ML20234B298

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:21, 20 March 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Background Info on High Energy Physics Program & Proposed Stanford Linear Electron Accelerator Project, 1961 Rept to Joint Committee on Atomic Energy,Per Re Const of Reactor at Bodega Head.W/O Encl
ML20234B298
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 06/08/1964
From: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Mateker E
WASHINGTON UNIV., ST. LOUIS, MO
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709180351
Download: ML20234B298 (6)


Text

I

) ** 1

5. .

Distributions i

rl 8

' rormai- U D Omen;,a

  • Supple =entary AEC Public Document Room .

SAN Public Document Room u i

( W*'R,e '

bec: E. G. Case, RL

'M.,,-..,.a.

t M. -

ggGs0Tg J. Sullivan, RD3 $.M ('  !

geekst 3., p G. Hadlock, CGC grp$;g 7 C. T. Edwards, REG q, a4.g #, ,

JUN 8 9 64 1

) Mr. Een d. Natcher ,

i Ameisteet psefoemer of Goephratee

_ f~ . ,1 Weeklagten Baiversity '

Departammt of Earth seteness

] St. Assim, Riesouri 6M3

. 3 ..

. . .g.:- .

p W IEele8Hr M ,

.. *:yy *

,(Mt Ibie DepIAes $68 M h of M Se Ik h to k. j motleese armeee, 5. 4. Osent and esodette survey, separtment et

.i :gj Goemereo. Br. Ernese referred peer letter to this offies as a "f~f matter skisk the Atende Ilhersy n==i=*= earrectly has under r

~ ." q .,

' semaideraties. 44 the oogenet of the Atente Energy e a e .

and la 'eemmeeties eith its revise of the applicatism amteitted

~s.2 tr Pasifie Gas and Electric Ceepacy for'a liessee to construst j

~. s:r.a a toester at Bodega Esade the 5. A Seest and Goodotte server

@},5 has been maked ny the Ass to prepare a sepert rotative to the MW4 **I""I*itg of %he f ,:Z'_ eite. b report hee met yet h

m. g ashoitted. We e111 Safees yes at ameh time se && se semilable QRgby, 'J. for distri h n;.;

.f O *J Q. , - m 0

  • 74' g ; * ' ., .,.

$d.; wm '

'7

  • ~

Lg5f;.

3 .

?.i.M Senseeming the N**8amete of the h Andress inalt to the sh p'gs: feed lineer elastrea ===%4er. I as emelmeing a espy of a 1961 m7 Soport to the delat eeneittee es Ateele anergy, iddek yes uGL ~

..,a sina safermative em that enhjeet. , , ,

' sinnersar, Griginal Signed t>y J

L c. cake 8709180351 851217 PDR 3 dens & Como. Aetias Diretter ES 5--665 Divielen of Roseter Lisemaing

%wm i ensleenres

*aseksressa 1mferenties en f I the aish amerst Phreies GVi@N trHM,3.3 presres ena The ._,x:: 4% 42

+ a. c.,4 u , n t,s. _

9r ~

+ - - e-o,ny ,,

m eterat e Projoetta_ v/ (/g ,

, ou & ,, C# 1hdstpg GH F e[ .

i

,Q ,, L!MS/64 6/k64

  • 6/i-/64 ,

== ao-m m . c* _

,mi4 J

~ ,

_+

o a Nuclear Powcr 'Tylyt 'yc Editor-It would terribly weaken

  • the arguments of the Bodega plant proponents to admit that our op-position has primarily been on points of conservation. The safety '

g eOch e,tJo issue has only come to the fore .ODO Chance 6%g,'/ '

more recently, and is based on the

- Bodega Head location only. The Editor--PGas,8 Plam t a nuclear build proponents rather make the con 1 #9' venient but inaccurate blanket in- ' Head seem au h # #'

dictment that we oppose all atomic Irresponsibility' Hasn Power per se. ' to these men that th

!r the meanwhile, to paraphrase

, to be wron

.' tions? . . .g ONCE $ in t efr calcut

  • Mr. Feeney (Letters, April 30), One hundred '

PG&E has failed miserably to ex. . safety should be the goal of a $

plain, one extremely important in. lic utility. One wonders how this consistency: If atomic plants are can possibly be guaranteed con.

sidering the location PG&E h '

the future, source of supply for the chosen.

steacily inc easing demands of PAUL BOLER.

power, and if the Bodega site is San Francisco

  • the only feasible spot for it in this '

~

area (as claimed by PG&E), where

, are they going to put any more of ,

. these future atomic plants that we will need? . . . .

MARGRITA F. KLASSEN:

Sonoma.

.J '

(

e amo d *** . , .

E>

m ==i i .

b2 *

$M O bh m R r-co a L'

g ng p,.

A, o

5E gg _

en u

9 9

e

  • k, 4

1.

.m., -5 .. e ,-- -

e  : z,' yo i

'e l

, ,- ;. ..r .

--- . - - , , no

v p

w ,

.40 4.c?S [r g

  • MEMO ROUTE SLIP Ptyrrn A MC*tra (Rav. May 14.194?)

5+m m m-Nota End rteven.

**""$a**

For algnttur3.

) _ ' ' '5e"*a/

For inf ermeAio*.

  • ' TO (Nims and unit) minALS AF.MAAX$

Jos Doeshard, SN, M Ah ase tus Bodass mW team Easters to

  • I .

un the Editer, S.F. Cheenisla, 3/15/M.

i Mesold Pries. MS, W -

j 0 (Nam unit) MTIALS RENAAKS

[ .. g

)

a_ s -

, ,/ un . .

F. L Pittman, 353, M t

TO (Name ong unit) M11ALS REMAAK3 J. B. Seman, Ort, 4

=# g

un f

e R. W. autth, engt, b, mas G

i FROM (Name and unit) ADIAAKs m.

.p hate J. seek A. -g .

Aest. Emes. ettsmer I l 5

.- I m~ A. ruonn na om N. 5. . .

h h p et.

  • l** QR QQ Q& py p & gy

. . n. - .

,h E. *

'-*'** ** " ' " ' "****.m~.eb4

\. ,, , ,=

...M,,.e.~*.

.e. o s-...

  • 4 -

. .i J.. . . - ,., m.

. ,,- *.4._~**r,,._~-e..

.n ,,,,,-..,- _--

_,w_y-* .., ,.,_7; ..

,u~, . .=. .*

y .._..,, sn

_- =

jg..t'.,,m.,y. =

-,,l*,,

ma

.n

+

...c. .:'*%.--.._. c,. +% .u ,,.2,.,, ...,.t.....: s. ,

e ,,

,,k ,*

M-m ,,,7i./a*4* w" 7 N ;'v, ,Dn.-

.idc /.2.bm=C"'*% ** "*". '*;.W;F.Q.;'*"$  ;'C e~%.Z.

~'~%..~ . '* N~*n" ' M"'A * ". . @,,,-q' f"*I- . . ' * *.

.c. . . . ~.~n ..m :g g.,.s, ., g,. e -.a ,,~. .,,,,~~,g.* u,~. ..e . - . .m.

w h.r; .,.g_-r-.,.

, gy. . . -~= . - ~.-* -.m . ..  :.~... .--.. ~ .~%.g%,. .%.s.; s.%,,

g y,_m,$,,,.S O. .,av. ..q e: s 9.; n,y.. . r g,

~

    • ...:. 4, y ,. y.

a ;go,  :=== ~-gy ' - _ .,,

,... .g p dWCW. M' . wtR",- _ . g'fgg.-g.%,.m > . .w@ ~r..a. w =sq.* ----_ ?g g.a m... v ;. wnpy W **%,e*;.,-w_ == .cc ._.s. A-- wwc s.e .~gs.n.q ,m, x ,-- Aw;r

.m; .z,-.,,p ~ .gn.:+ .q .m<..+c.~." -u r.- ..w-::w;~u. M. .

a.-

u. -!.y p m-ma,f,g4;; w.:. -r

. ..x gy~x.5 g.cwc.33 4 y

_ ,f ; m . , q g; .,. a %, ; 9.-  % , g, ,.y;.,,c,p=wy?g.

3

.. .,p. ~ . g se 7-' .,Lc;

_, x; ca..g c... ,

% e. . . ~

QN JM 7E e I. .g

.'Q7 eT6M
  • v' d n ;.4

[. 4

.IS . g'**

imed. ^ .

.M. g 5,

"-' e.+w .'Q W

p 9 g e- e

)**, .

  • p..

-b""'++g.ep. wae." %,'.'M ....rm Jw a,s...QW*'m. *.y. 7

-w... ,,.mw a w,, . gf.,'+,*;%,

i s.

.. A%'=i v .u .d*. 4 6.cw m--

- t gy - n w; g . . , . ,c y 77 }

g - .

D.'a

D. _- . I,,...y - p .. ,.,. j_ _g . ._ .. , _ . . - ,

fbM g.'8'rNkh.

M; ,p= .. -;.

-[. ,$ e...%

b. ..,W.

_AC..4.*-m

, p. .***N.

.,,,,q .% ...3 . .= .

s., m*Nb *: m ,m

/ 7

.m wp'"%,.sv.i s.

,%N.*N#[M w

I 3

. *** '*.e.', . d_ . % ," - . ...,,; _ " . : . . m , -, ,_ . ,..s* .). h_ . m' *' _ _, _ Cm'._..a.d

?

~

.'. h__.. l

. ',.m

..;~,=~-/*** ~. ' !}

c

c.a h* f"2.,. ,,jg 1*a",* . ' f7.I.,', .

.4"'* *.*A* ,.[ar. 7 .-

.M,. 2'*--8 ,

,. 2 0.EA.q. T::.r,. ' <,' [_- . == . y.n. :," ~.- u. . _k.. ..;,J*',

. -* , , , ~ ,., .Q,.,:i.r.*.,,d%I .m=,,*A~.7.,.,.*c .; - :.=,,,,-

w e

. .. ..,f ,.e...

61.A ,::. .,.,, ' , 9.aMT..

.. ,-- , . ..e* . , , _,

., .-~~w v.,;

+* wm ' p*Tr

',.r.. , r& Vesr . +4*A..s hywCys .,***y.% '+...'y

._y . - . ,qt% ,a '"l*" ,,g =. n a.

..m

,...,,.,,J.aJ.e.-.=._'.

,e=,,.-<

'**7

.s @ , .;r.

.m 2,',Fr",._J!a***.r.*._"'*.

. . .-- ,- ,..Lf. v, D g ** S;' , .) , *' *

-.p[

' ' * :" * . . . , * , . ..'.'*r%

a,.-.

'I

.* '*I 1 .~se.,,,.. U

,. "'I h* " . '

.*]., ..aj[ ,,

' ,,p

_ mv' ' * * ",

,,' .' M. e. g. ., . , . . .,%, , b. ,%*. .a r y,,3 .,, . . ,s. p % -a  % ow .e ur. Q.6.e , , .s l,,,,g gy g ,,,,,,g. ga. *

?,,,g y,,,e.n L,,y,e,.g,p.,,,,,

.- - . . - - . . . . . j

.,.,,,o~. -

.. .-* L v- * -. g.-** ,-

s 4 . ,- r

,,,g.

1 u

  • s ** + ~.-CE:-k f, t

I I

6 s

e

'e .

N

.a P.l

-2

? ? ? _A ~ ' ~' '

^ ~~ ~~

. , - a q

.s-j e- ._ ,

= - - . -

l a ,.

., + '

O

>r * .  ;

f !i i

l' i I

]

< e

..~v..

=

Arh,de: Mi!s A .my. nard;

~

l PG&E A< % / ksayWJ J/~/2./(t/s 'Sundage'

,$ 'A  % k i i By DON ENGDAIIL ,

fio reactor sessel to PG&E's 4

, The possibilities of a disas.

calculation of'a " maximum I trous earthquake caused radla.

credible accident"in the plant,

, tion accident at the proposed

Bodega Bay nuclear power plant compares it to a IM7 Atomic are explored in a publication by Enctgy Com
r.!ssion study of the St. Louis Citizens Commit. major accidem. and emeludes:

i ,

! tee for NuclearInformation. -In the " uni:kely but possi.

The searing criticism of the b!e aftuation" of a westerly or i Pacific Cas & Electric Co. smithwesterly wind at ihdega . ,

power plant proposal was re. Iread, "ncar'y overyonc" in Bo.

! f leased today - and produced de14 Bay "would c;c within the as scaring a reaction from a first day." -

l utilities company spokesman, -In Sar,ta Itosa "many of j who called it " astounding for (Continued on Page 10, Col 3) ')

, its deceitfulness . . . sabotage."

, . The magazine, Nuclear Infor.

L mation, deals idth the possibill. ,

j ty t'.at an earthquake along the .

! 4 San Andreas fault zone near the site might cause release of radiation.

I It warns that " innumerable i

variables intervene to decrease or magnify any reactor accl.

dent," and says not , enough  !

l data is available to accurately .

predict results. i But'It adds the splitting of i

,6 l l

b l l

,, l 9

l '

l  ;

[

U a . ..

~3 sl g 'i n -


~-7.----~~~-'~~~-'-~~~~~'

' 4.

y Cel k & , h J.@ rN 9 < mD4em ep' .g.s wemen gh ae d 'd.ng_- gu.4T.s 8.45 18e git h eng

, , = j

'*"#' s j '

) l 1 .

. l i

! Article Ram.. s A-d. ant Siter J L

i PG&E Replies:' Sabotage'  : Live vessel, releasing' products'commodate limital shifting of the (

)

5 (Continued from Page I) (

underlying bedrock. l the people exposed would be of nuclear fission to the atmos. I i Although the company empha-very cisco, with sicir." and in Uie "more San Fran phere.It is critical of PGLE for not,s' zed it does not e likely" L

'condidon of a northwest wind evaluating the results of such an' movement if ' any occurs it't and a temperature inversion accident la its application to the

-ondition that would trap re- AEC for permission to build the "would a fractionnot of anamount inch," thc to more than!

leases, the article speculates plant. amendment says an "Incredi.il . ,

j that some would be !!!, there It reviews statements by some b!c" one-foot movement wouldo' mean no damage or impair. I would ,be long. term radiation geologists-including a t e a m cffects, and finds the "sugges- from the U.S. Geological Survey ment of function and even with tion" that crops would have to --that a IWmagnitude earth- a two foot movement the reac-tor suppression system wou!d re-be destroyed and agriculture re- quake might produce shifts of main inact .

stricted "for distances of hun- rock of Bodega Head itself, and I says it is " unreasonable" not The ' Nuclear Informadon ar.

5

  • dreds of miles."

ticle says "an expert in earth P t

The SL Louis group is de- to consider an earthquake as a quake resistant structures saidl i l

scribed as a committee of " credible cause of the maximum the techniques for (protecting tho u j l 9 scientists and laymen; the Bo- credible accident" to the plant. reactoM had been developed un.h l l k dega article was written by It is "also unreasonable," the der AEC auspices and the im.,1 1

.Lindsay Mattison, a layman, article says, to " rely on the fact l

and Richard Daly, holder of a that all the radioactivity will be p riant informatica about ite re-lb l mabs class!fied."

,mastcr's degree . In electrical contained in the intact drywell."

engineering and. with a back- (The drywell, as defined by Mr. Stroub says it is PG&E's)J ground as an assistant mathe- PG&E, is the steel shell sur., concept, that it is "not radical matician at the Argonne Labor- rounding the reactor, p'us as,'or unusual," and called the ar,"ci f ticle's statement " ridiculous."

atory. Both are magazine staff sociated pumps and piping.)

Mr. Stroube said today that The artic!c says, after discus-

. members.

the reactor "will be designed sion of the possibility of radio i The article was reviewed and

] approved by the publication's so carefully that even under the active releases from the plant.0 severe earthquake action that with "such an accident pos Y a

most l

scientific advisory board, made

., 1 up of 25 scientists. that scientists expect it would sible, and in fact made more A l I ( not breach and release fission 3 products."

likely by the siting of the Ba f dega Reactor . . . PGLE's case i PG&E Itcacts. 8 I Hal Stroube, PG&E press rep- What the authors of the ar. before contested the AEC will not be un/

ticle are doing, he said, is "pos-resentative, called the article a The issues, it says *must be tulating an accident which w!Il F " completely one sided review of given the most deep and scarch I s

  • not happen."

l the Bodega situation . . ." The article, however, s a y s ing attention by experts of com b '

The w r ii e r s "never ap- ,,the hazards of such an acci- plete integrity. The public mustjE proached PG&E and asked for dent m u s t be evaluated not facts or explanation . . . the avoided .

be ly the fully risksacquainted involved for them with exact.h' article is astounding for its de- m such a project." lp ceitfulness. It is biased and in. R w Des.ign In 'an editorial note on The flammatory . . ..a clever and l

dangerous sabotage not only of It deals also with a recent:

PG&E amendment to its appli-l Peaceful Atom, the magazine the Bodega project but by ex- cation that oIIers a %shn tension, of the nation's civilian wecon-l balance poses theofproblem the value a nu- of "How can cept" for bedding tne reactortclear operation against the risk atomic power program, all done on sand and surrounding it with of possible harm, and thus ce/

with a pseudo scientific air of a compressible material to ac- cide whether the project is wor:h authority." ~ ~ ~

The heart of the Nucicar In- doing "

formation argument is that an .' It says an "indepcadent evalua-carthquake might result in a t'on of the benefits of a nuc' car,

[ breach of the reactor's protec . power -p1a n t, over and abovej

- i those plant is also of needed."

a conver.tional pov.cr'l 1 ,

f i

,l

. qj s

3 - .. _

il

.y .

....y.. . ., ,, _ _

a

~ _ . . . .

L '

i 8QeVF k MEMO ROUTE SUP Purm A EC.98 (Rev. May 14,196D d _,

5** r= **vma-Note and return.

_ Fw aacum ,,) _

F* ac*C D For sfreature. For informeMoa.

a TO (Name sad unty MTIA&.3 REMARK 5 M , M,% 13 3 --

alim "---

bh haama n C--

, Press menosant of 5/12/ M. i besold Fries, ans, sg r 70 Ujem,e seio unitt - MrnALS M MARG 3

, leb4rt /

h==*=dy-ans , ag e. ,. ,

1 e / _ c> .u s

== ~

n . t. ,

n y?,

F. E. Pittamm, MD, at TO (Name .nd unty W

r., ,. v- -

n f pena &S me K3 '"

(

\

-s.._._-

' i E. B. Eyman, tr1. 30 r y <.- t q i

me 3 M~,- l 2yr _. a 4 mn I

- n o e  ;

L W. Smith, Canyt V., sut -

j IE M u raou cN.m..nonio e l I umKs d Bete J. Cook

- ~: :1. Aset. Kate. ettleer , .

      • 'I t t

++=,,., e #

j s

  • E90fE IKk (NAM '

Y N i

[ USE OTHEM SADg rgR ADC4TIONAL REMARKS

v. s. .-_----um mornus e,m , no ma,
  • e% .

, .+,w +.m E + . 7' ,~~T*"*Uw-

_.. 'w- .. * ***. C "J' **-* '-, - ' ' + - 'r- --

,,,T' .,.a.

. ' . ' , , , . . . ' ' +**,,- ..,- a==.4 ".~e,,,"a.-..*.4, 4* # .* e- *** 'i f*j ---' '

.,e f * ,7 (

T*. - **, . * )

. ._eg=.r j,. .., 4m . -== .

Q.-- 4

. , _ . . .O98; ***;,* L ,, j~'**"' . , 7t* '~ $ ,, .? '. *~~..,_.",,,,,~;,,...,,.,.1_,,-.'.e.-*Q.,g'.g w =a - r

. 4. ;,_. .,4.- .r

  • D8*. 7 # . w

,g.. . , ..

, ,* *E3W 'y." .# 't . 4.us .d A e'%.e. *."* ' -4 i %

~ .ppi. da

.w'55. ##^*'aQ'#

^IN-g 88'g"

'I * ^

J '

+- E ., g= ==*ar. . -.'" . .% 4en, 4. .T 3.".*r,e. e gNg **'4"'$ ^ ^^ . i

%.h** .. .

%,g,,g.77.%

- T@' aad ".D .* *4$ 8

  • wp-~@e,.- .s. n. ,. . .. . - -

,.= m, ; + P;- ".' e,.J. R. , ;; ;.,v._, .i,;Acr* .y*". g:r.'.*. - .

u .n.~=%.

. . ~.w_ _;.:2,;,m.e

ggf .,,

a.~ c-% _e L.-,,;;,,

.s A grd.'2 t.~ -.we.~ . .,.e. ;. .= w%+4r-M ,.... 7 ae :.n

- - .* n~ ."m.-'.e.

x;:.

, u.-.. - s.-mu . m::- n,- .="- ,

  • ':;V-~, ~ W m. .,,,..

- - =&. t ..g *= . :.~, - -

< -^ '

h , %.p Je s . .' . v"'

d'

  • O y y .'.

_ .5 . . Yuh g,

  • 4 i- ,,e.

_a +6N<-+ ** *, t. eN .. . g .

pp f& [ *gg ,W

.~- . b..***e..%,..*

u6 - - -

-%ra $.s. = '.

+-.e a - 4,. , , ...~r,;,g

        • 3

'7*mg,,,,,,..

M .wJ, ' m wa- sysip er* e se..eA 9then.. ., #, .y#.[Em" W

L' h.,re,se,,,m,,

y'4.

    • A8'e m

,m.me, d

e, , 4,,a w *GA' .a 88*  %

g.6,,*-}ia Mt .wpe.T,,,,, g.. y . .., .,, , ,, , ,

e,.,

, f. . , , ,,.,f,,;.r_

~ja*e.,~m.,- j.q *

.pg , garged .=;W , *

  • q,,,,g $

i

.~..,,"**

. .. g; . ,p ;a;Q,,g,, . _ , , , , ,,,. , , , , . . , , , , , , ,

f*'*

  • f:

.--= **' ,; , lnawas ,,,,,y  ;;,p****an,,,;,~"%ew=, ,,c..do **-* - ,

g .v.4, &.* i

.;, .,- ** . - - = .wd
  • .~.e.., ' " * '

. . ~;. ~

.~.'a. -?-=r e~ ~: n w .. -- ~ ~**

..4. 9=1"M"*.,,.:ty, ,J4F *d*';, am . . . W.p,P * * ,,,, .?  %.. c .m... , =~==,

- .+%., W .. . ~; , , MN....*i.m*. .- --

-- . ~.m.sa ,wm Jp .3,,, 4 ,mer e * . . +,

} 1*#. - 4. sed e q .

  • =*.e .v' . 48****'*2+ ., -**
  • * -* . d ***N S,W*  ?. W Y-
  • f $K * . P' ^ . i f .- b

~

?'  ;*k;_. ; .u : e2.Q; c'T  :..r 1,:'g~.k.. -#. . ~ n ~. Y .x .*.: x,e.~ P+.A. n'**: .r, .: ..

f.  :. ~. , :: :. ;-

,:?.r:=:.

w~.-.. .:. *: .-  ;, . ., . .x 2 --, * . .1,

, - 77* 4. s.=.~ mi.c. ~, .e.,

- A ;g;

'****- ,y ' 'T"S m -

3 " .,3 .

~ . , , , , , , , ^

. - - , ,,n.. e

-4

-R-,. g. ,. .. ;% . -. . , , . . .-

~.

3 -~ ~1 . ,T ' ,:.

a y -- . :; -~ .

- - - e

.s ...

e,.

~ , , , , , .

.. 7 ..,

8

.. , ,y

,,e k

. ~-

.:~~ ..

c . .;; .. 'M -- .-.=-.+ - ...w. ' N =' ' '

  • -r**.-

. - . - .v... -

g pg

_ y

.- **e s a y .'yMr "

-9

  • g 4-
  • '#- e++ 4.P'

, , , . +

. ,_ ,n_- - .

(. . . - - ---,

I 4

l l

l

, I t

  • n ,
  • 9 ,

9

.p l . '