ML12243A466

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:43, 22 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review Results Email - for Relief Request Related to Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques (TAC Nos. ME9171, ME9172 and ME9173)
ML12243A466
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 08/30/2012
From: Lauren Gibson
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Russell S
Arizona Public Service Co
Gibson L
References
TAC ME9171, TAC ME9172, TAC ME9173
Download: ML12243A466 (1)


Text

From:Gibson, Lauren To: Russell.Stroud@aps.com; Robert.Roehler@aps.com Cc: Thomas.Weber@aps.com

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR RELIEF REQUEST RELATED TO PHASED ARRAY ULTRASONICEXAMINATION TECHNIQUES (TAC NOS. ME9171, ME9172, ME9173)

Date:Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:07:00 PM

SUBJECT:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW RESULTS FOR RELIEF REQUEST RELATED TO PHASED ARRAY ULTRASONIC EXAMINATION TECHNIQUES (TAC NOS. ME9171, ME9172, ME9173)

By letter dated August 1, 2012, Arizona Public Service, the licensee, submitted a relief request for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.

The purpose of this e-mail is toprovide the results of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request.

The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.

The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether theapplication has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and made an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.

Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance reviewas compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review.

If additional information is needed,you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Lauren K. Gibson Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1056