ML20357A102
| ML20357A102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/2018 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia Operations Branch III |
| To: | Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A385 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20357A102 (1) | |
Text
- Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Date of Examination:
Initials Item
~
- Task Description
~
a b*
c**
- t.
-'ii/
.. p OtH '
w b-.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with l ('
_R SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.
i -'
ctr}
j I
I T
Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
{.J 'i' Ir,~
~
T C.
E
- d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
-'i" Cf' ~I N
2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of I
normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major lf lctAt s
I M
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at C-f A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the
'{~
r>>t T
. applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
C.
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in
<f' Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including
- ,J
~
overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
L.
(3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
lf!
K (4)
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
1~
T (5)
The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
u (1)
The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
lf ~
G (2)
At least one task is new or significantly modified.
11 H
(3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1-J
<../
~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
I
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual
~
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
-r" l/
G Assess whethe_r the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
~.J E
- b.
l f1 -
N E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
-;{ {/
/!4IW'7.
R.
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.
- ;.,/
~
A L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
-r lf'
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO).
,, ' <-/J I~
,'oM. 0 r,~oted Name/~
Date
- a. Author
?.!N/!'I
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
z
.}1_.;tJ C.
NRC's Chief E_xaminer (#) ~~ - /'. ~
'1-17* I?
- d. NRC Supervisor
,[t, ).2(/HJ
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
ES-201, Page 30 of 32 d: I )Nile - -p. v*f arJ """