RBG-45938, Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2001

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:53, 26 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2001
ML021220256
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2002
From: King R
Entergy Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RBF1-02-0069, RBG-45938
Download: ML021220256 (49)


Text

Entergy Operations, Inc.

River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 R 0. Box 220 SEntergy St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225 336 6225 Fax 225 635 5068 Rick J. King Director Nuclear Safety Assurance April 29, 2002 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2001 River Bend Station License No. NPF-47 Docket No. 50-458 FileNos.: G9.5, G9.25.1.5, G1O.6 RBG-45938 RBF 1-02-0069 Ladies and Gentlemen:

Enclosed is the River Bend Station (RBS) Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. This report is submitted in accordance with the RBS Technical Specifications, Section 5.6.2.

Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed information, please contact Mr. Bill Fountain of my staff at (225) 381-4625.

Sincerely, RJK/WJF enclosure

Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2001 April 29, 2002 RBG-45938 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Resident Inspector PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. David J. Wrona, NRR Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission M/S OWFN / 7D-1 Washington, DC 20555

RIVER BEND STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

5 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 5 1.2 Pathways Monitored 5 1.3 Land Use Census 5 2.0 INTERPRETATION AND TRENDS OF RESULTS 16 2.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results 16 2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results 16 2.3 Water Sample Results 16 2.4 Sediment Sample Results 17 2.5 Milk Sample Results 17 2.6 Fish and Invertebrate Sample Results 18 2.7 Food Product Sample Results 18 2.8 Land Use Census Results 18 2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results 18 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

21 3.1 2001 Program Results Summary 21

-1i-

LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROGRAM 7 TABLE 2.1 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS 19 TABLE 3.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

22

- ii -

LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1-1 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS 13 FIGURE 1-2 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - NEAR FIELD 14 FIGURE 1-3 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - FAR FIELD 15 FIGURE 2-1 TLD EXPOSURES 20 FIGURE 2-2 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY - AIR PARTICULATES 20

- 111 -

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT I 2001 RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

OF MONITORING RESULTS 27

- iv -

Summary The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report presents data obtained through analyses of environmental samples collected for the River Bend Station (RBS) Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001. This report fulfills a requirement specified in RBS Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) 5.6.2 as required by Technical Specification 5.6.2 of Appendix A to RBS License Number NPF-47. During 2001, REMP results remained at background levels, as has been the case in previous years.

All required lower limit of detection (LLD) capabilities were achieved in all sample analyses during 2001. No measurable levels of radiation above baseline levels were detected in the vicinity of River Bend Station. The 2001 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program thus substantiated the adequacy of source control and effluent monitoring at River Bend Station with no observed impact of plant operations on the environment.

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RBS established the REMP prior to the station's becoming operational (1985) to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity normally present in the area. RBS has continued to monitor the environment by sampling air, water, sediment, fish and food products, as well as measuring direct radiation. RBS also samples milk if milk-producing animals used for human consumption are present within five miles (8 km) of the plant.

The REMP includes sampling indicator and control locations within an approximately 20 mile radius of the plant. The REMP utilizes indicator locations near the site to show any increases or buildup of radioactivity that might occur due to station operation, and control locations farther away from the site to indicate the presence of only naturally occurring radioactivity. RBS personnel compare indicator results with control and preoperational results to assess any impact RBS operation might have had on the surrounding environment.

In 2001, environmental samples were collected for radiological analysis. The results of indicator locations were compared with control locations and previous studies. It was concluded that overall, no significant relationship exists between RBS operation and effect on the area around the plant. The review of 2001 data, in many cases, showed radioactivity levels in the environment were undetectable in many locations and near background levels in significant pathways.

Harmful Effects or Irreversible Damage The REMP monitoring did not detect any harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage in 2001. Therefore, no analysis or planned course of action to alleviate problems was necessary.

Reporting Levels RBS's review indicates that no samples equaled or exceeded reporting levels for radioactivity concentration in environmental samples, as outlined in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-2, when averaged over any calendar quarter. Therefore, 2001 results did not trigger any Radiological Monitoring Program Special Reports.

Radioactivity Not Attributable to RBS The RBS REMP detected no radioactivity attributable to other sources during year 2001.

Following the radioactive plume release due to reactor core degradation at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986, RBS REMP detected 1-131 in water, vegetation, and air samples. 1-131 was also detected during 1998 in the wastewater treatment plant effluent.

This was attributed to the medical treatment of a RBS employee.

Comparison to Federal and State Programs RBS personnel compared REMP data to federal and state monitoring programs as results became available. Historically, the programs used for comparison have included the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TLD Direct Radiation Monitoring Network and the Environmental Radiological Laboratory - Department of Environmental Quality Laboratory Services Division (ERL-DEQLSD).

The NRC TLD Network Program was discontinued in 1998. Historically these results have compared to those from the RBS REMP. RBS TLD results continue to remain similar to the historical average and continue to verify that plant operation is not affecting the ambient radiation levels in the environment.

The (ERL-DEQLSD) and the RBS REMP entail similar radiological environmental monitoring program requirements. These programs include collocated air samples and splitting or sharing sample media such as water, fish and food products. Both programs have obtained similar results over previous years.

Sample Deviations Milk The REMP did not include milk sampling within five miles (8 km) of RBS in 2001 due to unavailability of milk-producing animals used for human consumption. RBS's Technical Requirements Manual requires collection of milk samples if available commercially within 8 km (5 miles) of the plant. RBS personnel collected vegetation samples to monitor the ingestion pathway, as specified in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-1, because of milk unavailability.

  • Required Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) Values All LLDs during this reporting period were less than the acceptable limits required by the RBS Technical Requirement Manual (TRM).
  • Air Samples Listed below are air sampler deviations that occurred during 2001 due to mechanical or electrical failures. These deviations did not result in a missed sample and no LLD values were exceeded. As described in footnote (a) to RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-1, deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule due to malfunction of equipment or other legitimate reasons.

Station Sampling Period Problem Comment Description AGC 12/27/00 - 1/9/01 Sampler Failure Loss of sample volume unknown; sampler replaced same day 1/9/01.

ANI 6/26/01 - 7/9/01 Weather Outage Loss of 58% of sample volume.

API & 7/23/01 -8/6/01 Power Outage Loss of 3.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> or 1% of sample AN I volume.

ANI 8/20/01 -9/4/01 Tripped Breaker Loss of 101 hours0.00117 days <br />0.0281 hours <br />1.669974e-4 weeks <br />3.84305e-5 months <br /> or 28% of sample volume.

AN1 9/4/01 -9/17/01 Tripped Breaker Loss of 181 hours0.00209 days <br />0.0503 hours <br />2.992725e-4 weeks <br />6.88705e-5 months <br /> or 58% of sample volume.

API & 9/30/01 Calibration Due Samplers replaced 10/1/01, one day past AQS2 Date calibration due date; as found data indicated that replaced samplers were within calibration tolerances.

  • Missed Samples No missed samples occurred during the 2001 sampling period.
  • Unavailable Results There were no unavailable results during the year 2001.

Program Modifications RBS made no modifications to the REMP during the year 2001.

Attachments contains results of air, TLD, water, sediment, fish, food products and special samples collected in 2001. TLDs were analyzed by Waterford-3 Dosimetry. All remaining samples were analyzed by RBS Environmental Laboratory. Attachment 1 also contains RBS' participation in the interlaboratory comparison program during the year 2001.

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RBS established the REMP to ensure that plant operating controls properly function to minimize any associated radiation endangerment to human health or the environment. The REMP is designed for:

"* Analyzing important pathways for anticipated types and quantities of radionuclides released into the environment.

"* Considering the possibility of a buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environment and identifying physical and biological accumulations that may contribute to human exposures.

"* Considering the potential radiation exposure to plant and animal life in the environment surrounding RBS.

"* Correlating levels of radiation and radioactivity in the environment with radioactive releases from station operation.

1.2 Pathways Monitored The airborne, direct radiation, waterborne and ingestion pathways, as seen in Figure 1-1, are monitored as required by the RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.1. A description of the RBS REMP sample locations utilized to monitor exposure pathways are described in Table 1.1 and shown in Figures 1-2 and 1-3. RB S may occasionally supplement this program with additional sampling in order to provide a comprehensive and well-balanced program.

Section 2.0 of this report provides a discussion of 2001 sampling results with Section 3.0 providing a summary of results for the monitored exposure pathways.

1.3 Land Use Census RBS personnel conduct a land use census biannually, as required by RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2. The next land use census will be performed in 2002.

The purpose of this census is to identify changes in uses of land within five miles of RBS that would require modifications to the REMP or the Technical Requirements Manual. The most important criteria during this census is to determine location in each sector of the nearest:

1) Residence
2) Animal milked for human consumption
3) Garden of greater than 50 m2 (500 ft 2 ) producing broadleaf vegetation
  • The method used by RBS personnel for conducting this land use census is as follows:

"* RBS personnel conduct door-to-door field surveys and/or aerial surveys in each meteorological sector out to five miles in order to locate the nearest resident and milk animal.

"* Consultation with local agricultural authorities is used in instances when personal contact cannot be made.

"* As a result of these surveys, the following information is obtained in each meteorological sector:

1) Nearest permanent residence
2) Nearest milking animal

"* RBS personnel identify locations on the map, measure distances to RBS and record results.

"* Locations, if any, are identified which yield a calculated dose or dose commitments greater than those currently calculated in the Technical Requirements Manual.

"* RBS personnel compare results to previous census.

RBS personnel do not perform a garden census since Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2 allows the routine sampling of broadleaf vegetation in the highest D/Q sector near the site boundary in lieu of the garden census.

Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Airborne Radioiodine and Particulates 2 samples from close to the 2 SITE ANI (0.9 km W) - RBS site Hwy 965; 0.4 Continuous sampler operation Radioiodine Cannisters 131 BOUNDARY locations, in different km south of Activity Center. with sample collection every analysis every two weeks.

sectors, of the highest calculated two weeks, or more frequently annual average groundlevel D/Q. AP1 Station(0.9 km WNW)

Activity Center.- Behind River Bend if required by dust loading. Air Particulate - Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change.

Radioiodine and Particulates I sample from the vicinity of a AQS2 (5.8 km NW) - St. Francis community having the highest Substation on US Hwy. (Bus.) 61 in St.

calculated annual average groundlevel Francisville.

D/Q.

Radioiodine and Particulates 1 sample from a control location, as for AGC (17.0 km SE) - Entergy Service example 15 - 30 km distance and in the Center compound in Zachary. (Control) least prevalent wind direction.

Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

meteorological sector in the general TAe(1.7 km N) - River Bend Training area of the SITE BOUNDARY. Center.

TBI (0.5 km NNE) - Utility pole near River Bend Station cooling tower yard area.

TCM (1.7 km NE) - Stub pole at Jct. US Hwy. 61 and Old Highway 61.

Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

meteorological sector in the general TD1 (1.6 km ENE) - Stub pole along WF7, area of the SITE BOUNDARY. 150m S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.

TEl (1.3 km E) - Stub pole along WF7, 1 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.

TF1 (1.3 km ESE) - Stub pole along WF7, 1.6 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.

TG1 (1.6 km SE) - Stub pole along WF7, 2 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.

TH1 (1.7 km SSE) - Stub pole at power line crossing of WF7 (near Grants Bayou).

TJ1 (1.5 km S) - Stub pole near River Bend Station Gate #23 on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965).

TK1 (0.9 km SSW) - Utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965), 20 m S of River Bend Station River Access Road.

TL1 (1.0 km SW) - First utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965) S of former Illinois Central Gulf RR crossing.

Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each TM1 (0.9 km WSW) - Third utility pole on Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

meteorological sector in the general Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965) N of area of the SITE BOUNDARY. former Illinois Central Gulf RR crossing.

TNI (0.9 km W) - Utility pole along Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965), near garden and ANI air sampler location.

TP1 (0.9 km WNW) - Behind River Bend Station Activity Center at AP1 air sampler location.

TQ1 (0.6 km NW) - Access from MA-1 on RBS North Access Road.

TR1 (0.8 km NNW) - River Bend Station North Access Road across from Main Plant entrance.

TLDs The balance of the stations (8) to be TAC (15.8 km N) - Utility pole at Jct. of US placed in special interest areas such Hwy. 61 and LA Hwy. 421, 7.9 km north of as population centers, nearby Bains. (Control) residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 areas to serve as control locations. TCS (12.3 km NE) - Utility pole at gate to East Louisiana State Hospital in Jackson.

(Special)

TEC (16.0 km E) - Stub pole at jct. of Hwy.

955 and Midway Road, 4.8 km North of Jct. of Hwys 955 and 964. (Control)

Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation The balance of the stations (8) to be TGS (17.0 km SE) - Entergy Service Center Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

placed in special interest areas such compound in Zachary. (Special) as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 TNS (6.0 km W) - Utility pole with electrical areas to serve as control locations. meter at west bank ferry landing (LA Hwy.

10). (Special)

TQSI (4.0 km NW) - Utility pole front of Pentecostal church (opposite West Feliciana Parish Hospital) near Jct. US Hwy. 61 and Ferdinand Street. (Special)

TQS2 (5.8 km NW) - St. Francis Substation on business US Hwy. 61 in St. Francisville.

(Special)

TRS (9.2 km NNW) - Stub pole at Jct. of US Hwy. 61 and WF2 near Bains (West Feliciana High School). (Special)

Waterborne Surface Water 1 sample upstream and 1 sample SWU (5.0 km W) - Mississippi River about 4 Grab samples quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis downstream. km upstream from the plant liquid discharge quarterly, tritium analysis outfall, near LA Hwy. 10 ferry crossing. quarterly.

SWD (7.75 km S) - Mississippi River about 4 km downstream from plant liquid discharge outfall, near paper mill.

- 10-

Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Waterborne Groundwater Samples from 1 or 2 sources only if WU (-470 m NNE) - Upland Terrace Aquifer Semiannually Gamma isotopic and tritium likely to be affected. well upgradient from plant. analysis semiannually.

WD (-470 m SW) - Upland Terrace Aquifer well downgradient from plant.

Sediment From Shoreline 1 sample from downstream area with SEDD (7.75 km S) - Mississippi River about Annually Gamma isotopic analysis existing or potential recreational value. 4 km downstream from plant liquid discharge annually.

outfall, near paper mill.

Ingestion Milk If commercially available, 1 sample Currently, no available milking animals Quarterly when animals are Gamma isotopic and 1-131 from milking animals within 8 km within 8 km of RBS. on pasture. analysis quarterly when animals distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year.

1 sample from milking animals at a control location 15 - 30 km distant when an indicator location exists.

Fish and Invertebrates 1 sample of a commercially and/or FD (7.75 km S) - One sample of a Annually Gamma isotopic analysis on recreationally important species in commercially and/or recreationally important edible portions annually vicinity of plant discharge area. species from downstream area influenced by plant discharge.

1 sample of similar species in area FU (4.0 km WSW) - One sample of a not influenced by plant discharge. commercially and/or recreationally important species from upstream area not influenced by plant discharge.

Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Ingestion Food Products 1 sample of one type of broadleaf GN1 (0.9 km W) - Sampling will be Quarterly during the growing Gamma isotopic and 1-131 vegetation grown near the SITE performed in accordance with Table 3.12.1-1 season. analysis quarterly.

BOUNDARY location of highest Section 4.a of the Technical Requirements predicted annual average groundlevel Manual.

D/Q if milk sampling is not performed.

1 sample of similar broadleaf GQC (32.0 km NW) - One sample of similar vegetation grown 15 - 30 km distant, vegetables from LA State Penitentiary at if milk sampling is not performed. Angola. (Control)

FIGURE 1-1 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS FIGURE 1-2 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES - NEAR FIELD Ný a R B (NW) (NNW) (NNE)

/ C N / (NE) 1.

I /

I 6y$ /

P "I (WNW) 11 N-N N

(w)

/

/

/

N

/

/

/

/ G

/ (SE)

/ \

/

/

\

I!

I / I

/

/

I metefs I I H L  !

(Sw) I (SSE)

/

I Environmental Monitoring Locations

/

I A_ Air Sampler I T_ TLD

/ I WU Sampling Well (Upgradient)

/ 1 K J WD Sampling Well (Downgradient)

I

/ (ssw) I (s) GNI Onsite Garden

- 14-

FIGURE 1-3 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES FAR FIELD t B C (NNE) /

(NE)

/

1 A f "I A

A D

(ENE)

"I .Mtkson A "I

N N

E (E)

N F

A A ZS~aty M r I N (WSW) I N

I ,N Sainte A

x /

I I A

/

/ I I G L I (SEJ (Sw) I, t

I Pol->

K  !

(ssw) 1 salon Ron9 .

/

1 Far- field Radiological I Environmental Monitoring Locations l

A C Air Sampler Control I

AS Air Sampler Special T 1 TLD Indicator TC TLD Control T_S Special TLDs 0 5 10 GQC Vegetation Control SWU Upstream Surface Water kilometers SWD Downstream Surface Water SEDD Downstream Sediment FU Upstream Fish/invertebrates J FD Downstream Fish/Invertebrates (S) 2.0 Interpretation and Trends of Results 2.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results Iodine- 131 was not detected in the radioiodine cartridges during 2001, as has been the case in previous years. Indicator gross beta air particulate results for 2001 were similar to preoperational and operational levels as seen below. Results are reported as annual average pCi/m 3 .

Monitorin2 Period Result Preoperational 0.03 2000 0.02 2001 0.02 Table 3.1 provides a comparison of the indicator and control location mean values, which further emphasizes that the airborne pathway continues to remain at background levels. Figure 2-2 also shows a comparison of indicator versus control and pre operational beta activities.

2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results Gamma radiation dose in the reporting period compares to previous years as shown in Figure 2-1. This figure, which indicates that ambient radiation levels have remained at or near background levels, shows 1996 - 2001 annual average results for indicator locations compared to preoperational levels and the controls.

RBS normalizes measured doses to 90 days and relies on comparison of the indicator locations to the control as a measure of plant impact. RBS's comparison of the inner ring and special interest area TLD results to the controls, as seen in Table 3.1, indicates that the ambient radiation levels are unaffected by plant operations.

Therefore, levels continue to remain at or near background.

2.3 Water Sample Results Analytical results for 2001 surface water and groundwater samples were similar to those reported in previous years.

Surface water samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits at the indicator and control locations. Tritium was also below detectable limits at all locations. Listed below is a comparison of 2001 results from the indicator location as compared to the preoperational and operational years.

Results are reported as annual average pCi/1.

Radionuclide 2001 1996 - 2000 Preoperational Gammas <LLD <LLD <LLD Tritium <LLD 258 <LLD Groundwater samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Gamma radionuclides and Tritium were below detectable limits at the indicator and control locations. Listed below is a comparison of 2001 results from the indicator location as compared to the preoperational and operational years. Results are reported as annual average pCi/1.

Radionuclide 2001 1996 - 2000 Preoperational Gammas <LLD <LLD <LLD Tritium <LLD 290 <LLD Based on these comparisons, the operation of RBS had no impact on this pathway during 2001, and levels of radionuclides monitored for this pathway continue to remain similar to those obtained in operational and preoperational years.

RBS personnel also collected special effluent wastewater samples from the sewage treatment plant during 2001 to supplement the REMP. RBS did not detect any gamma radionuclides in these samples.

2.4 Sediment Sample Results Sediment samples were collected from the indicator location in 2001 and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. In 2001, gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits, which is consistent with the preoperational and operational monitoring periods.

Therefore, based on these measurements, RBS operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this pathway.

RBS personnel also collected special sediment samples from East Creek and West Creek during 2001 to supplement the REMP. RBS did not detect any gamma radionuclides in these samples.

2.5 Milk Sample Results Milk samples were not collected during 2001 due to the unavailability of indicator locations within 5 miles (8 km) of RBS. Since there are no dairies within five miles of the RBS site, it is concluded RBS's operation had no impact on this pathway in 2001.

2.6 Fish and Invertebrate Sample Results Fish samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides. In 2001, gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits, which is consistent with the preoperational and operational monitoring periods.

Therefore, based on these measurements, RBS operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this pathway.

2.7 Food Product Sample Results Food product samples were collected when available from two locations (indicator and control) in 2001 and analyzed for Iodine-131 and gamma radionuclides. The 2001 levels remained undetectable, which is consistent with previous operational years.

Therefore, since levels continue to remain at background, it can be concluded that plant operations is not impacting this pathway.

2.8 Land Use Census Results The land use census was conducted during the 2000 growing season in accordance with RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2. Although there were some minor changes between the 1998 and 2000 census as seen in Table 2.1, the land use census did not identify any location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in requirement TSR 3.11.2.3.1. In addition, no dairy animals were found within 8 km of RBS during the 2000 census.

RBS personnel did not perform a garden census since Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2 allows the routine sampling of broadleaf vegetation in the highest D/Q sector near the site boundary in lieu of the garden census.

2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results RBS' Environmental Laboratory analyzed interlaboratory comparison samples to fulfill the requirements of Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.3. Attachment 1, 2001 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report, contains these results. RBS's review of interlaboratory comparison results indicated that 98% of the sample results for accuracy were within the acceptable control limits of the three normalized deviations.

For those sample results outside the acceptable control limits, RBS's review indicated no impact on previously reported data. Attachment 1 also provides additional discussion regarding sample results outside the acceptable control limits.

Table 2-1 Land Use Census Results Item Sector Direction Nearest Range Nearest Range Residence (kin) Milk Animal (km) 1 A NT InncoQ 1 8 2 B NNE Dreher 1.6 3 C NE Bickham, J. 1.4 4 D ENE Goulette 1.4 5 E E Bickham, S. 2.2 6 F ESE Hilburn 2.9 SE Mills 6.6 7 G 8 H SSE Hubbard 1.7 S Knecht 2 1.8 9 J 10 K SSW Guillory 7.4 11 L SW Fountain 7.9 12 M WSW 13 N W Lacost 6.1 14 P WNW Hermann 3.4 15 Q NW Stokes 1.3 16 R NNW Young 3 1.7 1

New range calculated for resident in sector F; 2.9 km compared to 2.1 km.

2 New resident in sector J, with no change in range.

3 New resident at same location in sector R.

- 19-

FIGURE 2-1 TLD Exposures 20.00 15.00 10.00.

5.00 5.00 -- e- hdi-,ators

- cornrols SPre-Operationad 0.00 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 FIGURE 2-2 Gross Beta Activity on Ar Particulates 0.025 0.020 0.015- 9718lgo00 0.010 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

-20 -

3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 3.1 2001 Program Results Summary Table 3.1 summarizes the 2001 REIP results. RBS personnel did not use values reported as less than the lower limit of detection (<LLD) when determining ranges and means for indicator and control locations.

TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50-458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2001 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Nonroutine

[Range ] [ Range Results e Mean (F) c Location d [ Range I Air Particulates Gross Beta 0.01 0.021 ( 78 / 78) AQS2 0.022 ( 26 / 26) 0.019 ( 26 / 26 0

[0.007 - 0.044 ] (5.8 km NW) [ 0.010 - 0.044 1 [0.008 - 0.039]

(pCi/m 3 ) 104 Airborne Iodine 1-131 104 0.07 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0

( pCi/m3 )

Inner Ring TLDs Gamma 64 (f) 12.60 ( 64 / 64) TB1 14.60 (4 / 4) N/A 0

( mR/Qtr ) [ 8.98 - 16.04] (0.5 km NNE) [ 13.53 - 16.041 Special Interest TLDs Gamma 20 (f) 13.15 (20 / 20) TRS 14.53 (4 / 4) N/A 0 (mR/Qtr) [11.16-15.36] (9.2 kmNNW) [13.53-15.36]

Control TLDs Gamma 12 (f) N/A N/A N/A 14.66 ( 12 / 12) 0 (mR/Qtr) [13.24 - 16.161 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50-458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2001 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) c Mean (F) C Nonroutine

[Range ]Range Results e Mean (F ) c Location d [ Range ]

Surface Water H-3 8 3000 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/I)

Gamma 8 <LLD Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ba-140 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 La-140 15 <LLD N/A N/A 0 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Statior Docket No: 50-458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2001 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) C Mean (F) C Nonroutine Results e

[Range ]_[_Range Mean (F) c Location d [Range ]

Groundwater H-3 4 3000 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/1)

Gamma 4 <LLD Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ba-140 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 La-140 15 <LLD N/A N/A 0 Shoreline Sediment Gamma 1 (pCi/kg) Cs-134 150 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 9 0 Cs-137 180 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50-458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish. Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2001 Sample Type Type & Number LLD b Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Nonroutine

[Range] [Range] Results e Mean ( F) c M Range ]C 2 Location d Gamma Fish (pCi/kg) Mn-54 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 260 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 260 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 150 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Food Products 1-131 8 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/kg)

Gamma 8 Cs-134 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 80 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Special Sediment Gamma 8 (East & West Creek) Cs-134 150 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 (pCi/kg) Cs-137 180 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0

- 25 -

TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: River Bend Station Docket No: 50-458 Location of Facility: West Feliciana Parish. Louisiana Reporting Period: January - December 2001 Type & Number LLD b Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of Sample Type Mean (F) c Mean (F) c Nonroutine (Units) of Analyses a Results e

[Range ]Range]

Mean (F) c Location d [Range I Special Wastewater Gamma 12 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 (Sewage Plant Effluent) Mn-54 30 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 (pCi/1) Fe-59 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Co-60 30 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Zr-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 1-131 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Cs-134 18 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Cs-137 60 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 Ba-140 15 <LLD N/A N/A N/A 0 La-140 a 1-131 = Iodine-131; H-3 = Tritium b LLD - Required lower limit of detection based on RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-3.

indicated in parenthesis (F).

c Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is d Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) direction and distance relative to reactor site.

is considered non-routine e Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result if it exceeds ten times the preoperational value for the location.

f LLD is not defined in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-3.

g Control location for sediment is upstream surface water sample.

Attachment 1 2001 Radiological Monitoring Report Summary of Monitoring Results TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 1.1 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AN1 29 TABLE 1.2 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AP1 30 TABLE 1.3 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AQS2 31 TABLE 1.4 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AGC 32 TABLE 2.1 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS 33 TABLE 3.1 SURFACE WATER 34 TABLE 4.1 GROUNDWATER 35 TABLE 5.1 SHORELINE SEDIMENT 36 TABLE 6.1 FOOD PRODUCTS 36 TABLE 7.1 FISH AND INVERTEBRATES 37 TABLE 8.1 SEDIMENTS (SPECIAL) 38 TABLE 9.1 WASTEWATER PLANT EFFLUENT (SPECIAL) 39 TABLE 10.1 INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON RESULTS 40 Table 1.1 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Indicator Location ANI Analysis: Gross Beta and Iodine Units: pCi/m3 LLD (pCi/mA3) 0.07 0.01 LAB ID START DATE END DATE 1-131 GROSS BETA 20010015 12/27/2000 1/9/2001 < 0.007 0.036 +/-0.002 20010056 119/2001 1/23/2001 < 0.008 0.020 +/-0.001 20010093 1/23/2001 2/5/2001 < 0.012 0.029 +-0.002 20010121 2/5/2001 2/19/2001 < 0.009 0.017 +/-0.001 20010153 2/19/2001 3/6/2001 < 0.009 0.018 +/-0.001 20010191 3/6/2001 3/20/2001 < 0.008 0.020 +/-0.001 20010234 3/20/2001 4/3/2001 < 0.009 0.021 +/-0.001 20010302 4/3/2001 4/17/2001 < 0.007 0.018 +/-0.001 20010357 4/17/2001 5/1/2001 < 0.008 0.025 +/-0.001 20010407 5/1/2001 5/15/2001 < 0.008 0.023 +/-0.001 20010441 5/15/2001 5/29/2001 < 0.009 0.022 +/-0.001 20010477 5/29/2001 6/12/2001 < 0.007 0.012 +/-0.001 20010533 6/12/2001 6/2612001 < 0.009 0.020 +/-0.001 20010573 6/26/2001 7/9/2001 < 0.021 0.018 +/-0.002 20010618 7/9/2001 7/23/2001 < 0.010 0.019 +/-0.001 20010651 7/23/2001 8/6/2001 < 0.007 0.017 +/-0.001 20010679 8/6/2001 8/20/2001 < 0.009 0.015 +/-0.001 20010708 8/20/2001 9/4/2001 < 0.012 0.023 +/-0.002 20010742 9/4/2001 9/17/2001 < 0.024 0.007 +/-0.002 20010803 9/17/2001 10/1/2001 < 0.009 0.027 +/-0.001 20010863 10/1/2001 10/15/2001 < 0.010 0.020 +/-0.001 20010915 10/15/2001 10/29/2001 < 0.009 0.019 +1-0. 001 20010960 10/29/2001 11/13/2001 < 0.007 0.036 +/-0.002 20010991 11/13/2001 11/27/2001 < 0.010 0.018 +/-0.001 20011028 11/27/2001 12/10/2001 < 0.009 0.023 +/-0.001 12/10/2001 12/20/2001 < 0.009 0.023 +/-0.002 20011077 Average: 0.021 Maximum: 0.036 Minimum: 0.007 Table 1.2 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Indicator Location AP1 Analysis: Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/m3 Units:

LLD (pCi/mA3) 0.07 0.01 LAB ID START DATE END DATE 1-131 GROSS BETA 20010014 12/27/2000 1/9/2001 < 0.010 0.035 +/-0.002 20010055 1/9/2001 1/23/2001 < 0.007 0.021 +/-0.001 20010092 1/23/2001 2/5/2001 < 0.010 0.028 +/-0-001 20010120 2/5/2001 2/19/2001 < 0.008 0.018 +/-0.001 20010152 2/19/2001 3/6/2001 < 0.008 0.017 +/-0.001 20010190 3/6/2001 3/20/2001 < 0.008 0.017 +/-0.001 20010233 3/20/2001 4/3/2001 < 0.007 0.017 +/-0.001 20010301 4/3/2001 4/17/2001 < 0.007 0.017 +/-0.001 20010356 4/17/2001 5/11/2001 < 0.006 0.021 +/-0.001 20010406 5/1/2001 5/15/2001 < 0.008 0.021 +/-0.001 20010440 5/15/2001 5/2912001 < 0.008 0.018 +/-0.001 20010476 5/29/2001 6/12/2001 < 0.009 0.009 +/-0.001 20010532 6/12/2001 6/2612001 < 0.008 0.017 +/-0.001 20010572 6126/2001 7/9/2001 < 0.008 0.011 +/-0.001 20010617 7/9/2001 7123/2001 < 0.007 0.015 +/-0.001 20010650 7/23/2001 8/6/2001 < 0.007 0.014 +/-0.001 20010678 8/6/2001 8/20/2001 < 0.009 0.016 +/-0.001 20010707 8/2012001 9/412001 < 0.006 0.017 +/-0.001 20010741 9/4/2001 9/1712001 < 0.007 0.018 +/-0.001 20010802 9/17/2001 10/1/2001 < 0.008 0.027 +/-0.001 20010862 10/1/2001 10/15/2001 < 0.005 0.024 +/-0.001 20010914 10/15/2001 10/29/2001 < 0.007 0.020 +/-0.001 20010959 10/29/2001 11/13/2001 < 0.009 0.044 +/-0.002 20010990 11/13/2001 11/27/2001 < 0.007 0.029 +/-0.001 20011027 11/27/2001 12/10/2001 < 0.008 0.025 +/-0.001 20011076 12/10/2001 12/20/2001 < 0.011 0.025 +/-0.002 Average: 0.021 Maximum: 0.044 Minimum: 0.009 Table 1.3 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Indicator Location AQS2 Analysis: Gross 3Beta and Iodine Units: pCi/m LLD (pCi/mA3) 0.07 0.01 LAB ID START DATE END DATE 1-131 GROSS BETA 20010016 12/27/2000 1/9/2001 0.011 0.039 +/-0.002 20010057 1/9/2001 1/23/2001 0.009 0.023 +/-0.001 20010094 1/23/2001 2/5/2001 0.013 0.030 +/-0.002 20010122 2/5/2001 2/19/2001 0.008 0.021 +/-0.001 20010154 2/19/2001 3/6/2001 0.008 0.019 +/-0.001 20010192 3/6/2001 3/20/2001 0.009 0.021 +/-0.001 20010235 3/20/2001 4/3/2001 0.008 0.021 +/-0.001 20010303 4/3/2001 4/1712001 0.008 0.018 +1-0.001 20010358 4/17/2001 5/11/2001 0.009 0.024 +/-0.001 20010408 5/1/2001 5/15/2001 0.008 0.023 +/-0.001 20010442 5/15/2001 5/29/2001 0.007 0.022 +/-0.001 20010478 5/29/2001 6/12/2001 0.008 0.010 +/-0.001 20010534 6/12/2001 6/26/2001 0.008 0.021 +/-0.001 20010574 6/26/2001 7/9/2001 0.008 0.012 +1-0.001 20010619 7/9/2001 7/23/2001 0.009 0.019 +/-0.001 20010652 7/23/2001 8/6/2001 0.009 0.016 +/-0.001 20010680 8/6/2001 8/20/2001 0.008 0.016 +1-0.001 20010709 8/20/2001 9/4/2001 0.009 0.018 +/-0.001 20010743 9/4/2001 9/17/2001 0.008 0.019 +/-0.001 20010804 9/17/2001 10/1/2001 0.007 0.029 +1-0.001 20010864 10/1/2001 10/15/2001 0.009 0.021 +1-0.001 20010916 10/15/2001 10/29/2001 0.007 0.019 +1-0.001 20010961 10/29/2001 11/13/2001 0.008 0.044 +/-0.002 20010992 11/13/2001 11/27/2001 0.008 0.025 +/-0.001 20011029 11/27/2001 12/10/2001 0.009 0.024 +1-0.001 20011078 12/10/2001 12/20/2001 0.009 0.023 +/-0.002 Average: 0.022 Maximum: 0.044 Minimum: 0.010 Table 1.4 Sample Type: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge - Control Location AGC Analysis: Gross 3Beta and Iodine Units: pCi/m LLD (pCilmA3) 0.07 0.01 LAB ID START DATE END DATE 1-131 GROSS BETA 20010017 12/27/2000 1/9/2001 0.009 0.008 +/-0.001 20010058 1/9/2001 1/23/2001 0.006 0.020 +/-0.001 20010095 1/23/2001 2/5/2001 0.011 0.023 +/-0.001 20010123 2/5/2001 2/19/2001 0.006 0.018 +/-0.001 20010155 2/19/2001 3/6/2001 0.007 0.017 +/-0.001 20010193 3/6/2001 3/20/2001 0.006 0.017 +/-0.001 20010236 3/20/2001 413/2001 0.006 0.018 +/-0.001 20010304 4/3/2001 4/17/2001 0.005 0.018 +/-0.001 20010359 4/17/2001 5/11/2001 0.006 0.020 +/-0.001 20010409 5/1/2001 5/15/2001 0.008 0.019 +/-0.001 20010443 5/15/2001 5/29/2001 0.006 0.018 +/-0.001 20010479 5/29/2001 6/12/2001 0.007 0.009 +/-0.001 20010535 6/12/2001 6/26/2001 0.006 0.016 +/-0.001 20010575 6/26/2001 7/9/2001 0.005 0.011 +/-0.001 20010620 7/9/2001 7/23/2001 0.007 0.016 +/-0.001 20010653 7/23/2001 8/6/2001 0.007 0.017 +/-0.001 20010681 8/6/2001 8/20/2001 0.007 0.014 +/-0.001 20010710 8/20/2001 9/4/2001 0.007 0.018 +/-0.001 20010744 914/2001 9/17/2001 0.007 0.018 +1-0.001 20010805 9/17/2001 10/1/2001 0.007 0.030 +/-0.001 20010865 10/1/2001 10/15/2001 0.006 0.022 +1-0.001 20010917 1011512001 10/29/2001 0.007 0.019 +/-0.001 20010962 10/29/2001 11/13/2001 0.008 0.039 +/-0.002 20010993 11/13/2001 11/27/2001 0.007 0.027 +/-0.001 20011030 11/27/2001 12/10/2001 0.008 0.023 +/-0.001 20011079 12/10/2001 12/20/2001 0.006 0.024 +/-0-002 Average: 0.019 Maximum: 0.039 Minimum: 0.008 Table 2.1 Sample Type: Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Analysis: mR Exposure Units: mrem/Qtr INDICATORS IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR MEAN TAI 11.54 9.98 9.87 9.70 10.27 TBI 16.04 14.43 13.53 14.39 14.60 TC1 15.45 14.34 13.14 14.00 14.23 TD1 15.21 14.80 13.83 14.10 14.49 TEl 14.74 13.87 13.14 13.71 13.86 TF1 13.67 13.13 12.35 12.73 12.97 TG1 15.57 14.61 13.43 14.68 14.58 TH1 12.02 11.83 11.16 10.87 11.47 TJ1 14.62 12.85 12.35 12.04 12.97 TK1 14.86 13.78 12.64 13.51 13.70 TLl 13.44 13.69 12.74 14.00 13.47 TMI 12.61 12.20 10.47 11.36 11.66 TNI 11.78 11.55 10.76 10.87 11.24 TP1 13.20 12.20 11.26 11.65 12.08 TQI 10.60 9.98 9.28 9.89 9.94 TR1 10.95 10.62 8.98 9.89 10.11 MAX 16.04 14.80 13.83 14.68 14.60 AVG 13.52 12.74 11.81 12.34 12.60 MIN 10.60 9.98 8.98 9.70 9.94 SPECIALS 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR MEAN TCS 14.03 12.30 11.85 12.04 12.55 TNS 12.85 12.11 11.65 12.04 12.16 TQS1 15.33 14.15 13.43 13.61 14.13 TQS2 13.44 12.48 11.16 12.34 12.35 TRS 15.33 15.36 13.53 13.90 14.53 MAX 15.33 15.36 13.53 13.90 14.53 AVG 14.20 13.28 12.33 12.79 13.15 MIN 12.85 12.11 11.16 12.04 12.16 CONTROLS IST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR MEAN TAC 14.15 14.89 14.92 14.78 14.69 TEC 14.50 13.97 13.24 14.00 13.93 TGS 16.16 15.17 14.72 15.37 15.36 MAX 16.16 15.17 14.92 15.37 15.36 AVG 14.94 14.68 14.29 14.72 14.66 MIN 14.15 13.97 13.24 14.00 13.93 INDICATOR CONTROL SPECIAL MAX 16.04 16.16 15.36 AVG 12.60 14.66 13.15 MIN 8.98 13.24 11.16 Table 3.1 Sample Type: Surface Water Analysis: Gamma Isotopic and Tritium Units: pCi/i 30 15 30 15 15 18 60 15 LLD (pCi/l) 15 15 30 15 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 LAB ID LOCATION DATE MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 K 6.33

  • 3.93
  • 5.69
  • 4.52
  • 3.46
  • 4.39 < 11.1
  • 2.17 SWD 2/5/2001 < 5.25 < 3.43
  • 5.46
  • 4.00 20010096
  • 5.04
  • 6.03
  • 4.01
  • 7.79
  • 3.79
  • 5.98 K 5.02
  • 16.7 K 5.58 20010098 SWU 2/5/2001 < 4.66 < 4.54
  • 7.59 K 4.00
  • 6.33 K 5.64
  • 6.66
  • 3.78 K 4.82 K 3.58
  • 14.7 K 4.59 20010319 SWD 4/23/2001 < 3.33 < 3.21
  • 8.10
  • 7.96 K 3.21
  • 8.58
  • 5.70
  • 4.98
  • 4.32
  • 14.9 K 4.70 4/23/2001 < 4.01 < 5.44 K 9.74 K 4.49 20010320 SWU K 11.7
  • 4.47 < 9.45 K 5.83
  • 5.44
  • 7.48
  • 21.1 K 7.02 SWD 7/23/2001 < 6.75 < 4.99 K 6.02
  • 5.97 20010622 K 6.57
  • 4.45
  • 9.47 K 5.27
  • 4.79
  • 5.71
  • 18.9 K 5.23 7/23/2001 < 7.08 < 5.79 K 8.45 K 6.07 20010623 SWU
  • 7.24
  • 5.93 K 4.54 K 4.55
  • 6.87
  • 5.13
  • 5.05 K 6.47
  • 15.6 K 3.48 20010898 SWU 10/23/2001 < 5.47 < 6.15 K 4.09
  • 8.06
  • 4.06
  • 4.67
  • 5.42
  • 16.6 K 6.02 SWD 10/23/2001 < 5.13 < 4.98 < 8.25
  • 5.54 K 8.56 20010900 LLD (pCi/l) 3000 LAB ID LOCATION DATE TRITIUM SWD 2/5/2001 < 550 20010097 20010099 SwU 2/5/2001 < 555 20010321 SWD 4/23/2001 < 548 SwU 4/23/2001 < 562 20010322 SWD 7/23/2001 < 541 20010622 20010623 SWU 7/23/2001 < 540 20010899 SwU 10/23/2001 < 554 SWD 10/23/2001 < 557 20010901

- 34 -

Table 4.1 Sample Type: Gr oundwater Analysis: Ga mma Isotopic and Tritium Units: pCi/1 LLD (pCi/1) 15 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 15 18 60 15 LOCATION DATE MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA- 140 LAB ID 20010448 wU 5/31/2001

  • 5.21
  • 3.81 8.81
  • 3.51
  • 7.39
  • 5.42
  • 8.74
  • 5.66 K 4.30 K 4.71
  • 15.6
  • 6.00 13.1
  • 5.57
  • 10.8 K 7.02
  • 8.35
  • 6.34 K 5.37
  • 6.80
  • 22.2 K 5.22 20010450 WD 5/31/2001
  • 4.92
  • 6.30 5.06
  • 12.8
  • 6.79
  • 10.4
  • 7.30
  • 6.23
  • 7.51
  • 22.0 K 4.56 20011057 WD 12/17/2001
  • 6.80
  • 7.12 14.0 K 10.8 K 4.61
  • 18.6
  • 7.97
  • 11.9 K 6.16
  • 7.71
  • 5.44 K 23.1 K 9.53 20011059 wU 12/17/2001
  • 6.56
  • 6.14 LLD(pC!/I) 3000 LAB ID I .OCATION DATE TRITIUM LOCATION DATE 20010449 WU (Control) 5/31/2001 < 543 20010451 WD (Indicator) 5/31/2001
  • 544 20011058 WD (Indicator) 12/17/2001
  • 535 20011060 WU (Control) 12/17/2001 K 539 Table 5.1 Sample Type: Shoreline Sediment Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg, dry LLD (pCi/kg) 150 180 LAB ID DATE CS-134 CS-137 CS-134 20020029 1/14/2002* < 25.2 < 37.5
  • Sample collected during January, 2002, due to high river stages during scheduled collection period Table 6.1 Sample Type: Food Products Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg, wet LLD(pCi/kg, wet) 60 60 80 LAB ID DATE LOCATION 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 20010029 1/11/2001 GN1 (Indicator) < 27.1
  • 26.5
  • 30.0 20010070 1/30/2001 GQC (Control) < 40.9 < 30.8 < 44.8 20010318 4/23/2001 GN1 (Indicator < 31.1 < 32.4 < 37.2 20010410 5/15/2001 GQC (Control < 46.3 < 37.2 < 46.7 20010621 7/23/2001 GN1 (Indicator < 28.5 < 22.4 < 32.1 20010659 8/13/2001 GQC (Control < 24.3 < 24.4 < 24.8 20010897 10/23/2001 GN1 (Indicator < 45.6 < 58.1 < 36.7 20010970 11/20/2001 GQC (Control < 30.5 < 26.7 < 28.9' Table 7.1 Sample Type: Fish Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg, wet 130 260 130 260 130 150 LLD(pCi/kg, w( 130 "IlATi. I ACCATTAN MN-54 C0-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 CS-134 CS-137 LAB ID LOCATION MN-54 CO-58 DATE

< 89.6 < 67.1 < 165 < 68.0 < 165 < 88.6 < 89.2 20011096 12/31/2001 FU (Control)

< 78.9 < 110 < 159 < 130 < 201 < 87.2 < 90.6 20011097 12/31/2001 FD (Indicator)

Table 8.1 Sample Type: Se diments (Special)

Analysis: G unma Isotopic Units: p( :i/kg, dry LLD (pCilkg, dry) 150 180 LAB ID DATE LOCATION CS-134 CS-137 20010180 3/7/2001 WEST CREEK < 17.6 < 18.7 20010181 3/7/2001 EAST CREEK < 13.9 < 12.0 20010413 5/16/2001 EAST CREEK < 12.7 < 15.0 20010414 5/16/2001 WEST CREEK < 16.2 < 17.4 20010662 8/14/2001 WEST CREEK < 17.6 < 22.7 20010663 8/14/2001 EAST CREEK < 14.8 < 12.4 20010936 11/5/2001 WEST CREEK < 15.6 < 13.1 20010937 11/5/2001 EAST CREEK < 16.9 < 17.6 Table 9.1 Sample Type: Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent (Special)

Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/i LLD (pCi/l) 15 15 30 15 30 15 30 15 15 18 60 15 LAB ID DATE MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA- 140 20010084 1/31/2001 < 3.91 < 4.49 < 12.0 < 4.41 < 8.12 < 6.12 < 3.85 < 6.47 < 6.73 < 4.51 < 24.6 < 4.84 20010150 2/28/2001 < 6.20 < 5.54 < 11.1 < 4.58 < 7.14 < 4.37 < 7.31 < 5.50 < 5.30 < 4.95 < 13.5 < 6.38 20010231 3/28/2001 < 3.02 < 3.87 < 8.85 < 5.52 < 8.53 < 4.85 < 6.99 < 5.23 < 5.10 < 3.24 < 20.0 < 8,00 20010337 4/25/2001 < 4.01 < 2.96 < 8.62 < 5.42 < 8.71 < 3.53 < 9.32 < 5.96 < 6.15 < 6.01 < 14.7 < 4.36 20010452 5/30/2001 < 4.20 < 3.71 < 7.58 < 4.08 < 7.78 < 2.53 < 7.00 < 4.58 < 3.74 < 4.93 < 13.1 < 3.96 20010544 6/28/2001 < 4.04 < 2.89 < 5.39 < 4.07 < 6.59 < 3.65 < 5.62 < 3.71 < 4.11 < 3.32 < 12.4 < 5.29 20010627 7/26/2001 < 3.57 < 4.23 < 6.86 < 5.54 < 10.5 < 4.60 < 7.07 < 3.36 < 4.91 < 5.52 < 15.3 < 5.61 20010706 8/30/2001 < 3.67 < 2.61 < 4.24 < 4.49 < 10.3 < 4.06 < 6.93 < 3.21 < 4.04 < 4.28 < 12.5 < 4.53 20010796 9/26/2001 < 3.22 < 3.68 < 8.31 < 4.67 < 7.35 < 4.58 < 7.63 < 4.77 < 4.51 < 4.11 < 13.3 < 5.31 20010944 10/31/2001 < 7.78 < 6.28 < 20.1 < 8.40 < 15.1 < 10.2 < 11.0 < 14.8 < 8.91 < 8.48 < 37.0 < 11.0 20011001 11/29/2001 < 6.88 < 7.71 < 12.0 < 9.85 < 12.8 < 5.04 < 7.52 < 4.55 < 6.57 < 5.72 < 22.1 < 4.62 20011087 12/26/2001 < 4.63 < 5.43 < 10.7 < 4.35 < 11.3 < 6.03 < 4.81 < 4.71 < 4.76 < 5.45 < 21.0 < 6.11 Table 10. 1 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Analysis: Gross Beta, Iodine-i 31, and Gamma Isotopic Sample Type (units) Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS Value a Value N-Dev b N Rangec BETA 90.0 +/- 17.3 93.0 0.60 0.065 Air Filter E2818-125 9/20/01 (pCi/filter)_________

Cacoaltri E2673A-125 6/14/01 1-131 80.0 +/- 13.9 79.8 -0.04 0.148 Charcoal Cartridge E2908-125 12/6/01 1-131 91.0 +/- 15.8 90.8 -0.03 0.467 (pCilcartride)

E2576-125 3/22/01 1 BETA 168 43.7 162 -0.414- U./-lIl Water 4I I 240 .5. 0.391 E2574-125 3/22/01 CR-51 242 +/- 21.0 -0.29 0.391 (pCi/liter) 101 +/- 8.75 104 1.03 0.234 MN-54 48.0 +/- 8.66 47.2 -0.28 0.189 CO-58 84.0 +/- 8.66 89.5 1.91 0.992 FE-59 CO-60 147 +/- 12.7 144 -0.63 0.643 ZN-65 186 +/- 32.2 180 -0.59 0.064 90.0 +/-15.6 89.6 -0.08 0.965 1-131 129+/- 11.2 132 0.90 0.733 CS-1 34 102 +/- 8.83 101 -0.37 0.845 CS-1 37 94.0 +/- 8.66 93.4 -0.21 0.697 CE-141 N I 251 I E2575-125 3/22/01 CR-51 242 +/- 21.0 1.24 2.734 101 +/- 8.75 103 0.57 0.234 (Duplicate) MN-54 48.0 +/- 8.66 52.3 1.48 0.295 CO-58 84.0 +/- 8.66 91.6 2.63 0.697 FE-59 147 +/- 12.7 140 -1.57 0.321 CO-60 186 +/- 32.2 187 0.09 0.349 ZN-65 90.0 +/-15.6 93.7 0.72 1.523 1-131 129 +/- 11.2 128.7 -0.09 0.733 CS-1 34 102 +/- 8.83 99.8 -0.76 0.220 CS-137 94.0 +/- 8.66 94.9 0.32 0.591 CE-141

_______________________ a - a - I -

- 40 -

Table 10. 1 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Analysis: Tritium and Gamma Isotopic Sample Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS Type (units) Value a Value N-Dev b N-Rangec Water E2674-125 6/14/01 H-3 7494 +/- 1298 7635 0.33 0.130 (pCi/liter) E2816-125 9/20101 CR-51 265 +/- 23.0 269 0.48 1.382 MN-54 149 +/- 12.9 155 1.39 0.000 CO-58 128 +/- 11.1 127 -0.27 0.369 FE-59 62.0 +/- 8.66 70.0 2.84 0.473 CO-60 193 +/- 16.7 197 0.78 0.551 ZN-65 18431.9 185 0.06 0.032 1-131 60.0 + 10.4 59.0 -0.19 0.276 CS-134 116 +/- 10.1 109 -2.09 0.204 CS-137 232 20.1 233 0.15 0.815 CE-141 88.0 + 8.66 91.0 1.17 1.004 E2817-125 9/20/01 CR-51 265 23.0 269 0.57 0.401 (Duplicate) MN-54 149 +/- 12.9 155 1.47 0.159 CO-58 128 11.1 128 0.09 0.646 FE-59 62.0 +/- 8.66 71 3.24d 0.366 CO-60 193 16.7 195 0.30 0.796 ZN-65 184 +/- 31.9 189 0.44 0.225 1-131 60.0 +/- 10.4 59.7 -0.09 0.226 CS-134 116 +/- 10.1 111 -1.39 0.306 CS-1 37 232 +/- 20.1 230 -0.35 0.153 CE-141 88.0 +/- 8.66 94 2.24 0.236 Table 10. 1 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Sample Study Date Analysis Known RBS RBS RBS Type (units) Value a Value N-Dev b N-Range E2909-125 12/6/01 CR-51 0.631 t 0.055 0.613 -0.97 0.600 Sediment (pCi/gram) MN-54 0.189 +/- 0.033 0.207 1.69 0.241 Co-58 0.115 +/- 0.010 0.117 0.68 0.267 FE-59 0.129 +/- 0.022 0.145 2.10 0.545 CO-60 0.449 +/- 0.039 0.465 1.21 0.465 ZN-65 0.262 +/- 0.045 0.288 1.70 0.187 CS-1 34 0.252 +/- 0.022 0.250 -0.29 0.319 CS-1 37 0.531+/- 0.046 0.537 0.39 0.707 CE-141 0.481 +/- 0.042 0.498 1.20 0.069 NOTES:

(a) The "known" values are listed with a range reflecting control (3 sigma) limits.

(b) The normalized deviation from the "known" value is computed from the deviation and the standard error of the mean; +/-2.000 is the warning limit and +/-3.000 is the control limit. This is a measure of accuracy of the analytical methods.

(c) The normalized range is computed from the mean range, the control limit, and the standard error of the range;

+2.000 is the warning limit and +3.000 is the control limit. This is a measure of precision of the analytical methods.

(d) The results reported were out of the control limits.

Interlaboratory Comparison Program Exceptions:

There was one result outside the control limits (3 sigma) for accuracy in the 2001 cross check program. This result was related to a gamma isotopic analysis of a water sample.

The nuclide, Fe-59, was bias high in a gamma isotopic analysis, with a normalized deviation of 3.24, with control limits of +/- 3.00. This result is considered conservative.

The bias high results for Fe-59 is contributed to coincidence summing effects. A summing correction was employed in the past, but was discontinued due to the production of non conservative low bias results. Other Fe-59 analyses during the year were all within acceptable limits.

There is no impact accessed on previously reported data due to the bias high result of Fe

59. Environmental samples are analyzed and reported with a ninety-five percent confidence level that the analytical result with its associated error encompasses the "true" value. Ninety-eight percent of RBS environmental crosscheck results were within control limits for accuracy during 2001.