ML042190118
| ML042190118 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Browns Ferry, Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/17/2004 |
| From: | Ernstes M Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch |
| To: | Bradley Jones Duke Energy Corp |
| References | |
| 50-269/04-301, 50-270/04-301, 50-287/04-301 | |
| Download: ML042190118 (39) | |
See also: IR 05000269/2004301
Text
Ad ministrative Documents
OCONEE JUNE 2004 EXAM
50-269/2004-301,
50-270/2004-301, &
50-28712004-301
JUNE 14 18 & 25,2004 -
1.d Exam Preparation Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-20?-1/
2. Exam Outline Quality Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-201-2 /
3. ~xam Security Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-201-3
,
4. J Administrative Topics Outline (Finai) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-1/
5. JControl ~ s o m Syste and Facility Walk-through Test Outline
(Final) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-2 /*
6. /Operating Test Quality check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-302 -3 w
7. / Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . E S - 3 0 1 d
8.J Transient and Ev Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-5 /
9. , Competencies C klist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-6 /
10. /Written Exam Quality Cheek Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401- 6J /,
11, /Written Exam R orksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401-9
Quality Checklist
......................
. . . . . . . . . . ES-403-1
?J
bewb-~ o g R ~c ~~- 7 7 6D R ATED V - J B - Q ~3 u B M i r 9 i 1 3 6 ,EXAM
-... ...
cs-20' ....
__. .. .....-Exan-inztiorl
... Prepars!!m%ck(sist FO[XES:rn
Facility: 13krCaLaca Date of Examination:
Chief
Task Description I Reference xamlner's
initials
- assignment sheet updated
- waiver
orization granted to give written exams
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate ;~$kz:zh? letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordinatioi
with the facility licensee.
Applies only to examinations prepared by the NWC.
23 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
3-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist F C JES-20'1-2
~
nitial Submittal
.~
Item Task Description
~
1.
w
R
i
T
T
E
N
2.
S b. Assess whether there are enouah scenario sets land wares) to test the woiected number
and m,x of appikonis in awoidance w th t:ie expectao c r w compos lion and rotatior.
I I - I 11
i
hl sched,le fi:lhoit compiom s.ng exaiii integrity, ensure cam appiicant an be taoled Jsllly
a i east one new or signitcanily niwifiad sceliaiic, that n@scenar,ns are dwl'ca1t.d lrC:it (lie i
__
3. a. Verify that:
(1) the outline@)contain(s) the required number of control room and in-piant tasks,
W (2) no more than 30% of the test material is repeated from the last NRC examination,
/ f3P no tasks are duolicated from the aooiicants'audit tesUsl. and
I
~I
T (4) no mRie than 86% of any operating'test is taken direcil; from the licensee's exam banks.
are distributed among the safety function groupings as specified in ESdOl,
is conducted in a low-power or shutdown condition,
for SRO-Uj of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path
4.
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer ('j
c. NHC Chief Examiner ( t )
d. NRC Supervisor
Note: * Not appiicab!e for NRC-developed examinations.
NUREG-I 02t. Draft Revision 9
E§-201 Examination Security Agreement Form E§-201-3
1. Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 6-14/21-2004 as of the date of my
signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief
examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing
examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore. I am
aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of
this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility
management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the
week(s) of 6-i4/21-2004 From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did net instruct, evaluate, or
provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the
NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY DATE NOTE
1. &s;dWSHCW
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
IO.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. ____
Y=L3 / l/AcI\Bplk&
NOTES:
NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3
1. Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specializsd knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 6-14/22-2004 as of the date of my
signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief
examiner. I understand that I am not to inshuct. evaluate. or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing
examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am
aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of
this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility
management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination
To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the
week(?.) of 6-64\21-2004 From the date that I entered intc this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or
provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations. except as specifically noted below and authorized by the
NRC.
JOB TITLE I RE
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
1 Facility: Qconee Date of Examination: June, 2004
Examination Level (circle one): RQ / SRQ Operating Test Number:
Describe activity to be performed
Admin-100, Deterrnlne SDM with a Dropped Control
Conduct of Operations
Rod
GEN 2.1.23 (3.9/4.0) PT/f/N1103/15, Reactivity Balance (10 min)
Admin-103, Perform Manual RCS Leakage Calculation;
Conduct of Operations PT/0600/01Q (RQ Only)
GEN 2.1.7 (3.7/4.4) (last exam) (group activity) (18 rnin)
Admin-202, Perform Surveillance to Verify SSF RCMUP
Equipment Control Operability
GEN 2.2.12 (3.0/3.4) PT16001001 Encl. 13.1 (Mode 1 & 2) (new) (15 rnin)
Radiation Control
GEN 2.3.4 (2.5131)
Admin-402, Perform Actions for Medical Emergency
RP/1000/016, Encl. 4.1 (Medical Response)
GEN 2.4.39(3.3/3.1)
(RO Only) (15 min)
are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items
unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-304-1
Final Submittal
le one): RO / SRO Operating Test Number:
Describe activity to be performed
Admin-100, Determine SBM with a Dropped Control
Conduct of Operations
Rod
GEN 2.1.23 (3.Wl.O)
PT/l/A/1103/15, Reactivity Balance (18 min)
Conduct of Operations Admin-110, Determine Minimum Shift Staffing
GEN 2.1.4 (2.3/3.4) SLC 16.13.1, Minimum Station Staffing Requirements
(new) (SRO only) (15 min)
Admin-202, Perform surveillance to verify SSF RCMUP
Equipment Control
Operability
GEN 2.2.12 (3.0/3.4)
PT/600/001, End. 13.1 (Mode 7 & 2) (new) (15 min)
Radiation Control Admin-300, Calculate the Maximum Permissible Stay
GEM 2.3.4 (2.5/3.1) Time Within Emergency Dose Limits
(last exam) (Sa0 only) (20min)
Admin-403, Determine Emergency Classification and
Protective Action Recommendations
I GEN 2.4.38(2.Z4.0) (SRO only) (group activity) (20 min)
are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items
only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
E§-301 Control Roodln-Plant Outline Form ES-301-2
System / JPM Title
APilIAI1700/15, OP/O/AI1105/09, Encl4.10
IKA: EPE-009 EA1. I 3 (4.4/4.4)1 (6 min)
1 c. CRO-97, Transfer ECCS Suction to the Emergency Sump (1LP-I5
Failed Closed) I D.. A.. S.
.L
[I EOP, Enclosure 5.12 [KA:BW/E08 EA1 .I (4.0/3.7)] (PRA) (9 min)
d. CRO-015, Establish EFDW Flow Through Startup Valves
EOP Enclosure 5.27, Alternate Methods for Controlling EFDW Flow
IKA: BW/A02 AAl.l (4.0/3.8)1 (new) (20 min)
f. CRO-060, Perform Required Actions For Turbine Building Flood
AP/lO (Turbine Building Flood) B, s 8
IKA: APE BW/A07 AAI .3(3.3/3.5)1 (7 min)
g. CRO-900, Release GWD Tank
OW1&2/AI1104/018 Encl. 4.9 (GWD Tank Release)
In-Plant Systems (3 for 8 0 ; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U)
i. NLO-039, Prime The Spent Fuel Pool Fill Line
EOP Encl. 5.7, HPI Pump Operations from ASW Pump Switchgear
1 [KA: APE022 AK3.02 (3.5/3.8)] (16 min) 1
j. CRO-053, Bypass Coolant Pump Starting Interlocks
OP/I 107/004 Enclosure 4.2 IKA: 062 A3.04 (2.7/2.9)1(9 rnin))
- Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (6)ontroi room,
(S)imulator, (L)ow-Power, (R)CA
NUWEG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Control Room/ln-Plant Outline Form ES-301-2
Facility: Oconee Date of Examination: June, 2004
Exam bevel (circle one): RO / SRO(I) / SRO(U) Operating Test No.:
Control Room Systems (8for RO; 7 for SRQ-1; 2 or 3 for SRO-U)
System / JPM Title Type Code Safety
Function
a. CRO-O12A, Recover a dropped rod
AP/l/Af1700/15, OP/O/Af1105/09, Encl 4.10
[KA: 005 AA2.03 (3.5/4.4)] (20 min)
b. CRO- 067, Perform Required Actions for ES Actuation (> 3psig)
EQP Enclosure 5.1 (ES Actuation)
[KA: EPE-009 EAl.13 (4.4/4.4)] (6 min)
Failed Closed)
EBP, Enclosure 5.12 [KA:BW/E08 E A l . l (4.0/3.7)] (PRA) (9 min)
d. CRO-015, Establish EFBW Flow Through Startup Valves
EOP Enclosure 5.27, Alternate Methods for Controlling EFBW Flow B, S,L 4s
[APE-054 AA2.04 (4.2/4.3)] (20 rnin)
e. CRO-700, Place ICS In Auto following Loss Of Auto Power
AP/23 (Loss Of ICs Power) Enclosure 5.5 (Placing ICs In Auto) 7
[W BWIA02 AAl.l (4.0/3.8)] (new) 15 min)
f. CRO-060, Perform Required Actions For Turbine Building Flood
AP/lO (Turbine Building Flood) 8
I K A APE BW/A07 AA1.3 (3.3/3.5)1 f7 min)
g. CRO-900, Release GWD Tank
OP/1&YN1104/018 End. 4.9 (GWB Tank Release)
In-Plant Svstems
~* (3 for RO:3 for SRO-I: 3 or 2 for SRO-U)
i. NLO-039, Prime The Spent Fuel Pool Fill Line
EOP Encl. 5.7, #PI Pump Operations from ASW Pump Switchgear I D, L, R 1 2
[KA: APE022 AK3.02 (3.5/3.8)] (16 min)
i. CRO-053, Bypass Coolant Pump Starting interlocks
EOP Encl. 5.14 [KA: EPE074 AAl .Ol (3.6/3.9)1 (7 min)
k. NLO-036, Startup A Vital Bus Inverter
OW1107/004 Enclosure 4.2 [KA: 062 A3.04 (2.7/2.9)] (9 min)) B 6
- Type Codes: (B)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (A)lternate path, (C)ontrol room,
(S)imtilator, &)ow-Power, (R)CA
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Control Room/ln-Plant Outline Form ES-301-2
Facility: Oconee Bate of Examination: June, 2004
Exam Level (circle one): RO / SRO(I) / SRQ(U) Operating Test No.:
Control Room Systems (& for RO;7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO-U)
System / JPM Title Type Code* Safety
Function
....... ..I
...
...
..L
- ..............
b. CRO- 067, Perform Required Actions for ES Actuation (> 3psig)
EOP Enclosure 5.1 (ES Actuation)
[KA: EPE-009 EA1.13 (4.4/4.4)] (6 min)
d. CRO-015, Establish EFDW Flow Through Startup Valves
! D,A, Ss I
EOP Enclosure 5.27, Alternate Methods for Controlling EFDW Flow D, s, L 4s
[APE-054 AA2.04 14.2/4.3)1(6
I. . mid I I
e. CRO-700, Place IC§ In Auto following Loss of Auto Power I N, A, S
AP/23 (Loss Of ICs Power) Enclosure 5.5 (Placing iCS In Auto) I
EQP Encl. 5.7, #PI Pump Operations from ASW Pump Switchgear
[KA: APE022 AK3.02 (3.5/3.8)](16 min)
k. NLO-036, Startup A Vital Bus Inverter
OP/1407/004 Enclosure 4.2 IKA: 062 A3.04 (2.7/2.9)1 (9 min)) I D
- Type Codes: (D)irect from bank, (M)odified from bank, (N)ew, (AJlternatepath, (C)ontrol room,
(S)imulator, &)ow-Power, (R)CA
NUREG-1027, Draft Revision 9
-. .. ... .
- .. ......-. ....-.......-
ES-301 ..... .. ..
Operaring Tesi'auality Checklist .....-. .....-. .....Form FjS-301-3
iitial Submittal
___yi_...
Facilily: Oconee Dat@of Examination: June 14,2004 Operating Test Number: 1
nitiais
1. GENERAL CRlTERlA 1-
1I:e cpcral'ng lest confornls win the preuiu.lsly aDprovea 0Llii:ie cnanges ard cons~S1dnlM!h
sarnp:ina rest. rements (e.$. :O CF4 55.45. overat ona imponance. snfery funct on i!istnnvt.an).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition belween this and other operating tests to be administered
during this examinatin.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' zudit test(s)(see Sectior D.l .a).
d. Overlap with the written examinatior and between different pans of the Operating test is within
acceptable limits.
R It dpzars that lie oper31 ng le51 .,,I.udferent ate vetweeti competeiit ai80 less-Inan-c@m~elenl
app cinw a1 Inr des a r d t c :censo leve
2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial mditions
. initiating cues
references and toois. including assosiated procedures
rea-- able and validated time lifits (average time allowed For completion) and specific
designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee
specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions N,ith sxact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- Statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
- identificationof critical steps and their associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
b. Repetitionfrom operating tests used during the pievioirs licensing examination is within
acceptable limits (30% for the walk-through) and do not compromise test integrity
C. At least 20 percent of the JPMs on each test are new or significantly modified.
3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA
a. The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with
Form E§-301-4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Name / Signature Dat@
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewerr)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
9. NRC Supervisor
NOTE: * The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c: chief examiner concurrence required.
NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
. .. . .. .. . . .
- sa01
~. .. ...
Simulator
. .
Scenaric
. . .....Quality
. Cqecklist
. .
.
Form ES-301.:4-
'inal Submittal
_p____
Facility: Qconee Date of Exam: June 14,1004 Scenario Numbers: 1 I2 t 3 Operating Test No.: f
1. The itiitiaJ conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor instrumentationmay be out of
service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. I
3.
-
Each event description consists of:
the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
the malfunction(s)that are entered to initiate the event
the syrnptmslcues that will be visible to the crew
the expected operator actions (by shin position)
the event termination point (if applicable)
4. No more than one non-meehanistic failure (e.g.. Ppe break) is incorporated into the scenario
without a credible precediny incident such as a seismic event.
tion team to obtain
have sufficient time to carry out expected adivities without undue time constraints. Cues are
given.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
ed. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open simulator
eeri evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained
10 Every ocerator w I % evalilatea :.jng a! :east one new or s yn.f conGy mod feo srznar a. A
orhc; sceim os liaie m e n B Iereo .n accordance witn QPC!.U.I D.5 of ES. 301
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified usinQForm ES-301-6(submit
the form along with the slmulatoi scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly invoived in the minimum number of transients and events
1. Total malfunctions (5-6)
2. Malfunctions afler EOP entry (1-2)
3. Ahnormal events (2-4)
4. Major transients (1-2)
NUREG-1021 Draft Revision 9
~
~. . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ .. ~ .... ~...
E S - ~ .Transientand
. ~ ~ ~Event ~ Checklist
- . -. . . . Form ES-301-5
~'.. ..
.. ..-
Final Subrniikl
OPERATING TEST NO.: 1
.. .
AsSRO !: Instrument/ 2* 2, 3
j Component
8 i
Instructions: (1) Enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each evolution
(2) %t&tivity manipulations ma be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal
conditions refer to Section 8.5.d) but must be significant per Section 6.2.a of
Append!x
~~~ ~
d.
~
- Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional
instrument or comoonent malfunctions on a one-for-onn
~. . . basis
(3: Wnenever praci cat. both insltynent arid component ma:fLnclions s h o ~ ! dbe
included; only those that require verifiable actiow that provide insight to the
app1;cant's competerice count toward rtie r i i n i m m i'euuireinenl.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
E§-304 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
Final Submittal
Competencies SCENARIO
-
2
-
Interpret / Diagnose 2,3.4
Events and Conditions
Comply With and 2,3.4 2,3,4
5, 6. 7 5,6, 7
Use Procedures (1) 8 8
Operate Control
Boards (2)
1, 2,3
Communicate and 4. 5,6
7. 8
lnteract
Demonstrate 3,4,5
Supervisory 6.7,8
9
Ability (3)
Comply With and 3, 5
Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2) Optional for an §BO-U.
(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Circle the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will ailow the examiners to
evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
Author:
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-6
Qualitv Checklist
~~ ~
Final Submittal
3. SRO questions are appropriate per Section D.2.d of ES-401
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as
indicated below (ch@&the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; 01
g t h e examinations were developed independently; or
the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
6. Bank use meets limits (nu more than 75 percent
from the bank at least 10 percent new, and the
rest madified); enter the actual RO / SRO-only
question distribution(s) at right
7. Belween 50 and 60 percent of the questions on
the 80 exam are written at the
comprehensionianalysislevel; the SRO exam may 32 / 8 43 i 17
exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected WAS
suppart the higher cognitive levels; enter the
actual RB / SRO question distribution(s) at right
Referencedhandoutsprovided do not give away answers I
approved examination outline and is appropriate fur the Tier to which they are
assioned: deviations are iustitied
IO. Question psychometric quality and format meet ES, Appendix B, guiddlnes
b. Facility Reviewer (')
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Form 3-401-6
Quality Checklist
nitial Submittal
Facility: Oeonee Date of Exam: June 14,2004 Exam Level: RQ/SRO
- I
4. Question selection and duplication from the last two NRC licensing exams
indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
-the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed: or
the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
z t h e examinations were developed independently:or
-the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
support the higher cognitive levels: enter the
actual RO ISRQ question distribution@)at right
e. Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers
9. Question content conforms with specific KIA statements in the previously
11. The exam contains. the required number of one-point, multiple choice items:
Prlnted Name I Si Date
a. Author Jgr.&Ef
b. Facility Reviewer (*) Y*$
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) 5 5 0
d . NRC Regional Supervisor d-I-2oei'
-
Note: * The facility reviewer's initialdsignature are not applicable for NRC-developedexaminations.
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 OCONEE 2004-301 Written Examination Form ES-401-9
Review Worksheet
Instructions
!Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix El for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2. Enter the level 01 difficulty (LOB) of sack question using a t ~ 5 (easy - difficult) rating scaie (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).
~
3. Check the appropriate box if a psychmetric fiaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the Correct enswer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors wntain cues (i.e.. clues, specific determiners, phrasing, longth, etc).
The answer choices are a coilection of unreialed truelfalse statements.
One or more distractors is not credible.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4. Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (is., the question has a valid WA but, as written. is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledgp that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (Le., it IS not required to be known from memory)
The question contains data with an unrealistic !eve1 of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with ttla approved W A and thoso that are desiqnated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6. Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as Writt@n(U)nacceptable(requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E,!ditorial enhancement. M (S)atisfactory?
7. At a minimum. exprain any "u" ratings (e.g., how
t h y
ROISRO Combined Question
S 1008~~3.05 Matches WA. New
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws
U!E/S I 7.
Exolanatim
Licensee claims to have had pump impeller
dama.ge similar fo this. OK
Licensee will work on new question (Offered to
S help write a question) Question rewrftten. SAT
I IS 1026AA2.03 ADDearS to match the WA Bank
I IU 029EK3.11WA not matched. The WA asks for
reasons whv actions are taken. This auestion ask
for correct &tion. Bank
I S 038EK1.02 Very Simple Bank
I 7,
I
S 040AK2.02 very simple New is it a valid assumption
lthat RCPs are still oDeratina?
U 054AK1.01 Meets WA do not believe that B is a
credible distractor. Bank
Licensee thinks that the distractor is credible.
S Still think it needs to be replaced. Chanued RB
pressure. SAT
Licensee will change initial conditions. ChaRQeC
U 058AA1.03 does not appear to have credible
distractors. (With the units separated unit two
cannot supply power to the DC bus. And the back ul:
char er not being in service is not credible. Very
Simikr to question 4 on SRQ exam. Bank
Licensee to replace question. New Question $A'
S IBEIOEA2.1 Matches WA New
4. Job COI
6.
I/E/S
II 7,
Explanation
Link
U IBE05EAI .3 matches WA Stem somewhat confusing
could lead one to believe that question has more
than one correct answer. New
Discussed wifh Licensee, wil/ change initial
conditions to allow onlv one correct answer.
U BE04EA1.lAppears to match WA. Is 220 inches the
level that the pressurizer normally decreases to aftei
a trip? Same question for pressure. If not, these ari
not credible distractors. New
Licensee asked for us to take another look at the
question, the feel like the distractors are
credible. WiIydiscuss on 41%.
S
Discussed and auestion acceDted.
U QQIAG2.4.31If rods are withdrawing on there own
this meets the WA if not we need to change the
guestion. Does a boration ever occur if the deborate
U 005AG2.4.6 Will one rod stuck at 63% give you the
conditions listed in the stem? This must be a very
reactive rod. New
S Licensee changed power level, question Sat.
U 032AA2.04 Does not meet WA there is not a loss of
SR detector. New
bicensee will rewrite question
3. Psvchometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 7.
Explanation
X U 067AK3.04 WA is for knowledge of reasons for
actions in the EOP for plant fire. There are no
reasons asked for in this question. Bank
Licensee claims that they have no actions in
EOPs that deal with a fire. Will discuss on 4/28.
Question retJlaced SAT
I s
The reason is listed in the stem. Should be in the
responses. How can 532 degrees be credible? Is
there a special reason for this temperature? New
S 069AG2.1.2 appears to match WA Bank
076AA1.04 appears to Match WA if there are no
other installed monitors that can inform the operator
that the fuel clad is leaking. Some of the distractsis
do not appear to be credible. Explanations needed.
New
Licensee will work on last two distractors.
Chanued distratctors and stern
1 I S IBE13EK1.2 Aaaears to meet the WA. Bank
iq-5
F/H) (1-5)
7.
Explanation
I
ues not appear to be credible. New
anging distractor D
Appears to meet the WA Distractor B is
not credible. (120VAC vital power to CC pumps)?
I I Licensee will replace two disfractors. Chanaed
distractors.
Changed Question added RB pressure and two
1 I S 1006K6.01 ADDearS to match WA Bank
E 007A1.03 Appears to match WA Distractor A does
nut appear to be credible, think about replacing with
a value > 303 degrees. New
Licensee will replace distractor A.
-S
Changed distractor SAT
minimum level in the CCWS surge tank, not the
normal control levels. New (does the CRB return
value ensure a minimum level?)
3.Psychometric Flaws I 4. Job Content Flaws I 5. Other
steam tables are required to answer question. Only
a knowledge of the system setpoints are required.
This question helps answer question # 29 by giving
the applicant a situation > 260 inches in the
pressurizer with the unit still on line. Bank
Licensee will replace question with # 8. §AT
distractors. §AT
U 022A3.01 Matches WA Question # 36 provides the
answer for this question. Distractors A and B do not
S appear to be credible. New
Licensee to rewrite question. Replaced SAT
U 026A2.07 Appears to match W A Distractor A is not
credible. If answer b was correct then A would be
correct also. Need to work with the distractors. New
Licensee to replace distractor(s).
Chanued ail disrtactors. SAT
..........................................................................................
E 1039G2.1.28 Appears to match WA appears to be a
S
Iseries of T/F it&tements reword stem.and
distractors. Bank
Licensee to rewrite quesfion. Fiepkced Questjoj
qz
F/H) (1-5)
3. Psychometric Flaws 1 4. Jobcontent Flaws
Link units
I 5. Other I 6. I 7.
Explanation
I I I S 064A3.07 Boes not really test load sequencing.
ISank
Oconee does not have load sequencin (no
diesels) but they do have load shed. &;ref
..................... __ Examiner gave approval for satisfying the MA.
U 073G2.1.33 ADpears !o match WA A aqd H
d:stractors may not be creoihlo. New
Licensee will to look at repiacing distractor E. A
S is sat. Accepted SAT
...............................................................
S 076A2.02 Ariooars to match WA Bank
X U 078K4.03 Does not meet WA Knowledge of the
desi n features and or interlocks which provide for
the 8llowing Securing of SAS upon loss of cooling
water. The compressor trips on High Temperature.
All this question IS askin is what is the normal
supply and backup suppgy. Needs to ask when does
Service air isolate. New
Licensee re uested to Pick B new KLA due to
7
SAS not is0 ating. Will select one. Randomly
reDIaced with 078K4.02
I I
I I 1 U 1103K3.03 Aooears to match W A Distractors Band D
not credible: hew.
I I I S b 3 A 4 . 0 2 Appears to match WA Bank
x U 026K4.06 Only artiaily meets WA. Sodium
P
Hydroxide shou d be somewhere in the question or
answer. If it was not added the scavenging would
not take place. Bank
Licensee to look at rewording question
Reworded Question SAT
I I I U 103K4.06 a ears to match WA Distractors A and E3
are not creJgie. New
NRC Po work on auestion Wrote net
U 007K1.01 appears to match WA. Several of the
distractors could be correct with the indications
given. Need to make distractors more incorrect or
change conditions in the stem. New
S Licensee to work on distractors.
Rewrote uuestion SAT.
U 005K2.03 appears to match WA distractor B is not
credible (what is the voltage on this bus)? Should
have another bus with SF in it. New
S Licensee to change distractor B.
I Chanaed uuestion SAT
3. Psvchotnetric Flaws I 4. Job Content Flaws
3I
1= SXO U/E/S
6'
7.
Emlanation
Question rewritten SAT.
029K4.03A pears to match WA. D is not a credible
distractor. Epew
Licensee to replace distractor. Re~laced
S Distractor.
S 041 K6.03 Appears to match WA Mew
1 I S 1045A2.17 amears to match WA to make D more
incorrect oumay want to add IAW ... procedure
I I I name or I h A s etc. Bank On 2003 Initial Exam
Licensee to add IA W IMAs to the stem.
4. Jab Content Raws 7.
Explanation
S 002K1.04 Appears to meet WA Distractor I3 does nc
appear tu be credible. Bank
Discussed with licensee, question is SAT.
S G2.1 .I 1 Appears to match KIA. Bank
I S lG2.1.27 Aneears to match WA. Bank
I S IG2.1.21 Appears to match WA. New
U 62.2.13 Appears tu match KIA. Distractor C does
not appear to be a credible distractor. Bank
Licensee to replace distractor C. RetJlaced all
S distractors SAT
U G 2.2.1 1 Appears to match WA. Distractors A and B
do not appear to be credible. New
Licensee to replace distractors A and B. (With
S white tags) ReDlaced A and B SAT
I S lG2.2.30 Aeeears to match WA. Bank
3. PS) met 4. Job Coi 7.
-
TIF Explanstion
Link
S lG2.3.4 Appears to match WA. New
SRO ONLY
I U
S
008AG2.2.25 Does not match WA Knowledge of
bases in technical specifications for limitin
conditions for operations and safety limitsy2.5/3.3.7)
As slated the question is asking how to appl tech
spec. Need to rework to fit in bases. Bank duestior
Licensee undersfancfs comment will continue to
work on develomnent of auesticn fhat test
Bases. 4/28 redaced auektion satisfied WA and
SRO onlv changed distractor I3 and added 1.8 gpm
to stem.
3.Psvchornetric Flaws
-
linutia Explanation
credible if Unit 3 is unable to be connected to Unit I
Distractor B to be replaced.
4/28 Distractor B reDiaced and.acf!on.s.tg
a&c.totraie to SRO level.
Sfem to be modified to include pump trip in
Licensee stated that they did not ex ect R sgt
know amkabilifv IModes) on F/S. fieed to
l8
S decide iiow to prikeed. Piof 8 direct hook u1)
attachment okav. Chanued stem to $fate that
pumD trimed. Question SAT
rI-r 3. Psychometric Flaws
,tern Cue: T/F Cred.
Oist.
I 4. Job Content Flaws
Link
t 5. Other
l/WS
I 7.
Explanation
No changes of cmmenfs. Question SAT
U BEO5EG2.2.6 This is not really a change to
procedures, but how to use procedures. It really
does not taik abut the procedure change process.
New Question.
Idi&actors C and
-
3. Psychometric Flaws I 4. Job Content Flaws I 5.Other 7.
'WS Explanation
Licensee made comment that this was a difficult
KLA to w r k an SRO question to. Discussed
changing some of the conditions in the stem to
allow the SRO to make a determination of what
all ICs hand and auto liqhts extinguish.
Question SAT
distractor More
SRO only topics.
Licensee wiEI work on changing diStraCtQrS.
estion on. Question
ometric Flaws I 4. Jab Content Flaws i 5 . Other I 6. I 7.
Explanation
I I l l I S 003A2.01 WA appears to match. SRO only OK
Modified
Licensee to re lace Question. Question
S ffenlaced. SA P
I ill I S 078G2.4.49 KIA appears to match. New
No Comments
S 064A2.16 Appears to meet the WA.(sorne difficulty
totally with the B part) otherwise okay. New
X'ing
o Comments
I I Ix/ I U 071A2.02 meets the b portion of the WA but is not
SRO onlv These are merator actions. Listed in
I I l l I. S
stern. Binink
Licensee and NffC to think about question and il
- _-
it can &e salvaged Question accented with no
I
7.
.OK
WH)
I LOD
(1-5) I/WS
§'
I
Explanation
Licensee wiN change question. Replaced
Question
G2.1.33Ap ears to match WA Very simple. Not
SROOnly ew R
Licensee wili add parameter and reason to
choices. Added bash to distractors. Question
write new question.
Licensee to write new question. Question kept a:
I
3.Psvchometric Flau 7.
IIWS Explanation
6'
I I
from memory. With attachment this would be a 1.
Much discussion about allowing attachment for
reference. If Licensee will not remove
i3fti3ChmeRt, suggest selecting new U A and
replacing que&&. Continue-to look at Georae
to decide.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1
Quality Checklist
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training
Printed Name i Signature Date
,
a. Grader Ronald F. Aiello -07/01/04-
b. Facility Reviewer(*) NIA -NIA-
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) George T. Hoppe -07/01/04-
d. NRC Supervisor (") Michael E. Ernstes 7/,/Qv
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not appllcable for examinations graded by the
6of5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1
Quality Checklist
2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and
to ensure that grades
a. Grader Ronald F. Aiello
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) George T. Hopper
d. NRC Supervisor (*) Michael E. Ernstes
5of5 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
..... .......... .......... .........
ES..50! Post.ExaminationCheck .Sheet ............ Form ES-501-1
II II
Task Description
Complete
I I. Facility written exam comments or graded exams received and
verified comolete /I
ents reviewed and incorporated and
3. Operating tests graded by NRC examiners
4. NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test
grading completed
....
Management (lice
..... ......
.....
0. Faciiity notified of results
....
9. Examirlation report issued (refe
.......- .........
21 of 23 NUREG-402f. Draft Revision 9
Duke Energy
Oconer Nuclear Station
7600 Rochester Highway
Seneca, S C 29672
(867) 88S-.ZOOO 0PP:CE
April 28, 2004
NRC REGION II
SAM NUNN ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET, S.W.
SUITE 23T85
ATLANTA, GA. 30303-8932
Re: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION
Completed Operating Exam
Dear Mr. Ernstes:
We are enclosing the Completed Operating Exam and applicable quality checklists, as
required, for the Initial License exam scheduled for the weeks of June 14 and June 22,
2004, at the Operator Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Site. Enclosed for your review
are:
0 Four Scenarios
One RQ Administrative Exam
One SRO Administrative Exam
One RO Control Roomlln-Plant Test
One SRQ (I) Control Room/ln-Plant Test
One SRO (U) Control Roomlln-Plant Test
e Form ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist
If you require any additional information, or have further questions, please feel free to
contact Gabriel Washburn at (864) 885-4490, or J.R. Steely at (864) 885-3446.
Neil E. Constance Ji.,
Manager of Operator Training