IR 05000312/2007005
| ML073040450 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco, 07200011 |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2007 |
| From: | Spitzberg D B Division of Nuclear Materials Safety IV |
| To: | Shetler J Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) |
| References | |
| IR-07-001, IR-07-005 | |
| Download: ML073040450 (14) | |
Text
October 31, 2007
Mr. James Shetler, Assistant General ManagerEnergy Supply Sacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 'S' Street P.O. Box 15830 Sacramento, California 95852
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT 050-00312/07-005; 072-00011/07-001
Dear Mr. Shetler:
An NRC inspection was conducted on October 16-17, 2007 at your Rancho Seco IndependentSpent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI). On October 17, 2007, at the conclusion of the inspection, an exit meeting was held with Mr. Bob Jones and Mr. Jim Field of your staff. The enclosed report presents the scope and results of that inspection. The inspection was an examination of ISFSI operations conducted under your license as theyrelate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license. The inspection included examination and review of the ISFSI materiel condition and spent fuel inventory, technical specification surveillances, radiologicalcontrols and environmental monitoring, operations and maintenance, quality assurance audits, and program changes and safety reviews. No violations of NRC regulations were identified during the inspection.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letterand its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC PublicDocument Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, please contact Mr. Scott Atwater at817-860-8286 or the undersigned at (817) 860-8191.
Sincerely,/RA/D. Blair Spitzberg, Ph.D., ChiefRepository and Spent Fuel Safety BranchDocket Nos.:050-00312; 072-00011 License Nos.:DPR-54; SNM-2510
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 050-00312/07-005; 072-00011/07-001 w/Attachment Sacramento Municipal Utility District-2-cc w/enclosure:Thomas A. Baxter, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 2300 N. Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037QA/Licensing SuperintendentRancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, CA 95638-9799Sacramento County Board of Supervisors 700 H. Street, Suite 2450 Sacramento, CA 95814Assistant General CounselSacramento Municipal Utility District 6201 S Street P.O. Box 15830 Sacramento, CA 95852-1830Radiation Program DirectorCalifornia Radiologic Health Branch State Department of Health Services P.O. Box 997414 (MS 7610)
Sacramento, CA 95899-7414Site Document Control SupervisorSacramento Municipal Utility District Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station 14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, CA 95638-9799Commissioner's OfficeCalifornia Energy Commission 1516 Ninth Street (MS 34)
Sacramento, CA 95814-5512 Sacramento Municipal Utility District-3-bcc w/enclosure (via ADAMS distrib):
EECollins DBSpitzberg LDWert CLCain JBHickman, FSME/DWMEP/DURLD ACMcMurtray, NSIR/DPR/DDEP/LI DBSpitzberg
JRHall EMGarcia SPAtwater RITS Coordinator FCDB FileADAMS: YesNo Initials: SPA Publicly Available Non-Publicly AvailableSensitiveNon-SensitiveDOCUMENT NAME: s:\dnms\fcdb\spa\rs07-01.wpd final r:\_dnmsRIV:DNMS:FCDBC:FCDBSPAtwaterDBSpitzberg/RA//RA/10/29/07OFFICIAL RECORD COPY T=Telephone E=E-mail F=Fax Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV Docket Nos.:050-00312; 072-00011License Nos.:DPR-54; SNM-2510 Report Nos.:050-00312/07-005; 072-00011/07-001 Licensee:Sacramento Municipal Utility District Facility:Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Location:14440 Twin Cities Road Herald, California Dates:October 16-17, 2007 Inspectors:Scott Atwater, Health Physicist Approved By:D. Blair Spitzberg, Ph.D., ChiefRepository and Spent Fuel Safety Branch
Attachments:
Supplemental Information ADAMS Entry:IR 05000312-07-005; 0720011-07-001 on 10/16-17/07;Sacramento Municipal Utility District; Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station. ISFSI Report; No Violations.
Enclosure -2-EXECUTIVE SUMMARYRancho Seco Nuclear Generating StationNRC Inspection Report 050-00312/07-005; 072-00011/07-001The Rancho Seco facility was in the final stages of decommissioning. The major componentsin the auxiliary building and reactor building had been removed, packaged and shipped for disposal. Demolition of the reactor building interior concrete structures was in progress. All spent fuel assemblies and Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste had been stored at the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) and the spent fuel pool and had been dismantled. Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation*The ISFSI was being maintained in good materiel condition and the pad was clear ofcombustibles. The Horizontal Storage Module (HSM) tamper-indicating welds were intact and had been inspected annually. The notification to the NRC of a potential spent fuel misloading was made in accordance with the ISFSI technical specifications and a plan to restore compliance was being developed (Section 1.1).*The temperature instruments on the HSMs were functional and indicated that the HSMswere removing decay heat from the spent fuel within the design envelope. The HSM daily monitoring was meeting the ISFSI Technical Specification surveillance requirements (Section 1.2).*The HSMs were properly posted as radiation areas. The licensee's environmentalmonitoring program was meeting the ISFSI Technical Specification requirements.
Doses to the public from ISFSI operations were within limits (Section 1.3).
- The ISFSI fire detection system was being maintained in an operable condition and wasbeing tested annually to ensure continued operability (Section 1.4).*The surveillance of the last semi-annual Special Nuclear Material (SNM) inventorycalculation indicated the calculation was performed using acceptable computer codesand the results were accurate (Section 1.5).*The surveillances of the Greater than Class C (GTCC) canister fabrication were detailedand thorough. The canister material, rolling, welding, and testing were consistent with the procurement specifications (Section 1.5).*Program changes made since the last inspection were consistent with the license andhad not reduced the effectiveness of the Rancho Seco Emergency Plan, Quality Assurance Program or Radiation Protection Program (Section 1.6).
Enclosure -3-Report DetailsSummary of Facility StatusThe Rancho Seco facility was in the final stages of decommissioning. The major componentsin the auxiliary building had been removed, packaged and shipped for disposal. In the reactor building, the four reactor coolant pumps, two steam generators, pressurizer, core flood tanks, reactor vessel, and reactor vessel head had been removed and shipped for disposal.
Demolition of the reactor building interior concrete structures was in progress. Twenty-one canisters containing 493 spent fuel assemblies, and one canister containing Greater than ClassC (GTCC) waste had been stored at the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
and the spent fuel pool and had been dismantled.1Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (IP 60855)1.1ISFSI Materiel Condition and Spent Fuel Inventory1.1.1Inspection ScopeVerification that the ISFSI is being maintained in good condition and that combustible materialsexceeding the bounding fire loading have not accumulated in the vicinity of the loaded Horizontal Storage Modules (HSMs).Verification that a physical inventory is being conducted on all spent fuel stored at the ISFSIevery 12 months. Verification that tamper-indicating seals are present and intact.1.1.2Observations and FindingsA tour of the ISFSI indicated the welds on the Horizontal Storage Modules (HSM) doors wereintact and the air inlet and outlet screens on all HSMs were clear of debris. There was minimal erosion under both inner and outer ISFSI fences. There were no vehicles parked inside the ISFSI and the pad was clear of combustibles. The licensee had performed the last annual spent fuel inventory on May 10, 2007 using Surveillance Procedure SP.642, Revision 6. No discrepancies were identified.On November 6, 2006 the licensee made a 24-hour notification to the NRC concerning apotential fuel misloading at the Rancho Seco ISFSI. This notification met the requirements of ISFSI Technical Specification 2.2.1 and was documented in NRC Licensee Event Report
- 42968. Based on the differences in the definition of damaged fuel presented in Rancho Seco Administrative Procedure, RSAP-0112, "Fuel Assembly Visual Inspection", Revision 2 and the commitments made in various licensing documents, Rancho Seco management had determined that a potential existed that damaged fuel assemblies may have been placed in a fuel canister licensed only for intact assemblies. On December 6, 2006 the licensee submitted to the NRC their 30-day followup letter to thenotification (ML063470060), as required by ISFSI Technical Specification 2.2.1. The letter stated that one spent fuel assembly had confirmed cladding damage and five other assemblies had potential cladding damage greater than hairline cracks or pinhole leaks. The 30-day letter Enclosure -4-concluded that there was no imminent concern for continued safe storage of the fuel. At thetime of the inspection, Rancho Seco was consulting with the canister vendor, Transnuclear, to develop a plan for restoring compliance. The licensee was tracking completion of the corrective actions under Commitment Tracking System #53617, ComTrack Log #CL-0056, and Potential Deviation from Quality #05-0003.1.1.3ConclusionsThe ISFSI was being maintained in good materiel condition and the pad was clear ofcombustibles. The HSM tamper-indicating welds were intact and were being inspected annually. The notification to the NRC of a potential spent fuel misloading was made in accordance with the ISFSI technical specifications and a plan to restore compliance was being developed.1.2Technical Specification Surveillance1.2.1Inspection ScopeVerification that routine activities are performed in accordance with approved procedures, andthat surveillances are being conducted at the specified intervals.1.2.2Observations and FindingsRancho Seco ISFSI Technical Specification 5.5.3 required daily monitoring of the HorizontalStorage Modules. The monitoring included verification that the screens on the inlet and outlet air vents were not blocked or damaged, and verification that the concrete temperatures were within tolerance. The technical specification limited concrete temperatures to a maximum of 225 degrees F with no more than an 80 degrees F temperature rise in any 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> period.Each HSM was equipped with a thermocouple imbedded in the concrete directly above thestored canister. Each thermocouple provided a direct temperature output to the Plant Integrated Computer System (PICS). The concrete temperature high alarm was set at 220 degrees F. The HSM thermocouples were functional and the PICS station was staffed. During the ISFSI tour, the ambient temperature was 58 degrees F and the HSM roof temperatures ranged from 84 to 98 degrees F. The HSM differential temperatures of 26 to 40 degrees F indicated the HSMs were functioning as designed.The licensee used Operations Surveillance Procedure, SP-10, "ISFSI & Instrument Checks &System Verification Daily Surveillance", Revision 1 to document completion of Technical Specification 5.5.3 HSM monitoring. A review of the completed SP-10 data sheets from August 1, 2007 to the time of inspection indicated compliance with Technical Specification 5.5.3.1.2.3ConclusionsThe temperature instruments on the HSMs were functional and indicated that the HSMs wereremoving decay heat from the spent fuel within the design envelope. The HSM daily monitoring was meeting the ISFSI Technical Specification surveillance requirements.
Enclosure -5-1.3Radiological Controls and Environmental Monitoring1.3.1Inspection ScopeVerification that the radiological postings are consistent with 10 CFR Part 20, and reflect themeasured dose rates at the ISFSI.Verification that the dose to the public from ISFSI operations is within the 10 CFR 104(a) limits.
1.3.2Observations and FindingsA tour of the ISFSI indicated that the HSM access boundary was established at approximately10 feet from the HSM doors on the east and west faces and at the exterior shield walls on the north and south faces. The area was posted as a Radiation Area.The third quarter 2007 ISFSI radiation survey was conducted on September 27, 2007, inaccordance with Radiation Protection Procedure RP.305.08A, "Routine and Radiation WorkPermit Surveys", Revision 6. Survey #S2007-02428 documented contact dose rates on the HSM doors of 1.5 to 2.5 mrem/hour gamma and less than 1.0 mrem/hour neutron. Dose rates at the HSM screens were 6-10 mrem/hour gamma and less than 1.0 mrem/hour neutron.Rancho Seco ISFSI Technical Specification 5.5.2 required a radiological environmentalmonitoring program to ensure the annual dose equivalent to any real individual located outsidethe ISFSI controlled area did not exceed the 10 CFR 72.104(a) limit of 25 mrem to the whole body during normal operations and anticipated occurrences. The licensee had established four monitoring locations at the site boundary for detecting direct radiation from the ISFSI. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for January-December 2006 indicated thatthe annual dose from ISFSI operations was below the 10 CFR 72.104(a) limit. Rancho Seco ISFSI Technical Specification 5.5.2.d required that an annual report be submittedto the Commission specifying the quantity of each of the principal radionuclides released to the environment in liquid and in gaseous effluents during the previous calendar year of operation.
10 CFR 72.44(d)(3) specified that the report must be submitted within 60 days after the end of the 12-month monitoring period. Spent fuel was loaded into the Rancho Seco ISFSI between April 2001 and August 2002. No ISFSI effluent release report was issued for 2001 and the reports for calender years 2002 and 2003 were late. The three reports did not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 72.44(d)(3) and the licensee entered this deficiency into their corrective action program. The short term corrective action was to combine the ISFSI effluent release report with the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, to ensure thedeadline was not missed in the future. The long term corrective action was to seek relief from the reporting requirement altogether, since the Rancho Seco ISFSI is a sealed system with no gaseous or liquid effluents. NRC Inspection Followup Item 072-00011/2004-01-01 was opened to track completion of both the short term and long term corrective actions.In a letter to the NRC dated July 19, 2004, Rancho Seco requested relief from the requirementsunder 10 CFR 72.44(d)(3) and ISFSI Technical Specification 5.5.2.d to submit an annual radioactive effluent release report for the ISFSI. In a letter to Rancho Seco dated March 21, 2005, the NRC granted an exemption from 10 CFR 72.44(d)(3) and issued an amendment to the Rancho Seco ISFSI license that deleted Technical Specification 5.5.2.d.
Enclosure -6-The annual ISFSI effluent release report is no longer required and Inspection Followup Item072-00011/2004-01-01 has been closed. 1.3.3ConclusionsThe HSMs were properly posted as radiation areas. The licensees environmental monitoringprogram met the ISFSI Technical Specification requirements, and doses to the public from ISFSI operations were within the 10 CFR 104(a) limits.
1.4Operations and Maintenance1.4.1Inspection ScopeVerification that the ISFSI equipment is being maintained in an operable condition and is being tested periodically to ensure continued operability.1.4.2Observations and FindingsThe latest annual test of the ISFSI fire detection system was conducted on June 4, 2007 inaccordance with Surveillance Procedure SP-366, "Annual Fire Protection System Functional Test (ISFSI Electrical Building)", Revision 2. The testing verified that the smoke detectors were operable and that the supervisory trouble circuit responded to failed inputs. No discrepancies were identified.During this inspection two railroad locomotives passed within approximately 80 yards of theISFSI. Each locomotive was equipped with a 4,350 gallon diesel fuel tank. The ISFSI fire hazards analysis did not evaluate the potential burning of 8,700 gallons of diesel fuel within 80 meters of the ISFSI. However the hazards analysis stated that "positive drainage of the basemat toward the site drainage system ensures that the diesel will runoff away from the HSM". The licensee stated that the potential for any fire to migrate uphill from the rail line and engulf the ISFSI was not credible, and therefore did not need to be evaluated. The NRC inspector concurred with this conclusion.1.4.3ConclusionsThe ISFSI fire detection system was being maintained in an operable condition and was beingtested annually to ensure continued operability.1.5Quality Assurance Audits1.5.1Inspection ScopeVerification that audits are being performed to assess the effectiveness of the QualityAssurance Program. Verify that purchased ISFSI equipment and material conforms to procurement documents.
Enclosure -7-1.5.2Observations and FindingsThe licensee conducted a surveillance of the semi-annual Special Nuclear Material (SNM)inventory data sent to DOE/Nuclear Assurance Corporation (NAC). The surveillance was completed on April 10, 2006 as documented in Surveillance Report 06-S-0067. The semi-
annual SNM inventory data was properly calculated using acceptable computer codes.The licensee conducted eleven surveillances of the Greater than Class C (GTCC) canisterfabrication between July 27, 2004 and November 2, 2004. The results were documented in Surveillance Reports 04-S-026, 027, 029, 032, 033, 034, 039, 040, 041, 045, and 046. The canister material was supplied by ESCO and the Certified Material Test Reports were complete.
The canister shells were rolled by Thompson Metal Fabricators. Minor discrepancies were noted which were later corrected by the canister fabricator, Therm-Flite. The canisters and shield plug were also fabricated by Therm-Flite. The fabrication documentation (including welding and NDE records) was complete and accurate. Helium Leak Testing of the canister shell was performed by HIT Inspection. The test results were acceptable.The licensee conducted a surveillance of the Greater than Class C (GTCC) canister prior toloading. The results were documented in Surveillance Report 065-S-006, dated February 7, 2006. The canister was free of foreign materials, the siphon port was clear, and the lid placement was within design tolerances.1.5.3ConclusionsThe surveillance of the last semi-annual SNM inventory calculation indicated the calculation wasperformed using acceptable computer codes and the results were accurate.The surveillances of the Greater than Class C (GTCC) canister fabrication were detailed andthorough. The canister material, rolling, welding, and testing were consistent with the procurement specifications.1.6Program Changes and Safety Reviews1.6.1Inspection ScopeVerification that changes made to the programs and procedures since the last inspection areconsistent with license or Certificate of Compliance requirements, and do not reduce the effectiveness of the programs.1.6.2Observations and FindingsThe licensee performed the following program changes since the last ISFSI inspection inMay 2004.*Rancho Seco Emergency Plan Change 5, Revision 2 made editorial and administrativechanges to simplify the emergency response with all fuel stored at the ISFSI.
Enclosure -8-*Rancho Seco Emergency Plan and Implementing Procedure EPIP-01, Revision 4reflected changes to the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual resulting from the dismantlement of the onsite retention basins, radioactive effluent monitor RI-1507A, and associated onsite piping. The revision acknowledged removal of any major radioactive liquid effluent and deleted the Emergency Plan response to a "High Liquid Effluent" alarm for Unusual Event or Alert.*Rancho Seco Emergency Plan Revision 3 reflected relocation of the Technical SupportCenter.*Rancho Seco Quality Manual (RSQM)Section II, "Quality Assurance Program (QAP.)",Revision 11 implemented a previously reviewed and approved change to the fire protection program audit requirements. *Rancho Seco Quality Manual (RSQM) Policy, Revision 8 and RSQM Section I,"Organization" Revision 12 reflected changes to the organization as described in Rancho Seco Administrative Procedure RSAP-0101. The organizational changes included: 1) replacement of the Decommissioning Project Manager with two new positions, the Dismantlement Supervisor - Operations and the Dismantlement Supervisor - Radiological Assessment; 2) elimination of the QA/Lic./Admin/Trng Superintendent position and transfer of all responsibilities to the new Supervising Quality Engineer position; and 3) a change to the reporting chain for the Supervisor, District Security Operations.*Rancho Seco Quality Manual (RSQM)Section I, "Organization" Revision 13 modified theRancho Seco organization to reflect that the Manager, Plant Closure and Decommissioning now reports to the Manager, Power Generation.
- Rancho Seco Quality Manual (RSQM)Section XVIII, "Audits", Revision 11 implementedNRC Order for Modification of the Rancho Seco ISFSI license, dated August 18, 2004 which required an individual with knowledge of the ISFSI access authorization program to participate in the annual security audit.*Chemistry Administrative Procedure CAP-0002, "Off-site Dose Calculation Manual",Revision 17 removed the Auxiliary Building stack from the gaseous effluent pathway.
This was based on a previous evaluation that approved removal of the Auxiliary Building ventilation system from service as part of decommissioning. *Chemistry Administrative Procedure CAP-0002, "Off-site Dose Calculation Manual",Revision 18 removed the gaseous effluent release pathway once the Auxiliary Building ventilation system had been dismantled and all spent fuel was in the ISFSI.1.6.3ConclusionsThe program changes made since the last inspection were consistent with the Certificate ofCompliance and had not reduced the effectiveness of the Rancho Seco Emergency Plan, Quality Assurance Program or Radiation Protection Program.
Enclosure -9-2Exit MeetingOn October 17, 2007, at the conclusion of the inspection, the inspector held an exit meetingwith representatives of licensee management to present the preliminary inspection results. The licensee representatives acknowledged the results presented. No information reviewed by the inspector was identified as proprietary.
Attachment PARTIAL LIST OF PERSONS CONTACTEDSacramento Municipal Utility DistrictM. Bua - Superintendent, Radiation Protection/ChemistryJ. Field - Superintendent, Engineering R. Jones - Supervising Quality Engineer D. Koontz - ISFSI Supervisor J. Loy - Nuclear Licensing Instructor E. Reese - Security Officer G. Roberts - Superintendent, Maintenance M. Steinbacher - Radiation Protection Supervisor A. Zwierzynski, ISFSI TechnicianINSPECTION PROCEDURES USEDIP 60855Operation of an Independent Spent Fuel InstallationITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSEDOpened None ClosedInspection Followup Item 072-00011/2004-01-01; Timeliness of the Annual Radioactive EffluentRelease Report.
Discussed NoneLIST OF ACRONYMSCFRCode of Federal RegulationsHSM Horizontal Storage Modules ISFSIIndependent Spent Fuel Storage Installation PICS Plant Integrated Computer System SNMSpecial Nuclear Material