ML20202C889
| ML20202C889 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 02/02/1998 |
| From: | Dacimo F COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20202C895 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9802130067 | |
| Download: ML20202C889 (6) | |
Text
._________- ___ ______
o.n.nu.nueo, i a...e o nniun>
I#Mic (u in raung wthu, mn soro, m mua s.,yinn n m wes-wa s n. u Februar/ 2,1998 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atiention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 i
Subject:
Supplement to Application for Amendment of Facility Cperating Licenses NPF 11 and NPF 18, Appendix A, Technical Specification Changes to Relocate Fire Protection Requirements LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License f IPF 11 and NPF 18 NRC Docket Nos. 50 373 and 50 374
References:
(1)
R. Querlo letter to U.S. NRC dated July 15,1996 Application for Technical Speelfication Changes to Relocate Fire Protection Requirements, (2)
W. Subalusky letter to U.S. NRC dated June 19,1997, Supplement to Technical Specification Changes to Relocate Fire Protection Requirements.
Pursuant to Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Section 90 (10 CFR 50.90), Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed) submitted Reference (1) to revise Appendix A, Technical Specifications (TSs), of
)
Facility Operating Licenses NPF-11 and NPF 18 for LaSalle County Nuclear
/
Power Station (LaSalle), Units 1 and 2, respectively, to relocate fire protection requirements. Reference (2) was subsequently submitted to provide additional information. The purpose of this letter is to supplement y
g_
References (1) and (2) based on discussions during a conference call 4f6o between the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Project
/I Manager for LaSalle and Comed on September 12,1997. The NRC Project Manager had 4 questions, which are addressed below.
1.
The proposed change to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) page 9.518 states that tests and inspections of fire
,3
- ^ m protection systems will be identified in the Administrative Technical Requirements (ATRs). Where are the other items, such as fire brigade, discussed?
$ 2 g { O N $73 h
P PDR
~
All administrative controls for fire protection that are currently contained in the TSs, including the minimum required fire protection systems, limiting conditions for operat%n, compensatory actions, surveillance requirements, and minir.u 1 fire brigado staffing requirements, will be transferred to the ATRs. The ATRs associated with fire protection will be incorporated into the UFSAR by reference as shown on the proposed UFSAR change included in Attachment A.
This proposed UFSAR change is in addition to those already provided in Reference (2).
The proposed UFSAR revisions associated with this license amendment request are necessary to incorporate the fire proteeCon requirements Comed proposes to relocate frcm the current TSs..ito the UFSAR, either directly or by reference. The remainder of the fire protection program previously approved by the NRC, including the fire hazards analysis and major commitments that form the basis of the tire protection program, has already been incorporated, and has been maintained current, in the UFSAR as required by NRC Generic Letter 8610.
2.
The proposed revisions to Facility Opemting License NPF-11 Condition 2.C(25) and Facility Operating License NPF-18 Condition 2.C(15) reference only the original plant Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and its Supplemental Safety Evaluation Reports (SSERs). There are other SERs that are applicable to fire protection, e.g., Unit 1 TS Amendment 44. Why are these other SERs not referenced?
Facility Operating License NPF-11 Condition 2.C(25) and Facility Operating License NPF-18 Condition 2.C(15) will be revised to include all applicable SERs, i.e., not just the original plant SERs, but any additional SERs that have been issued that apply to fire protection. The insert for Facility Operating License NPF-11 Condition 2.C(25) will be revised to include SERs for Unit 1 TS Amendments 1,18,23,44 and this license amendment request, and the SER approving the use of Darmatt fireproofing material. The insert for Facility Oparating License NPF-18 Condition 2.C(15) will be revised to include SERs for Unit 2 TS Amendments 11,14 and this license amendment request, and the SER approving the use of Darmatt fireproofing material. The revised inserts are included in Attachment B.
3.
Why are SSERs 5,7, and 8 not listed in the title of Facility Operating License NPF-11 Ccndition 2.C(25)7 Facility Operating License NPF-11 Condition 2.C(25) does not reference SSERs 5,7 and 8 because those supplements did not exist at the time that Facility Operating License NPF-11 was issued. As stated above, the revised license conditions will reference all the applicable SERs. For simplicity, the title of the license conditions will no longer list the SERs.
4.
Explain why the entire footnote on TS page 6 2 was deleted.
4 The entire asterisked fconNe on TS page 6-2 should have not been deleted since the position "I adiation protection technician" is also addressed by the footnote. The footnote should read: "The radiation protection technician posi'. ion may be less than the minimum requirement... to fill the required position." The revised TS page mark ups are included in Attachment B.
This proposed supplement to the license amendment request has been reviewed and approved by On Site and Off Site Review in accordance with Comed procedures.
The original Significant Hazards Consideration, that was included in Reference (1), remains valid.
If there are any further questions or comments concerning this submittal, please refer them to the Perry Bames, Regulatory Assurance Manager, at (815) 357-6761, extension 2383.
Resp tfully,
/'
N.
Fred R. Dacimo Site Vice President LaSalle County Station Attachment cc:
A. B. Beach, NRC Region ill Administrator M. P. Huber, NRC Senior Resident inspector - LaSalle D. M. Skay, Project Manager - NRR - LaSalle F. Niziotek, Office of Nuclear Facility Sm'ety - lDNS
l STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
Docket Nos. 50-373 50 374 IN THE MATTER OF
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
)
LASALLE COUNTY STATION UNITS 1 & 2
)
9 AFFIDAVIT I affirm that the content of this transmittal is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
)
- (Ja Fred R. Dacimo
- Site Vice President LaSalle County Station Subscribed and swom to befor me, a Notary Public in and for the' State above named, this oc(
day of M/Aruaas/
. /998. My Commission expires on
/- 24~
, 2n o /.
V G m/
6//
efd f#//// U OTARY Publ A 0 UNOIS aeoc
= - - -
1
ATTACHMENT A Marked Up UFSAR Changes
LSCS-UTSAR
/*'
The shift engineer has the following dutiest l
1.
Assist fire marshal in preparation of Report of Fire, l
2.
Make reports to fire marshal on fire protection outages, fires and inspections.
d.
A shift foreman is the fire chief for the Brigade (all shifts), which
- laclude the following:
p 1.
a shift foreman (fire chief),
l 2.
at least four operators (Rad-Chem personnel respond with the l
fire brigade for first aid and radiation protection purposes).
Composition of the fire brigade is addressed in station administrative Procedure LAP-900-14.
l N
F l
I
\\ tSWg s 9.5.1.6 Other Administrative Reauirements All administrative controls for fire protection that were contained in the Technical Specifications, including the minimum required fire protection systems, limiting conditions for operation, compensatory actions, surveillance requirements, and minimum fire brigade staffing requirements, have been transferred to the Administrative Technical Requirements. Changes to the fire protection Administrative Technical Requirements are performed in accordance with the standard fire protection license condition (s).
cPottb LTF
../..m1.,f
..s.21.