ML020250090

Final - Operating Section a (RO & SRO)

ML020250090
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/04/2002
From:	Wilson M Dominion Nuclear Connecticut
To:	Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB
Conte R
References
050-423/2001-302 IR-01-302
Download: ML020250090 (122)

Text

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Millstone 3 Date of Examination: January 7-10, 2002 Examination Level (circle one): SRO Operating Test Number: A-1 Administrative Describe method of evaluation:

Topic/Subject 1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR Description 2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1.1 Execute JPM Determine the effect and response to degrading Intake conditions Procedure using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

Steps (GEN 2.1.20) (41.10/43.5/45.12)

A.1.2 Review an JPM Review an Estimated Critical Position.

Estimated Critical Position (Sys:001, SRO: 3.9 A4.10)

A.2 Tagging and JPM Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, Clearance review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

Procedures (GEN 2.2.13) (41.10/45.13)

A.3 Review and JPM Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste discharge Approve permit.

Release Permits (GEN 2.3.6) (43.4/45.10)

A.4 E-Plan JPM Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager.

Actions (GEN 2.4.44) (43.5/45.11)

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

JPM ID Number: SRO-A1.1 Revision: 1 II. Initiated:

10/31/01 Date I1l. Reviewed:

f Ray Martin I771ZOJ+/-VL 11/15/01 Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date

/oý //(6 Nucl dar Training Supervisor Pa 1 of 12

ADMIN JPM SRO-AI.1

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES RE: NRC VALIDATION Removed steps 2-10 as they related to a YELLOW/YELLOW condition.

Moved step 11 to the step 2 position.

Deleted cue at old step 10 as the Circ Water pump trip follows immediately.

Deleted the "Initial" initiating cue Changed validated time to 5 minutes.

Made OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions, a required material Added OP 3325A, Circulating Water, as a General Reference

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: SRO-AI.1 Revision:

Task

Title:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

System: Intake Structure Time Critical Task: ) YES (X) NO Validated Time (minutes): 5 min Task Number(s): 341-01-107, Response to degrading intake conditions.

Applicable To: SRO X RO PEO K/A Number: GEN.2.1.20, Ability to execute procedure steps K/A Rating: 4.3/4.2 Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: In-Plant::

Task Standards: Response to degrading intake conditions Required Materials: SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination, Rev. 7 OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions, Rev.

7 General

References:

OP 3325A, Circulating Water

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: SRO-AI.1 Revision: 1 Simulator Requirements: NONE Initial Conditions: You are the Shift Manager and the unit is experiencing degrading conditions at the intake structure. The Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is keeping SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination current. The last surveillance was done at 0800 and indicated a plant factor condition of YELLOW, an environmental factor condition of YELLOW.

Initiating Cues: The "B" Screen Wash pump has just tripped due to an electrical fault. Maintenance estimates 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to restore the pump to operability.

Wind speed, from Met. Tower data, has increased to a steady 27 mph.

The re-calculated surveillance indicated a plant factor condition of RED, an environmental factor condition of RED.

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

I- 3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations I

(i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-AI.1 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

Start Time:

EXAMINER: Give candidate the completed copy of SP 3665.2 & the MB6 sheet.

STEP 1 Performance Step: Review SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination (0800).

GRADE Standards: Review SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination relative to the description of plant and environmental conditions and understand the current condition.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 X Performance Step: REVIEW OP 3215 procedure steps and determine which are applicable with the plant factor condition "RED",

OR the environmental factor condition "RED". (step 4.5)

GRADE X Standards: Evaluate factor conditions and returns to procedure section 4.5 Discuss the following:

"* NOTIFY Intake Structure Coordinator and Operations management of the conditions affecting the Intake Structure

"* RESTORE maximum steam dumps and atmospheric dumps to service

"* COMMENCE continuous trash rack cleaning

"* OPEN trash trough trap door if necessary

"* OPEN Plexiglas inspection doors at backside debris trough to monitor debris spray and carryover

"* EVALUATE the condition of the following systems

- Steam Dump System 4 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A1.1 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

- Condenser Vacuum Systems

- Screenwash Systems

- Service Water Systems

- Circulating Water Systems Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 x Performance Step: Monitor conditions in the following systems (step 4.6)

• Steam Dump System

• Condenser Vacuum Systems

• Screenwash Systems

• Service Water Systems

• Circulating Water Systems GRADE Standards: Discusses the need to monitor systems affected by intake challenges Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 4 Performance Step: IF circ pump amps, discharge pressure, and condenser delta T indicate the waterbox is fouling, Refer To OP 3325A, "Circulating Water," and PERFORM backwashes (setp 4.7)

GRADE Standards: Discusses the need to perform backwashes during intake challenges Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 5 x Performance Step: IF the circulating pumps in the same condenser bay are lost, TRIP the reactor and Go To EOP 35 E-0, "Reactor Trip or Safety Injection" (step 4.9) 5 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-AI.1 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Determine the effect of changing intake conditions and respond to degrading intake conditions using OP 3215, Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions.

GRADE x Standards: Candidate determines that A & B Circ Pumps ARE in the same condenser bay and decides to trip the reactor.

Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

6 of 8

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: SRO-A1.1 Revision: 1 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): 5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

7 of 8

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: SRO-AI.1 Initial Conditions: You are the Shift Manager and the unit is experiencing degrading conditions at the intake structure. The Shift Technical Advisor (STA) is keeping SP 3665.2, Intake Structure Condition Determination current. The last surveillance was done at 0800 and indicated a plant factor condition of YELLOW, an environmental factor condition of YELLOW.

Initiating Cues: The "B" Screen Wash pump has just tripped due to an electrical fault. Maintenance estimates 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to restore the pump to operability.

Wind speed, from Met. Tower data, has increased to a steady 27 mph.

The re-calculated surveillance indicated a plant factor condition of RED, an environmental factor condition of RED.

8 of 8

SSurveillanee For.m Generic Inf =ormation o IPr Rev.-No.

Form Title Intake Structure Condition DeterminationI 008 Applicable Tech. Spec. Applicability (Tech. Spec.) Frequency Reference Procedure SP 3665.2 N/A N/AI s This form is being used for the following:

o Tech Spec Surveillance C) System Alignment O Other:

o Maintenance Restoration Non-Tech S(pc

,, v iln e( M L (Retest)

Stpecific' Information" Awe Number Late Date i Schedule Start Date Prerequisites Completed (Initials) Precautions Noted (Initials)

Performance Modes 1, 2", 3", and 4*

Test Authorized By Date Partial Surveillance Date / Time Yes No Perlormed By Date I Time Acceptance Criteria Accepted By Satisfied Approved By (Department Head or Designee) Date [ Yes ] No Date CR#:

Shift Manager Notified of Failed Test Surveillance Information OA Number Cal Due Date Test Equipment Type N/A N/A N/A Comments

• With vacuum in condenser SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Page l of 5

Intake Structure Condition Determination Each shift: CIRCLE the applicable box In each 08 08* 20 20*

section, then TOTAL.

Plant Factors

1. Circulating Water Pumps and Screens All bays, circulating pumps, and screens operating properly or are 0 0 available for operation 1 bay out of service (C, D, E, or F) 3 3 3 3 1 bay out of service (A or B) 6 6 6 6 2 bays out of service 9 9 9 9 3 bays out of service 25 25 25 25

2. Screen Wash Pumps Two pumps available 0 0 .0 0 1 pump out of service 8 8 2 pumps out of service 25 25 25 25

3. Trash Racks

< 6 inches dp on all racks 0 0 0 0

> 6 inches dp on one rack 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3

> 6 inches dp on two racks

> 6 inches dp on three racks (D 6 6

> 6 inches dp on four or more racks 12 12 12 12

> 10 inches on two or more racks 20 20 20 20

4. Trash Rakes Two rakes available (0O 0 0 One rake out of service 8 8 8 8 Two rakes out of service 25 25 25 25

5. Traveling Screens

< 6 inches dp, in either automatic or manual Slow 1 no 0 0

>6 inches dp with screens in Slow 1 6 6 6 6 Screens frequently shifting to Fast 1 (once/hour over 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />) 12 12 12 12 Plant Factors Section Total (1. + 2. + 3. + 4. + 5.) 1At

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead I SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 P 2 nff S Paore of 5

Intake Structure Condition Determination I Each shift: CIRCLE the applicable box in each section, then TOTAL.

Environmental Factors 08 08* 20 20*

I

1. Predicted Height of Next Tide (local tide chart) 0 0 0 0 Next high tide is < 3.0 feet Next high tide is > 3.0 feet but < 3.5 feet c* ( 2 2 4 4 4 4 Next high tide is > 3.5 feet

2. Height of Tide in Last 48 Hours (local tide chart) 0 0 0 0 All high tides < 3.5 feet 2 2 Any high tide > 3.5 feet

3. Wind Direction (actual from MET tower or other source as noted below) 2 71 or < 119) 1 From 271 to 119 (_

02 02 2 From 120 to 270

4. Wind Speed (actual from MET tower or other source as noted below) 1 1 1 Sustained speed < 10 mph 2 2 2 2 Sustained speed > 10 mph but < 20 mph 3 3 3 3 Sustained speed >! .>20 mph but < 25 mph 5* (,1j 5 5 Sustained speed 25 mph but < 30 mph 7 7 7 7 Sustained speed _>30 mph or gusts > 45 mph alarms, or EDAN)

5. Historical Wind Speed (PPC (BOP-F11-F1 1), (OFIS, computer priority Sustained wind < 20 mph in last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or Sustained 0 0 0 0 wind > 20 mph for less than any 4-hour period in last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Sustained wind > 20 mph for any 4-hour period in last 24 (* 2 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />

6. Wind Correction: (3.) x (4.+ 5.) 0 1

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead I SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Page 3 of 5

Intake Structure Condition Determination Each shift: CIRCLE the applicable box in 7.

each section, then TOTAL.

Predicted Wave Height/Seas (from internet) 08 08* 20 20*

I Wave height < 1 foot 1 1 1 1 Wave height > 1 foot but < 3 feet 2 2 2 2 Wave height > 3 feet but < 5 feet , 4 4 Wave height > 5 feet 6 6 6 6

8. Historical Wave Height/Seas (as seen at Intake Structure)

Wave height < 3.5 feet in last 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> 1 1,1 1 Wave height > 3.5 feet in last 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> 1 1 2 2

9. Wave Correction Subtotal: (7.) x (8.) 1 <'

10. Barometric Pressure ( internet or local on site ifavailable) _

Pressure > 29.5" (> 750 mm), steady/rising 1 1 1 1 Pressure > 29.5" (> 750 mm), falling 2 2 2 2 Pressure < 29.5" (< 750 mm), steady/rising 2 2 2 2 Pressure < 29.5" ( 750 mm), falling . 4 4_ 4

11. Season January or July n 0 0 February or December 2 2 2 2 March, June, August, November or May1 6-31 4 4 4 4 April, May 1-15, September or October 6 6 6 6

12. Historical Environmental Factor Last environmental factor < 25 0 0 Last environmental factor > 25 4 4 4 4 Environmental Factors Section Total (1. + 2. + 6. + 9. + 10. + 11. + 12.) -"

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead I

SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Paee 4 of 5

Intake Structure Condition Determination Determination of Factors I Parameter Action Level 08 08* 20 20* I Plant Factors Section Total > 3 points I 1ý I%"

Environmental Factors Section Total > 17 points 2t6o 2ý Intake Condition Total 0 u*O (Plant + Environmental)

Predicted le sustained Sustained weather forcast ( note Ifrom 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> wind speed speed >20 .'

mph SM Review (Note 2) I I

• 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> look ahead 20 MPH make notifications per Note 1 If predicted wind speed is expected to be greater than step 4.1 3215, "Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions,"

Note 2 If any Action Level is exceeded, Refer To OP 3215, "Response to Intake Structure Degraded Conditions," and PERFORM applicable actions.

SP 3665.2-001 Rev. 008 Page 5 of 5

INTAKE STRUCTURE STATUS PLANT FACTORS RED ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS RED

)

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions JPM ID Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0 II. Initiated:

10/31/01 Steve Jac w-*

Developer Date Ill. Reviewed:

/1 /i19 /o1 Date Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Date Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nuclef Training Supervisor /De 1 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions JPM ID Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0 I1. Initiated:

Steve Jackson 10/31/01 Developer Date Ill. Reviewed:

Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date Nuclear Training Supervisor Date 1 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions System: Reactor Core Time Critical Task: ( ) YES ( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes): 20 min Task Number(s): 341-01-175, Perform a reactivity balance to determine estimated critical Csondition.

Applicable To: SRO X RO PEO K/A Number: Sys: 001.A4.10, Determination of an ECP K/A Rating: 3.5/3.9 Method of Testin g: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: In-Plant::

Task Standards: Perform a reactivity balance to determine estimated critical condition.

Required Materidals: OP 3209A, Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions General Referen ces: MP3 Reactor Engineering Curve and Data Book

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Simulator Requirements: NONE Initial Conditions: You are an on-shift Senior Licensed Operator. Your shift is preparing to perform a reactor startup. Reactor Engineering has presented you with two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations for your review.

Initiating Cues: Using the two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations review the ECC in accordance with OP 3209A, Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Condition, Section 4.20. Inform the examiner of the results of your comparison and when you are complete.

'"NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 7

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0

_-,- Task

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions Start Time:

Note to Examiner: approximate values are acceptable, since visual interpolation between curves on a graph may be employed STEP 1 Performance Step: Reviews procedure sections.

Determines if second, independent ECC has been performed (step 4.20.1)

GRADE Standards: Locate and review procedure section.

Obtains both ECC reactivity calculations.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 X Performance Step: COMPARE the two independent ECC calculations and RESOLVE the differences (step 4.20.2)

GRADE X Standards: Compares the two ECCs and discovers the following differences:

"* differences in ECC 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> Administrative Time Period

"* differences in boron worth Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 X Performance Step: Resolve differences in Estimated Conditions at Criticality between the two ECCs. (steps 4.4.2, 4.4.3)

GRADE X Standards: ECC B is incorrect. Administrative time period must start when T/S time period starts.

Resolve by confirming ECC A Estimated Conditions at Criticality are correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 4 of 7

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Review Reactivity Calculations - Estimated Critical Conditions STEP 4 X Performance Step: Resolve differences in boron worth between the two ECCs. (steps 4.12.1, 4.12.2)

GRADE X Standards: ECC B is incorrect. Incorrect boron worth chosen from curve RE-F-02.

Resolve by confirming ECC A Boron Defect parameters are correct.

Comment: There are no other errors in the ECC.

It is not required for the candidate to recalculate values that are in close agreement.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 5 x Performance Step: Determine or Prepare the final OPS form 3209A-1. (step 4.20.3)

GRADE x Standards: ECC A is correct and should be used as the final OPS form 3209A-1.

Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

5 of 7

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: SRO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): 20 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

6 of 7

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: SRO-A1.2 Initial Conditions: You are an on-shift Senior Licensed Operator. Your shift is preparing to perform a reactor startup. Reactor Engineering has presented you with two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations for your review.

Initiating Cues: Using the two independently performed Estimated Critical Condition (ECC) reactivity calculations review the ECC in accordance with OP 3209A, Reactivity Calculations Estimated Critical Condition, Section 4.20. Inform the examiner of the results of your comparison and when you are complete.

7 of 7

IForm Approval.

I A JUL 0 1 1999 *1Effective Date JUL 0 6 1999 I 1999 06eciv rApproval Date C/ý,,)- ~JU

"[urnI ColverShedt JGeneric Information Form Title Estimated Critical Conditions Reference Procedure Applicable Tech. Spec.

OP 3209A 4.1.1.1.1.c AR*

This form is being used for the following:

3 Tech Spec Surveillance C) System Alignment 0 Other:

0 Maintenance Restoration (Retest)

Non-Tech Spec Surveillance (PM)

Specific InformationI Schedule Date N/A Applicable Mode Partial D 2 Surveillance Test Authorized By Date Baseline Test Prerequisites Completed (Initials)

Precautions Noted (Initials)

Performed By Date Time Accepted By Date Time Acceptance Criteria Satisfied Approved By (Department Head or Designee) Date Shift Manager Notified of Failed Test Date D Yes D No Surveillance Information Test Equipment Type QA Number Cal Due Date N/A

• This calculation may be performed at any time but must be verified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> prior to achieving reactor criticality.

Send completed Form to Reactor Engineering.

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 1 of 9

k Estimated Critical Conditions, I

Step No. Name Date Time 4.2 Performed By: I Reference Critical Data Step No. Parameter Value Date o 0 Time 06 _5" Power Level 1O0  %

Burnup -74o3-5 MWD/MTU RCS Pressure 2 ; 4 , psia Tavg _578hL LF Tref 5. OF Boron Concentration [lq( ppm Xenon (-) - 7 L.t pcm Samarium (-) , 5 pcm Control Bank C 3. steps Control Bank D -7 steps Estimated Conditions At Criticality Step No. Parameter Value 4.4.1 Date 4.4.2 Administrative Time Period (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) From: UO00 To: /I C0 4.4.3 T/S Time Period (4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />) From: 50 300 To: / 2. o0 4.4.4 Present Burnup 8 00 MWD/MTU 4.4.5 Tavg 557 OF 4.4.6 RCS Pressure 2,15 psia 4.4.7.b. Xenon (-) 0 pcm 4.4.8.b. Samarium (-) 1300 pcm 4.4.9.b. Control Bank C @ 2 15 Steps or Desired Critical Rod Height 4.4.10 Control Bank D @ / -0 Steps Boron Concentration Step No. Parameter Value 4.5 Present Boron Concentration / 60 0 ppm OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 2 of 9

I D

Estimated Critical Conditions Defects POWER DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.6.1 Power Defect @ Reference Power = (-)Ji._(,_ pcm Defect @ Ref Power 4.6.2 [(-) 5 .5.

Defect @ Ref Pwr pcm] x (1 F U.5 ."pcm Power Defect REFERENCE MODERATOR DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.7.2 pcmn/ F(no sign)

Magnitude of MTC @ Tref = Magnitude of MTC @ Tref 4.7.3 Difference Between Tref and Tavg = Tref/Tg A OF (no sign) 4.7.4 ( _F) x (_ pcm/°F) = _ pcm (no sign)

Trcf/Tavg A MTC @ Tref Ref Mod Defect 4.7.5 Sign of Reference Moderator Defect = (+ or-)

Sign 4.7.1 or Value and Sign of Reference Moderator Defect 4.7.6 Ref C) pcm Ref Mod Defect ESTIMATED MODERATOR DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.8.2 pcm/0 F(no sign)

Magnitude of ITC @ 5570F = Magnitude of ITC @ 557 0 F 4.8.3 Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 557°F = _ °F (no sign)

Tavg/ 557'*F A 4.8.4 ( OF) x ( _pcm/*F) = _ pcm (no sign)

Tavg/557*F A ITC @ 557" F Est ModDefect 4.8.5 Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect = _ (+ or-)

Sign 4.8.1 or Value and Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect = ( Mod Depcm 4.8.6 Est Mod Defect OPS Form 3209A- 1 Rev. 6

Estimated Critical Conditions Defects (Continued)

XENON DEFECT Parameter and/or Calculation Value I I pcm] - [(- 77 7. ' pcm] ) 16771q pcm I ( Xenon Defect Reference Xe I

SAMARIUM DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.10 [ 13o 0 1- pcm] - [(-)0.+/-L,.- S pcm] = (-) 33,S pcm Estimated Sm Reference Sm Samarium Defect ROD WORTH DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.11.2.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions = (-) .7 pcm 4.11.3.a. Reference RW 4.11.2.b.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Conditions = (-) E "ie pcm 4.11.3.b. Estimated RW 4.11.1 or [(-)I5"/3 pcm] - [(-L 7 pcm] = (_) 5o2,3 pcm 4.11.4 Estimated RW Reference RW RW Defect BORON DEFECT Step Parameter and/or Calculation Value No.

4.12.1 Differential Boron Worth @ Reference Burnup = (-)63 c/ppm Reference BW 4.12.2 Differential Boron Worth @ Present Burnup = 6 ,80 pcm/ppm I Present BW 4.12.3 "[(-

76.7/. +

pcm/ppm)+(- .0 pcm/ppm)] -- 2= (-)279 pcm/ppm Reference BW Present BW Avg DiffBW 4.12.4 [( o,00 ppm) - ( I I ' ppm)] x [(-) 6.1 pcm/ppm] = (-) 27-73 pcm Present CB (4.5) Reference C3(4.3) Avg Diff BW Boron Defect OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 4 of 9

SEstimated Critical Conditions I

Defects (Continued)

VOID DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.13.2 Value of Void Correction Factor (Void Defect) = (+)...O .. pcm Void Defect TOTAL REACTIVITY DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value Power Defect = (+) 5 Spcm (step 4.6.2)

Ref Mod Defect = ( 00) pcm (step 4.7.6)

Est Mod Defect = ( ) 2 pcm (step 4.8.6)

Xe Defect = (4) 2 6-7? Yf pcm (step 4.9) 4.14.1 c

and Sm Defect = (-)_331. pcm ( ota plDefe pcm 4.14.2 (step 4.10) Total p Defect RW Defect = (- 5-4.3 pcm (step 4.11.4)

Boron Defect = (- 73 pcm (step 4.12.4)

Void Defect = (+) Q pcm (step 4.13.2) +

Combined Total = (-) . I pcm =

Burnup Correction Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.15.2.a. Critical Boron Concentration @ Reference Burnup = Re C71 ppmG Ref Critical CB 4.15.2.b. Critical Boron Concentration @ Present Burnup = PrsetCrtia ppm Present Critical CB 4.15.1 1771 ppm)-( 17L'2- ppm) = (-I)_2_ ppm or Ref77/

Ciia - Preset 17 LkC 4.15.3 Ref Critical CB -Present Critical CB Burnup Correction OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 5 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions it Critical Boron Concentration Calculation Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value

[(-H) 101_1.1 pcm]--[(-) (y,80 pcm/ppm] = () -)50 ppm 4.16.2 Total p Defect Present BW Boron Equivalent 4.14.2 4.12.2 of p Defect

[( ;L 9 ppm] + [(-) 1SO ppm] = (-) I ppm 4.16.3 Burnup Correction Boron Equivalent of p Defect Corrected Boron 4.15.3 4.16.2 Equivalent 4.16.4 (-) 12-1 ppm] x (-1)= (4) 1.-- I ppm Corrected Boron Equivalent Required Boron A

( l 0oo ppm)+[(4) I 2.1 ppm] = -72) ppm 4.16.5 Present CB Required Boron A Calculated CB 4.5 4.16.4

_ pcm_ 0 F(no sign) 4.16.7.a. Magnitude of ITC @ 557°F = Magnitude of ITC@ 557"F 7F (no sign) 4.16.7.b. Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 5570F =

I Tavg/ 557'F A

( OF) X ( pcm/°F) = _ pcm (no sign) 4.16.7.c. Tavg/557°F A ITC @ 557"F Magnitude of 4.16.7.b. 4.16.7.a. Mod CF Moderator Correction Factor (+ or-)

4.16.7.d.

4.16.7.e.S Sign of Sign of Moderator Correction Factor = Sign 4.16.7.e. Value and Sign of Moderator Correction Factor = ( )______pcm Moderator CF Differential Boron Worth @ for Present Burnup = cm/ppm 4.16.7.f. 4.12.2 Diff BW R( )_ pcm] - [(-)_ pcm/ppm] = ( ) ppm 4.16.7.g. Mod CF Diff BW Boron Equivalent 4.16.7.e. 4.16.7.f. of Moderator CF 4.16.6.a. Calculated 4.16.5 Boron Concentration = Critical Boron Concentration =

( pcm) + ( pcm) = 1____

r a ppm 4.16.1 4.16.5 or Boron Equivalent of Mod CF Calculated CB 4.16.7.h. 4.16.7.g. 4.16.5 OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 6 of 9

mated Critical ConditionsJ I

Critical Rod Height Calculation Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value

[(+)_____ ppm] x [(-) pcmwppm] =

4.17.1 Burnup Correction Present BW pcm 4.15.3 4.12.2 p Equivalent of BC

[(-)_pcm]+[( ) pcm] =

_ ( )__ pcm 4.17.2 p Equivalent of BC Total p Defect Corrected Total 4.17.1 4.14.2 p Defect 4.17.3.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions N cm 4.17.4 RW @ Ref

[( )____ pcm] + [(+) - pcm] _

4.17.5 Corrected p Defect RW @ Reference N pcm 4.17.2 4.17.4 Net p Defect 4.17.6.a. _Bank or Critical Rod Position Corresponding to Net p Defect =@ I Steps 4.17.6.b. Critical Rod Position Rod Withdrawal Limits Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.18.1.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Critical Position (+) 5i 3 pcm 4.18.2 RW @ ECP 4.18.3 [(+) 5 "3 pcm] - (500pcm) =f(-4) or pcm RW @ ECP RW for D @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.4 or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Steps Bank D

@ 2 ) I Steps 4.18.5 Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position D @ 57 Steps Withdrawal Limit 4(pcm]-(750pcm)= (-) 23-7 pcm 4.18.6 RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.5 or Bank 4.18.7 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57

r. Steps @ Steps Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position 4.18.8 C @ 57 Steps Withdrawal Limit OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 7 of 9

I Conditions(

(Estimated Critical Critical Condition4 Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.19.1 [(+) _ _" __ _ (500 pcm) pcm] +RW @ =ECPRW fo D 1@3

(+ for @ 57 pcm Steps RW @ECP Insertion Limit Bank P 4.19.2.a. Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit @ 4j Steps or 4.19.3 Rod Position for D @ 57 Steps Limit Bank C 4.19.4 Zero Power Rod Insertion Limit (RIL) = @ 5"1 Steps 0% RIL 4.19.5 Bank 49 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the @ q3 Steps or 4.19.6 D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL D @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit

(+) oC2 63 pcm 4.19.7 [(+)S ' 3 pcm] + (750 pcm) =

RW for C @ 57 Steps RW @ ECP Insertion Limit 4.19.8.a. Bank 1?*

or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit Ba@ - Steps or @..J~. tp 4.19.9 - Rod Position for C @ 57 Steps iUmit 4.19.6.a.

or Bank__f2_

4.19.10 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the

@ 1 ;L Steps C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL or C @ 57 Steps 4.19.11 Insertion Limit OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 8 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions" lAeview Step No. Name Date Time 4.20.4 Independent Calculation By:

4.20.6 Licensed Operator Review By:

T/S Acceptance Criteria Step No. Acceptance Criteria Yes No OP 3202 Predicted Critical Rod Position Greater Than the RIL Step 4.8.1 OP SteP 3202 4.2 Criticality Predicted Within the T/S 4 Hour Time Period Step 4.8.2 (4.4.3)

OP SP 3202 3202. Plant is in MODE 2 @ the RIL AND Reactor NOT Step 4.19.7.b Critical OP 3202 Step 4.22 Criticality Achieved Within the T/S 4 Hour Time Period (4.4.3)

Actual Critical Data Parameter Source Value Date X Time Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI35B amps Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI36B amps NR Pressure 3RCS-PI455A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI456A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI457 psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI458 psia Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI412 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI422 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI432 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI442 OF Boron Concentration Chemistry ppm Control Bank C Rod Step Counters steps Control Bank D Rod Step Counters steps OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 9 of 9

Form Approval  ! (

j.pproval Date Effective Date JUL 0 11999 JUL 0 6 1999 I Form Cover Sheet Generic Information7 Form Title Rev. No.

Estimated Critical Conditions 6 Reference Procedure Applicable Tech. Spec. Frequency OP 3209A 4.1.1.1.1.c AR*

This form is being used for the following:

STech Spec Surveillance 0 System Alignment 0)Other:

0 Maintenance Restoration Non-Tech Spec (Retest) Surveillance (PM)

Specific InfBymDteonim Schedule Date Applicable Mode Partial fed Sl Ncen2 n Surveillance fTest Authorized By Date Baseline r TestD D Prerequisites Completed (Initials) Precautions Noted (Initials)

Performed By' Date Time

- Acepte By ateTime Accepac Criteria Acceptd BySDteisfied Approved By (Department Head or Designee) Date Shift Manager Notified of Failed Test Date 11Ys F1N Surveillance Information Test Equipment Type CA Number Cal Due Date N/A

• This calculation may be performed at any time but must be verified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> prior to achieving reactor criticality.

Send completed Form to Reactor Engineering.

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 1 of 9

(

Estimated Critical Conditions, Step No. Name Date Time 4.2 Performed By: I 106001 Reference Critical Data Step No. Parameter Value Date /0 [, I 0 1 Time Q6 5.

Power Level 00  %

Burnup - 6 3, S MWD/MTU RCS Pressure Z2--* . 6 psia 6, 6 0OF F

Tavg 6 Tref 5 136. 9 OF Boron Concentration 11 9 1 ppm Xenon (-) 2679. + pcm Samarium (-) 6 1, S pcm Control Bank C Z2 -. steps Control Bank D ea 1 - steps Estimated Conditions At Criticality Step No. Parameter Value 4.4.1 Date 4.4.2 Administrative Time Period (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) From " /0 0 To: Z 4.4.3 T/S Time Period (4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />) From: 0 O0 To: ZoCoC 4.4.4 Present Burnup `30 00D MWD/MTU 4.4.5 Tavg OF 4.4.6 RCS Pressure 2-25O psia 4.4.7.b. Xenon (-) O pcm 4.4.8.b. Samarium (-) 1300 pcm 4.4.9.b. Control Bank C @ 2 I5 Steps or Desired Critical Rod Height 4.4.10 Control Bank D @ 00 Steps Boron Concentration Step No. Parameter Value 4.5 Present Boron Concentration /:1 00 ppm OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 2 of 9

I Estimated Critical Conditionst Defects POWER DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.6.1 Power Defect @ Reference Power (-)__q H I pcm Defect @ Ref Power 4.6.2 [(-)_pcm]

Defect @ Ref Pwr x (-1) = (+) (9* 60 pcm Power Defect REFERENCE MODERATOR DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.7.2 Magnitude of MTC @ T"e __._pcm/1 F(no sign)

Magnitude of MTC @ Tref 4.7.3 Difference Between Tref and Tavg =F (no sign) 4.7.4 (F) (Pcm/°F)___ pcm (no sign)

-Trefffavg A MTC @ T,," Ref Mod Defect 4.7.5 Sign of Reference Moderator Defect Sign- (+ or 4.7.1 or Value and Sign of Reference Moderator Defect = ( )_ __ pcm 4.7.6 Ref Mod Defect ESTIMATED MODERATOR DEFECT C"*_ 'L Ntep INO. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 1 4 Value 4.8.2 ._p cml° F(no sign)

Magnitude of ITC @ 5570F = Magnitude of ITC @ 557°F 0

1 4.ITC@ 557 F 4.8.3 Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 557°F = __ OF (no sign)

Tag/ 557-°F A Tavg/557 0 FA 4.8.4 I

( °OF) x ( _pcm/!F) = 4.

Tavg/557°F A

_ pcm (no sign)

ITC@ 557"F Est ModDefect Est ModDefect 4.8.5 Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect I = (+ or -)

I Sign Sign 4.8.1 or Value and Sign of Estimated Moderator Defect = ) Mod

( Est C Defect pcm 4.8.6 Est Mod Defect I. _______________________________________

OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditionsk Defects (Continued)

XENON DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.9 pcm] - [(-)_pcm] (-)267*4 pcm Estimated Xe Reference Xe Xenon Defect SAMARIUM DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.10 [(-)-- _pcm] - [(-) - ppcm] = (-)3 7, 5 pcm Estimated Sm Reference Sm Samarium Defect ROD WORTH DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.11.2.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions = (-)R ifc pcm 4.11.3.a. Reference RW 4.11.2.b.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Conditions = () 5* 0 pcm 4.11.3.b. Estimated RW 4.11.1 or [(-) ppc[m = ( ) 500 pcm 4.11.4 Estimated RW Reference RW RW Defect BORON DEFECT Step Parameter and/or Calculation Value No.

4.12.1 Differential Boron Worth @ Reference Burnup (-) 6. Z pcm/ppm Reference BW 4.12.2 Differential Boron Worth @ Present Burnup = Pn Z B cm/ppm Present BW 4.12.3 pcm/ppm) + (-_pcm/ppm)] -- 2 = (-)L. IJ pc m/ppm Reference BW Present BW Avg Diff BW 4.12.4 [( ppm) - ( ppm)] X [(-) pcm/ppm] = (-) a -"t'*' pcm Present CB (4.5) Reference CB (4.3) Avg Diff BW Boron Defect OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 4 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions*

Defects (Continued)

VOID DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.13.2 Value of Void Correction Factor (Void Defect) = (+) pcm Void Defect TOTAL REACTIVITY DEFECT Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value Power Defect = (+) I 960 pcm (step 4.6.2)

Ref Mod Defect = () 0 pcm (step 4.7.6)

Est Mod Defect = ( ) 0 pcm (step 4.8.6)

Xe Defect = (+)_ 2 'Jpcm (step 4.9) 4.14.1 (. 5 '1 pcm and Sm Defect = (-). 3 36,Q Spcm ( o-) p Defect 4.14.2 (step 4.10) Total P Defect RWDefect = H 0 pcm (step 4.11.4)

Boron Defect = H z 5 il pcm (step 4.12.4)

Void Defect = (H) G pcm (step 4.13.2) +

Combined Total = (0.) I 52 21pcm =

Burnup Correction Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.15.2.a. Critical Boron Concentration @ Reference Burnup = 0 ppm Ref Critical CB 4.15.2.b. Critical Boron Concentration @ Present Burnup = 'tOto ppm Present Critical CB 4.15.1 or ( _ ppm) - ( ppm) = (-) SO ppm 4.15.3 Ref Critical CB . Present Critical CB Burnup Correction OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page5 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions Cn Critical Boron Concentration Calculation Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value

[(I) Z 52.- pcm] [(-) 6.2 5 pcm/ppmJ = (-)__00 ppm 4.16.2 Total p Defect Present BW Boron Equivalent 4.14.2 4.12.2 of p Defect

[(). 20 ppm] + [(-- 0(,0 ppm] = (-) 1 04

( ppm 4.16.3 Burnup Correction Boron Equivalent of p Defect Corrected Boron 4.15.3 4.16.2 Equivalent 4.16.4 (-) ppm] X x (-1) = (+)Required Boron Appm Corrected Boron Equivalent

( I 0O(G ppm)+[(4) 1-+0 ppm] = V4 O ppm 4.16.5 Present CB Required Boron Aac e 4.5 4.16.4 Calculated CB

. pcn/ 0 F(no sign) 4.16.7.a. Magnitude of ITC @557°F = Magnitude of ITC@ 557 0 F 4.16.7.b. Difference Between Estimated Tavg and 557 0 F a °F (no sign)

Tavg/ 557"*F A

( __ _OF) x ( pcm/°F) = _ pcm (no sign) 4.16.7.c. Tavg/557°F A ITC @ 557°F Magnitude of 4.16.7.b. 4.16.7.a. Mod CF 4.16.7.d. Sign of Moderator Correction Factor = Si (+ or-)

Sign 4.16.7.e. Value and Sign of Moderator Correction Factor = ( )_pcm Moderator CF 4.16.7.f. Differential Boron Worth @ for Present Burnup = (-)p cm/ppm 4.12.2 Diff BW 4

[R )_pcm] + [(-) pcm/ppm] = ( )__ppm

.16.7.g. Mod CF Diff BW Boron Equivalent 4.16.7.e. 4.16.7.f. of Moderator CF 4.16.6.a. Calculated Boron Concentration = Critical Boron Concentration =

4.16.5 4.16.1 ( __pcm) + ( = ( " 0 ppm or Boron Equivalent of Mod CF Calculated CB Critical CB 4

4.16.7.h. .16.7.g. 4.16.5 OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 6 of 9

Estimated Critical Conditions.

C Critical Rod Height Calculation '

Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value ppm] x [(-)_pcm/ppm] =

4.17.1 Burnup Correction Present BW pcm 4.15.3 4.12.2 p Equivalent of BC

[(-)_pcm] + R( ) pcmJ 4.17.2 p

= ( )_ pcm Equivalent of BC Total p Defect Corrected Total 4.17.1 4.14.2 p Defect 4

.17.3.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Reference Conditions = (+)L _pcm 4.17.4 RW @ Ref

[( )____ pcm] + [(+) - pcm] =

4.17.5 Corrected p Defect RW @ Reference pcm 4.17.2 4.17.4 Net P Defect 4 .17.6.a.

Bank or Critical Rod Position Corresponding to Net p Defect @ Steps 4.17.6.b. Critical Rod Position Rod Withdrawal Limits Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.18.1.a.

or Integral Rod Worth @ Estimated Critical Position 4.18.2

= (+) 5 10 pcm RW @ ECP 4.18.3 [ I pcm]- (500 pcm) =() OD 7 pcm RW @ ECP RW for D @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.4 48 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Steps Bank i0

@ 2 2.0 Steps 4.18.5 Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out Position D @ 57 Steps Withdrawal Limit 4.18.6 [(+) - . pcm] - (750 pcm) = ( -) or@- pcm RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps W/D Limit 4.18.5 or Bank 0 4.18.7 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C 57 Steps or Withdrawal Limit or the Control Bank D Full Out@Position @ Zi- I Steps 4.18.8 C @ 57 Steps Withdrawal Limit OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev.

Paozet 67 of 9 Pare ofI

Condition*

- I Estimated Critical

( SEstimated Critical Conditionj Step No. Parameter and/or Calculation Value 4.19.1 [(+) 510 RW @ ECP pcmj + (500 pcm) = (+) 1010 pcm RW for D @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.2.a 0or

• Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit Bank

@ 0 L-q- Steps 4.19.3 =Rod Position for D @ 57 Steps Limit Bank C 4.19.4 Zero Power Rod Insertion Limit (RIL) = @ __5 1 Steps 0% RIL 4.19.5 Bank 0 or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the @ +4 Steps 4.19.6 D @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL D @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.7 4.19__________.pcm] + (750 pcm) = (+) JZ.O pcm RW @ ECP RW for C @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit 4.19.8.a. Bank 6 or Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit @ 13 Steps 4.19.9 = Rod Position for C @ 57 Steps Limit 4.19.6.a.

or Bank D Bn 4.19.10 Rod Position Corresponding to the RW for the or C @ 57 Step Insertion Limit or the 0% RIL @ 13 Steps 4.19.11 C @ 57 Steps Insertion Limit OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6 Page 8 of 9

Estimated Critical ConditionT Igeview Step No. Name Date Time 4.20.4 Independent Calculation By:

4.20.6 Licensed Operator Review By:

T/S Acceptance Criteria Actual Critical Data Parameter Source Value Date Time Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI35B amps Intermediate Range Current NMI-NI36B amps NR Pressure 3RCS-PI455A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI456A psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI457 psia NR Pressure 3RCS-PI458 psia Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI412 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI422 OF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI432 oF Loop Tavg 3RCS-TI442 OF Boron Concentration Chemistry ppm Control Bank C Rod Step Counters steps Control Bank D Rod Step Counters steps OPS Form 3209A-1 Rev. 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

JPM ID Number: SRO-A2 Revision: 0 II. Initiated:

Steve Ja¢ 10/31/01 Date Ill. Reviewed:

,,/1/0 j Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date Da uK r Training Supervisor 1 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Millstone Unit 3 Facility:

JPM ID Number: SRO-A2 Revision: - 0 Task

Title:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

System:

Tagging and Clearance Time Critical Task: ( ) YES ( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes): 10 min Task Number(s): 341-01-079, Develop and/or modify, review, authorize, install, verify, and clear a tag clearance in accordance with plant and/or site procedural and safety requirements Applicable To: SRO X RO PEO K/A Number: GEN.2.2.13, Knowledge of Tagging and K/A Rating: 3.6/3.8 Clearance Procedures

--- Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: In-Plant::

Task Standards: Review and approve a tag clearance boundary Required Materials: Completed work package boundary sheet P&IDs EE One-Line Electrical Drawings OP 3300 series procedures General

References:

WC 2, Tagging OP 3250, Removing Equipment from Service for Maintenance

'*READ TO THE STUDENT'*

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: SRO-A2 Revision: 0 Simulator Reauirements: NONE Initial Conditions: You are a licensed SRO. A tagout clearance boundary for the shaft mechanical seal replacement for the "B" Reactor Plant Component Cooling Water (CCP) pump has been developed.

Initiating Cues: Your task is to review the recommended tagout clearance boundary using available references so that the work package boundary sheet is ready for approval.

"****NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

Start Time:

STEP 1 Performance Step: Reviews the Work Package Boundary Sheet and selects appropriate reference materials GRADE Standards: Selects:

P&ID EM-121A, (CCP), EE Drawing.

1M, OP 3330A, Rev. 15-02 Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 Performance Step: Reviews 3CCP-P1 B-CS, "B" RPCCW Pump Control Switch GRADE Standards: Uses selected references and determines the Pump Control Switch tagging is correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 x Performance Step: Reviews power supply 34D9-2, 3CCP*P1 B breaker racked down and red tagged.

GRADE x Standards: Uses selected references and determines power supply 34D9-2 is INCORRECT.

34D8-2 is the correct breaker (EE Drawing. 1M,).

Tag and tagged position are correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 4 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

STEP 4 x Performance Step: Reviews 3CCP*V91, RPCCW Pump P1 B Suction Isolation, red tagged closed.

GRADE X Standards: Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP*V91 selection, position and tagging is correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 5 x Performance Step: Reviews 3CCP*V8, RPCCW Pump P1 B Discharge Isolation, red tagged closed.

GRADE x Standards: Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP*V8 selection is INCORRECT.

3CCP*V6 is the correct boundary (P&ID EM-121A)

CLOSED position and RED tagging is correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 6 X Performance Step: Reviews 3CCP*V649, RPCCW Pump P1 B Vent valve, red tagged open.

GRADE x Standards: Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP V649 selection, position and tagging is correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 5 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Given a completed clearance boundary and reference material, review, amend and approve the clearance boundary.

STEP 7 x Performance Step: Reviews 3CCP*V314, RPCCW Pump P1B Drain Valve, red tagged open.

GRADE x Standards: Uses selected references and determines that 3CCP*V314 selection, position and tagging is correct.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 8 Performance Step: Amend and approve the clearance boundary GRADE Standards: Makes indicated changes to the clearance boundary, and recommends approval as amended.

Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

6 of 8

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: SRO-A2 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): 10 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Imorovement:

7 of 8

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: SRO-A2 Initial Conditions: You are a licensed SRO. A tagout clearance boundary for the shaft mechanical seal replacement for the "B" Reactor Plant Component Cooling Water (CCP) pump has been developed.

Initiating Cues: Your task is to review the recommended tagout clearance boundary using available references so that the work package boundary sheet is ready for approval.

8 of 8

WORK PACKAGE BOUNDARY SHEET Clearance Number:

AWO Number: Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety: Date:

M30110525 Contact Person / Designee Sign Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Equipment Notes Tag Tag Worker Number Type Position Serial Description Location Placed Verified Verified Number 1 YEL 3CCP-P1 B-CS B RPCCW PUMP POWER IS RED CONTROL SWITCH TAGGED OFF 2 RED RACKED 34D9-2 3CCP*P1B DOWN 3 RED CLOSED 3CCP*V91 RPCCW PUMP P1 B SUCTION ISOLATION 4 RED CLOSED 3CCP*V8 RPCCW PUMP P1B DISCHARGE ISOLATION 5 RED OPEN 3CCP*V649 RPCCW PUMP P1 B VENT VALVE 6 RED OPEN 3CCP*V314 RPCCW PUMP P1B DRAIN VALVE

! (

KEY---WORK PACKAGE BOUNDARY SHEET---KEY Clearance Number:

AWO Number: Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety: Date:

M30110525 Contact Person ! Designee Sign Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Equipment Notes Tag Tag Worker Number Type Position Serial Description Location Placed Verified Verified Number 1 YEL 3CCP-PI B-CS B RPCCW PUMP POWER IS RED CONTROL SWITCH TAGGED OFF 2 RED RACKED 34D8-2 3CCP*P1B DOWN 3 RED CLOSED 3CCP*V91 RPCCW PUMP P1B SUCTION ISOLATION 4 RED CLOSED 3CCP*V6 RPCCW PUMP P1B DISCHARGE ISOLATION 5 RED OPEN 3CCP*V649 RPCCW PUMP P1 B VENT VALVE 6 RED OPEN 3CCP*V314 RPCCW PUMP P1B DRAIN VALVE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit JPM ID Number: SRO-A3 Revision: 0 II. Initiated:

Steve Jackso(= -z-n 11/01/01 Developer Date Reviewed:

Ray Martin C o* t .,. 11/15/01 Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date Nu'cfrTraining Supervisor Dat 1 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: SRO-A3 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit System: Radioactive Liquid Waste System Time Critical Task: ) YES (X) NO Validated Time (minutes):

Task Number(s): 068-01-064, Discharge the contents of a Low Level Waste Drain Tank 068-03-001, Adhere to the requirements of the Radwaste Management Program Applicable To: SRO X RO PEO K/A Number: GEN- 2.3.6 K/A Rating: 2.1/3.1 Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: X Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: In-Plant:: X Simulator: X Task Standards: Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Required Materials: OP 3335D, Radioactive Liquid Waste System Liquid Discharge Permit Screen Print of Rad Monitor LWS70-1 General

References:

None

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 7

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: SRO-A3 Revision: 0 Simulator Reauirements: None Initial Conditions: The unit is at 100% power with all systems in normal line-ups.

The "A" and "B" Service Water pumps and all Circulating Water pumps are running.

Initiating Cues: The Radwaste PEO has presented OP 3335D sign off copy and a Liquid Discharge Permit for discharging the "A" Waste Test Tank to the Circulating Water discharge tunnel for your approval.

Review and approve the permit and report to the examiner when complete.

"*NOTESTO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 7

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A3 Revision: 0 1

Task

Title:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Start Time:

STEP 1 X Performance Step: Go to the correct procedure step, OP3335D, Section 4.25.4.j GRADE X Standards: Locates the correct procedure step.

Candidate may review previous steps.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 X Performance Step: PERFORM Independent Verification of liquid effluent monitor alarm and alert settings. [step 4.25.4.j.1)]

GRADE X Standards: Locates liquid effluent monitor alarm and alert settings on Liquid Discharge Permit.

GRADE X Standards: Locates liquid effluent monitor alarm and alert current settings on RMS Console.

Comments: Since this JPM is done in a classroom setting the RMS Console is not available. When candidate requests information and specifies that he would access the RMS screen for LWS70-1, Liquid Waste discharge process radiation monitor, exercise the cue.

GRADE X Standards: Compares permit settings and RMS information and identifies that RMS is incorrect. Recommends changing RMS to match the permit.

4 of 7

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A3 Revision: 0 1

Task

Title:

Review and Approve a Radioactive Liquid Waste Discharge Permit Initials permit after receiving the cue.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 x Performance Step: Refer to CHEM Form 3800P-001 and CHECK "EST Activity this Discharge (Ci) on Liquid Discharge Permit is less than action level specified. [step 4.25.4.j.2)]

GRADE x Standards: COMPARE CHEM Form 3800P-001 and CHECK "EST Activity this Discharge (Ci) to Discharge permit "Estimated activity this discharge (Ci)".

Determines that values are below the limits. Initials permit.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 4 x Performance Step: CHECK required dilution flowrate is met. [step 4.25.4.j.4)]

GRADE x Standards: COMPARES permit requirement of 2 SWP and 3 CWP to actual plant condition of 2 SWP and 6 CWP.

Determines that dilution flow is met.

Initials permit.

Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation of this JPM is Complete Stop Time:

5 of 7

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: SRO-A3 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): 10 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

6 of 7

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: SRO-A3 Initial Conditions: The unit is at 100% power with all systems in normal line ups. The "A" and "B" Service Water pumps and all Circulating Water pumps are running.

Initiating Cues: The Radwaste PEO has presented OP 3335D sign off copy and a Liquid Discharge Permit for discharging the "A" Waste Test Tank to the Circulating Water discharge tunnel for your approval. Review and approve the permit and report to the examiner when complete.

7 of 7

FORM APPROVED.: C. J. Schwar2 DATE.: 5/16/97 PORC MTG NO.: 3-97-105 MILLSTONE UNIT #3 LIQUID DISCHARGE PERMIT NO. 4463 (2001-69338) ank ............. WTT-A Date/time sampled...: 9-NOV-2001 17:35 Sampled by ..... Date/time on recirc.: 9-NOV-2001 14:00 TSS (ppm) .: (tank limit = 45 ppm) pH.: 4.7 Boric acid conc (ppm) .: 4330.0

<<< 2 circulators must be in operation during a discharge >>>

Independent samples taken >>> yes no (circle one)

Isotope Activity MPC Activity/MPC (uCi/ml) (uCi/ml)

CO-58 3 .522E-07 1. OOOE-04 3.522E-03 CO-60 4. 720E-07 5. 000E-05 9.441E-03 SB-125 4. 779E-06 1.000E-04 4.779E-02 XE-133 4 240E-07 XE-135 1. 920E-07 CS-137 1. 268E-07 2. 000E-05 6 .342E-03 H-3 1. 720E-01 3. 000E-03 5.733E+01 Totals 6. 346E-06 (@) 5. 740E+01 Dissolved gas conc (uCi/ml) = 6.161E-07 (limit = 4.0E-l)

Minimum recirc time using 1 pump is Tech 175. (min)

Sample saved for composite ....................

Date Tech Release limit (Ci) ............................... 6.700E-03

)tal activity released to date (Ci) ........... 1.613E-03

-stimated volume this discharge (gal) ......... 21000.

Estimated activity this discharge (Ci) ......... 5.044E-04 (@)

Estimated total activity released (Ci) ......... 2.117E-03 (@)

(W) these values do not include activity due to tritium (1) Reduction factor .............................  : 1.742E-02 SM/US init (2) Required dilution flow rate .............. 480000. (gpm) 3 circ water, 2 service water pump(s)

(3) Normal rate limit (flow rate=#l*#2*0.1)..:

(4) Liquid effluent monitor alert 150. (gpm) setting .... 1.500E-04 (uCi/ml)

(5) Liquid effluent monitor alarm setting ....

2. OOOE-04 (uCi/ml)

(6) Rad monitor source check completed at ....

Oper Maximum approved rate ........................  :

(Authorization required to exceed normal rate limit.) (gpm)

Dual verification of release rate calculation --- >>> yes no (circle one)

-** DISCHARGE ***

DILUTION TANK DATE TIME FLOW RATE LEVEL DISCHARGE OPERATOR (gpm) (gallons) RATE (gpm)

( i ~I ,

a2 ....

(UJ/ ' Aplroval Approval Date tffect(ve Date POC Mtg. No.

Unit 3 Liquid Radwaste Discharge Goals Year: (O©ppV Normal at Power Operations Refueling and Cold Shutdown Outages Annual Action Level Monthly Goal Action Level Monthly Goal Goal

Z a V, 00 gal/month 12.c, ,v9a gal/month gal/month I.2--) t000 gal/month 1 - .30. (ioo gal

_n galm--o n

,.7r*-p3 Ci/month I / ."7 if-A 'j2 r;/mr~ntb' S/7r-o3 Ci/month / -* if -A -Z Ci/month Ci

---

m_-

,q r.-03 Cl/discharge 3. ,6 -03* Ci/discharge Radwaste Coordinator / Date

"-T,, n Lf,-,, Iýs, z2-L-0-*,

Motcl t-3 WTT-(D 1k I ,A'I-oi' 3.*-Q3 (Ji l 0' - Mtode q-4 Lw-Pl' 2,q, - A, //,.

t7T gJJhsI Pe:

Chem Form 3800P -1 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 1

4Z.: 7-0 SWAVIV-0NI 313t;ýHOtý3ý4

3N 1 - A 0

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager JPM ID Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 I1. Initiated:

9/28/01 Date III. Reviewed:

Date Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Date Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Nucr r Training Supervisor /D~te 1 of 12

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager System: Admin, SERO Time Critical Task: (X )YES ( ) NO Validated Time (minutes): 10 Task Number(s): 301-05-578, Assume command of the SERO Applicable To: SRO X RO PEO K/A Number: GEN.2.4.44 K/A Rating: 4.0 Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: X In-Plant:: X Task Standards: Assume command of the SERO Required Materials: MP-26-EPI-FAP01-001, Control Room DSEO, Rev. 000 MP-26-EPI-FAP06, Classification and PARs, Rev. 000 MP-26-EPI-FAP06-005, Control Room PARs, Rev. 000 MP-26-EPI-FAP08, Evacuation and Assembly, Rev. 000 EPUG-08B, Millstone Emergency Preparedness Resource Book General

References:

MP-26-EPI-FAP06-001, EAL Tables, Rev. 000

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 12

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Simulator Requirements: none Initial Conditions: The Initial Conditions are covered in the Event Description.

Initiating Cues: You are the Shift Manager. You have assumed responsibility in the Control Room DSEO (CR-DSEO) role during an Inter-System LOCA event. You are implementing EPI-FAP01-001, Control Room DSEO, and have completed all actions in Section A and are ready to Go To Section E.

You have classified the event as a General Emergency Alpha (GE-A) based on events in progress and the Incident Report Form (IRF) has been reviewed, approved and transmitted. Your task is to complete all actions in Section E, General Emergency Immediate Actions. Discuss with the examiner any actions that cannot be performed or simulated.

The examiner will act as all persons or agencies with whom you must communicate. Inform the examiner when you have completed the task.

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S" for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 12

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager Record Start Time:

STEP 1 Performance Step: Locate Section E of FAP01-001, and review notes.

GRADE Standards: Reviews notes:

"* Consideration of shelter versus evacuation during hazardous events

"* Advisability of not making PA announcements during security events Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 Performance Step: Notify the unaffected unit control rooms of the event "GRADE Standards: Discusses with examiner contacting MP1 and MP2 control rooms. Includes methods of communicating in discussion.

Comments: Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 Performance Step: Request Security to restrict site access GRADE Standards: Discusses with examiner the following items:

• all personnel called on site must process through EOF Comments: Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 4 of 12

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager STEP 4 Performance Step: Make station page.

GRADE Standards: Discusses with examiner the following items:

• how to active the outside speakers

• the need to expedite evacuation after site page

• the PA message

• where to log time of announcement Comments: Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

"* Outside speakers activated at US desk.

"* Expedited evacuation precludes spontaneous evacuation.

• Message should be clear and brief

• Autolog or SERO logsheet FAP1 5 012 acceptable Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 5 Performance Step: Review and approve IRF Comments: For this JPM IRF has already been approved and transmitted.

STEP 6 X Performance Step: Refer to EPI-FAP06-005, Section B:

Control Room PAR Process Flowchart and determine the appropriate PAR GRADE X Standards: Reviews flowchart and diagnoses that 5 mile doses exceed Table 2 values of TEDE> 1 Rem and transitions down to "EVACUATE 5 MILE RADIUS and 10 MILE DOWNWIND, SHELTER REMAINING EPZ." Protective action 5 of 12

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager recommendation Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 7 X Performance Step: If PARs are warranted out to 10 miles:

1. Record the current wind direction in degrees (from):

2. Check the appropriate row on the PAR table GRADE X Standards: Records 2700 Identifies correct zones to evacuate as A and B and F and Groton City &

town in E, and shelter ALL other zones Grade: SAT UNSAT Comments: Evacuate and Shelter recommendations must both be identified STEP 8 X Performance Step: Contact the DEP Dispatcher in Hartford GRADE X Standards: Obtains telephone number from EPUG-08B and attempts to call Grade: SAT UNSAT Cue:Examiner acts as DEP Dispatcher~

STEP 9 X Performance Step: Identify self and read Evacuate and Shelter recommendations GRADE X Standards: Identifies self and state recommended zones to evacuate as A and B and F and Groton City & town in E, and shelter ALL other zones Grade: SAT UNSAT Cue:,* Acknowe*ege

.. receipt of PARs....

6 of 12

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0

--v Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager STEP 10 X Performance Step: Request the dispatcher inform the DEP Duty Officer that a PAR has been issued GRADE x Standards: Requests the dispatcher inform the DEP Duty Officer that a PAR has been issued Grade: SAT UNSAT Cue: Acknowledge receipt f equest STEP 11 X Performance Step: Log date and time of notification GRADE x Standards: Uses either Auto-Log, SERO Log Sheet from EPI-FAP15-012 or other means to log date and time of DEP notification Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 12 Performance Step: If necessary, refer to and review EPI FAP06, Att. 4, PAR Zone Descriptions GRADE Standards: Refers to EPI-FAP06 for PAR Zone Descriptions Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 13 Performance Step: Refer to EPI-FAP08, "Evacuation and Assembly", and conduct evacuation.

GRADE Standards: Refers to EPI-FAP08, Section 2.2 Discusses SSS/MOS interaction

• Inform Waterford PD of evacuation

• Establish traffic control with Waterford PD and CT State Police Comments: Ask candidate how this is 7 of 12

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 14 Performance Step: Perform announcement over Site PA GRADE Standards: Discuss site notification

• Activate outside speakers

• Sound Evacuation alarm for 30 seconds

• Select station public address system

• Make announcement

• log time of the announcement and contingencies:

• Security sweeps using bullhorns

• HP personnel

• O&M radios Comments: Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 15 Performance Step: Discuss SSS/MOS responsibilities to Shift Manager GRADE Standards: "* Security sweeps to cover areas PA does not cover

"* Verify personnel responding to evacuation order

"* Provide accountability to SM with 30 minutes Comments: Ask candidate how this is accomplished if not volunteered during discussion.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 8 of 12

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 "1-' Task

Title:

Emergency Plan Responsibilities as Shift Manager STEP 15 Performance Step: Refer to EPI-FAP1 5-001, "DSEO/ADTS Briefing Sheet" and complete.

GRADE Standards: Obtain sheet Using Unit Status handout, complete to substantially match the DSEO/ADTS Briefing Sheet - Master Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The evaluation for this JPM is complete Record Stop Time:

9 of 12

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: SRO-A4 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO Validated Time (minutes): 15 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

10 of 12

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: SRO-A4 Initial Conditions: The Initial Conditions are covered in the Event Description.

Initiating Cues: You are the Shift Manager. You have assumed responsibility in the Control Room DSEO (CR-DSEO) role during an Inter-System LOCA event. You are implementing EPI-FAP01-001, Control Room DSEO, and have completed all actions in Section A and are ready to Go To Section E You have classified the event as a General Emergency - Alpha (GE-A) based on events in progress and the Incident Report Form (IRF) has been reviewed, approved and transmitted. Your task is to complete all actions in Section E, General Emergency Immediate Actions. Discuss with the examiner any actions that cannot be performed or simulated. The examiner will act as all persons or agencies with whom you must communicate. Inform the examiner when you have completed the task.

11 of 12

STUDENT HANDOUT INITIATING CUE:

The plant was at 100% power. At 0530 the reactor was tripped and Safety Injection was actuated due to an Inter-System LOCA. The following conditions exist.

CRITICAL PARAMETERS TIME INFORMATION SOURCE The following parameters exist: MB indications RCS pressure 1900 psia and rising PZR level 20% and rising CTMT Pressure Normal CETCs Subcooling 40°F CTMT temperature 1 100 F and stable CTMT radiation histogram Increasing levels Rx Tripped/SI Actuated Operating normally Chemistry Tech reports that the Initial Dose Assessment (IDA) calculated offsite dose is 1.1 Rem Chemistry report TEDE.

Met Tower- All levels of the Met Tower indicate the PPC indication wind is from the North West (2700) at 4 mph Classification: NRC: GENERAL EMERGENCY State Posture Code: ALPHA EAL Table Designation: OG1.6, Integrated Offsite Dose > 1 Rem TEDE 12 of 12

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Millstone 3 Date of Examination: January 7-10, 2002 Examination Level (circle one): RO Operating Test Number: A-I Administrative Describe method of evaluation:

Topic/Subject 1. ONE Administrative JPM, OR Description 2. TWO Administrative Questions A.1.1 Execute JPM Complete a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist (OP 3260A, Procedure Conduct of Outages, Section 1.2)

Steps (GEN 2.1.20) (41.10/43.5/45.12)

A.1.2 Use the Plant JPM Use the plant process computer to determine current Quadrant Process Power Tilt Ratio ,analyze results, and recommend actions to Unit Computer Supervisor. (bundled with SIM JPM #130)

(GEN 2.1.19) (45.12)

A.2 Tagging and JPM Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference Clearance material, recommend a clearance boundary.

Procedures (GEN 2.2.13) (41.10/45.13)

A.3 Review RWP JPM Review RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a and Survey contaminated area (RHR Cubicles).

Maps (GEN 2.3.10) (43.4/45.10)

A.4 RO Respon- Question #1: Reporting location during an evacuation alarm?

sibility in E Plan (GEN 2.4.39) Question #2: Where to report in when called in during an emergency event?

(45.11)

NUREG-1021, Revision 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Revision: 0 JPM ID Number: RO-AI .1 II. Initiated:

10/25/01 Date Ill. Reviewed:

,/ //itio I Date Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Date Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional)

Supervisor 1 of 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: RO-AI.1 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST System: Conduct of Outages Time Critical Task: ( ) YES ( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes): 10 min Task Number(s): 341-01-162, Perform a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist Applicable To: SRO RO X PEO K/A Number: GEN.2.1.20, Ability to execute procedure steps K/A Rating: 4.3/4.2 Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: X In-Plant::

Task Standards:

Required Materials: OP 3260A, Conduct of Outages Current Equipment Status Worksheet General

References:

None

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: RO-A1.1 Revision: 0 Simulator Requirements: None Initial Conditions: The unit is shutdown in Mode 5 after a refueling outage.

Initiating Cues: Plant conditions have just changed. An electrical fault has rendered the "A" SIH pump inoperable. The Shift Manager has directed you to complete a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist. Current equipment and unit are listed on the handout.

Report to the examiner, as Shift Manager, any conditions that would require compensatory actions.

"****NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 10

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.1 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Start Time:

STEP 1 Performance Step: Obtain materials, locate correct procedure step GRADE Standards: Candidate obtains handout from examiner, copy of OP 3260A, Conduct of Outages, and form 004 the Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist. Locates section 1.2 of OP 3260A.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 X Performance Step: CIRCLE appropriate Train Designator GRADE X Standards: Candidate circles "A" on Form 004 Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 X Performance Step: CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

• RCS Decay Heat Removal GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

• RHRTrainA

• All conditions to support natural circulation Comment: Natural Circulation: Candidate should refer to section 1.3.3 to make this determination.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 4 of 10

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-Al .1 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST STEP 4 X Performance Step: CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

• SFC Decay Heat Removal GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

• SFCTrainA

• >23' pool level Comment: Fuel Offload Required Equipment should not be checked. Only for Mode 6.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 5 X Performance Step: CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

• Inventory GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

• Train A CHS PP & flow path Comment: Candidate should also check RWST level >250,000 gallons and V43 tagged. However failure to do so will not effect the Safety Status.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 6 X Performance Step: CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

• Power Availability GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

SA EDG

• RSST

• NSST/Main 5 of 10

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-AI.1 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST 0 Station Blackout EDG Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 7 X Performance Step: CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

• Reactivity GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

• RCS Boron > required SDM

• Inventory Flow Paths (1)

• One SDM Train Operable

• Dilution paths tagged Comment: Inventory flow paths: Connected to the RWST and capable of injecting into the RCS. In the current plant status only the "A" CHS pump and line-up meets this criteria.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 8 X Performance Step: CHECK appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

0 Containment GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate checks appropriate boxes.

0 Containment Closure set Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 9 X Performance Step: INITIAL appropriate boxes for conditions supporting "key safety function" for:

0 PZR Surge Line Flooding

'l-.GRADE X Standards: Using handout, candidate initials appropriate boxes.

6 of 10

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.1 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

• Reactor Core refueled

• PZR vent path < 6 sq. in.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 10 X Performance Step: To obtain each Key Safety Function Total, SUM the points allotted for each credited component or condition supporting the Key Safety Function and ENTER in the box GRADE X Standards: Candidate sums the points for each credited component or condition supporting the Key Safety Function

• RCS Decay Heat Removal 2

• SFC Decay Heat Removal 2

• Inventory I

• Power Availability 4

• Reactivity 4

• Containment I Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 11 X Performance Step: Using the Key Safety Function total, CIRCLE the associated color condition.

GRADE X Standards: see examiner's copy)

Candidate circles the associated color condition for each Key Safety Function

"* RCS Decay Heat Removal Yellow

"* SFC Decay Heat Removal Yellow

"* Inventory Orange

"* Power Availability Green

"* Reactivity Yellow

"* Containment Green 7 of 10

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-AI.1 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

COMPLETE A SHUTDOWN SAFETY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST Grade: SAT UNSAT Comment: If the candidate attempts to continue on in the procedure beyond step 1.2.1.j, prompt him to evaluate the checklist and make recommendations to Shift Manager STEP 12 Performance Step: Report to the Unit Supervisor any conditions requiring compensatory actions GRADE Standards: Reports that all Key Safety Functions are yellow or green except INVENTORY which is orange and requires compensatory actions.

Comment: No further recommendations are required beyond that some compensatory actions are required.

Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

8 of 10

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: RO-AI.1 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): 5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for ImDrovement:

9 of 10

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: RO-A1.1 Initial Conditions: The unit is shutdown in Mode 5 after a refueling outage.

Initiating Cues: Plant conditions have just changed. An electrical fault has rendered the "A" SIH pump inoperable. The Shift Manager has directed you to complete a Shutdown Safety Assessment Checklist. Current equipment and unit are listed on the handout. Report to the examiner, as Shift Manager, any conditions that would require compensatory actions.

10 of 10

RO-AI.1 PLANT CONDITION HANDOUT INITIAL CONDITIONS

"* MODE 5

"* RCS 200 psia

"* PZR LEVEL 60% LEVEL COLD CAL

"* "A" TRAIN PROTECTED

"* "B" TRAIN ELECTRICAL OUTAGE; 34D DE-ENERGIZED

"* "A" + "D" STEAM GENERATOR 50% WITH STEAM RELEASE AND FEEDING CAPABILITY

"* "A" TRAIN RHR IN THE COOLDOWN MODE

"* "A" TRAIN SFC RUNNING

"* SFP NORMAL LEVEL

"* "A" CHS IN PTL

"* BOTH OFFSITE SOURCES ARE AVAILABLE

"* SBO DIESEL IS AVAILABLE

"* SDM MONITOR OPERABLE

"* CTMT CLOSURE IS SET

"* RCS BORON CONCENTRATION IS > SHUTDOWN MARGIN

"* DILUTION PATHS TAGGED PER SP3604C.6

"* THE RWST LEVEL IS > 1,000,000 GALLONS

"* 3RHS*V43 IS TAGGED AND LOCKED CLOSED AN ELECTRICAL FAULT HAS RENDERED THE "A" SIH PUMP INOPERABLE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS JPM ID Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 II. Initiated:

Steve J, 10/25/01 Developer Date II1. Reviewed:

Ray Martin Cr rrff . 11/15/01 Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date Nuc, Pr Training Supervisor 'D1 "

1 of 9

ADMIN JPM RO-A1.2 NOTE ON SCHEDULING OF JPM This JPM is planned to be performed "within" SIM JPM-1 30, Control Rod Out of Alignment, since it flows naturally from the planned procedure path and JPM-1 30 establishes all of the conditions for ADMIN JPM RO-A1.2, Determine QPTR.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS System: Admin, Rod Control Time Critical Task: ( ) YES ( X ) NO Validated Time (minutes): 5 min Task Number(s): 341-01-788, Perform a QPTR Applicable To: SRO RO X PEO K/A Number: GEN.2.1.19, Ability to use plant computer to K/A Rating: 3.0/3.0 obtain and evaluate parametric information on system or component status Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: Simulator: X In-Plant::

Task Standards:

Required Materials: Plant Process Computer SP 31012, Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio, Rev. 4 Reactor Engineering Curve and Data Book General

References:

MP3 Tech Specs AOP 3552, Malfunction of the Rod Drive System, Rev. 3

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 9

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: RO-AI.1 Revision: 0 Simulator Requirements: Set-Up for JPM-1 30, Control Rod Out of Alignment; at step 3.b of Attachment A.

On Plant Process Computer substitute values for the following instruments:

NMP-NM43C and NMP-NM43D substitute "0" Initial Conditions: You are realigning a misaligned rod lAW AOP 3552, Malfunction of the Rod Drive System, Attachment A; Misaligned Rod. You are at step 3.b having just determined that reactor power is greater than 50%.

Initiating Cues: Complete AOP 3552, step 3.b through step 3.d and Determine QPTR.

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 9

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS Start Time:

STEP 1 X Performance Step: Candidate uses Plant Process Computer, Tilting Factors, determine QPTR GRADE X Standards: At PPC monitor or Real Time MMI, locates and calls up Tilting Factors Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 X Performance Step: Determine Tilting Factors using Plant Process Computer.

GRADE x Standards: Candidate determines that 3 of the NI channels are valid information and records that information, but should determine that one channel is NOT providing good QPTR information via the Plant Process Computer.

• NI41: -1.03

• NI42: -1.03 SNI 43: FAILED

• NI44: -1.03 Grade: SAT UNSAT Comments: Candidate should record "good" data and proceed to SP 31012 4 of 9

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 "TaskTitle: DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS STEP 3 Performance Step: Go To SP31012, QPTR, Step 4.2:

QPTR by measurement GRADE Standards: Locates copy of SP31012 and correct section Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 4 x Performance Step: RECORD average percent reactor power from NI cabinet meters NMP NM43F on Attachment 1 (step 4.2.1)

GRADE X Standards: Locates NMP-NM43F and records average percent reactor using Attachment 1 Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 5 X Performance Step: RECORD upper and lower detector digital meter reading for NMP-NM43C and NMP-NM43D on Attachment 1.

(step 4.2.3.a.1)

GRADE x Standards: Locates NMP-NM43C and NMP NM43D and upper and lower detector digital meter reading using Attachment 1

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 6 x Performance Step: RECORD data source in "Remarks" section on Attachment 1 (step 4.2.3.b)

GRADE x Standards: Locates Remarks" section on Attachment 1 and records at least that Channel 43 data came from NMP NM43C and NMP-NM43D, upper and lower detector digital meter.

5 of 9

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 "TaskTitle: DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 7 x Performance Step: On Attachment 1, RECORD 100% NI upper and lower currents from Attachment 2. (step 4.2.4.a)

GRADE x Standards: Locates current Attachment 2 in Reactor Engineering Curve Book and records 100% NI upper and lower currents on Attachment 1.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 8 X Performance Step: RECORD data source and date of Attachment 2 entry in "Remarks" section on Attachment 1 (step 4.2.4.b)

GRADE X Standards: Locates Remarks" section on Attachment 1 and records data source and date of Attachment 2 entry.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 9 X Performance Step: CALCULATE the detector ratio for each detector by dividing each detectors reading by that detectors 100% current and RECORD on Attachment 1. (step 4.2.4.c)

GRADE x Standards: Uses step instructions and calculates detector ratio for AT LEAST channel 43.

Grade: SAT UNSAT 6 of 9

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS STEP 10 X Performance Step: CALCULATE the average upper and lower ratio and RECORD on Attachment 1. (step 4.2.4.d)

GRADE X Standards: Uses step instructions and calculates average upper and lower detector ratio.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 11 X Performance Step: CALCULATE power tilt for each detector and RECORD in QPTR section of Attachment 1. (step 4.2.4.e)

GRADE X Standards: Uses formulae in step 4.2.4.e and calculates power tilt for AT LEAST channel 43.

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 12 X Performance Step: RECORD maximum upper and lower QPTR and associated channel on Attachment 1. (step 4.2.4.f)

GRADE X Standards: DETERMINES maximum upper and lower QPTR and associated channel and records on Attachment 1 Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 13 X Performance Step: VERIFY maximum QPTR does not exceed 1.02 (step 4.2.6.a)

GRADE X Standards: Determines QPTR is >1.02 Grade: SAT UNSAT 7 of 9

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

DETERMINE QPTR, ANALYZE RESULTS, AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS STEP 14 X Performance Step: IF QPTR is greater than 1.02 and power is above 50% RTP, NOTIFY Shift Manager that Technical Specification 3/4.2.4, "Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio," action statement applies (step 4.2.6.b)

GRADE X Standards: Determines QPTR is >1.02 and notifies the examiner acting as Shift Manager that Technical Specification 3/4.2.4, "Quadrant Power Tilt Ratio,"

action statement applies.

Grade: SAT UNSAT Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete. Return to AOP 3552, Attachment A, Step 3.e, and continue your actions with the Misaligned Rod.

Stop Time:

8 of 9

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: RO-A1.2 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): -5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U"for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

9 of 9

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: RO-AI.2 Initial Conditions: You are realigning a misaligned rod lAW AOP 3552, Malfunction of the Rod Drive System, Attachment A; Misaligned Rod. You are at step 3.b having just determined that reactor power is greater than 50%.

Initiating Cues: Complete AOP 3552, step 3.b through step 3.d and Determine QPTR.

10 of 9

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET I. JPM

Title:

Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference material, recommend a clearance boundary.

JPM ID Number: RO-A2 Revision: 0 II. Initiated:

Steve Jacksc 10/31/01 Date III. Reviewed:

Ray Martin a* 11/15/01 Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date Nucle Training Supervisor &11'Z16 1 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: RO-A2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference material, recommend a clearance boundary.

System: Tagging and Clearance Time Critical Task: ( ) YES (X) NO Validated Time (minutes): 10 min Task Number(s): 341-01-079, Develop and/or modify, review, authorize, install, verify, and clear a tag clearance in accordance with plant and/or site procedural and safety requirements Applicable To: SRO RO X PEO K/A Number: GEN.2.2.13, Knowledge of Tagging and K/A Rating: 3.6/3.8 Clearance Procedures Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: In-Plant::

Task Standards: Develop and review a tag clearance Required Materials: Team Lead recommendation P&IDs, EM-109A EE One-Line diagrams OP 3337, Radioactive Gaseous Waste System General

References:

WC 2, Tagging OP 3250, Removing Equipment from Service for Maintenance

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 6

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: RO-A2 Revision: 0 Simulator Requirements: NONE Initial Conditions: The pump impeller on the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-PI B, has seized. Repair efforts are planned and the maintenance Team Lead has made work package recommendations for the clearance boundary.

Initiating Cues: Your task is to develop a clearance boundary for this repair activity based on the maintenance Team Lead recommendations..

""NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X"after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U"for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 6

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A2 Revision: 0 Task

Title:

Given a maintenance repair recommendation and reference material, recommend a clearance boundary.

Start Time:

Comments: Electrical and mechanical isolation of the pump can be done in any order STEP 1_ X Performance Step: Identifies correct piping isolation boundary for the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-P1B GRADE X Standards: Uses P&ID EM-1 09A or OP3337-001 and other appropriate references and identifies the correct boundary:

• Pump Discharge (VO10) CLOSED

• Pump Suction (V006) CLOSED

• Casing Drain (V107) OPEN

• Discharge Vent (V972) OPEN Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 X Performance Step: Identifies correct electrical isolation boundary for the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-PIB GRADE X Standards: Uses OP3337-004, electrical line-up, or EE-1AC and other appropriate references and identifies the correct boundary:

• At MCC 32-3H(2M) OFF

• Pump Control Switch OFF Grade: SAT UNSAT Comments: Submits completed tagout to examiner as the Shift Manager. Tagout should substantially match the JPM attachment.

Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

4 of 6

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: RO-A2 Revision: 0 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): 10 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for Improvement:

5 of 6

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: RO-A2 Initial Conditions: The pump impeller on the "B" Degasifier Recirculation Pump, 3GWS-PIB, has seized. Repair efforts are planned and the maintenance Team Lead has made work package recommendations for the clearance boundary.

Initiating Cues: Your task is to develop a clearance boundary for this repair activity based on the maintenance Team Lead recommendations.

6 of 6

Attachment 7 Tagout Request (Sheet 1 of 1)

NOTE: When this request is used, all sections should be filled out in detail.

Brief Job

Description:

Rep/,cce ,m,://4r ort 3 5- P14 work Package Number: /t3 3 0 0 5 Component to be Isolated( 1 ): 3 - - P3 Multiple isolation points or non-component (i.e.: pipe/tube section): Yes Q No [

(If yes, walkdown required by Tagging Authority)

Recommended Tags 1 )

Color Isolation Point PositionM (1) For Blue Tags indicate initial position or if initial position is not required enter N/A.

Amplifying Instructions:

Contact Person (for multiple shifts, Contact Person is required for each shift) phone:

Approved By: D Dat:phone:

Team e-ader / Planner / Engineering WC 2 Level of Use STOP THINK ACT REVIEW Rev. 006-02 Information 68 of 81

( WORK PA CKA GE'L,OUNDARY SHEET (

Clearance Number:

AWO Number: Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety: Date:

IContact Person / Designee SignI Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Equipment Notes Tag Tag Worker Number Type Position Serial Description Location Placed Verified Verified Number

WORK PACKAGE BO( ")ARY SHEET 1Y /2001 120:11

.,heet Of 1 Clearance 3C08 - GWS06-0006 Num ber: 11111111111111111111 1111111111111111111 111 AWO Number: Clearance Adequate for Personnel Safety: Date:

M30110525 Contact Person/Designee Sign Step Tag Tagged Tag Equipment ID Equipment Description Equipment Location Notes Tag Placed: Tag Verified: Worker Number Type Position Serial Verified Number 1 IYEL 2461 3GWS-P1B-CS B DEGASIFIER _AB 04306 POWER IS RED 06/18/2001 06/18/2001 RECIRCULATION PUMP; GWS PANEL TAGGED OFF 07:27 07:27

,NTRL SWITCH 2 RED OFF 2462 32-3H(2M) ]GWS-P1B DEGASIFIER 3_AB 02406 06/18/2001 06/18/2001

ECIRCULATION PUMP -NORTHWEST 07:27 07:27 3 RED CLOSED 6901 3GWS-V010 )EGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB _00406_DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001 1, B) DISCHARGE 16:17 16:51 4 RED CLOSED 6902 3GWS-V006 DEGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB _00406-DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001

'B" SUCTION 16:17 16:51 5 RED OPEN 6903 3GWS-V107 DEGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB _00406-DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001 (B) CASING DRAIN 16:17 16:51 6 RED OPEN 6904 3GWS-V972 DEGASIFIER RECIRC PUMP 3_AB _00406_DEGAS 11/06/2001 11/06/2001 I (B) DISCHARGE VENT 16:17 16:51

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE APPROVAL WORKSHEET 1ý. I. JPM

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

JPM ID Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 I1. Initiated:

11/28/01 Develk Date Ill. Reviewed:

i x/// ./0 /

Technical Reviewer Date IV. Approved:

Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) Date 1,A Z Nuc &r Training Supervisor 1 of 8

ADMIN JPM RO-A3

SUMMARY

OF CHANGES RE: NRC VALIDATION Added, "ALARA considerations for this task" to the initiating cue.

Added, "and ALARA considerations" to step 4, performance step area and standards

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE Facility: Millstone Unit 3 JPM ID Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

System: Rad worker Time Critical Task: ( ) YES (X) NO Validated Time (minutes): 5 min Task Number(s): 119-03-070, Approve entry and/or enter/exit the various radiation areas located within Millstone Station Applicable To: SRO X RO X PEO X K/A Number: GEN.2.3.10, Ability to perform procedures to K/A Rating: 2.9/3.3 reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure Method of Testing: Simulated Performance: Actual Performance: X Location: Classroom: X Simulator: In-Plant:: X Task Standards: Reviews RWP per RPM 5.2.2 to support the ALARA Program Required Materials: RWP for A RHR Cubicle (040) and Rad Survey Figure #30 General

References:

Radiation Work Permits and Radiation Survey Maps RPM 5.2.2, Basic Radiation Worker Responsibilities

• • • READ TO THE STUDENT***

I will explain the initial conditions, which step(s) to simulate or discuss, and provide initiating cues. When you complete the task successfully, the objectives for this JPM will be satisfied.

You may use any approved reference material normally available in the Control Room, including logs. Make all written reports, oral reports, alarm acknowledgements, and log entries as if the evolution was actually being performed.

2 of 8

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE GUIDE (Continued)

JPM Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 Simulator Requirements: NONE Initial Conditions: You have been directed to vent piping in the A RHR pump cubicle. HP has directed you to use the maintenance RWP 0040, Task 2 for this job. (Give candidate RWP 0040 and survey map #30)

Initiating Cues: Review and discuss your preparations for entering this area and what special precautions you would have to observe. Include in your discussion:

"* ALARA considerations for this task

"* Highest contamination level in the cubicle

"* Highest radiation level in the cubicle

"* Special radiological hazards

"* Longest possible stay time assuming highest general area rad level

" Personnel protective equipment required in the cubicle The examiner will act as Health Physics for any related questions.

• • • • NOTES TO EVALUATOR ****

1. Critical steps for this JPM are indicated by an "X" after the step number. For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly.

The students performance is graded by an "S"for satisfactory or a "U" for unsatisfactory on each step.

2. When the student states what his/her simulated action/observation would be, read the appropriate "Cue".

3. If necessary, question the student for details of simulated actions/observations (i.e. "What are you looking at?" or "What are you observing?").

3 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A3 Revision: I Task

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

Start Time:

Ensure candidate has RWP 0040 and survey map #30 STEP 1 Performance Step: Refers to RWP #40 (A RHR Cubicle)

GRADE Standards: Locates Task 2, RHR Cubicle walkdowns and inspections, covered under RWP #40 Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 2 x Performance Step: Locates specific requirements on RWP for at least:

• Protective clothing

• Dosimetry

• Dose Limit Alarms

• Dose Rate Alarms GRADE x Standards: Reviews RWP for specific requirements including:

"* Protective clothing

-for this task fulI-PCs

"* Dosimetry

-TLD & electronic dosimeter

• Dose Limit & Dose Rate Alarms

• -75 mrem & 200 mr/hr Cue: If candidate does not discuss an individual item:

"What are the protective clothing requirements for this area?

"What are the dosimetry requirements for this area?

"What are the Dose Limit & Dose Rate Alarms requirements for this area?

4 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

Cue: If candidate asks HP for area protective clothing requirements for this area respond:

"What would you expect them to be?

And then "Full PCs are required in this area for the task you are performing."

Grade: SAT UNSAT STEP 3 X Performance Step: Reviews the survey map for ESF Building 4'- 6" Elev. proposed to be entered GRADE X Standards: Reviews survey map for specific radiation and contamination hazards in the A RHR Cubicle including:

"* Smear results

-Smear results #18, #19, #20

"* Gamma Surveys

-280 mrem/hr gamma on contact at RHR pump and HX

-40 mrem/hr highest general area gamma

"* Contaminated areas

-No. 18 highest, 15K

"* Hot Spots

-locates on RHR piping (280 mrem/hour)

Grade: SAT UNSAT Cue: If candidate does not discuss an individual item:

"What are the smear results requirements for this area?

"What are the results of the gamma surveys of this area?

"Where are the contaminated areas?"

"Where are the hot spots?

5 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

STEP 4 x Performance Step: Analyze survey map and RWP to determine preparations for entering this area and what special precautions and ALARA considerations they would have to observe.

GRADE x Standards: Analyze survey map and RWP to determine the following:

"* Highest contamination level in the cubicle

-Pt. 19: 15K

"* Highest radiation level in the cubicle

-80mrem/hr on contact (A RHR Pump)

"* Special radiological hazards

-Wet/Boron near pump

-Hot Spot

"* Longest possible stay time assuming highest rad level

-Dose Limit Alarm (Stay Time) is 125 mrem

-Highest general area rad level is 40mrem/hr

= about 3.125 hours0.00145 days <br />0.0347 hours <br />2.066799e-4 weeks <br />4.75625e-5 months <br /> (figuring in approaching Hot Spots may reduce this time).

"* Personnel protective equipment required in the cubicle

-Full PC's

"* ALARA considerations

-Avoidance of Hot Spot*

-Minimize wait/rest time in higher radiation areas

-Prepare for task (pre stage tools)

Grade: SAT UNSAT 6 of 8

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION JPM Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 Task

Title:

Review an RWP and Survey Maps concerning a potential entry into a Contaminated Area (RHR Cubicles)

Comment:: *Definition of Hot Spot: >100 mr AND 5 times highest background/general area Termination Cue: The Evaluation For This JPM is Complete.

Stop Time:

7 of 8

VERIFICATION OF JPM COMPLETION JPM Number: RO-A3 Revision: 1 Date Performed:

Student:

Evaluator:

For the student to achieve a satisfactory grade, ALL critical steps must be completed correctly. If task is Time Critical, it MUST be completed within the specified time to achieve a satisfactory grade.

Time Critical Task? YES NO X Validated Time (minutes): -5 Actual Time to Complete (minutes):

Result of JPM: ("S" for satisfactory, "U" for unsatisfactory)

Result of oral questions (if applicable):

Number of Questions:

Number of Correct Responses:

Score:

Areas for ImDrovement:

8 of 8

STUDENT HANDOUT JPM Number: RO-A3 Initial Conditions: You have been directed to vent piping in the A RHR pump cubicle. HP has directed you to use the maintenance RWP 0040, Task 2 for this job.

Initiating Cues: Review and discuss your preparations for entering this area and what special precautions you would have to observe.

Include in your discussion:

• ALARA considerations for this task

• Highest contamination level in the cubicle

• Highest radiation level in the cubicle

• Special radiological hazards

• Longest possible stay time assuming highest general area rad level

• Personnel protective equipment required in the cubicle The examiner will act as Health Physics for any related questions.

9 of 8

- RADIATION SURVEY FIGURE NO. 30 UNIT 3 ESF Building 4' 6" Elev.

C(OPY SMEAR RESULTS No. dpm/100cm 2

/- /i ',<"/*

NorthI CTMT RECIRC COOLERS

~2 40 RHR PUMP SIH*MV8806

• M ie iz A SIH"V11 RHR PUMP M

e >< *Mezzani Z

z.

25T - neutron(o711) in mrem/hr 100 - gamma(r) at waist level in mrem/hr 100* - gamma(0 contact in mrem/hr

" - contamination survey point 50 mrad - beta(,/) reading in mrad/hr I

RADIATION WORK PERMIT - 40 Plant Ce Year RWP Number Rev. IRWP Start IRWP pe RWP Category IsP Eiraon 3 1 0040 03 i 01-jan-2001 S -POWER 02-jan-2002 RWP DESCRIPTION ESF Building Component & System Modification, Repair TASK

SUMMARY

Job Description 1 3DAS-Pl1 - Replace discharge piping.

2 RHR Cubicle-ESF north pipechase preventive and correc 3 RHR Heat Exchanger bolting inspection; remove, instal 4 RHR valve work; 3RHS*HCV607, 3RHS*FCV619 preventive a ALARA INFORMATION I'-RA Review Hours- Estimated Authorized Internal(DAC]- Estimated Authorized External(mRem)-Estimated Authorized 01900 00000 0000 000 001900 001900 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS General access to RCAs to perform repairs and Entry on this RWP requires the worker to understand modificiation to ESF Building components, including and comply with the following:

walkdowns, inspections, and necessary support Be knowledgeable of radiological conditions of activities, the work area

• • Adhere to the requirements of the RWP

• • Notify HP before entering overhead areas

• • Monitor electronic dosimeter frequently, especially in high noise areas

• • Unless specifically briefed otherwise, if DOSE RATE alarm sounds, move to a lower dose area and notify HP If DOSE alarm sounds, leave the area and notify HP

• , If electronic dosimeter malfunctions, notify HP BEFORE logging out Modesty garments will be worn whenever PCs are worn L

Hea.th Physics Representative Date RWP Term/Rev Date/Time Terminated/Rev by XCOOP

RADIATION WORK PERMIT - (40) JOB STEP - 2 OF 4 I[Pant Code Year IRWP Number IRev. IRWP Start IRWP Type IRWP Category iRWP Expiration 3 1 I 0040 03 01-jan-2001 I S ~ , POWER I02-ian-2002 "fResponsible Individual/Extension Department/Company Job Supervisor/Extension Department/Company THOMAS BtW.NS/4326 AD/DNC THOMAS BURNS/4326 AD/DNC Buidin l'orZone ILocation Plant Equipment IRad. Area Type 3ESF 4'"ESF 416' GEN/ONIDENTIFIED AREA MISCELLANEOUSI WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF JOB (MATERIALS & METHODS) walkdowns, inspections, I

RHR Cubicle-ESF north pipechase preventive and corrective maintenance to components, necessary support activities. I ALARA INFORMATION oALRA Review Hours- Estimated Authorized Internal(DAC)- Estimated Authorized External(mRem)-Estimated Authorized 00900 00000 00000 00000 000900 000900 NA Task !NRC Task ,Alara Zone Location Plant Equipment System Code Component Code 3305 MISC REPLACE SP 3CMAI 3720 3000 MEASUREMENTS RADIATION (MR/HR) CONTAMINATION(DPM/100CM2) AIRBORN'.E (DAC)

SURVEY iRRCubicle Platform Area 140 5 -

-200 50 5KS - 20K<.

<1K <.3 14" Pipe Chase SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS entry to Tech Spec Locked High Radiation Areas

"}'rmitted using this Job Step.

PCs required in contaminated areas.

HP supervision may adjust protective clothing requirements based on any of the followig:

"* TEDE ALARA reviews

"* Heat stress evaluations

"* FME controls Requirements for entry to High Radiation Areas:

• Dose rate meter or alarming dosimeter AND knowledge of area dose rates, OR continuous HP coverage

- Health Physics briefing for High Radiation Areas IDose Limit Alarm(Stay Time)= 0125 mrem Dose Rate Alarm= 0200 mr/hr Elapsed Time Alarm= 0000 min.

REQUIREMENTS Protective clothing: Lab coat Health Physics Coverage "Cotton liners Surgeon's gloves Periodic

• Booties Coveralls Electronic dosimeter TLD Minimum Margin:

- Shoe covers 0175 mrem Rubber gloves Modesty garments alth Physics Representative Date RWP Term/Rev Date/Time Terminated/Rev by

/ /

1. JPM

Title:

Reactor Operator E-Plan Responsibilities JPM ID Number: RO-A.4 Revision: 0 I1. Initiated:

10/05/01 Date I1I. Reviewed:

Date Technical Reviewer IV. Approved:

Date Cognizant Plant Supervisor (optional) ln1i6 Nucld- Training Supervisor D5e

Questions for Admin RO A.4 Topic: RO responsibilities during an E-Plan GEN. 2.4. 39 K/A: 3.3/3.1 Question 1:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You are eating lunch in the building 475 cafeteria when you hear the evacuation alarm sound. The message following the siren states that an ALERT C-1 has been declared and all non essential personnel evacuate the site via the North Access Point. Where do you go?

Question 2:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You receive a call at home from the Manager of Resources. He states that a SERO activation has occurred, site access has been restricted and you are requested to report to provide shift relief coverage. Where do you report and to whom do you report?

ANSWER KEY Questions for Admin RO A.4 Topic: RO responsibilities during an E-Plan GEN. 2.4. 39 K/A: 3.3/3.1 Question 1:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You are eating lunch in the building 475 cafeteria when you hear the evacuation alarm sound. The message following the siren states that an ALERT C-1 has been declared and all non essential personnel evacuate the site via the North Access Point. Where do you go?

Answer: In accordance with EPI-FAP08, Evacuation and Assembly, non on-duty/on-call SERO personnel within the protected are will report to the OSC Assembly Area in the Bldg. 475 Cafeteria.

Question 2:

You are a qualified Control Operator currently working with the Outage Planning Group. You receive a call at home from the Manager of Resources. He states that a SERO activation has occurred, site access has been restricted and you are requested to report to provide shift relief coverage. Where do you report and to whom do you report?

Answer: Since site access has been restricted, the qualified Control Operator should report to the EOF and the Manager of Resources. The Manager of Resources then will contact the requesting party and arrange access to the site for the individual.