IR 05000373/2009007
Download: ML093451499
Text
December 11, 2009
Mr. Charles Senior Vice President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT: LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION (PI&R) INSPECTION 05000373/2009007; 05000374/2009007
Dear Mr. Pardee:
On November 23, 2009, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection at the LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on November 23, 2009, with members of your staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. The inspection concluded that your staff was effective at identifying problems and incorporating them into the corrective action program. In general, issues were appropriately prioritized, evaluated, and corrected, audits and self-assessments were thorough and probing, and operating experience was appropriately screened and disseminated. Your staff was aware of the importance of having a strong safety-conscious work environment and expressed a willingness to raise safety issues. No findings or violations were identified during this inspection. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC=s document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,/RA/
Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-373; 50-374 License No. NPF-11; NPF-18
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000373/2009007; 05000374/2009007
w/Attachment:
Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ Enclosure U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III Docket Nos: 05000373; 05000374 License Nos: NPF-11; NPF-18 Report No: 05000373/2009007; 05000374/2009007 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 Location: Marseilles, IL Dates: November 2-20, 2009 Inspectors: N. Shah, Project Engineer - Team Lead F. Ramirez, Resident Inspector - LaSalle C. Scott, Reactor Engineer D. Swarzc, Reactor Engineer Observers: Jane Yesinowki, Illinois Emergency Management Agency
Approved by: Kenneth Riemer, Chief Branch 2 Enclosure
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
...........................................................................................................1
REPORT DETAILS
.......................................................................................................................3
OTHER ACTIVITIES
......................................................................................................3
4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution
..................................................3
4OA6 Management Meetings.......................................................................................
.9
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
.....................................................................................................1
LIST OF ITEMS
OPENED, CLOSED AND DISCUSSED.........................................................1
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
.........................................................................................2
LIST OF ACRONYMS
- US [[]]
ED..................................................................................................19
Enclosure
- OF [[]]
- FINDIN [[]]
- GS [[]]
- IR [[05000373/2009007; 05000374/2009007 (November 2, 2009 - November 20, 2009), LaSalle County Station Units 1 and 2; Biennial Baseline Inspection of the Identification and Resolution of Problems. This team inspection was performed by three regional inspectors and the site resident inspector. No findings or violations were identified. Identification and Resolution of Problems Overall, the corrective action program (]]
CAP) was being effectively implemented. Issues were identified at a low threshold, evaluated and corrected. Self-assessments and audits by Nuclear Oversight (NOS) were thorough and critical of the assessed areas. Operating experience was recognized as valuable and was effectively communicated. Interviews with
licensee staff and a review of the Employee Concerns Program (ECP) indicated that the
licensee had a positive safety culture environment that encouraged identification of issues in the CAP. However, the inspectors identified several areas of concern that may negatively impact the licensee's ability to identify and resolve issues. In some cases, these issues had been
recognized by the licensee, but effective corrective action had not been taken. Briefly, the
issues were: The current
- CAP performance indicators were not always effectively used or sufficient to monitor the program. Although the licensee was aware of these issues,
CAP staff appeared willing to live with the shortcomings and had not formally taken corrective action. There were some examples of long-standing issues that were either not corrected or not evaluated. In some cases, the licensee had identified the issues, but had not evaluated why previous corrective actions were ineffective. There were several examples where the review of operating experience (OE) in cause evaluations were not documented in accordance with licensee procedures. Additionally, there was no formal requirement to evaluate whether the failure to use OE was a precursor during the evaluation of events. Although the licensee had identified these
issues in the
ECP, but not captured in a formal case file, were not always well documented. This resulted in some uncertainty regarding whether potentially significant issues were appropriately dispositioned.
Enclosure
- A. [[]]
NRC-Identified and Self-Revealed Findings Cornerstone: Mitigating Systems None. B. Licensee-Identified Violations No violations of significance were identified.
Enclosure
- REPORT [[]]
- OTHER [[]]
- 4OA 2 Problem Identification and Resolution (71152B) The activities documented in Sections .1 through .4 constituted one biennial sample of Problem Identification and Resolution (
PI&R) as defined in Inspection Procedure
(IP) 71152. .1 Assessment of the Corrective Action Program Effectiveness a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective action program (CAP) implementing procedures and attended
NRC PI&R inspection in November 2007. The selection of issues ensured
an adequate review of issues across the
NRC generic communications, department self-assessments, licensee audits, operating experience reports, and NRC documented findings as part of
this assessment. The inspectors also reviewed a selection of completed root, apparent
and common cause evaluations. The inspectors performed a more extensive review of the licensee's control of cabling located in underground vaults, and corrective actions and temporary modifications that had been open for greater than one year. The review of the cabling located inside
underground vaults consisted of a five year search of related issues identified in the CAP
and discussions with appropriate licensee staff to assess the licensee's efforts in
addressing identified concerns. During the reviews, the inspectors evaluated whether the licensee staff's actions were in compliance with the facility's
CFR Part 50, Appendix B requirements. Specifically, the inspectors evaluated if licensee personnel were identifying plant issues
at the proper threshold, if these issues were entered into the CAP in a timely manner,
and if these issues were appropriately resolved. The inspectors also evaluated whether
root, apparent, and common cause evaluations were assigned and performed as appropriate. The inspectors also evaluated the timeliness and effectiveness of corrective actions for selected issue reports, completed investigations, and
- CAP program was effectively implemented in that issues were identified at a low threshold, evaluated and corrected. Workers were encouraged to identify issues and were familiar with the various avenues available (NRC,
CAP, etc.). This was
evident by the large number of CAP items generated annually, which were reasonably
Enclosure distributed across the various departments. A shared computerized database was used for creating individual reports and for subsequent management of the processes of issue
evaluation and response. This included determining the issue's significance, addressing such matters as regulatory compliance and reporting, and assigning any actions deemed necessary or appropriate. However, the inspectors noted that the licensee performance indicators for monitoring the CAP program were not being effectively utilized. The inspectors identified that there
was no requirement to investigate instances where indicators identified poor
performance. For example, the inspectors noted that no Action Requests (ARs) had been initiated for several indicators that were either in the yellow or red band (indicating poor performance) during the past year. During interviews, licensee CAP staff
commented that some of these indicators, because of how they were defined, may be
inaccurately reporting performance. However, the inspectors could not find any CAP
entries identifying these indicators so that they could be corrected. The inspectors questioned the efficacy of the indicators when no effort was made to evaluate instances when poor performance was identified or to revise those considered inaccurate. The
licensee issued
- AR 993280 to evaluate this issue. The inspectors determined that the station was generally effective at trending low level issues to prevent larger issues from developing. The licensee also used the
CAP to document instances where previous corrective actions were ineffective or were inappropriately closed. Findings No findings of significance were identified. (2) Effectiveness of Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues The inspectors concluded that the station was generally effective at prioritizing and evaluating issues commensurate with the safety significance of the identified problem. The inspectors determined that CAP screening meetings were generally thorough and
maintained a high standard for approving actions.
The majority of issues were of low level and were either closed to trend or at a level appropriate for a condition evaluation. Some of these issues were closed to a work request or to another CAP report, but the inspectors noted that both the parent and
daughter documents had the necessary verbiage to document the interrelationship.
The inspectors also had no concerns with those assigned an apparent, root or common
cause evaluation. There were no items in the operations, engineering, or maintenance
backlogs that were risk significant, individually or collectively. Root, apparent and common cause evaluations were generally thorough; however, the inspectors did identify two examples where the level of review was less than appropriate: AR 882701882701was written to perform a common cause evaluation for an adverse trend regarding issues with work orders/packages. The evaluation identified that this issue had been recurring since 2003, but did not address why previous
corrective actions were ineffective.
Enclosure
NRC resident inspectors had observed a high radiation barrier (fenced enclosure) that had been built adjacent to the Unit 1 safety-related Standby Gas Treatment System piping. The barrier was in contact
with the piping (potentially raising a concern regarding the seismic analysis), but
there was no licensee evaluation supporting this condition. Subsequently, the barrier was removed, but there was no documentation for its removal. The licensee captured the above issues in the
AR Nos. 996319 and 995883.
The inspectors determined that the licensee was generally effective at evaluating equipment functionality requirements after a degraded or non-conforming issue was
identified. The inspectors reviewed Maintenance Rule action plans associated with
systems currently in (a)(1) and for those returning to a(2) status within the last two years. No issues were identified from this review.
The inspectors also concluded that the licensee had been effectively managing
underground cabling.
Findings
No findings of significance were identified.
(3) Effectiveness of Corrective Actions The inspectors concluded that corrective actions for identified deficiencies were generally timely and adequately implemented, commensurate with their safety significance. The inspectors also concluded that sampled corrective actions
assignments for selected
- NRC documented violations were generally effective and timely. However the inspectors did notice some untimely corrective actions as described below.
- NRC identified a non-safety hanger attached to a safety related cable tray. In the evaluation, the licensee failed to note that the same issue had been previously identified about four years earlier (
AR 352075352075 and that corrective actions had not been taken. The inspectors noted that the licensee had not taken appropriate action to address potential preconditioning due to inappropriate work scheduling (for example, scheduling a post-maintenance test just prior to a surveillance test)
despite having two prior NRC-identified instances of such, associated with the
main steam isolation valves and reactor core isolation cooling systems.
- AR 856961 was written to address oscillations observed on a Unit 1 control rod drive flow control valve. Although a work order was written to address this, it remained open for over two years. The inspectors did not identify any
- AR 736409 was written to address high dose rates associated with a radioactive waste sample sink. The
AR was closed to a work order, but there was no documentation that the work was actually performed.
Enclosure The inspectors noted that work orders associated with the removal of temporary modifications, did not contain the necessary cross-referencing as required by procedure (i.e., neither the work order nor the temporary modification paperwork
referenced the other). The licensee wrote ARs 989540, 995336, 995957 and 988746, respectively, to address the above issues. The inspectors also identified that numerous, recurring issues (since 2006) with the Units 1 and 2 gaseous and particulate radiation monitors used for reactor leak detection
had not been resolved. The issues were varied and potentially affected the reliability of
the monitors. Although these monitors were nonsafety-related, they were required by
Technical Specifications. The licensee had performed past cause evaluations that had recommended corrective actions, but these actions had not been implemented. Additionally, the licensee had not evaluated whether the issues significantly impacted the ability of the monitors to detect primary system leakage. The licensee subsequently
identified that the monitors would perform the Technical Specification function and wrote
AR 989527989527to address this issue. The licensee had 19 open corrective actions that were greater than one year old, with the oldest being 731 days old. The inspectors verified that the open actions were
appropriate, that work orders were in place (and scheduled) for final implementation of
the action, and that plant operation or risk was not adversely affected.
Findings
No findings of significance were identified. .2 Assessment of the Use of Operating Experience a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed the licensee's implementation of the facility's
OE program procedures, observed daily station and pre-job briefings to observe the use of OE information, and selectively
reviewed completed evaluations of OE issues and events. The intent of the review was
to determine whether the licensee was effectively integrating OE experience into the
performance of daily activities, whether evaluations of issues were proper and conducted by qualified personnel, whether the licensee's program was sufficient to prevent future occurrences of previous industry events, and whether the licensee
effectively used the information in developing departmental assessments and facility audits. The inspectors also assessed if corrective actions, as a result of OE experience,
were identified and effectively implemented. b. Assessment The inspectors concluded that the station appropriately screened OE information for applicability, and used the information for corrective and preventative actions to identify
and prevent similar issues. The inspectors observed that OE was discussed as part of
the daily station and pre-job briefings and was effectively disseminated across the
Enclosure various plant departments. During interviews with the inspectors, licensee staff generally commented favorably on the use of
OE was considered as part of root, apparent and common cause evaluations, the inspectors identified that these reviews were not always documented in accordance with CAP procedures. The licensee had identified several examples during
self-assessments conducted in 2008 and 2009 and had taken corrective action.
A subsequent licensee review, conducted prior to the
- NRC [[]]
PI&R inspection, had
identified no additional issues. However, the inspectors identified several examples
where OE potentially applicable to the station was either not reviewed or the review was not documented as required. These examples occurred after the licensee self-assessments were completed, and were not identified in the licensee's effectiveness
review. The licensee initiated
- AR 995934 to evaluate this issue. The inspectors also noted that the licensee's staff was not required to evaluate whether the failure to use
OE was a contributing cause of an event. Instead, the staff was only required to identify OE related to an event and use any insights gained in developing the corrective actions. The inspectors noted that several of the licensee's root, apparent
and common cause evaluations had identified OE that may have prevented the event
had it been appropriately evaluated. The licensee initiated AR 995981995981to evaluate this
issue. Findings No findings of significance were identified. .3 Assessment of Self-Assessments and Audits a. Inspection Scope The inspectors reviewed selected focused area self-assessments, check-in self-assessments, root cause effectiveness reviews, and NOS audits. The inspectors evaluated whether these audits and self-assessments were being effectively managed, adequately covered the subject areas, and whether identified issues were appropriately
captured in the CAP. In addition, the inspectors also interviewed licensee personnel
regarding the implementation of the audit and self-assessment programs. b. Assessment The inspectors concluded that self-assessments and audits were typically accurate, thorough, and effective at identifying issues and enhancement opportunities at an
appropriate threshold level. The inspectors concluded that these audits and
self-assessments were completed by personnel knowledgeable in the subject area. The inspectors considered the quality of the NOS audits to be thorough and critical.
The self-assessments were acceptable but, as expected, they were not at the same level of quality as the audits. The inspectors observed that
NOS audits and self-assessments. Findings No findings of significance were identified.
Enclosure .4 Assessment of Safety-Conscious Work Environment (SCWE) a. Inspection Scope The inspectors interviewed selected members of the licensee's staff to determine if there were any impediments of a
- ECP activities to identify any emergent issues or potential trends. In addition, the inspectors reviewed the facility's
- ECP coordinators, and reviewed licensee safety culture surveys. The licensee's programs to publicize the
- ECP programs were also reviewed. b. Assessment The inspectors determined that the plant staff were aware of the importance of having a strong
- SC [[]]
WE and expressed a willingness to raise safety issues. No one interviewed had experienced retaliation for safety issues raised, or knew of anyone who had failed to
raise issues. All persons interviewed had an adequate knowledge of the
ECP process. These results were similar to the findings of the licensee's safety culture surveys. Based on these interviews, the inspectors concluded that there was no
evidence of an unacceptable
- ECP to identify concerns. However, during the interviews most station personnel did not know where the
ECP office was located, although they could
identify the ECP personnel. This did not appear to have a detrimental affect, based on
the number of
ECP issues not captured in a formal case file, were not always well documented. This resulted in some uncertainty regarding whether potentially significant issues were appropriately dispositioned. For example, there was one issue regarding a plant individual who exhibited signs of aberrant behavior while on
shift. Although this concern was documented by the ECP staff, a formal case record
was not opened. The inspectors could find no record of whether this concern was
reviewed by the security staff as required by the site Security plan. Subsequently, the inspectors verified that this had occurred; however, the lack of a written record made it somewhat difficult to confirm. The ECP staff acknowledged this issue and was
developing corrective actions. However, due to the potential to release confidential
information, this observation was not captured in the CAP. Findings No findings of significance were identified.
Enclosure
- 4OA [[6 Management Meetings .1 Exit Meeting Summary On November 23, 2009, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Wozniak and other members of the licensee staff. The licensee acknowledged the issues presented. The inspectors confirmed that none of the potential report input discussed was considered proprietary.]]
- SUPPLE [[]]
- MENTAL [[]]
- INFORM [[]]
- SUPPLE [[]]
- MENTAL [[]]
- INFORM [[]]
- ATION [[]]
- KEY [[]]
- POINTS [[]]
- OF [[]]
CONTACT Licensee J. Bashor, Engineering Director L. Blunk, Operations Training Manager
A. Byers, Performance Improvement Specialist
K. Ihnen, Nuclear Oversight Manager
B. Rash, Maintenance Director
T. Simpkin, Regulatory Assurance Manager K. Taber, Operations Director J. Vergara, Senior Regulatory Specialist
- D. Wozniak, Site Vice President Nuclear Regulatory Commission K. Riemer, Chief, Branch 2, Division of Reactor Projects
- LIST [[]]
- OF [[]]
- ITEMS [[]]
- CLOSED [[]]
- AND [[]]
DISCUSSED Opened and Closed None.
Attachment
- LIST [[]]
- OF [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- ED The following is a list of documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion on this list does not imply that the
- NRC inspectors reviewed the documents in their entirety, but rather, that selected sections of portions of the documents were evaluated as part of the overall inspection effort. Inclusion of a document on this list does not imply
NRC acceptance of the document or
any part of it, unless this is stated in the body of the inspection report.
- PLANT [[]]
AA-125-1003 Apparent Cause Evaluation Manual Revision 8
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- ED "Number Description or Title Date or Revision 871625 [[SSC" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. [Foreign Material] Accumulated Debris on Reactor Jet Pump 15 1/25/2009 732084 1A]]
- DG [[[Diesel Generator] Room Vent Supply Filter High D/P 2/5/2008 727393 Unit 1 Control Rod 18-39 Inoperable 1/27/2008 727361 Unit 1 Control Rod 18-23 Inoperable 1/26/2008 721332 Unit 1]]
- RR [[[Reactor Recirculation] Flow Change 1/11/2008]]
- 970547 NOS [[[Nuclear Oversight] Identifies]]
- PI&R [[]]
- FASA [[[Focused Area Self-Assessment] Plan and Report Issues 9/25/2009 954832]]
- NOS [[]]
- ID [[:]]
- IR 891204 Incorrectly Closed to One Another 3/29/2009 680941 Off Scale Control Room Reading 10/6/2007 710857 Worker Alarmed
- 6 MREM Emergent Dose was Received 12/10/2007 710836 Security-Weapons Cabinet at India Needs Anchored 12/12/2007 711281
- TSI [[]]
- OK [[]]
- 2 HWC [[[Hydrogen Water Chemistry] System Trip Due to High Hydrogen Pressure 1/12/2008 721319 Received Unexpected Unit 1]]
CRD [Control Rod Drive] HCU [Hydraulic Control Unit] Alarm for
Rod 42-51 1/12/2008 720249 Unexpected U1
- CRD Accumulator 54-23 Alarm 1/10/2008 872502 Shaw-Pipefitter Received Dose Rate Alarm in Drywell 1/26/2009 953952 Security-Vehicle Discovered Operable Without Key 8/16/2009 933571 Security Explosive Detector #1 and #2 Not Working Properly 6/21/2009 876268 Security-Live Round of Ammunition Declared at Check Point 2/4/2009 678960 Through Fault on L0104 Line Between Braidwood and LaSalle 9/15/2009 881434
TLD Ran Through X-Ray 2/17/2009 914174 NOS Finding in Corrective Action Effectiveness 4/30/2009
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- 914632 NOS [[]]
- ID [[:]]
- RCR [[[Root Cause Report] Checklist Answered Improperly 5/1/2009 913283]]
- NOS [[]]
- NOS [[]]
- ID [[:]]
- CAP Investigations Do Not Meet Some Admin Requirements 4/30/2009 848279: assignment 30 Address Issues Raised During
- 840401 NRC Identified Inspection Findings in Aux Building Ceiling 11/04/2008 352075 Mass Spectrometer Duct Attachment to Cable Tray Support 7/1/2005 344802 Design Changes Required Due to Re-Location of Equipment 6/15/2005 849004
CSCS [Component System Cooling Water] Valve
Replacements 12/6/2007
- 709749 NCV [[[Non-Cited Violation] Associated with Diesel Fuel Storage Not Fully Addressed 12/10/2007 703553]]
- 699299 NRC [[]]
- JP [[[Jet Pump]]]
- RB [[[Riser Brace] Delays 12/6/2007 729732]]
ACE 839916 Security Negligent Weapon Discharge 7/30/2009
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
RHR [Residual Heat Removal]
Pump Room 2/4/2007
- ED [[[Electronic Dosimeter] Prior to Exceeding]]
- ACE [[]]
- CA [[[Contaminated Area] 4/15/2009]]
- HIC [[[high integrity container] During Loading 11/8/2007]]
- CCA Rolled Into Root Cause Following Management Challenge (Modifications Not Fully Incorporated due to Lack of Clear Standards) 11/8/2007
- RCE [[]]
- RR [[[Reactor Recirculation] Ganged Controller Malfunction 5/27/2009]]
- HD [[[Heater Drain] Bearing Failure 4/4/2009 927524]]
- 940703 LAS [[]]
- CCE 901038 Online Dose Estimating Accuracy Needs Improvement 4/1/2009 899020 Declining Reliability of Radiation Monitors Across Fleet 3/28/2009 936524 System
IQ Assessment Report 6/29/2009 898613 Operations Identified Adverse Trend 1(2)PL15J and 1(2)PL75J 3/27/2009
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- NOS [[]]
- NOS [[]]
- ID [[]]
- FPR [[[Fire Protection Report] Descriptions, Drawings, and Pre-Fire Plan Issues 11/28/2007 692354 U2]]
- SFP [[[Spent Fuel Pool] Boraflex Panel Degradation Projections through 7/1/08 10/31/2007 880430 L2R12 Shaw Performance Common Cause Analysis (]]
- 798029 NOS [[]]
- CW [[[Circulating Water] Pump Failure to Start, Then Overcurrent Conditions 3/13/2009 859439 L2R12 Late Work Order Generated from]]
- 856855 EP [[]]
- FASA 843943-Deficiency in Augmentation Drills Time/Day 12/16/2008 759725 Break In Lake Make Up Line Following System Pump Start 04/05/2008 799885 Perform Root Cause On Unit
- INPO [[]]
- OJT /TPE As Team Identified Finding 03/28/2008 916375 Technician Performed Task Without Qualification 05/06/2009 889582 Adverse Trend In
- WO Revision 02/16/2008 738459 Generator Seal Oil Ingress 02/19/2008 836359 Leak Work Off Curve Is Off Track 10/27/2008 852498
- NOS [[]]
- ID [[: Corrective Actions For Transient Combustible Issues 12/04/2008 874657 Shaw - Sea Van Slides Off Of Truck Backing Into Refuel Pad 02/01/2009 878589 Coordination Issue Between Turbine Roll and Switching 02/10/2009 911322 Vibration Analysis Identifies Wiped Bearing(s) On 0]]
SME Review of OE25373 08/28/2007
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
WS-201, Unit 2 Service Water Effluent Monitor
Calibration. 05/05/09 RCA 799885-03 Motor Driven Reactor Feed Pump Work Window Scope Expansion due to Less than Optimal Pump
Internal Component Design Specifications 07/20/2007
- ACE [[]]
- ACE 878589-04 During Initial Turbine Roll Prior to Synchronization the Unit2 Turbine Tripped on Generator Lockout. 02/09/2009
ACE 852498-06 Inability to Arrest the Adverse Trend in the Transient Combustible Control 01/11/2009 ACE 737285 Condensate Booster System Line Incorrectly Identified and Removed 02/16/2008 492926 Assignment 2 Perform a Common Cause Analysis on Rod 26-35 double notch on withdraw. Validate latest revision
of
ASA-125-1002 for CCA format. 9/1/2006 496876 Control Room Indication Bands Differ 6/5/2006
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
ED Number Description or Title Date or Revision 496876 Assignment 2 Operations Services to Evaluate Referenced Indicators and Document Appropriate Bands for
Incorporation in
- T& [[]]
RM with Assistance from
Engineering as Required 9/21/2006 716812 Assignment 4 For Finding 2, verify all actions are complete and appropriate to prevent a future finding (IR 663732) 3/19/2008 764450 Assignment 2 Perform Common Cause Analysis on Reactivity management Performance Indicator Adverse
Trend. Validate latest revision of
AA-125-1002
for
- SIM [[Critiques 10/8/2007 681731 Possibility of New Fuel Failure on LaSalle Unit 1 10/8/2007 681885 Domestic Water Underground Valve Operator Box Full of Debris 10/9/2007 682781 1B Diesel Generator Load/Speed Drifts 10/10/2007 682796 1B Diesel Generator Voltage Regulator Adjustment Erratic 10/10/2007 683328 A]]
- RHR [[]]
- 698423 ERO Exam Security Issue During Annual Requal training 11/13/2007 707328 Check-in Opex 12/4/2007 716812
- NRC Inspection Report 2007-004 - Green Findings and One Asso (NCV) 12/31/2007 727361 Unit 1 Control Rod 18-23 Inoperable 1/27/2008
- RSLLV 2 Full Open 2/28/2008 744606 Fluctuations Observed in Instantaneous Reactor Power 3/4/2008 748777
NOS ID: Porc Issues 3/12/2008
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- MSIV Preconditioning 4/4/2008 764450 Reactivity Management Performance Indicator Adverse Trend 4/17/2008
- SBGT Line Contact with Scaffold 6/9/2008 786762 U2 in Drywell Inlet Pressure Low Alarm 6/16/2008 795700 Roof Runoff Water Pooling on Top of
- TSC [[]]
- PP 9/26/2008 823530 Exceeded Thermal Limit During L1M18 Shutdown 9/28/2008 827452 Perform Root Cause Investigation for L1C12 Fuel Failures 10/7/2008 828198
- NOS [[]]
- 848993 NRC Potential Finding; Transient Combustibles 11/24/2008 855280 Transient Combustible Compliance Issues 12/11/2008 855678 Ice Buildup on Top of the
- CRD [[]]
- RR [[]]
FCV Drifting While Locked-Up and Pumps Off 1/9/2009
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- ED Number Description or Title Date or Revision 865886 Div 2 Visual Annunciator Power Supply Failure 1/13/2009
- OB [[]]
- ISI Documentation 3/26/2009 900378 Hi-Rad Area around cask well drain needs to be disassembled and removed 3/31/2009 902423 Operator Work Around Board Meeting Results 4/3/2009 910096
- RR [[]]
- HU Performance 5/27/2009 925331 Adverse Trend in Even Free Clock Resets at LaSalle 5/29/2009 926304 Color Banding between Units does not Match 6/1/2009 926589 1B
- CCA on LaSalle Configuration Control Events 6/12/2009 934253 Observed Increase in U1 Offgas Pre-Treat Activities 6/23/2009
- 993280 NRC [[]]
- 995883 NRC [[]]
- ID [[:]]
- WO Not found for High Radiation Barrier Removal 11/19/2009 995957 Contingency Package Left Open for Extended Period 11/19/2009 683820
RHR Seal Cooler Has a Low Flow Rate of 10.2 GPM 10/30/2007
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- ED Number Description or Title Date or Revision 692247 Conflicting Procedures Need Revision 10/31/2009 702329 Wrong Transducer Used for Test Results in Bad Data 11/21/2007
- DG Oil Cooler Outlet Temp Gauge 1E22-R531 Reads Low 12/12/2007 711140 System Trending Identifies Margin Issue 12/13/2007 714115 Revise Procedures
- ER -AA-340-2000 as Written 2/16/2008 770555 Hydrogen Found in Bearing 10 Casing 5/1/2008 791008 1E12-F042B Examine
- EH&S Audit 2008 Findings and Recommendations 12/4/2008 864964 Extent of Condition Review for Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool 1/9/2009 888535 Calibrate 2
- MOV Motor for 2E12-F024B in L2R13 8/20/2009 968594 Active Oil Seepage from Thrust Bearing Oil Return Box Cover 9/22/2009 986109
- RR [[]]
- RR [[]]
CAPR Unable to be Complied with, Needs Revision 11/03/2009
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- ACE [[]]
- 737220 IVVI (In-Vessel Visual Inspection) Examinations Performed with Expired Visual Acuity 2/7/2008
- ACE 737253 System Engineering Failed to Use Empirical Data When Determining Tube-Plugging Limits 2/16/2008
- RCR 742287 Failure of Turbine Speed Detection System While Synching the Generator to the Grid 4/28/2008
RCR 881009 Electro-Hydraulic Control (EHC) System Hydraulic Transmitter Fault Setting Incorrect Due to
Ineffective Review of Software File Changes 2/5/2009
- RCR 923335 Untimely Recognition that No Steam Packing Exhauster Blower was Running 7/2/2009 886819 2C
- MCR Unexpected Alarm 2/28/2009 824848 Rod 34-31 Withdraw Speed is Too Fast 10/1/2008 683288 Thermography Identifies Minor Hotspot in 1W
- DG Air Start Solenoid Valve Never Installed 10/24/2007 696350 Bolted Bus Connections May Need Replacement 11/08/2007 699827 Emergent Work Impacts Work Planning Daily Planning 11/15/2007 709276
VR026 Loop May be OOT 12/19/2007
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
- ED Number Description or Title Date or Revision 713225 Potential Thread Engagement Issue on 2B D/G Emergency Stop 12/18/2007 723586 Unknown High Conductivity Input in
- NOS [[]]
- 0PL 31J High Rad Area is Contaminated 2/14/2008 740511 Apparent Seat Leakage by 1E12-F064B 2/25/2008 741586 No
- EPN [[]]
- SPL Valve Isolation Valve Doesn't Isolate 2/27/2008 754492 Nesting on B Radwaste Crane Intermittent Issues 3/25/2008
- 2VD 05C Tripped 6/11/2008 861648 Temporary Catch Basin Used As A Permanent Solution 12/31/2008 863162
- RCIC Turbine Oil 1/30/2009 934253 Observed Increase in U1 Offgas Pre-Treat Activities 6/23/2009 934958 A Train
- CRE is Greater Than Allowed 6/24/2009 964856 Inaccurate Does Estimation on Work Task 9/14/2009 965049
- NOD [[]]
LS-AA-106, Plant Operations Review Committee
(PORC) 4/30/2008
RPV Head Lift Stopped Due to High Indicated Weight 2/26/2009 ACE 890180 New Disc Installed in 2B21-F032A With Potential Weight Difference 4/16/2009
Attachment
- CORREC [[]]
- TIVE [[]]
- ACTION [[]]
- DOCUME [[]]
- NTS [[]]
- REVIEW [[]]
FME (Foreign
Material Exclusion) Concerns From Dive Activity
in the Service Water Tunnel 5/05/2009
- EXPERI [[]]
- 578711 MOV [[]]
- OPEX [[]]
- IN 2007-29 Operability Effects of Temp Scaffolding 10/02/2007 684958 Fleet Review of Operating Experience Report 24759 10/15/2007 719685
- NER [[]]
- NER [[]]
- 737688 NER [[]]
OE07-001 Operability Evaluation, Reactor Vessel Jet Pump 19 Instrumentation Line (IR 581231) Revision 2 OE07-002 Operability Evaluation, Emergency Diesel Generators, Diesel Fuel Storage Tanks, Diesel Fuel Day Tanks: Use of Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel
will Require Increased Fuel Storage Volume
(IR 612524) Revision 5
Attachment
- OPERAT [[]]
- ING [[]]
- EXPERI [[]]
VE04CB, Refrigerant Compressor subject to internal damage due to
liquid refrigerant slugging during startup Revision
- 5 OEE 08-02 Operability Evaluation, Unit 1 and 2 Diesel Generators Air Inlet Temperature Rating Issues (
- ASSESS [[]]
- MENTS [[]]
- AND [[]]
- LAS -09-06 LaSalle Radiation Protection Program (AR 862840862840 Revision 0 848279-03 Preparation for
- NRC [[]]
- SOER [[[Significant Operational Event Report] 01-1 Implementation Assessment 878991-02 Employee Concerns Program Check-In Assessment 10/2009 917330-02 Safety Culture Monitoring 6/5/09 Executive Review of Exelon Nuclear's Learning Programs August 2009 707328-04 Operating Experience Results Measurement Review 08/27/09 707328-04 Operating Experience Check-In Assessment 12/17/08 713021 Maintenance Functional Area Audit 2/6/2008 848238 Maintenance Rigging and Lifting Program Check-In Assessment 3/31/2009 912557-01 Mechanical Maintenance Document of Work Issues Check-In Assessment 12/15/2009 912590-01 Check-In Assessment to Review Documentation of Work Issues 12/29/09 908683-01 Low Level Performance Issues in]]
- 2007 AFI [[]]
CM.4-2 Fuel Failures Check-In Self-Assessment Report (861374) Performance Gap Resolution in L2R12 outage 12/30/2008
Attachment
- AND [[]]
- ACE 919624 Three Reactor Operators Fail to take Mode Switch to Shutdown during a Training Scenario 5/14/2009
CCA 919000-02 Level 5 Reactivity Management Issue Trends 6/4/2009 CCA 924545-02 Common Cause Analysis : Data Review of Items that Contain a Human Performance Element in
LaSalle Chemistry in 2009 6/18/2009
- CCA 925331-02 Common Cause Analysis: Adverse Trend in LaSalle Event Free Clock Resets 1/1/- 6/1/2009
- RCE 923160 Root Cause Investigation: Ground Across the Unit 1 West Main Power Transformer Surger (Lightning) Arrester resulting in a Scram 7/8/2009 707328
- CONDIT [[]]
- ION [[]]
- DURING [[]]
- 996319 NRC [[]]
- NRC [[]]
- ID [[:]]
- WO [[[Work Order] Not Found for High Radiation Barrier Removal 11/19/2009]]
- 996372 NRC [[]]
ID: WO 605660 Closed with No Work Performed 11/20/2009
Attachment
- CONDIT [[]]
- ION [[]]
- DURING [[]]
- INSPEC TION Number Description or Title Date or Revision 995957 Contingency Package Left Open for Extended Period 11/18/2009
- 989540 NRC [[]]
- 989527 NRC [[]]
- 988746 NRC [[]]
- ID [[:]]
- AA -112 Note Not Included in T-MOD Work Packages 11/4/2009 995934 Documentation Issues With Regard to
- SOC Package 11/13/2009 Summary of Open Work Arounds and Challenges 11/2007 - 11/2009 Work Orders Number Description or Title Date or Revision
- OTBD [[]]
- RR [[]]
- WO 844595 Fleet Work Package Documentation Continuation 806424 11/13/2008 Temporary and/or Permanent Plant Modifications Number Description or Title Date or Revision
CV2 and CV4 Revision 0
Attachment Temporary and/or Permanent Plant Modifications Number Description or Title Date or Revision EC 367757 Hook Up Instrumentation to Gather Data to See if an Offset is a More Viable Option for Main
Turbine Back Pressure Indicators 1/10/2008
- EC 369498 Replace Double Block Drain Valves 1B21-F032A/B/C & 1B21-F303A/B/C With Equivalent Two (2) Single Valve Assemblies in Series Using Drawing
DWFDS Flow Tube Modification Revision 1
Attachment
- LIST [[]]
- OF [[]]
- ACRONY [[]]
- MS [[]]
- USED [[]]
CFR Code of Federal Regulations DRP Division of Reactor Projects
ECP Employee Concerns Program
IN Information Notices
NCV Non-Cited Violation NOS Nuclear Oversight
NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- SC [[]]
WE Safety-Conscious Work Environment
WO Work Order
C. Pardee -2-
In accordance with
- NRC 's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the
NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Kenneth Riemer, Chief
Branch 2
Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-373; 50-374
License No.
Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000373/2009007; 05000374/2009007 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
- DOCUME [[]]
- NT [[]]
- IN [[]]
- 007 PIR.DO C G Publicly Available G Non-Publicly Available G Sensitive G Non-Sensitive To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
- OFFICE [[]]
- RIII [[]]
- RIII [[]]
- NAME [[]]
- RECORD [[]]
- COUNTY [[]]
- AND [[]]
- AND [[]]
- INSPEC [[]]