ML15013A156

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:03, 31 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

01/14/15, Meeting Slide Regarding Dresden Nuclear Power Station Pre-Application Meeting for Providing Natural Gas as a Primary Fuel to Station Auxiliary Heating Boilers
ML15013A156
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/2015
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To: Mozafari B
Plant Licensing Branch III
Mozafari B
References
Download: ML15013A156 (21)
v • d • e


Text

Dresden Nuclear Power Station Pre-Application Meeting Providing Natural Gas as a Primary Fuel to Station Auxiliary Heating Boilers January 14, 2015

Agenda

  • Introductions
  • Dresden Nuclear Power Station ((DNPS)) Heating g Boiler

Background

  • Applicable Regulatory Requirements
  • Heating Boiler Fuel Hazard Analysis
  • Description of FLACS Capabilities
  • Brief Description of DNPS FLACS Analysis
  • Validation of FLACS Analysis Results
  • Summary
  • Discussion/Regulatory Challenges/Feedback 2 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Introductions - Exelon Personnel in Attendance

  • Paul Wojtkiewicz - DNPS Senior Manager Plant Engineering
  • Filippo Gavelli - GexCon US
  • Jayram Patel - DNPS Design Engineering
  • Tom Griffith - DNPS Regulatory Assurance
  • Mitch Mathews - Exelon Corporate Licensing 3 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS - Heating Boiler Background

  • The recently installed Auxiliary Heating Boilers:

Provide plant heating to DNPS buildings and heating steam to various vaporizers. No Safety Related functions associated with these boilers Dual fuel design (i.e., can operate with natural gas or fuel oil)

Currently operated using fuel oil 4 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS - Heating Boiler Background (Cont) - Site Layout 5 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS - Heating Boiler Background (Cont) - Site Layout 6 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Applicable Regulatory Requirements

  • NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.78, Rev. 1, Evaluating the Habitability of A Nuclear Power Plant Control Room During A Postulated Hazardous Chemical Release, Release, is used to assess the habitability of the control room during and after a postulated external release of hazardous chemicals from mobile or stationary sources, offsite or onsite.
  • RG 1.91, Rev. 2, " Evaluations of Explosions Postulated to Occur at Nearby Facilities and on Transportation Routes Near Nuclear Power Plants " can be used to evaluate onsite hazards as discussed in NRC Plants, Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 2.2.1-2.2.2, Identification of Potential Hazards in Site Vicinity.

7 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS - Heating Boiler Fuel Hazard Analysis

  • Hazard analysis utilized the same rationale as described in the Staff Regulatory Guidance of RG 1.91, Rev. 2. The following hazards were considered sufficiently low:
1. Those that are greater than 491 feet of vital structures, systems, and components (Lower effective yields may be justified by analyses accounting for reaction kinetics)
2. Those that have a frequency that is less than 10-6 occurrences per year, when based on conservative assumptions, or 10-7 per year when based on realistic assumptions
3. Those that do not impair the ability of safety-related structures to perform as-designed (Effective yields based on analyses accounting for reaction kinetics)
  • Previous analyses were based on the method of evaluation presented in the NRC Safety Evaluation Report for the Hartsville Nuclear Plant, dated March 1976 1976.

8 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS Hazard Analysis (Cont.) -Current Analysis

  • Utilizing currently approved methods (i.e., Hartsville method), a number of plant structures would experience an unacceptable pressure wave.

Boiler House Turbine T bi B Building ildi W Wallll Main Power Transformer 9 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS Hazard Analysis (Cont.) - Concerns

  • Since the heating boilers are in close proximity to vital SSCs the hazard is within the 491 foot radius described in RG 1.91.
  • While safety systems are designed to detect and automatically isolate natural gas leakage in the Heating Boiler Building, Exelon has not yet concluded that the hazard frequency is less than 10-7 per year.
  • The use of TNT equivalency results in effective yields that are unacceptably high; therefore, a new method of evaluation is required to determine realistic yields based on an analysis technique that accounts for reaction kinetics as discussed in RG 1.91, Rev. 2.
  • Exelon chose GexCon USs FLame ACceleration Simulator (FLACS):

Accounts for vapor cloud explosion (VCE) interaction with site SSCs Provides realistic blast yields based on experimental data Widely recognized as accurate by government agencies such as U

U.S. S Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

10 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS Hazard Analysis (Cont.) - Comparison of Methods TNT Methodology:

  • Point source detonation
  • Sharp p rise in overpressure p and has a very y short duration
  • Over predicts VCE near field pressure and under predicts in the far field
  • Efficiency factor can only be estimated
  • Results in p plant structures experiencing p g an unacceptablep pressure wave.

p Turbine Building Wall Main Power Transformer Dry Cask Storage FLACS computer code (CFD 3-D modeling):

  • Covers large area and begins as a deflagration
  • Produces a more gradual rise in pressure over longer period of time
  • Evaluates the congestion and confinement in areas within the vapor cloud
  • Conservatively assumes the boiler house was filled with a stoichiometric mixture of natural gas g and air for dispersion p analyses y 11 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Description of FLACS Capabilities FLACS is a process-safety specific consequence modeling software tool which includes:

  • Integrated I t t d explosion, l i fi fire and d di dispersion i modelingd li capabilities biliti
  • Geometry import from several 3D Computer Aided Drafting programs
  • Gas mixtures
  • Mitigation and preventive measures Vent panels, panels water deluge deluge, inerting
  • Extensive validation 12 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Description of FLACS Capabilities (continued)

  • Structured Cartesian grid
  • Distributed porosity concept (sub-grid modelling)
  • RANS standard k-epsilon model
  • Modified SIMPLE solver
  • Compressible p and incompressible p solvers
  • OpenMP parallel processing
  • Explosion Combustion model Artifically thickened flame zone Tuned parameters based on 35 years of validation Semi-empirical model for turbulent flame speed
  • Eddy dissipation concept (EDC) combustion model for fire modeling
  • Atmospheric boundary layer profiles
  • Methodology for calculating equivalent stoichiometric gas clouds for deterministic or probabilistic explosion consequence modeling 13 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Brief Description of DNPS FLACS Analysis

  • The FLACS computer code used for internal and external vapor cloud explosion (VCE) deflagration analyses when variables affecting the explosion (e.g. unusual geometry or highly variable congestion)
  • Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of the natural gas explosion scenario in the DNPS Heating Boiler Building using FLACS
  • CFD modeling to predict the explosion energy, explosion severity, as well as blast pressure and impulse at various distances/locations of interest 14 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

DNPS FLACS Analysis (Cont) - Key Analysis Assumptions

  • A natural gas leak occurs
  • All gasg detection and fail safe systems y fail
  • The entire open air volume of Heating Boiler Building is filled with natural gas and air (Conservative)
  • Ignition occurs in the center of the building
  • Wall panels fail and relieves internal pressure
  • Heating Boiler Building windows allow venting of the explosion 15 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

FLACS Analysis (Cont) - Overpressure Blast Contours for Accidental NG Explosion in Heating Boiler Building BOILER HOUSE Turbine Building 16 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

FLACS Analysis (Cont) - Overpressure Blast Impulse for Accidental NG Explosion in Heating Boiler Building BOILER HOUSE Turbine Building 17 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

FLACS Analysis (Cont) - Results

  • Turbine Building (TB) walls will not be superficially damaged - not expected to be perforated nor will it experience scabbing
  • Th critical The iti l MCC equipment i t within ithi th the TB would ld remain i operational ti l
  • A natural gas explosion in the Heating Boiler Building does not present a credible event threat to Dry Cask Storage Area based on distance
  • Assume the Unit 3 Main Power Transformer would be lost due to the VCE and resulting pressure wave
  • There will be no offsite release or offsite dose associated with a postulated VCE in the DNPS Heating Boiler Building 18 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Validation of FLACS Analysis Results

  • FLACS widely used; however, no precedent for its use in any licensing actions
  • Numerous experiments have been conducted to validate FLACS analyses
  • FLACS explosion l i studies t di h have b been accepted t dbby government agencies worldwide (DOT/PHMSA in the US, but also in Australia and several countries in Europe)
  • Results of experiments that compare analyses to empirical data is readily available for NRC audit and or review 19 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Summary

  • Through utilization of FLACS, EGC has determined that no SSCs required for safe shutdown will sustain damage from a VCE in the DNPS Heating Boiler Building that will render them incapable of performing their designated safety function.

function

  • Explosion will not result in exposures that result in radiological dose in excess of the 10 CFR 50.34(a)(1) as it relates to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.67
  • NRC review is required to allow implementation for the use of FLACS as a departure from a method of evaluation described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report used in establishing the design bases or in the safety analyses.

20 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Discussion/Regulatory Challenges/Feedback 21 Dresden Nuclear Power Station Natural Gas Fuel for Station Heating Boilers Pre-Application Meeting

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15013A156&oldid=2039150"