RA-18-0204, Transmittal of Technical Specification Bases

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:55, 5 February 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Transmittal of Technical Specification Bases
ML18316A009
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/12/2018
From: Jones B K
Duke Energy Progress
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
RA-18-0204
Download: ML18316A009 (116)


Text

SHEARON HARRIS - UNIT 1 B 3/4 4-2g Amendment No. 145 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BASES 3/4.4.5 STEAM GENERATOR (SG) TUBE INTEGRITY (continued) ACTIONS a.1 and a.2 ACTIONS a.1 and a.2 apply if it is discovered that one or more SG tubes examined in an Inservice Inspection satisfy the tube plugging criteria but were not plugged in accordance with the Steam Generator Program as required by Surveillance Requirement 4.4.5.2. An evaluation of SG tube integrity of the affected tube(s) must be made. SG tube integrity is based on meeting the SG performance criteria described in the Steam Generator Program. The SG plugging criteria define limits on SG tube degradation that allow for flaw growth between inspections while still providing assurance that the SG performance criteria will continue to be met. In order to determine if a SG tube that should have been plugged has tube integrity, an evaluation must be completed that demonstrates that the SG performance criteria will continue to be met until the next refueling outage or SG tube inspection. The tube integrity determination is based on the estimated condition of the tube at the time the situation is discovered and the estimated growth of the degradation prior to the next SG tube inspection. If it is determined that tube integrity is not being maintained, ACTION b. applies. An allowed completion time of seven days is sufficient to complete the evaluation while minimizing the risk of plant operation with a SG tube that may not have tube integrity. If the evaluation determines that the affected tube(s) have tube integrity, ACTION a.2 allows plant operation to continue until the next refueling outage or SG inspection provided the inspection interval continues to be supported by an operational assessment that reflects the affected tubes.

However, the affected tube(s) must be plugged prior to entering HOT SHUTDOWN following the next refueling outage or SG inspection. This allowed completion time is acceptable since operation until the next inspection is supported by the operational assessment.

ACTION b. If the requirements and associated completion time of ACTION a. are not met or if SG tube integrity is not being maintained, the reactor must be brought to HOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and COLD SHUTDOWN within the next 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />. The allowed completion times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the desired plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.