Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARNL-12-1893, License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA-805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants (2001 Edition)2012-09-25025 September 2012 License Amendment Request to Adopt NFPA-805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants (2001 Edition) Project stage: Request ML12345A3982012-12-12012 December 2012 Supplemental Information Needed for Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Concerning Voluntary Fire Protection Risk Initiative Request (TAC Nos. ME9741 and ME9742)(NL-12-1893) Project stage: Acceptance Review NL-12-2566, Supplemental Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants (2001 Edition)2012-12-20020 December 2012 Supplemental Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants (2001 Edition) Project stage: Supplement ML13022A1582013-01-24024 January 2013 Acceptance Review Concerning Voluntary Fire Protection Risk Initiative Request (TAC Nos. ME9741 and ME9742) (N-1-2-1893) Project stage: Acceptance Review ML13050A2862013-02-22022 February 2013 3/7/2013 - Forthcoming Meeting Notice with Southern Nuclear Company to Discuss Responses to Requests for Additional Information Related to Amendment Requests to Transition to the National Fire Protection Association NFPA-805 Methodology Project stage: RAI ML13067A2692013-03-11011 March 2013 Forthcoming Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company Regarding Voluntary Fire Protection Risk Initiative Amendment Request for Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Meeting ML13176A0932013-07-0808 July 2013 Request for Additional Information Concerning Voluntary Fire Protection Risk Initiative Request (TAC Nos. ME9741 and ME9742) (NL-12-1893) Project stage: RAI ML14038A0192013-09-16016 September 2013 Joseph M. Farley, Units 1 and 2, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generati Project stage: Request NL-13-2039, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants2013-10-30030 October 2013 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI NL-13-2269, Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants2013-11-12012 November 2013 Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI ML14066A0472014-03-0707 March 2014 Electronic Transmission, Draft Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt Nation Fire Protection Association Standard 805 (TAC ME9741 and ME9742 Project stage: Draft RAI ML14073A0532014-03-28028 March 2014 Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Project stage: RAI NL-14-0446, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants2014-04-23023 April 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI ML14108A0052014-04-23023 April 2014 April 23, 2014, Public Meeting Presentation Slides, Southern Nuclear Company, SNC Degraded Grid Design Criteria Project stage: Request NL-14-0733, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants2014-05-23023 May 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI NL-14-0927, Response to RAI Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants. Part 1 of 32014-07-0303 July 2014 Response to RAI Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants. Part 1 of 3 Project stage: Response to RAI ML14176A0702014-07-11011 July 2014 Request for Additional Information Project stage: RAI NL-14-1106, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Lioht Water Reactor Generating Plants2014-08-11011 August 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Lioht Water Reactor Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI NL-14-1273, Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request for Transition to 10CFR50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for LWR Generating Plants2014-08-29029 August 2014 Response to Request for Additional Information Re License Amendment Request for Transition to 10CFR50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for LWR Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI NL-14-1937, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants2015-01-16016 January 2015 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request for Transition to 10 CFR 50.48(c) - NFPA 805 Performance Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants Project stage: Response to RAI ML15023A0522015-01-23023 January 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Record of Review Dispositions to Fire PRA Facts and Observations for Southern Nuclear Operating Company Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Project stage: Request ML15043A4592015-02-24024 February 2015 Summary of Site Audit to Support the Review of a License Amendment Request for Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, to Transition to the National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Fire Protection Licensing Basis Project stage: Approval ML14308A0482015-03-10010 March 2015 Issuance of Amendment Regarding Transition to a Risk-Informed, Performance-Based Fire Protection Program in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.48(c) Project stage: Approval 2014-03-28
[Table View] |
Text
SNCDegradedGridDesignCriteria SNC Degraded Grid Design Criteria 1 April 23, 2014 Agenda *Purpose*Back g round g*New SNC Degraded Grid Relaying Design Criteria
- Methodology*Comments and Questions 2
Purpose Review the design criteria being used by Southern Nuclear for the new degraded grid voltage protective relaying at Hatch Nuclear Plant and Farley Nuclear plant. These criteria draw from previous industry guidance and ourownexperiencebutarenotintendedasacommitment our own experience , but are not intended as a commitment to any particular existing guidance document.Obtain NRC feedback on the criteria to help ensure that the implemented solutions meet NRC expectations for automaticprotectionforpotentialdegradedgrideventsand automatic protection for potential degraded grid events and resolve NRC findings from the related CDBIs.
3 Background For a potential degraded grid event, previous designs:*Relied on manual actions b y the transmission s y stem yyand plant operators to prevent an occurrence.*Some required Class 1E loads were not automatically ttdftidltid pro t ec t e d f rom a sus t a i ne d vo lt age i na d equacy.Therearecurrentlytwosubmittalsonthedocketonefor There are currently two submittals on the docket , one for Plant Farley and one for Plant Hatch, that include a schedule for the degraded grid modification projects. The LARbittlihlttilit LAR su b m itt a l s rev ise eac h p l an t s opera ti ng li cense t o include completion dates, by unit, for the modifications.
4 Background -Scope of Modifications *FNP:-Replacement of the existing degraded voltage relays-Raising the existing voltage setpoints.*HNP:Rltfthitidddltlildi-R ep l acemen t o f th e ex i s ti ng d egra d e d vo lt age re l ays i nc l u di ng change from 2 relays to 3 relays (2 of 3 logic). -Raising the existing voltage setpoints.-Replacement of 4 existing startup auxiliary transformers
-Addition of 2 new startup auxiliary transformers and 230KV breakers including associated relaying, fire protection, etc.-Upgrade of 4.16KV bus short circuit capability for 10 buses (breakers and bus bracing).
5 Background -Farley Schedule*January 2015 -Submit Farley License Amendment Request(LAR)
Request (LAR)*January 2016 -NRC approval of Farley LAR
-Designimplementation Spring Outage 2016 (U2R24) Design implementation begins on U2*Fall Outage 2016 (U1R27) -Design implementation biU1 b eg ins on U1*Fall Outage 2017 (U2R25) -Design implementation completedonU2 completed on U2*Spring Outage 2018 (U1R28) -Design implementation completed on U1 6
Background -Hatch Schedule*December 2015 -Submit Hatch License Amendment Request(LAR)
Request (LAR)*December 2016 -NRC approval of Hatch LAR
-Designimplementation Spring Outage 2017 (U2R24) Design implementation begins on U2*Spring Outage 2018 (U1R28) -Design implementation biU1 b eg ins on U1*Spring Outage 2019 (U2R25) -Design implementation completedonU2 completed on U2*Spring Outage 2020 (U1R29) -Design implementation completed on U1 7
Definitions & Acronyms*DVR -Degraded Voltage Relaying*MEV -Minimum Ex p ected Volta g e -The stead y state pg yvoltage level at the 4.16kV buses that is expected when the 230kV switchyard is at the minimum voltage based oncontingencystudiesdefinedbytheFSAR on contingency studies defined by the FSAR.*MRV -Minimum Required Voltage -The steady state voltage level at a Class 1E 4.16kV bus that is required for its safety-related loads to accomplish their safety functions. The safety-related motors shall be able to start successfullywiththe pre-startsteady
-statebusvoltage successfully with the pre start steady state bus voltage at the MRV.
8 Design Criteria -Voltage*The DVR shall be set such that offsite power will be automatically disconnected and transferred to onsite power during an extended degraded grid
condition (any voltage dip having a longer durationthanexpectedfornormaloraccident duration than expected for normal or accident operations). *The DVR on the Class 1E 4.16KV bus will be set so that, including tolerances, voltage dropout value will be above the MRV value.ThDVRlt tlildi*Th e DVR vo lt age rese t va l ue , i nc l u di ng tolerances, will be set below the MEV.
9 Design Criteria -Time Delay*The DVR minimum time delay will be set such that, with tolerances, it will delay actuation to prevent a spurious trip due to motor starting or
other momentary transient events.
- TheDVR maximumtimedelaywillbesetsuch
- The DVR maximum time delay will be set such that, with tolerances, it will:
-be less than the maximum time allowed for the diesel generator to start and obtain rated speed and voltage.-prevent loss of Class 1E functions when the voltage is inadequatebyactuationpriortoatripofloadson inadequate by actuation prior to a trip of loads on overload.10 Voltage Setpoint Methodology *Part 1 -Using maximum expected non-accident bus loading, determine minimum acceptable steady-state voltage for normal operation.*Part 2 -Using maximum expected accident loading, determinetheminimum pre-startvoltagethatprovides determine the minimum pre-start voltage that provides acceptable Class 1E motor starting (e.g. during LOCA
block motor starting)*Part 3 -Using maximum expected accident loading, determine the minimum steady-state voltage that providesacceptableClass1Emotoroperationand provides acceptable Class 1E motor operation and starting for individual motors.*The maximum voltage of Parts 1-3 determines the MRV 11(i.e. analytical limit).
DVR Voltage Setpoint ExampleSetting for normal steady state Setting to detect inadequate LOCA starting voltage prior to startsteadystate requirementSetting for LOCAsteady state requirement 12Colored bar represents the DVR voltage setting uncertainty & reset requirement DVR Voltage Setpoint Example Limiting PartSetting for normal steady state Setting to detect inadequate LOCA starting voltage prior to startsteadystate requirementSetting for LOCAsteady state requirement 13Colored bar represents the DVR voltage setting uncertainty & reset requirement DVR Time Delay Setpoint Example *Minimum Delay:-At MEV, LOCA block motor starting voltage transient lasts for 7 seconds (i.e. recovers above the DVR voltage reset value).-The duration of all other motor starting or fault transient events is less than 7 seconds.*Maximum Delay:-Upon a LOCA, the diesel must start and be at normal voltage andfrequency(iereadyforloading)at15seconds and frequency (i.e. ready for loading) at 15 seconds.-With inadequate voltage, motors cannot stall for greater than 12 seconds without tripping on overload.CidiDVRidlihi
- C ons id er i ng DVR t i me d e lay uncerta i nty, t h e sett i ng must be between 7 and 12 seconds.
14 LAR Submittal Content*Calculations (portions) demonstrating the use of the methodology and the setpoint results.-Criteria, methodology and assumptions-Steady-state and starting cases for the MEV and the DVR setting part of the anal y sis showin g volta ges for each Class 1E bus and pyggits required loads.-Setpoint uncertainty calculationsBasisfor setpoints-Basis for setpoints*List of the most limiting components for each study case.
15 Comments or Questions?
16