ML18346A511

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:02, 14 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Presentation Slides: 10 CFR 72_48 Evaluations and Inspection
ML18346A511
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/19/2018
From: Marlone Davis
Division of Spent Fuel Management
To:
Lindsay H K
Shared Package
ML18338A059 List:
References
Download: ML18346A511 (19)


Text

Session: Inspection Oversight Inspection Oversight and Regulatory Experience Related to the Review of 10 CFR 72.48 EvaluationsDivision of Spent Fuel ManagementRegulatory Conference 2018December 11

-12, 2018Marlone Davis, Sr. Storage and Transportation Safety InspectorU.S. NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and SafeguardsDivision of Spent Fuel Management 12/12/2018 2Content*Introduction

  • Background
  • Overview of Regulatory Experience and Practices
  • Summary*Questions 12/12/2018 3Introduction
  • The purpose of this presentation is to provide a brief overview of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulatory experience related to the inspection oversight of the review of 10 CFR 72.48 evaluations and provide information on the endorsement of the new guidance document.*Success for this presentation is to ensure that all interested parties have a general awareness of recent NRC regulatory experience and provide the status on the new guidance document.

12/12/2018 4BackgroundU.S. NRC RegulatoryExperience 12/12/2018BackgroundCertificate Holders: with NRC

-Approved Designs for UseNAC InternationalHoltec InternationalOranoTransnuclear(TN) AmericasEnergy Solutions 5 12/12/2018 6BackgroundDry Cask Storage Safety InspectionsNRC Inspection Manual Chapters (IMC)s

  • IMC 2690 -Inspection Program Guidance for Dry Storage of Spent Reactor Fuel at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations (ISFSI)s
  • IMC 2515, Appendix C

-Special and Infrequently Performed InspectionsNRC Inspection Procedure (IP)

  • IP 60851 -Design Control of ISFSI Components
  • IP 60853 -Onsite Fabrication of Components and Construction of an ISFSI
  • IP 60854 -Preoperational Testing of an ISFSI
  • IP 60855 -Operation of an ISFSI
  • IP 60857 -Review of 10 CFR 72.48 Evaluations 12/12/2018 7BackgroundIP 60857 Inspection Requirements Inspection Sample Selection
  • Review a list of evaluations performed and select a representative sample based on a judgment of risk significance
  • Select a sample that were screened out as not requiring a performance of the 10 CFR 72.48 evaluationReview of Evaluations
  • Review the selected sample evaluations to verify that the licensee or certificate holder has appropriately considered the conditions under which the change was made
  • Review the selected screen to determine that an evaluation was not required and verify that the conclusions were correct and consistent with the licensee's 10 CFR 72.48 procedure 12/12/2018 8BackgroundInspection GuidanceRegulatory Guide 3.72, "Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 72.48, Changes, Test, and Experiments," Revision 0Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 96

-07, Appendix B dated March 5, 2001 12/12/2018 9Overview -Applicability ProcessApplicability Determination

  • Applicability Determination is to determine the correct regulatory change control process, if any for all or part of a proposed activity
  • Generally three to four questions to determine if the proposed activity is applicable 12/12/2018 10Overview -Screening ProcessScreening for Adverse Effects
  • Screening is the process for determining whether a proposed activity requires a 10 CFR 72.48 evaluation to be performed
  • Generally three to four questions to determine if the proposed activity is adversely impactedScreening for Methods of Evaluation
  • Determine if an activity involves a method of evaluation (MOE)
  • Distinguishing between input parameters and elements 12/12/2018 11Overview -72.48(c)(2) Criteria

-Evaluation10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2) i*Does the proposed activity result in more than a minimal increase in the frequency of occurrence of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR (as updated)?10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)ii

  • Does the proposed activity result in more than a minimal increase in the likelihood of occurrence of a malfunction of a system, structure, or component (SSC) important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR (as updated)?

12/12/2018 12Overview -72.48(c)(2) Criteria -Evaluation10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)iii

  • Does the proposed activity result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of an accident previously evaluated in the FSAR (as updated)?10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)iv
  • Does the proposed activity result in more than a minimal increase in the consequences of a malfunction of an SSC important to safety previously evaluated in the FSAR?

12/12/2018 13Overview -72.48(c)(2) Criteria -Evaluation10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)v

  • Does the proposed activity create a possibility for an accident of a different type than any previously evaluated in the FSAR (as updated)?10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)vi
  • Does the proposed activity create a possibility for a malfunction of an SSC important to safety with a different result than any previously evaluated in the FSAR (as updated)?

12/12/2018 14Overview -72.48(c)(2) Criteria -Evaluation10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)vii

  • Does the proposed activity result in a design basis limit for a fission product barrier as described in the FSAR (as updated) being exceeded or altered?10 CFR 72.48 Criterion (c)(2)viii
  • Does the proposed activity result in a departure from a method of evaluation described in the FSAR (as updated) used in establishing the design bases or in the safety analyses?

10/30/2018 15OverviewRegulatory ExperienceMethod of Evaluation (MOE)Screenings vs. EvaluationsMeeting the applicable criteria of 10 CFR 72.48(c)(2)Nonconforming or Degraded Conditions 12/12/2018 16OverviewRegulatory Guide 3.72 Update

  • The staff expects the DG to be out for public comment within the next six months.

12/12/2018 17SummaryReview of10 CFR 72.48 Evaluations Method of EvaluationMeeting the applicable criteria of 10 CFR 72.48(c)(2)Screenings vs. EvaluationsNonconforming or Degraded Conditions 12/12/2018 18 12/12/2018 19ReferencesCode of Federal Regulations(CFR), Title 10, Part 72

-Licensing Requirements for the Independent Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel, High-Level Radioactive Waste, and Reactor

-Related Greater Than Class C Waste.Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2690, Inspection Program for Dry Storage of Spent Reactor Fuel at Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations and for 10 CFR Part 71 Transportation Packaging Regulatory Guide 3.72, Guidance for Implementation of 10 CFR 72.48, Changes, Tests, and Experiments