ML20133D210
| ML20133D210 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 08/01/1985 |
| From: | Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dewitt R CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20133D214 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8508070260 | |
| Download: ML20133D210 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000155/1985010
Text
.f-
AUG
1 1985
Docket No. 50-155
Consumers Power Company
ATTN: Mr. R. B. DeWitt
Vice President
Nuclear Operations
212 West Michigan Avenue
Jackson, MI 49201
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. R. Hasse of this
office on June 3-7, June 10, June 17-21, July 9-12, July 17, 22, 24, and 26,
1985, of activities at Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant authorized by NRC Operating
License No. DPR-06, the discussion of our findings with members of your staff
throughout the inspection, and the summary of findings given to Mr. R. Alexander
by Telecon on July 26, 1985.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
This inspection was an in depth assessment of maintenance and QA activities at
Big Rock Point. Because your SALP maintenance rating has exhibited a declining
trend during the SALP 4 to SALP 5 period, the maintenance inspection was
augmented to assess the reasons for the trend and your actions to reverse it.
Our concerns relative to QA activities involved the transfer of responsibilities
from your General Offices QA staff to the site QA staff without a corresponding
-\\
increase in staffing and the revisions to your QA program implementing procedures.
While no violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of
this inspection, you are requested to respond within 20 days of receipt of this
letter to Unresolved Item No. 155/85010-03 in Paragraph 3.b.(1).a.1 of the
attached inspection report.
Your response should clearly descriFe those actions
you have taken and plan to take to ensure that the requirements contained in
deleted Nuclear Operations Department Standards (N0DS) are completely addressed
in other implementing documents and that the deleted NODS are not referenced as
"use" documents in other procedures. We also suggest that you give appropriate
consideration to the recommendations which are included in the attached
inspection report with regard to the other areas reviewed.
8508070260 850B01
ADOCK 05000155
,/ff)
a
s
.
.
Consumers Power Company
2
AUG
1 1985
Inaccordancewith10CFR2.)90oftheCommission'sregulations,acopyof
this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's
Public Document Room.
The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures
of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
,
&
'
Carl
. Paperiello, Director
Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure:
Inspection Report
No. 50-155/85010(DRS)
cc w/ enclosure:
D. J. VandeWalle, Director
Nuclear Licensing
D. P. Hoffman, Plant
Superintendent
DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
Resident Inspector, RIII
Rcnald Callen, Michigan
Public Service Commission
Nuclear Facilities and
Environmental Monitoring
Section
RIII
RIII
RIII
R
R y
RII
N/lc
n
s
e s
eriello
'
'
7/6/85
%
f
f