ML20083R084

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:02, 18 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ro:On 720628,during Routine Analysis of Radwaste Outside Tank,Activity Found Exceeding Tech Spec Limit.Caused by Overflow of Waste Neutralizer Tanks During Regeneration of 1-7 Condensate Demineralizer.Procedure Modified
ML20083R084
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 07/11/1972
From: Finfrock I
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Anthony Giambusso
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20083R087 List:
References
NUDOCS 8303310373
Download: ML20083R084 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _

p q l O ,q V l h >5 Jersey Central I awer & Light Company u l

l i M ADISoN AVENUE AT PUNCH BOWL RO AD e MORRISTOWN. N.J. 07960 e 539-6111 l

July 11, 1972 r1SN1/

l 1 .g> '~ Oy Mr. A. Giambusso h~O <.~

! Deputy Director for Reactor Projects f ( ,. CJ Directorate of Licensing L.

United States Atomic Energy Commission . ' , ' ' Il[ld3 g g l Washington, D. C. 20545 dp 53.rume: m g,g -

Dear Mr. Giambusso:

rhj$ ,//

Docket No. 5 -219 @

Subject:

N l Oyster Creek Station

( Outside Radwaste Tank Activity j The purpose of this letter is to report an incident that- ,

l occurredatOysterCreekinwhichtheoutsideradwastetankactivity) ~

exceeded the total activity limit of 10 curies as set forth in l Technical Specification 3.6.C.

Routine analysis of the radwaste outside tank activity, as required by Paragraph 4.6.D of the Technical Specifications, was made during the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. As confirmed by final analysis',

, which was completed at 9:30 p.m., a total of 12.78 curies were present l at the time of sampling. 10.48 curies were contributed by the contents of floor drain sample tank A.

The source of this high activity water was traced to the /

, _ overflow s of waste neutralizer tanks A and B during regeneration of (

~

l l-7 condensate demineralizer. Tank space in the waste neutralizer

! tanks had been minimal when completion of _l-7 co"densate demineralizer resin regeneration became necessary due to high differential pressure developing across the condensate demineralizers./ In attempting to continue the regeneration, both waste neutralizing tanks overflowed to 1-9 floor drain sump in radwaste. The concentration of activity

in this water was quite high as a result of it being regenerate pater from the 1-7 condensate demineralizer. Floor drain sump 1-9 j-pumps directly to the floor drain collector tank from where the water was processed through the floor drain filter and into floor drain saaple tank A.

al'),

bY 8303310373 720711

~

'M"' /'

PDR ADOCK 05000219 8 PDR _

~

e .

9

^ p

.Q y Mr. A. Giambusso Page II July 11, 1972 Floor drain sample tank A was routinely cycled into the waste neutralizer tanks as space became available during'the 8-4 shift on June 28, 1972. Back calculations indicate that the activity -

in the outside tanks was less than 10 curies by 3:00 p.m. and in fact, was 1.54 curies by 3:30 p.m. ,f When calculations of the outside tank activity were completed late in the evening, the water remaining in floor drain sample tank A was transferred to the waste neutralizer tanks inside the radwaste facility.

In order to prevent a recurrence of this event, the condensate demineralizer regeneration procedure is being modified to require a positive verification that adequate radwaste tank capacity exists.-

prior to starting a regeneration.

We are enclosing twenty-five copies of this report.

Very truly yours, Ivan R._Finfr k, .

. Manager, Nuclear Generating Stations IRF/pk Enclosures cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director Regulatory Operations, Region I

~

e s