fro = use unless written and approved Quality En6 neering is charged i authority is received. with the planning and auditing aspects of Quality. This activity also includes the review of TES documentation to assure that proper inspection and control ceasures are incorporated. In certain instances the execution of portions of this quality Assurance Plan may be delegated to an outside organization but TES re-tains the responsibility for the subject program and the reliability of its products. All persons performing quality assurance func tions are given s the authority and freedom to identify quality assurance deficiencies; to initiate, reco=cend or provide corrective actions; and to verify that directions are imple=ented properly. \\ 3.0 QUA1:TY ASE"FANCT PFCGFAM The quality Assurance Program described within this document has been established and will be i=ple=ented for the design, fabrica-tion, assembly, and testing of deliverable products. The purpose of the quality Ascurance Progra= is to plan, document and carry out all of the activities required to provide adequste confidence that the products will per for= safely in service. 4 90005204

t Teledyne Energy Systems has operated within the scope of f i numerous quality Program Plans under contract to various Government agencies and has evolved, over the course of many years, a group of standards and policies contained in manuals which address most quality Assurance Criteria. This doeutent maximizes the use of these existing manuals, by re ference, where applicable. The manuals which delineate procedure and policies regarding many quality Assur-ance activities are as follows: a. Cuality Manual (ES-265) - This manual, =aintained by / the quality Operations Department, details tee activi-ties of quality personnel through individual Quality Directives. Those directives applicable to this plan are contained herein as Appendix 1. b. Engineerine Documentation Standards - This document, maintained by the Central Engineering sec tion des-cribes drawing and process preparation, release and revision controls, i c. Ma nu fa c turi n e. Dec.artment Procedures Manual - This canual, maintained by'the Manu facturing Depar tment \\ covers receipt, id en ti fica t ion, storage control and shipment of caterials as well as tool control and equipment =aintenance, d. Procurement policies and Procedures Manual - This manual =aintained by the Administration Ocpartment, details activities pertaining to the procurement of materials, equipment and services. ( 90005205 ~'

The text of this plan however, shall supersede and take / \\ precedence over all other documents and specific quality Directives contained in Appendix I. A brie f discussion o f the applicable quality Assurance Criteria requirements follow. 31 Design Control The design control function is to assure that the appli-cable regulatory requirements, the product design configuration, and materials of construction, as described in the applicable specifica-tions, are properly translated into drawings, specifications, pro-cedures and special instructions. The product assembly, subassembly and ecmponent detail draw-ings will be accomplished in the Design and Test Group of the Central Engineering Sectien. Drawings are reviewed and approved by a checking group within the same group to assure ecmpliance with the applicable drafting practices. The drawings will also be reviewed for verifica-tion of design adquacy by the structural analysis, safety and reliabil-ity, and thermal' and hydraulic sections, as applicable. The design s verification will be achieved by calculative methods. Additional re-view will be per formed by the Materials Section of the Materials Engi-neering and Test Department, if applicable, to assure the suitability of materials, components, equipment and processes for their intended t application. The Materials sngineering and Test Department also will generate material and process specifications, as required, to achieve performance parameters. Quality Cperations will record and document drawing and specification changes to assure that each d elivered end item (package) is traceable back to the proper change level of the drawings and speci-fications de fining it. 's (~ ~ 90005206 6

Final Engineering document review and approval will be per-formed by the Division or Engineering Manager to assure that the proper acceptance criteria for inspections and test are delineated and that all of the appropriate approvals have been obtained. The procedures defining the activities of drawing, specifi-cation and procese preparation, release, and revisions are set forth in the " Engineering Documentation Systems" manual. The drafting practices specified in the manual basically conform to MIL-D-1CCO, Form 2 and to MIL-STD-100. 4 3.2 Procurement Document Control Procurement documents will be reviewed by Quality Engi-neering to ensure that listed materials, equipment or services are clearly specified, to assure that adequate quality controls are suitably included or referenced in the procurement documents, and to add the appropriate directions for certifications and source and/or recieving irspection in accordance with the requirements of Quality Directive E.1 (Procurement Docu=ents - Quality Requirements). This directive in conjunction with the "precurement Policies and Procedures Manual" constitute the egntrol for processing of procure- ~ ment documents or char.ges thereto. i 33 Instructions. Procedures and Drawines Teledyne Energy Systems uses three types o f specifica-tions/ procedures in addition to engineering and vendor drawings and topical reports. The three types of documents employed are: test and/or assembly procedures, caterial specifications and process specifica-b. tions. The latter two, of course, are only 6enerated when there is ? l 90005207 l

no equivalent commercial or Government specification. \\ Test ana,'ar assembly procedures are product peculiar doc-uments issued to delineate a sequence of events, the use of special equipment or facilities, data requirements not specified by drawings or added compliance criteria. Material specifications are used to delineate minimum functional, physical, chemical, electrical or mechanical require-ments of a material to assure design adequacy. Process specifications are used to describe equipment, materials, processing requirements and quality assurance provisions required for an acceptable product. 1 The activities affecting the preparation, release and re-l vision of these documents are spelled out in the " Engineering Occu-I mentation Standards" manual. Test ar.d/or assembly procedures will be generated in the design and test' group of the Central Engineering Section. Material s and process specifications will be originated by the Materials Engi-neering and Test Department, i 3.4 Document Control \\ The document control function is to assure that all engi-neering documents including drawings, specifications and procedures are issued, properly reviewed and approved, distributed and revised in accordance with established procedures. These functions are achieved by the Central Engineering Sec tion. Engineering document release and revision procedures are specified in the " Engineering Occumentation Standards" manual. The t., required document approval and document distribution list will be 8 90005208

as delineated by Engineering Pro 6 ram Directive. ( The Quality Operations document control functions include chan6e level documentation for end item traceability. These activ-ities are delineated in Quality Directive 2.1, " Configuration Control." 3.5 Control o f Purchased Ma teriat. Equipment and Services Depending on the criticality of the item (s) to be purchased, and/or vendor performance history, Quality Pre-Award Surveys will be conducted as appropriate. Evaluations consider items such as =anufac-turing equipment, inspection tools, control procedures, and personnel qualifications in accordance with Quality Directive 8.1, " Procure =ent i l Documents - Quality Requirements." Receivin6 inspection will be l conducted on purchased hardware and services to ascertain confor=ance to appropriate specifications and procure =ent documents in accordance with the requirements of quality Directive 3 6, " Quality Control of Procured Materials." Accepted ite=s will be tagged and stamped by the inspector de' noting his acceptance. Non-conformances are docu- =ented in accordance.with quality Directive 3 3, "Teledyne Reporting System" and the discrepanct item withheld until approved written dis-position is received, as diseussed in Section 3 11. \\ 3.6 Identification and Control of "aterials. Parts and Components Accepted materials and components will be identified, stored, released and fabricated in accordance with the controls of l the Manufacturing Department Procedures manual and Quality Directive 3 4, " Quality Control of Energy Systems Division Fabricated Material." Non-conformances that might develop during the fabrication process will be documented per the requirements of quality Directive 3 3 and ('- handled as discussed in Section 3 5 above. 90005209

4 37 Control of Specini Frocecses Special processes will be documented on book form drawings, \\ if peculiar to a particular program, er Process Epecifications if applicable to multiple programs. The control of these documents for release or revision is as discussed in Section 3 4 Periodically these proceeses will be audited to the requirecents of quality Direc-tive 5 3, "Feriodic Internal quality Audits." Ecployee qualification for such skill areas as potting, soldering, penetrant inspection, leak detection, etc., are determined and docucented in accordance with Quality Directive 9 1, "E=ployee skill Certification." 3.8 Inspection The quality Operations Department Manager reports directly to the President of the Company as noted in Section 2.0. This ar-rangement establishes a quality Control activity that ic separate from the func tional departments and provides a direct line of ec=cun-ication with upper management. The quality Control function is con-trolled by established procedures as defined in this document and the Quality Manual (ES-265). This ennual is made up of a nucber of qual-i i ity Directives which delineate the procedures used by the quality Operations Depart =ent in conoucting inspection and control functions. These directives are subjected to periodic audits in accordance with a the requirements of Quality Directive 5 3 The established procedures require that a quality Certifica-tion log is used in the accumulation of the inspection history and shows the acceptance status of the various cceponents and subasse=- blies contained therein. This log also contains the direction for mandatory inspection peints, and the recorded results as appropriate. 10 90005210

~. Non-conforming parts or packages will be identified, tagged, and phys ( ically iepounded, where practical, until written disposition by proper authority is received. 39 Test Control When a test program is required to deconstrate that an ite= or component will perfor= satisfactorily in service, a test procedure will be documented, reviewed and approved in accordance with the " Engineering Documentation Standards." The applicable t est results will be documented, evaluated and their acceptability determined by J their =eeting specified acceptance criteria, or they may be evaluated by the Division or Engineering Manager in the case of development tests. 3.10 Control o f Measurine and Tes t Iqui =ent A manufacturing and inspection equip ent calibration and certification progra= will be maintained in accordance with quality Directive 7.1, " Standards and Calibration," in order to schedule the I calibration of inspection and test equipment used for determination l of product acceptability. 3.11 Handline, Storare and Shippine The Design and Test C-roup of the Centra Engineering Section \\ will generate special procedures, as required, for handling, storage, cleaning, preservation and shipping of components and asseeblies. If necessary, these procedures will include criteria for those iters requir-ing special protective environments such as inert gas atmosphere, special moisture content levels or temperature li=itations. Routine handling, storage and shipping procedures are defined in tne Manufacturing Depart-ment Procedures Manual. (~ 90005211 11

4 3 12 Inspection, Test and Operatine Status Established procedures will be used for maintaining trace-ability and inspection status (acceptance, or rejection) and required test status of items used in the product. The traceability and status of the product is verified through the use of a quality Certification Log wi.ich accompanies the related hardware through each step of its assembly and test. The log is basically a quality plan that estab-lishes the data collection and inspection require =ents, in sequence, for the completed product. / 3 13 "on-Conforming Materials, parts, er Cocconents Established procedures, as defined in the quality Manual will be used for identifying, and docucenting discrepancies, cegre-gating the hardware and withholding from use until authorined written disposition instructions are received. The responsible project engi-i neer or his designee may disposition hardware as " return to supplier," " rework to specifi:ation," or " scrap." Dispositions of "use as is," or " repair," however, are additicnally subjected to custcmer approval prior to implementation when specified by the contract s p eci fica tio ns. J.lk Corrective Ac tion \\ The responsibility of the project Engineer is to determine the cause of the discrepant event, and conduct or reco cend special investigations and corrective actions as appropriate to preclude rep-itition of the event. Copies of the released nonconformance report (RS Tag) are distributed to appropriate individuals for infor:ation and appropriate action. 90005212 .-b 12

t 3 15 Quality Assurance Racords t quality Assurance Records for the produc.t will be maintained throughout the service life of the product. These records will in-clude design definition records (drawings, specifications, procedures, etc.); purchase orders plus appropriate test and ' material certifica-tions; Quality inspec tion, acceptance, control, skill certification and audit records. Micro film copies =ay be employed for record re-tention at the discretion of Teledyne Energy Systems. l 3 16 Audits of Quality Assurance Blan Compliance to this Quality Assurance Plan will be assessed by a team of three individuals approximately ence per year. The team j members will be selected from service groups within the company - typi-cally from Central Engineering, Materials Engineering and Test, and Quality Operations. The audit will be conducted, using this plan, or a specially prepared check list as a procedure. Results of the audit t will be reported to Management along with recommended corrective actions for noted deficiencies. Records of audit results will be maintained by the quality Operations Department in accordance with established procedures. \\ 90005213 be 13 i

1 I~ t I l i APPE!! DIX I i I i j / Applicable Quality Directives 90005214

e

= \\ A 1 /% __m_ _ _ _ -, _ m-- m

TABLE OF CCMTI?:TS Title M. Revision Preparation of quality Directives 1.1 B Configuration Control 2.1 C Teledyne Isotopes Reporting System 33 B Quality Control of Energy Syste=s Division 34 C Fabrication Material quality Control of Procured Material 3.6 B Periodic Internal Quality Audits 53 B Ut..ization of Liaison Call Sheet 5.4 A Quality Planning 55 C Standards and Calibration 7.1 C Procure =ent Documents - quality Pequire=ents 8.1 C Employee Skill Certification 91 I Inspection Stamps 10.1 C o s 90HD05215 A - 2

TR Q [ ! O fi j y V in m p l I V L "/PTEL"iDYME Wlb-u a I UshCJ ISOTOPES 1\\ LEE: ( PREPARATION OF QUALITY DIRECTIVES 0;P:CuvE t.0 REV ORIGINATED Bf 1.1 E R. P. Wathen REVISiL"527"IE REVISED BY. 11/ 72 R. P. Bruno ORIGU, t SS } ME REYlEWED BY FACE i Of APPROVED T 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summarv_ Tids document establishes the requirements governing the preparation, approval, issuance, and revision of Quality Directives. 1.2 Purpose Quality Directives shall be used to document the Quality System established by Telodync Isotopes, Energy Systems Division I 1.3 Reforcnce ? N This directive is authorized by ESD Quality Procedures 1.0 " Procedures" i l and 5. 0 " Quality Enginecring. " 2. RESPONSIBILITIES i 2.1 Quality Encineering Quality Engineering shall be responsible for the issuance, coordination, i and revision of Quality Directives. The originating or revising engineer i is responsible for training personnelin the use of the Directive and its implementation. 3. REQUU1EMEh"rS 3.1 General Content In general, Quality Directives shall establish administrative instructions ] required for efficient operation of a quality assurance system designed to The Directives l support the design and manufacturing effort of the Division. shall describe in sufficient detail the quality assurance methods implemented j to meet customer requirements. 3.2 Text Arrancement To the ma:dmum extent practical Quality Directives shall be prepared in an Quality Directives sh:dl be arranged in a i orderly and logical arrangement. prescribed format so that users may expand minimum effort to locate needed ~ Quality Directives shall be prepared in four basic sections, as 4 1 information. follows: 90005216

QD 1.1 B Page 2 11/22/72 { (a) Section 1. SCO E P (b) Section 2. RESPONSIBILITIES (c) Section 3. REQUIRE 31ENTS (d) Section 4. NOTES /APPENDD: SCOPE - Section 1. shall contain brief statements that Section 1. 3.2.1 provide a clear and concise abstract of the coverage of the Quality Directive. A typical outline of Section 1. follows: 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summary 1.2 Purpose

1. 3_

References The Stunmary statement should sitmmarize the intent or end result 3.2.1.1 accomplished by the execution of the Quality Directive. The 'Ptrpose statement shottld define the need for the Quality Directive. 3.2.1.2 Reference should be made to the contractual requirement, company policy or other requirement establishing the need for the Quality Directivo. s The Reference statement should refer to the Quality Procedure that 3.2.1.3 authorizes the issuance of the Quality Directive. Section 2. RESPONSIBILITIES - Section 2. of Quality Directives 3.2.2 shall be used to describe departmental recponsibilitics for activitics defined by the Quality Directives. When Quality Directives define responsibilitics of departments other than Quality, Quality Engineering should coordinate with the Manager of the affected department. REQUIREMENTS - All essential requirements and descriptions 3.2.3 Section 3. shall be stated in this scetion. Each paragraph shall be numbered and titled, and may have as many subparagraphs as uccessary to accurately and completely describe cach aspect of the requirement. 3.2.4 Section 4. NOTES / APPENDIX - This section shall contain information of a general or explanatory nature. No requirements shall appear herein to accomplish the scope of the Quality Directive. When necessary, definitions and figures shall be contained in Section 4. L' ) 900052g .,.,a

1 QD 1.1 B Page 3 {. 11/22/72 3.3 Preparation Initiation - Quality Engineering shall be responsible for initiation and 3.3.1 coordination of new and revised Quality Directives. Format - Preferably, Quality Directives shall be prepared in accordance 3.3.2 with tbc format exhibited in tids document. 1. SECTION 1.1 Paragraph This paragraph.... 1.1.1 Subparacraph - This subparagraph... has been..... 1.1.1.1 These statanents under a subparagraph are: (a) Separate (b) Short (c) Concise ~ 3.3.3 Forms Page 1 of Quality Directives shall be printed on Form NSD-22 and shall . 3.3.3.1 be completed as specified in Table I. TABLE I. INSTRUCTICt:5 FOR COMPLETICM OF FORM NsD-22 Block Instructions \\ subject Assigned by Quality Engineering a Originated By Originator's Typed Name l ~ I Revised By. . Revisor's Typod Name i i Revicwed Dy Quality Engineering Supervisor, Signature Approved flanager, Quality operations, Signaturc 1 l Directive Number Assigned by Quality Engincoring Revision Letter Letter Decignation (starting with A for original) ,y ) Revision,Date Assigned by Quality Engineering ) original Issue Date Date Directive Initially Publinhed i 90005218

i Q, QD 1.1 B Page 4 11/22/72 3.3.3.2 Pages 2 through the final page shall be identified by: (a) QD Number and Revision Letter (b) Page Number (c) Latest Revision Date 3.3.4 Approval - Final approval of Quality Directives shall be by the l Manager, Quality Operations. 3.4 Revision Procedure 3.4.1 General - Quality Directives shall be periodically reviewed, and when ] necessary revised (re-issued), keeping current with company needs and l industry trends. Recommendations are desired for improvements to Issued Quality Directives. Comments should be forwarded to Quality Engineering. j 3.4.3 Change Control - Changes to Quality Directives shall consist of complete O,. re-issue of existing Quality Directives. When one page of a Directive j is revised, the complete Directive shall be. assigned the next revision letter. Changes may contain editorial corrections, technical changes, or both. To assist the user of the Quality Directive in locating these changes, a block bar may be used to identify the location of the change on the,page. '3. 5 Distribution Distribution of new or revised Quality Directives shall be accomplished when required. 3.5.1 Quality Manuals - Quality Manuals which include all Quality Procedures and Directives shall be controlled and distributed by Quality Engineering in accordance with a Quality Manual IIolders list approved by the Manger, g Quality Operations. 3.5.2 Quality Directives - Revised Quality Directives shall be distributed upon release to all holders of a current Quality Manual. A current listing of all Quality Directives shall be published periodically and distributed for insertion in the Quality Manuals. 3.6 Quality Directive Familiarization Quality Directives are Quality Assurance System documents and as such O shatt be uuderstood aad proverir used by alt affected versouuel. i 3.G.1 New Directives - New directives shall be implemented b. an informal ) training session for all using personnel in the Quality Opciations 4 - Department including Quality Engineers, inspectors and Supervisors. Any questions concerning a Directive should be directed to the originator of the Directive. . n- _. ~ 90005219

.a .2. ;.= : :.:. QD 1.1 B Page 5 11/22/72 (, Revised Directives _ - Directives which have been revised shall be read 3.6.2 and understood by the Manual holders. A training session may be used to explain important revisions. Any questions concerning a revised Itevised directive should be directed to the Revisor of that directive. directives shall be disseminated under a cover letter indicating the new directive revision and the old directive (s) to be replaced or destroyed. ~ Revision Control _ - A Revision Control Index, Form NSD 43, Figure 1, 3.G.3 shall be inserted in the front of each Quality Manual indicating the .r.ev.ision status of all directives in the manual. 3.7 '~ Quality Directive Audit Quality Engineering shall audit each Quality Directive periodically. ~ This audit shall include review of format and content for conformance to current requirements and cpecifications and to determine whether the directive is being impicmented and used effectively. If deviations exist, revision of the directive or correction of implementation methods Will be accomplished. ' Government Coordination 3.8 huality Directives and all revisions may be coordinated with the local Government Representative by Quality Engineering, when required by contract. D""D "D 9)~

NOTES /A PPENDIX

9. f w

a .1. 4. 4.1 Ficure I Figure 1..- Quality Manual Revision Control Index, Form NSD-43. o 1 .c .,.. r. '*-et. u .' c. .. = uy.o. .-w .;r-

s. t.,. - -....

N w..; t ,s. cm.,.. c...,...o. ....... c.. s.... ~ e g,.y. n.. y....s ..m g"' Ds d. ' '.

i:'eni

~.: .:it..q

s. I '..

. ;3 l... J. ~ ~900'05'220 ~ ~ .. ~ - ..... ~... .r.r_.y. r

QD 1.1 B Face 6 11/22/72 ( 1 WTELEDYNE QUAlliY HAHUAL REVISION CONTROL INDEX ISOTOPES REVI510tl DATE L PUREGSt iht ;;f:c:a et :nis Atysien (catr2! ir:ts is to cr Ca a means cf teettc'hng : tac;is to the Cga'.it Manual and :c irc.:ste 13 re:e*: s:stus :! the c::tmests in the muJl

2. POsitNG Pers:enal g:stic; inis ledia and Revsiers :terrio see:'d reis and ta'e es:e noit I any i

char;ts in the new cr rtrsed c:cumeni tefore :csoa;- Quality Per:ene:1. onIy. are recuired to stat:al 13e Rea: Sv i:::k Th's Inden sha't te es:'s:td **eaever a new incei s ;uttisted ard : sied All

3. USi -

dCtuf* fels he;! in ;he $.f a*Lal t e:! aq'et Asih th! la'.tst ;0stej.4et s:Cn C;nir3I Indli h and the Revisiens cessed intre.n Essing or revise: d:cuments can te atta ned from Ouahty Eca neering r OAff POSifD THIS INDEX F0STED BY New or Revised ait nered by l') tiSil'40 CF CURP.E'JT 00Cu'.tE'i!S Posted Rea1 Pes:ehrt of Re.is on "U Til,e g, g, Direct:ve 'la Oste l l s s I I 'J ) y 45c 43 Figure 1. Quality Manual Revision Control Index 90005221 l

!E P>1 f\\l'Tif N'Qil"?"! I V L "/PTELEDYME bLJ d NL 5I ISOTOPES IIIll: CONFIGURATION CONTROL UiRECiliE NO REV ORIGU.,UED 2f. 2.1 C J. K. Wenderoth (QD 2. 001) REWD 80 11/22/72 J. K. Wenderoth ORiGmAL 15SLE CW \\hd 2/2/70 ~) REY:E'.'.E D gy' nGE I0F 5 / APPROVED I PMw v m

1. 0 SCOPE 1.1 Summarv This directive defines a method for recording and documenting drawing and

/ specification changes applicable to deliverable end items. 1.2 Purpose To assure that cach delivered end item is traceable back to the drawings and specifications defining it, and to assure that the effectivity of changes is properly applied to cach deliverable end item. 1.3 Reference Quality Procedure 2.0, " Drawings and Specifications. " n. s s 2. RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Engineering Engineering is responsible for the preparation of drawings and specifications, and for subsequent changes including assigmnent of effectivity. 2.2 Administration i Administration is responsible for proper distribution of released drawings, specifications, and changes and for the maintenance of files containing all non-obsoleto drawings, specifications and changes. I 2.3 Quality Entineering l f Quality Engineering is responsible for the maintenance of a Configuration Record i documenting the effectivity of drawing and specification changes. l 2.4 Quality Control Quality Control is responsible for verifying product compliance with drawing y j and specification requirements. 2.5 ).laterial Control Subject to effectivity designations, Material Control is responsible for assuring that in-process and stoched items are upgraded to the appropriate change level. a lj 90005222 t

QD 2.1 C Page 2 11/22/72 C; 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Quality Encineering. Upon receipt of released technical documentation covered by an Engineering Job Sheet, Quality Engineering will perform the following activities: Conficuration Record _ - Prepare new or update existing Configuration Record 3.1.1 Card (Figure 1) for each drawing or specification. 3.1. 2 ' Reference Files - File copies of each released Drawing Chan:;c Notice in the Quality Engineering reference file and in each Quality Control reference book. File Engineering Job Sheets in numerical order in the Quality / Engineering reference file. Out-of-sequence Engineering Job Sheet ntunbers indicate missing job sheets and changes. Obsolete Documentation - Remove obsolete drawings from Quality Engineering 3.1.3 Reference file. Certification Loc _ - The following steps shall be followed for fabricated iten$s 3.1.4 requiring a Certification Log. Preparc a Configuration Record - Record of Assembly (CR-ROA) (Figure 2) 3.1.4.1 Q she et for each Certification Log. The CR-ROA shall list all special design items called out in the list of materials of the applicable assembly drawing. Check thc Configuration Record card file for each drawing listed on the CR-ROA 3.1.4.2 sheets and enter applicabic changes on the CR-ROA sheets. 3.1.4.3 Prepare and maintain a Certification Log Record identifying logs originated, change level, and date of issue. 3.1.4.4 Eten engineering changes are released after an affected Certification Log i has been issued, locate the issued logs in the shop and update their CR-ROA \\ sheets. When necessary, Quality Chech Sheets in logs must be updated to record new/ additional variables data or to certify special inspection activities. 3.2 Quality Control Quality Control shall maintain product inspection reference files including up-to-date drawings and specifications. During product inspection by Quality Control, documentation relative to configuration control will be processed in accordance with the following activities. ~ Non-Certification Loc Items - Product inspection is to be accomplished in i 3.2.1 accordance with the drawing and specification requirements contained in Shop I l.i Folders. iV 90005223 l l l

QD 2.1 C Pa e 3 ( 11 2/72 3.2.1.1 Verify the configuration Icvel of the part by comparing the shop fc f.er with the current drawing. 3.2.1.2 Record the change level to which the part has been inspected on the piece part acceptance tag. 3.2.1.3 Piece parts found not to latest configuration level are to bu 2eturned to Material Control for rework or processed as nonconforming hardware as directed by Quality Directive 3.4. 3.2.1.4 The acceptance tag shall be updated or replaced when previously accepted piece parts have been reworked and reinspected to a higher configuration level. 3.2.2 Certification Loc Itemr,- Product inspection is to be accomplished in accordance with the dr wing, specification, and Quality Check Sheet requirements contained in the Certification Log. 3.2.2.1 Transfer recorded configuration data of piece part acceptance tag to applicabic log CR-ROA sheet. { 3.2.2.2 Verify compliance with additional posted changes on CR-ROA sheet by comparison with the current file drawing and apply acceptance stamp and date in appropriate inspection block. 3.2.2.3 When inspected to a Certification log, hardware found not to latest configuration level is to be processed as nonconforming hardware as directed by Quality Directive 3.4. 3.2.3 Obsolete Hardware - Upon receipt of obsolete hardware, with applicable Engineering direction, Quality Control is to confiscate the obsolete hardware within the Quality Withholding Area and process it in accordance with Quality s Directive 3.5.

3. 3 Material Control Upon receipt of DCN's or incorporated drawing changes delineating obsolete or updated hardware items, Material Control will perform the following activitics.

3.3.1 Obsolete Hardware - Remove obsolete hardware from stockroom / production areas and submit to Quality Control with applicable Engineering direction. 3.3.2 Reworkable Hardware - When a drawing or specification chance permits the rework of hardware, the item may be reworked by issuance of a shop folder C and resubmitted to Quality Control for inspection to the higher change level. 900052-24

4 9 QD 2.1 C Page 4 { ~ 11/22/73 4. APPENDIX 4.1 Figures Figure I, Configuration Record Card Figure 2, CR-ROA Sheet / i 2 b ~ ~ 90005225 4 e 4 I 9 .-.-....=s O e S ~ (' h.,. s.. I

7 QD 2.1 C Page 5 11/22/72 SIZE DWG. HEXT NC. ASSEM. TITLE PRQY kSS TICKET RELEASED RELEASL REVtSiON NAME DATE NUMBER TO LETTER Figure 1. Configuration Record Card ccur:cm::::: n:aa - ne:s: cr Assc<s:.: Configuration Status Drawing & Part No. Ruan.I tot /3 stet / lNoriconfereageel ) [Se r. No./P.C. l Petorts l l l I f ^' l l I I s I i I l I I I l I I t I i 6 i i I v I I ss. o. ,,,,. 1. .. m ..... 1...., rigurc 2. Cn-nos snect 90005226

09 SJ1"9f DS P TM(C "/PT' !.EDYPE ISOTOPES lbnt ll I buikbUiVl-TifLE: C TELEDYNE ISOTOPES REPORTING SYSTEM CiHttil.E NO REV ORIGINA!ED BY 3.3 D W. Rowo REVIS.03 OME i REVISED BY. 5/1/72 A. M. Konjura OR.Gmat ISSUE CME REVIEnED Bf V \\);T 5/21/G0 bl \\Q,2 Q FAGE I Of /) / 5 AFFROVED \\ N ., l. Y T I'? T % - g 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summary This directive provides the requirements to be met in completing the Tcledyne Isotopes Reporting System Tag, Form No. NSD-16 (5-71).

1. 2 Purpose To define required documentation for reporting nonconforming items.

1. 3 References Quality Procedurc 3.0, " Material Control"

( a.

b. Quality Procedure 6.0, " Data and Reports" s

2. RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 All Departments Report incidences of nonconformance by completing the section of the Reporting System (RS) Tag which is enclosed within the heavy black border (Section "A" of Fig.1) and forwarding the tag to Quality Control. [

2. 2 Quality Control l

Quality Control will be responsible for verifying the proper completion of section "A" of the Reporting System Tag. Upon completion of Section "A," ,j Quality Control will forward the RS tag to Quality Engineering. ll

2. 3 Quality Encincerint Quality Engineering will be responsible for the proper completion of the I

section of the Reporting System tag which is not enclosed by the heavy 1 black border (Section "B" of Fig.1). Upon completion of the RS tag, Quality Engineering will distribute copies and file the master. 1 6 I 90005227 B $' Y l% ; '}

Q D. 3. 3 B Page 2 5/1/72 ( 3. REQUIRESIENTS I Individuals Responsible for Completion of the RS Tag 3.1 Initiator - The individual initiating the RS tag will complete all items in 3.1.1 Section "A" of the RS tag with the exception of the following:

a. Quality Supervisor's signature

b. Quality 3Ianager's signature

c. Acknowledgement signature

~ Quality Control Suncrvisor - The Quality Control Supervisor will be 3.1.2 responsible for obtaining the signatures noted in 3.1.1 above and for forwarding the RS tag to Quality Engineering for disposition. Quality Enaineering_ - Quality Engineering will be responsible for 3.1.3 completing Section "B" of the RS tag, including obtaining the Quality Manager's signature for approval of the final disposition. ( 3.2 Data Required for Completion of the RS Tag Type of Data _- The type of data required to complete the RS tag is explained 3.2.1 by the bloch headings on the tag and/or the instructions on the reverse side of the hard copy of the RS tag. The following four block headings may require further clarification. " Initial Ept. No." is used to show the serial number of existing RS tags

3. 2.1.1 against the item currently being rejected and directly related to the discrepancy in question.

" Item"is used to differentiate between different types of defects when an 3.3.1.2 Each RS tag is used to record rejections for more than one reason. rcJection reason should have a different item number and should be correlated with part serial munbers in the " Description of Event" section of the tag. " Total Qty." is used to represent the total number of parts in the inspection 3.2.1.3 lot. " Qty. Defect" is used to represent the total number of defective parts.

3. 2.1. 4 6

) 90005228 io -o 1i

Q. D. 3. 3 D Page 3 5/1/72 (

3. 3 Supplementary Forms RS Supplemental Pace. Form No. NSD-15 (5-71) - The RS Supplemental 3.3.1 Page (Fig 2) will be used as a continuation sheet for data which cannot be included on the face of the RS tag because of length.

Corrective Action Board Renort. Form No. NSD-13 (5-71) - A Corrective 3.3.2 Action Board iteport (Fig. 3) will suppleinent tne its tag when the final disposition of a nonconformance is made by the Corrective Action Board rather than Quality Engineering. .4, NOTES / APPENDIX 4.1 Figures Figure 1 - Tcledync Isotopes Reporting System Tag, Form No. NSD-1G (5-71) ) Figure 2 - Teledyne Isotopes Reporting System Supplemental Page, Form No. NSD-15 (5-71) Figure 3 - Toledync Isotopes Corrective Ac:itn Board Report, Form No. NSD-13 (5-71) (v 90005229 m E F a 1 5 l l ) i i 1 } l

t Q. D. 3 03B i.. Pago 4 5/1/72 ^ 9 S/N sus m< g..,... g...... m. ";7 T Et EOYf JE 1 u ne a pi. g(W ISO 10 PES . w e.-- mrie px;r.., gy g.gt;r 4.nmw g a r.rnn eos. w,;q;,,,, i ..m.w,.aw-p U-T1 i i f,.s. .2 7 o O -- 2act,.1.a -- t. r. 5 ~ w.n, E

i.

u.,, m.. .e . 2rma e t B-ff 8 -) o J. i G . 3,0. i.s, -..... a.s xmen aJ a.mm rvrnarre.m.mT,na mm.auma..xo

c. u in d,3 e amu saca a n 2 a.a c.v.

Fig. 1. Teledync Isotopes Reporting System Tag .L').3 ~. 1..: F3 '/?1 EL EDY?,'E

* *'*"3 li 3,

IsolopEs rw aan 3 ex:m nm .) 9. s s.. 1h .a81 I l ',' W

1.

oi, mu i...,, ,, ) .m. i.c. w si o r.... u....is o ts tsin m,.o..i e r,. e,......... s n.. .,, s.a .ii Fig. 3. Telcdync Isotopes Reporting System Supplemental Page 1 7 i 900b5230

Q. D. 3.3 D Page 5 5/1/73 ( i '/?TELEr'n!2 ,$ so, ISOTOPES PARf h0. (022iGN1 LG10H 601:0 GCRI Pact' or j r 9 r. \\ s. 9 CAB DISPo$ltlCN AFFROVAL DAI[ I CC$1CN (NCINEIR RCt1 A B11ITY IN0tNtIR QUAL !!Y INOINCIR CU$10:.'.LR K$3.l3 ($.))) IN51RUCT10%$ (CR ti![ PREPAR Atl0N OF THIS FOR'.t CN tt'.'tRiE SICE. d Fig. 3. Tcledyne' Isotopes Corrective Action Board Report.

C 1

90005231 l i

9PTELEi?/ME O'l E D' E, Th"'t.f E i..T""D.!/C w': E m 6 tm. s a # i Dgw t

- i a

r; ~' ':,, u...n u' ,. r s-a v,i J st,d hfLt: J l. QU/,I.ITY CONTROL OF ENERGY SYSTEI,'.S D;VDION TAERIC/. TION :.' TER14L LlhtClat tid. 6f. ' ses. .e O"uCl?.AllQ i,f: 7 A r vu. + 3,... Rivis100 CAli s., E,mc n. 9/5/7,1 L. Siccrist '#'*

C'*

"'IU U gj ),g, g74771 UGE i 0 . 4 j O, /4 Qg.'., cneg IJ.wt D. g N o l 1-SCOPE ~ 1.1 Summary i i Thir directive pro / ides guidelinos for the f.!cw ced Quality docu:uen'.n!!cu of co:darridir; and nea-confurndwg h.'.d.v.'are I.:.'.;riaatcd, pr eccsed aua @d in-hcr *;c.

1. P, Per onc Thc i,rcper execulien of this directive assures the completo quality control I.,

of pro.1. action m1Lerh:1 ac recluired by conf. rect and ::tandr.rd Quality prr.ctice.

1. 3 Reference Quality Procedurc 3.0, "Meterial Control" a.

b. Quality Procedurc 5.0, " Quality Engincerin;" 2. REf1PONSI2ILITIES / 2.1 Qualitv En2ineering . Quality En;;!ncering chall preparc inspection inciructions, cv:duate defcets, failures and othc r unomalies, and dicposilica material in accordance with procedures herein prescribed or which c.re contractually required. i

2..S OnWiv Cdrol Quality Control shall inspect to drawings, specifications, or specific instructions, and aball document actions, ::nd carry out the disposition of

)' materi:d as directed below. r. (,) 3. REQ ~WRGl.t!.NTS 90005232 i

.1 o n n.. c m.o. 2 f. c -

4 I Quality Control per;:enrel sh511 I:n pect parts.v.d unkrial 10 he app %': le drawing, specificatic.a or inetruction in accordance with the ahop folder and

Q.'D,' 3. 4 C Page 3 i 9/5/74 ( ~ 3.1 maho a detertaination of ceuformance or non-codformanec. All items inspected will be identided and documented as retiutred and defined hercin. 1 3.1.1 Conformirg_Ilardware - Conforming parts and assemblics shall bc dccumented as follo.?s: 3.1.1.1 Upon completlou of inspection of bordware the inspector shall clear the Manufacturing Order by placing his " inspection stamp in the " Final" block of the Manufacturing Order (Figure 1). The date should be entered, r. and the number of acceptable parts entered in the " Accept" bloch. 3.1.1. 2 When operations licted on the Manufacturing Order (M.O.) are completed and parts are acceptable, the inspector shall initiate a Material Acceptance Tag (Figure 3), stamp and attach or place coropleted tag with parts. 3.1.1. 3 PUc tic 3rd, er green espy of the completed M.O. by part number in the Qnality Contrcl File. 3.1.1. 4 When r.dditio.nl operations c.rc required by the "M.O." or englucering drawing nivir.an inspection such as: Cleaning,13ahc out, lerJt test '( ) etc.; the detr.ila of the c_ofwlc,tpd increctiona veill bc briefly duccrib:d h the "Ocucrcl NotcL" Ocut!en of tho"M.O." followed by the tuspector's otamp. s 3.1.1. 5 When subsequent operaticas as deceribed in 3.1.1.4 are to be performed r.fter an inspection, the top half of the I.'aterial Acceptance Tag (Figure 3) chcll be inittsted by the inopcetor und stamped under the "Q.C." in the ,tc2 part of tha' tag only. a 3.1.1. 6 Upon successful completion of the subsequent operations required to complete the "M.O.", the inspector shall stamp the appropriate "Q.C," block (c) in the bottom portion ci the M=crial Acceptance Tag, (rigure 3) and complete the M. O. per 3.1.1.1 and 3.1.1. 3. 4 3.1.1. 7 When inspecting a part which has a Quality Log, cicar the Quality Log by . Stamping and dating the completed, acceptabic operations. Etamped Acceptance Tags for all parts and suhansemblice are to be posted tu the Quality Leg for cach major as:cmbly or end item at the time of the appropriate assembly inspection. Include in the Quality Log any required .j variables data. 4 , s 3.1.1. S Forward "Incompleic" Quality Logs wPh the pa'rts to Material Control for (,) subscquent operatienc. 90005233 - 0 - -. - _ - ~ w

~ Q. D. 3. 4 C Page3 9/5/4 (, When finalinr.pcetion and acceptance is completeri, check the Quality Lc; 3.1.1. 0 and :,acp ic cer for veritica:r.;n of comps.uca of sil operauend, in:;;cetion.4 Forward the completc Quality Log package to Quality Engineering and touts. fr review and retentien. when the item in a completed part, subjc at to customnr acceptance by 3.1.1.10 contract requirement, submit the part to the Customer Itepresentative Upon his acceptance, obtain customer stamp on the for his review. Acccptance Tag and the customer's signa:e.re on other documentation required by contract. Nen-Conformir Mcwhvnre - Perts or usemblien which arc foutr' during 3.1. 3 int:pertion to b., defcet'.vc er non-corJoemin; shall he proccesed in a manner vzhich w:.U prc-vide recoph.'s heumanMica cif L'ia occurrence.ad removal cil';c r on-co:Cormir.3 iMm 'mm acceptabM pro.'u:'.i.ca rnatcrial. IIca-conformirc parts require the initiatian q! a lleporting Systen (RS) Tag, 3.).2.) The inrpector shell comp,lete the top brJ' of 1,hc RS Tag, MSD-10 (Figure 4). defin!rg the part and the non-conformance, and: . l)

n. 'Obitin tho QualP.y Cen'. col Super &or'c cicnnture.

b. The Quality Control Supervisor will obtain the Quality Manager's n!Cnnturo.

l t.

c. The QuulHy Control Dupervisor vrill then obtain the Mannincturing L anac,ur's (or his repre;cntative) ndnature in the Acknoveletm nt

( block and give him the goldenred copy of the RS Tag.

d. The wbite and green ecpics are to be forwarded to Quality Engineering a

{ for cycluation of the r.on-confo.rmance cud dispacition of the item (s). i-Atttch io er place the hardbach copy of the RS Tag with the questionabit t c. part or nesembly and put them in the Quality Withohling Area to await renolution by Quality Engineering and further dispecition inctructions.

f. Carry out. (H.rpocition instructionn upon receipt of a completed, approve !

In the case of SCR.\\P items, Quality Engineering copy of the US Tag. will handle the parts in accordance with Q.D. 3.5. t I '\\ ( / 90005234 %o t

Q. D. 3 4 C Page 4 9/5/4 3 1.2.1

g. When dispositien has been cocpleted to " Repair" or "Use as is" and the item is accepted, process per Faragraph 31.1 and stamp the back of the hardback copy of the RS Tag.

Cbtain the Custc=er Representative's stamp, when reouired, in the space provided, date the Tag and forward it to quality Engineering. 32 Quality Engineering Action Quality Engineering personnel shall receive all PS Tags, j review discrepancies, deter =ine cause, propoce corrective action and make an init'ial disposition (Rework / Scrap /Fe fer to Corrective Action Board). The RS Supplement Form, NSD-15 ) (Figure 5), may be utilized for documenting cause and suggested f corrective action. i Rework - When rework action will correct the de fect, detail 3 2.1 the method of rework and process the RS Tag as follows:

a. Co=plete RS Tag, obtain proper authorizing signatures and distribute xerox copies to:

Corrective Action Board Material Control Originator Others as required by program

b. Upon co=ple tion of rework and acc eptance, the RS Tag hard copy will be stamped oy quality Control and returned to Quality Engineerin6 File the RS Tag hard copy and ori inal (white) with attached data and supple =ents 5

Scrap - When rework cannot be acec=plished or item is damaged 3 2.2 and otherwise unusable, it will be scrapped. Proceed as z follows: \\

a. Complete RS Tag and indicate:

" Scrap" s

b. Obtain signature of quality Control Supervisor and quality Manager.

c. Remove af fected hardware from Quality Withholding Area and place it in Sonded Scrap Crib. place hardback copy of RS Tag with or attached to the part(s). D 90005235 g e M HO 9 M. 4 e==*= em e ee-o e e- .a em mwe e W - e se. . - m. m..wwm-ee w - h f

4 'Q. D. 3.4 C Page 5 9/5/4 3 2.2 Scrap - (Cont'd) d. Distribute xerox copies of the RS Tag per Paragraph 3 2.1 (a), See Q. D. 3 5 for further se' rap control instructions. e. 3 2.2.1 Items declared " Scrap" by Engineering change shall be con-fiscated and placed in Bonded Scrap Crib after coordination with Material Control. Docueent scrappage on an RS Tag as in Paragraphs (a) and (b) above. 323 Refer to Corrective Action 3 card - Items that are not dis-positioned 'oy J.uality Engineer:ng as " Rework" or " Scrap" shall be submitted to the CA3 for action and disposition. i Upon receipt of CA3 disposition instructions, the Quality Engineer will complete the RS Tag as follows: Obtain signatures of Quality Engineering Supervisor and a. Quality Manager. b. Distribute copies of the RS Tag in accordance with Psra-graph 3 2.1 (a) above. c. Upon completion of disposition instructions, receive the hardbach copy of the RS and file it with the RS original and a copy of the CAS Report, NSD-13 (Figure 6). 4. NOTES /AFPENDIX 4.1 Figures Figure 1 - Manufacturing Crder, For: ESD-209 Figure 2 - Material Acceptance Tag, ISD-33 Figure 3 - Material Acceptance Tcg (large) 4 Figure 4 - Isotopes Reporting System (RS), Form NSD-16 Figure 5 - RS Supple =ent, Form USD-15 e Figure 6 - CA3 Report, For: NSD-13 90005236 l I 4 =

1 ) i g. o, A O mgs^, o o k c O R K H T O S E C ..O C E D A T A L .N E T T J A A MA MT N E D D E T Y. ON O E B R D CE STO I V 7 U S O SM SS A S I AE RPE E C ED /0 1 R T K S S S0CE lI T ? i / N1 S P. C A DCY N E ! E 1 l l8 I 0 SOE O T L O l i G t t[ L l H U l T P P A I l I 4SEMSI L 0 I. E R E S N E AMJ M=W=ASC I C P A I FI T f C N A =

2 8DM=A=RPV l C . T t = R l = U LMJESWMASCO E S O P ? N R O I I 0 N S H T N 0 R U N O E C C ) A R " A O N / GN E I M R L A L PE N P MT M U A OD O C T C D C t T T E Y E i A Q d C D E S T F A D J N A M 0 1 ~ 3 ^ M O R F O N M^ li i O P P S 4 ? S S

o.,

M E T O I S N N R SR! NEio" iln T A E 0 O f L i Efm I E E 0 N A t N R F R N E u G 4ir J P 1 E T is 1 0r P A; O A G Ce O [ gh gN

Q.D. J.

L Page 7 9/5/4 k.

Part No. DCtf Quan. F 'S Q. C.

~*l-v4 r L.....,. u 5 y w s

g.- . (_ ' ; _FLfNo. Sor. No. RS P.O. ND33 Figure 2 Part No. DCN g u... I i / s.' r". Q. C. Quan./~ 7";""-"1 F: .J. yQ ( f, * ] v v7. v,"t.C 'O ("', Qr -~ FL/No. Sor. No. I s RS P.O. CLE A NIN G D AT E MFG GJ PS B AKE CUT. A;R TYPE P 5020C001 OUTG A S.V AC. M ETHO D PSO2OOOCI OUTGAS. TYPE P90200000 LE AIC R AT E' Figure 3 i Y 90005238

. a,

=.. Q.D. 3,4 C .Pa8e 8 9/5/4 S/N 139s4 j )...., 'i?TELED'It:E ih4 rc:. ISOf0*:ES pm. ~ ( ru mr.o EM8T4IhD

[4I AUI $YAUt M4

%YUIf7 ggg*j pg

MI 7,Y' Dif CLKt3fiOECf M I

~ r.tv witt + l i I .a t f i .c. _, m O ~ 0All NMF M es t wrani.4%I i,s try a.3 9 in p.s%s ey 4 3 b4 sif St#MM~04 h.4 6rf auOld 1 1 1 GihA behiA A/t.ilv4 Se it $wWIMPLE MN144414 i 1 wn.r.,cg,.mrmiier.n,rTkn anE.rfs.hs gg l We d')Lt$l $1CL 0F seAEG 5,i44 CsPT fifJ6 ALC1PiAM'l $1Atar$ i 1 ) I l i s s.c. o,. n e..ms, i i, 1 Figure 4 . L. i 'T ELE U,,',N. 5 w ion,a = 4 ISOTCr c ,,,,m, . W334 V101 /- f i i OLAlff 19fil.dts 3Afg 1 9ATA 418184 Pi t' O ua ese ;t*'MTt ED () SIC 3:11tutttG41904 (7,*tIWG f*fifde* 04 ste(s'4 leff \\ 4 Figure a- ) 90005239 l l l l

Q.D. 3. 4 C e9 Pag /4 9/5 9'rEi ct 'r i,' i ISOTOPES PARINO. 6 CORREur E AU 03 E01ED RI;02T I PAGE OF { e k i I l / g r. c. r Materials Engineer CA8 Disr051TICN APPROVAI. CA!I Ot$lCN tNCINttR FlLI ABit t1Y INCINttR ouAt ity tNeistia CUSIO*.'i R R5013 (5 71) isstructiess reR titt retrAR Arie 4 er inis resu es stvtRst sect. Lj Figure 6 Note: *Obtain customer signature when required by contract. 90005240 l

'#TasM QUALTV JDECTIVE ~ TITLE: (~ QUALITY CONTROL OF PROCURED MATERLSL Oth!CilvE NO rity ORIGINAIED BY ,, g g 5/1/72 M. J. Kaplow OR;GR.AL ISSUE DATE REVIE'/.ED Sy ) p FAGE 1 Of jN f r 11 AFPROVED v/. 7. 3'/'mg N 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summary This directive provides guidelines for the flow and Quality documentation of conforming and non-conforming procured material. 1.2 Purpose To assure control and adequate quality documentation of procured material as required by contract and standard quality practice.

1. 3 References

{ Quality Procedurc 3.0, " Material Control." a. l s b. Quality Procedure 5.0, " Quality Engineering. " Quality Procedure 6.0, " Data and Reports." c. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Quality Encineering Quality Engineering shall evaluate defects, failures, and other anomalies \\' concerning procured material, coordinate and resolve problems with vendors, and disposition material in accordance with procedures herein prescribed or which are contractually required.

2. 2 Quality Control Quality Control shall az,pect and process procured materials in accordance with requirements of the purchase orders, drawings, specifications, or special instructions and shall document actions as directed herein.

L 9000524f m

Q. D. 3. 6 B Page 2 h 5/1/72

2. 3 Purchasing Purchasing is responsible for vendor or supplier coordination and liaison and negotiations regarding procured material discrepancies and vendor corrective action.

3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Receiving Inspection Inspection personnel shall inspect parts to verify conformance to the purchase order, applicable drawings, special requirements and specifications, and document the procured material as required and defined herein. 3.1.1 Material Inspection. General - Upon receipt of procured material, parts or equipment, and tour (4) copics of the Receiving Report from Material Control, the inspector will pull the purchase requisition / purchase order l (PR/PO) package from the Receiving Inspection Control File. Upon review of the purchase order, the inspector will obtain any drawings or specifications required to inspect the material and proceed as fol'ows: 3.1.1.1 Check the vendor's packing slip, included data, and certifications for compliance with the purchase order requirements. 3.1.1.2 Inventory and verify that the material is that which is listed en the purchase order and is correctly marked and/or labeled. 1 3.1.1. 3 Note any damage to material caused by shipping. When damage is found, initiato Reporting System Tag (RS) NSD-16 (Fig. 5) and immediately notify Material Control for coordination with the carrier. Note all damage on the RS tag, photograph if necessary, and notify Quality Engineering for a packaging evaluation, if packaging method appears defective, g 3.1.1.4 Physically inspect the material for compliance with the drawings. Use an approved Sampling Plan, when permissible, for large lots of material I (see Quality Directives, Series 4.X). 3.1.1. 5 When required, other inspections, tests and verifications, such as electrical, chemical, x-ray, etc., shall be accomplished as hidicated on the Receiving Inspection Instruction, Form NSD-42 (Fig.1), and stamped off and dated when accomplished. Test and verification data sheets shall be attached to the Receiving Inspection Instruction for filing. 3.1. 2 Conformine Material - When material meets all listed requirements, data will be processed as detailed below. ( 90005242 I

w Q. D. 3.6 B Page 3 h 5/1/72 3.1.2.1 Clear purchase order by entering portinent receiving inspection information, inspection stamp, and date on the four (4) copics of the Receiving Report. 3.1.2.2 Complete the Receiving Inspection Instruction, when applicabic. 3.1.2.3 Clear the Quality Log when the part was sent outside for a controlled operation. Forward the Quality Log to Quality Engineering when complete. When incomplete, forward Quality Log with material to Material Control. 3.1. 2. 4 Make entry on the vendor Receiving Inspection, Form Q-318 (Fig. 3). 3.1.2.5 Forward to Quality Engineering the Quality copy of the Receiving Report with the PO/PR, Certification Test Reports, and attach a signed report copy of the Receiving Inspection Instruction (Report Copy, Fig. ',), when applicable. 3.1.2.0 Prepare an Acceptance Tag (Fig. 4) and attach or place with parts. When required by contract, the Customer Rc presentative will stamp the Acceptance Tag. { 3.1.2.7 Route accepted parts with three (3) copies of the signed-off Receiving Report to Material Control. 3.1.3 Non-Conformine Material - Initiate an RS Tag (Fig. 5) for discrepant procured material, process the RS Tag and material as defined in Quality Directive 3.3 and detailed below, l 3.1.3.1 The Quality Control Supervisor will contact Purchasing and obtain buyer's signature on the RS Tag to signify acimowledgement of the discrepant condition. Submit the goldenrod, copy of the RS Tag to Purchasing, 3.1.3.2 Attach or place the harcicopy of the RS Tag with the discrepant material g-and move the material to Procurement Withholding Area. 3.1.3.3 The white and green copics of the RS Tag are forwarded to Quality Engineering for evaluation of the discrepancy and material disposition. V* 3.1. 3. 4 Quality Control shall transfer discrepant items to Material Control upon receipt of RS Tag instntetions from Quality Engineering. 3.1.3.5 Stamp (accepted material) or sign (rejected material) the hardback copy of the RS Tag to indicate completion of disposition instructions and forward I: it to Quality. Engineering, i...... 6> 90005243 \\ =

<__g. .m Q. D. 3. G B r Page 4 5/1/72 (, l 3.2 Quality Engineering Quality Engineering shall review non-conforming items and, as such, will receive all RS forms, review discrepancies, make disposition, The green copy of the determine cause, and propose corrective action. i RS Tag is immediately filed upon receipt as a record copy while disposition and evaluation is being accomplished utilizing the Master (white) copy. f Documentation Discrepancies - Shortages or errors in documentation, suchi as missing certuications, analyscs, manuals or other data, may be resolve 3.2.1 by initiating a Supplier Corrective Action Request (SCA correction by supplying the corrected or missing document (s) and corrective (Fig. 6 ). / action to be taken to prevent recurrence. Obtain approval signature of the Quality Manager, forward a copy of the SCAR to Purchasing (the buyer) with a Xerox copy of the dispositioned i 3.2.1.1 RS Tag, and place the original of the SCAR with the RS Tag master await action by the vendor. Purchasing shall submit the SCAR to the vendor requesting action and the Q return of the SCAR with the correct documentation to Quality Engineering. 3.2.1.2 Upon receipt of the correct documentation from the vendor, Quality Engineering shall review the documentation and complete the RS Tag mast

3. 2.1. 3 Forward the received vendor documents to Inspection for attachment to 3.2.1.4 the Receiving Report package.

Forward a copy of the completed RS Tag to Inspection for clearance of 3.2.1.5 the material being held. Receive the hardback copy of the RS Tag upon release of the material 1 ~ 3. 2.1. G ' and file it with the RS Tag master. ) Return to Vendor - Material which cannot be accepted without Vendor ~ 3. 2. 2 rework or replacement shall be returned to the Vendor. / Complete the RS Tag and disposition and material to be " Returned to the Vendor." Cause and suggested corrective action may be added when 3.2.2.1 evident. Prepare a Supplier Corrective Action Request (SCAR) (Tig. 6) describing

3. 2. 2. 2 Forward an approved copy of the SCAR to Purchasing along the problem.

A requested reply date shall be applied with a Xerox copy of the RS Tag. commensurate with the nature and criticality of the non-conformance (10-30 days), ) s 90005244' e

Q. D. 3.G B Page 5 0 5/1/72 3.2.2.3 Distribute Xerox copics of the RS Tag to the follawing: Purchasing hiatcrial Control Originator Receiving Quality Control Others as required by program 3.2.2.4 Receive hardback copy of RS Tag upon completion of disposition and file with the RS Tag master. 3.2.2.5 When corrective action (SCAR) is received from the Vendor, review same mid, if accoptable, sign, attach a copy to the original with the RS Tag master, and filo. 3.2.3 Hold Material for Vendor Review - 31aterial to be held awaiting shipping instructions or venuor review shall be kept in the Procurement Withholding Area. 3.2.3.1 Complete RS Tag and SCAR and process as in Paragraph 3. 2. 2.2. 3.2.3.2 At the joint discretion of the Quality Engineer and the Buyer, and with j { the approval of the Manager, Quality Operations, non-conforming materials may be held for a reasonable period (thirty days) in the Procurement Withholding Area for Buyer / Vendor disposition. 3.2.3.3 Upon disposition to have material returned to Vendor, process as in Peragraph 3. 2. 2. 3.2.3.4 At the end of the thirty-day holding period, if the discrepancy has not been resolved because of vendor negligence in reviewing the material, the RS Tag may be dispositioned " Return to the Vendor. " (Process per 3.2.2) ~ 3.2.3.5 When Vendor agrees to repair or scrap material at Vendor expense, process and disposition the RS Tag per Q. D. 3.4, Paragraph 3.2.1 or 3,3,3,..-

3. 2. 3. G Complete RS Tag including disposition instructions and distribute Xerox

' ~ ~ copics per Paragraph 3. 2. 2. 4 Include copics of the completed SCAR with each RS Tag.

3. 2. 3. 7 Receive the hardback copy of the RS Tag upon completion of the disposition of material and file it with the RS Tag master.

-'~

3. 2. 3. 8 File the Receiving Report package in the Purchase Order Control File.

( ~- 90005245

Q.D. 3.6 B Page 6 5/1/72 f 4. NOTES / APPENDIX 4.1 Notes Non-conforming items which cannot be placed in the Withholding Area or Bonded Scrap Crib because of size, thermal and/or radiation characteristics, etc., may remain in any other safe location provided the RS Tag is prominently displayed. Items of this type are to be dispositioned expeditiously to minimize the amount of time that discrepant items are held outside of a bonded area. 4.2 Tigures = Figure 1 - Receiving Inspection Instruction, NSD -42 Figure 2 - Receiving Inspection Instruction Continuation Sheet, NSD -42A Figure 3 Vendor Receiving Inspection Record, Form Q-318 Figure 4 Acceptance Tag { Figure 5 Reporting System Tag, NSD-lG Figurc 6 - Supplier Corrective Action Rcquest, NSD-17 90005246 9 5 9 emoe-e.m w..

9. 1 Q. D. 3,6 B 8 I, Page 7 5/1/72 '/PTELEDYNE ""um um inTaa nen ISOTOPES m un urca? rAa? n:a u

u:atiT:es i

F2R:4 A5;; CNDE..A $ 3:::t: Vin.<a CAT $ F AAt Snt ) STS.;. ; AL Ar4J1:<Ct!.*;7:3 - 01I0X Ahi LI:A>".3 d!C043 ( l'- r-4! .) l l' .%. :..s...... 5 - .o ...s G o,....: < i {' ,'r' G :.

a

.t <4 4;y. s i .. :5 N.T $te. i I ')-

r.

1 :s

-g7 f

4a1 iliL.: t 4.

wl. (4.. l h Isa Ave es regaare, cert.e:asacas or 4 :a to essare c:s:c r n.:e sa:n req 41rese.ts. We ri fy by Ladica ting "T;3" er "'!aC'* in V T i!f.aloss. 8 SPu!A1, "M!.WJ:T!C:iSs )

' "; = -

.:,::.rm::T ea ouc emA:na::s 7:.:.n r:T

r...<. -

s 4 I 2 1 5 P r, l ? f *' s, e e e .i" 553 4 (c/71) ~ ~ 5 Inspected Sy ,ht, d. Figure 1 t. 1 0 e I RECE1VI:iG IN;rE*T;;;f 1:'37230ni XS (UALITT RIFCRT i ecswrn:te r sg r? - p ag; ; ;,s.3 g

E3

R I FTIC:I 8 L *. *.'s r ; ' '.A

-/ d ;;,5;i.::T::T C A G43E .d ..... l. c. C3 A,t A, .d.T., ~.=>.., lr. 4 i ... ~ * , e I [ c-I //, i + 4 i 4 i 1 1 1 4 4 1 kSD VA $9/71J n.r.es.a e7 ,oot. . (> Figure 2 90005247 2

I s fl I l

\\

[ g*C,c W J m D g*Df g C [ u 0. ~/\\ 4 C Y C "L j T .F. ,.,vE% M 3t ,A s i* R E ..F S yvEp D. > R a ,A ~ U e N D _ ,s54 g 0, C *- uE R P e. AC gFt9 R D gCC4 O R (DPu D O // 'e l / N C N E E C Y" r. u r, V R h 9 g u 5 WI* D a L [4D A S HtC N T rwa / / ///// O N C J AF T E f CD i E 0 g u $RO 0R g 1C LA g S Aav PS THL g$MA7 OCH y'Tt TFP D l R TP O OS C I LD E R C E D 5 N 1O O 0C IT C E R O P R A N 5 E i M 4 3 l 4 G U N NI T V EI RA E N p( / . // // C P E l g R g g g ./ / / // t ) R INA g MH C g C C( )R g _/- / / ,/// A Ae C p At C 3( A PC_/ / / /- - / // y v l _l A t A 5$ 4' VE 02 5 t q. g Ggn;q ytO.0 fPCE8 gE S R E D g O C AN. HE3 E N CC 8 s A O RH8 N I UC T P a e N C s r T E 7_

Ec=

8" e R PS ie A o s. IN P Im S U? " ~ 85hO )t I f ]

Q. D. 3.6 Page 9 5/1/72 ( DCN Part No. Quan. E' E. "'.' '7.* f. / ".'.". ; :Q. C. .T n 1 c;; .?.. : L*.'.* 2, Ser. No. -FL/No. v RS P.O. 1c0 33 DCN Part No. Q.C. Quan. p.- w' Ser. No. FL/No. 4 RS P.O. CLEANING DATE MFG GC PS DAKC QUT. AIR TYPC s PS0200001 OU T G AS-V AC. METHoo P50 20000 t OUT G AS-TYPE P5020000$ LEAK R AT C: Figurc 4. Acceptance Tags 90005249 t I

~-_ _. D-Q. D. 3. G D e 10 Pag /72 5/1 (v'*'. t S/fl 6190 , s..m.

s g..,

',?TELEOYf ?E gc Tg.h j,T " ISOTOPES rrain mu -umm perr urc pguq;o;ra.,n a mmnnre a- .,:,.. i va ,u-p gp l l l

iu mmt L--,

OAII $5' IEU 3 I O... 4e he h#.a.utw we arvant.A boa eb. esses) m m.w. ,I974Rra l E i a, sma....u. i

i. rn.cr.m

'****"') Antt ausa:ta I tl 1 G 14 Siti w.ma ew,um, o. ....:armrn,$ i s on nitag sia s ma ssa cc-Figure 5

.w

,e p se 9000~5250 !d 1 0 0 I 1

Q D. 3.0 B Pave 11 5/1/'/2 p WTEl.EDYNE ISOTOPES SUPPLIER CORRECTIVE ACTidM REQUEST SCAR NO. SUPPLi(R N&4 AND A00#t$5 pagr a,Avf pAgg g, P.O. 60. .cn. au. .x, 0($CRIPitCM 0f Ol5CAEPA'40Y OR PRQglL% i e-e i l i ]!NFGAMAllC'6 0%Y O <0== At n:av Rz: stat 0 if icAro Call 4 OstlCMl@ CAli APPR;;yg 51CNAft At $1cs tgt, aYCG Art i@ i7E4 fi,00st.i.! a un.%f*t i*v'iflC Afie F f wi WJ 0's..v es%tO e :9 $';;vt! A y.etris:Ptees'!',;g'tNc o.! A!M!. CA:. 15 A';2 00't:. ..eis wiseswsm mass owswnw, armu von i.svoni,aew% asu wt47 mal et SitAto sr li covlewlNI CUAp IN J'PW5f*>fAf M p.' aO.v Ai'tsv4 sud. ALNAI AG,iiil SibiD af A 8 iv0N5it;1 McM5;4 Ci 90tt Aw'.Actv!N!. Ao Sutt.tir!D to ;"E0YN! 150f 0 Pts MO, litMGE AN!Mt3 ljiLCW ] 1 thirt;flC4 Or 5';a5H'.ta.t 810tlPf 5 FC4 PURP0515 Of ACCEPfA?;Ot CR RLt !!04 Alt O(Pi,ND UPO' lit i fl#aY AiCitPT A%) APP 90 VAL OF YO'.A R TC(0Y'.!!$0icrtS NiO Q! AttfY. I a l P05tfM CO tRECTivt A0itCN 9 Calf 51 (STAft 5PiclF10 CAUSL CF DISORIPA*i;Y CA PR05Lt'M s AC110N 15fAft SP(Olfl0 A0il0N 1AFIN TO P4EVtNT RIOURRENCI 0F id Ol5 Cat *ANCY OR PR00W.11 g Itt[DiNl 15Cf0PL5 MD QLALLI) #LPWLi(Ni All'.1 t54CNAiiMU (HlC1tYlfY A.NDIOR cArg Lt lf SCRIAL AD. CO/tRN'.iLNI OL.ALliY R(TRE$(h!AllVt ($1C%Af t;R() 7;Jrn It t'$ W. C. MA'eAC(f *491 Ol7,541bRLI D All IN51RUC110N5 504 (CAintilNC IHl$ ICRM C'l FIVl#TI SICt. G.[J,'j.}[) O ~ Figurc 6 l 90005251

+_ ? f 'l" lip.1 '"I yU gd1jpE gkul$ "[NELEDYNE V; W w b ENERGY SYSTEMS IIILE: (2 INTERNAL QUALITY lsUDITS "IV l OlHEC11'.E NO 5.' 3 B Rig}Al{By g g O RE M 01iE 11/51/79 R! VISED Bt E. T. Charyszyn/G. Chryst 08:CW1.t iS51,E C1.iE i R(VIEWE0 BY: / 9/29/70 l J. <' r % d a.*? % [f, {~ "[ /$$: f.t), 4YW,s: Ado 5 1. SCOPE { l.1 Summary This document defines the method and timing for accomplishing internal audits of Quality Operations, Process Specifications,;I Fabrication, Test and Storage Areas and other functions. 1.2 Purpose ) To assure adherence to internal operating specifications. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Quality Enaineering Quality Engineering shall define which functicns are to be h"' schedule the audits, maintain all documentation

audited, team j

associated with the audits, participate as an audit member when required and perform the corrective action l Quality Engineering will also review with the j follow up. the audit objectives, j k audit team members, prior to the audit, technical aspects of the audit, previous histories and any 1 items of particular concern. 2.2 Ouality Control Quality Control shall participate in the performance of the audit, and in the reporting of audit results. 2.3 All Departments All departments shall furnish personnel to serve as Audit Team members upon the request of Quality. 2.4 Quality Manacer The Quality Manager shall approve both the audit plans and those individuals responsible for conducting audits. 90005252 i n

w a

1 n-

Q.D. 5.3 B Page 2 n/2!/79 ({ 3. REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Audit Types Types of audits shall include, but shall not be limited to those listed below. 3.1.1 Quality operations Audits shall be audited to determine compliance Quality functions, with Quality Directives. 3.1.2 Process Specifications Audits shall be audited to determine The Manufacturing department compliance with the requirements of Process Specifications and Engineering drawings and/or specifications. 3.1.3 Fabrication and Test Area Audits Fabrication and testing areas such as the thermoelectric area, i generator assembly area, generator plating and finishing area,shall be audited to verify the adequacy of - testing area, etc., cleanliness and orderliness - general housekeeping and lightinc calibration of equipment in use - material handling and storage and - other characteristics as deemed appropriate. 3.1.4 Storage Area Audits Stockrooms shall be audited to verify'the adequacy of - (,) cleanliness anu orderliness - general housekeeping - material handling and storage - material identification including evi-dence of Quality acceptance - traceability of materials to Purchase orders and - other characteristics as deemed appropriate. 3.2 Frequency of Audits An audit shall be conducted monthly. 3,3 Audit Planninc _ shall establish audit schedules and shall Quality Engineering select the specific items to be audited based on current experience factors. 3.4 Notification of Audit Audit notice shall be submitted to the af fected area Manager at least 24 hours prior to the start of the audit. 3.5 Auditing Personnel Personnel participating as audit team members will not have to audit. any direct responsibilities in the areas subject all audit team members will be chosen en the Furthermore, l basis of their technical knowledge, expertise and past experience relative to the area being audited, sJ 90005253

Q.D. 5.3 B i Page 3 11/28/79 O 3.6 Reporting Audit Results The Audit Team shall issue and Audit Report in memorandum format describing the findings of each audit. Quality Engineering shall distribute the Audit Report as follows: a. Quality Manager b. Manager of department audited (Engineering, Program, Fabrication or Material Control as applicable). c. Responsible Supervisor d. Quality Engineering files. When discrepancies are reported, Quality Engineering shall initiate an Audit Reply form (Fig. 1) and forward it along , with the Audit Report to the appropriate manager. A Liaison Call sheet (Figure 2) may be processed in accordance with Quality Directive 5.4 to report anomalies in Engineering specifications or drawings. In this case, the utilization of the Audit Reply form is not required. 3.7 Corrective Action Reporting The manager responsible for implementing corrective action on l the reported discrepancies shall complete the Audit Reply form and forward the completed form to Quality Engineering. (o, 3.8 Corrective Action Follow-Up Quality Engineering shall maintain a file of Internal Quality Audit documents and shall perform follow up surveys to ascer-tain the affectiveness of corrective actions. 4. NOTES / APPENDIX 4.1 Figures Figure 1 - Audit Reply Figure 2 - Liaison Call Sheet (ESD-22 3 ) s 90005254 e m 4 4 9 -, _c. ,e .-..,--,--v,m__-,-m .c.-

Q.D. 5. 3 B , Page 4 11/21/7 9 -4 At!DIT 11F, PLY To: Date: From: Ref: Audit fleport Memorandum No. In compliance with the requirements of Quality Directive Mo. 5. 3. " Periodic Internal Quality Audits", picarc reply below, to the referenced Audit Report Memorandum. Corrt etive action taken: i U Action taken to prevent recurrenec: r Manag;cr Date Figure 1 90005255

0.D.5.3 B ...._............--...-----.r.. u.- ---.. -. - - - p5 g g - 11/21/ 7 0 f I w. LIAISON Call SHEET (1) f.fodat (2) Order tio.

13) Baa fis.

(4) 5.ast f.o. 6 (5) WA (G) Enyg Juo No. I Sima:;e i ves O a) us.gnea n E x t. (10) Dwg No.is) & or ToS No. (111 Onginator l No _ _ _l_ (12) l'Ig. L:, con Rep. (13) 54ervisor'sSqnature g(14) Date (8) Ext.]D) Date I i (15) Cescription of troucle (IC) Rea:on for Change N. (17) Answer i 9 (20) Ds:e (19) :nastgator's Signature (18) Onginator : Cancurience LSD-223 11tJSON ) =. _ - . et Figure 2 90005256

m %mm 3ni*I bdV PT O@llS!ETif W 6 P~I A - ' ' '/PTELED'/ME ISOTCPES iniLE. h UTILIZATION OF LI AISON CALL SIIELT 5.4

A OR G W 10 BY R. Wathen HEWSC D'UI Original alviSED BY.

GRGW ISS E REvilWE0 SY NE i 0F 7 h7. I '). ' H~rf MFHovto. 1. SCOPE j \\ i 1.1 Summary-l This directive describes the usage of the Liaison Call Sheet by Quality personnel to ef fect documented communica-f ..__ _.. tion.to resolve technical problems. ~ "- ~ -- ~~ 1.2 Purpose ~~ Tile proper use of the Liaison Call Sheet provides ~ document ation and a method of f ollow-up f or formal _.. _ communication between Quality Operations.and other departments for the resolution of problems concerning saf ety, drawings, technical documents, methods, procedures, ctc. 1.3 References ~~~ This directive is authorized by Quality Procedures 2.0 " Drawings and Specifications," 5.0 " Quality Engineering," 1 and 11.0 " Corrective Act. ion.".____ 1.4 _.___._._ Applic abilit y .I i ~ ~~ This directive has been prepar6d to conform with: ~ .Conformance Agency Quality Specification Partial Comple t c: AEC. -- SNAP-1, - an d - - -- - X AEC SNS-1 X ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ NASA ~ ~ ~~" ~ ~ ~ 5 4 0 0. 4 (1b) X X l --MIL Q-9S58 A - - DOD

1. 5 ~~~-~ L'imit u ions --~

~ 1.5.1 The Liaison Call Shoot is not an of ficial Quality record and must not be used.f or deviation, variation or repair j records. U 90005.257 -.---.--.r.-r

QD 5.4 A 4 Page 2 12/8/71 l , ([ l A Liaison Call Reply is not to be used as an acceptance 1.5.2 It may, however, be used as supplemental criteria. inf ormation to be attached to a change notice, R.S. Tag or other document or to communicate that a documented change has been, or is being, accomplished. The Liaison Call Sheet is a division-wide document; 1.5.3 however, this directive is concerned only with LCS's originated by Quality Operations and/or those answered by Quality Engineering. These limitations apply only when QD 3.4 " Quality 1.5.4 Control of INSD Fabricated Material," is implemented by program requirement. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Originator Quality Operations - The initiation or generation of a 2.1.1 is the responsibility of any Quality Liaison Call dile e t personnel who requests or requires Engineering or action or help in resolving Manufacturing coordination, or correcting an error, omission or problem which affects tested the acceptability of the product being manufactured, or inspected. Quality Encineering - Quality Engineering shall review the 2.1.2 answers on all LCS's originated by Quality personnel. Action should be taken by Quality Engineering for prompt follow-up and corrective action. 2.' 2 Engineering /Manufacturinc/ Quality Engineerine The assigned respondent of a Liaison Call Sheet shall be action and/or resolution responsible for timely attention,and to return to the originator of the situation or request an adequato and acceptable answer within a reasonable time frame. 3. REQUIREMENTS Situations Requiring Use of the Liaison Call Sheet 3.1 Liaison Call items include requests to: Correct an error or deficiency in the design of a part a. or tool; b. Clarify or correct a drawing notation,. process, plan or specification; and safo: l a condition affecting personnel or equipment c. Correct 90005258

w a. = m -

z. : ::

QD 5.4 A Page 3 gi 12/8/71 3.2 Form Used Liaison Call sheet, Form I-E-123 (Fig. 1). 4 3.3 Origination of a Liaison Call A Liaison Call is originated using the Liaison Call Sheet when a problem item requires the immediate action of another department. Quality personnel Action - When the Liaison Call is 3.3.1 warrancea, Quality personnel shall: in triplicate, in sufficient prepare a Liaison Call Sheet, 3.3.1.1 delay in detail as to be self-explanatory and to prevent acting on the subject. (See Appendix, para. 4.1, LCS ( Preparation Instructions). Distribute the Liaison Call Sheet as follows: 3.3.1.2 (Liaison) and the pink (design) copy are j

a. The white sent to the Liaison coordinator for assignment to proper department and individual for an answer.

b. The green (originator) copy is placed in the LCS Book as a record until the white (Liaison) is returned.

c. The hardback copy may be retained by the originator until be receives the white (Liaison) with the signed reply.

3.4 Liaison Action The personnel assigned' to reply to a Liaison Call Sheet on each by the Liaison Call coordinator will answer and act i Liaison Call in a timely manner. 3.5 Follow-up Action indicate the action Reply detail should answer the question, taken, or define the proposed action to resolve the problem. When the reply is received, the Liaison 3.5.1 LCS Originator Action: originacor should review the answer, forward it to Call Sileet Quality Engineering, and, if necessary, discuss reply action with Quality Engineering. A Quality Engineer will sign the reply in the originator's 3.5.1.1 indicating acknowledgment of a satisfactory (. concurrence block, answer. 90005259 ,44 y-

i ) QD 5.4 A Page 4 l (f. 12/8/71 i When the reply is unsatisfactory, the originator, with 3.5.1.3 shall make a notation Qu ?ity Engineering concurrence, stating the reply portion of the Liaison Call Sheet un. 2 tha" " Reply is Not Satisf actory" and give reason. If resolve the coordination with the assigned engineer cannot refer the Liaison Call to the section supervisor

problem, on the condition or next higher authority,as required,to act until resolution of the item is achieved.

Copies of all replies and correspondence concerning a Liaison 3.5.1.4 Call Sheet will be filed by LCS Sheet number in the Liaison Call Book. 3.6 Preparation of Liaison Call Sheet (Originator) The originator shall complete all applicable blocks in upper part of the Liaison Call Sheet except 10, 11 and 13 through 16 and 21 through 23 as follows. Only one item or trouble should be described on each Liaison Call Sheet. (1) Model - Name of item of equipment concerned, such as: SNAP-19, Pioneer, Viking, 'etc. ~ (2) Order No. - Specif y INSD account number f or program. (3) Control Point - The Control Point Number concerned may be indicated in this block (see below): Control Point Number Area of Concern 10 Administr ation Quality Control 20 Fabrication and Assembly 30 40 Testing 50 Fuel Capsule 60 Safety Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE: 70 80 Quality Engineering (4) Book No. - Indicate the Liaison Call Book number in which the LCS will be filed by the originator. Indicate the next sheet number in the Liaison (5) Sheet No.Call Sheet Book Log and indicate the originator's name and program next to that number in the LCS Book Log. ~ 90005260

4 QD 5.4 A i Page 5 12/8/71 (f (6) Drawing No(s). or Tool No(s). - List the complete urawing or tool numocr(s) ; add additional numbers in section (24 ) as an extension of (6). (7) Originator - Print originator's name.(first initial and last name) in this block. J (8) Extension No. - Indicate INSD telephone extension number. J (9) Location - Indicate section of originator, i.e., Quality f Engineering (QE), Quality Control (QC). (12) Date - Enter the date the trouble or LCS originated. (17) Work Stoppage - Place "X" in applicable block. (18) Recommended Effect_ - Indicate serial numbers of affected units, 11 Known. (19) Articles Requiring Rework - Indicate quantity of, or serial numoers, of, itens requiring rework, if applicable. [ (20) Articles TCO - List quantity of, or serial numbers of, items "Taken care of" or which have had the operation or, rework completed as of time that LCS is written. (24) Description of Trouble - Describe in sufficient detail the proolem or request and urgency of situation, if warranted. Inc)ude page, paragraph or area of a drawing' af f ected or nomenclature of part or equipment, etc., which requires the evaluation and reply. Write specific questions and list exact detailed requirements, sketches, etc., so as to prevent delaying questions by the person assigned to answer the Liaison Call Sheet. Other information may be attached by using additional forms. (25) Reason for Change - In simple language, specify reason for Liaidon Call Sheet, such as " omission, error, clarification, fit, etc.". ~ (11) Supervisor's Signature - Upon completion of above blocks, outain Llie quality Control or Quality Engineering supervisor's signature, as applicable. 90005261 ~ ~ ., - ~,. -

QD SA A Page 6 12/8/71 4. APPENDIX 4.1 Figures Figure 1, Liaison Call Sheet, Form I-E-123. P qw-ewye e W 9 '*WM* 0005e a 9 ...m ..=,. m a = \\ ~ d e ^ r. ) ~ l

y-y- ,a m.s g. n g-QD 5.4 A Page 7 12/8/71 LIA150H C ALL SHEET l 4,3 ,q3gg g;; capte NO. ! ( 33 CT'I#0L,, ' ,,,,,a . usi.%te so.

i. u

t. m see ao.

M g c. t i:43 gar AQ.ig9,gg;Af10% 184)A5$1% (0 87 tel pas. 40. 6 5 4 4 Os IOGL 10'L I 3 4"'Ci 8 O I [ ~~ -1 -- hi; 3pt iisi ar N tiii~ 7t~ oA . s sic.ar.,as i i 3 s...se gio 3 na t s L I A t 3M ht#. 1 g I I ' 8 ' 'I 7*7[k",'0 Y, (([M 't' OgycRGLIAt139 b~ ( t ? ) *1 ** MIO LIASION I I 5 7 0 P P A Gf. g is e sa t :(Lt$ 3(Cul al%3 I', O cs .w - s., sty l L t g.j p a a t i c'.C 5 'G fe0 e 's r.t;0 f 8(T80 f 3 2 n s G. t2D t' sat. ( g4) o g 3 C R I P f iC'. OF T RC'J Ik I $7ArP 5 taw' gi 5 i }b h l i l l \\- l ~ - L k._ l t i t251 #EA5;M '0" C" G L e ~ ~ ~ (166 AN5*L9 i ~~ ) iH I . - =1 \\ l l 1 i j l I k1 i L. t I._: 7 so.itocs ATOR*3 '3'I ~ 1,, i n. ~ m,. s ,,,, c.. t. 1 o";gli:, , g,,.est5f'at siutt CONChaatmCE y LIN50:8 ~ r-m I-E -12 3 { l

a ot*:cN

~ l'~ I-E -12 3 i I-t-K 7. CR!GNATOR i 1-i.123 ~ OPJCitWCR P.ardtock Cory 90005263

@l h_l7U p'!Mp"7]u'\\ s A! n "/PTELEDYME No nV vMevI L ENERGY SYSTEMS TifLE. ( QUALITY PLANNING s .i ORIGMIED Sf DIRECilv! 'ic. REV J. Wendernth /M. Kanlow

5. s C

n!visto sr. E. T. Charyszyn 11/21/70 0%htL 15:UE ClIE aEviet.E0 By' s /(AL4vyd 5/1/72 1 (f]&T,*55:.4). AfQw.:C0 4 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summary This directive delineates the planning functions performed by Quality Engineering.

1. 2 Purpose To assure that:

__a. The functions of the Quality Program that must be performed to fulfill the contractual requirements of product control, product documentation and produc.t acceptance, are identified. W

b. Quality Control is provided with the software they require L'

to accomplish their share of those functions.

1. 3 Reference

~

a. Quality Directive 2.1, " Configuration Control".

2. RESPONSIBILITY 2.1 Quality Encineering Quality Engineering has sole responsibility for the accomplishment of the requirements of this Directive. 3. REQUIREMENTS

3. i Quality Engineerinc Action 3.1.1 Technical Documents

~~~ ~ ~~ Upon receipt (from the Engineering Release System) of new or revised drawings, procedures, specifications and changes there-to, Quality Engineering shall promptly forward copies td Quality Control. ,.O O ' ~ v ,,,,,ye , eme e. o.d 90005264

_, n, Q. D. 5 5 C Page 2 11/21/79 (37 3 1.2 Instaction and Test Ins t ruc tions/Pla ns Quality Engineering shall: the Technical Documents to identify the a ceptance c

a. Review to th'e Program.

requirements applicable

b. Provide quality Control with written inspection and test (Certification Logs, ES 46) as required.

instructions The Certification Logs shall be designed to collect and evidence of product compliance and quality document objective Included within the log shall be applicable acceptance.process spe'cifications, Engineering.'lork Crders (ES-227), test data and Quality Check Sheets (Figure 1).

drawings, 3 1.2.1 Ouality Check Sheets _

Quality Check Sheets shall: a.

1. List hold points during fabrication or processing requiring Quality review and verification.

for: the Q. C. inspector's 2.-Provide a space at cach hold pointthe manufacturer's signature, the stamp (or signature), custccor's signature (as applicabic).

b. When ecmpleting a quality Check Sheet the Q. C. inspector shall:

an item's status and indicate ec=pletion

1. Review and verify the appropri-of inspection by stamping or signing alongside j

J ate ite. l 2., List at each item on the check list any applicable noncon-notices, notes formance reports (RS Tags), drawing change l -- of clarification and serial numbers. 4 l f 313 Records Retention - for retention, the Quality Engineering shall record and file and quality documents and evidence of product compliance j acceptance in accordance with contractual obligations and/or ~ .Cc=pany.needs. Such documentation shall include Certification Logs, Manufactur- -~ _...._ Ting Orders and Furchase Crders. 3 1.4 Con ficura tion Records -Quality Engineering shall prepare and maintain Configuration Records from Engineering Relcases for deliverable products and record the applicable changer in the a propriate Certifi-for verification by Quality Control. cation logs These activities are detailed in qua ity Directive 2.1, l " Configuration Control". 90005265

Q. D. 5 5 C Page 3 11/21/79 315 Quality For:.s and Instructions Quality Engineering.shall:

a. Originate or revise the quality Depart =ent forms and form instructions.

b. Supply such forms to the users as needed.

j i 4. APPENDIX 4.1 Figure 1 - Sacple quality Check Sheet as contained in quality Certification Log (ES 46). / 90005266 ~. ed .w o e 9 l ~ ( i 1

l Q.D. 5.5C Page 4 .11/21/79 ~. -.. n r,._Lr D.., n,. 1s070. 33 QUAUTY CHECK SHEE1 n i 54' I't't CV't ifY cui! riu Ctstedfic4 no. N / Trse tor !'oit fication Or,xt re DM2?B / N Refereree: /. ~ ~., Verify previous acceptance of details, attach identifiestion (,,,9 [f 1. w trigs in this log. 2. Assure that ftecs 3, 4. 7 !. 8 are finished per pag. fote 1.

g+

O n-bea ' C ' L C S 6.l 31J . -3 '^ g ',p/,3 efiS / i Check: 3

a. Recoval of Spec. Plate and relocation per note at 3/2. -

gifb I i - b. Covering of existing holes in truck panel. '). t u-

c. Location and drilling of 21/4 dia. hole as shorin in

['itf')k.[ ' d - J .m'. /, View D-D. ) I i

d. Location ar.d dimen. check of slot in Item 4

. git a fly,! j \\ 'fr '14 'W:d I u/f" '* s l j

e. Location and dicen. check of clot i t. Item 2 - see View C-;

~ \\ 9*' \\~,1 j ..,-4. D /[ Q -.'[}'S' {i f.: Location drilling and tapping of holes in Item 5 - sec

...i D...

, i View A.A.

1-l g.5 ocation and' drilling of holes in Item 6 (le f t panc1).

f:>g. ~ L v. TJA C/ 8

h. I.ocation ar.d drilling o f holcc in (Item 7.)

) [ '.. /*7fe3 '1,.> M4 "' 7/. r3. o y f I ')~. W I ('

i. Location and attscheent of Itats 3, 4. 5 & 6 Plates to t,

[ T'4 l [ Item 2withweldsnotedinPlan'Tiew. j sce L c s -a p-= 2 ' W }/ l N y,qo g, x% 5 'N ~ Tirer TrucP I'/

r,etor twc. 25f+-30D0078

Reference:

Omtutty' hardware are no specified in [f.. '[ 4. Verify co ponente .t s List of l'sterislya t.aca 2 dent 'n tags in this loc. c-a-aS9 a d I.D. l* Lgu pwo+w h c <J " C " c /c"' ' MtwM

i e. r * -.: c $.

i'r. *' artor g5gy gg, i 4 t* * 's e ~ e n fdCI Cf nam? $All ) (kcl %![R: PPD - tiPP00 SER. FC. /A:' '* E CCW12 A;1 hS. FloCR A.'J flRL t, '. Figure 1 - Quality Check Sheet 9000'5267 c

,= yAHE-{TN{u i 'C .. WTE!.EC'/NE gjJ@Al.]! I i db ISOTO.ES M o Ilit[: STANDARDS AND CALIBRATION ) aty C 0:at m i.0 7,1 OR W I!D sf J.K. Wenderoth "I\\" *E 4-6-74 REVISED BY. C. W. Rowe OnlG:NAL IS3bE SME 7-10-69 Eht!V.E0 BY l FACE 1 uf 9 E S lN D&E 4bo/ 7 tp APPROVED m 1. SCOPE 1 1.1 Summary This directivo defines a system for controlling the calibration of measurement and test equipment used for determination of product acceptability.

1. 2 Purpose To provide guidelines for the operation of a calibration program that will both insure conformance to contractual requirements and promote a high degree of accuracy in measurement and test data.

1. 3 Reference Quality Procedure 7. 0, " Standards and Calibration. "

n. b. Military Specification: " Calibration System Requirements," MIL-C-45GG2 A, 1902 2. RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Quality Encineering \\ Quality Engineering will prepare and maintain an equipment listing defining all equipment requiring ca;;b'.tlon and the applicabic calibration interval.

2. 2 Quality Control _

7 Quality Control will be responsible for maintaining and calibrating, within the prodotermined calibration interval, all equipment specified by Quality En.:incering; maintaining measurement standards; and, maintaining documentation associated with the operation of the calibration system. 90005268 A B

Q. D. 7.1 C T Page 3 1 4/8/74 1 '~ k O d.

2. 3 Other Departments e

All other departments will be responsible for verifying that new equipment under their cogniaance is calibrated before use and for verifying that old equipment under their cognizance is within the stated ~ calibration period. 3. REQUIREMENTS l,, 3.1 Determination of Calibration Intervals Quality Engineering will establish the calibration intervals for both existing and newly purchased equipment. w ~ Calibration Cveles for Existin: Equipment _ - The calibration intervals i 3.1.1 for existing equipment wtll oc based on imowledge of equipment history s and limitations, and review of vendor literature. Calibratio.1 Cveles for New Equipment - Calibration requirements will be e 3.1.2 cstablishca upon receipt or new equipment and will be based on experience with similar equipment and vendor literature. d

3. 2 Adjustments to Established Calibration Cveles Quality Control may alter the established calibration cycle for a speci.fic piccc of equipment with Quality Engineering approval, on the basis of the calibration history of that piece of equipment.

g. 3.2.1 Increased Calibration - The calibration cycle for a piece of equipment may be shortened wnen that equipment has required adjustment during hvo consecutive calibrations. t 3.2.2 Decreased Calibration - The calibration cycle for a piece of equipment may be lengtucncu when that equipment has completed four consecutive calibrations without an adjustment. d s 3.3 Recall System Quality Control will establish and operate a recall system which will insurc a the timely calibration of all equipment. Equipment History File - A card file (Fig.1) will be maintained on each 3.3.1 piece et eqtupment and will include, as a minimtun, the required a calibration dates and the calibration history of the equipment. I I V 90005269 J t -nn

_e-- Q. D. 7.1 C i' Page 3 i 4/8/74 ( Recall Notifiention - A memorandum will be forwarded to the user of

3. 3. 2 a piece of equipment before that equipment is due for calibration.

CNerdue Notification - A memorandum will be written to the cognizant j 3.3.3 department head when equipment duc for calibration is not turned in to Quality Control by the recall date. 3.4 Extension of Calibration Certification Quality Engineering may extend an existing calibration certification for This extension will be granted in a period not to exceed two weeks. cases where there is a critical need for the particular piece of equipment and there is evidence that a calibration delay will not adversely affect the product.

3. 5 Calibration Procedure Quality Control will perform actual calibration of equipment or will assume responsibility for calibration at a recognized calibration All calibration will be in accordance with the require-laboratory.

ments of MIL-C-45GG2 A, Adenunev of Standards - Standards established by the contractor for calibrating the measuring and test equipment used in controlling product (3 quality shall have the capabilities for accuracy, stability and range w' required for the intended use. In-Houce Calibration - In-house calibration will be performed in accord-l 3.5.1 ance with standard calibration practices. Written procedure will be pre-pared and utilized for calibration of all measuring and test equipment and measurement standards used to assure the accuracy of measurements Measuring and test involved in establishing product conformance. equipment and measurement standards will be calibrated and utilized in an environment controlled to the extent necessary to assure continued measurements of required accuracy giving due consideration to temp- { crature, humidity, vibration, cleanliness, and other controllable factors l affecting precision measurement. j Upon completion of calibration, complete the equipment history card and 3.5.1.1 j affix a stamped calibration sticker (Fig. 2) to the equipment, Equipment found to be out-of calibration is immediately brou;ht to the l attention of Quality Control. So that reinspection of material will be l taken on all materials that may have been accepted by the equipment out-of calibration. Calibrated mechanical equipment unused during a calibration cycle may 3.5.1.2 be integrity inspected in lieu of ree:dibration. J 90005270 i

Q. D. 7.1 C Page 4 4 /8/74 ( Vendor Calibration - Equipment which cannot be calibrated in-house 3.5.2 will be sent to an approved (by Quality Engineering) calibrution laboratory. An Equipment Service Request (ESR) tag (Fig. 3), signed by Quality 3.5.2.1 Control, will be attached to the equipment requiring calibrat.lon. A Work Release (Fig. 4) will be completed for each piece of equipment 3.5.3.2 requiring calibration and will be forwarded to the calibrating agency. Upon return of calibrated equipment, review calibration certificate for 3.5.2.3 completion, sign Work Release and forward to Procurement, complete equipment history card, and assure that the equipment contains a valid calibration sticker. Scaline of Calibrated Equinment_- Calibrated equipment will be scaled (if reasonable) with a tamper-proof seal to prevent unauthorized entry / j 3.5.3 l adjustment. Calibrntion of Reference and Trnnsfor Standards - A purchase requisition 3.5.4 will be initiated to obtain calibration of standards. This purchase requisi-tion will include the requirement for a certificate of compliance attesting to the date, accuracy, and conditions under which the results furnished were obtained. Calibration source-measuring and test equipment shall be calibrated utilizing reference standards whose calibration is certified Y as being traceable to the National Bureau of Standards.

3. 6 Functional Checkinc of Eauinment Equipment that is not required to assure conformance of product but is necessary for overall efficient plant operation will be functionally checked upon request of the user.

3.7 Verification of Calibration Status All users of measuren$cnt/ test equipment will verify that the equipment is within calibration (as denoted by the attached sticker) and verify that the integrity seals are intact. Out-of-Calibration /Malfunctioninc Equinment - Out of calibration /malfunc-3.7.1 tioning equipment will be reported to Quality Control who will place an Out of Service (Fig. 5) tag on the equipment pending calibration or repair. All out-of service equipment and equipment not in daily use with exception of large test equipment, consoles,etc., shall be segregated in speci.fic equipment holding areas. 90005271 .u

Q.D.7.1C e Page 5 4/8/74 (~

3. 7.1.1.

Product that has been manufacturea / ested with discrepant equipment t as noted above, will be documented cn an RS tag for final disposition. 4. NOTES / APPENDIX 4.1 Ficures Figure 1 - Equipment Calibration History Card, Form 000300 (Rev.1-04) Figure 2 - Calibration Sticker, Form I-Q-401 Figure 3 - Equipment Service Request and Calibration Notice, Form TE-2G7 (1962) Figure 4 - Work Release Form Figure 5 - Out of Service Tag, Form I-31-303 90005272 g s e \\

Q. D 7.1C Page 6 4/g/74

v. NTc=vAu e.

e l 't < 4 s c P

2. E Q. jap M E P. T N A M E 0,

'S, O,

3. C wS T 00e A N

12. M A S T C h i1 PAQb

4. LO C A T IO N e

C A L i D M A T E O/ t N $p E C T C D 7.nCMARK$ 8.DATE

9. STAMP

10. C V $ T.

II. CV E DATE C 4 i e Yl5UAL INSPECTION RC CORD A7 TRIBUTC D AT A 060306 REYlSEO l 64 1 I ( s. 90005273 igure 1 r r

Q, D, 7,1 C r- - * 'noroi tr m Page 7 i J g.n.. .,.u.D 4 jg j74 ,,4. a 7.6..../ i.w *.. [. ( m... u.s c. r.-

rauru.a-t,* m........ _ _

~ Figure 2 I ,.,2 J03 No. EQUIPu,ENT SERVICE REQUEST '<AND CAllBRATICN NOTICE ntC*:2 .;A!.2 ACCOU:iTABLZ TO ,,, u. gm_.e w _y---_..~.--.__-....c.aay;, bw3 GC. a ~~.-s-LQLrdh.l::G UAMA ( ~ DATE G.J. : J. Di;.G ktT. uxAT1;;8 F:w.E SLPIAVDOr. GALiB. L;LZ DA TI I I l ccer, nirmincz ruun u-l rumT. no a cum,afo o ACCOUNT !suh'i.3 CiKCt3 TO t i DESCRIPTION OF MMIU:;CTION l l sm - _ -, __ _B E0ulPt,';ENT CONTROL CRI j me.. i.ccAues --oAn uca. -, 2.e.

c. 4 Ant:.we.r l

"l ouACsev.uoa l*I* i nano. en:n, cro o FMY$!On OM.MCC l ' l l ";',.l N h. 7L M. "3 l lusrcuac tour. court. gigv&NJ 2 E.mq \\ T." NN*L CALIBRATIC:1 CENTER US liq C A 0. Wt..r', 2.uI caw. P.E PAU MCD. ,,wg, p.c. ,,m_,___ I CorJECTn't ACTION TAXINs l 4[AM/ l (- ORIGlHATOR Figure 3

s Q. D. 7. IC . Page 8 ,4 / /74 p

)

w.. PURCHASE ORDER YMf 8 Q ff Q T"gI Cld s{ P f* ft I F M I" 'W i/ U lt iis Lk $ I C .- ) b $ U b b". THl5 ORDER flUMBER MUST APPE AR ^* All CCFRESPO!4DE N CE. INVC" FACKAGES AND SiliPP:NO FAl't. Dofe: To: Ship To: f:P YlA F.O.S. TERMS DELIVERY REQUIR'D l DESCR;PflCN ppicg A uc y,,,7 CUA N filf \\ i 1 l By: ~ 4 ( ~ 90005275 Figure 4 i \\

8 ~ Q. D. 7,1C Page 9 ('*' 4/8/74 4 OT OF SERV:CI ~ REC ALIBR ATE INSTRUMENT ATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH O/P NO. BEFORE C RETURNING TO SERVICE I-M-303 SIG N E D EXT. DATE \\ Figure 5 90005276 L-een.

Q ! O A f T 7 V g g T f f't"!C '/PTELEDYNE ENERGY SYSTEMS QdMUid OanL a I L \\/L tirtt: PRCCUREME!iT DCCUME!;TS - QUALITY RECUIPE!:E:ITS 1 i REV. DIRECliVi 40 o.1 C OR GINMED BY o ...bi t e 2. a 0E*0'O " 2/h/76 Yl. R. Seetoo OH:CINAL ISCUE O ! A!WE'MD PAGE I Of 7 ~ AP FR 0','E D. g 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summery i This directive specifies the quality requirements that are appli-cable to the preparation o f procurement documents to ensure the receipt of high quality materials. 1 1.2 Purpose j This directive is issued to de fine the procedures and documenta-tion methods by which quality personnpl will review and approve procurement documents to insure compliance with contractual V requirements. 2. RESFCIISIBILITIES 2.1 Qua]ity Encineerine Quality Engineering will review and sign all Purchase Requisi-I tions (PR) ES-49 (10/75) Figure 1). 3 REQUIREMZIITS 31 Quality Enrineerine Quality Engineering will, upon receipt of a Purchase Requisition: / 3 1.1 Review - Review the requisition to determine whether there is suf ficient in formation to order the required material (s). Such information will be obtained from drawings, speci ficaticns, par ts lists, catalogs, etc. 3 1.2 Renuirements - Determine the Quality requirea:ents thnt are neces-sary to assure product conformance with the contract s pe ci fica-i tions, Teledyne Energy Systems specifications and applicabic draw-i inCs, and make entries en the PR as de fd ned below, (h-90005277 4 - -. - _., _. - _ _. -~ a ,n

q. D. 8.1 C Page 2 2/4/76 3 1.2.1 Inspection requirements to be listed (if required):

s ) (a) Standard requirements as indicated on UQ-341 (Figure 2) "Qua2ity Accurance Provisions of Purchase Crders." I (b) Additional requirecents which are non-standard. 3 1.2.2 Enter in code blocks provided on FR the standard quality require-ments as indicated on NQ-341 (3/76), " Quality Assurance Provisions of Purchase orders," ac determined in 3 1.2. If N-9 (Qua]ity Pre-Award Survey) is entered, Procurement shall not place the order until the survey is co=plete. 3 1.2 3 The "Insp Area" block will be coded "X" for "No Inspection Required" or "R" for " Receiving Ins pec tion Required. " 3 1.2.4 "Insp. Type" block wil] be coded "R" for Norma] Receiving Inspec-tion or "S" for Special Requirements and "X" for "No Inspection Required." 3 1.2 5 Specific detailed requirements not covered in Itees 3 1.2.1 above will be noted in "Special Notes" block of PR. 3 1.2.6 When special or critical characteristics are to be checked and/or reported, such require =ents shall be fbrwarded en Receiving Inspection Report ( FS h23) (Figure 3) as required, to quality Control who shall attach the copy to the PC/PR package. 3 1.2.7 Sign and date FR in quality Control block. 3 1.2.8 Send the Quality copy of the FR to quality Control, ccdcJ for inspection requirements, and Quality Control shall file it in the Purchase Crder Control file awaiting attach =ent to the FO. 3 1.2 9 Forward PR to Administration Department for signature and further processing. 32 Quality Control 3 2.1 Review o f Purchace Order - Quality Control will, upon receipt of the quality copy o f the Furchase Order (ES-37) (Figure 4): 3 2.1.1 Remove copy of FR frem Purchase Order Control Fi]e. 3 2.1.2 Ccmpare the FO with the FR to assure that FR inspection require-mente are listed on the FO. 3 2.1 3 Where a discrepancy a f fecting Quality exists between the PR and PO, return the FO to Procurecent for correction. (2 90005278 1

4 Q. D. 8.1 C Page 3 2/4/76 (f> 33 Quality Control /?cceivinr Insrection 331 File PR/FO - quality Control will place the dccuments in. numerical order by PO number i'n the Receiving Inspection Control file to await receipt of material from vendor. 4. NOTES /AFFENDIX 4.1 Ficures Figure 1 - Purchase Requisition, ES 49 Figure 2 - Quality Assurance Provisions of Purchase Orders, NQ-341 Figure 3 - Receiving Inspection Report, ES 423 Figure 4 - Purchase Crder & Receiving Report (Lower Section), ES-37 4.2 Interface This Quality Directive inter f aces with the processing o f precure-ment documents as defined in the Procurement Manual, Index numbers: 29 Requisition of Material ~ ~ Processing 2.11 Purchase Request 2.12 Purchnse Orders and Subcontracts 901]05279 I e 9 4 f t l

Q. D. 8.1 c Pace 4 2/4/76 a ^ ' t -- - o ' - - (~ PURO!/dE REQUISIT!ON wxm,:i,,,. 4173/ m....u s,,,, , w....r, -, .,.....s.. --

.u...,,..

fur.CH A$( g p:% 7 q**..7 6 =h i=. tis p =y==*. ft ChD{R ..s .. m g h ui f ft .stL( A51 AU_,_ ae l \\,- f... l ' & 5Vt6. %. s a%, L,. e u & _%,' st Ar.at : 7.v'a t i n 110 W.11MO*.luY f tD. I t"U' ty'.1. MD 2 t(03 PitO*JE 201 ?b? F.77J TEl EX. G7 794 Ct!:t C TitJSES SillP T O: v.rti. 4 r ic; Atic 4 14 Ar.tL Ph4 Chi Malt h0. c..< is a. C00t3 ARIA TYPE I I i l l 1 t x t a n "'am 1:Hierntr^iovi^l u o.cArnc nows U.u. ,5 Alls ' 051 ( AX [ }

con Co auen.u.

l l ~ 5 HIP C At t 40All D(L Y.KLQ D l 0L il..'Af t uil lALCDUNINJ l cQy f g ($ (j l l } f ri: net arY a.o O t OTE:IF DRAWINGS ARE RECUmED ATTACH FOUR (4) COPIES l U- .E TOTAL f ft. AT COCC ( CC'.1Pitit CESCt:PiiOR l'.CLU3i'.G Sili,C0 toft MICHT.5FIC 411H NOU'. FIRST CU ANil1 Y O' e O e N' r l hfCIALN0163 101AL l (511',' At t 0 PR4Ct: R(U.Af45 I i t or.f instis c ruo.st O VilH1 O CRAL U odd (R CAlt DuALilY CON 1HOL GUYLR 61.Ascg g 091Gir4 Al uH b ll L.1 Al fitocnAu uA3 Aci n utr1 Marg Ac(It 90005280 mum To =c-u-~e-1 4 W se t. 9. p )

Pace 5 2/4/76 a 1 wq.po)1 rrL. me o/ l l ENSiCY SYSTEliS e QUAUTY ASSURAi1CE PROT!!SIONS OF PURGiASE ORDERS Puyer tereiroitter shall sean *eladyne NA 9tyer Ins;ection st rest!aaties Ecergy Syeten.

ot e: tra t irii r.4 any Articles te f t cJ t r the schedule of othe r proviale.r a, s..

art;cte3 furnien. gg, ,,,,,, y,, ed hereunder are s'a ty a t to t r.e Inspec. gg ,g g,g,,, gy g,ggg tion C):uae o f t..e aneral Trte:rions net Ise necentet by hyer a f tr.e "eller o f t he Purc M a.me Cr ;c t sa3 t r.e f o l i c e i r.c gg g g f 3 Special Inc rec t ;on i.l iace(s) ster indt. ,,,rt,gg,,. g,,g 4,g,, ,,3,,p,,g, sated by e ia%* nutter (s) in tre ecsec.

*A I""D*

l ele of the Purc r..sce Order. N*E N" Artieler Jef net in t*. ,ePet;'e of the Furc: v a ertar..i. r. na m - es f tufer source inspection Aall be con. joyer ift *..!'.- ..is u. ..t ducted at t i.e Ce:1er's fic:11 ties or s-t cita arcre deo strn.t ed i s thi s ':ori t r.s.: t, cert. est,<n. a>t.--

i-.

atJ ecorts ~[ ~~ en terean. pr i t.r to eP3; rent. ren (Pe ;ters are

- ' I"I"' I"' r"e t ? e r e o f,'"

I I*' "'d/ . N-1 Incrcy itecearch 6 Oeveleprent Aein's tes (IC) days ir afei c Esercy 2ecesteh L Tevelopment AJainia. notify the Saver ;at:lty 3enterentative trat*cn (i.*14) or the!'.4*carr.ttej au. or 'he Duyer area polity e f f de. C. Ltcarity ins pect 2or: la re1Mred trter t Orse1rcs avd/cr ctrer part: rut 12ta shiprent f rom pur ytant. Three ()) ehtch rey be r e :uired for sie.iaste in. copies of thic c t,n t r a c t Msve Seen fur. Mu a M e to t i r.h e J to the s.esta:.t Gonarr-art agee. 3 / scy.

4 ee copies aill be feratrJed to i

the a pp ro pri a t e jover r: er.t o ice haearg p-6 Checical ar.a ftypical Teet Feports g cegr.1:ance at 7uar plant. Actual creetcal mes/or pyrical trat M-2 Shireent to "uyer Centrsetor/Agercy reports, coe (1) copy is requir*J by (cr e em W. M eh w nn Ucuin s As aterial orJered hereurJer is to be '"*N" shippel direct to a hy*r destresteJ I " cor t e sc t or/nc re y, c c)ie n o f t

e da ta

""**I '**" *U' '- ~ ~ ~ requireJ by % cartrict chall secco-l 'd"'""d"* pary the stirwnt ani absti also be saileJ to P syer. " te ntion: Cus11ty N-7 Crnsing Retutterents Per et e t nig f r - ce ti a" t he name. tate the tran tre er rketch r1 nec.fication sti pent is :ade. tuffic:ent ta irspret

u. 4. 'a r test t::i a 3-3 Certificate of Cerliance ester 241 eust ac: m.ry '. rat sh rsent

~ 'I "' I & certificate or atstreent~of riterial

I'
M arut proc ers c en f s r* 6ec e \\s ra airest coe.

- ering tt e at t acles ent rteted N r 'r.cre. ft.4 Nyer Parts Trocure.s to $eller Part under. ?tla cost.fsette or restreer.t if u t.c r .. of c or.fors it'c e

nan t et:Tulite tN t the hu 4

' ell ** t m. 1 Lese cont rac ? ca f r re.'t asi J r:a w i n.f s, ter nn thie Cantrut on!! 'e inspecicJ s r.eci fica t t ors.ti.1 t he r a ppli c ia l e p g gg g,, decurestation. an evir vle of an.se c e r t - enced l'..y e r e rec i fic i t un, able scrtifica'e .c e titement s' c.* n - forrirce is an fo61 uet k.o quality Pra-AearJ."urvey "Thi s is t o c e r t t ry t e it ill iters "'I "*?',* 'I not*J on ruere ir a c aer M ter LJ T 1 I " ""' 'I*' "'I*I*"' ~ are in conarrainec e nth t% 6.etrict "'t"'"" rvreno.e era u, ar w n.-,. riuifu. tie r.4 apJ cthre stpl as sele J. s anepta-j ar rec t ion'd e p a r tr e* t."'"* I'""I'et II I 41.ty to Pr gg , r" r - r ~ t ein fic uine, " ". " "!. "i a . wi,enstfinte vr,i.it...nr, hen w etc survey rev t.,. e 1 9 c4 r- .i r s 'i n i e's t eJ by s n ne ' eit r e i r. e 't.t a = to -etual fatricit.on. if de ir af tive vf the.e t bt 's u.11ty c: irtr.nt .,1,,,,' a r 3,1 w e e. a tg,,, g,.,, g., 3,,,,,,,,, of r i t.l i : e r ch*J. or e.saa.steJ w, i.e,ry r m i.. m, certificate eu. t te it tar be t to t*, f n.,i t eir c he e t.i mi uc.*ersry *)ch rhlp= {) r.n t i, we o m reJ her niae,._, tq.gi onr,) Figure 2 90005281

Q. D. 8.1 C Page 6 RECE17I::G II CPECTICU PETORT 2/4/7e-(

>T, C f F_nV, b, u_

yter3y::3::::ncse:,p,t;ca: lC A uu v ENERGY SYSTEMS ru r c h,,, 0,3 e, :,,. Pe prt !;o. 1 De g ' t: 0 <: r :i fi c at t e re c : e r :r t t d ) frecificati ns i l 3peci ; Prc.: rices s f %.ee;ve r

n ah: :t.rt r 2

Tei c f j r.c part,, i r: r ec t ;or. Evi ce r.ee l Aru f w tura r 's hrt ' ue d.. r 3 _]3curce l !Kanuf ac tur e r 's

are/ Tr ace l'srk 1

l. o rk r.a r.s ni p/', w o c e 9

-. -. Serialized Ite-5, l 1C ] y_ ... Tah;e !'c. i S a c e ] i r.c for ccepictior. ef thir reyort: be c : pl e t e d "'*:'2 " o r "!T ". Instructior: The ten inspecticr. characteri: tic biceka urt i.nserted in the bloc'- f ollov.ic - the r.u t e r a :. All "YEC," .te..= m:11 be sup-port ed b;- reccrdf rc pertiner.t data in the field of th:. report. In 31citier., be recorded - ::c, s u r e r e r.t e, all i nst ec tion ch,r a:::oric tics veri fied : uc t d r r w i e.- r.cter, etc. i l i i 1 1 i t i n}1 ce rti ficati,ns or data required by dramir.c. s pecificc.tione er

6. Veri f y !!.a t purcha.:e order are received.

Review required ecrtifientions and data to arrure conf ere1nce wit! r equi r e:-c r.t r. 1 lia t e btnnp S J C n't t u r e

J

Q. D. 8.1 C Pa6e 7 PURCHASE OPCER & PECEIVIUG PE.oORT (LO'.'!ER SECTICN) b ~ ru;'.CH A! (m) Pact or ogot2 -.. -,...s..,..., Q,t,,o. 7, 6,,,,p+, '**dH W at**i .. ~. w --(..~ E L ew i S ws. L. ta d 6 $ 9 4' tse C L.J es Pus?.ea:,t C+;st e #40 Catt ca. 110 '.*.. T I'.'O.'3 UM H U ilM O.*.' LUM. f.tO ? tle n blO.*;i 231252 8720 TiLi X 0,7 780 cal,L C. T ELICES n;;,i r...

< ", min c'. rt v. 0: i; pa :23. UD *.", it:P! C? 31.7, d l' '.f, UC Ir.v'sti tr. i<Ja! Att ", PCr ;* ' ". f it t

$ HIP 10: TELEDYtlE EfERGY SYSTEf'.S TO 110 W W,'0';:U'.! K '3 TWCteUM, funYL A'.D 21093 L .3 P J m nwTL NO A/8100 r:,,u? & rd P AIO vl A PHtr.4 L,bN IH AC i 7.0 f luwu l y i t H'.a f.O u Ovts Or.o SI L L C ir5 5 HIP U AI L ' edG DATC IN f,P C C . ChsGIN A T CH ACCOUN I t.U. IE G N 40. ~ t..._____.

't

'a .e a. .g h.# 1 r} g I' t Y *. Confirnung telecon o< der of to l ) 1 s \\ Tite ATT ACliE D CC'.'E H AL PROVISIO";'; - ts APPLIC Al'LE TO AND BLCOT.'.15 i' Aill Of T11:5 PL8hCH.UE OHf:L li

4 cm r attua.u a i m e r.mto G s at a a nt voin s

soniu r m ov..c.4*htu... PURCitASI CRDER VALUC DUYE ft: RECIlvlNC AND !NSMCMON M PCU .i .~ m.. y....f _ _ t_. i,n ,s

rctivir.t; in ron t - cuat.n y r.a rnot.

EO-37 Figure 4 90005~283

9 [\\1 f"*g p F E p y!! KuniM1 s 0 U E. /PTELEDYNE ENERGY SYSTEMS L cALs L o Tillt: h EMPLOYEE SKILL CERTIFICATION Dinicir.'t t.0 tiEV OR!GGIED gy 9.1 E W. J. Coleman REWSICN CAlE RIViSED Sy. 3/7/79 E T. Charysgn _ GMCWAt IS%E CAIE j b/ // 2/16/70 RE'!!E7;ED BY ,fs 2;gfd FAUl I Cf APPROVED l 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summary This directive providus a system for employee skill certification.

1. 2 Purpose To identify the skills requiring certification, to establish a procedure for certifying employees, and to control the issuance l

of sid11 certification cards. 2. RE SPONSIBILITIE S Quality Encineering lg Quality Engineering shall schedule and direct implementation of 2.1 l I l the employee skill certification program, and shall be responsible for maintaining the records associated with the operation of the skill certification program. 2.2 Quality Control Quality Control shall be responsibic for the identification of employees performing o'perations requiring sid11 certifications and shall monitor the preparation of samples when required in i the certification program. 2.3 Personnel Personnel shall arrance to have vision tests administered to those employees specified by Quality Engineering. These vision tests shall be administered on a yearly basis. 2, 4 Encinee rinn / Manufacturing Engineering and/or Manufacturing shall be responsibic for identifying those processes which require the use of a certified operator in the applicable drawing and/or process specification.

O 90005284

Q. D. 9.1 E Pa e 2 3/ /79 2.5 Department Supervisor JCach department supervisor having certified personnel reporting to him shall be responsible for maintaining cognizance of employee .vorkmanship and activity in the certified skill; and shall participate i in the review of employee certifications with Quality Engineering. 3. ItEQUIREMENTS 3.1 Quality Encineering 3.1.1 Skill Certification Requirements Establish requirements for obtaining initial skill certification which may include some or all of the following: a. On the job training b. Preparation of sample specimens c. Completion of written examination d. Vision test 3.1.1.1 Define type and number of sample specimens required and evaluate their acceptability upon completion. 3.1.1. 2 krepare required written examinations and evaluate results. 3.1.1. 3 Arrange in coordination with the Personnel Department for the completion of necessary vision tests. 3.1.1. 4 Establish requirements for recertification as applicable (eg: Welding Qualification). 3.1. 2 Recertification Requirements Monitor operations to determine need for recertification based on any of the following: 3 a. Poor workmanship b. Initiation of new methods c. Inactivity in excess of the allowable time period. d. Established recertification requirements 3.1. 2.1 Periodically review work status of certified employees with their Supervisor to determine if inactivity limits have been exceeded and if acceptable workmanship levels have been maintained. 3.1. 2. 2 Review new and/or revised process specifications for possible changes affecting skill certifications. U 90005285

Q. D. 9.1 E Page 3 3/7/79 b 3.1. 3 Skill Certification Cards Issue skill certification cards (see Figure I) to those employees who have successfully completed the certification requirements of a particular shill. These skills include: packing insulation, welding, potting, crimping, soldering, penetrant inspection, welding inspection, soldering inspection, etc. 3.1, 4 Periodic Certification Review Review employee skill certification and update status at specified intervals (see Figure 2). 3.1.5 Certification Records Maintain records of the skill certification status of employees, f 3.3 Quality Control

3. 2.1 Requests for Certification Submit requests for employee certifications to Quality Engineering.

3.2.2 Preparation of Samoles Monitor preparation of sample specimens for certification tests when directed by Quality Engineering. 1 3.2.3 Workmanshin Report incidences of poor workmanship to Quality Engineering. 4. NOTES / APPENDIX 4.1 Figure s Figure 1 - Teledyne Energy Systems Certificate of Qualification Figure 2 - Employee Shill Certification Review Record s 9 90005286 U

e

\\ Q. D. 9.1 E e4 Pag /79 3 /7 ( i ' ' WTELD7(ITd me.EY SYSTD.G CUtilflCATE OF CUALtFICATION I ....s.,.......sm...-, fiel$ li10 G8f tfY fr,Af h&% 1UCCin8 4Lv Ef"*I8tD #L1819st%f% 8% 8d(M46 f D se Vilif KaisC4 4'x<S 08 Gehf Katiass Ril ntw a%8110.A vitis 10 Masone is )M(as 43 ss.its ai ssaicato eq<t sm%.isi, a.i,o n.. ig! Oukiff O'AtClivt 4 aa 804 CI A'If 6CAIl'a,FKtsuff f5ERL Inftle ,,c,,,0.. OttaflC41104 lL50 f004 40 Et'Ittif 6CAfl088 f.A letE' .a..,o s....,,e s. m. J s I 6E AL Illtis s,,,,,:...i.s, Q0'8 N Alis% int 50d'a %9 98sl0 to et at agal B A 6 elf? ,a...ovu o mu. i k Fig.1. Toledyne Energy Systems Ccrtificate of Qualification 90005287

~ l ~ - p s a. [ i i EiGLOYEE Skill CERIlflCATION REVIEW RECORD i E.*.7tCYEE * /a'i CEFT SLtERvCOn C N TY EAir.fAcf09Y Co?../ENis ItESPCNs'etE EN'WEERs:s CATE 5*!'L ITtt I ' E 'O g.,g.,, pj g P.0?*.?.x.O':P FDS PEV!EW ACU.J:1tecE*.'t?!T YEs

.0 YES f A0

~ 1 l t O O t O 1 Ln Ni Co - 00 co wO sd-a n o. s o i gwp ~ .,t l n ~ Fig.2 Employee skill Certification Beview Record I i ^ s a

yd,9 7\\[d i i li w [ ilOf p pp"M. Tf. "vPTELEDYNE ~ ' ENERGY SYSTEMS 6 ic TITLE: INSPECTION STAMPS i ClHECIM *iG HIV. DRIGif.A!LD Bf 10.1 C C. W. Rowe 1/27/76 J. K. Wenderot_h CRiGA!4 iSSLE CAIE i n ' '.. (A*/ REvill.E0 BY 11/10 /f o I i L. (. , swth FAGE i Of 3 AFfROVE0 1 1. SCOPE 1.1 Summary This document defines the system for procurement, issuance, control, use, and return of inspection stamps. 1.2 Purpose i l To provide a method that assures the proper usage of inspection stamps ty qualified quality Department personnel. j p 13 Peference Quality Procedure 10.0, " Quality Stamps" a. 2. RESPCI!SISILITIES 2.1 Quality Encineering Quality Engineering is responsible for the control of stamp design, purchase, and issuance. 2.2 Quality Control Quality Centrol is responsible for the proper care and use of issued stamps. 3 REQUIREME !TS 31 Quality Encineerinc 3 1.1 Procuremert o f Starns - Upon receipt of requert for a new or revised stamp, review with quality Manager for acproval. Prepare purchase requisition, including stamp design, for new stamp require-ment. Follow up for receipt of stamps and deliver to quality j Engineering Supervisor. I I 3 NOTE: Stamp design must not conflict with the design of other company issued stamps and they shall not contain customer designations. 90005289 l YO II

~ Q. D. 10.1 C Page 2 (A 1/27/76 Issue new or replacement stamps to qualified per-3 1.2 Issunnee connel. Maintain distribution control; list stamps by. type, serial number and perconnel to whom assigned. 313 Return - Receive sta=ps returned by Inspectors due to termina-tion, starp deterioration, etc. Assure return when need no longer exists. 3131 Irmediately confiscate and destroy stamps in deteriorated con-dition. 3132 Hold useable stamps for six month period before reissuance. 32 Quality Contrc-3 2.1 Reauest for Stamos - The quality Control Fuper isor shall notify quality Engineering of any need for a new stamp or re-vision to an existing stamp, noting the purpose for the stamp. care to prevent 3 2.2 Care of Stamps - Quality Control shall exercist loss of stamp to preclude unauthorined or improper use by any j person other than assignee. 3 2.2.1 Maintain stamps so as to provide legible markings or impres-sions when affixed to articles or documentation. 3 2.2.2 Use black ink for starping f.ocuments. 3 2.2 3 Notify Supervisor inmediately if a etamp is lost or if unauth-orined use of a stamp is suspected. 323 Instructions for Use of S tarps - Use assigned personal stamp to identify acceptance / status of material or articles which have undergone source or receiving inspection, in-procest inspection, end item inspection, testing, storage or shipment, and to validate calibration records and seals. 3231 For non-logged items, starps may be applied directly to articles or materials except when this is impractical due to physical limitation or when such application will compromise their qual-ity. In such cases, sta=ps shall be applied to identification tags or labels attached to articles or their containers. 3232 When a stamp is used to indicate acceptance of a test en a non-loCged item, note the test and any applicable test result ad-jacent to the stamp on the identification tag (i.e., hardneas check, penetrant inspection, leak test, etc.). { 3233 For logged itees, stamps shall be af fixed in the appropriate block for the inspecti step performed. 90005290

r Q. D. 10.1 C Pace 3 I ( 1/27/76 s' 3 2 3. l+ An Inspector shall, when necessary, void his original stamp the face of s tamp. The Quality by writir.g " VOID" across contacted if other inspectors' Control Supervisor will be stamps require cancellation. 33 Types o f Star.cs ,g,. i (q'g{lI Rubber - Used to stamp =aterial or parts when use will not 331 be harmful to stamped article, and to stamp dccuments or W, forms, decals, torque markings, calibration records, seals, etc. T' f.7 * ' Impressien - Used to stamp lead seals, parts when permissible, f 332 and tools. 1 f 6 9000529I l I Al /* s J}}

ML20125C201

Text

Reference:

Navigation menu

Search