Text

Boiling Water Reactor License Termination Plan - Chapter 2 - Site Characterization, Rev. 0
	ML16200A086
Person / Time
Site:	La Crosse File:Dairyland Power Cooperative icon.png
Issue date:	06/27/2016
From:	; LaCrosseSolutions
To:	; Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
References
	Download: ML16200A086 (83)
	v • d • e

LA CROSSE BOILIN G WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION

La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.Sit e 2.1.2.1.2.1.2 2 2 2

2 2.1.

2.1.4 2 2 2.1.

2.1.2 2

2 2

2 2 2.2.2.2.

2.2.2 2

2 2 2.2.2 2 2.2.4 2.2.2.3.2.3.

2.3.

2.3.4 2 2 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Characteri z Historical S 1.Object i 2.Metho d.1.2.1.Pr e.1.2.2.Do c.1.2.3.Li c.1.2.4.Pe r.1.2.5.Pr o 3.Operat i 4.Incide n.1.4.1.Ra d.1.4.2.Ch e 5.Findin g 6.Initial S.1.6.1.Su r.1.6.2.Su r.1.6.3.Cl a.1.6.4.Cl a.1.6.5.Cl a.1.6.6.No n.1.6.7.Cl a.1.6.8.Cl a Characteriz 1.Data Q 2.Surve y.2.2.1.Nu m.2.2.2.De t.2.2.3.Sc a.2.2.4.Ty p 3.Instru m Conce n.2.3.1.Ca l.2.3.2.Ins t 4.Labor a 5.Qualit ySummary o 1.Backg r 2.Potent i 3.Non-I m 4.Impact.3.4.1.Cl a.3.4.2.Cl a W ater Reacto r Plan z ation ..........

S ite Assess m i ves ............

d ology ........liminary Cl a cument Rev i enses, Per m r sonnel Inte r o perty Inspe c i onal Histor y n ts ...............

diological S p emical Spill s g s and Conc S urvey Are a rvey Areas ..

r vey Units...

a ss 1 Open L a ss 2 Open L a ss 3 Open L n-Impacted O ass 1 Structu r a ss 2 and 3 S ation Appro Q uality Obje c y Design ......

m ber of Sta t termination o a n Coverage p es of Meas u m entation Se n trations (M l ibration......

trument Us e atory Instru m y Assurance f Characteri r ound Study i al Radionu c m pacted Op e ed Open La n a ss 1 Open L a ss 2 Open L r TABLE O...................

.m ent .............

....................

.assification .

.i ew .............

.m its and Aut h r views .........

.c tions ..........

.y .................

....................

.p ills ............

.s .................

.lusions .......

.a s/Units and

...................

....................

.Land Areas ..

.O pen Land A r es ..............

.S tructures ....

.ach .............

.c tives ..........

....................

.tic Measure m of Static M e..................

.urements an dlection, Use M DCs) .........

....................

.e and Contro m ent Metho d...................

.z ation Surv e...................

.c lides of Co n e n Land Are a nd Areas ....

.Land Areas ..

.2-i OF CONT E...................

....................

.horizations ..

....................

.Classificati o...................

....................

.A reas .........

....................

.m ents and/o r easurement a...................

.d Samples ..

. and Minim u...................

....................

.l .................

.d s and Sensi t...................

.ey Results ..

....................

.n cern ...........

.a s ...............

....................

.E NTS ...................

....................

.o n ...............

....................

.r Samples ...

.and Sample L...................

....................

.um Detecta b...................

....................

.t ivities ........

....................

.L ocations ...

....................

.b le ...................

....................

.... 2-1... 2-2... 2-2... 2-3... 2-3... 2-4... 2-5... 2-5... 2-5... 2-6... 2-6... 2-7... 2-8... 2-8... 2-9... 2-9... 2-9. 2-10. 2-10. 2-10. 2-11. 2-11. 2-12. 2-12. 2-14. 2-14. 2-15. 2-16. 2-16. 2-16. 2-18. 2-18. 2-19. 2-19. 2-19. 2-20. 2-21. 2-22. 2-22. 2-24. 2-25. 2-26 La Cros s License T Revisio n 2 2.3.2.3.2 2

2 2.3.2 2

2 2

2 2.4.2.5. s e Boiling W Termination n 0 .3.4.3.Cl a 5.Non-I m 6.Impact.3.6.1.Ba s.3.6.2.Tu r.3.6.3.L A 7.Surfac e.3.7.1.Ar e.3.7.2.Gr o.3.7.3.Pr e.3.7.4.On-.3.7.5.Su m Continuing References W ater Reacto r Plan a ss 3 Open L m pacted Str u ed Structur e sement Stru c r bine Buildi n A CBWR Ad m e and Groun e a Groundw a o undwater F vious Inves t-Going Inve mmary of G r Characteriz a...................

r Land Areas ..

.u ctures ........

.es and Syste m ctures Belo w n g Tunnel...

.ministration dwate r ........ater Use .....

.low ............

.t igations .....

.stigations ...

.r oundwater A a tion ..........

....................

.2-ii ...................

....................

.ms ..............

.w 636 foot E l...................

.Building ....

....................

.Analytical R...................

....................

.levation .....

....................

.R esults ........

....................

.. 2-27. 2-29. 2-30. 2-30. 2-31. 2-31. 2-32. 2-32. 2-33. 2-34. 2-35. 2-35. 2-36. 2-37 La Cros s License T Revisio n Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 2-4 Table 2-5 Table 2-6 Table 2-7 Table 2-8 Table 2-9 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Table 2-1 Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2-Figure 2- s e Boiling W Termination n 0 1LACB W 2LACB W 3Instru m 4Off-Si t 52005 D 6Investi g 7Initial S 8Non-I m Surve y 9Non I m Labor a 1 0ImpactSumm a 1 1Class 1 Labor a 1 2Impact Surve y 1 3Class 2 Labor a 1 4Impact Surve y 1 5Class 3 Labor a 1 6Concr e 1 71983 G Buildi n 1 82013 G 1 92014 G-1LACB W-2LACB W-3LACB W-4LACB W-5Non I m-6Class 1-7Class 2-8Class 3-9Concr e-10LACB-11Groun d W ater Reacto r Plan WR Open L WR Structu r m ent Types a te Laborator y D airyland B a gative Leve l Suite of LA C m pacted Op e y Summary .

m pacted Coa atory Analy s ed Class 1 O ary .............

Concrete, A atory Analy s ed Class 2 O y Summary .

2 Asphalt, S e atory Analy s ed Class 3 O y Summary .

3 Asphalt, S e atory Analy s ete Core Isot G roundwater n g ...............

G roundwater G roundwater W R Site M a W R Site M a W R Site Dr a W R LCE E x m pacted Op e Open Lan d 2 Open Lan d 3 Open Lan d ete Core Sa m W R Site - T d water Sam p r LIST and Survey ral Survey U and Nomina l y Analytica l a ckground S t l s for Cs-13 7 C BWR Site-e n Land Sur v...................

.l Pile and S o sis (pCi/g) ...

.O pen Land S...................

.A sphalt, Se d sis (pCi/g) ...

.O pen Land S...................

.ediment and s is ...............

.O pen Land S...................

.ediment and sis (pCi/g) ...

.opic Analys Analysis fr o...................

.Monitoring Monitoring LIST O a p - Open L a a p - Buildin g a inage and S x clusion Ar e e n Land Sa m d Sampling L d Sampling L d Sampling L m pling Loca t T ypical Geol o p ling Wells iii OF TABL E U nits..........

.U nits ............

.l MDCs ......

.l Methods a n t udy for Soi l 7 Based on B-Specific Ra v ey Units -

C...................

.oil Samples

-...................

.S urvey Units

...................

.diment and S...................

.S urvey Units

...................

.Soil Sampl e...................

.S urvey Units

...................

.Soil Sampl e...................

.is Results ...

.om Tempor a...................

.Results .....

.Results (p C O F FIGUR E a nd Survey U gs Identific a Sewer Map .

.ea (Class 1) .

.m pling Locat i L ocations ....

.L ocations ....

.t ions ...........

.o gical Cros s- LACBW R E S ...................

....................

.n d Typical M l s ................

.B ackground dionuclides

.C haracteriz a...................

.- Test Ame r...................

. - Characte r...................

.Soil Samples

...................

. - Characte r...................

.e s - Test A m...................

. - Characte r...................

.e s - Test A m...................

....................

.a ry Well-P o...................

....................

.C i/L) ...........

.RES U nits and C l a tion ............

....................

.i ons ............

....................

.s-Section ....

.R Site ..........

....................

.M DCs .........

....................

.Studies ......

....................

.a tion ...................

.r ica ...................

.rization Sur v...................

. - Test Am e...................

.rization ...................

.m erica ...................

.rization ...................

.m erica ...................

....................

.oint South o f...................

....................

.lassification

...................

....................

.v ey ...................

.e rica ...................

....................

.f Turbine ...................

....................

. ..................

....................

.. 2-39. 2-40. 2-42. 2-43. 2-44. 2-45. 2-46. 2-47. 2-49. 2-50. 2-51. 2-52. 2-53. 2-54. 2-55. 2-56. 2-60. 2-61. 2-62. 2-64. 2-65. 2-66. 2-67. 2-68. 2-69. 2-70. 2-71. 2-72. 2-75. 2-76 La Cros s License T Revisio nAEC ALARA bgs CRD DCGL DQO EPA FCP FESW FRS FSS G-1 G-3 HSA HTD IR ISFSI LACB W LER LSA LSE LTP MARL A MARS A MARSS I MDC MDCR MWe NIST s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Unite d As L o Belo w Contr Deriv Data Q Unite d Force Fuel E Final Final Geno a Geno a Histo r Hard-Incid e Indep WR La C r Licen Low S LAC B Licen A P Multi-A ME Multi-Man u I M Multi-Mini m Mini m Mega w Natio n W ater Reacto r Plan LIST OF d States At o o w As Reas o w Ground S u ol Rod Driv

ed Concent r Q uality Obj e d States En v d Circulatio n Element Sto r Radiation S u Status Surv e a 1 Coal/Oil a 3 Fossil S t rical Site A s to-Detect e nt Reports endent Spe n r osse Boilin gsee Event R S pecific Act B WR Site E nse Terminat i-Agency Ra d-Agency Ra d u al -Agency Ra d m al Detecta b mum Detect a watt Electri c nal Institute r ACRONY Mmic Energy o nably Achi e u rface e r ation Guide ective vironmental P n Pump rage Well urvey e y Station tation sessment n t Fuel Stor a g Water Rea c eports ivity n closure i on Plan diological L diation Sur v diation Sur v ble Concent r a ble Count R c of Standar d 2-iv M S AND A BCommissio n e vable line Levels P rotection A age Installati o c to r Laboratory A v ey and Ass e v ey and Site rations R ate d s and Tech n B BREVIA T n A gency on Analytical Pr o essment of MInvestigatio n ology TIONS otocols Ma n M aterials an d n Manual n ual d Equipmen t t La Cros s License T Revisio nNRC ORC PSDAR QA QAPP QC RCA REMP ROC RPV SRC STS TSD WDNR WGTV WTB ZNPS s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Unite d Oper a Post-S Quali t Quali t Quali t Radi o Radi o Radi o React Safet y Sour c Tech nWisc o Wast e Wast e Zion N W ater Reacto r Plan d States Nu c ational Revi e S hutdown D t y Assuranc e t y Assuranc e t y Control o logically C o o active Effl u o nuclides of or Pressure V y Review C o e Term Sur v n ical Suppo r o nsin Depar t e Gas Tank V e Treatment N uclear Po w r clear Regul a e w Committecommissio e e Project Pl a o ntrolled Ar e ent Monitor Concern V essel ommittee v ey rt Document tment of Na t V ault Building w er Station 2-v atory Comm i ee ning Activi t a n e a ing Reports t ural Resou r i ssion ties Report rces La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 W ater Reacto r Plan r Page Inten t 2-vi t ionally Le ft ft Blank La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.S In acco r Regulat o Nuclear characte r The pur p conduct eremain.

License Tof comp l Survey (1575, Mu Source Tterminat i The site quantify characte rsite that classific a The ch aNUREG-Decomm Criteria, PG-EO-3 Reactor Charact e the Data informat iremediat at conce nremoved The dec o waste o f LACB W None o f radiolog i planned a G-3 po wminor st rThe maj o basemen t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 S ite Char a rdance wit h ory Guide 1

.Power R e r ization per fo p ose of site e d in all ar eThe term "

F Terminatio n liance surve y FSS) for o p u lti-Agency T erm Surv e i on. See LT Pcharacterizthe extent a rization sur vwill require a tion and vo l a racterizatio n-1575 (M A issioning G Final Repo r 3 13196-SV-P(4), and G P e rization Pr o Quality Ob j i on obtaine d i on plannin g ntrations gr e and proper l ommissioni n f all LAC B WR Adminis t fthe buildi n ically impa c and these st r w er operatio n r uctures wil l o r sub-grad e t s of the R e W ater Reacto r Plan acterizatio n h the requi

.179, Stand a e actors (1), fo rmed at th e characteriz a e as where c o F inal Radia t n Plan (LTP

)y s that will b p en land ar e Radiation S e y (STS) f o P Chapte r 5 ation incor p a nd nature o v eys and an a remediatio n l umes, and e n survey w A RSSIM) G uidance -

C r t, (3). In a d P L-001, C h P-EO-3131 9 oject (QAP P j ective (DQ O d from the

g. Materials e ater than t h ly packaged n g approach B WR b uild i t ration buil d n gs and str u c ted such t h ructures, in c n s. The pu b l also remai n e structures t e actor Build i r n rements o f a rd Format

, this cha p e La Crosse B ation is to e n ontaminatio n tion Survey

") in order to be performe d e as and buri S urvey and S o r below g r for a descri p p orates the r of contamin a lyses have b n , as well a s estimate cos t w as designe d and NUR E C haracteriz a d dition, sur v haracterizati o 9 6-QA-PL-0 0 P) (5) which O) process, a characteri z which wer e he unrestrict efor shipme n for LACB W i ngs, struct u d ing and Cr i uctures ass o hat they req u c luding the G blic roads a n n. that will b e i ng, Waste T 2-1 f 10 CFR 5 0 and Cont e p ter provid e Boiling Wa t nsure that t h n existed, r e" is from 1 0 acknowled g d at LACB W ed piping b Site Investi g r ound struc t p tion of the r esults of i nation at L A b een and co n s to plan re m t s. d and exe c E G-1757, a tion, Surv e veys were d e o n Survey P 0 1, Quality describes p and measur e z ation provi e shown to b e d release c r n t and dispo s WR requires u res and c o ib House) t o ociated with uire remedi G-3 Crib Ho u nd railways backfilled a Treatment B 0.82 (a)(9)(i i e nts for Lic e s a desc r t er Reactor (he Final Ra d emains, or h 0 CFR 50.82 g e the disti n W R. These ased on gu i g ation Manu t ures to be FRS. n vestigatio n A CBWR. I n ntinue to be mediation m c uted using Volume 2, e y, and De esigned and Plan for thAssurance p olicy, orga n e s necessary des guidan c be contamin a r iteri a have sal. the demoli t omponents o a depth o f h the Geno a al actions; use, will re mthat traver s and remain a B uilding (W i)(A) and tense Termi n r iption of (LACBWR) diation Surv h as the pot e (9)(ii)(D) a n n ction betw esurveys are; i dance prov i al (MARS Sbackfilled ns and surv e n addition, t h e used to ide m ethodologi e the guida n Revision 1 termination executed i n e La Cros s Project Pl a nization, fu n to achieve q c e for dec o a ted with ra dbeen and w i tion, remov a (with the e f at least 3 f a 3 Fossil Stherefore, n main intact a se the site a a t license te r W TB), Waste t he guidan c nation Pla n the radiol osite. ey (FRS) w ential to ex i n d is used i n e en the two 1) a Final S i ded in NU R S IM) (2) an dprior to li c e ys conduct he results o ntify areas o es, develop w n ce provid e 1 , Consoli d of Radiol o n accordanc e s e Boiling W a n LACBW R n ctional acti v quality data.

ontaminatio n dioactive m a ill continue al and dispo s e xception o feet below g S tation (G-3 no remediati and function as well as s e rmination a r Gas Tank V ce of ns for ogical will be i st or n this types Status R EG-d 2) a c ense ed to of site of the waste ed in dated o gical e with Water R Site vities, The n and a terial to be s al as f the grade. 3) are ion is al for e veral r e the Vault La Cros s License T Revisio n (WGTV)(3 feet b Reactor/Gsump an d In the Rremovedremoved elevatio n WTB, t h concrete the rema cap and pfollowin g covered bremaini n LTP Ch a Indepen d shown i n 2.1.H In acco r Assessm informat i reports, marine f Environ mcompile d 2.1.1.O The HS A LACB W surroun d resulted Radiolo g subsurfa c the 1.5 ainformat imay als o The sco p hazardo u The objeI d b s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ) and the r eelow grade

)Generator P d the Turbi n R eactor Bui. All inter n , leaving o n n (i.e., conc r h e only porti footers bel oining struct u p iles below t g the termin a by at least 3 n g backfille d a pter 1, se c dent Spent F n Figure 2-1

)Historical Si rdance wit h ent (HSA) i on, includi n pre-operati o f auna and s m ental Rep o d for this in v O b jectives A was a d WR activities dings. The in contami n gically Cont r ce soils out s a cre fenced ion compile o be used as p e of the us materials. ctives of th e d entify pote ased on exi s W ater Reacto r Plan emainder o f ). These re Plant, the o ne pit. lding, all i n n al concrete n ly the rem a r ete "bowl" on of the st r ow the 636 f o u re will con s t he 636 foot ation of the l feet of soil d structures t o c tion 1.3.1 d F uel Storage

) is exclude d te Assessm e h the guid a (6) was p n g any 10 C o nal survey sediment s u orts to the vestigation.

detailed inv erelated to rHSA focus e n ation of pl a r olled Area (ide of the R LACBWR d by the H Sinput into t hHSA inclu e HSA were ntial, likely s ting or deri v r fthe basem emaining str u ne foot thic k nternal str uwill be re m a ining struc t below 636 ructure that o ot elevatio n sist of the f l elevation.

T l icense are c and physic a o be plausib l d escribes thInstallatio n d from the s c e nt a nce provi d performed a C FR 50.75(g data, spill u rveys), ope Nuclear R e e stigation t o radioactive m e d on histo r ant systems

, (RCA). It a l R CA but wit h Site Enclo s S A was use d he develop m ded potent i to: , or known ved informa t 2-2 e nt structur e uctures incl u k portion o f uctural surf a moved to e x t ural concr e foot elevati o will remain

n. In the W G l oors and fo u T he structu r c onstructed o ally altered t l y occupied

.e site lice n (ISFSI) Fa c c ope of the L d ed in MA R a nd docum e g) files, em preports, sp erational su r e gulatory C o collect e x materials or r ical events

, buildings, l so addresse h in the own e sure (LSE) d to establi s m ent of rem e ial contami n sources of tion, es located b l ude the Pi p f the Chim n a ces, syste m xpose the st e e te outside t o n, concret e is the 630 a G TV and th e u ndation w a ral surfaces t o f steel rein f t o a conditi

o. n se boundar y c ility as loc a L TP. R SSIM, se c e nted in A u p loyee inte r e cial surve y rvey record s Commission x isting inf o other cont a and routi n surface an d d support st r er controlle darea shar e sh initial su r e diation pla n n ation fro m radioactive below the 6 3 p ing and V e n ey Founda t m s and co m eel liner, w h t he liner be e pile cap a n and 635 foo t e other rem a alls as well a that will re m f orce d conc r o n which w o y. The fe n a ted in Lot 7 ction 3.0, a u gust of 1 9 r views, radi y s (e.g., sit e s , and An n (NRC) we r ormation (f r aminants) f o ne operation a d subsurfac e r uctures, op e d area. The e the same r vey units.

ns and the d e m radioacti vand chemi 36 foot ele v entilation T u t ion, the T u mponents w i hich will al s low the 63 6 n d piles.)

I t floor, sum p aining base m as concrete p m ain at LAC B r ete which w o uld not allo w n ced area o 7 of the sit e a Historical 9 99. Hist o ological in c e aerial su r n ual Radiol o r e reviewe d rom the st a or the site a n al processe s e soils withi e n land are acurrent RC A boundary. This infor m e sign of the v e material s cal contam i v ation unnel, urbine ill be so be 6 foot I n the p and m ents, piling B WR will be w the of the e (and Site orical c ident r veys, ogical d and a rt of n d its s that in the as and A and The m ation FRS. s and i nants La Cros s License T Revisio nD nPPPP MD 2.1.2.M The obj emay hav e land are afailures rmaterial.contami n deconta m their pot e Each inc was furt hanalysis, samplin g location.

Relevan tremediat Also inc lRP p S i dInformat data, ev aUnits. 2.1.2.1.The HS Aclassific a have a p s e Boiling W Termination n 0 D istinguish po threat to h rovide an a s rovide info r rovide an i n rovide a gr a M ARSSIM g Delineate ini t M ethodolo gy ective of the e significan t a s and struc t resulting in Dependi n n ation varie s mination act i ential for co nident identi f h er investig aany reme d g , survey, a n Historical r t informati o i on phases o luded in the Relevant exc e ersonnel in t l ant person nite inspecti o d entify, loca t ion from th i a luation of r Preli m A investig a a tion of the potential for W ater Reacto r Plan p ortions of t human healt h ssessment o f rmation use fu nitial classifi c aded initial c g uidance, an d t ial survey u y HSA recor d t ly impacte d t ures. Thes e airborne rel n g upon p a s by area. I n i vities and F ntamination

.fied that po s a ted. This i n dial actions nd analysis i records pro v o n that be c of the licens e research as s erpts from w terviews, in c n el to confi r o n, utilizin g te, confirm, i s research w results, doc u m inary Clas s a tion was dsite land ar econtaminat i r h e site that m h , f the likeliho fu l to subseq u c ation of ar elassificatio n d u nit boundar i ds search an d d the hazard o e included s y eases, liqui d a st site op e n order to fa cRS plannin

g. sed a realist i nvestigatio n taken to m i n an attem p vided the so u comes avai l e terminatio n sociated wit h written repor t c luding the u rm docume n g historic si and docum e w as used in umentation o sification d esigned t o e as and stru c ion (based o 2-3 m ay need fu r od of conta m u ent contin u e as and stru c n for impact e i es and area s d interview ous materia l ystem, stru c d spills or r e e rations an d c ilitate effe c g, land area s ic potential t n focused o n m itigate the s p t to identi fy urce of a vas t lable durin g n plan will b h the develo p t s and corre s u se of ques t nted inciden tte drawing s e nt areas of c the HSA d e o f findings, o obtain su ctures as im p o n historica l rther action minant migr a u ing charact e c tures as no n e d soils and s s based upo nprocess wa s l or radiolo g cture, or are a eleases, or t d processes

, c tive charact s and struct u t o impact t h n the scope osituation, a n f y the "as l et majority o f g any add i be evaluated

.pment of th e s pondences, t ionnaires, o t s and iden t s , photogra p concern. evelopment, and the id e u fficient in fo p acted or n o l data) or c ofrom those ation, erization su r n-impacted o structures i n n the initial c s to identify g ical status o a contamina t he loss of c , the pote n terization, a n u res are clas s he character i of contamin a n d any pos t e ft" conditio f the docum e itional cha

r. e HSA were: o f current, f o t ify undocu m phs, prints, including t h entification formation t o on-impacted o ntain kno w that pose li t rveys, or impacte d , n accordanc e c lassificatio nthose event of LACBW R ation from s y c ontrol over ntial for re s n d to guide f s ified based i zation of th ant samplin g t-remedial a n of the in c e nts inspect e racterizatio n: ormer and r e m ented inci d and diagra m he compilatiof initial S u o provide i. Impacted wn contami n ttle or e with n. s that R site ystem solid sidual f uture upon e site g and action cident ed. n and e tired dents, ms to on of u rvey initial areas nation La Cros s License T Revisio n (based o through k is no re aimpacte d controll e If a land area cla swas ma d Initial c l historica l initial cl aat the ti m prepared FRS des iclassific acontinui n surveilla nclassific aof com m 2.1.2.2.Records source o f for LAC B include: OSLSOAERDHSR s e Boiling W Termination n 0 on past or p k nowledge o a sonable po d from a r a d areas wer e area or stru c s sification (e e based upo n lassification l radiologic a assification a me of identif

i. Final cla s i gn. The c h a tions indic a n g character i nce, and a n a tions (for e x mencement o f Docu mmaintained f document a B WR, man y Operational R afety Revie w L icensee Ev eite Initiated O perator Lo g A nnual Envi r Environment a R egulatory a c Documentati o Health Physi cite inspecti o Radiological W ater Reacto r Plan preliminary o f site histor yssibility for a diological p e also docu m cture was cl a e.g. Class 1, n the infor m of LACB W a l survey da t and (2) fina l i cation of th e ssification i s haracterizati o ated in the H i zation surv e n y other a p xample, fro m f the FRS.

m ent Revie wto satisfy t ation for th e y record typ e R eview Co m w Committ e e nt Reports (Incident Re p gs including ronmental M a l investiga t ctions conc e on from int e cs surveys a n o n and surve i and enviro n r radiologica l y or previo u residual r a perspective.

mented. assified as i mClass 2 or C m ation obtai n W R areas w t a. Classif y l classificat i e survey are s performed o n data was H SA as desc r eys, operati o p plicable su r m Class 3 t o w t he require m e HSA reco r es were eva l mmittee (OR C e e (SRC) M eLER) Sum m ports (IR), Reactor Op e M onitoring R t ions perfor m e rning the si t rviews con d nd samplin g illance type nmental surv 2-4 l surveillan c us survey in f adioactive c o Potential m pacted, th e Class 3) in a ned. w as based o ying a surve y i on. Initial c a using the i and verifie d used to va l ribed in this o nal survey s r vey data m o Class 2 an d m ents of 10 r ds review p l uated. A s u C) Meeting M e eting Minu t m aries, erator and H Reports, m ed by inde p te, d ucted with r g results ass odocuments a ey docume n c e). Non-i m formation a n ontaminatio nchemical h en a determi accordance w o n historic a y area has a classificatio n information d as a DQ O l idate or up d Chapter.

R s in suppo r t m ay cause d from Cla sCFR Part 5 0 process. Du r u mmary of t Minutes, tes, Health Physi c p endent enti t retired/sepa r o ciated with a ssociated w nts, m pacted ar e n d are those a n. Areas w h azards inci d ination of th ewith MAR S al informati ominimum o n of most a r available w h O during ch a date, as nec e R adiological of decomm i an increas e ss 2 to Class 0.75(g)(1) p r ing the co n t he types of cs entries, ties, rated site pe ridentified e v with identifi e eas are ide n a reas where were classifi e d ents on o w e initial imp SSIM, secti o o n and ava i of two stage r eas is perf o h en the HS A a racterizatio n e ssary, the i survey data i ssioning, r o e in survey s 1) until th e p rovided a m n duct of the records rev i rsonnel, vents, ed events, ntified there ed as w ne r-p acted o n 2.2 ilable s: (1) ormed A was n an d initial from o utine area e time m ajor HSA i ewed La Cros s License T Revisio nQ 2.1.2.3.LACB Wpermits. allowed D the site, activitie s Several glicensin gUUUWLFrom A u This per i 1987, an d 2.1.2.4.Intervie w about th e The per sthe parti c personn eterms be site kno w Between individu a standard isite pers othe pers omemori e operatio n 2.1.2.5.Several Several s s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Quality Cont r Licen WR was oper a The NRC D airyland P t o support o s. government g , constructi o United State s United State s United State s W isconsin D e L ocal/Count y ugust 28, 19 7 i od include s d ISFSI con s Perso n ws with curr e e site and to onnel inter v cipants as w e l were cho s i ng investig wledge and e 2010 and a ls contact e ized person n o nnel who w o nnel obser v s of other q n al period e x Prop e on-site pro p s ite events o f W ater Reacto r Plan r ol (QC) /Q uses, Permits a ted in acco r Operating L ower Coop e o perations d u and regulat o on, operatio n s Atomic En e s Nuclear R e s Environme n epartment o f y Governme n 73 to the pr e s power op e s truction an d nnel Intervi e e nt or previ o verify or cl views inclu d well as indiv i s en due to t hated for the e xperience t h 2011, app r e d as part nel survey w w orked at th v ations docu m q uestionnair e xperience, o rrty Inspecti o p erty inspe c f interest w e r u ality Assur a and Author r dance with License for erative (Dai r uring its op e o ry agencies ns, and deco m e rgy Comm i e gulatory C o ntal Protect i f Natural R e nts. esent, the fa c e rations to 1 d spent fuel e ws ous employ earify infor m ded a combi n i dual and gr o h eir knowle dassessment

.h at ranged f r roximately 4 of the H S w hich was c e LACBW R mented on t h e completer s r by docum e o ns c tions were ere identifie d 2-5 a nce (QA) f iizations several Fe d LACBWR a r ylan d) to u s erating lifet i have provi d mmissionin g i ssion (AEC ommission (N i on Agency (e sources (W D c ility has be e 1 987, perm aoff-load wh i e es were pe r m ation gathe r n ation of q u oup intervie w d ge of and

a. A numbe r rom the site c 4 0 recollect i S A questio n completed v R during its o h e question n s, current o n ntation disc omade over d which wer e fi nding type d d eral and St a and support s e any quan t ime, and to ded oversig h g. These ag e C), NRC), (EPA), DNR), en operated u anent shutd o i ch was co m rformed to c red from th e uestionnaire s ws with se vassociation r of the per s constructio n i ons of int e n naire prog r voluntarily b operational n aire were c n-site work i o vered duri n r the cours e e subsequen t documents.

ate of Wisc o t ing Techni c t ity of radio aimplement d ht at LACB Wencies inclu d u nder NRC o wn for de c m pleted in 2 0 collect first-h e records th a s completed veral of the pwith the sy s s onnel inter v n period to s h e rest were l r a m. This by retired/se pyears. Wit h corroborate d i ng staff th a ng the recor d e of the H S tly docume n o nsin licens e c al Specific a active mate r d ecommissi o WR during s de: License DP R commissioni n 0 12. hand infor m at were revi eby a major i participants.

stems and s o v iewed poss h utdown. l ogged fro m consisted parated sta f h few excep t d either by l o a t had LAC B d s search.

SA develop m n ted in the H es and a tions r ial at o ning siting, R-45. n g in m ation e wed. ity of Key ource essed m the of a ff and tions, o gged BWR m ent. H SA.

La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.1.3.O LACB W Dairylan Mississi p b ordere d Mississi p LSE co m served a s confirm e road on tt h f oa n 1t ha l i The pla nChalmer s provide d LACB W 19 years defuelin g Operatin No. 56, d 333 irra dinto five Limited d ongoing shipped internals

Building removed undergr o Condens Water S y Building 2.1.4.I n Based o nnotificat i s e Boiling W Termination n 0 O perational WR was a 5 d. This sin g ppi River s o d on the n o ppi River a n m prising ap p s the RCA b e d to be sui t t he south si d h e land nort h orme r Geno a n operation a 75 feet fro m h e fenced IS Fsmall parce icensed site.

n t was one s Company d them with a W R achieve d until it wa s g was comp lg License D d ated Augu s diated fuel a s(5) dry cas k dismantlem e at LACB W for disposa lintact, and 2 , and shipp e , including t o und gas st o ate Storage ystem pump. n cidents n the revie w i ons, occurr e W ater Reacto r Plan Histor y 5 0 Megawat t gle unit, als o o uth of the o rth by the nd Highway proximately boundary d u table for un r de of the pla n h of the L A a Station #1 al 350 MWe m the LSE, FSI facility tl of land to t of a series was the or i a provisiona l d initial crit i s permanen t l eted on Jun e D PR-45, pu r st 4, 1987; a s semblies, w ks and trans fe e nt of shutd o W R since 19 9 l in June 2 0 29 control r o e d for disp o t he spent fu e o rage tanks

)Tank and s, heat exc h w of existin e nce report s r t Electric (o known as G Village o f Mississipp i 35. The lic1.5 acres o f uring opera t restricte d us n t. Other pr o ACBWR pla n(G-1) coal (fossil gene r that is locat e t he east of Hof demons t iginal licen s l operating l i cality on J u t ly shut do w e 11, 1987.

rsuant to 1 0 a nd a posse s w hich were i ferred to the o wn and un u 94. Waste s 007. The R ods in place o sal in Jun e e l storage ra c); Condens acondense r);angers, pipi n g plant rec o s , and quest i 2-6 (MWe) Boi l G enoa Stati o f Genoa, V e i River an densed site c the license d t ions. Mat ee before rel ominent fea t nt, includin g (and later oi l rating statio n ed directly s o H ighway 35, t ration plan t s ee; the AE Cicense.

uly 11, 196 7 wn by Dair y The Dairyl a 0 CFR 50, w s s but not-o p i n Fuel Ele m site's ISFSI used system s stored in th e R eactor Preswas filled w e 2007. Ot h cks, Gaseo u ate system Turbine a n n g and com p o rds (e.g. a n i onnaires), i ling Water on #2, is lo c e rnon Cou n d a narrow omprises a t d site. The e rial leavin gease. The s t ures on the g the site s w l) fueled po w n (G-3) loc a outh of G-3

, across fro m ts funded i n C later sol d 7 , and was y land on A p a nd authorit y was termina t perate statu s m ent Storag e by Septem b s and waste e FESW an d sure Vessel w ith concre t h er syste m s us Waste Di s and Feedw a n d Generat o ponents tha t n nual and s incidents w i Reacto r t h cated on the nty, Wiscon s strip of l a t otal of 163 LSE bound a g the LSE w site is acces site include

w itchyard a n w er plant (re a ted south a n , and m LACBWR n part by A d the plant t operated f o pril 30, 198 y to operate a ted by Lic e s was grant e e Well (FE S b e r 2012. disposal op d other Cla s (RPV) wi t te, removed and comp o s posal Syste mater syste m o r; and Co m t were locat e semi-annual i th radiolog i h at is own eeast shore o s in. The s a nd betwee n.5 acres, wi t ary is fence d w as surveye dsed by an a: n d the site o moved in 1 9 n d approxi mthat is part o AEC. The A t o Dairylan d o r approxi m 7. Final r e LACBWR u ense Amen d e d by NRC.

SW), were p erations has ss B/C wast e t h head inst afrom the R e o nents have m (except f o m (except f o mponent C o e d in the T ureports, lic e ical or haza r ed by o f the ite is n the t h the d an d d and access of the 9 89), mately of the A llis-d and m ately eactor u nder dment The placed been e was alled, eactor been or the or the ooling urbine e nsee r dous La Cros s License T Revisio nmaterial placing t the LSE the struc t LSE, wh Special Monitor i reports c shutdow n around t h posing a of LAC Bcontami n 2.1.4.1.The his t involvin g potential chronol oT f lI n WI n s uI n d s tO t h 8O t h 8O a p I nO i n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 implicatio n t he reactor i n and, while c t ures and so i ch is alrea demphasis w i ng Reports c overing th e n in 1987.

he plant sit esignificant p BWR site nation from s Radi o t orical revi e g system le a to affect th gical orde r a The stainless l oo r. Incide n ncidents inv W ater Disch a n 1970, po t u ppression o n Septem becontamina t team cleani n On Novemb e h e potential 0-84 Incide n On Novemb e he Turbine B7, ORC 9 O n Decem b pproximatel y ncident Rep o On Decembe r nto the Turb i W ater Reacto r Plan ns occurred n a SAFST O c ontributing ils directly r d y known to was placed o(REMP), fo e periods oAvailable s a e were also p robability oland areas system failu r o logical Spil l e w indicate d akages, radi o e classificat i as follows; steel liner nts involvin g olving leak a a rge line we r t entially co n o n the licens e ber, 1977, t ion of a F o n g tank in th e er 5, 1980, pfor leakage n t Report, O R er 24, 1980, B uilding. (D 9 7, LER 80-b e r 6, 1980 y 1/2 gallon o rt, ORC-8 0 r 15, 1980, t ine Buildin g r between t h O R conditioto the radio l related to th e be "impact e o n obtainin fo cusing on o f SAFSTO R ampling res u reviewed.

T of impactin gand struct u res resultin g l s d that betw e ological spil l i on of LAC B in the FES W g leakage o f age from th e r e noted fro m ntaminated e d site road s removabl e orced Circul e Reactor B uartial block a of drain w a R C-80-71, Oresidual ra d D PC-80-93 I-12) , the Tur b of waste w 0-71, ORC-8 t he Turbine g Basement T 2-7 he commen c n in 1987.

l ogical cont a e operation o e d". g and revi e gaseous a n R and dec o u lts associa t T he objecti v g the radiol o u res. The s g in airborne e en 1967 a l s, an d/or ra d B WR struct u W had a hi s fthe FESW w e resin rege n m 1967 to 1 9 Control Ro d s. e alpha cation Pump u il d ing 701 f a ge of drain ater into the O RC-80-75, d ioactive co n Incident Re p b ine Buil d water to the 0-75, ORC-B uilding W a T unnel. (D P cement of pAll of thes e amination a n of the react o e wing the a n d liquid re l ommissioni n t ed with so i ve was the i ogical status s e included releases, li q a nd 1987, t h d ioactive li q ures or soil s story of lea k w ere noted f n eration wa s 9 73. d Drive (C contaminati o(FCP) dur i foot elevati o lines under soil under t h ORC-80-8 7ntaminatio n p ort, ORC-8 ding Waste Turbine B u 80-87, OR C aste Water T P C-80-106 I n p lant operat i e incidents t n d potential or , were co n a nnual Rad i l eases since ng activitie s i l and grou n identificatio n or hazardo usystem, s t quid spills o r h ere were s q uid effluent

s. The inci d k age to the R from 1967 t o ste system t C RD) oil w a o n was d ing mainten o n. (ORC, 0Turbine B u h e Turbine B 7 , ORC-80-9 n was detect 8 0-71, ORC-Water T uilding floo r C-80-97) T ank overfl o n cident Rep o i on in 196 7 took place wcontaminat i n tained with i ioactive Ef f 1967, incl u s after the n dwater wit h n of those e us material s tructure, or r releases.

several inc ireleases wi t dents are lis t R eactor Bu i o 2012. t o the Circu l a s used for d etecte d d ance invol v 0 9/27/77) u ilding resul t B uilding. (D 9 7) e d in soils u-80-75, OR C T ank overfl

r. (DPC-8 0 o wed waste w o rt) 7 and w ithin ion of i n the f luent u ding plant h in or e vents status area idents t h the ted in i lding lating dust d uring ving a t ed in D PC-u nder C-80-owed 0-102 w ater La Cros s License T Revisio nI n w DO u nO c o i nO s i c o B t oO a p b 2.1.4.2.Between release o ranged f r and fuel impacte dpolicies releases.

2.1.5.F LACB W within it s b een im p post op e Survey f ofor fissi o Structur e Turbine Stack. I n to be dir e An area s support b various w s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ncidents inv o waste water t D ischarge li n O n January n specified v On May 31, ontaminate d nto the b ase m On July 02, 1 i ght flow s e ontaminate d B ay doo r. I n o an unrestri On July 16, pproximatel yasement flo o Che m 1967 and 2 0 of chemical s r om spills o foil from s y d buildings.

and proce d F indin g s an d W R was desi g s many syst e p acted due t e rational his o r SAFSTO R o n products t e s classified Building, W n addition t o ectly impact e s urrounding b uildings s u w arehouses a W ater Reacto r Plan o lving leak a t anks throu g n e were note d 30, 1981, volume of w a 1982, a lid d water and m ent. (DPC 1 982, appro x eal rupture t d water flo w n addition, a cted area. (D 1983, a lea k y 15,000 ga l o r. (LER 8 3 mical Spills 014, the HS A s and/or pot e f acids and c ystems and These spill s d ures for i d d Conclusio g ned with m u ems, compo n t o routine o p t ory of the R (7) identif i t o enter and ias "impac t W TB, Low S o the structu r e d by the o p the LSE ha u ch as the L a nd storage b r a ge of poten t g h the norm a d from 198 0the Turbin a te r into the seal failed ospent resin 51 Inci d ximately 1, 2 o the Turbi n wed into the approximate l D PC-82-58 I k in the Se a l lons of rea c 3-07) A documen t e ntially haz a caustics use d storage tan k s were cont r d entificatio n ns u ltiple boun d n ents, and s t p erations a n plant. Da i ied historic a impact reac t t ed" by the S pecific Ac t res, the soil s p eration of t h s also been d LACBWR C buildings.

2-8 tially conta m al effluent r e 0 to 1986. e Building laundry roo m o n a spent r onto the fl o d ent Report) 2 00 gallons o n e Buildin gsoils outsi d ly 25 gallon s Incident Re p al Water I nj ctor coolant t ed several i n ardous liqui d d in the pla n ks. A maj o r olled and r e n , control a d aries to co n tructures.

M nd maintena n i ryland LA C al failed fuel t or and supp operation o tivity (LSA

)s surroundin g his facility.

T designated a rib House, L m inated liqu ielease path wWaste W m. (DPC-8 1 r esin liner w o or of the S o f condensa t g floor, and de the Turbi s of conta m p ort, LER 8 2 nj ection Sys t to be disch a ncidents in v ds to the e n n t's various ority of the emediated i n and remedi a n trol and co n M any of thes e n ce activiti e C-TR-138, Iincidents a tort systems.

of the facili t) Building, g these buil dThis area is as impacted.

LACBWR A id from the T w ay to the C Water Tank 1-10 Incide n w hich result e S pent Resin t e water wa sapproximat e ine Buildin g minated liqui d 2-016) tem leak at arged to the v olving the u nvironment. systems to tincidents o c n accordanc e ation of ha z ntain the ra d e systems a n e s during th e Initial Site t LACBWR t y include RWGTV, an d d ings have a defined by t This area i Administrat i Turbine Bu i Circulating W overflowe d n t Report) e d in the s p Liner Roo m s released f r ely 20 gall o g door and T d was disch a 1A FCP c aReactor Bu i u nplanned s p These inc i the spill of d ccurred insi d e with the s t z ardous m a d ioactive co n n d structures e operation a Characteri z and the pot e Reactor Bui l d the Venti l a lso been de the LSE fen c i ncludes an c ion Buildin g ilding W ater d and pill of m and rom a ons of T ruck a rged a used ilding p ill or i dents d iesel d e of tation a terial n tents have a l and zation e ntial lding, l ation emed c e. cillary g and La Cros s License T Revisio n In addit i support impacte d LSE wh i the LSE 2.1.6.I n As part ointo prel i and exis t 2.1.6.1.The enti rlarger p hclassific a efficient identifie d were cla s and are i d were cla scurrent c 2.1.6.2.The sur v or open l were del i radioacti vrelativel y appropri a The sur v Prior to accorda n sizes for The dec osegment a the exce p any stru c survey u These o bvolume c In additi o the purp o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ion to the a buildings, t d to provide i ch is consi dareas comp r nitial Surv e o f the HSA p iminary sur v t ing survey d Surv e re 163.5 ac r h ysical secti o a tion. Sur v and practi c d in the are a s sified as "

n dentified in s sified as "i mlassificatio n Surv e vey areas we r land area th a i neated to p h vity to the e y compact s h ate for the s i vey units es t c haracteriz a nce with the g survey unit s ommissioni n ation, remo v p tion of stru cture will r e u nits have b e bjectives in c c ontained o n o n, the surv e o se of char a W ater Reacto r Plan area within t he open la n a buffer zo n d ered non-i m r ising appro x ey Areas/U n process, the i vey areas a n data. y Areas r es licensed ons of the si t v ey area siz e cal size nee d a. Survey a r on-impacte d the HSA.

S m pacted."

F ns by area.

y Units re further di a t is survey e hysical area s e xtent practi hapes and hi ite operatio n tablished by a tion, surve y g uidance pr o s for FSS.

n g approach v al and disp o cture base m emain at si t een establis h c lude provi d nsite, and di s ey units esta b a cterization p r the LSE a n nd immedi a n e between t mpacted. T h ximately 1.5 n its and Cla s impacted L A n d assigned site was di v te that may e was dete r d ed to bou n r eas that ha v d". These a r S urvey areas F igure 2-1 pvided into s u ed and eval u s with simil acal. To the ghly irregul a n al history o r the HSA w y unit sizes f o vided in Mthat will b e o sal of all i m m ent floors a n t e closure a hed for stru c d ing survey d s position op t b lished for s p lanning an d 2-9 n d the open ately surrou n t he LSE an d h e licensed sacres of th e ssification A CBWR str uarea classif i vided into s u contain one rmined bas e nd the later a ve no reason r eas have n o with reaso n provides an i u rvey units.

uated as a si n ar operation a extent prac ar shapes w e r the site top w ere used as for Class 1 o ARSSIM, s e e implemen t m pacted sy s nd walls tha t a nd consequ ctures to fa c d ata for re m tions for the structures th a d do not co rland areas u nding the L d the G-3 la n site compris e e owner con t u ctures and o i cations bas e urvey areas

.or more su r e d upon the al and vert i n able potenti o radiologic a n able potent i i llustration o A survey u ngle entity f a l history or ctical, surve y e re avoided u ography. initial surv e o pen land s u e ction 4.6 f o ted at LAC B stems and a b t reside 3 fe e uently, be s u cilitate othe r m ediation pl a waste. a t are 3 feet r respond to surroundin L SE fence n d and faci l e s a total o f trolled area.

open land a r e d on the o

p. Survey a r r vey units d especific a r i cal extent oal for resid u al impact fr o ial for resid u of the LAC B unit is a por t f ollowing F Rsimilar pot e y units wer eunless the u n e y units for urvey units o r the sugge s B WR calls b ove-grade e t below gr a u bjected to r characteri z a nning, esti m below grad e the survey u g the LAC B is designat e l ities south o f 163.5 acre s reas were di v p erational h i r eas are typ i e pending o n r ea and the of contami n ual contami n om site oper a ual contami n B WR site a n t ion of a str u R S. Survey ential for re s e establishe d n usual shap echaracteriz a were adjus t s ted physica l for the co mstructures.

a de, no port i FRS. Ho w zation objec m ating the w e are intend e u nits that w BWR e d as of the s with vided istory ically n their most nation n ation ations nation n d the ucture units sidual d with e was ation. ted in l area m plete With i on of w ever, tives. w aste e d for w ill be La Cros s License T Revisio n used for section 5 Tables 2-impacte dsite stru c 2.1.6.3.The foll oReac tTurb i (L10LSA Nort h The basi s soil by r spills of package s Based o n subsurfa c the unre s 2.1.6.4.The foll oLAC B (L20G-3 C (L20 Based u p surveys p radioacti v Class 2 o 2.1.6.5.

The foll oNort hTran sPlan t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 the FRS o.5.2 of Cha p-1 and 2-2 p d structures c tures. A su m Class o wing open l t or Buildin g i ne Buildi n10102), Building, M h LSE Area s for this cl a radioactive mradioactive s and contai n n an assess m ce soils in t h stricted use c Class o wing open l BWR Ad m11101), Crib House, 11102). p on a revie w performed i n ve contami n o pen land su r Class o wing open l h End of Li c smission S w t Access, IS F W ater Reacto r Plan f remainin g p te r 5). provi d e a d e respectivel y mmary of t h 1 Open La n land areas h a g, WTB, W G n g, Turbine Maintenance (L1010104) assification i s material in tliquids an d ners. m ent of histo r h ese areas c criteria. Cla s 2 Open La n land areas w ministration LACBWR w of the his t n these are a n ation to exc r vey units a r 3 Open La n land areas w c ensed Site (L witchyard Ar e F SI Haul Ro r g below gra d etailed list o y. Figure 2-2 he survey un i n d Areas a ve been cl a G TV, Ventil aOffice B uEat Shack G. s due to a se these areas d resins, rad i rical incide n c ould possib l s s 1 open la n n d Areas were classifi e Building, Circ. Water t orical infor m a s as docum eeed the unr e r e shown on n d Areas were classifi e L 3012101), e a (L30121 0 ad Grounds 2-10 d e structur e of the surve y 2 provides a i t classificat i assified as i m ation Stack G uilding, 1B G rounds (L1 0 ries of docu m during facil ioactive sys nts and even t l y contain r e n d survey u n ed as impact e LACBW R Discharge L m ation and e nted in the estricted rel e Figure 2-1.

ed as Class 3 0 2), (L3012109)e s (designat e y units for b a detailed i n i ons are pre s mpacted Cla s G rounds (L1 Diesel G 0 10103), mented inci d l ity operatio n stem leakag e ts, it was a n e sidual radi o n its are sho w e d Class 2:

R Crib H o Line, Area S operational HSA, ther e e ase criteria.

). e d as STS a b oth the op e n ventory of s ented as fo l ss 1: 010101), Generator B u dents of the ns. These i e , and stora g nticipated th a oactive mat e w n on Figur e o use, War e South of LS E ra d iation a n e was a pot e a nd discuss en land area the buildin g l lows. u ilding Gr o contaminat i i ncidents in g e of radio a at the surfac e rial in exc e e 2-1. e house Gr o E Fence Gr o nd contami n ential for re s ed in s and g and ounds i on of clude active e and e ss of ounds o unds n ation s idual La Cros s License T Revisio n Historic a in conce n Class 3 o 2.1.6.6.Based o nin the H Scontami nG-3 CCoal Cap pGro uHwy The non-2.1.6.7.

The foll o structure These st r radioacti v radioacti vmajority Reac tWas tVent iWas tTurb iDies eLSA Mai n Through o spread o were ro u structure structura b elow g r subjecte d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 al informati o ntrations in e o pen land su r Non-I n a review o S A, the bal a n ation and h a C oal Plant GPile Groun d ped Ash Imp u nds East of H 35/Railroa d-impacted o p Class o wing is a l is. The co m r uctures co n v e waste s y ve material of the curre n t or Buildin g te Treatmen t ilation Stac k t e Gas Tank i ne Buildin g el Generato r Building (B n tenance Eat out facility of loose sur f u tinely pos t s involves l material a s r ade, no po r d to FRS. T h W ater Reacto r Plan o n containe d e xcess of th e r vey units a r Impacted O p f the operat i ance of the a s b een desi g G rounds (L4 0 d s (L401210 oundment G H ighway 3 5 d Right of W p en land sur v 1 Structure s ist of the m mplete list o f ntain the nu c ystems, and nwas routin e n t radioacti v g (B1010001 t Building (B k (B101000 3Vault (B10 1 g (B101000 5 r Building (B B 1010007) Shack (B1 0 o perations, t h f ace contam t ed as con tthe compl e s waste. W i rtion of the h e Class 1 s t r d in the HS A e unrestricte d r e shown on p en Land Ar e i ng history o163.5 acre l i gnated as n o 0 12103) 5) G rounds (L4 0 5 (L4012107 W ay Grounds vey units ar e s m ajor buildi n f all impac t c lear reacto r n uclear fue l e ly handled

, v e material i n) B 1010002) 3) 1 0004) 5) B 1010006) 0 10008) hese structu r ination, an d taminated a ete segmen t i th the exce p se structure tructural sur v 2-11 A indicate d t h d release cri Figure 2-1.

eas of the facilit y icensed site o n-impacted

.0 12106) ) (L4012108)e shown on F n gs that wer e t e d structur a r, primary r e l handling a

, transferre d n ventory at L res were su b d airborne r a areas. The tation, rem o p tion of str u s will rem a vey units ar e hat the pres e teria was n o y and histo r h as no rea s. ) Figure 2-1.

e initially c l a l survey u n e actor syste m a nd storage s d , and store d LACBWR r b jected to sp i adioactive m decommis o val, and d u ctural floor a in at site c l e depicted i n e nce of resi d ot expected.

rical inciden t s onable pot e lassified as n its is provi d ms, reactor systems. D d within th e resides in th eills of radio a m aterial. S t sioning ap p d isposal of s and walls l osure and a n Figure 2-1 d ual radioa c ts as docum ential for re simpacted C l ded in Tabl e support sys uring opera t ese building ese structur e active liqui d tructural su r proach for all system sthat reside 3 are therefor. c tivity ented sidual lass 1 e 2-2. tems, t ions, s. A e s: d s, the rfaces these s and 3 feet r e not La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.1.6.8.The foll o Class 2 ocomplet eLAC BG-3 CLAC BLAC BLAC BLAC BBac kTran sG-1 CBarg e These st r structure LACB W Washin g structure Adminis t the deco m LACB W structure The LA C Switch H unrestric t Supple m Manual depicted Based o n in the H section 2 residual the G-3 C 2.2.C From O c accorda n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Class o wing is a l i or 3 structu r e list of all i m BWR Crib H C rib House (BWR Admi BWR Ware h BWR Ware h BWR Ware h k-up Control smission Su b C rib House (e Washing B r uctures did s associate d W R worke r s g Break Roo ms because t h t ration buil d mmissionin g WR Class 2 o rs will remai n CBWR Ad m H ouse will n ted release m ent 1, M ult i(MARSAM in Figure 2

-n a review o HSA, cou p 2.3.5), the bucontaminati o C rib House, C haracteriz a c tober 2014 nce with t h W ater Reacto r Plan 2 and 3 Str u ist of some r es. All ar e mpacted str u H ouse (B20 1 (B2010102) nistration B u h ouse #1 (B 2 h ouse #2 (B 2 h ouse #3 (B 2 Center (B3 0 b-Station S w (B3012103)

Break Room not routinel y d with LA Cand therefo m were not a hey reside i ding, the G-3 g approach c r 3 systems n at site clo s ministration b n ot be subj using a g r i-Agency R a E) (8). Th e-1. f the operat i pled with t u ildings as s o n and hav ewill remain a tion Appr o through Au g h e Charact e r uctures of the majo r e located w i uctural surve 1 0101) u ilding (B2 0 2 010104) 2 010105) 2 010106) 0 12101) w itch House (B3012104)y house rad i C BWR liste d re consider e associated w i n a Class 3 3 Crib Hou s calls for the and structu r sure and the r b uilding, th eected to F R raded surve y a diation Su r e Class 2 a n i ng history o t he results s ociated wit h e b een desi gintact and f u o ach g ust 2015, s e rization S u 2-12 r buildings t ithin the lic e y units is pr o 0 10103) (B3012102)) i oactive sys t d above are ed Class 2 w ith LACB W 3 land area.

se and the Tcomplete s e ral material a refore will n e G-3 Crib H R S. Instea d y approach rvey and A s nd Class 3 s of the facilit yof charac t h the G-3 s gnated as n o unctional fo r s ite charact e urvey Plan.

t hat were i n ensed site b ovided in T a) tems or mat eoutside of or 3. The W R operatio n With the Transmissio n egmentation

, as waste or ot be subjec H ouse and t h d, these str u using the s sessment of structural s u y and histo r terization s u station have on-impacted

.r G-3 powe r e rization of L The C h n itially class i b ut outside o a ble 2-2. e rials durin g the LSE b u G-1 Crib H ns but are c o exception o n Sub-Stati o , removal, a n salvage. N oted to FRS.

he Transmi s uctures will guidance o of Material s urvey units rical inciden t urveys (as no reason a. The G-3 s r operations.

LACBWR w h aracterizati o ified as imp o f the LSE.

g operations.

u t were us e H ouse and B o nsidered C l of the LAC B o n Switch H n d disposal o portion of s sion Sub-S t be surveye f NUREG-s and Equi pfor buildin g ts as docum summariz e a ble potenti a station, incl u w as perfor m on Survey p acted The The e d by B arge l ass 3 B WR H ouse, of all these t ation d for 1575, p ment g s are ented ed in al for u ding med in Plan La Cros s License T Revisio n incorpor adocume n develop e executin g procedu r safely a n Charact e objectiv eProv iDev eSupp volu m The dec o b uilding s characte r subjecte dremoved 1757, A p The cha r subsurfa c structura surveys w structure used to m above g r of the e x planned, planning A signif i unit is cl a design f o result in unit mee terrors. As site-s LACB W selected.

in NUR E Paramet e assess th e s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ated the pr e n ted in the s u e d to provid e g characteri z r es and sur v n d effectivel y rization dat a e s: i de radiolog i e lop the req uort the ev a m es. ommissioni n s, structures

, rization eff o d to FRS.

E prior to th e p pendix O.

racterizatio n ce soils, pa v l basement s w ere perfor ms. Upon co m m ake deter m r ade or subg x pected en d-executed a

n. icant questi o assified cor r o r FRS. A a survey de s ts the releas e pecific Der i WR at the ti m The scree n EG/CR-551 2 e r Analysis e correct cl a W ater Reacto r Plan evious hist o urvey areas e guidance a zation surve y ey unit spe c y acquire th e a acquired t h ical inputs n uired inputs f aluation of r n g approach

, and comp o orts focuse d E xtensive c h e performan c n surveys f o ved surfaces

, s that will r e m ed in the L m pletion, th e m inations on wrade struct u-state struct u nd docume n on that must r ectly. The a classificati o s ign that do e e criteria. I n i ved Conce n m e the char a n ing DCGL s 2 Volume 3(9), Table 6 a ssification o r or ical oper afrom the H S a nd directio n y activities.

cific survey e requisite c h h rough the e necessary fo r f or LTP, an d remediation for LACB W onents to a d d on open h aracterizati o c e of final s o cused on g , and concre t emain in th e LACBWR A d e data was a w hether ad d u res, surface ures at LA C n ted with th e be answer e a ppropriate c o n which u n e s not obtai n n some case s n tration Gui d a cterization s presented i , Residual R.91 (P crit = 0 of impacted o 2-13 a tional and S A and pre v n to the per s The Plan winstruction s h aracterizati e xecution of r the design o d alternative s WR calls for t d epth of at lland areas o n of equip m s urveys is n o g eneral ope n t e pads. Co e en d-state dministratio n ssessed for q ditional char a and subsur f C BWR. Co n e same data e d by the ch a classificatio n nderestimat e n adequate i n s, this can i n deline Leve lsurvey was i n NUREG-1 R adioactive 0.10) for soi l o pen land o rradiologica l vious site ch s onnel resp o w orked in co s (sample p lon data. the Plan w a of FRS, s and tech nthe demolit i least 3 feet band remai nment, syste m ot required i n land area s o ncrete core condition.

n Building a q uality and a a cterization face soils, o r n tinuing ch a quality an d aracterizati o n of a surve y e s the pote n nformation t o n crease the p l s (DCGLs)performe d , 1757 and th Contamin a l s were use d r soil survey l informati o aracterizati o onsible for i m njunction w l ans) that w as used to m n ologies an d i on and rem o below grad e n ing struct u ms or struc t in accordan c s including: samples we rIn addition

, a nd several o adequacy.

T data is req u r beneath t h aracterizatio n d the results on is wheth e y unit is cri t n tial for con o demonstr a potential for m were not y e alternate a ce concentra t ation from D d as alternat units. o n collecte d on efforts. I mplementin g with implem e were develo p meet three pr i d estimate w oval of all o n e. Consequ e u res that w i tures that w c e with NU R site surfac e re taken fro m , characteri z of the G-3 s t T he data wa s uired, primar h e concrete f n surveys wincluded i n er or not a s u tical to the s u tamination c ate that the s u m aking dec i et establish e c tion levels tion values f D ecommissi o e action lev e d and t was g and e nting ped to imary w aste n-site e ntly, ill be ill be R EG-e and m the zation tation s then ily of f loors will be n FRS u rvey urvey c ould urvey isions e d for were f ound oning els to La Cros s License T Revisio n For stru c to eval u 7,100 dp m Appendi x radionuc the cons e for Cs-1 3 2.2.1.D DQOs w FRS. H oto deter m unrestric tinspecti onature, e applicab l Charact eoutlined 1)State 2)Iden t 3)Iden t 4)Defi n 5)Dev e 6)Spec i 7)Opti m The DQ O collect.

N and will assessm e obtainin g obtained Direct mMinimal that exh i Detect (H 2.2.2.S Charact e approve d approac h s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ctures, the g r ate the cla s m/100c m 2 t o x H. Use o f lide distrib u e rvative app r 3 7 is signifi c D ata Qualit y were implem e owever, the m ine the ra d ted use cri t o ns and sur v xtent and r a le structures rization sur v in MARSSI Mthe proble m t ify the deci s t ify inputs t o n e the study elop a decisi o ify limits o n m ize the des O s for site N o structur e therefore n o e nt of concr e g core sam pto determi n measurement Detectable i bited the h i H TD) radio n urve y Desi g rization su r d procedure s h based upo n W ater Reacto r Plan r oss screeni n ssification o o tal gross b e f the Co-60 ution for sur f r oach was t o c antly great e y Ob j ective s e nted for c h goal of cha rionuclide m teria to de m veys of su ff a nge of radi o , residues, s o veys were d e M , Append i m , sion, o the decisio nboundaries, on rule, n decision er r ign for obta i characteriz a es located a b o t b e subject e te in base m p les. Soils ne the mean s and scan sConcentrati ighest activ i nuclide(s).

g n rveys were s and the Ch a n the DQOs f r n g level tha t o f survey u e t a-gamma sscreening v f ace conta m o assume a d er. s h aracterizati o r acterizatio n mixture, whe r monstrate c o ff icient qual i o active con t o ils and sur f e signed to g i x D. The s e n , r ors, an d ining data.

a tion includ e bove 3 feet b ed to FRS.

m ents and s uwere samp land maxim u s of surfaceons (MDC) i ty were se n designed a a racterizati o f or each sur v 2-14 t was used d u nits was t h s urface acti v value was c o m ination wo u distribution o on surveys i n n is to quant i r eas the FR S ompliance w i ty and qu a tamination i n face water.

g ather the ap e ven steps i n ed identifyi n below grade Consequen t u rrounding s o led volume t um activity asoils were as will be e nt to an off

-a nd perfor m o n Survey Pl vey unit. F o during char a he nuclide-vity based o n o nservative a u ld be princ i o f 100% Co n a similar m ify and deli n S goal is co with 10 CF R antity were n each appl i propriate d a n the DQO d ng the type swill remai n tly, sample coils. Build i t rically. S u a s well as t hmade usin g employed f o-site labora t med in acc oan. Survey o r example, acterization a specific sc r n Co-60 fro m a s it was a n i pally Co-6 0-60 since th e manner as a n n eate conta m omparison o f R 20.1402. performed ticable surv e a ta using th e development s and quant i n following d c ollection w a i ng concret e ufficient me h e sample st a g the same o r FSS. Vo t ory for ana ordance wi t design inco ran open lan d as an action r eening val u m NUREG-nticipated th a 0 and Cs-13 7 e screening v n ticipated f o m inated are a f data again s Characteri z to determin ey unit, incl u e DQO proc e process are

ities of me d decommissi o a s focused o e was sampl easurements a ndard devi ainstrument slumetric sa mlysis of Ha r t h all appl i r porated a g r d survey un i level u e of 1757, a t the 7 and v alue or the as and s t the zation e the u ding e ss as : d ia to o ning o n the ed by were a tion. s and mples rd-to-icable raded it was La Cros s License T Revisio n designat e the unre s Class 1 s present.

to identi f Class 2 o survey mselect lo cmeasure m b iased s u unit. Adelineat e warrante survey u n The are a characte rS a l s uB s y FR a dS ASS a rSC PA L 2.2.2.1.The nu m b y asses s s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e d as Class stricted rele a s urvey unit f The survey fy the latera l or Class 3 r e measurement c ations for s ment and/or urvey desig n A biased ap p e the extent od if the cha r n it. as and mate r rization sur v urface scan s ll Class 1, 2 u rvey unit L B iased subsu r ystems of cigure 2-3.

Random sa m d dition, soil cans and s Administrati oamples wer ecans and sa m reas. cans and sa m C oncrete sa m iping and V A b ackgrou n LACBWR i nNum b mber of meas u sing the sa m W ater Reacto r Plan 1 because i t a se criteria.

f ocused on b design was l and vertic a e ceived sur vlocations a n static meas usample lo c n or a rando m proach was o f an area t h racterization ials survey e v ey included s and r ando m 2 , 3, and n o L 3012102 (i.

e r face soil s a oncern in C m ples were t asamples w eamples we r o n Building e taken fro m m ples were m ples were t m ples were t entillation t u nd radiation cluding: as p b er of Static urements a n p le size nec e r t may cont a Therefore, t b ounding th e based upo n al extent of t h v eys develo p nd scan area u rements an d cations at ra n m approach warranted h at requires effort was d e d and/or sa m: m and biase d on-impacted e., the switc h amples were Class 1 and a ken from a e re obtaine d re taken o n and the G-3 m the septic t a taken on L A t aken on G-3aken in the unnels. study was phalt, concre tMeasureme n nd/or sample e ssary to sa t 2-15 ain levels o f the characte r e contamina t n the numbe r he contami n ped to inclu d s. Biased s u d/or sample s n dom. The was addres s when the c remediatio n d esigned to v m pled in an d d surface an d open land a h yar d). taken alon g 2 areas inc l a sphalt and c directly bel o n accessible Coal Plant.

anks. A CBWR A d 3 Building abasement a rperformed te, and soil.

n ts and/or Ss that were t tisfy the DQ O f radiologic a rization sur v t ion where c r of measur e nation. Are a de a combi n urvey desig n s. Random e decision o f sed by the D c haracteriza t n. Alternati v verify the b a d around th e d subsurfac earea survey g side and un l uding the p c oncrete fro m o w the asph a e roof surf a dministratio n a ccess and h e reas of the Ron materia lamples t aken in eac h O s. al contamin a veys that we rontaminatio ements and a s classified n ation of ra n n s used kno w survey desi g f whether t o D QO proces s t ion effort w v ely, a rand o a sis for the c e licensed a r e soils sam p units with derneath un d p iping syste m pads and a lt to a one m a ce areas o f n Building s u eavily trave l R eactor Bui ls similar t o h survey un i a tion greate r re performe d n was pote nsamples re qas non-imp a ndom and b wn informat i g n selected o use prima r s for each s u w as design e om approac h classificatio n r ea as part o p les were ta k the excepti o d erground pms as sho w paved area m eter depth.

f the LAC B u rfaces and led surfaces.lding, WT B o those fou n it was deter m r than d in a n tially q uired a cted, b iased ion to static rily a urvey e d to h was n of a of the k en in o n of piping wn on s. In BWR drain B , and n d at m ined La Cros s License T Revisio n For the c that will and/or s a of resid u For the sample s vertical e For non-validate measure mtrivial le v generate d 2.2.2.2.For the c survey uSample l to speci fi that we r responsi b survey d radioacti v potential from the 2.2.2.3.Survey u area to b area sca n Supervis was giv e survey u n 2.2.2.4.The cha r (beta an d survey o f FRS co n and vol usamplin gfollowin g s e Boiling W Termination n 0 c haracteriza t be subject e amples take n al radioacti v characteriz a s ize was ba s e xtent of the impacted a nthe basis m ents and/o vels of lice n d radionucli d Deter m c haracteriza t n its that wi l l ocations w e ic locations w r e taken in b le Radiolo g d esign pro c v ity, depresspill locati oHSA aided Scan C u nits were s c b e scanned i n ned was c or and/or t h en to infor m n it. Type s r acterizatio n d gamma); s t f any concr e n sisted of a c umetric sam p g of surface g is a descri p W ater Reacto r Plan tion of imp a e d to FSS, t h n in the surv e ve contamin a a tion of Cla s ed upon th econtaminat i nd Class 3 o p of the cla s o r samples w n see-genera t d es are pres e m ination of t ion of non

-l l be subjec t ere determin w ithin the s u each surve g ical Protec t cess. Consions, disc o ons, or area sin the selec t C overage c anned to t h n each surv ontingent u pe Project H e mation from s of Measur e n survey of tatic beta m e e te and/or as combinatio n p les. The s u and subsur f p tion of the d r a cted Class 1 he minimu m ey units we r ation in the sss 1 structu r e necessary n ion. p en land su r s sification.

w as suffici e t ed radionu c e nt in non-i m Static Meas u-impacted a n t ed to FRS, e d by gener urvey unit.

Ty unit was t ion Super v sideration w olored areas

, s where the t ion of biase d h e extent pr ey unit was p on the pr o ealth Physic the initial w ements and S building su r easurement s phalt-paved n of surface urvey of th e face soil, se d d ifferent ty p 2-16 1 and Class m number o f re commens u survey unit.

res that wil n umber of s r vey units, t h Conseque n e nt to ensur e c lides are p r m pacted are a urement an d n d impacte d sample loc aating rando m T he locatio ndetermine d v isor and/or w as given , cracks, lo w ground ha s d locations.actical in a cdetermine d o fessional j uist during t h w alk downs Samples r faces cons i s , m aterial s a open land ascans (beta e open land diment and s pes of meas u 2 open lan d f random o r urate with t h l remain a n samples ne e he primary c n tly, the n u e with reas o resent in C l a s. d Sample L o d open land a tions were m pairs of c n of biased m d by the p r the Project to locatio n w point gra v s been distu r ccordance w d during the udgment of he survey d e and the a m i sted of a c o amples and s a reas that w i and gamm aareas consi ssurface wat e u rements an d d areas (pa v r biased dir e h e probabili t n d be subje c e ded to asse s c haracteriza tumber of sonable con f lass 3 areas ocations areas and C primarily c h oordinates t measuremen t r ofessional j Health Ph y ns that ex h v ity drain p rbed. Hist o w ith their cl asurvey des i the Radiol o e sign proces m bient radia t o mbination smears. Th e i ll remain a n a), static be t sted of gam m e r for isoto p d samples th a ved and unp a e ct measure m t y of the pre s cted to FR S ss the later a t ion DQO w systematic fidence that and no lic e Class 2 stru c hosen at ra nhat corresp o t s and/or sa m judgment o y sicist duri n hibit meas u p oints, actu a orical infor m a ssification.

i gn process.

o gical Prot es. Conside r t ion levels i of surface e characteri z nd be subjec t ta measure m m a scans a n pic analysis. at were utili z a ved) ments sence S , the al and w as to static only e nsee-ctural ndom. o nded m ples of the n g the u rable a l and m ation The The e ction r ation i n the scans zation ted to ments, n d the The zed.

La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.2.2.4.1Gamma activity.

used for Ludlum MLudlum M Scannin g rate not twas mai n and, loc a 2.2.2.4.2 Scannin g 7,100 dp mincludin g Hand-he l used.

Beta sca n and wit h prevente d was det ecalculat e of the su r If not i minstrume n evaluati o investig a 2.2.2.4.3 Direct m surfaces typically

detector s Direct m acquirin gtypically

designat e adjusted 2.2.2.4.4If applic verify l o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 .Gam m scans were Sodium io these scans.

M ode l 44-1 0 Model 44-1 0 g was perfo r t o exceed 0

.n tained wit h a tions of ele v.Beta S g was pe r m/100c m 2 a g , but not l i l d beta sci n n ning was p h a scannin g d scanning a e rmined, a n d a priori t o r vey. m pacted by h n t to identi o n. Any id e a tion and po t.Direc t measuremen t of the buil dperformed

s. measurement s g data over used for s u e d investiga t as appropri a.Rem o able, remo v o ose surfac e W ater Reacto r Plan ma Surface Sperformed odide (NaI) g Energy Sol 0 Detector 0 NaI detect o rmed by m o.5 m (20 in) hin 15 cm (6 vated direct l S urface Sca n rformed in a ction level.

imited to; f l n tillation an d performed w g speed of o a t the speci f n d the sca n o ensure tha t high ambien tfy location s e ntified area s t ential deco n t Measurem e t s were pe r dings or o nusing ~1 0 s were cond u a pre-deter m urface meas u tion level o r a te to achie v o vable Surfa c vable beta a n e contamin a r Scans o ver open l a gamma sci nutions Tech n Sensitivity (o rs to Co-6 0 oving the d e per second. in) of the s levels were f n s order to Beta scan s l oors, walls

, d/or gas-fl o with the dete o ne detecto r fied distanc e n ning techn i t the MDC f t noise level s of elevate s of elevate d ntamination.

e nts rformed to n concrete o 0 0 cm 2 or l u cted by pl a m ined cou n urements an d r MDC un d ve an accept a ce Contami n n d/or alpha ation is les s 2-17 and surfaces n tillation det n ical Suppo r (10) exami n 0 and Cs-13 7 e tector in a s The dista n u rface if po flagged for flocate ar s were perf o , ceilings, r o o w proporti octor positio n r active wi n e, the detec t i que adjust e f or scannin g s, technicia nd activity t h d contamin adetect total or asphalt p a arger size d acing the de t nt time. A d generally p er consider a a ble MDC f o nation contaminati s than the to identify t ectors (typi c r t Docu m en t n es the resp 7 when used serpentine p nce betwee n ssible. Au d f urther inve s reas of re s ormed over a o ofs, aspha l o nal detect o n maintaine d n dow per s e t ion sensiti v e d accordi n g was appro p ns monitore d t hat require a tion were m levels of a ved areas.scintillati o t ector near tcount time p rovided de t ation. The i or direct me aon or smea rapplicable locations o f cally 2" x 2 "t (TSD) RS

-onse and s c d for scannin g pattern, whi l n the detect o d ible signals stigation an dsidual acti v accessible s t l t and conc r o rs (typicall y d within 1 c econd. If s u v ity for the a ngly. Sca n priate for th e d the audibl further inv m arked or fl acontaminat i These me o n or gas-f l the surface t o of one to t t ection leve l instrument c asurements.

r surveys w action leve l f residual s u") were typ i-TD-31319 6 c an MDC o g surface so i l e advancin g or and the s uwere moni t d/or samplin g v ity above tructural su r r ete paved a y 126 cm 2) cm of the s u u rface cond i alternate di s n ning speed e stated obj e e response oestigation a a gged for f u i on on stru casurements l ow propor t o be counte d two minute s ls well belo w count times were perfor m l. A sme a u rface ically 6-006, of the ils. g at a u rface t ored; g. the rfaces areas. were u rface i tions stance was ective of the a nd/or u rther ctural were t ional d and s was w the were med to a r for La Cros s License T Revisio nremovab surfaces.

moderat eactivity a 2.2.2.4.5 Concret econtami n will rem adiamond 1/2-inch w pulveriz e 2.2.2.4.6Samples location s scannin g defined a split spo otools. Subsurf a hand au g survey u n 2.2.3.I n The radi provide bidentifie daction l e and exp e static m e Concern Commerperform

3) analy s Instrum e in Table 2.2.3.1.All data characte r s e Boiling W Termination n 0 le activity w A 100 c m e pressure.

S a s appropria t.Conc r e core borin g n ation and t h a in and be s ubit core dr i wide "puck s e d and anal y.Mate r of soil, sed s as well as

g. Surface s o as soil belo w on samplin g a ce soil was gers. Subsu r n it. n strument a ation detec t b oth reliabl e d for the d e e vels. Dete c e cted perfo r m easurements (ROC) at a cially avail a the three b a sis of materi a ntation and 2-3. Calib rloggers, as s rization we r W ater Reacto r Plan w as usually m 2 surface a Smears wer e te. rete and As p g and the s a h e presence u bjected to F ill. The co n s", represe n y zed for isot o rial Samplin g iment, and sother locati o o il is define d w the top 15 g system or, b sampled b y r face soil sa m ation Selecti o tion and me e operation a ecommissio n ctor selecti o m ance in th and scanni M DC of 50%able portabl e asic survey m al samples.

nominal M D ration s ociated det e re calibrate d r taken at ea c area was s a e then analy z p halt Core S a a mpling of of volume t F RS. Core b ncrete samp nting a ce r t a o pic content

.g sludge were ons in area s d as the top cm layer i n b y using ha n y direct pus h m pling was o n, Use an dasurement i a nd adequat e n ing of LA C on was base d e field. In ng were ca p% of the ap p e and labora t measuremen D C values t h e ctors, and a d on an ann u 2-18 c h direct m e ampled wit h zed for the p ampling concrete w e tric contami bore sampli n le produce d a in depth i

n. obtained fr s exhibiting 15 cm (6-i n n 1 m incre m n d trowels, b h sampling sperformed a d Minimum nstrumentat e sensitivity t C BWR at l e d on detect i all cases, t h p able of de t plicable acti o t ory instru mts: 1) surfa c h at were e m a ll other po r ual basis u s easurement l h a circular p resence of g ere used to nation in c o n g of concr e d by the cor i n to the sur f rom designe delevated ac t n ch) layer o f ments. Surf a b ucket auge r systems (e.

g a s necessar y Detectable t ion for cha rto detect th e evels suffic i i on sensitiv i he instrume n tecting the a on level. m ents and de t c e scanning; m ployed duri n rtable instru m sing Nation a l ocation on cloth or p a g ross beta a n assess the d o nc r ete wal l e te was acc o i ng was ty p f ace. Con c d biased an d t ivity that w f soil while s ace soil was r s, or other s g. GeoProbe y to add r ess t Concentra t racterizatio n e initial suit e i ently belo w ity, operati n n ts and dete c anticipated R tectors were 2) static m eng characte r m entation t h al Institute o non-asphal t aper filter, u n d/or gross d epth of su r l s and floor s omplished u s p ically slice d c rete pucks d random s a were identifi e subsurface scollected u s s uitable sa m) or by m t he DQOs f o tions (MD C n was selec t e of radionu c w the estab l ng character i ctors select e Radionucli dtypically u s easurement s rization are hat were us e o f Standard s t type using alpha rficial s that s ing a d into were ample e d by s oil is sing a m pling anual o r the C s) ted to c lides lished i stics, e d for d es of sed to s; and listed e d for s an d La Cros s License T Revisio n Technol o addresse d 2.2.3.2.The rece i used for portable characte r 2.2.4.LGamma proporti o laborato r quality p preparat i site labo r In all c a achieve d accepted analytic a laborato r 2.2.5.Q MARSS I used to quality fo 1576, Mu Regulat o through (12). F umay be achieve d The QA P used dur i function a All char a approve d audit a Charact e prescrib e applied contract o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 o gy (NIST) t d in the QA P Instr u ipt, inspecti ocharacteriz a radiologic a rization is a d L aborator y I spectrosco p o nal counti n r y in accord a programs of i on and anal y r atory under ases, analyt i d. The ana l methodolo g al methods ries used for Q ualit y Ass u I M, section demonstrat e for sample a n ulti-Agency R ory Guide 4

.Normal Op urthe r , MA R used in ad d d. P P was pre p i ng the site c al activities, acterization d procedure s a nd survei l rization sta f ed, implem e to any ap p o rs. W ater Reacto r Plan t raceable so u PP. ument Use a n o n, issue, co ation was p al instrume n ddressed in t h I nstrument py was pri m n g and liqui d ance with a p the contra c ysis of char athe QAPP.

ical method s l ysis of ra d gies or oth e employed characteriz a u rance 2.2 discuss e e that site c nalysis take n R adiologic a.15, Qualit y erations to R SSIM and dition to, o r p ared and i m c haracteriza t the DQO p r activities e s s. The eff e llance acti v f f and prog r e nted, and v plicable ser v r urces. The c n d Control ntrol, and a c performed i n n tation. T he QAPP. Methods a n marily perfo r d scintillati o p proved lab o cted off-site a cterization s s were esta b diological c o er compara band the l a a tion. es the need f c onditions a r n to suppor t a l Laborator y y Assurance License Te rMARLAP b r in lieu of, mplemented t t ion and FR S r ocess, and m ssential to d ective imple v ities, inc l ram self-as s v erified w h v ices provi d 2-19 calibration o c countabilit y n accordanc e T he issue a n d Sensitiv i rmed by t h o n analysis oratory proc e vendor lab o samples pro v blished to e ontaminants ble method o a boratory M f or a qualit y r e acceptab l t characteri z y Analytica l of Radiol o rmination)

-b oth indicat eexisting q u to ensure th S process.

T m easures ne c data quality wmentation o l uding fie l sessments, a h en deficien c d ed by off-of instrumen t y of portabl e e with issu e and contro l ities h e on-site r a was perfor m e dures. Ene r oratories th a vided the sa m e nsure that used stan d o logies. T a M DC achie v y system to le for unre s zation and F l Protocols M o gical Mon i- Effluent S t e that a Qu a uality syste me adequacy T he QAPP d e c essary to a c w e re imple m o f character i l d walk-d o a s appropria tcies were i-site vendo r t s used for c e radiologic a e and contr o l of instr u adiological m ed by an r gy Solution s at were use d me level of required M d ard approv e able 2-4 pro v v ed by the ensure the a s tricted rele F RS is discu M anual (M A itoring Pro g t reams and ality Assur a ms to ensu rof data bei n e scribes pol i chieve quali t m ented and ization was o wns by t e. Correc t identified.

rs, as well c haracterizat i al instrumen t ol procedur e uments use dlaboratory.

approved v e s ensured th a d for the re c quality as t h M DC values e d and gen e vides the t yoff-site v e a dequacy o f ase. Labo rssed in NU R ARLAP) (11 g rams (Inc epthe Enviro n ance Project r e data qual n g develope d i cy, organiz a t y data. performed u verified th r Energy Sol u tive actions These me a as on-site i on is tation es for d for Gas e ndor a t the ceipt, he on-were erally y pical e ndor f data r atory R EG-) and eption n ment Plan ity is d and a tion, u sing r ough utions were a sures sub-La Cros s License T Revisio n The Ch a quality a and is s ufollows: E o pA s tD Details o the proc e data acq u require mPEPSPM p r All char a Plan, the 2.3.S In Octo b placing t October characte r accelera t Energy S o October 9 August 6docume n Charact e PN-164 0 2015 Fi e Radioac t characte r characte r s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a racterizatio n assurance an d ubject to the Establishme n perations.

A ctions to e n t aff. Documentati o o f the QA/Q C e dures and s uisition an d m ents. The s p ersonnel qu a E xecution in roper docu m election of a roper instru m Management r ocedures, p acterization QAPP, all a ummar y o f ber of 2005, the unit int o of 2014, r ization of L t ion of de o lutions in a 9, 2014. T 6, 2015. Th e n ted in tw o e rization Su r 0 17-001, LA e ld Work (1 4 t ive system s r ization dat r ization has W ater Reacto r Plan n Survey P l d quality c o QAPP. Th e nt/implemen t nsure that th e o n of the da t C elements s sample plan d recording p ecific QA/

Q alifications, accordance m entation of a ppropriate i ment calibr a oversight o f protocols, anactivities w applicable i m f Character i Dairyland p o a SAFST ODairyland LACBWR i n commissio n accordance w T he schedul e e results of t h o separate r vey Report CBWR Rad i 4). s that rem aa in certai n been deferr e r l an was de v o ntrol (QA/

Q e QA/QC p r t ation of pla n e procedures t a collected.

s pecific to c hinstructions was guide d Q C progra mexperience, with appro v survey data instruments t a tion and da i f characteri zd document a w ere conduc t mplementin g ization Sur v performed a O R conditio ncontracted n anticipatio n ning activit i w ith Energy S ed Energy S he site char areports, G Gfor Octobe r i ological C h a in at LA C n areas d u ed until suc h 2-20 veloped acc o Q C) progra mogram ele m n s, procedu r are underst o h aracterizat

i. The char a d and cond u m component and trainin g v ed procedu rand sample to perform t h ily function a zation activi t a tion requir e t ed in acco r g procedures v e y Results limited ch a n. This su r Energy So l n of the dev e ies. Cha r S olutions ch a S olutions si t acterization s G-EO-3131 9 r and Nove m h aracterizat i CBWR affe c ue to ambi e h time that r a ording to t h m for the de c m ents applic a r es, and pro t o od and foll i on are pres e a cterization o u cted in co m s for site ch a g. r es. analyses.

h e surveys.

al checks.

t ies relative t ements. r dance with , and appro v a racterizatio n rvey is doc u l utions to elopment o f racterizatio n aracterizati o t e character i s urveys per f 9 6-RS-RP-0 m ber 2014 F i on Survey R cted the ab e nt radiatioadiological o h e essential commission i able to char a t ocols for th e l owed by th e ented in the Q o perations a n m pliance w i a racterizati o to the adher e the Charac t ved sample p n survey of umented in perform a f this LTP a n n activities, o n procedur e ization eff o f ormed by E n 01, LACB W Field Work (Report for J ility to ac q o n levels.

o r physical celements o i ng of LAC B acterization a e field e implement i QAPP, as w nd the asso c ith these Q A o n are as foll ence to terization S u plan instructthe LSE pr i Reference 7 a more de t nd the antici p , performe d es commenc e o rt conclud e nergy Soluti o W R R adiol o(13) and L C J une thru A quire mean iIn these c c onditions w of the BWR a re as i ng w ell as ciated A/QC ows: urvey ions. ior to 7. In tailed pated d by e d on e d on o ns is o gical C-RS-ugust ingful cases, would La Cros s License T Revisio n allow th e the deco m significa n b y revisi o 2.3.1.B During t backgro u acquired b ackgro u As part o b ackgro u LACB WNormall y be repre ssite area Supervis appropri a results.

were co n Concret eis locate dnon-imp a approxi m unit L40 L40121 0samples a The ana b ackgro u can be a tmean Cs 0.135 p C was 0.07 Relevan tStation (Z at Zion S Zion to C geograp hfor dist u b ackgro u within t hcategori e drainage s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e survey of t mmissionin g nt additiona o n or adden d B ack g round t he initial c h u nd study f ofrom vari o u nd study is o f the 2014 u nd levels a W R fell withi n y , backg r ou n sentative.

H was chosen

.or selected a a te for obtai n Although t h n sidered una f e samples a n d north of t h a cte d surve y mately 100 s 12108. Soi l 0 8 were also a re provide d l ysis of th e u nd study f o ttributed to g-137 conce n C i/g with a m 0 resulting i t to LACB W ZNPS) title d S tation (15). C s-137 leve hically simil a u rbed soils a u nd Cs-137 h e expecte d es of soil in and non-dr a W ater Reacto r Plan hese survey g process, i nl characteri z dum as a pa r Stud y h aracterizati or soils at L A o us locatio nsummarize d characteriz a a t LACBW R n nominal e x n d reference H owever, no

. The Ener g a n area out s n ing backgr o he selected s f fected by p a nd direct me h e LSE. A y unit L401 2quare mete r l samples fr oevaluated f d in sections e backgrou n o r soils. Th e global fallo u n tration of s maximum o b i n the uppe r WR is a stud y d Zion Soluti o This docu mls anticipat e a r. The doc u as well as ulevels for t h range of d the non-i m ainage, dist u r units. Solu n cluding fol l zation data i rt of the req u on survey p A CBWR. R n s outside o d in Table 2-ation effort, R. The pu r x pected lev e areas shoul suitable of f g y Solutions P side of the L ound measu sample loca t ast LACB Wasurements sphalt sam p 2 106. Surf a r s of undist u om non-im p f or use as b a2.3.3 and 2

.nd soil sa m e results di d u t. For the t s u r face sam p b served co n r range for t h y performed o ns TSD 13 m ent was p r ed from wo r ument predi c undisturbed he site spec i d isturbed so m pacted area u rbed and u n 2-21 tions intend s l owing the s is obtained, u ired 2 year performed i n R eference 7 of the own e5. Energy Solu r pose of th e els for soils, d be reason a f-site locati o P roject Heal L SE but on rements bas tions were i W R operatio n were taken p les and dir e a ce soil sam p u rbed non-d r p acte d surve y a ckground r e.3.5.3. m ples in 20 1 d report Cs-1 t wo backgro u p les taken o n centration o his data set afor the dec o-004, Exam i r epared to c o rldwide fall c ted ranges f s oils and is fic backgro u ils in non-d s at LACB W n disturbed s o s to continu e s ubmittal of this chapte r update of t h n Octobe r 2states that a e r controlle d utions perfo r e study wa s concrete, a n a bly close t o o n was iden t lth Physicist the license d ed upon the inside the L A ns. in Class 3 s ect measure m p les were a c rainage soil y units L40 1 e ference soi l 14 compar e 1 37 at level s und studies n or aroun d o f 0.268 pC i at a 95% co n ommissioni n i nation of C s ompare site out. The L for backgro u presented i u nd studies d rainage ar e W R, the up p oil from the e characteri z this LTP.

I r of the LT P h e approved 005, Dairyl a series of s d area. T h rmed a limi t s to assess i nd asphalt.

o the decom m tifie d. Con sand the Ra d d LACBWR previous ra ACBWR li c s urvey unit L m ents were c quired fro mwithin non

-1 2107 and o ls. Analysi s e d favorabl y s slightly a bperformed a d the site pr o i/g. The s t n fidence lev e n g of the Zi o s-137 Glob asoil sample LACBWR a n u nd concent r in Table 2-6performed a eas. As th e per 95 th per Zion backg r zation throu g I n the case w P will be up LTP. and perfor moil samples h e result o f t ed assessm e i f backgrou n m issioning s s equently, a n d iation Prot e site that sediological s u c ensed area

, L 3012101, walso collec t m a small a r-impacted s u o ther areas w s results for y with the b ove MDC. a t LACBW R oduced a m e t andard dev i e l of 0.275 p o n Nuclear P al Fallout in Cs-137 res u nd Zion sit e rations of C s 6. The obs e a t LACBW R e re were v acentile leve l r ound study g hout w here dated m ed a were f this e nt of n d at site to n on-e ction emed urvey , they w hich ted in r ea of urvey within these 2005 This R, the e an of iation Ci/g. P ower Soils ults at e s are s-137 erved R fall arious l s for were La Cros s License T Revisio n consider e areas, an 2.3.2.P Energy S o Decomm decomm ifrom th esome of tless tha n prepared 2.3.3.N Based u p 163.5 ac rimpacte dcontami n operatio n ISFSI w operatio n physical for com pfor the c l The non-segregat einside o f Highwa y study fo r within s uin coal f ISFSI fa c From O cimpacte d survey u n and the iimpacte d To supp objectiv e open lan d b y perfo r The 201 5primary surveys a s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e d appropri a d Class 2 a n P otential Ra o lutions T S issioning (i ssioning of sampling o the theoreti c n 2 years, a

n. The list o f N on-Impact e pon the info r re licensed d." The n n ation given n s. The de t w ere not im p n s (i.e., wit h characterist p liance bey o l assification

.-impacted o p e d into five f survey un i y 35. This s r soils. The u rvey unit L 4 from the G-c ility, whic h c tobe r 2014 d open land n its and we r initial result d as it was d ort this co n e of the ad d d survey un i rming additi 5 characteri zobjectives and sampli n W ater Reacto r Plan a te backgr o n d 3 open la n dionuclide s S D RS-TD-3 (16) establi LACBWR. o f various m c al neutron a n initial suit e f potential r a e d Open L a rmation co m site surrou n n on-impacte that histori c termination p acted by l h in the LSE i cs. The ar e o nd the char

a. p en land are survey uni t it L401210 8 s urvey unit non-impact e 4 012103. A-3 station a n h has not be e to August areas of t h r e character is of the 20 1 dete rmined t n clusion, a ditional char a i ts given an ional soil sa m zation camp o f the addi n g to suppo r r o und conce n n d area surv e s of Concer n 3 13196-001 ,shes the b a Industry g u media from p activation pr o e of potenti a a dionuclides a nd Areas mpiled in th e nding the L d areas h a cal informat ithat the co n l icensed op e), site use, t e as designa t acterization a is approxi m t s. Non-im p 8 in a vegetwas forme d ed survey u n A majority o f nd survey u n en characteri z 2015, cha r h e site. Th e ized as suc h 14 character i that there is d ditional c h acterization initial Class m pling and g aign was d etional char a r t the "non 22 ntration lev e e y units at L n , R adionu c a sis for an uidance was p ast plant o o ducts, nobl a l ROC for is listed in T e HSA, a la r L SE and I S a ve no re a i on provide s n tiguous op e e rations wa s t opography, t ed as non-i msurveys an d m ately 352, 3 p acte d ope nated area w d during ch a n its are sho w f the surface n it L40121 0 z ed and is n o r acterization e survey un i h in Referen c ization, the s no reasona b haracterizati osurveys pe r 3 classifica t gamma wal k esigne d in a c a cterization

-impacted" c els for the LACBWR. c lides of C initial suit ereviewed a s o perations.

l e gases and the decom m T able 2-7.

rge portion o S FSI receiv e a sonable p o s no indicati o e n land are a s based on site discha r m pacted ar e d sampling p 3 60 square m n land surv e with minima l aracterizati o w n in Figurearea in sur v 06 complet e ot addresse dsurveys w its were or i ce 13. Bas e se survey u n ble potentia on was per f rformed in 2 t ion for re-c l k over surve y ccordance w was to pe r classificatio n evaluation C oncern D e of potent i s well as the Based on t h radionuclid e m issioning o o f the open ed a classi f o tential to on of impac t a s surround ithe locati o rge pathwa y e not requir e p erformed t o meters in si z e y unit L40 l ground di s on to facilit a 2-1. The G vey unit L4 0 e ly surroun d d by this LT P w ere perfor m i ginally cla s e d upon a re v n its were re c a l for residu a formed in 2 2 015 was t olassificatio n ys. with Referen c r form suffi c n and to p r of non-im p uring LA C ial ROC f oanalytical r e he eliminati o e s with a ha lf LACBW R land areas o fication as "contain re s t from LAC B i ng the LS E o n(s) of lic e y s, and oth e e d to be sur v o provide a ze. This are a 12109 is l o sturbance e a ate a backg r G-3 station r e 0 12105 is co v ds the LAC B P. m ed in the ssified as C l v iew of the classified as al contamin a 2 015. A m o evaluate c e n as non-im p c e 4. One o c ient radiol o rovide reaso p acte d C BWR o r the esults o n of lf-life R was o n the "non-s idual BWR E and e nsed er site v eyed basis a was o cated ast of r ound esides v ered B WR non-l ass 3 HSA non-a tion. m ajor ertain pacted of the o gical nable La Cros s License T Revisio n assuranc e 2015 ch a b ased o n During t h units L4 0 logger w was sca nGamma s or grave lMinimu m evaluate d survey u n an Expl o were du eThirty-t w toward d shown i ninstrume npositivel y surface s These v ain sectio n specific bin the g r were ver y Sevente emeter. concentr a derived g average maximu m b ackgro u 137 con c surface s the Hwy Two as p survey u n were les sidentifie dA summ presente d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e that the n a racterizatio n a random d h e 2015 ch a 0 12103, L4 0 w ith a 2" by 2 n ned due to s urface sca n l. Alarm s e m Detectab l d during th e n it L40121 0 oranium GR-e to the pres e w o surface s d iscolored ar n Figure 2-5 n t MDC in y identified soil samples a lues are wi t n 2.3.1. On b ackground r ounds east y close at 0.

e n subsurfac Of the 1 7 ations great e gamma-emi t C s-137 con c m observed u nd range fo c entrations t h s oil backgro u 35/Railroa d phalt sampl e nits. The as p s than the M d by gamma ary of the g d in Table 2

-W ater Reacto r Plan n on-impacte d n survey fo c esign to ens u a racterizatio 0 12105, L4 0 2" NaI dete cinaccessibil i nning focuse d e t-points fo r e Count R a e performa n 7 and one i n-135. The e nce of natu r s oil sample seas or areas

5. Cs-137 26 of the 3 2 by gamma swas 0.131 hin the exp e ly one Cs-1 3data set. T h of Highwa y 135 pCi/g a ne soil samp l 7 subsurfac e e r than the t ting radion u c entration o b concentrat i r Cs-137 as ha t exceede und. This s d Right of W e s were col l phalt surfac e MDC of 1,9 3 spectrosco p gamma spec t-8. r d survey un i cused prima r u re an unbi a n survey, a 0 12106 and ctor. In sur v ity from th e d on undist u r the instru m a te (MDCR)n ce of the g n survey uni tresults of t h ral backgro u s were coll e where the g was positi v 2 samples.

s pectroscop y p Ci/g with ected backg r 37 result ex c his sample w y 35. The m nd 0.131 pC l es were ta k e soil sam pinstrument uclides wer e b serve d in t i on of 0.4 0 discussed i nd the maxi m sample was t W ay Grounds lected from e was first s c 38 dpm/100 c p y in any of t t roscopy res u 2-23 i ts do not c rily on soils a sed survey.minimum o L4012108 v ey unit L4 0 e presence o urbed soils w m ent were s) of the in s gamma sca n t L4012108.

h e investig a und activity.

ected from g round had b vely identi f No other p o y. The aver aa maximu m r ound range ceeded the m was the max i m ean of the ni/g, respecti v k en at rando m p les taken, MDC in ei e positively i t he subsurf a 09 pCi/g. T h n section 2.

3 mum Cs-13 7 the maxim u. random lo c c anned wit h cm 2. No pl a t he asphalt s ults for eac h c ontain plan tand asphalt of 1% of th e was scanne d 0 12107, les sf tall, thick with minima l s et at the o b strument.

A n, one in s u All scan a l a tion indica tnon-impact e been disturb e f ied in con c o tential pla n a ge Cs-137 c m observed c for Cs-137 maxium res u imum 0.463 non-impact e v ely. mly selecte d Cs-137 wght sample s i dentified b y ace soil sa m h ese valu e 3.1. Only o n 7 concentrat i um 0.409 p C cations in p h a beta-gam m a nt derived r samples. h non-impa c t-derived r a t. The sam p e surface s o d with a M o s than 1% o f vegetation a l vegetation bserved bac k A total of f u rvey unit L larms were i n t ed the elev e d areas at e d. The sa m centrations n t-derived r a concentratio concentratio n surface sa m ult of 0.268 pCi/g valu e e d and site-s d locations t w as positiv e s. No othe r y gamma s p m ples was 0.

e s are wit h n e subsurfac i on found i n C i/g value th paved areas mma detector radionuclide c te d open l a adioactivity.

ple locations oil area in s u o del 2350-1 f the surfac e a nd steep te or disturbe d k ground pl u f ou r alarms L 4012106, t w nvestigated u vated scan r elocations b m ple locatio ngreater tha n a dionuclides n observed i n of 0.463 p m ples as disc upCi/g in th e e and was l o s pecific dat a t o a depth o ely identifi e r potential p p ectroscopy.

087 pCi/g w h in the ex pe sample ha n the site-sp eat was loca tin non-imp. All scan r e s were posi t a nd survey u The were urvey data e area rrain. d soils u s the were w o in using e sults b iased n s are n the were i n the pCi/g. u ssed e site-ocated a sets o f one e d in plant- The with a pected d Cs-ecific ted in p acte d esults tively u nit is La Cros s License T Revisio n A coal a ssamples The resu l The la b concentr a also posi concentr a consider e of the p l radionucpositive ratios a rcompare d higher t h operatio n consiste n the spor a derived r In surve y gamma s area to d approxi muranium readings 2.3.4.I m The HS A operatio n been cla s b een ide n into two north of Highwa y three Cl a The cha r prepared employe d radionuc of suffic i surface a obtained Survey contami n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 sh sample f r were sent t o lts of the an a b oratory a n ations exce e tively detec t a tions of th e e d to very l i l ant-derived lide mixtu rresults for C r e 118 and d to the sit e han expecte d n al history, t n t with natu r adic positive r adionuclide y unit L401 2 s pectroscop y determine i f m ately 7,00 0 and thoriu m conducted d m pacted O p A identifie d n s. The ap p ssified as C ntified as "

iClass 2 sur v the LSE, t h y 35 and th e a ss 3 survey r acterization for each s d to determ l ide concen t i ent quantit y a nd subsur ffrom belo w techniques n ation ident i W ater Reacto r Plan rom survey u o Test Am e alysis are pr e nalysis spo r eding the M D t ed but at le v e positively i i kely be the radionucli d r e fractions C s-137, Sr-16, respec t e-specific m i d by factor s t he radionuc ral backgro u analytical r s in these s u 2 108, a rep r y. In additi o f there is a 0 to 8,000 c p m series nu c during the w p en Land A d the open proximate ar e Class 1. An impacted" b vey units.

T he transmis s e haul road uunits combi nof the impa c s urvey unit ine the late r trations in t h y and qualit y face soils i n w the structu rwere emp l i fied an d t h r u nit L40121 e rica Labor a esented in T radically i d D C, includi n v els that are i dentified ra dresult of co u d es. This

c. For exa m 90 and Fe-5 tively. W h i xture fracti s of 4,800 a l ide ratios, a u nd and co m esults are v e urvey units.

resentative s o n, gamma ssignificant pm). The a clides with alkover sur v Areas land area ea is 1.5 ac rapproxima t y reactor o p Three impac t s ion switch y used to tra n n ed is appr o c ted open l a in accord a r al and vert he soil. Cha r y to quantify n each ope n res due to in t l oyed to d e h e radionuc l 2-24 05, six surf a atories for g T able 2-9.

d entified s e ng H-3, C-1 4consistent w dionuclides w u nting unce r c onclusion w mple, samp 5 5. Howe v hen the rati ons in Cha p a nd 10,700, and primaril y m prise 88%

o ery unlikely s ample of t h s can readin gdifference analysis of t no plant d e v ey average dinside the r es. All op e tely 3.46 ac r p erations.

T ted Class 3 s y ard and th e n sport dry f u oximately 1 6 a nd areas be g ance with Rical extent o racterizatio n the potenti a n land surv e t erferences a etermine t h l ide concen t face soil sa m gamma spec t e veral pla n 4, Fe-55, N i with natural b were close t rtainty as o p w as support e le L30121 0 v er, the S r-9 ios from L 3 p te r 6, Tabl e respectivel y the conce n of the site-s p to represen t he rail road g s were tak efrom site b t he railroad e rived radio d 7,000-8,5 0 fenced LS E e n land surv e r e area that T his open l a s urvey units e area enco m u el casks to 6.5 acres.

g an in Octo b R eference 4 o f any cont n inspection s al volumetri c ey unit. L i a nd inaccess he lateral a t rations in t m ples and fi v t roscopy an d n t-derived r i-63, and Sr

-background t o the detect i pposed to th e d by a re v 0 5-CR-GS-0 9 0/Cs-137 a n 3012105-C R e 6-3, it is s l y. In con c n trations of C p ecific radi o t the actual p bed gravel e n of the rai l b ackground bed gravel o nuclides.

T 0 0 cpm. E as "impa c e y units ins i surrounds t a nd area has were desig n mpassing t h the ISFSI.

b e r 2014. A 4. Survey amination i d s and survey s c contamina t imited soil ibility.

a nd vertica l t he soil.

A ve subsurfac d HTD ana l radionuclid e-90. Cs-13

7. In all cas e ion limits a ne actual pre s view of exp 0 02-SS ind i nd Fe-55/C s R-GS-002-S Seen that th e clusion, bas e C s-137 whi c onuclide mi x presence of pwas analyz e l road bed g (which ave r indicated n a T he gamma c ted" by r e i de the LSE t he LSE ha s b een segre n ated for th e he site acce s The area o A sample pla ntechniques dentified a n s were perf o t ion of acce sinformatio n l extent o f A combinati oe soil lyses. e s at 7 was e s, the nd are s ence p ected icates s-137 S are e y are ed on c h are xture, p lant-ed by g ravel raged atural scan eactor have s also gated e area s s off of the n was were nd the ormed ssible n was f any o n of La Cros s License T Revisio nrandom a survey p professi o Protecti o radioacti v spill loc a survey l o not req u location s radiolog i A surfac e surface s or surfa c were tak eintervals Each su rsite radi o necessar y All surf a Several sfull isot o survey u n 2.3.4.1.

There ar e The Cla sarea in t h Reactor radioacti vareas, pr e Twenty-tmeasura b location s taken in taken, Csamples 13 samp lidentifie dthe sur f 0.287 p Csamples w Seventy-one met e s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a nd biased s ackage. Th e o nal judgm e o n Supervis v ity, depres a tions, or a r o cations wa s u ired for so i s were sele c ical contami n e soil sampl eoil samples ce scans ind i e n from 0.1

5. rface soil, c o ological lab y to achiev e a ce and sub soil samples opic analysi s n it per Ref e Class e fou r (4) o p ss 1 open la n he Class 1 o p Building, t h v ely conta m e vented the a two (22) su r b le radioac t s , or areas wClass 1 ope n C o-60 was p and Cs-13 7 l es. No ot h d by gamm a fa ce soil s a Ci/g. The a w as 0.096 pnine (79) s u e r, two (2) l o W ater Reacto r Plan urvey locat i e locations o e nt of the E o r. Consi sions, disco reas where t s also deter m i ls in an o p c ted on as p n ation. e was taken were acqui r i cated eleva t 5 cm to dep t omposite su b oratory by e an isotopi c surface co m were select e s (HTD rad i erence 4. 1 Open La n p en land su r n d survey u n p en land su r h e Turbine m inated buil d ability to pe r rface soil sa m tivity, disco w here the gr o n land su r v e p ositively i d 7 was posi t h er potenti a spectrosco p amples wa s verage Cs-1Ci/g with a m ubsurface so o cations bia s r i ons were e s o f biased m e E nergy Solut i deration w alored areas, t he ground h m ined by ar e p en land ar e p halt in Cl a at each sele r ed at sever a ted activity.

t hs ranging f b surface soi l gamma-spe c c MDC equ a m posite sam p e d at rando m i onuclides).

n d Areas r vey units c l nits are sho w r vey units is Building, t h d ing and sy s r form surfa c mples were lored areas

, o und had b e ey units are s dentified in tively iden t al plant-deri v py. The ave r s 0.058 pCi

/1 37 concen t maximum o bil samples w s ed to areas o 2-25 s tablished in easurement s i ons Project a s given t o low point g h ad been d i e a classifica t e as designa t ass 1 surve y cted biased a al random lo Depending from 1 to 3 m l sample or c troscopy.

a l to or less p les were a n m an d were s Duplicate lassified as w n in Figure obstructed b h e WTB an d s tems, as w e c e scanning dtaken at lo c , buried pi p e en disturbe d s hown in Fi gconcentrat i tified in co n ved gamm a r age Co-60 c/g with a t ration obse r b served con c w ere taken a o n the south each surve y s and/or sa mHealth Ph y o locations gravity drai n isturbed. T h tion. Rando a ted as Cla s y units wh e and rando m cations or i f on the loc a m below gr aasphalt sa mAnalysis c o s than 0.10 p nalyzed aft e s hipped to Tsamples an dClass 1 at L 2-1. A sig nby the pres e d the LSA ell as stored d ue to high b cations b ias e pe location s d. The loc a gure 2-6.

O i ons greate r ncentration s a-emitting r a concentrati omaximum r ved in the centration o at 10 surfac e and west si d y unit in ac c m ples were d ysicist and that exhi b n areas, act u h e number m-b ased m e ss 1. Rand o ere there w a-b ased surv e f surface soi a tion, subsur a de an d co m m ple was an a ount times w pCi/g for C s er drying t h Test Americ a d concrete w LACBWR t o nificant port i ence of buil d Building. radioactive b ackground.e d toward si t s, actual a n a tions of sur f Of the 22 sur r than the M s greater t h adionuclide s on observed observed canalysis o f f 1.07 pCi/

g e soil locati o de of the W G cordance wi t d etermined b the Radiol o bited meas u u al and pot eof rando m-b easurements om measur e a s no histo r e y location. l sample an aface soil sa m m posited ove alyzed by t h were adjust e s-137 and C he sample m a Laboratori e w ere collect e otaling 8,44 3 i on of the s u dings, name lThe presenmaterial in

. tes that exh i nd potential f ace soil sa m face soil sa m M DC in t w h an the M D s were posi tin the analy c oncentrati o f the surfac e g. o ns to a de p G TV and fi v th the b y the ogical urable e ntial based were ement r y of Sub-alysis mples r 1 m h e on-e d as C o-60. m edia. es for e d by 3 m 2. u rface l y the ce of these i bited spill mples m ples w o (2) D C in tively sis of on of e soil pth of v e (5)

La Cros s License T Revisio n location s The sa m evaluate Building samples 15 samp lidentifie d of the s u 0.161 p C areas is foundati o decomm i Ten sa m asphalt w this sur v results r ameasure midentifie d 0.057 p CA summ presente d Nine su rsamples gamma s In additi detected One sed i unit L10 and HT D 0.136 p C 2.3.4.2.The im pimmedia t two sur v LACB W these tw o Approxi m 2350-1 dAlarm s einstrume n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 s that access mples at the t the subsurf a were taken taken, Cs-1 l es. No ot h d by gamm a ubsurface s o Ci/g. The as snot curren t o ns and sur r i ssioning pr o mples were t a was taken fr o v ey unit. T h anging from ment of 3,0 9 d in conce n Ci/g. ary of the f i d in Table 2

-rface soil s ataken from s pectroscop y on to detec t at concentr a iment samp l 10103. Thi s D analyses.

Ci/g. Class acted Class te area surr o ey units. T h WR Crib Ho u o survey uni t mately 1% o d ata logger w et-points for n t. No scan W ater Reacto r Plan e d the soils two WGT V ace soils alo nand compo 1 37 was po s h er potenti a a spectrosco p oil samples sessment of tly complet e r ounding b u o cess, when a ken of as p om the sam e h e asphalt s the instrum e 95 dpm/100 ntrations gr e i ndings of t h-10. amples, 11 sClass 1 ope n y and HTD a t ing Co-60 ations greate le was take n s sample w a Co-60 and 2 Open La n 2 open la n o unding the hese are sh o u se, the G-3 t s. o f the surfa c w ith a 2" b ythe instru malarms wer e r under the T V locations w n gside and usited at dep t sitively ide n al plant-deri v p y. The av e was 0.055 ppotential s u e. Soil in uried struct uaccess will b phalt from p e location se s urface was e nt MDC o f c m 2. Of t h eater than he survey f o subsurface s n land surv e a nalyses. T hand Cs-137r than the i n n from the s a s also sent t C-137 wer e n d Areas nd areas tot a LSE. The C o wn in Figu r 3 Crib Hou s ce soil area i y 2" NaI d e m ent were se t e observed.

2-26 u rbine Buil d w ere acquir e u nderneath t h t hs of 10, 1 5 ntified in c o ved gamm a e rage Cs-13 p Ci/g with ubsurface so idifficult t o u res and pi p b e more rea d p aved areas lected for t hfirst scann e f 2,771 dpm

/he 10 aspha lMDC in o n o r each indi v soil samples ey units we r he results of , H-3, C-1 4 nstru m ent M D sanitary soli d to Test Ame r e detected i n a l approxi m Class 2 imp a re 2-1. The se and the L in survey u n etector. Th i t at the obs e d ing throug h e d to a dep t h e vault. T h 5 and 20 fe e oncentratio n a-emitting r a 7 concentra ta maximu m il contamin a o access ar e p ing has be edily availab lin Class 1 s h e surface a n ed with bet a/100c m 2 to a l t samples t n ly one sa m v idual Clas s s , one conc r r e sent to T e fthe analysi s 4, Fe-55 an d DC. ds tank that rica Labora t n this sampl m ately 13,99 a cted open l LACBWR LACBWR w nit L201110 is area incl u erved backg r h angled Ge o t h of five m h e samples u e t. Of the 7 ns greater t h adionuclide s t ion observ e m observed ation in the C eas such a s e n deferred le. s urvey unit n d subsurfa c a-gamma d e a maximum t aken, Cs-1 3 m ple at a s 1 open lan d rete sample est Americ a s are presen t d Ni-63 we ris located i t ory for ga me, both at a 6 m 2 and a rand area w aAdministra t w arehouses a 1 was scan n u ded asphal t r ound plus t o probe sam p m eters in or d u nder the T u 7 9 subsurfac e han the M D s were posi t e d in the an a concentrati o Class 1 ope n s under b u iuntil later i L1010104.

ce soil samp l etector with of observe d 3 7 was posi tconcentrati o d survey u n and two a s a Laboratori e ted in Table r e also posi t in Class 1 s u m ma spectro sconcentrati re located i n as segregate d tion Buildin g a re all loca t ned with a M t paved sur f t he MDCR o p ling. d er to urbine e soil D C in tively alysis o n of n land ilding n the The l es in scan d scan tively on of nit are s phalt e s for 2-11. tively urvey scopy on of n the d into g , the ted in M odel f aces. of the La Cros s License T Revisio n Twenty-tmeasura b location s taken in taken, C s other po t The ave r 0.077 p C Twenty-t and thre e resides i n Of the 2 greater t h than M Didentifie d of 0.112 samples assessm ecurrentl y surroun d process, w Twelve s selected results r 2,748 dp m concentr a concentr a observe dA summ presente d Three su rsamples Adminis t HTD an a Co-60 a concentr a HTD ra d 2.3.4.3.The imp a land are a Figure 2-site, the t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 t hree surfac b le radioac t s , or areas wClass 2 ope n s-137 was p tential plan t rage Cs-13 7 C i/g with a m t hree subsur e locations b n survey un i 23 subsurfa c han MDC i n D C in fou r d by gamma pCi/g. The was 0.043 e nt of pote n y complete.

d ing buried s when acces s samples wer erandomly.

r anging fr o m/100c m 2. a tions grea t a tion obser v d concentrati ary of the f i d in Table 2

-rface soil s a taken fro m tration Buil d a lyses. The a nd Cs-137, ations great e d ionuclides e Class a cted Class 3 a was segr e-1. The Cl a transmissio n W ater Reacto r Plan e soil sam p tivity, disco w here the gr o n land surv e positively id e t-derived ra d 7 concentra t maximum ob s face soil sa m b iased to ar e i t L201110 1 ce soil sam p n one sampl e samples.

N spectrosco p average Cs

-pCi/g wit h n tial subsur f Soil in di f s tructures a n s will be mo r e taken of a s The asphal t o m the in s Of the 1 2 ter than th e v ed in the a n on of 0.055 i ndings of t h-12. amples, five m an acce s ding were s eresults of t h H-3, C-1 4 e r than M D e xceeding M 3 Open La n 3 open land egated into ass 3 impact e n switchyard r p les were ta klored areas

, o und had b e ey units are s e ntified at c o dionuclides t ion observ e s erved conc e m ples were t e as alongsi d 1. The b ias e p les taken, e and Cs-13 N o other p o p y. The sin g-137 concen t h a maxim u f ace soil co n fficult to ac n d piping h a r e readily a v sphalt from p t surface wa strument M 2 asphalt s a e instrume n n alysis of th epCi/g. he survey f osubsurface s ssible stor m e nt to Test he analysis a 4 , Fe-55 a n D C. As dis c M DC are like l n d Areas areas total athree surv e e d open lan dfor the LA C 2-27 k en at loca t , buried pi p e en disturbe d s hown in Fi g oncentratio n were positi v e d in the a n e ntration of taken at 14 r d e and unde r ed samples w Co-60 was 7 was posit i o tential pla n gle sample w t ration obse r u m observe ntamination cess areas s a s been def e vailable. p aved areas s first scan n M DC of 2 ,mples take n n t MDC in e asphalt sa m o r each indi v soil samples

, m sewer b aAmerica L a are presente d nd Cm-243/c ussed in s e l y to be fals e approximate l e y units.

T d survey u n C BWR and G t ions biase d pe location s d. The loc a gure 2-7.

O n s greater t h vely identif i nalysis of t h 0.200 pCi/g r andom loc a rneath the S were acquir e positively ively identi f n t-derived r a w ith d etecta b r ved in the a d concentr a n in the Cl a s uch as un d e rred until lin Class 2 s u ned with be t,529 dpm/1 0 n, Cs-137 w three sam p m ples was 0 v idual Clas s , three asph a asin manho l aboratories f d in Table 2

/244 were e ction 2.3.3 e positives.

ly 66,765m 2 The Class 3 n its include t G-3 facilitie d toward sit s, actual a n a tions of sur f Of the 23 sur h an MDC in i ed by gam m h e surface s g. a tions to a d e Storm Sewe r ed to a dep tidentified a f ied at conc e a dionuclide s ble Co-60 h a a nalysis of t h a tion of 0.

0 ass 2 open l d er building ater in the d u rvey units.

t a-gamma d e 0 0c m 2 to a was positiv e p les. The 0.049 pCi/g s 2 open lan d a lt samples a l e located f or gamma s-13. In ad d also positi v for non-im p 2. The Class survey un i t he north e ns, the LAC Bes that exh i nd potential f ace soil sa m face soil sa m14 samples ma spectros c soil sample s e pth of one m r Water pip e t h of five m at concentr a e ntrations g r s were posi t a d a concent r h e subsurfac 088 pCi/g.

l and areas i foundation s decommissi o The aspha l e tector wit h a maximu mely identifi e average C swith a max i d survey u n a nd two sed i in front o f s pectroscop y d ition to det e vely detect e p acted area s 3 impacted i ts are sho w nd of the lic e BWR plant a ibited spill mples m ples . No c opy. s was m ete r e that m eters. ations r eater tively ration e soil The s not s and o ning l t was h scan m of e d in s-137 imum nit are iment f the y and e cting ed at s , the open w n in e nsed a ccess La Cros s License T Revisio n and righ t was dee m LACB W Crib Ho ufacility d were de e These a r Solution sA mini m scanned was exc l focused o points fo No scan Thirty-t w where t h open lan was posi plant-de r The ave r 0.131 p C Sevente emeter.

concentr a radionuc concentr amaximu m Two sa m selected results w were po sA summ presente d As part o of concr e Crib Ho uAdminis t survey u n Three c o L30121 0 three su r Laborat o s e Boiling W Termination n 0 t-of-way are med impact e WR Adminis t u se). The t r d uring opera t emed as im p reas were c s maintains t mum of 1% with a Mod luded from o n undistur br the instru malarms wer e wo surface s o h e ground h a d survey u ntively ident i rived gamm a rage Cs-13 7 C i/g with a m e n subsurfac Of the 1 7 a tions gre a lides were a tion obser v m observed c m ples were trandomly.

were less th a sitively iden t ary of the f i d in Table 2

-o f the chara c e te located i use. In add i tration Buil d n it L301210 o ncrete sam p 0 1, the two s e rface soil s ories for ga m W ater Reacto r Plan a and the h a e d by LAC B tration Buil d ransmission tions. The p p acted by t h onservative l that classify i of the sur f el 2350-1 d agamma su r bed soils w i m ent were s e e observed i n oil samples a d been dis t n its are sho w ified in con c a-emitting r a 7 concentra t maximum ob se soil samp l 7 subsurfac e ater than Mpositively v ed in the a concentrati o aken of asp hThe asphalt an instrume n t ified by ga m i ndings of t h-14. cterization o f i n the nort h ition, a sa m d ing and t w 9. These sa m ples from s u ediment sa m samples an d m ma spect r r aul road to t h B WR due t o ding and the yard was d p lant access he transit o f l y classifie d i ng these ar e f ace soil ar e a ta logger w r face scann i ith minimal e t at the obs e n these surv e were taken t urbed. Th e w n in Figur e centrations g a dionuclide s t ion observ e s erved conc e l es were ta k e soil sam p MDC in e iidentified analysis of t h on of 0.409 p halt from p asurface wa nt MDC of 1 m ma spectro he survey f o f survey uni t h section of m ple was tak e wo sedimen t m ples were u rvey unit L 3 m ples taken f d two sub s r oscopy an d 2-28 h e ISFSI fa c o the prese n presence o f d eemed as i marea, High w f packaged r d as impact e e as as non-i m ea in surve y w ith a 2" by i ng for saf e vegetation o erved backg r ey units. at locations e locations o e 2-8. Of t h greater than s were posit i e d in the a n e ntration of k en at rando m p les taken, ight sample s by gamma h e subsurfa c pCi/g. a ved areas i n s first scan n 1,938 dpm/1 scopy in an y o r each indi v t L3012101 ,the survey u en from a s a t samples wsent off-site 3 012101, t h f rom the sto r s urface soil d HTD ana l c ility. The n n ce of a se p f concrete fr m pacted as i w ay 35 righ t radioactive m ed. Howe v m pacted wo u y units L3 0 2" NaI det e e ty reasons.

o r disturbe d round plus t biased tow of surface s he 32 surfac eMDC in 26 ively identi f nalysis of t h 0.463 pCi/g mly selecte d Cs-137 w s. No ot h spectrosc o c e soil sam p n Class 3 s u n ed with be t 1 00c m 2. N o y of these sa m v idual Clas s , samples w e unit that or i anitary tan k w ere taken fr e for isotopi c he sanitary t a rm sewer b a samples w l yses. The n orth end o f ptic system from impact e it was part o t-of way an d m aterial thr o v e r , it shou u ld have be e 0 12101 and ector. Surv e Gamma d soils or gr a t he MDCR o ard discolo roil samples e soil samp lsamples.

N fied by gam m h e surface s g. d locations t w as positiv e t her potent i opy. The p les was 0.

0 urvey units.

ta-gamma d e o plant deri v amples. s 3 open lan d e re taken fr o i ginated fro m k that servic e from a stor m c analysis.

a nk sample a sin in surve y w ere sent tresults of f the license that servic e e d structure s of the LAC B d ISFSI hau l o ugh these a ld be note d e n appropria t L3012109 ey unit L30 1 surface sca n avel. Alar m of the instru m r ed areas or taken in C l l es taken, C s N o other pot e m a spectros c soil sample s t o a depth o ely identifi e i al plant-d eaverage C s 0 87 pCi/g w The asphal t e tector. Al l v ed radionu c d survey u n om several p m the LAC B e s the LAC B m sewer ba sfrom surve y y unit L301 2 to Test A mthe analysi d site es the s (the B WR l road areas. d that te. were 1 2102 nning m set-m ent. areas l ass 3 s-137 e ntial copy. s was o f one e d in erived s-137 w ith a t was l scan c lides nit are pieces BWR BWR s in in y unit 2 109, m erica i s are La Cros s License T Revisio n presente d derived R and Ni-6 exceedi n consiste n 2.3.5.N Based u p associat e indicate dA full li s 2. The pri minformat i operatio nfrom th e characte r The res u conduct etraffic in

The G-3incident s results o f A scan s u gamma d using an was also gross be t MDC o fidentifie d gross al pcontami nsamples.

derived 0.061 p C that the material Direct a ntraffic a r Model 2 3 areas of i ranged f exceede d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 d in Table 2 R OC at resi d 6 3. As di s n g MDC are nt with natu r N on-Impact e p on the in f ed with the G d that there w s t of G-3 str u m ary b asis f ion docume n n s. Additio e LACBW R r ization of t ults are pro v e d during th ethe major s t station re s s of radioac t f the charac t urvey was p d etector. In alpha/beta-gtaken at th e t a-gamma a f 2,816 dpm

/d gross beta

-p ha activit y n ation was i The roof m ROC that w Ci/g. Based elevated di r on the roof.

nd removab l reas of the 3 60 instrum e i nterest wer e from 2,540 d the MDC d W ater Reacto r Plan 2-15. The dual concen t scussed in slikely to be r al backgrou n e d Structur f ormation c o G-3 Coal Pl a was no reas o uctures that for the "no n n ted in the H nally, the p R Stack d u t he LACB W vided in R e e 2015 char a tation buildi n sides in no n t ive conta merization su r performed o f addition, si x gamma pro p location of ctivity rang i/100c m 2. T-gamma act i y ranging fdentified at material its e w as positiv e on the fact t r ect alpha m le contamin G-3 Coal P e nt with 43

-e scanne d , i ndpm/100c m d uring the c o r analysis o f t rations gre a s ection 2.3.

3 false positi v nd. es ompiled in ant may be c o nable pote nhave been d n-impacted" HSA that th e potential for u ring oper a WR Adminis t e ference 13 a cterization ngs were su r n-impacted s m ination of s r veys perfor m f the mi d-le v x (6) locati o p ortional det eeach direct m ing from 2, 3 The results o i vity rangin g from 142 d pconcentrati o elf was sam p ely identifi e t hat no othe r measurement s ation surve y Plant. Sca n-93 detector

.n cluding flo o m 2 to 2,61 7 o urse of thi s 2-29 fthese sam p a ter than th e 3 for non-i m ves. Cs-137 the HSA, S classified as n tial for resi designated a sclassificati o e G-3 struct u windborne ations to s tration Buil

d. Additio ncampaign w r veyed. s urvey unit soils, aspha l m ed in the G v el roof of t h ons were sel e ector. A s m measureme n 302 dpm/10 of the dire c g from 1,60 3 pm/100c m 2 ons greater t p led on Ju n ed by gam m r plant deri v s were due ys were per f n measurem e. Approxi m o rs and low e 7 dpm/100c m s survey. T e p les positiv e e instrument m pacted ar e was also po S olutions c o"non-impa cdual conta m s "non-imp a o n fo r the G u res were n omigration o structure ro o ding roof a n n al surveys w here the s u L4012103.

l t or concr e G-3 station a h e G-3 Coa l e cted at ran d mear sample n t. The res u 0c m 2 to 2, 8 c t beta-gam m 3 dpm/100c mto 258 dp mthan MDC b ne 30, 2015.

m a spectro s v ed ROC w amost likely f ormed of r e e nts were p m ately 5% o f er wall surf a m 2. No o en (10) loca t ely identifi e MDC, incl u eas, the H T o sitively det e o ncluded t h cted". Hist o m ination fro m a cted" is pro v G-3 station o t used for L o f airborne ofs was e v n d the G-3 of the G-3 u rfaces subj e There ar e e te in this s u are summari z l Plant buil d dom for dir efor remova b ults of the b e 816 dpm/10 0 m a and alp h m 2 to 2,072 m/100c m 2. b y the anal y Cs-137 w a scopy at a as detected, to the pre s epresentati v p erformed u s f the concre t a ces. The a v o bserved sc a tions were c h e d several p u ding H-3, F T D radionu c e cted but at l hat the stru c orical infor m m site opera t v ided in Ta b structures i LACBWR-r e effluent rel e v aluated b y Coal Plant structures ected to hig h e no docum urvey unit.

zed as follo w d ing using a ect measure m ble contami n eta scan ide n 0 c m 2 with a h a measure mdpm/100c m No remo v ysis of the s a s the only concentrati o it was conc l sence of co a ve high pers o s ing the L u te surfaces i verage scan Man measur e hosen at ra n p lant-Fe-55 c lides levels c tures m ation tions. ble 2-is the elated eased y the roof. were h foot ented The w s: beta-m ents n ation n tified scan m ents m 2 and v able smear plant o n of l uded a l ash onnel udlum i n the MDC ement ndom, La Cros s License T Revisio nprimaril ymeasure m 875 dp m greater t h 2.3.6.I m The dec oimpacte dIn additi o accepted remain a Reactor Bremaini n and flo o Reactor/G Turbine surfaces segregat e radioacti vsystems o Radiolo gcomplia n radiolog i areas.

disasse mremediat demoliti o waste. After co m3 feet b e radioacti v use crite r 2.3.6.1.

Charact e consiste d walls an(primari l taken fr o 621 foot the 633 fsamples w Piping T u s e Boiling W Termination n 0 y from the m ents for g/100c m 2 for h an MDC b y mpacted St r ommissioni n d b uildings, s on, all syste m elevation f o a nd be subj e B uilding th a ng reinforce d o rs of the Generator P sump and t habove the ed by waste v e waste.

or structure s g ical survey s n ce with 1 0 i cal conditi o The radiol o m bly and re m i on has ad e on, the imp a mmodity re m elow grade , vity and th e ria. Base m rization of d primarily o d floors of l y the Pipin g om the 615 elevation i n f oot elevati o w ere collec t unnel. The l W ater Reacto r Plan main lobb y gross activit beta-gamm y the analysi r uctures a n n g approac h structures, s y m s and exp o o r grade at L ected to ST S at will be ex p d concrete w WGTV, a nlant basem e he Turbine 636 foot el e classificati o No extens i s that will b e s of the inte r 0 CFR 20 r e o ns for the i m o gical info r m oval of sys t e quately re d acted struct u m oval is co m , will be r e extent of a m ent Struct uthe structu r o f the acquis the Reacto r g Tunnels).

foot elevati n the Reacto r o n conc r ete f ted, six (6) i n l ocations w h r y area and y was less a. No remo v s of the sm e n d S y stems h for LAC B ystems and c osed metal b LACBWR is S are the re m p osed by th e walls floors o nd the re m e nt, the one pit. Conse q e vation wil l on and disp o i ve charact e e removed p r r iors of stru c equirements mplementati rmation fro m tems and th e d uced radio l ures will be m plete, the s r e-surveyed a dditional r e u res Below 6 ral surfaces ition and ra d r Building, In June and on concrete r Building, t h f loor of the P n the React o h ere the cor e 2-30 the maintethan the M vable conta m ar samples.

B WR requi r components below 3 feet the 639 fo o m aining rei n e removal o f of the WTB, m ainder of foot thick p q uently, all l be remed i o sed of as c e rization w a r ior to the p etures at LA C regarding on of contr o m these s u e demolition logical con d demolishe dtructures th ato determi emediation r 36 Foot Ele vof baseme n diological a nWTB and July of 201 5 floor and t he 630 foot P iping Tun n o r Building, e samples w e e nance area

.M DC of 74 mination w a r es the de m to a depth o below gra d o t elevation.

n forced con c f the interio r the remain i the Pipin g p ortion of t hsystems an d iated, disas s clean demol i as or will b erformance o C BWR are rthe postin g ols for the p r urveys will of impacte d ditions to l e d, packaged at will rema i i ne the co n r equired, if a vation n ts that wi l n alysis of c o the balanc e 5 , a series o t he concret e elevation c o n els. A totalthree (3) in ere taken ar

e. The res udpm/100c m as identified m olition an d of at least 3 de will also b The only s t crete walls a r concrete a n ing reinforc e g and Ven t he Chimne y d compone n sembled an d i tion debris, b e perform e of FRS. r outinely pe r g of areas rotection o f provide t h d structures a e vels suitab l and proper l i n at license n centrations any, to mee t ll remain i n o ncrete core e of the ba s f concrete c o e floor and o ncrete floo r l of twelve (

the WTB a n e shown in F ults of all d m 2 for alph a at concentr a d removal o feet below g b e removed.

tructures th a a nd floors o nd steel lin e e d concrete tilation Tu n y Foundatio n n ts and stru c d/or demol iclean salv a ed of equip m rformed to e nand to id e f workers in he basis fo r at the site.

Wle for cont r l y disposed terminatio n of the re s t the unrest r n the "end-ssamples fro m sement stru c o re samples east wall o r of the WT B 12) concret e nd three (3) i F igures 2-9.

d irect a and ations of all grade. The a t will of the er, the walls n nels, n, the ctural i shed, age or m ent, n sure entify these r the W hen r olled of as n , i.e., sidual ricted state" m the ctures were n the B and e core in the La Cros s License T Revisio n The loc a conditio nvolumet r elevated wall su r discolor a that ex h conditio nthere wa s radionuc The con c Test Am eROC. I n Reactor B and #00 2 concrete analysis positivel y 59, Tc-9 9 concrete 2.3.6.2.A concr e Turbine contami nin the T Analysis 0.106 p C 2.3.6.3.As state d subjecte d graded s u As repo r radioacti vbuilding located iAdminis tproximit y laborato r Charact e beta-ga m gross be t s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ations select e n or obser v ric contamin observed c o faces were a tion or sta n hibited the h n for concr e s sufficient s lide fractio n c rete pucks r e rica Labor a n addition, B uilding sa m 2 were als ocores is p r of the conc y detected a t 9, Pu-238, Pcore sampl e Turbi n ete core wa s Building T n ation event T urbine Bui lof this sa m C i/g and H-3 LAC B d previousl y d to FRS. I n ur vey appro a r ted in the H v e spills or has primari l i n the buil d tration Buil d y to the LS E r y. rization sur v mma/alpha a ta-gamma/a l W ater Reacto r Plan e d for conc r v ed radiolo gation of the o ntact dose r used to i d n ding water.

h ighest pot e te in each s source term n s of gamma r epresentin g atory for ga m the concret e mple locatio o sent for i s resented in rete core s a t concentrat i P u-239/240, e s is present e n e Building s obtained a s T unnel to cited in the lding and t m ple indicat e at 1.71 pCi

/BWR Admi n y, the LAC B n stead, thes e ach in accor d H SA, there wradioactive l y b een use d ding that su p ding was i n E, occupanc y veys of the c tivity of i n l pha activity r r ete core sa m gical meas u concrete.

W r ates or cou n d entify pote n The goal wential of r e s urvey unit.in the cores emitters as w g the first 1/2 m ma spectr o e pucks re p ns #001, #0 s otopic anal y Table 2-16.

amples incl u i ons greater Pu-241, A m e d in Refere n Tunnel s part of th eattempt to HSA pertai n t he potentia l e d detectabl e/g. nistration B u BWR Admi n e two struct u dance with M was no past contaminat i d for office s p p ported bot h n itially clas s y by LACB W LACBWR nterior floo r were also p 2-31 m pling were urements i n W hen possib l n t rates. In a ntial locati o was to iden t e presenting This judgto achieve t w ell as HT Dinch of con c o scopy and H p resenting t h 0 3, #005 an ysis. A su m Significa n u de Ni-63, Hthan their r e m-241 and A nce 16. e 2014 char a evaluate ning to the d l radiologi c e concentrat uilding nistration B u ures will be M ARSAM E history of t h i on in the L A p ace and re c h LACBW R sifie d as a M W R person nAdministra t r s surfaces a performed o n biased tow n dicated th e le, locations a ddition, vis o ns of sur f tify, to the ethe worst gmental sa mp the sensitivi t D radionucli d c rete at eac h H TD analys e h e concrete n d #006 and mmary of t n t HTD ra d H-3 and Sr-9 espective M D Am-243. An a cterization the possib l d iscovery o f cal contami n tions of Cs-1 u ilding and surveyed fo E guidance.

h e use of u nACBWR A c ords storag e R and G-3 M ARSSIM nel and the p tion Buildi n a nd the roo f n the roof, o n w ard locatio n e presence we re deter m s ual observa t f ace conta m e xtent possi b case boun d m pling appro ties require d d es. h sample lo c es for beta a n deeper tha nWTB samp t he analytic a dionuclides i 9 0. The ot h DC include; analysis of survey fro m le extent o f cracked dr a n ation of s u 1 37 at 0.35 2 G-3 Crib H or unrestrict e nsealed radi odministrati o e. An envir o operations. Class 2 str u resence of t h n g included

f. Direct mn floor tiles n s where ph y of fixed a m ined based tions of flo o m ination, su c ble, the loc a d ing radiol o ach also en d to determi n c ation was s e nd alpha e m n 1/2 inch d ele locations al results f o i dentified b y h er radionu cC-14, Fe-5 5the results o m the floor o of a radio a ain system p u rrounding 2 pCi/g, Co

-H ouse will n e d release u s oactive mat e o n Building.

onmental la b The LAC B u cture due t h e environ ma scan for measuremen t and around ysical a nd/or upon o r and c h as a tions ogical sured n e the ent to m itting e ep at #001 or the y the c lides 5, Ni-of the of the active p iping soils. -60 at not be s ing a erials, The b was B WR to its m ental gross t s for floor La Cros s License T Revisio n drain op e each dir e The res u 4,915 dp mthe seco nimbedde d gamma s was the n and sec ofrom les s and dire observe d Beta s c 2,261 dp mfrom les s Direct b e of 243 dmeasure midentifie d 2.3.7.S Section 8 hydroge o was der i Haley &

(18) sup p 2.3.7.1.For a di towns a n river wa t Lansing, water f o approxi m The LA C well at t h state per m LACB W Building areas ar e to the g r pathway s e Boiling W Termination n 0 e nings. A s m ect measure m u lts of the m/100cm 2 w n d floor h a d in a floor s pectroscop y n performed o nd floor la m s than MDC ct alpha re d reading of 7 cans of t h m/100cm 2 w s than MD C e ta-gamma m dpm/100c m 2 m ents were d concentrat i urface and 8.5 in Cha p o logy and h y i ved directl y Aldrich, H y p lements th e Area Gro u stance of 4 0 nd cities alo n t er for indu s Iowa, abou t o r industri a m ately 40 m i C BWR site he site. San i m itted sani t WR Adminis. Storm w a e periodicall y r ound area s uafter passin g W ater Reacto r Plan mear sampl e m ent. beta scans w ith a scan M a llway, a ditile. The c y. The anal y involving t h m inated wo o of 329 dp m adings ran g 72 dpm/100 c h e roof ar e w ith a scan M C of 113 dp m measuremen tto a maxi mall less tha n ions greater Groundwa t p te r 8 of t y drology of y from Hal y drogeologi c e preliminar y u ndwater U s 0 miles do w ng the Missi s s trial purpo s t 15 miles d a l purposes les downstr e has its own itary wastes t ary wastes h t ration Bui l a ter runoff i s y monitore d u rrounding t g through a n r e for remov aof the in t M DC of 2,1 0screte radi o contaminate d ysis of the t i h e acquisitio o d, carpet, a m/100c m 2 to ged from l e cm 2. e a indicat e M DC of 2,2 6 m/100c m 2 t o t s taken on t mum obser v n MDC of 4than MDC b t er h is LTP cZNPS and e e y & Aldr i cal Investig a y findings i n s e wnstream of s sippi River s es, excludi n downstream o between t e am. potable w aare collect e hauler. Th i l ding and a s diverted d i d for oil she e t he facility v n oil separat o 2-32 a ble conta m terior surfa c 00 dpm/100 c oactive part i d portion o f ile identifie dn of ten (10

)a nd floor ti la maximu m e ss than M D ed results 61 dpm/100 c o a maximu m the floor dr a v ed readin g 42 dpm/100 c b y the analy ontains a s e nvirons.

T i ch, Hydro g a tion Report n Reference 1the site, vi rare obtaine d ng the adja c of the site.

t he LACB W a ter supply, pd in a solid s is includes a a sanitary h irectly to th e n and disc o v ia downsp o or located i n m ination was c es ranged cm 2. Durin g icle was di s f the tile w a d 0.005 uCi

) biase d dir e l e. Direct b m observed r e D C of 39 d ranging f r cm 2. Direc t m observed ain opening s g of 333 d p cm 2. No r esis of the s msummary d The informa t geological C tfor the La C 17. rtually all m d from grou n c ent G-3 pl a There are n W R site a n provided th r s holding ta n a sanitary h o h olding tan k h e Mississip p oloration.

R o uts or ente n side the LS E also taken from 1,42 0 g the scan o f scovered.

T a s removed of Cs-137.

ect measure m b et a-gamma eading of 5, dpm/100c m 2 rom 1,872 t alpha mea s reading of 1 s ranged fro m pm/100c m 2 a emovable c o mear sample s d escription t ion contain e C onceptual S C rosse Boili n m unicipal w und water.

T ant, is the c o n o other kno w n d Prairie r ough a sin g nk and pum p olding tank k that serv i p i River at o R oof drains d r the norm a E. at the locati 0 dpm/100c m f the north e T he particl eand analyz eAn investi g ments on th e readings r a ,743 dpm/1 0to a max idpm/100c m s ure m ents r a 152 dpm/10 0 m less than M a nd direct ontaminatio n s. of the ge o ed in this s e S ite Mode l n g Water R e w ater suppli e The nearest u oal-fired pl a w n users o f du Chien, g le ground w p ed off by a that servic e i ces the T u o utfalls. R e discharge di r a l effluent r e on of m 2 to e nd of e was e d by gation e first a nged 0 0c m 2 imum m 2 to a nged 0 c m 2. MDC alpha n was o logy, e ction (17). e acto r e s for u se of a nt in friver WI, w ater local es the urbine e lease rectly e lease La Cros s License T Revisio n 2.3.7.2.Regiona l Mississi p parallels upward; river sta gdemonst r river sta g Ground w surface (

Ground wthe Miss imay tur nchemica lthe shall o Based o n of the G-located i monitori n a slightl y has a d o gradient towards t there ar e stages. G Reactor B are belo w During p was co mpermeab i b uilding ssoils wil lwill cir c localize d outside t h other ha n or burie d underlyi n shallow scontami n soils wit h orders o f s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Groundw l ly, ground w ppi river.

Cthe river.

U however, t h ge data com p r ates that th e g e impacts t h w ater beneat h bgs) and th e w ater in the s i ssippi Rive n and flow l constituent ow system.

n a review o f-3 Ash Lan d i n the sou t ng wells (B 1 y downward o wnward g r at well pair t he river ba s e some peri o G roundwate r B uilding ba w the water t plant constr u mpacted, red u ility can de c s. The resu l l flow at a s cumnavigate d flow regi m h e footprint n d, potentia l d piling, wil l n g ground w soils from p n ation. The h in the sup p f magnitude W ater Reacto r Plan ater Flow w ater flows i Closer to t h U nder typic he vertical g r p ared to w a e shallow a q h e water tab l h the site is e groundwa t s hallow dep or. The dee pparallel to s would occ u f the groun d dfill area gro u t h side of t 1 1AR/B11 R vertical gr a r adient at w B9/B9A. T sin with a l o o ds where t r flow thro u sement shel table during u ction, and m ucing the ef f c rease the h lting impact slower velo cthe area, e m es on conta mof these st r l releases th a l likely tak e w ate r. This precipitation

,average sh a p ort pilings, lower. r i n a wester l he shore, g r al river sta g r adient reve r ter table el e quifer is in d i l e elevation. first encou n t e r is in dir e osits and fil l p er ground wthe river.

u r at or nea r dwater eleva t u ndwater m o t he LACB W) to the east adient. Duri n w ell pairs B T his is expe c o calized infl u the gradient s u gh the LA C l) as well a s high and lo w m ore specif i f ective poro s h ydraulic co n to ground w city, and re g effectively b minant fate a r uctures wil l at occurred w much long e is further c , creating a n allow aquife r the hydraul 2-33 l y direction r oundwater g e, groundw r ses during f evations me a i rect hydrau ntered at a n e ct hydrauli c l material fl o water is also Because t h r the surface tion measur e o nitoring w e W R site, a n of and up g r n g times of n B 11R/B11A R c ted as gro u u ence at B9

/s are rever s C BWR site i s s the deep p w river stag e ically the in s s ity and per m n ductivity o w ater flow i s gionally, a s i b ypassing t h a nd transpo r l likely be d within the f o er to migrat e compounde d n area that w r hydraulic c ic conducti vfrom the b lmay also h w ater gradie n f lood stages

.a sure in LA C ulic commu n n average d e c communic a o ws towardslikely to fl o he potentia l, the release ements coll e e lls (# B2/B 3 nd associat e r adient of L A normal and R and B2/B u ndwater fl o/B9A from t sed; and thi s s impacted b pilings that s e conditions

.stallation o f m eability o f o f the aquif e s that groun d i gnificant p e these soils.

r t are that p o d eflected an d o otprint of t h e both in th d as the ov e w ill likely r e c onductivit y v ity would b l uffs on the h ave a flow nts near the

. The geolo g C BWR site n ication wit h epth of 20 f e ation with t h s the west a n o w towards t l releases o f s would lik e e cted during 3/B9A/B9/B e d backgro u A CBWR, t h low river st a B3, with an o ws generall y t he adjacen t s is likely d b y deeper s t s upport the

. f the suppor t f the soils.

T er within th e dwater with i ercentage o f The impl i otential rele a d flow arou n he building se vadose z o erlying stru c e tain any po y is 313 feet b e expected east towar dcomponen triver are sl i g ical and hi smonitoring h the river a n e et below g r he adjacent n d discharge s t he west bu t f radiologi c e ly be confi nroutine sa m B 7/B8), whi c u nd ground w h ere appea r s a ge, ground w upward v e y from the b t inlet. Ho w d ue to high tructures (i.

estructures, w t pilings, th e T his reduct i e footprint o in the comp f the flow r e i cations of ases that oc c nd them. O s, via floor d o ne as well a ctures isola t tentially rel e per day. F o to be one t o ds the t that ightly storic wells nd the round river. s into t then cal or ned to m pling c h are w ater to be w ater ertical bluffs w ever, river e., the w hich e soil i on in of the p acted egime these curred On the drains a s the t e the eased or the o two La Cros s License T Revisio n The vel o gradient.across t h Therefor the inc h Environ m show se astage. T h LACB Wvicinity structure directio n 2.3.7.3.Historic a monitori n monitori n monitori n Dairylan Of the w LACB Wroutine b designat e Environ m G-3 Fos s Nos. 3, 4 levels re 3.0E-08 µDuring t h to the s radioacti v The wel l suspecte dthat sam p As note Activitie s wells to monitori n if groun d located ninterval o b elow g r B. s e Boiling W Termination n 0 o city of gr o The gradi e h e site, grou n e, it is likel y hes and fe e m ental Mon i a sonal vari a hese wells a WR site struc t of suspect s/foundatio n ns. Previous I a lly, the LA C n g wells. F n g wells lo c n g wells o fd for radiol o w ells show n W R facilities basis. The g r e d as B-2, m ental Mon i s il Station o p 4 and 5 we r ported duri nµCi/ml to 9.

h e recovery outh of th e v e liquids f r l-point sho w d leakage.

T p le are pres e d in the L s Report (D support gr o ng wells (1 0 d water qua l n ominally w i o f 15 to 25 f r ade. These W ater Reacto r Plan o undwater i s e nt of the w a ndwater mo n y that the gr o e t/day rang i toring Pro g a tion on up w are not suffi c tures or are abroken dr a ns or variat i Investigatio n CBWR Lic eigure 2-11 i c ated on th ff the LAC B o gical purpo n on Figure were histo r r oundwater m B-3, B-7, i toring staff p e r ational r e r e routinely ng this mo n 0E-08 µCi/

m of a probab e Turbine B rom suspect w n on Figure T he well-po e nted in Tab l L ACBWR D D-Plan/PSD A o undwater e 0 wells total

)ity had be e ithin five (5

)f eet below g wells are s h r s directly r ater table is i n itoring has o undwater ve). Ground g ram wells a w ard and d o cient to cha r as where pot e ain lines) c o i ons in fill m n s ensed Site h allustrates th ee LACBW R B WR site t ses. 2-11, only P r ically moni t m onito r ing w B-8, B-9, on a routin e equirements. monitored f n itoring per i m l). le spill inci d B uilding.

T broken drai n 2-11 was e s int was sa m l e 2-17. Th i D ecommissi o AR) (19), D e valuation.

) were insta l e n impacted

) feet of on e g rade and o n h ow on Fig u 2-34 e lated to b onfluenced b yshown that v elocity acr o w ater elev a agree with t o wnward gr a racterize the ential releas o uld have o materials c o a s had seve r e current lo c R site. Th e that are or P otable W a t ored by D a wells and b a B-9A, B11 A e basis for n o During L A f or gross b e i od was les s d ent in 1983 T his incide n n lines in th s tablished d o mpled once o i s well-poin t o ning Plan airyland re cIn Novem b lled within t by plant o e another co n n e deep well ure 2-11 as M o th the hy d y the topog r the water t a oss the site i s a tion data t he regional adients that groundwat ees associate d occurred. I n ould locally r al potable w c ation of po e re is no p o have been a ter Wells N a iryland for a ckground g r AR, and B o n-radiologi A CBWR op e e ta activity.

s than or e q, a tempora r nt concern e e Turbine B o wn gradie n on May 3, 1 9 t has since b e and Post-S cently insta l b e r 2012, fi t he LACB W o pe r ations. n sist of one with a scre e MW 200A a n draulic con d r aphy; and, w able has a vs also relati vfrom the groundwat e are influe n e r flow belo w d with LAC n these are ainfluence g water wells otable water otable wate rmonitored Nos. 3 and 4 radiologica l r oundwater B 11R are m ical paramet e e rations, Pot a Typical g r q ual to MD r y well-poi n e d the pot e Building to s u nt and belo w 9 83. The a n een abando n S hutdown D l led ground w ive (5) pair s WR licensed The well p shallow we l e ned interv a n d B throug ductivity an d with the flat ery low gra d v ely slow (i

.G-3 Coal e r flow, an d nced by the w and arou n BWR (i.e., i a s, pilings, g roundwater and ground w and ground w r or ground w by Solutio n 4 which ser v l conditions monitoring m onitored b y e rs to supp o a ble Water W r oss beta a c DC (ranging nt was estab l e ntial leaka g u b-b uilding w the grade o nalysis resul ned. D ecommissi o water moni t s of ground wsite to dete r pairs which l l with a scr e al of 45 to 5 5 h MW-204 A d the areas dient. .e., in Plant d also river n d the in the deep flow w ater w ater w ater n s o r viced on a wells y the ort the Wells c tivity from lished g e of soils. of the ts for o ning t oring w ater rmine were eened 5 feet A and La Cros s License T Revisio n Two (2) in June ground w 90 and C In June o through 2 and B11 several r fourth r o Potable samples transura n of the gr o Additio n 18. 2.3.7.4.The LA C twice p e ground w the MW-The coll eDM pR g r 2.3.7.5.

Ground w (5 pairs) samplin g wells M WNovemb epositivel y ranging Novemb e during t h During t hMW-20 2 Sr-90 w s e Boiling W Termination n 0 rounds of g r 2 013 and t h w ate r sample s C s-137. Anal y o f 2014, a t 2 04 A and B A R. Thes e r adionuclide o und of gr oWell #5, a n were sent o n ic radionuc l o undwater s a nal details, i n On-Goin g CBWR Site g er year for r w ater is at re l-200A/B thr u e cted infor m D epth to gro u M onitoring w otential/tur b Radiological r oundwater Sum m w ater charac t within the g in 2013.

H W-201A an d er of 2013 y detected i from 1.43 p er 2013 sa m h e 2013 sam p h e June 201 2A, MW-20 3 w as also po W ater Reacto r Plan roundwater h en during s were sent y sis for H-3 t hird round o B; Potable W e collected g s including o undwater w n d Monitor i o ff for radi o lides. Tabl e amples and r n cluding th e g Investigati o g roundwate r r adiological l atively hig h u MW-204 A m ation durin g und water in w ell ground w bidity/dissol vsample info rsample coll e m ary of Gro u terization e ff LSE area H-3 was posi d B, MW-2 0 at concentr a in the same pCi/L to 2.

1 m pling perio d p ling period 4 sample p e 3 A and M W sitively det r samples we r a seasonal lto an off-si t was perfor m o f groundw a Water Wells

groundwater HTD and t w ere collect e i ng Wells B ological an a es 2-18 and 2 results. e off-site an a ons r monitorin g analysis p u h er and low e A/B wells as g each moni tthe respect i w ater pH/sp e v ed oxygen/

t rmation inc l ection. u ndwater A n fforts comm ein Novem b tively detec t 0 2-A and B, a tions rang iwells duri n 18 pCi/L; h o d. Co-60 a

n. eriod, H-3 w W-203B) at c e cted in w 2-35 r e collected l ow ground w te laborator y m ed on site.

ater sample s#3, 4, 5, and samples w t ransuranic r ed from: M B 11R and B alysis of se v 2-19 provid e alytical labo r g program c o u rposes onl y er elevations shown on F toring interv ive monitori n e cific condu c temperature

.l uding a co m n alytical Re s e nce d throu g b e r 2012 a n t e d at conce nMW-203A i ng fro m 1 5 n g the June o wever, it w n d Cs-137 w was positivel yoncentratio n wells MW-2 0 in 2013, d u w ater level y for radiol o s was colle c 7; and Mo n ere sent of f radionuclid e MW 200A a n B 11AR. T v eral radio n es a summa rratory repo r onsists of o b y from exis. The moni

igure 2-11.

val includes:

ng well. c tance/oxid

a. m pleted chai n sults gh the instal l n d the co m n tration gre a and B and M 50 pCi/L to 2013 samp l w as not po were not po y detected i n n s ranging fr02A, MW-2 u ring the se a in Novem b ogical analy s cted from:

M nitoring Wel l f for radiol o es. In Sept e n d B throu g T hese colle c nuclides inc l r y of the rad i r ts are provi b taining gro u ting monit otoring well s a tion and re d n of custod y l ation of 10 mmencement ater than M D MW-204A a 660 pCi/L.

l ing period a ositively det esitively det e n fou r (4) w from 245 pC 203A and a sonal high w b er 2013.

T s is for Co-6 0 MW-200A a l s B2, B-3, B ogical analy s ember of 2 0 g h 204A a n c ted ground w l uding HT D i ological an a ded in Refe r u ndwater sa m o ring wells w s sample d in d uction y following monitoring of ground w D C in moni t a nd B in Jun S r-90 wa sat concentr aected durin g ected in an y wells (MW-B i/L to 336 pMW-204A w ater T hese 0 , S r-a nd B B11R sis of 0 14 a n d B, w ater D and a lysis r ence m ples when clude wells w ater t oring e and s also ations g the y well B 11R, p Ci/L. with La Cros s License T Revisio n concentr aAm-241 During t greater t h concentr a were als o 2.4.C The sur v deferred.

under co that will basemen tillustrate

defer th e conditio nALARA data wo uareas), Safe tHist oAcc e struc tinter fThe a phys i cond i As acce s will be c ofor the s radionuc and HT D events c a of a sur v stored i nvalidatin As deco m surface d for ope ndocume n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 a tions rangi n were also p o h e Septem b han MDC i n a tion of 1.1 4 o positively d C ontinuin g C vey of many Example s ncrete or as p remain an d t after line rs buried pi p e characteri z n s: considerati o u ld likely no t t y considera t orical data s h ss for chara c t ures or oth e f ere with co n a bility to us e ical relation s i tions repre s ss is gained o llected, ev a s urvey unit.

l ides presen t D radionucli d a used by eq u v ey unit(s) w n the chara cg the initial mmissionin g decontamin a n ai r demoli t n ted survey a W ater Reacto r Plan ng from 1.1 o sitively det b er 2014 sa m n any well.

4 pCi/L. C o detected at r C haracteri zinaccessibl e s of areas w p halt coveri n d be subje c r removal a n ping system s z ation of a o ns (e.g., th e t change th e tions, hows that th e cterization w e r obstacles w n tinued ope r e engineerin g s hip to surr o sented b y th eto areas th a a luated and s This data t and updat e des. In add i uipment fail u w ill be rec oterization dclassificatio g proceeds, a tion (as we l t ion or unr e and a forma l r 12 pCi/L to ected at resi mple period

, S r-90 was o-60, Ni-63

, residual con c zation e or not rea d where surve y ngs, structu r cted to FRS n d the inte r s that may rsoil or str u e area is eit h e survey are a e area could w ould requir e w here the r e r ation of op e g judgment i o unding area e conditions at were pre v stored with-o will be us e e the variabi l ition, as the u res or pers o o rde d. The s atabase. T h n and in pla nareas will, l l as fixed c o e stricted rel e l turnover w 2-36 2.01 pCi/L.

dual conce n , H-3 was npositively d , Cs-137, E u centrations i n dily accessi b y s are defer r ral wall and , the under l r iors of bur remain in t h ucture was b her a radiat i a or area cla sbe classifie d e significan t emoval coul d erating syste m i n assigning s and the li kin these adj a v iously inac c o ther radiol o e d along w i l ity in the r adecommiss onnel errors

, se events w h is addition a nning for th eas necessa r ontaminatio n ease. Whe n will be made C-14, Tc-9 n trations in s e not positive l d etected in o u-152, Eu-1 5 n several w e b le subsurfa r red include floor surfa c r lying concr r ied pipe th a h e en d-state based on o n i on or cont assification o d without fu r t deconstruc t d result in a n m s, o r the area a c l k elihood of t h acent areas.

cessible, ad d ogical surve y ith existing a dionuclide m ioning prog r , which ma y w ill be eval ual characte r e FRS. r y, be deco n n) to levels n a structur by the Radi 9 9, Eu-152, everal wells l y detected a o ne (1) wel l 5 4, Pu-239/

2 e lls. a ce soils or s soils unde r ces in some r ete in the R a t may re m condition.

ne or more amination ar e of the locati orther charac t t ion of adja c n unsafe co nlassificatio n h e area to h a ditional cha r y data in a sdata to up d m ix for bot h resses, data y affect the r a u ated and, w rization dat a ntaminated that will m e e is ready f ological Pr o Pu-239/24

0. at concentr a l , MW-200 A 2 40 and A m s urfaces has r structures, of the base m R eactor Bu i m ain. Figur e The decisiof the foll o e a and addi t on or surrou n terization, cent system s n dition or n based on ave radiolo g r acterizatio n urvey histo r date the ty p h gamma-e m fro m opera t a diological s w hen appro p a will be us to remove e et the cond i for demoliti o tection gro u 0 and ations A at a m-241 been soils m ents ilding e 2-3 on to owing t ional n ding s , gical n data r y file p es of m itting tional s tatus priate, ed in loose i tions i on, a u p for La Cros s License T Revisio n the com p are suita b Followi n a "turno v acceptan transferr e perform amay incl u The "tur n survey p e survey d a turnover , survey p met. Th eApp r actio nApp rApp r with App r radi oData additApp r 2.5.R 1. U C 2 2. U R 3. U C o 4. E C 5. E S s e Boiling W Termination n 0 p any prefor m ble. ng the demo l v er assessm e ce criteria w e d to Chara c a nce of the F u de a "turn o n over surv e erformed, r e ata prior to c , and FRS), alans will c o e se objectiv e r opriate inst r n level and/

o r opriate inst r r opriate survthe calibrati r opriate sam p nuclide rati oanalysis cri t i onal sampl e r opriate clas s References U.S. Nuclear C ontent of L i 011. U.S. Nuclear Radiation Su r U.S. Nuclear C onsolidated f Radiologi c E nergySoluti C rosse Boili n E nergySoluti ite Cha r act e W ater Reacto r Plan ming demol i lition and/o r e nt" will be p will be met

, cterization/

L F RS. Other w over survey," e y" process, epresent at l e c onducting t a document e ontain the a p e s include:

rument sele c or release c r i rument qual iey techniqu eon methodo l ple collecti o os, teria to iden t es and, sification of Regulatory i cense Term iRegulatory r vey and Sit eRegulatory Decommis s c al Criteria, F ons PG-EO-ng Water Re a ons GP-EO-erization Pro j r ition, valida t r remediatio n performed.

I , then phys i License Ter m wise, additi o" primarily fotogether w i e ast one, bu t t he FRS. F o e d survey pl ppropriate d a ction to ensu r iteria, ity control m e s to ensure logies, n and analy s tify follow-uthe survey aCommissio n i nation PlanCommissio n e Investigat iCommissio n s ioning Gui d F inal Repor t-313196-SV a ctor. -313196-Q A j ect (QAPP)2-37 ting that th e n , and when If the result s i cal and ad m m ination gro u onal remedi a fo r Class 1 a n i th any add i t possibly s e or each type an will be d a ta assessm e re the prope r m easures to ethat the fiel d sis to deter m up actions s u area. n , Regulato r s for Nucle a n, NUREG-1 i on Manual (n, NUREG-1 d ance - Cha r t - Septemb e-PL-001, C h A-PL-001, Q u). e radiologic a n an area is b s of this ass e ministrative u p personneation may b n d 2 areas witional char a e veral, oppo of survey (c developed us e nt to ensu r r sensitivity e nsure opera b d measurem m ine spatial v uch as reme d r y Guide 1.1 a r Power Re a 1575, Revis i (MARSSI M 1757, Volu m racterization e r 2006. h aracterizati o u ality Assu r al condition believed to b essment ind icontrol of l for prepar a be required.

w ithin the L S a cterization o rtunities to c c haracteriza t ing the DQ O re that seve rrelative to t h bility, ent techniq u variability a n d iation and t h 79, Standar d actors, Revi s i on 1, Multi

-M), August 2 0 m e 2, Revisi o, Survey, a n o n Survey P rance Projec t s in the str u be ready for i cate that th e the area w i ation, desig n This asses s S E. and remed i collect addi t tion, remedi a O process.

T ral objectiv e h e applicab l ues are cons i n d variabilit y h e collectio n d Format an d s ion 1 - Jun e-Agency 0 00. o n 1, nd Determin a Plan for the L t Plan LAC B ucture FRS, e FRS i ll be n , and sment i ation t ional ation, T hese es are l e istent y in n of d e a tion L a B WR La Cros s License T Revisio n 6. E W 7. D S 8. U R D9. S C 10. E 1 11. U L 12. U R T 13. E S 14. E S 15. Z F 16. E C 17. H 3 18. H R 2 19. D D20. I n E 1 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 E nergySoluti W ater React o Dairyland PoAFSTOR - U.S. Nuclear Radiation Su r December 2 0 andia Natio n Contaminati o E nergySoluti0 Detector S U.S. Nuclear L aboratory A U.S. Nuclear Radiological Termination)

E nergySoluti urvey Repo r E nergySoluti urvey Repo r Z ionSolutionallout in So i E nergySoluti C oncern Dur i H aley & Ald r 0, 2012.

H aley & Ald r R eactor, Dai r 015. Dairyland Po Decommissi o nternational Emitters (ma x 998. W ater Reacto r Plan ons Techni c or Historical wer Corpor aDecember 2Regulatory r vey and As 0 06. n al Laborat o on From De c ons Techni c Sensitivity. Regulatory Analytical Pr oRegulatory Monitoring

- Effluent S ons GG-EO-rt for Octob e ons LC-RS-r t for June t h s Technical i ls at Zion S t ons Techni c i ng LACB W r ich, Hydro g r ich Inc., H y r yland Powe wer Cooper a o ning Activi t Standard IS ximum beta r c al Support D Site Assess m a tion LAC-T 2 009. Commissio nsessment of o ry, NURE G commission i c al Support DCommissio n otocols Ma nCommissio nPrograms (I Streams and

-313196-R S e r and Nove m PN-164017-h ru August 2 Support Do c t ation. c al Support D W R Decom m geological C y drogeologi c r Cooperati v a tive, LAC B ties Report (O 7503-1, Penergy gre a 2-38 Document R m ent (HSA)T R-138, Init i n NUREG-1Materials a n G/CR-5512, V ing Paramet e Document R n, NUREG-1 n ual (MAR L n Regulator y I nception T h the Enviro n S-RP-001, L A m ber 2014 F-001, LAC B 2 015 Field W cument 13-0 Document R m issioning.

onceptual S i cal Investig a v e, Genoa W B WR Deco m (D-Plan/PS D P art 1, Evalu a a ter than 0.1 5 R S-TD-3131 9). i al Site Cha r 1 575, Suppl e nd Equipme n Volume 3, R e r Analysis

-R S-TD-3131 9 1576, Multi

-L AP) - Aug u y Guide 4.1 5 h rough Nor m nment - July A CBWR R a Field Work

-B WR Radiol o W ork - Nov e 004, Exami n R S-TD-3131 9 ite Model, F a tion Report

, Wisconsin, F i mmissioning D AR), Revi s ation of Sur f 5 MeV) and 9 6-003, La C racterizatio n ement 1, M u nt Manual (M R esidual Ra d- October 1 9 9 6-006, Lu d-Agency Ra d u st 2001.

5 , Quality A m al Operatio 2007. a diological C- Novembe r o gical Char a ember 2015.

nation of Cs-9 6-001, Ra d F ile No. 387 0 , La Crosse B i le No. 387 0 Plan and P o s ion - Marc h f ace Conta mAlpha-Emi t C rosse Boili n n Survey for u lti-Agency M ARSAM E d ioactive 9 99. dlum Model 4 d iological ssurance or ns to Licen s C haracteriza t r 2015. a cterization

137 Global d ionuclides o 0 5-001 - A u Boiling Wat 0 5-008, Janu o st Shutdow n h 2014. m ination, Be t t ters - Aug u n g E) - 4 4-s e t ion o f u gust t er ary n t a-u st La Cros s License T Revisio n Survey Unit ID #L10101 0 L10101 0 L10101 0 L10101 0 L20111 0 L20111 0 L30121 0 L30121 0 L30121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 L40121 0 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 # Surve y 0 1 Reacto r Stack G 0 2 Turbin e Diesel G 03 LSA B u 0 4 North L 0 1 LACB W Crib H o 0 2 G-3 Cr i Discha r 0 1 North E 0 2 Trans m 0 9 Plant A 03 G-3 Co 05 Coal Pi 0 6 Cappe d 0 7 Groun d 08 Hwy 3 5 W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-1 y Unit Desc r L A r Building, W G rounds e Building, T G enerator B u u ilding, Mai L SE Ground s WR Admini s o use, Wareh i b House, L A rge Line, Ar e E nd of Lice n m ission Swit c Access, ISFS I al Plant Gr o le Grounds d Ash Impo u d s East of Hi 5/Railroad R r LACB W ription ACBWR Si t WTB, WGT V T urbine Offi u ilding Gro untenance E a s LSE Buf f s tration Bui l ouse Groun d A CBWR Ci r e a South of L Cla s nsed Site c hyard Area I Haul Roa d Non-I m o unds undment Gr o ghway 35 Right of Wa y 2-39 W R Open L t e Enclosur e V , Ventilati o ce Building

, u nds at Shack Gr o f er Zone Gr o lding, LAC B d s r c. Water L SE Fence s s 3 Ground s d Grounds m pacted Gro u o unds y Grounds L and Surve y C l e Grounds o n , 1B o unds o unds BWR s u nds N o N o N o N o N o y Units Initial lassificatio nClass 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 1 Class 2 Class 2 Class 3 Class 3 Class 3 on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d on-Impacte d n Approxi m Surve y U Area (m 1,99 2 2,31 5 1,74 9 2,38 7 7,21 1 6,78 5 24,04 11,71 31,01 d 66,86 d 82,89 d 111,8 9 d 81,25 d 9,44 4 m ate U nit m 2) 2 5 9 7 1 5 2 1 2 9 4 9 9 4 4 La Cros s License T Revisio n Surv e B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B10 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B20 1 B30 1 B30 1 B30 1 B30 1 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ey Unit 1 0001 1 0002 1 0003 1 0004 1 0005 1 0006 1 0007 1 0008 1 0009 1 0101 1 0102 1 0103 1 0104 1 0105 1 0106 1 2101 1 2102 1 2103 1 2104 W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-2 Su r W a LA C W LACBW R LACBWR M L LACB W L A L A L A B aTransmiss i Bar g r LACB W r ve y Area D Reactor B u aste Treatme n CBWR Vent i W aste Gas T a R Turbine Bl d Bld g 1B Diesel G LSA Bui l M aintenance E Pipe Tu n A CBWR C r G-3 Crib H WR Adminis t ACBWR Wa r ACBWR Wa r ACBWR Wa r a ck-up Cont r i on Sub-Sta t G-1 Crib H ge Washing B 2-40 W R Struct u D escription u ilding n t Building ilation Stac k a nk Vault d g./Turbine . Generator St r l ding Eat Shack n nel r ib House H ouse tration Buil d r ehouse #1 r ehouse #2 r ehouse #3 r ol Cente r tion Switch H H ouse Break Roo m u ral Surve y k Office ructure ding H ouse m y Units Clas s C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l C l sification lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 1 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 2 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 lass 3 La Cros s License T Revisio n G-3 R G-3 S G-3 C G-3 T G-3 E G-3 C G-3 C G-4 W G-3 L G-3 L G-3 C G-3 C G-3 V G-3 T G-3 B G-3 F G-3 F G-3 W G-3 S G-3 S#6 W s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Tabl e R eclaim Bui l S tock Out T r C oal Unload T ransfer To w E lectrical R o C rusher To w C onveyor #6 W arehouse a LRAPB Bui l Lime Silo El C AT Buildi n C oal Plant Vehicle Stor a Train She d Bottom Ash Fly Ash Silo F ly Ash Ele c Waste Silo S urge Tank Settling Tan k W ell House W ater Reacto r Plan e 2-2 (conti n l ding r ansfer Buil d ing Towe r w er A o om w e r 6 (2) a nd Electric a l ding ectrical Bui l n g a ge Buildin g Dewatering ctrical Build i k r n ued)Non Im p ding a l Room l ding g Buildings i ng 2-41 LACBWR p acted Stru c G-3 A n G-3 B o G-3 E x G-3 G a G-3 S u G-3 S u G-3 L i G-3 W G-3 A c G-3 A s G-3 B a G-3 Fl#7 We G-3 C o G-3 S a G-3 St G-3 G r G-3 A s Main P S03 T a Structural ctures n nex Buildi n oiler Fuel O i x plosive Ga s a s Room u b Station S h u b Station S h ime Storage W eigh Statio n c tive Reclai m sh Coordina ag Houses (5ammable St ll House o al Scale ample Build i t ock Out Tr a r id She d s h handling P ollution C o a nk Buildin g Surve y Un i n g i l Pump Bui s Storage R o h e d h e d Silo n m Building s a tor's Office

5) t orage She d i ng ansfer Build i Blower Bui l o ntrol Electr i g its lding oom s/ Tunnel i ng l ding ical Buildin g g La Cros s License T Revisio n Det e Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu m Ludlu mGamm a System a Bas Sta n b Fu n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 ector Mode l m 44-9 m 43-68 m o m 43-68 m o m 43-93 m o m 43-89 m o m 43-93 m o m 43-89 m o m 44-10 m 43-37 m 43-10-1 a Spectrosco ped on 1-minut e ndard, ISO 75 0 nctional equiva l W ater Reacto r Plan Table 2-3 l b M e Lud l ode Lud l ode Lud l o de ode Lud l o de ode Lud l Lud l Lud l Lud l p y e count time; a 03-1 (20).

lent instrumen t r Instrum e eter Model l um 3 l um 2350-1 l um 2350-1 l um 2360 l um 2360 l um 2350-1 l um 2350-1 lum 2929 N/A and default val u tation may be u 2-42 e nt T y pes a Applic a sc a static & sta t static & sta t sc a sc a and/sme a Ana l ues for surface u se d a nd Nomin a ation Ty (d p a n 1, 0& scan 1, 8 tic & scan 1, 8 2, 0 tic a n 3.5 6.5 a n 2, 0 or a r l ysis efficiencies ( al MDCs Ty pical Dete MDC scan p m/100cm 2)0 00 to 2,00 0 8 00 to 2,00 0 N/A 8 00 to 2,00 0 0 00 to 2,20 0 N/A 5 pCi/g 60 C o 5 pCi/g 137 C s 0 00 to 2,20 0 N/A N/A s) as specified ction Sensi t) MDC s t (dpm/10 0 N/A 0 600 to 80 to 0 0 800 to 800 to 90 to 1 90 to 1 o s N/A 0 N/A - 75-~0.10 pfor Co-6 Cs-1 3in Internation a t ivit y tatic a 0cm 2)A 700 90 900 900 1 00 1 00 A A -15 -80 p Ci/g 6 0 and 3 7 a l La Cros s License T Revisio nAnal y sis / Gamma Radionucl iIsotopic N(Np-237) Isotopic P l(Pu-238/2 3Isotopic T h(Th-228/2 3Isotopic U r(U-234/23 5Isotopic C u(Cm-243/2Isotopic A m(Am-241/2C-14 Tritium Sr-90 Pu-241 Tc-99 Gross Alp h Fe-55 Ni-63 Ni-59 s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2-4 Anal ytes ides Geptunium A lutonium 39/240) A horium 30/232) A ranium 5/238) A urium 244) A mericium 243) A L S L S G L S L S ha / Beta G L S L S L S W ater Reacto r Plan Off-Sit eTechnique Gamma Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec Alpha Spec S C S C GFPC S C S C GFPC S C S C S C r e Laborator yDOE E< 0.1p CDOE E< 0.04 pDOE E< 0.05 pDOE E< 0.05 pDOE E< 0.06 pDOE E< 0.03 pDOE E< 0.04 p EPA E E< 5.0 p C EPA 9 0< 10.0 pDOE E< 1.0 p CDOE E< 10.0 pDOE E< 2.0 p C DOE E< 10.0 pDOE E< 2.0 pCDOE E< 50.0 p 2-43 y Anal y tic aSoils (pCi

/EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g ERF C-01 C i/g 0 6.0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/ EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g EML HASL 30 0 C i/g EML HASL 30 0 p Ci/g a l Methods aMethod an d/g) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (SRW01) 0 (SRW01) a nd T y pica l d Sensitivit y Wa tEPA Method 10.0 pCi/L EML Pu-02 M1.0 pCi/L ENIC Modif i50.0 pCi/L EPA 906.0 300.0 pCi/L EICHROM M2.0 pCi/L EML Pu-01 50.0 pCi/L EICHROM T15.0 pCi/L EPA 900.0 5.0 pCi/L EML Fe-01 M100.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M15.0 pCi/L EML Ni-01 M100.0 pCi/L l MDCs ter (pCi/L) 901.1 Modifie d i e d Modified Meth o Tc-01 Modifie d Modifie d Modifie d od La Cros s License T Revisio n

s e Boiling W Termination n 0 T a Location Area West o Area South Area North Area at G-3 Area Outsi d Area at G-333 miles So Pedretti Fa r Radio Tow e Junction of East of Sto d W ater Reacto r Plan a ble 2-5 of #2 Ware h of Parking L of LACBW Gas Silo d e G-3 Offic Outfall uth at Bad A m Substatio n er Northeast Hwy O and d dard at Hw y r 2005 Dair y (on L h ouse L ot R Admin B ues (off L A xe Boat La n n East of L A of LACB W Hwy K y O Junctio n 2-44 y land Back g Licensed Sit e uilding L icensed Sit e n ding A CBWR W R n g round Stu d Co-60 (pCi/g)e) <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC e) 0.023 <MDC <MDC <MDC <MDC dy for Soils Cs-(p C 0.0 0.0 0.0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0.0-137 C i/g) 0 77 0 26 149 0 38 0 76 0 17 3 81 2 27 0 35 188 0 65 La Cros s License T Revisio n T Conditi o Undistur b Disturbe d Undistur b Disturbe d s e Boiling W Termination n 0 T able 2-6 o n and Dep t b e d d b e d d W ater Reacto r Plan Investi ga t h D No n r ative Levels Mea s D raina g e Ar 0.0.n-Draina g e 0.0.2-45 for Cs-137 s ured Ran g(pCi/g) eas Surfac e 00 to 2.80 00 to 1.67 A reas Surf a 23 to 0.66 27 to 0.34 Based on B g e R e 0-10 cm ace 0-10 c m B ack g roun d R an g e for 9 5 (p 0.4 5 0.3 5 m 0.1 5 0.23 d Studies 5% Distrib u p Ci/g) 5 to 3.63 5 to 2.86 5 to 0.77 to 0.42 u tion La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Termination n 0 Table 2*L W ater Reacto r Plan -7 Initi a Radi o H C F e N C o N S r N b T c C s E u E u E u N p P u P u P u P u A mCm-2 4 Listed half life i r a l Suite of L o nuclide H-3 C-14 e-55 i-59 o-60 i-63 r-90 b-94 c-99 -137 u-152 u-154 u-155 p-237 u-238 u-239 u-240 u-241 m-241 4 3/244* is the shortest h 2-46 LACBWR S H a half life for th e S ite-Specifi c alf Life (Ye a 1.24E+01 5.73E+03 2.70E+00 7.50E+04 5.27E+00 9.60E+01 2.91E+01 2.03E+04 2.13E+05 3.00E+01 1.33E+01 8.80E+00 4.76E+00 2.14E+06 8.78E+01 2.41E+04 6.60E+03 1.44E+01 4.32E+02 1.81E+01 e radionuclide s c Radionuc l a rs) s in the pai r lides L L R S S##M M M M S S##M M M M S A##M M M M S%M M L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S urve y Unit Surface Area Description S urface Soil

of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

S D Subsurface Soil

of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

S D Asphalt # of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

S D Surface Scans

% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-8 Surve y Uni t 66,869 m 2 G-3 Coal Pla nCo-60 3 0 0.070 0.075 0.078 0.057 0.011 Co-60 4 0 0.060 0.056 0.084 0.047 0.016 Co-60 None Taken 1% 5,550 6,700 o r Non-Impact t L4012103 n t Grounds Cs-137 3 1 0.082 0.083 0.092 0.071 0.011 Cs-137 4 1 0.048 0.038 0.081 0.036 0.022 Cs-137 ed Open Land Surve y Unit 82,894 m 2 Coal Pile GrouCo-60 3 0 0.071 0.072 0.084 0.057 0.014 Co-60 3 0 0.061 0.063 0.068 0.052 0.008 Co-60 None Taken 1% 5,050 8,800 2-47 Surve y Units -L4012105 1 nds C GCs-137 3 1 0.061 0.060 0.068 0.055 0.006 Cs-137 3 1 0.042 0.040 0.056 0.030 0.013 Cs-137 1 8 1- Characteriza tSurvey Unit L 1 11,899 m 2 C apped Ash I m G rounds Co-60 3 0 0.082 0.084 0.090 0.072 0.009 Co-60 4 0 0.081 0.083 0.102 0.056 0.021 Co-60 2 0 0.073 0.073 0.082 0.065 0.012 1% 8 ,340 1 2,000 tion Surve y S u L4012106 8 m poundment G HCs-137 3 2 0.100 0.099 0.121 0.079 0.021 Cs-137 4 2 0.088 0.084 0.130 0.054 0.037 Cs-137 2 0 0.062 0.062 0.084 0.040 0.031 u mmar y Survey Unit L 8 1,254m 2 G rounds East o f H ighway 35 Co-60 3 0 0.080 0.079 0.089 0.072 0.009 Co-60 3 0 0.081 0.069 0.106 0.068 0.022 Co-60 None Ta k 1% 8,0009,080 L4012107 fCs-137 3 3 0.264 0.263 0.463 0.065 0.199 Cs-137 3 2 0.068 0.057 0.091 0.056 0.020 Cs-137 k en L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Tab l ng Water Reac t ation Plan l e 2-8 (continu e S S# # M M M M S D S# # M M M M S D A# # M M M M S D S%M M o r e d) Non-I urve y Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

D ubsurface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

D Asphalt of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

D urface Scans

% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm)

I mpacted Ope n Surve y Unit 9,444 m 2 Hwy 35/Railro Way GroundsCo-60 3 0 0.079 0.075 0.095 0.068 0.014 Co-60 3 0 0.086 0.092 0.107 0.060 0.024 Co-60 None Taken 1% 8,124 9,200 2-48 n Land Surve y L4012108 1 ad Right of B ACs-137 3 2 0.119 0.108 0.156 0.093 0.033 Cs-137 3 2 0.189 0.091 0.409 0.067 0.191 Cs-137 Units - Char a Surve y Unit L 1 00 m 2 B ackground So i Area (inside L4 0Co-60 17 0 0.087 0.086 0.101 0.077 0.007 Co-60 None T aCo-60 None T a No Scanning P acterization Su r L4012109 ils Test 012108) Cs-137 17 17 0.160 0.161 0.268 0.059 0.059 Cs-137 aken Cs-137 aken Performe d r ve y Summar y y L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L a b L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012103-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-Genoa Coal P L3012105-CR-GS-002

-L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012105-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012106-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012107-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S L3012108-QJ-GS-001-S a Bold values b Survey unit s ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C S B 4.390 1 S S 3.570 0.Pile -SS 0.533 0.S B S S S B 14.600 0.S S 0.813 0.S B S S 1.420 0.S B 2.350 0.S S 6.490 0.indicate concentration g originally classified as t o r Table 2-9 C-14 Fe-55 N.230 3.430 1.671 2.790 1 .675 2.130 1 .713 2.300 2

.713 3.550 2 .719 3.610 2.705 1.920 3

.728 2.260 3 greater than MDC. Ital i Class 3 at time of sam p Non Imp a Ni-59 Co-60 N.470 0.026 2.870 0.027 3 0.018 .730 0.025 2 0.026 0.030 .370 0.037 3.560 0.037 3 0.019 .800 0.025 3.110 0.018 4.200 0.030 4icized values indicate M p le a cted Coal Pile Ni-63 Sr-90 N.140 0.321 0.380 0.391 0 0.950 0.289 0 0 0.950 0.348 0.580 0.338 0 0.940 0.293 0.440 0.278 0.710 0.271 0 MDC value 2-49 and Soil Sam p Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.018 0.820 0 0.022 0.628 0 0.022 0 0.016 0.587 0 0.020 0 0.020 0 0.030 0.611 0 0.028 0.616 0 0.013 0 0.019 0.593 0 0.016 0.604 0 0.020 0.576 0 ples - Test Am e s-137 Pm-147 E u 0.024 0.714 0 0.018 0.847 0 0.019 0 0.018 0.698 0 0.023 0 0.028 0.319 1.500 0.096 0.826 0 0.021 0.018 1.450 0.033 1.310 0.182 0.770 0 e rica Laborato r u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.071 0.190 0 0.060 0.167 0 0.052 0.152 0 0.051 0.137 0 0.049 0.166 0 0.072 0.199 0 0.115 0.223 0 0.079 0.232 0 0.045 0.115 0 0.049 0.156 0 0.041 0.128 0 0.059 0.176 0 ry Anal y sis (p C u-155 Np-237 P u 0.095 0.025 0 0.096 0.024 0 0.048 0.056 0.023 0 0.055 0.074 0.080 0.035 0 0.112 0.027 0 0.038 0.048 0.040 0 0.044 0.030 0 0.060 0.020 0 C i/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u 0.046 0.015 1 0.040 0.021 1 0.036 0.029 1 0.036 0.014 2 0.044 0.026 2 0.021 0.024 2 0.026 0.021 2 0.028 0.029 2 u-241 Am-241 A 1.730 0.032 0 1.650 0.025 0 0.041 1.670 0.018 0 0.048 0.061 2.550 0.019 0 2.740 0.025 0 0.034 2.580 0.020 0 2.670 0.017 0 2.740 0.015 0 A m-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.010 0.024 0.019 0.025 0.006 0.034 0.006 0.013 0.019 0.035 0.006 0.036 0.017 0.024 0.015 L L R S S##M M M M S S##M M M M S A##M M M M S S%M M a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S urve y Unit Surface Area Description S urface Soil

of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

S D Subsurface Soil

of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

S D Asphalt # of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

S D Surface Scans

% Scanne d Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) a MDC v a ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-10 Surve y Uni t 1,992 m 2 Reactor Bui lWGTV, Ven t Grounds Co-60 12 2 0.080 0.058 0.287 0.048 0.066 Co-60 18 0 0.078 0.052 0.516 0.047 0.109 None Taken No Scanning P a lue used for an a o r Impacted Cl a t L1010101 l ding, WTB, tilation Stack Cs-137 12 12 0.215 0.100 1.070 0.032 0.296 Cs-137 18 8 0.066 0.054 0.161 0.033 0.035 Performed a lytical results l ass 1 Open Lan d Surve y Unit 2,315 m 2 Turbine, Offic eGenerator Buil Grounds Co-60 2 0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.044 0.007 Co-60 22 0 0.058 0.058 0.080 0.043 0.010 None Taken No Scanning P l ess than MDC.

2-50 d Surve y Unit sL1010102 1 e, Diesel ding L M GCs-137 2 0 0.050 0.050 0.051 0.050 0.001 Cs-137 22 4 0.064 0.065 0.130 0.044 0.017 Nerformed N s - Characteri z Surve y Unit L 1 ,749 m 2 LSA Building, M aintenance E a G rounds Co-60 7 0 0.059 0.050 0.099 0.048 0.019 Co-60 25 0 0.046 0.046 0.055 0.025 0.005 N one Taken N o Scanning P e z ation Surve y S L1010103 2 a t Shack NCs-137 7 1 0.069 0.054 0.161 0.048 0.041 Cs-137 25 0 0.049 0.049 0.054 0.042 0.003 erformed S ummar y Surve y Unit L 2 ,387 m 2 N orth LSE Gro uCo-60 1 0 0.045 0.045 0.045 0.045 N/A Co-60 14 0 0.048 0.048 0.050 0.043 0.002 Co-60 10 0 0.053 0.054 0.062 0.042 0.006 No Scanning P e L1010104 u nds Cs-137 1 0 0.049 0.049 0.049 0.049 N/A Cs-137 14 3 0.041 0.042 0.051 0.027 0.009 Cs-137 10 1 0.051 0.053 0.057 0.037 0.006 erforme d L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L1010101-CJ-GS-002-S L1010101-CJ-GS-009-S L1010101-CJ-GS-010-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-001-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010101-QJ-GS-002-S L1010102-CJ-FC-001-C L1010102-CJ-GS-013-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-001-S L1010102-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-CJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-SL-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-001-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-002-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010103-QJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CJ-GS-003-S L1010104-CR-PA-007

-L1010104-QQ-PA-001

-L1010104-QR-GS-001

-a Bold values ng Water Reac t ation Plan TH-3 C SS SS SS S B 0.364 0 S S 0.441 0.S B 0.377 0.S S 1.380 0.C V 1.710 0.S B S B 8.740 0.S S S B 24.700 0.SB S M 0.354 0 S B 3.260 0.S S S B 0.649 0.S S S B 0.654 0.SS SB -AV -AV -SB indicate concentration g t o r Table 2-11 C C-14 Fe-55 N .896 2.430 1.676 2.190 1

.679 2.150 1

.67 7 4.190 2.72 7 1.650 2 .726 2.120 2 .715 2.230 2 .453 0.689 0.715 1.830 2 .702 2.100 2 .71 7 2.340 2 greater than MDC. Ital i lass 1 Concret e Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.024 0.040 0.286 .850 0.024 3.900 0.018 3.750 0.017 2.010 0.015 3.630 0.106 3 0.030 .620 0.015 4 0.022 .760 0.021 3 0.011 0.711 0.136 1.850 0.017 4 0.025 .620 0.014 3 0.019 .630 0.012 3 0.023 0.015 0.021 0.025 0.017 icized values indicate M e , Asphalt, Se d Ni-63 Sr-90 N 0 0 0.040 0.335 0.040 0.440 0.930 0.338 0.320 0.357 0.920 0.292 0 0.000 0.310 0 0.920 0.316 0 0.090 0.132 0.240 0.333 0 0.710 0.325 0 0.660 0.300 0 0 0 0 0 0 MDC value. 2-51 d iment and Soi l Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.020 0 0.020 0 0.025 0 0.015 0.579 0 0.012 0.587 0 0.011 0.620 0 0.010 0.521 0 0.022 0.536 0 0.016 0 0.011 0.539 0 0.015 0 0.014 0.537 0 0.01 7 0 0.018 0.432 0 0.011 0.606 0 0.015 0 0.012 0.645 0 0.01 7 0 0.009 0.557 0 0.019 0 0.008 0 0.014 0 0.025 0 0.011 0 l Samples - Te s s-137 Pm-147 E u.233 0.185 0.413 0 0.020 0.800 0.147 3.170 0.149 0.772 0.059 0.978 0.352 1.290 0 0.021 0 0.012 0.961 0 0.018 0 0.016 0.722 0 0.021 0.136 0.360 0 0.015 0.740 0 0.020 0 0.012 0.838 0 0.01 7 0 0.011 0.713 0.091 0 0.013 0 0.016 0 0.028 0 0.012 0 s t America La b u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.056 0.161 0 0.056 0.181 0 0.062 0.247 0 0.050 0.143 0 0.034 0.112 0 0.040 0.109 0 0.033 0.096 0 0.061 0.239 0 0.044 0.170 0 0.030 0.101 0 0.036 0.113 0 0.043 0.139 0 0.044 0.181 0 0.054 0.199 0 0.036 0.117 0 0.046 0.174 0 0.029 0.103 0 0.040 0.139 0 0.029 0.092 0 0.05 7 0.186 0 0.032 0.078 0 0.042 0.141 0 0.058 0.218 0 0.038 0.132 0 b orator y Anal y u-155 Np-237 P u 0.066 0.050 0.05 7 0.044 0.019 0 0.044 0.006 0 0.040 0.019 0 0.036 0.016 0 0.062 0.029 0 0.041 0.028 0.028 0 0.042 0.042 0.032 0 0.046 0.049 0.018 0 0.039 0.026 0 0.04 7 0.034 0.020 0 0.045 0.034 0.040 0 0.063 0.036 0.044 0.061 0.032 y sis (pCi/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u 0.046 0.023 1 0.039 0.023 1 0.041 0.022 1 0.040 0.016 2 0.041 0.028 2 0.040 0.026 2 0.042 0.029 2 0.015 0.015 0 0.029 0.017 1 0.034 0.024 2 0.028 0.028 2 u-241 Am-241 A 0.058 0.042 0.051 1.970 0.015 0 1.830 0.016 0 1.950 0.017 0 2.090 0.020 0 2.490 0.018 0 0.036 2.780 0.015 0 0.039 2.660 0.015 0 0.044 0.86 7 0.008 0 1.430 0.009 0 0.043 2.570 0.018 0 0.024 2.470 0.018 0 0.052 0.034 0.040 0.050 0.032 A m-243 Cm-243/244 0.023 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.014 0.01 7 0.022 0.019 0.021 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.019 0.008 0.024 0.005 0.024 0.014 0.022 0.005 La Cros s License T Revisio n Tab l Su r Su r# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD Su b# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD As p# o f# >C Me a Me d Ma x Mi n SD Su r% S Me a Ma x

s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 le 2-12 I m r ve y Unit Surface Area Description r face Soil f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) bsurface Soil f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) phalt f Samples C L an (pCi/g) dian (pCi/g) x (pCi/g) n (pCi/g) rface Scans Scanne d an Scan (cpm) x Scan (cpm)

W ater Reacto r Plan mpacted Cl a Su r 7,211 m 2 LACBW RBuilding, House, WCo-6 013 0 0.07 30.07 70.10 60.05 30.01 6Co-6 016 1 0.05 20.04 60.11 20.04 00.01 8Co-6 0 6 0 0.0510.0510.05 40.04 70.00 2 50% 7,500 to 8, 011,500 to 1 2 r ass 2 Open L S r ve y Unit L20 1 R Ad m LACB W W arehouse G r 0 3 7 6 3 6 0 2 6 2 0 8 0 4 7 2 00 2,000 2-52 L and Surv e S ummar y 11101 ministration W R Crib r ounds Cs-137 13 8 0.090 0.100 0.139 0.041 0.030 Cs-137 16 2 0.049 0.048 0.088 0.034 0.012 Cs-137 6 0 0.051 0.051 0.054 0.047 0.003 ey Units - C Su r 6,785 m 2 G-3 Cri b Circ. W a Area Sou tCo-6 010 0 0.06 40.06 40.0810.05 20.00 9Co-6 0 7 0 0.04 90.04 80.05 50.04 20.00 4Co-6 0 6 0 0.05 60.05 70.05 90.04 90.00 3 1 C haracteriz a r ve y Unit L20 1 b House, a ter Disch a t h of LSE F e 0 4 4 2 9 0 9 8 5 2 4 0 6 7 9 9 3 50% 7,500 to 8,00 0 11,500 to 12,0 0 a tion Surv e 11102 LACBWR arge Line, ence Cs-137 10 6 0.065 0.054 0.200 0.030 0.049 Cs-137 7 2 0.038 0.033 0.052 0.029 0.009 Cs-137 6 3 0.048 0.051 0.055 0.009 0.008 0 0 0 ey L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L2011101-CJ-GS-001-S L2011101-CR-PA-003

-L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QJ-GS-001-S L2011101-QQ-GS-001

-L2011101-QQ-GS-001

-L2011101-QQ-GS-002

-L2011101-QQ-PA-001

-L2011102-QQ-GS-001

-L2011102-QQ-GS-002

-L2011102-QQ-PA-001

-a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C S M -AV S B 0.518 0.S M 2.040 0.S S -SB -SS 11.810 0.-SB 2.500 0.-AV -SB 1.370 1-SS 0.533 0.-SB 0.525 0.-AV l ues indicate co n t o r Table 2 C-14 Fe-55 N .72 7 2.290 2.70 7 2.240 2 .726 2.590 2

.731 1.940 2 .560 2.260 3.713 2.330 2

.702 3.890 2 ncentration gre a 2-13 Class 2 Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.096 0.023 .660 0.016 4.950 0.049 4 0.012 0.017 .600 0.035 3.680 0.017 3 0.022 .040 0.007 4.820 0.019 4.880 0.031 3 0.027 ater than MDC.

Asphalt, Sedi m Ni-63 Sr-90 N 0 0.030 0.273 0.140 0.523 0 0 0.720 0.255 0.870 0.314 0 0.390 0.291 0.300 0.361 0.950 0.327 0 0 Italicized valu e 2-53 m ent and Soil S Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.011 0 0.016 0 0.014 0.643 0 0.018 0.585 0 0.020 0 0.012 0 0.035 0.532 0 0.014 0.616 0 0.015 0 0.018 0.537 0 0.014 0.595 0 0.016 0.568 0 0.01 7 0 es indicate MD C S amples - Test s-137 Pm-147 E u.137 0 0.01 7 0 0.015 0.705 0.107 0.615 0.080 0 0.013 0.103 0.779 0 0.016 0.697 0 0.015 0 0.021 0.672 0 0.014 0.772 0 0.018 0.717 0 0.018 0 C value. America Lab o u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.041 0.098 0 0.039 0.131 0 0.033 0.108 0 0.048 0.178 0 0.060 0.188 0 0.040 0.127 0 0.09 7 0.205 0 0.03 7 0.119 0 0.046 0.135 0 0.044 0.173 0 0.039 0.111 0 0.052 0.183 0 0.051 0.142 0 o rator y Anal y s i u-155 Np-237 P u 0.033 0.039 0.040 0.022 0 0.049 0.026 0 0.091 0.03 7 0.102 0.023 0 0.041 0.019 0 0.042 0.055 0.031 0 0.045 0.017 0 0.051 0.022 0 0.038 i s u-238 Pu-239/240 P u 0.028 0.025 2 0.045 0.021 3 0.03 7 0.024 2 0.039 0.016 2 0.026 0.018 2 0.036 0.026 2 0.028 0.020 1 u-241 Am-241 A 0.031 0.038 2.470 0.015 0 3.100 0.037 0 0.042 0.031 2.800 0.019 0 2.920 0.020 0 0.040 2.680 0.029 0 2.880 0.026 0 1.710 0.010 0 0.036 A m-243 Cm-243/244 0.022 0.019 0.036 0.034 0.015 0.015 0.028 0.016 0.028 0.024 0.034 0.021 0.028 0.006

L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 S S# # M M M M S S# # M M M M S C# # M M M M S S M M ng Water Reac t ation Plan Table 2-14 urve y Unit Surface Area Description urface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

D ubsurface Soil of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

D Concrete/Asphalt of Samples

>CL Mean (pCi/g)

M edian (pCi/g)

Max (pCi/g)

M in (pCi/g)

D urface Scans % Scanned Mean Scan (cpm)

Max Scan (cpm) o r Impacted Cl a Surve y Uni t24,042 m 2 North End of Li cCo-60 3 0 0.070 0.076 0.077 0.058 0.011 Co-60 3 0 0.051 0.053 0.054 0.046 0.004 Co-60 3 0 0.031 0.031 0.035 0.028 0.003 1%9,000 10,000 ass 3 Open Lan d t L3012101 c ensed Site Cs-137 3 0 0.073 0.072 0.083 0.065 0.009 Cs-137 3 0 0.051 0.052 0.052 0.051 0.001 Cs-137 3 0 0.029 0.027 0.033 0.026 0.004 % 2-54 d Surve y Unit s Surve y Unit 11,711 m 2 Transmission SwiCo-60 None TCo-60 None TCo-60 None Taken No Scanning s - Characteri zL3012102 3 tchyard Area P GCs-137 Taken Cs-137 Taken Cs-137 Performe d z ation Surve y S Surve y Unit L 31,012 m 2 Plant Access, ISF Grounds Co-60 5 0 0.063 0.064 0.078 0.053 0.010 Co-60 4 0 0.072 0.072 0.100 0.046 0.023 Co-60 7 0 0.062 0.055 0.080 0.047 0.013 1%5,89 06,40 0 S ummar y L3012109 SI Haul Road Cs-137 5 5 0.152 0.143 0.267 0.075 0.078 Cs-137 4 0 0.066 0.059 0.101 0.045 0.025 Cs-137 7 0 0.059 0.052 0.079 0.028 0.019 0 0 L L R R L L L L L L L L L L L a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Radionuclide L3012101-CR-GC-001

-L3012101-CR-GC-002

-L3012101-CR-GC-003

-L3012101-CR-GS-003

-L3012101-QQ-GS-001

-L3012101-QQ-SL-001

-L3012104-CR-GS-002

-L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S L3012104-QJ-GS-001-S a Bold values ng Water Reac t ation Plan H-3 C-CV -CV -CV 0.-SS -SB 18.400 0.-SS 15.500 0.-SM 0.364 0.-SM S B 2.160 0.S M 2.890 0.S S 2.190 0.indicate concentration g t o r Table 2-15 C-14 Fe-55 N .669 2.180 2

.71 7 2.390 2.708 2.330 2.342 2.710 0 .670 1.950 1.672 2.720 1.676 4.240 1 greater than MDC. Ital i 5 Class 3 As p Ni-59 Co-60 N 0.028 0.035 .020 0.031 3 0.025 .870 0.016 5.660 0.020 3 0.739 0.022 1 0.015 .750 0.021 3.990 0.037 3.880 0.029 3icized values indicate M p halt, Sedimen t Ni-63 Sr-90 N 0 0.590 0.374 0 0.640 0.309 0.890 0.295 0.090 0.152 0 0.060 0.325 0.500 0.298 0.300 0.329 0 MDC value 2-55 t and Soil Sam p Nb-94 Tc-99 C s 0.030 0 0.026 0 0.02 7 0.521 0 0.01 7 0 0.014 0.550 0 0.01 7 0.603 0 0.01 7 0.360 0 0.013 0 0.018 0.469 0 0.020 0.651 0 0.020 0.631 0 p les - Test A m s-137 Pm-147 E u 0.026 0 0.033 0 0.02 7 1.480 0.113 0 0.015 0.899 0.059 1.090 0 0.020 0.333 0.066 0 0.025 0.818 0.094 0.818 0.138 0.667 0 m erica Laborat o u-152 Eu-154 E u 0.043 0.221 0 0.062 0.271 0 0.056 0.249 0 0.052 0.157 0 0.036 0.128 0 0.04 7 0.116 0 0.042 0.153 0 0.035 0.128 0 0.053 0.160 0 0.074 0.217 0 0.068 0.181 0 o r y Anal y sis (p u-155 Np-237 P u 0.059 0.056 0.069 0.025 0 0.059 0.036 0.039 0 0.054 0.028 0 0.034 0.009 0 0.04 7 0.054 0.022 0 0.071 0.006 0 0.080 0.020 0 p Ci/g) u-238 Pu-239/240 P u 0.046 0.018 1 0.035 0.022 2 0.028 0.022 2 0.016 0.013 0 0.02 7 0.021 1 0.031 0.017 1 0.043 0.026 1 u-241 Am-241 A 0.053 0.055 1.690 0.019 0 0.052 2.590 0.023 0 2.640 0.019 0 0.79 7 0.009 0 0.036 1.610 0.016 0 1.560 0.016 0 1.580 0.019 0 A m-243 Cm-243/244 0.021 0.006 0.029 0.027 0.021 0.006 0.009 0.011 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.019 0.021 La Cros s License T Revisio n H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244

H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 T B1001101-CResult (pCi/g) 3.950 -0.162 9.130 0.000 11.500 39.300 6.910 -0.120 0.024 7500 2.580 0.266 0.369 0.009 0.176 0.132 0.902 0.407 0.028 0.0579 B1001101-CResult (pCi/g) 7.240 -0.492 9.450 0.000 57.700 202.000 34.500 0.191 -0.189 614.000 0.768 0.335 -0.429 0.000 0.528 0.491 7.470 1.450 0.052 0.0879 W ater Reacto r Plan T able 2-16 C J-FC-001-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.590 11.400 016.000 70.254 00.377 10.402 40.043 00.312 00.566 07.090 789.020 52.410 04.440 10.042 00.056 00.048 02.700 10.048 00.046 00.0302 0. C J-FC-003-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.360 11.460 09.040 40.365 00.333 50.593 2 10.040 30.392 00.586 00.732 6 42.870 15.460 01.510 00.041 00.058 00.030 02.640 20.047 00.027 00.0408 0. r Concrete 0-1/2 B R p Ci/g) (p.350 9.793 -0.880 1 0.325 0.250 0.110 3.680 0.189 0.330 01.000 9.230 -0.398 0.140 0.021 -0.065 -0.055 -0.660 -1.107 0.030 00371 -0 0-1/2 B R p Ci/g) (p.580 1 2.806 -0.950 6.806 0.880 0 1.100 2.330 0.203 -0.330 -0 4.000 2.300 0.536 0.914 -0.016 -0.111 -0.104 -0.160 -1.250 0.033 00496 0.2-56 Core Isoto p B 1001101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/9.720 1.5 6 0.346 1.4 4 0.400 21.3 0.000 0.2 6 0.082 0.1 6 3.850 0.4 2 0.162 0.0 5 0.001 0.1 3 0.076 0.5 2 9.660 0.1 5 0.039 0.5 1 0.025 1.2 6 0.071 0.3 7 0.002 0.0 4 0.017 0.0 6 0.006 0.0 4 1.510 2.5 0 0.011 0.0 3 0.014 0.0 3.0081 0.0 4 B 1001101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/2.600 1.5 7 0.566 1.3 9 6.160 14.3 0.000 0.2 5 0.435 0.0 5 2.990 0.4 0 0.304 0.0 5 0.001 0.1 5 0.129 0.5 9 2.450 0.1 1 0.045 0.3 4 0.179 1.0 2 0.007 0.2 8 0.010 0.0 5 0.005 0.0 6 0.004 0.0 4 1.320 2.6 6 0.018 0.0 3 0.009 0.0 3.0000 0.01 p ic Anal y si s C-001-CV 1/2-1 D C /g) (pCi/g)60 1.950 40 0.806 300 10.20 0 64 0.151 68 0.078 25 0.474 51 0.041 39 0.078 26 0.310 52 1.100 11 0.055 60 0.171 76 0.118 45 0.017 66 0.026 49 0.018 00 1.360 37 0.020 30 0.019 478 0.009 4 C-003-CV 1/2-1 D C /g) (pCi/g)70 2.240 90 0.765 300 6.960 57 0.157 57 0.096 00 0.392 51 0.052 53 0.086 96 0.339 13 0.348 46 0.154 20 0.383 82 0.164 51 0.018 64 0.029 47 0.017 60 1.480 38 0.024 30 0.01668 0.004 7 s Results B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 3.640 -0.27 0 0 11.30 0 0.000 0.800 4.860 11.60 0 -0.01 7 -0.10 4 450.00 0.173 -0.00 8 0.145 -0.01 0 0.575 0.715 13.20 0 0.550 -0.03 6 4 0.154 0 B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 4.490 -0.55 5 7.600 0.000 28.10 0 88.30 0 11.00 0 -0.01 6 0.153 213.00 0.162 0.557 0.108 -0.02 0 0.413 0.336 -7.72 0 0.614 0.052 7 -0.054 7 101-CJ-FC-002 t MDC (pCi/g) 1.620 0 1.410 0 9.950 0.289 0.117 0.492 0 0.046 7 0.165 4 0.564 0 0.597 2.150 8 1.460 0.837 0 0.042 0.617 0.466 0 23.500 0.401 6 0.433 0 0.4670 101-CJ-FC-004 t MDC (pCi/g) 1.590 5 1.450 7.070 0.276 0 0.190 0 0.467 0 0.045 6 0.264 0.592 0 0.439 1.570 3.070 0.850 0 0.060 0.426 0.325 0 26.000 0.441 0.292 7 0.4320 -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.330 0.794 5.540 0.183 0.172 0.581 1.130 0.095 0.322 46.900 0.924 0.820 0.503 0.009 0.436 0.413 15.100 0.419 0.140 0.2600 -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.420 0.795 4.040 0.467 2.950 9.200 1.070 0.155 0.352 22.200 0.611 0.863 0.138 0.020 0.320 0.265 14.400 0.436 0.136 0.0776 La Cros s License T Revisio n H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244

H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240 Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 2.960 -0.077 8.070 2.590 73.900 221.000 32.800 -0.089 0.178 65.700 0.395 0.637 0.011 0.005 0.706 0.489 9.090 1.590 0.048 0.1160 B1001101-C Result (pCi/g) 3.590 -0.246 6.030 0.000 -0.026 2.310 0.146 0.019 0.024 1.410 0.021 0.055 0.003 0.003 -0.004 0.035 -1.890 0.006 -0.002 -0.0036 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u C J-FC-005-CV 0MDC (pCi/g) (p1.520 11.410 09.770 50.267 00.372 70.427 2 30.043 30.531 00.562 00.569 61.240 05.650 00.699 00.015 00.065 00.035 02.540 20.045 00.031 00.0443 0. C J-WC-006-CV MDC (pCi/g) (p1.640 11.490 014.500 70.257 00.207 00.396 00.038 00.141 00.556 00.153 00.434 01.270 00.336 00.045 00.043 00.033 02.360 10.036 00.031 00.0287 0. r u ed) C o 0-1/2 B R pCi/g) (p.200 4.810 -0.230 8.813 0.510 0 3.000 4.170 0.317 -0.336 -0.970 0.746 0.831 0.414 0.010 -0.134 -0.106 -0.270 0.273 0.034 -00590 0 1/2-1 R pCi/g) (p.350 0.836 0.050 1.147 0.240 0.335 2.034 0.060 0.324 -0.258 1 6.113 0.137 0.196 0.021 0.016 0.028 -0.270 -1.017 0.005 -00052 0 2-57 o ncrete Co r B 1001101-CJ-F C Result M D pCi/g) (pCi/4.180 1.8 5 0.701 1.3 5 8.170 9.8 7 0.000 0.2 7 0.075 0.1 7 4.870 0.4 3 0.423 0.0 5 0.015 0.1 2 0.124 0.5 4 0.801 0.1 1 0.001 0.3 7 0.119 0.9 2 0.013 0.2 5 0.017 0.0 5 0.003 0.0 5 0.008 0.0 3 0.337 2.5 3 0.012 0.0 1 0.002 0.0 5.0000 0.01 B1008101-CJ

-Result M D pCi/g) (pCi/0.382 0.9 4 0.053 1.3 7 1.610 6.5 5 0.000 0.2 3 0.662 0.0 6 2.730 0.3 5 0.154 0.0 5 0.000 0.2 1 0.010 0.5 7 6.000 0.1 7 0.034 0.6 3 0.060 1.2 0 0.140 0.3 5 0.003 0.0 4 0.018 0.0 6 0.011 0.0 5 1.120 2.7 1 0.020 0.0 4 0.002 0.0 4.0062 0.01 r e Isotopic A C-005-CV 1/2-1 D C i/g) (pCi/g)50 1.520 50 0.733 70 5.340 70 0.165 71 0.080 30 0.570 51 0.063 28 0.074 40 0.307 17 0.172 73 0.005 23 0.245 55 0.148 54 0.016 53 0.023 38 0.008 30 1.510 18 0.017 54 0.02276 0.0049 -FC-002-CV D C i/g) (pCi/g)40 0.559 70 0.794 50 3.370 34 0.151 65 0.131 53 0.355 53 0.041 11 0.066 79 0.335 77 1.780 33 0.056 00 0.239 57 0.215 48 0.022 60 0.033 54 0.019 10 1.480 42 0.027 44 0.01787 0.0125 A nal y sis Re B1001 Resul t (pCi/g) 4.210 0.077 11.70 0 0.000 2.040 13.40 0 7.150 0.026 0.083 1490 0.031 0.128 0.737 -0.013 0.029 0.035 -1.380 0.048 0.003 -0.005 3 B1 0 Resul t (pCi/g) 1.300 -0.296 6.460 0.000 0.974 4.400 0.235 0.016 -0.005 10.00 0 0.291 0.019 0.101 -0.024 0.042 0.008 -0.194 0.019 -0.001 -0.005 6 e sults 101-CJ-WC-00 6 t MDC ) (pCi/g) 1.700 1.440 0 9.320 0.263 0.047 0 0.420 0.034 0.154 0.580 0.721 3.660 1.190 1.470 0.044 0.037 0.025 2.650 0.052 0.029 3 0.0419 0 08101-CJ-FC-0 t MDC ) (pCi/g) 1.020 1.440 14.500 0.241 0.142 0.356 0.035 0.141 0.592 0 0.154 0.470 1.410 0.348 0.068 0.057 0.034 2.550 0.051 0.052 6 0.0444 6-CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 1.440 0.832 5.530 0.230 0.264 1.430 0.703 0.090 0.341 155.000 2.210 0.679 0.896 0.010 0.027 0.026 1.470 0.041 0.011 0.0075 0 03-CV (pCi/g) 0.713 0.810 7.050 0.171 0.162 0.510 0.041 0.081 0.343 1.130 0.270 0.052 0.208 0.025 0.038 0.017 1.470 0.029 0.023 0.0080 La Cros s License T Revisio n H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244

H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244 s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B10081 0Result (pCi/g) 1.200 0.077 6.520 0.000 1.390 4.260 0.216 0.001 0.043 19.800 -0.119 -0.061 0.006 0.014 0.020 0.025 -1.610 0.052 -0.004 0.0100 B1002101-CResult (pCi/g) 0.763 -0.776 3.540 0.000 0.742 3.360 2.410 0.035 0.259 3.630 0.156 0.119 0.159 0.000 0.023 0.000 -0.052 0.020 0.013 0.0048 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u 0 1-CJ-FC-004-CMDC (pCi/g) (p0.990 01.430 011.500 50.229 00.095 00.339 00.040 00.143 00.599 00.166 20.580 01.370 00.376 00.065 00.052 00.042 02.610 10.034 00.032 00.0150 0. C J-FC-001-CV MDC (pCi/g) (p1.000 01.410 05.670 30.228 00.069 00.333 00.050 00.149 00.564 00.150 00.420 01.400 00.335 00.045 00.061 00.049 02.820 10.015 00.029 00.0143 0. r u ed) C o C V B R p Ci/g) (p.685 0.829 0.820 1 5.162 6 5.255 9 5.492 81.041 9 9.081 0.350 0.150 4.344 0.296 1.220 0.035 -0.030 0.028 1.430 5.035 3.006 00142 0. 1-1.5 B R p Ci/g) (p.638 0.763 0.150 7.159 0.148 0.407 5.250 0.066 -0.342 0.493 2.236 0.382 0.204 0.018 -0.035 0.021 0.640 -2.020 0.018 00096 0.2-58 o ncrete Co r B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.820 0.9 8 0.505 1.4 1 5.400 13.8 5.500 0.3 1 5.000 0.4 27.000 0.4 7 9.800 0.0 4 0.098 0.4 7 0.113 0.5 6 4710 1.6 9 0.815 5.9 4.250 5.4 6 0.073 2.1 2 0.012 0.0 6 0.920 0.6 2.280 0.4 6 5.240 26.7 3.200 0.4 2 0.406 0.2 9.2020 0.4 2 B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.094 0.9 1 0.372 1.3 8 7.770 25.0 0.000 0.2 5 0.872 0.1 3 5.730 0.3 8 0.106 0.0 4 0.034 0.1 4 0.032 0.5 2 2.440 0.1 4 0.125 0.3 8 0.271 0.9 5 0.099 0.3 2 0.007 0.0 5 0.004 0.0 6 0.009 0.0 4 2.090 2.7 0 0.017 0.0 4 0.029 0.0 2.0059 0.03 r e Isotopic A C-001-CV 0-1/2 D C /g) (pCi/g)85 0.637 10 0.850 800 7.430 10 8.690 20 9.600 72 85.00 0 45 9.600 75 0.149 64 0.333 90 491.00 0 40 1.410 60 1.980 20 1.280 60 0.023 20 0.511 69 0.537 700 16.20 0 28 0.989 96 0.310 200 0.267 0 C-001-CV 1.5-2 D C /g) (pCi/g)17 0.512 80 0.819 000 11.40 0 59 0.188 38 0.161 88 0.646 41 0.032 42 0.083 28 0.308 46 0.343 83 0.195 56 0.406 26 0.196 52 0.019 61 0.030 41 0.021 00 1.460 41 0.025 29 0.026 331 0.015 4 A nal y sis Re B100 2 Resul t (pCi/g) 0.275 -0.01 8 0.547 0.000 1.010 0 5.640 0.253 0.029 -0.10 1 0 3.870 0.039 -0.26 0 0.077 -0.02 2 0.017 -0.00 5 0 -0.98 4 0.035 -0.01 8 0 -0.004 6 B100 2 Resul t (pCi/g) 1.710 15.40 0 0 8.960 423.00 300.00 2360 220.00 -0.35 0 0.792 2540 0 0.510 4.650 1.060 0.024 3.200 2.580 36.90 0 9.080 0.305 4 0.428 0 e sults 2 101-CJ-FC-001 t MDC (pCi/g) 0.931 8 1.440 5.510 0.245 0.149 0.367 0.053 0.102 1 0.507 0.137 0.444 0 1.480 0.272 2 0.064 0.059 5 0.042 4 2.680 0.037 8 0.054 6 0.0366 2 101-CJ-FC-002 t MDC (pCi/g) 1.180 0 1.510 5.860 0 0.446 0 0.762 0.661 0 0.052 0 0.935 0.562 0 4.140 13.700 7.170 7.370 0.042 0.497 0.287 0 24.000 0.682 0.388 0 0.5450 -CV 1/2-1 (pCi/g) 0.543 0.824 2.840 0.170 0.168 0.633 0.049 0.054 0.289 0.496 0.107 0.859 0.162 0.023 0.033 0.013 1.510 0.031 0.013 0.0066 -CV 0-1/2 (pCi/g) 0.846 2.310 3.640 55.200 30.200 245.000 21.100 0.567 0.373 2650 0.956 4.390 0.988 0.027 0.825 0.713 17.100 2.030 0.286 0.4200 La Cros s License T Revisio n H-3 C-14 Fe-55 Ni-59 Co-60 Ni-63 Sr-90 Nb-94 Tc-99 Cs-137 Eu-152 Eu-154 Eu-155 Np-237 Pu-238 Pu-239/240

Pu-241 Am-241 Am-243 Cm-243/244

s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Table 2-B1002101-CResult (pCi/g) 0.846 6.180 5.270 0.000 8.270 175.000 3.520 -0.041 0.165 208.000 -0.280 0.255 0.116 -0.019 0.059 0.056 -0.965 0.238 0.005 0.0018 W ater Reacto r Plan -16 (contin u C J-FC-002-CV 1MDC (pCi/g) (p1.120 01.420 125.300 1 10.269 00.114 00.442 1 80.047 00.230 00.522 00.362 2 11.580 01.900 00.864 00.056 00.064 00.049 02.970 10.048 00.060 00.0438 0. r u ed) C o 1/2-1 B R p Ci/g) (p.716 0.340 -0 1.400 8.616 0.907 8 8.300 7 0.356 7.135 0.312 0 1.700 1.950 0.259 0.205 -0.017 -0.046 0.040 0.690 1.080 0.028 -00179 0. 2-59 o ncrete Co r B 1002101-CJ-F C R esul t M D p Ci/g) (pCi/0.836 0.9 6 0.405 1.4 4 8.430 17.0 0.000 0.3 3 8.570 0.1 4 0.600 0.5 4 7.000 0.0 5 0.038 0.2 1 0.062 0.5 4 1240 0.8 1 0.176 2.6 0 0.090 2.3 2 0.004 1.7 1 0.011 0.0 4 0.105 0.0 5 0.126 0.0 3.500 2.5 6 0.339 0.0 4 0.001 0.0 3.0175 0.01 r e Isotopic A C-003-CV 0-1/2 D C /g) (pCi/g)62 0.624 40 0.803 000 8.210 34 0.484 48 0.940 48 7.370 50 0.691 11 0.060 43 0.318 17 129.00 0 00 0.514 20 0.202 10 1.030 44 0.009 56 0.051 39 0.051 60 1.640 44 0.099 37 0.01275 0.0203 A nal y sis Re 0 3 e sults

La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Ta b W ater Reacto r Plan ble 2-17 19 8 W e Radio n Mn-Co-Co-Nb-Cs-1 Ce-1 r 8 3 Ground w e ll-Point S o n uclide 57 95 1 37 1 41 2-60 w ater Anal y o uth of Tur b A (p y sis from T e b ine Buildi n A ctivit y pCi/L) 63.4 6.4 508 21.4 21.7 18.9 e mporar y ng L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 Ju n H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a B No v H-3 Co-6 Sr-9 Cs-1 a B ng Water Reac t ation Plan e 2013 MW-2 0 (pCi/L 57 2 6 0 4.0 0 9 0 2.0 5 137 3.9 7 B old values ind i v ember 2013 MW-2 0 (pCi/L 23 5 6 0 4.6 4 9 0 1.1 8 137 4.6 4 B old values ind i o r Table 2 01-A MW-201-B L) (pCi/L)2 506 0 5.01 5 2.00 7 3.84 icate concentrat i 01-A MW-201-B L) (pCi/L)5 150 4 3.80 8 3.73 4 1.90 icate concentrat i 2-18 2013 G r B MW-202-A (pCi/L) 660 4.76 1.82 4.05 i on greater tha n B MW-202-A (pCi/L) 257 5.26 1.18 6.54 i on greater tha n 2-61 roundwater MMW-202-B M W (pCi/L) (p484 4.51 1.43 3.91 n MDC. Italiciz eMW-202-B M W (pCi/L) (p278 5.41 1.61 4.70 n MDC. Italiciz e onitorin g Res u W-203-A MW-2 p Ci/L) (pC iN/A 424.95 4.12.06 2.04.52 4.3 e d values indic a W-203-A MW-2 p Ci/L) (pC i449 234.43 3.81.87 2.44.41 3.9 e d values indic a ults 203-B MW-204-i/L) (pCi/L)20 397 12 4.36 06 2.18 31 4.11 a te MDC value.

203-B MW-204-i/L) (pCi/L)35 193 89 4.52 40 1.18 98 4.77 a te MDC value.

-A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 420 4.26 2.08 3.96 -A MW-204-B (pCi/L) 171 8.24 1.51 7.92 L L R J G A G B H C F N C N S N T C E E E P P 2 P A a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 J UNE 2014 MW- DW3 G ross A lpha 1.26E-0 1 G ross Beta 1.48E+0 H-3 1.05E+0 C-14 2.79E+0 F e-55 -2.00E+0 N i-59 1.83E+0 C o-60 1.02E+0 N i-63 -1.78E+0 Sr-90 6.09E-0 1 N b-94 4.40E-0 1 Tc-99 -8.28E+0 C s-137 -5.97E-0 E u-152 9.48E+0 0 E u-154 -5.24E+0 E u-155 -2.67E+0 P u-238 2.83E-0 2 P u-2 39/240 -9.61E-0 2 P u-241 3.51E+0 Am-241 5.39E-0 2 a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan MW- DW4 M D 1 -1.33E-01 4.4 4 0 3.13E+00 1.9 3 2 1.59E+02 1.9 40 0.00E+00 -3.

9 01 -3.12E+01 -2.

61 3.96E+01 -4.

70 3.94E-01 2.5 00 -6.14E+00 -7.

4 1 8.99E-02 8.

9 1 1.43E-01 -1.

2 00 -7.37E+00 -8.

21 -3.47E-01 -7.

4 0 2.34E+00 -7.

4 00 3.16E+00 1.3 5 00 1.46E+00 -1.

5 2 -4.77E-02 -2.

2 2 3.36E-02 3.

10 2.70E+00 -8.

3 2 3.42E-02 4.

6 l ues indicate co n t o r M W- D W5 MW- DW7 4E+00 -3.78E-01 3E+00 0.00E+00 4E+02 1.23E+02 97E+00 -5.08E+00 66E+01 -3.86E+01 75E+01 2.60E+01 0E+00 -2.42E+00 40E+00 -4.38E+00 9 9 E-02 1.78E-02 26E+00 7.49E-01 26E+00 -9.36E+00 4 5 E-01 -1.83E+00 43E+00 -5.51E+00 5E+00 -4.73E+00 5 4 E-01 -1.07E+02 2 2 E-02 8.22E-02 1 3 E-02 4.07E-01 39E+00 2.62E+00 6 5 E-03 -1.01E-02 ncentration gre a Tab l MW-B11R M W B11 A0.00E+00 7.33 E3.59E+00 -2.70 E2.45E+02 1.61E+9.06E+00 6.83E

+-3.19E+01 -3.75 E-4.16E+00 2.53E

+8.76E-01 -1.94 E-3.57E+00 0.00E

+7.34E-01 6.11 E-6.99E-01 1.53E

+-5.52E+00 -8.46 E1.24E+00 1.84E

+-9.93E-01 1.48E

+1.63E+00 -2.61 E1.60E+00 -4.47 E0.00E+00 4.09 E-2.54E-02 -3.39 E-5.72E+00 8.38 E1.22E-02 8.37 E ater than MDC.

le 2-19 2014 W-A R MW- B2 2.13E+00 6 E-01 1.12E+01 4+02 1.60E+02 1+00 1.94E+00 -

2 E+01 -9.20E+00 -

4+00 -7.13E+00 3 E+00 -1.39E+00 -

1+00 -7.94E+00 1 E-01 6.52E-01 6+00 1.77E+00 6 E+00 -7.41E+00 -

8+00 1.37E+00 2+00 1.07E-01 1 E+00 2.36E+00 1 E+00 1.60E+00 -

3 E-02 5.40E-02 8 E-02 3.40E-02 1 E-01 0.00E+00

-E-02 3.98E-03 2 Italicized valu e 2-62 Groundwater MW- B3 MW- 200-A 6.46E-01 4.04E+0 0 4.14E+00 8.66E+0 0 1.94E+02 5.23E+0 1 2.05E+00 9.26E+0 0 4.39E+01 1.93E+0 1 3.15E+01 -2.18E+0 1.13E+00 1.01E+0 0 1.50E+00 -1.97E+0 6.12 E-01 9.86E-0 1 6.65 E-01 1.08E+0 0 8.10E+00 3.55E+0 0 2.14E+00 1.77E-0 1 1.42E+01 9.71E+0 0 1.69E+00 5.77E-0 1 3.17E+00 -3.63E+0 8.29 E-02 -1.38E-0 2 1.46 E-01 2.68E-0 2-7.39E-01 0.00E+0 0 2.28 E-02 1.72E-0 1 es indicate MD C Monitorin g R e MW- 200-B M 2 0 0 -2.26E-01 3.8 4 0 -1.79E+00 7.2 6 1 1.24E+02 7.0 3 0 4.84E+00 4.8 4 1 -4.16E+01 -3.2 01 3.32E+01 -1.6 0 -1.27E+00 -6.

00 -4.69E+00 1.8 2 1 9.98E-01 6.8 6 0 8.47E-01 3.7 3 0 5.08E+00 3.9 2 1 -3.64E-01 3.1 0 0 -1.16E+01 4.1 5 1 5.60E-01 -2.3 90 -3.44E+00 -2.9 2 2 1.51E-02 5.3 3 2 -1.57E-02 -6.

8 0 4.49E+00 -4.

8 1 9.71E-01 9.4 6 C value. e sults (pCi/L)

MW- 0 1-A MW- 201-B 4E-01 -1.04E+00 6E+00 -1.04E+00 3E+01 1.05E+02 4E+00 4.51E+00 0E+01 1.58E+01 7E+01 -7.11E+01 0 4 E-02 1.73E+00 2E+00 -1.91E+00 6E-02 1.02E+00 3E-01 1.80E+00 2E+00 1.17E+00 0E-01 -6.21E-01 5E+00 1.12E+01 9E+00 -2.43E+00 2E+00 -2.60E+00 3E-02 -5.02E-02 8 6 E-03 2.36E-02 8 5 E-01 -1.42E+00 6E-02 3.99E-03 MW- 202-A M W 202-1.06E+00 4.07E-4.34E+00 1.49E+3.36E+02 1.06E+0.00E+00 4.70E

+-3.26E+00 -4.54E

+2.49E+01 -1.05E

+-8.91E-01 1.02E

+-1.94E+00 -3.73E

+1.12E+00 6.05E--3.55E-01 1.04E

-3.88E-01 2.73E

+-4.64E-01 2.86E

+4.11E+00 1.08E+-1.12E+00 -1.18E

+-1.59E+00 -3.49E

+-8.46E-03 1.48E

--2.27E-02 -4.54 E2.20E+00 2.72E

+1.16E-01 3.92E-W- B MW- 203-A -01 1.74E+00 -2+00 2.27E+00 5+02 2.79E+02 2+00 4.54E+00 4+01 -4.95E+01 -

4+01 -2.71E+01 -

4+00 3.48E 9+00 -3.70E+00 -

3-01 1.17E+00 8-01 1.59E+00 1

+00 4.36E+00 4+00 1.48E+00 1

+01 -9.59E-01 4+00 1.93E+00 -

3+00 -4.91E+00 4-01 -5.67E 5-02 -2.27E 3+00 4.07E+00 1

-02 2.94E-02 7MW- 203-B MW- 204-A 2.29 E-01 7.58E-01 5.53E+00 2.69E+0 0 2.79E+02 1.06E+0 2 4.55E+00 4.66E+0 0 4.96E+01 -4.03E+0 1 4.66E+00 -6.22E+0 0 9.55 E-01 1.91E-01 3.80E+00 0.00E+0 0 8.23 E-01 2.01E+0 0.50E+00 2.26E-01 4.17E+00 6.95E+0 0.39E+00 -3.04E-0 1 4.99E+00 2.12E+0 0 3.69E+00 2.36+00 4.05E+00 -4.34E-0 1 5.87 E-02 -5.12E-0 2 3.95 E-02 -2.49E-0 2.03E+01 4.07E+0 0 7.64 E-02 1.56E-01 MW- 204-B 1.27E+00 0 2.57E-01 2 3.49E+01 0 1.30E+01 1 -3.98E+00 0 -2.47E+01 -2.31E-01 0 -1.97E+00 0 6.11E-01 1.28E+00 0 6.31E+00 1.93E+00 0 7.68E+00 6.06E-01 1.66E+00 2 -9.28E-03 2 6.28E-02 0 -1.89E+00 8.24E-02 L L R S G G H C F N C N S N T C E E E P P P A a L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 September 201 4 M G ross Alpha 8 Gross Beta 2 H-3 3 C-14 -9 Fe-55 9 Ni-59 3 Co-60 2 Ni-63 2 Sr-90 -1 Nb-94 -9 Tc-99 -1 Cs-137 3 Eu-152 2 Eu-154 -3 Eu-155 2 Pu-238 1 Pu-239/240 9 Pu-241 3 Am-241 1 a Bold va l ng Water Reac t ation Plan 4 MW-DW5 MW-8.47E-01 3.09 E.96E+00 1.45 E.43E+01 0.00 E 9.44 E-01 -2.70 E 9.39E+00 -3.10 E.13E+00 1.64 E.17E+00 1.32 E.79E+00 2.48 E 1.06E+00 5.90 E 9.45 E-01 -1.39 E 1.54E+00 -4.0 0.97E+00 -7.2 4.48E+00 3.00 E 3.31E+00 -3.93 E.69E+00 1.95 E 1.71 E-02 3.69 E 9.28 E-02 0.00 E.18E+00 -3.68 E 1.28 E-01 3.69 E l ues indicate co n t o r -B11R MW-B11 A E+00 2.07E-0 E+01 3.04E-0 E+00 3.44E+

0 E+00 0.00E+

0 E+01 -3.49E+

0 E+01 -8.49E+

0 E+00 1.22E+

0 E+00 -4.14E-0 E-01 2.80E-0 E+00 -1.29E-0 0E-01 -1.56E+

0 4E-01 9.72E-0 E+00 6.42E+

0 E+00 1.10E+

0 E+00 1.69E+

0 E-02 -5.50E-0 E+00 -1.10E-0 E+00 -2.29E+

0 E-02 -1.69E-0 ncentration gre a Table 2-19 AR MW-200-A 0 1 2.42E-01 01 2.41E+00 01 6.86E+01 00 -4.56E-01 01 -3.35E+01 00 7.84E+00 0 0 3.56E+00 01 3.62E+00 0 1 1.14E+00 01 -1.43E+00 00 -1.57E+00 0 1 2.17E+01 00 -2.39E+00 00 -6.57E-01 00 -8.16E-01 03 2.65E-02 02 5.83E-02 00 -2.23E+00 02 1.10E-01 ater than MDC.

(continued)MW-200-B 2.01E+00 9.11E+00 5.17E+01 -4.98E+00 -4.56E+01 2.37E+01 6.20E-01 -7.87E-01 5.10E-01 -2.68E-01 -1.54E+00 1.94E+00 -1.34E+01 -1.54E+00 -1.64E+00 -6.50E-03 0.00E+00 8.49E+00 2.29E-01 Italicized valu e 2-63 2014 Groun dMW-201-A M1.18E+00 7.36E+00 8.67E+01 2.69E+00 -2.18E+01 -1.99E+01 -7.23E-02 5.00E+00 -1.19E-01 6.56E-01 -7.94E-01 -1.09E+00 4.79E+00 -3.09E+00 -1.48E+00 -3.59E-02 0.00E+00 -6.92E-01 1.40E-01 es indicate MD C dwater Monit o MW-201-B M W1.43E+00 1.03.67E+00 4.8-3.42E+01 -5.

19.28E-01 4.9 42.77E+01 -5.

43.09E+01 -1.

19.50E-01 9.

72.15E+00 8.

2-4.99E-01 6.

76.44E-01 -6.

4-1.95E+00 7.

91.84E+00 -4.

32.53E+00 9.41.94E+00 -3.

64.13E+00 -2.

08.55E-02 1.

11.41E-01 5.8-5.85E-01 0.02.80E-02 6.

6 C value. o rin g Results (p W-202-A MW-2 04E+00 -2.10E-8 6 E-01 2.30E+18E+01 1.04E

+4E+00 -2.72E

+43E+01 3.37E

+18E+01 -4.46E

+7 2 E-01 1.18E+2 5 E-01 -8.30E

-7 0 E-01 5.40E-4 8 E-02 -1.02E

+9 7 E-01 -1.95E

-3 4 E-01 2.31E+0E+00 6.51E+6 7 E-01 4.18E+08E+00 -8.41E

-1 3 E-02 3.63E-8 7 E-02 5.25E-0E+00 -1.76E

+6 2 E-02 9.48E-p Ci/L) 02-B MW-203-A E-01 1.37E+00+00 1.52E+00

+02 -3.44E+0 1+00 -3.95E+0 0+01 -4.95E+0 1+01 5.30E+01

+00 3.67E+00 E-01 1.62E+00

-01 4.80E-01

+00 8.53E-02 E-01 -1.24E+0 0+00 1.56E+00

+00 4.06E+00

+00 -3.33E+0 0 E-01 -9.54E-02

-02 7.08E-02

-02 9.15E-02

+00 5.04E-01

-02 2.51E-01 A MW-203-B -6.68E-01 1.00E+00 1.21E+02 0 4.89E-01 4.32E+01 -4.34E+01 1.99E+00 -1.77E+00 8.70E-01 2.16E+00 0 -3.32E+00 6.84E-01 -1.15E+00 0 -2.31E-01 -3.66E-01 8.12E-02 5.97E-02 -3.71E+00 1.03E-01 MW-204-A 6.00E-01 5.28E+00 6.88E+01 4.73E-01 3.45E+01 -3.13E+01 -3.77E-01 -1.84E-01 9.00E-01 1.18E-01 -1.96E+00 -1.14E+00 -1.92E+01 -4.95E+00 -2.02E+00 -6.45E-04 -5.48E-03 -3.97E+00 1.06E-01 MW-204-B 3.53E+00 0.00E+00 -1.21E+02 9.46E-01 -9.25E+01 -1.87E+01 2.05E+00 3.94E-01 2.30E-01 -1.88E+00 3.89E-01 1.24E+00 2.23E+00 2.36E+00 9.46E-01 -3.26E-02 7.02E-02 -6.46E+00 2.69E-01 L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan Fi g ur e o r e 2-1 LACB WR Site Map 64 - Open Land S S urve y Units a n n d Classificati o o n L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r Figure 2-2 LACBWR 2-65 Site Map - Bu i i ldin g s Identif i ication La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-3 r LACBW R 2-66 R Site Drai n n a g e and S e e wer Map La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-4 r LACBW R 2-67 R LCE Exc l l usion Area (Class 1)

La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi gu W ater Reacto r Plan ure 2-5 N r N on Impact e 2-68 e d Open La a nd Sampli n ng Location s La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-6 r Class 1 O 2-69 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-7 r Class 2 O 2-70 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 F W ater Reacto r Plan F i gure 2-8 r Class 3 O 2-71 O pen Land S S amplin g L L ocations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 W ater Reacto r Plan Figure 2-9 r 9 Concr e 2-72 e te Core Sa mmplin g Lo c c ations La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi g u r W ater Reacto r Plan r e 2-9 (cont i r i nued)2-73 Concrete C C ore Sampl i i n g Locatio n n s La Cros s License T Revisio n s e Boiling W Terminatio n n 0 Fi g u r W ater Reacto r Plan r e 2-9 (cont i r i nued)2-74 Concrete C C ore Sampl i i n g Locatio n n s L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r Figure 2-10 LACBWR S i 2-75 ite - Typical G e eolo g ical Cross s-Section L L R L a Crosse Boili n License Termin Revision 0 ng Water Reac t ation Plan o r Figure 2-1 1 1 Groundwa t 2-76 t er Samplin g W Wells - LACB W WR Site LA CROSSE BOILIN G WATER REACTOR LICENSE TERMINATION PLAN CHAPTER 2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION