IR 05000311/1987006

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:42, 7 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Exam Rept 50-311/87-06OL on 870213.Exam Results:One Candidate Administered Oral Exam Failed Due to Lack of Knowledge of Tech Specs Unique to Unit 2
ML20205E957
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 03/09/1987
From: Collins S, Dudley N, Keller R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20205E943 List:
References
50-311-87-06OL, 50-311-87-6OL, NUDOCS 8703310052
Download: ML20205E957 (2)


Text

-

_

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _

-

p.

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT EXAMINATION REPORT NO. 87-06(0L)

FACILITY DOCKET NO. 50-311 FACILITY LICENSE NO. DPR-75 LICENSEE: Public Service Electric and Gas Co.

P. O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038 FACILITY: Salem Unit 2 EXAMINATION DATE:

February 13, 1987 CHIEF EXAMINER:

II

/

3 - J-8 7 N. Dudley, Lead Reactor gineer Examiner date I!

3[9M7 REVIEWED BY:

R. M. Keller, Chref, Project Section 1C date APPROVED BY:

3-tmuif/(IdlnM

- 3hl67

'S. J. Coliins, Deputy Director, date Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects SUMMARY: One candidate was ad:ninistered an oral examination.

QU3kh k1

V

__

,

p

n

. *

I

'

,

,

k',

(

o *

e

.

.,

st,

,

,

,

b 9),

,

(;; (

',

'

'

,

,

'

.

REPORT DETAILS

.

\\

. -;

t.

l

.,

TYPE OF EXA'4: Replacement

'

*

,

i

.

-

g g

g.

,

CHIEF EXAMINER AT SITE:

N. Dudley

1 Scope:

\\

\\

.

'..

An oral examination was administered to one candidate to provide a basiscRor

'

issuing an operating license for Salem Unt: 2.

The candidate is presently'

licensed on Salem Unit 1.

l

-

.

Findings:

i;

..

t

.

}

, y (

u The candidate failed the examination due to his lack of knowle'dge of the Technical Specifications unique to Unit 2.

J.

\\

i

.

The facility procedure for granting access to the site er,d radid ogical< areas, for the NRC examiner, was expeditious.

Thepresentfacilityaccesspfocedure is a major improvement over the previous procedure. The candidate did not

'

havesecurityclearancetogainaccessto'thespentfuelpool,,whichbyhave

<

hampered his ability to properly prepare for the licensing exaltination.

No generic weaknesses were identified as a result of th,e examirsatiori.

Entrance Interview:

k

'

'

q

+

,

Mr. James Gueller, Operations Manager, was contacted and was provided with C brief outline of the reason, scope and expected durati?n of the oral examination.

.

j-s

\\

t h I

'.

i

,

s Ii

s s

\\

b

/

t f

'

a a

i g

\\

.

\\

.

- -- -

-