L-2009-217, St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2, Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue

St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2, Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue

ML092990394
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	10/16/2009
From:	Johnston G L Florida Power & Light Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2009-217
Download: ML092990394 (21)

Text

Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 October 16, 2009 L-2009-217 FIPL 10 CFR 26.9 10 CFR 26.205 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Document Control Desk One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue This letter provides a request for exemption from certain requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue. Specifically, the letter requests exemption from certain specified requirements of Part 26 during preparations for severe weather conditions.

During severeweather conditions (i.e., tropical storm or hurricane force winds), adherence to all work hour controls requirements could impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to prepare the site for a pending severe weather event and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status.Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9, Florida Power and Light (FPL) requests Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval of an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during preparations for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. This exemption is similar to the exception from meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's Emergency Plan.Parts 26.205(c) and (d) establish requirements for work hours scheduling and work hour controls for individuals (covered workers) subject to these controls.

Entry into a severe weather situation involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds can impose conditions similar to entry into the Emergency Plan where the imposition of work hour controls on vital personnel could impede theability to focus on plant safety and security and may be detrimental to the health and safety of the public.The Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue, Subpart I to 10 CFR 26 that includes Sections 26.205(c) and (d), is required to be implemented by October 1, 2009. St. Lucie Units I and 2 aremost vulnerable to tropical storms and hurricanes from June through November.

Consequently,FPL requests that the NRC review this request for acceptability at the earliest feasible date.A-og.an FPL Group company Florida Power & light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, Fl34957 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Document Control Desk One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 RE: St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 October 16,2009 Request for Exemption from Certain Requirements ofthe Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue L-2009-217 10 CFR 26.9 10 CFR 26.205 This letter provides a request for exemption from certain requirements of the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue. Specifically, the letter requests exemption from certain specified requirements of Part 26 during preparations for severe weather conditions.

During severe weather conditions (Le., tropical storm or hurricane force winds), adherence to all work hour controls requirements could impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to prepare the site for a pending severe weather event and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. Pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9, Florida Power and Light (FPL) requests Nuclear Regulatory Commission approval of an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205( c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during preparations for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. This exemption is similar to the exception from meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's Emergency Plan. Parts 26.205(c) and (d) establish requirements for work hours scheduling and work hour controls for individuals (covered workers) subject to these controls.

Entry into a severe weather situation involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds can impose conditions similar to entry into the Emergency Plan where the imposition of work hour controls on vital personnel could impede the ability to focus on plant safety and security and may be detrimental to the health and safety of the public. The Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue, Subpart I to 10 CFR 26 that includes Sections 26.205(c) and (d), is required to be implemented by October 1,2009. St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 are most vulnerable to tropical storms and hurricanes from June through November.

Consequently, FPL requests that the NRC review this request for acceptability at the earliest feasible date. an FPl Group company L-2009-217 Page 2 As demonstrated in the attachment to this letter, the requested exemption:

• Is authorized by law;* Will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security; and* Is otherwise in the public interest.

This exemption from the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue is necessary until the Rule can be changed so that the exemption is no longer needed. When the Rule is changed and the exemption is no longer needed, FPL will submit a letter to the NRC stating that the exemption is no longer needed.

This commitment is provided in Attachment 3 to this letter. There are no other licensee commitments in this letter.The request for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds is attached.If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact Ken Frehafer at (772) 467-7748 Sincerely, Gordon L. Joh stonSite Vice Presi ent St. Lucie Plant Attachments1. Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) for Meeting Work Hour Controls During Declarations of Severe Weather Conditions Involving Tropical Storm or Hurricane Force Winds 2. 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)3. Commitment Summary As demonstrated in the attachment to this letter, the requested exemption:

• Is authorized by law;

• Will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security; and

• Is otherwise in the public interest.

L-2009-217 Page 2 This exemption from the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue is necessary until the Rule can be changed so that the exemption is no longer needed. When the Rule is changed and the exemption is no longer needed, FPL will submit a letter to the NRC stating that the exemption is no longer needed. This commitment is provided in Attachment 3 to this letter. There are no other licensee commitments in this letter. The request for exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds is attached.

If there are any questions regarding this request, please contact Ken Frehafer at (772) 467-7748 Sincerely, Gordon L. Joh Site Vice Prest St. Lucie Plant Attachments

1. Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 26.205( c) and (d) for Meeting Work Hour Controls During Declarations of Severe Weather Conditions Involving Tropical Storm or Hurricane Force Winds 2. 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) 3. Commitment Summary St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 14 Attachment 1 Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)for Meeting Work Hour Controls during Declarations of Severe Weather Conditions Involving Tropical Storm or Hurricane Force Winds St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 14 for Meeting Work Hour Controls during Declarations of Severe Weather Conditions Involving Tropical Storm or Hurricane Force Winds St. Lucie Units I and 2 L-2009-217Docket Nos.

50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 14Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)for Meeting Work Hour Controls During Declarations of Severe Weather Conditions Involving Tropical Storm or Hurricane Force Winds 1.0 Purpose This enclosure provides supporting justification pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9 for an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during preparation for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds.Specifically, the exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring severe weather preparations and thepossible sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. FPL would not need to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time that severe weather preparations are commenced.

This exemption would continue through storm crew sequestering until exit conditions aresatisfied. The specific entry and exit conditions are specified in Section 3.0 of this enclosure.The exemption would only apply to individuals involved with severe weather preparations andstorm crew personnel who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5). Whenstorm crew sequestering exit conditions are met, full compliance with 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)will be required.2.0 Background Parts 26.205(c) and (d) to 10 CFR establish requirements for work hour scheduling and work hour controls for any individual who performs duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through(a)(5). The individuals performing these duties are referred to as "covered workers." Part 26.205(c) requires licensees to schedule the work hours of covered workers with the objective ofpreventing impairment from fatigue due to the duration, frequency, or sequencing of successive shifts. Part 26.205(d) provides for specific work hour controls as follows: " Work hour limits over specified periods of time;* Specified break periods; and* Minimum days off averaged over a shift schedule.Separate days off requirements are established for non-outage versus outage periods.St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR 26.205( c) and (d) for Meeting Work Hour Controls During Declarations of Severe Weather Conditions Involving Tropical Storm or Hurricane Force Winds 1.0 Purpose L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 14 This enclosure provides supporting justification pursuant to 10 CFR 26.9 for an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during preparation for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. Specifically, the exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring severe weather preparations and the possible sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. FPL would not need to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time that severe weather preparations are commenced.

This exemption would continue through storm crew sequestering until exit conditions are satisfied.

The specific entry and exit conditions are specified in Section 3.0 of this enclosure.

The exemption would only apply to individuals involved with severe weather preparations and storm crew personnel who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(l) through (a)(5). When storm crew sequestering exit conditions are met, full compliance with 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) will be required.

2.0 Background Parts 26.205(c) and (d) to 10 CFR establish requirements for work hour scheduling and work hour controls for any individual who performs duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(l) through (a)(5). The individuals performing these duties are referred to as "covered workers." Part 26.205(c) requires licensees to schedule the work hours of covered workers with the objective of preventing impairment from fatigue due to the duration, frequency, or sequencing of successive shifts. Part 26.205(d) provides for specific work hour controls as follows:

• Work hour limits over specified periods of time;

• Specified break periods; and

• Minimum days off averaged over a shift schedule.

Separate days off requirements are established for non-outage versus outage periods.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment I Page 3 of 14The complete text of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) to 10 CFR is provided in Attachment 2 to this correspondence.

Part 26.207(d) states that licensees need not meet the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d)during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's Emergency Plan.3.0 Discussion St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 are located on Hutchinson Island off the Florida east coast and has been impacted by numerous tropical storms and hurricanes since first placed into commercialoperation. The St. Lucie hurricane plan includes severe weather preparations and augmented staffing for tropical storms and hurricanes and is governed by approved plant procedures.

The hurricane staffing procedure provides specific guidance for crew staffing levels and for the process of sequestering the storm crews. The hurricane staffing procedure includes provisions for augmented storm crew manning at the facility including the emergency response organization (ERO) to ensure the safe operation of the St. Lucie units during storm conditions.

Site preparation activities in advance of the storm are governed by the severe weather preparation procedure and are equally important for ensuring the safe operation of the facility.

These preparations are controlled via checklists for every plant department to ensure that the facility is properly secured for severe weather.The St. Lucie hurricane staffing procedure provides direction for activation of the storm crew.The storm crew is activated upon the direction of the Hurricane Response Coordinator, typically the site Plant General Manager or designee. This individual is qualified as an Emergency Coordinator during a declared emergency, as defined in the St. Lucie Emergency Plan. The storm crew consists of enough individuals to man two 12-hour shifts of workers consisting of personnel from operations, maintenance, health physics, chemistry, engineering, and security to maintain the safe and secure operation of the facility. These crews include ERO personnel.

The hurricane plan provides for bunking facilities in the protected area and/or power block that allows restorative sleep for the off-crew.

After the storm has passed, it is difficult to predict when relief personnel could return to the site based on the degree of surrounding infrastructure damage caused by the storm and the different locations that personnel chose to evacuate to avoid the storm. Typically, access to the area following storm damage is controlled by local government officials. The goal is to provide relief as soon as circumstances allow. When enough personnel are available to support meeting the requirements of Part 26.205(c) and (d), full compliance with the work hour rule can be met. The Hurricane Response Coordinator is in the best position to make this decision.Based on the circumstances, St. Lucie is primarily concerned with the ability to meet rule requirements specified in Parts 26.205(d)(2)(ii) and 26.205(d)(3). Part 26.205(d)(2)(ii) requires that licensees ensure that covered individuals have, at a minimum, a 34-hour break in any 9-dayperiod. Part 26.205(d)(3) requires that licensees ensure that covered individuals have, at a minimum, the number of days off specified.

This is commonly referred to as the required minimum days off averaged over a shift cycle. The only remedy provided by the Fatigue St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 14 The complete text of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) to 10 CFR is provided in Attachment 2 to this correspondence.

Part 26.207(d) states that licensees need not meet the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's Emergency Plan. 3.0 Discussion St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 are located on Hutchinson Island off the Florida east coast and has been impacted by numerous tropical storms and hurricanes since first placed into commercial operation.

The St. Lucie hurricane plan includes severe weather preparations and augmented staffing for tropical storms and hurricanes and is governed by approved plant procedures.

The hurricane staffing procedure provides specific guidance for crew staffing levels and for the process of sequestering the storm crews. The hurricane staffing procedure includes provisions for augmented storm crew manning at the facility including the emergency response organization (ERO) to ensure the safe operation of the St. Lucie units during storm conditions.

Site preparation activities in advance of the storm are governed by the severe weather preparation procedure and are equally important for ensuring the safe operation of the facility.

These preparations are controlled via checklists for every plant department to ensure that the facility is properly secured for severe weather. The St. Lucie hurricane staffing procedure provides direction for activation of the storm crew. The storm crew is activated upon the direction of the Hurricane Response Coordinator, typically the site Plant General Manager or designee.

This individual is qualified as an Emergency Coordinator during a declared emergency, as defined in the St. Lucie Emergency Plan. The storm crew consists of enough individuals to man two 12-hour shifts of workers consisting of personnel from operations, maintenance, health physics, chemistry, engineering, and security to maintain the safe and secure operation of the facility.

These crews include ERO personnel.

The hurricane plan provides for bunking facilities in the protected area and/or power block that allows restorative sleep for the off-crew.

After the storm has passed, it is difficult to predict when relief personnel could return to the site based on the degree of surrounding infrastructure damage caused by the storm and the different locations that personnel chose to evacuate to avoid the storm. Typically, access to the area following storm damage is controlled by local government officials.

The goal is to provide relief as soon as circumstances allow. When enough personnel are available to support meeting the requirements of Part 26.205(c) and (d), full compliance with the work hour rule can be met. The Hurricane Response Coordinator is in the best position to make this decision.

Based on the circumstances, St. Lucie is primarily concerned with the ability to meet rule requirements specified in Parts 26.205(d)(2)(ii) and 26.205(d)(3).

Part 26.205(d)(2)(ii) requires that licensees ensure that covered individuals have, at a minimum, a 34-hour break in any 9-day period. Part 26.205(d)(3) requires that licensees ensure that covered individuals have, at a minimum, the number of days off specified.

This is commonly referred to as the required minimum days off averaged over a shift cycle. The only remedy provided by the Fatigue St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment I Page 4 of 14 Management Rule, if these requirements can not be met, is granting a waiver under Part 26.207.The requirements for granting waivers are very specific and manpower intensive.The NRC recognizes that there are special circumstances where the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) can not be met. Regarding plant emergencies, the NRC stated the following when publishing the Final Fitness for Duty Rule: "Section 26.207(d)

[Plant emergencies]

adds the potential to temporarily waive the requirements of § 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's emergency plan." ."Plant emergencies are extraordinary circumstances that may be most effectively addressed through staff augmentation that can only be practically achieved through the use of work hours in excess of the limits of § 26.205(c) and (d). The objective of the temporary exemption is to ensure that the control of work hours and management of worker fatigue do not impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to a plant emergency and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. At the conclusion of the declared emergency, the rule would require licensees to again comply with the work hour controls." 1 1 Federal Register, Volume 73, Number 62, Page 17148, March 31, 2008.St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 14 Management Rule, if these requirements can not be met, is granting a waiver under Part 26.207. The requirements for granting waivers are very specific and manpower intensive.

The NRC recognizes that there are special circumstances where the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) can not be met. Regarding plant emergencies, the NRC stated the following when publishing the Final Fitness for Duty Rule: "Section 26.207(d)

[Plant emergencies]

adds the potential to temporarily waive the requirements of § 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's emergency plan." ..... "Plant emergencies are extraordinary circumstances that may be most effectively addressed through staff augmentation that can only be practically achieved through the use of work hours in excess of the limits of § 26.205(c) and (d). The objective of the temporary exemption is to ensure that the control of work hours and management of worker fatigue do not impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to a plant emergency and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. At the conclusion of the declared emergency, the rule would require licensees to again comply with the work hour controls."}

} Federal Register, Volume 73, Number 62, Page 17148, March 31, 2008.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 14 The St. Lucie Emergency Plan requires the following declarations of emergencies in response topotentially destructive winds.

ClassificationUnusual Event Emergency Action LevelConfirmed hurricane warning is in effect AlertConfirmed hurricane warning is in effect and winds are expected to exceed 175 mph within the Owner Controlled Area.Plant not at cold shutdown and a confirmed hurricane warning is in effect and winds are expected to exceed 194 mph within the OwnerControlled Area.

Site Area Emergency If a hurricane warning is in effect and the storm is projected to reach St. Lucie and/or Martin County as a Category 1 or 2 Hurricane, the Units shall be in Hot Standby (Mode

3) or below at least two (2) hours before the projected onset of sustained hurricane force winds within the Owner Controlled Area and both Units remain off-line for the duration of the hurricane force winds (or restoration of reliable offsite power).

If the storm is projected to reach St. Lucie and/or Martin Country as a Category 3, 4 and 5 Hurricane, the Units are shutdown to a temperature less than 350 degrees TcoId at least two (2)hours before the projected onset of sustained hurricane force winds within the Owner Controlled Area and remain off-line for the duration of the hurricane force winds (or restoration of reliable offsite power).Once a confirmed severe weather/tropical storm watch is in effect, severe weather preparations are commenced.

The St. Lucie Emergency Plan termination criteria from a declared emergency are as follows depending upon the applicable condition:

A. From Recovery Repairs identified during the recovery phase are complete and the plant is ready to return to normal operations.

B. From Alert or Unusual EventThe emergency condition no longer exists and the plant is ready to return to normal operations; or St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 14 The St. Lucie Emergency Plan requires the following declarations of emergencies in response to potentially destructive winds. Classification Emergency Action Level Unusual Event Confirmed hurricane warning is in effect Alert Confirmed hurricane warning is in effect and winds are expected to exceed 175 mph within the Owner Controlled Area. Site Area Emergency Plant not at cold shutdown and a confirmed hurricane warning is in effect and winds are expected to exceed 194 mph within the Owner Controlled Area. If a hurricane warning is in effect and the storm is projected to reach St. Lucie and/or Martin County as a Category 1 or 2 Hurricane, the Units shall be in Hot Standby (Mode 3) or below at least two (2) hours before the projected onset of sustained hurricane force winds within the Owner Controlled Area and both Units remain off-line for the duration of the hurricane force winds (or restoration of reliable offsite power). If the storm is projected to reach St. Lucie and/or Martin Country as a Category 3, 4 and 5 Hurricane, the Units are shutdown to a temperature less than 350 degrees Tcold at least two (2) hours before the projected onset of sustained hurricane force winds within the Owner Controlled Area and remain off-line for the duration ofthe hurricane force winds (or restoration of reliable offsite power). Once a confirmed severe weather/tropical storm watch is in effect, severe weather preparations are commenced.

The St. Lucie Emergency Plan termination criteria from a declared emergency are as follows depending upon the applicable condition:

A. From Recovery

• Repairs identified during the recovery phase are complete and the plant is ready to return to normal operations.

B. From Alert or Unusual Event

• The emergency condition no longer exists and the plant is ready to return to normal operations; or St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 14The emergency condition no longer exists, repair activities are minor, and the plant is in a stable shutdown mode.After the storm has passed, the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) Recovery Manager is responsible for initiating the recovery, if required.

The recovery plan is complete upon establishing the following criteria: A. The Onsite portion of the recovery phase may be terminated when any of the following items are met:* The plant is ready to return to normal operations, OR* Repair activities are minor, the reactor is subcritical, and the plant is in a stable shutdown mode.B. The Offsite portion of the recovery phase may be terminated when the following is met: All Offsite-related Emergency Plan requirements are met or compensatory measures are in affect and approved by the NRC and FEMA.The criteria are similar to the termination criteria from a declared emergency with the exception that there are offsite recovery phase criteria in recognition that a hurricane can cause severe damage to the infrastructure surrounding the site.For purposes of this exemption request, the following definitions apply: ENTRY CONDITION:

This is the start time when any individual on site who performsduties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 1OCFR will not have to meet the requirements of 1OCFR26.205(c) and (d). This occurs when site preparations are commenced per the severe weather preparation procedure (confirmed tropical storm watch, or confirmed hurricane watch or warning).EXIT CONDITION:

This is the time when St. Lucie must fully comply with the requirements of 1OCFR26.205(c) and (d) following severe weather involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. This date and time is determined by the Hurricane Response Coordinator when sufficient personnel who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 1OCFR are available to meet the requirements of 1OCFR26.205(c) and (d).HURRICANE RESPONSE COORDINATOR: The Plant General Manager or his designee is responsible for overseeing hurricane preparations and response activities. This person is a qualified Emergency Coordinator for the St. Lucie Emergency Plan.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 14

• The emergency condition no longer exists, repair activities are minor, and the plant is in a stable shutdown mode. After the storm has passed, the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF) Recovery Manager is responsible for initiating the recovery, if required.

The recovery plan is complete upon establishing the following criteria:

A. The Onsite portion of the recovery phase may be terminated when any of the following items are met:

• The plant is ready to return to normal operations, OR

• Repair activities are minor, the reactor is subcritical, and the plant is in a stable shutdown mode. B. The Offsite portion of the recovery phase may be terminated when the following is met:

• All Offsite-related Emergency Plan requirements are met or compensatory measures are in affect and approved by the NRC and FEMA. The criteria are similar to the termination criteria from a declared emergency with the exception that there are offsite recovery phase criteria in recognition that a hurricane can cause severe damage to the infrastructure surrounding the site. For purposes of this exemption request, the following definitions apply: ENTRY CONDITION:

This is the start time when any individual on site who performs duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 10CFR will not have to meet the requirements of 10CFR26.205(c) and (d). This occurs when site preparations are commenced per the severe weather preparation procedure (confirmed tropical storm watch, or confirmed hurricane watch or warning).

EXIT CONDITION:

This is the time when St. Lucie must fully comply with the requirements of 10CFR26.205(c) and (d) following severe weather involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. This date and time is determined by the Hurricane Response Coordinator when sufficient personnel who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 10CFR are available to meet the requirements of 10CFR26.205(c) and (d). HURRICANE RESPONSE COORDINATOR:

The Plant General Manager or his designee is responsible for overseeing hurricane preparations and response activities.

This person is a qualified Emergency Coordinator for the St. Lucie Emergency Plan.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 14 The entry condition is a clearly defined condition based on the predicted forecast by the NationalWeather Service.

The exit condition is clearly defined as the condition when sufficient personnel are available to meet the work hour requirements.

The time that this condition occurs can not be based on such conditions as (1) a period of time after the storm has passed, (2) the plant is ready to restart, (3)or roads and surrounding infrastructure support a return to the area by relief personnel.

The condition to achieve is that sufficient personnel are available to meet the work hour requirements. The station will be making every effort to re-establish this condition working through many possible variables.

The Hurricane Response Coordinator is in the best position to make this determination.

During the period that St. Lucie is requesting to be exempt from Parts 26.205(c) and (d), St.Lucie may meet the conditions for entering the Emergency Plan. Since Part 26.207(d) already states that licensees need not meet the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, there is no need for exemption for storm crew members during the period of the declared emergency. However, this exemption should be applied to the period established by the entry and exit conditions defined above regardless whether the Emergency Plan is entered or not.Activation of the storm crew could occur more than once a year and could last over several days.Nevertheless in the last five years at St. Lucie, severe weather preparation and augmented storm crew staffing has occurred for hurricanes (Francis, Jeanne, and Wilma) and one tropical storm (Fay). The longest a storm crew was activated was for 10 days.4.0 Analysis The impact of severe weather involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds on nuclear power plant operations is difficult to predict. The unpredictability of the path and speed of advance of the storm could result in a short-notice manning of the storm crew without the ability to adhere to work hour controls. The plant may meet the criteria for declaring an emergency, as defined in the licensee's Emergency Plan, or may not meet the criteria.

In either case, emergency preparedness would require the implementation of the site hurricane plan and the manning of the storm crew. After the storm has passed, offsite infrastructure damage may occur that would complicate and delay the ability of providing relief crews to storm crew personnel maintained onsite.The impact on personnel manning for implementation of the site hurricane staffing and severe weather preparations is similar to entering the Emergency Plan. Plant staff resources are necessary to prepare for and respond to a tropical storm or hurricane threat that could escalate to a declared plant emergency.

In addition, manning for a tropical storm or hurricane threat is complicated by the inability to readily move relief crews on and off site during the tropical storm or hurricane threat or after the passing of the storm depending on surrounding infrastructure damage. Implementation of the hurricane plan is an extraordinary circumstance that is most effectively addressed through staff augmentation that can only be practically achieved through the use of work hours in excess of the limits of § 26.205(c) and (d). The control of work hours St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 14 The entry condition is a clearly defined condition based on the predicted forecast by the National Weather Service. The exit condition is clearly defined as the condition when sufficient personnel are available to meet the work hour requirements.

The time that this condition occurs can not be based on such conditions as (1) a period of time after the storm has passed, (2) the plant is ready to restart, (3) or roads and surrounding infrastructure support a return to the area by relief personnel.

The condition to achieve is that sufficient personnel are available to meet the work hour requirements.

The station will be making every effort to re-establish this condition working through many possible variables.

The Hurricane Response Coordinator is in the best position to make this determination.

During the period that St. Lucie is requesting to be exempt from Parts 26.205(c) and (d), St. Lucie may meet the conditions for entering the Emergency Plan. Since Part 26.207(d) already states that licensees need not meet the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, there is no need for exemption for storm crew members during the period of the declared emergency.

However, this exemption should be applied to the period established by the entry and exit conditions defined above regardless whether the Emergency Plan is entered or not. Activation of the storm crew could occur more than once a year and could last over several days. Nevertheless in the last five years at St. Lucie, severe weather preparation and augmented storm crew staffing has occurred for hurricanes (Francis, Jeanne, and Wilma) and one tropical storm (Fay). The longest a storm crew was activated was for 10 days. 4.0 Analysis The impact of severe weather involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds on nuclear power plant operations is difficult to predict. The unpredictability of the path and speed of advance of the storm could result in a short-notice manning of the storm crew without the ability to adhere to work hour controls.

The plant may meet the criteria for declaring an emergency, as defined in the licensee's Emergency Plan, or may not meet the criteria.

In either case, emergency preparedness would require the implementation of the site hurricane plan and the manning of the storm crew. After the storm has passed, offsite infrastructure damage may occur that would complicate and delay the ability of providing relief crews to storm crew personnel maintained onsite. The impact on personnel manning for implementation of the site hurricane staffing and severe weather preparations is similar to entering the Emergency Plan. Plant staff resources are necessary to prepare for and respond to a tropical storm or hurricane threat that could escalate to a declared plant emergency.

In addition, manning for a tropical storm or hurricane threat is complicated by the inability to readily move relief crews on and off site during the tropical storm or hurricane threat or after the passing ofthe storm depending on surrounding infrastructure damage. Implementation of the hurricane plan is an extraordinary circumstance that is most effectively addressed through staff augmentation that can only be practically achieved through the use of work hours in excess of the limits of § 26.205(c) and (d). The control of work hours St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment I Page 8 of 14 should not impede the ability to ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status.The exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring the sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. St. Lucie would not need to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time entry conditions are met as defined in Section 3 above until the time the exit conditions are met defined in Section 3 above.The senior management official at St. Lucie acting in the capacity similar to the Emergency Coordinator, as defined in the St. Lucie Emergency Plan, is designated as the Hurricane Response Coordinator in the St. Lucie hurricane staffing procedure.

This individual is qualified as an Emergency Coordinator in the ERO.Although an exemption from meeting all the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during severe weather preparation and storm crew activation is requested, opportunities for restorative sleep will be maintained. The hurricane plan provides for bunking facilities in the protected areaand/or power block for the off-crew.

Hence, it is expected that crews will be allowed a 12-hour break between successive work periods. Sufficient numbers of management and supervision are available on the storm crew to provide additional oversight for monitoring the effects of fatigue to ensure that the safety and security of the facility are maintained.

In addition, it is anticipated that the work hour limits of Part 26.205(d)(1) will be maintained.

Meeting rule requirements specified in Parts 26.205(d)(2)(ii) and 26.205(d)(3) is considered the primary challenge.

Nevertheless, the storm crew may be faced with unforeseen challenges where it is prudent torequest that St. Lucie be exempt from meeting all the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)during storm crew activation to ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status.The adequacy of the current hurricane plan procedures was reviewed.

The following aspectswere analyzed." Do the procedures provide guidance for site preparation, staffing, and sequestering the storm crews?Yes. The hurricane plan provides guidance on preparing the site for severe weather and staffing the typical storm crew roster.* Does the procedure address shifts and rest opportunities?

Yes. The hurricane staffing procedure provides for two 12-hour shifts of personnel plus an augmented Emergency Response Organization.

The procedure delineates the location of bunking facilities within the protected area and/or power block for restorative rest for the off-shift crew.St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 14 should not impede the ability to ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. The exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring the sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. St. Lucie would not need to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time entry conditions are met as defined in Section 3 above until the time the exit conditions are met defined in Section 3 above. The senior management official at St. Lucie acting in the capacity similar to the Emergency Coordinator, as defined in the St. Lucie Emergency Plan, is designated as the Hurricane Response Coordinator in the St. Lucie hurricane staffing procedure.

This individual is qualified as an Emergency Coordinator in the ERO. Although an exemption from meeting all the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during severe weather preparation and storm crew activation is requested, opportunities for restorative sleep will be maintained.

The hurricane plan provides for bunking facilities in the protected area and/or power block for the off-crew.

Hence, it is expected that crews will be allowed a 12-hour break between successive work periods. Sufficient numbers of management and supervision are available on the storm crew to provide additional oversight for monitoring the effects of fatigue to ensure that the safety and security ofthe facility are maintained.

In addition, it is anticipated that the work hour limits of Part 26.205(d)(1) will be maintained.

Meeting rule requirements specified in Parts 26.205(d)(2)(ii) and 26.205(d)(3) is considered the primary challenge.

Nevertheless, the storm crew may be faced with unforeseen challenges where it is prudent to request that St. Lucie be exempt from meeting all the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during storm crew activation to ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. The adequacy of the current hurricane plan procedures was reviewed.

The following aspects were analyzed.

• Do the procedures provide guidance for site preparation, staffing, and sequestering the storm crews? Yes. The hurricane plan provides guidance on preparing the site for severe weather and staffing the typical storm crew roster.

• Does the procedure address shifts and rest opportunities?

Yes. The hurricane staffing procedure provides for two 12-hour shifts of personnel plus an augmented Emergency Response Organization.

The procedure delineates the location of bunking facilities within the protected area and/or power block for restorative rest for the off-shift crew.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217Docket Nos.

50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 14* Does the procedure provide for rest of the storm crew prior to sequestering the crew?No.Other options rather than requesting an exemption from the Fatigue Management Rule were considered.

1. Waivers The Fatigue Management Rule allows licensees to grant waivers of the work hour controls.To grant a waiver, an operations shift manager determines that the waiver is necessary to mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety, or a security shift manager determines that the waiver is necessary to maintain site security, or site senior-level manager with requisite signature authority makes either determination.

A supervisor assesses the individual face-to-face and determines that there is reasonable assurance that the individual will be able to safely and competently perform assigned duties during the additional work period for which the waiver will be granted. The supervisor must receive specific training and the bases forindividual waivers must be documented.

The face-to-face supervisor assessment may not be performed more than 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> before the individual begins performing any work under the waiver. There is no specified time for how long a waiver is effective, but from the requirements it is clear it is intended for a specific work activity, and not intended for large groups of personnel performing a number of activities.

It is estimated that the completion of a single waiver would require approximately twenty minutes. If a waiver is performed every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and considering that approximately 150 waivers would be required (see discussion on Option 3 below), approximately 50 man-hours would be required every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to complete this process. In addition, the process would be perfunctory because minimum manning requirements for ensuring the safety and security of the facility would necessitate a conclusion to approve the waiver. This is an impractical method to meet the Rule. Management focus on fatigue monitoring, without the distraction of processing waivers, is a more effective method.The storm crew could be activated for a number of days. From the above requirements for granting a waiver, use of waivers is an impractical option for meeting the Fatigue Management Rule for controlling work hours because a large number of covered workers are impacted by the severe weather condition.

The waiver option, in these circumstances, wouldimpede the ability to focus on plant safety and security and may be detrimental to the healthand safety of the public.

2. Allow for day off for storm crew personnel during sequestering The strategy of allowing members of the storm crew to take a day off while sequestered to the site during storm crew activation was considered.

Essentially, an individual would not be assigned any duties for the licensee during that day to facilitate meeting the requirements of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 14

• Does the procedure provide for rest of the storm crew prior to sequestering the crew? No. Other options rather than requesting an exemption from the Fatigue Management Rule were considered.

1. Waivers The Fatigue Management Rule allows licensees to grant waivers of the work hour controls.

To grant a waiver, an operations shift manager determines that the waiver is necessary to mitigate or prevent a condition adverse to safety, or a security shift manager determines that the waiver is necessary to maintain site security, or site senior-level manager with requisite signature authority makes either determination.

A supervisor assesses the individual face and determines that there is reasonable assurance that the individual will be able to safely and competently perform assigned duties during the additional work period for which the waiver will be granted. The supervisor must receive specific training and the bases for individual waivers must be documented.

The face-to-face supervisor assessment may not be performed more than 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> before the individual begins performing any work under the waiver. There is no specified time for how long a waiver is effective, but from the requirements it is clear it is intended for a specific work activity, and not intended for large groups of personnel performing a number of activities.

It is estimated that the completion of a single waiver would require approximately twenty minutes. If a waiver is performed every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and considering that approximately 150 waivers would be required (see discussion on Option 3 below), approximately 50 man-hours would be required every 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to complete this process. In addition, the process would be perfunctory because minimum manning requirements for ensuring the safety and security of the facility would necessitate a conclusion to approve the waiver. This is an impractical method to meet the Rule. Management focus on fatigue monitoring, without the distraction of processing waivers, is a more effective method. The storm crew could be activated for a number of days. From the above requirements for granting a waiver, use of waivers is an impractical option for meeting the Fatigue Management Rule for controlling work hours because a large number of covered workers are impacted by the severe weather condition.

The waiver option, in these circumstances, would impede the ability to focus on plant safety and security and may be detrimental to the health and safety of the public. 2. Allow for day off for storm crew personnel during sequestering The strategy of allowing members of the storm crew to take a day off while sequestered to the site during storm crew activation was considered.

Essentially, an individual would not be assigned any duties for the licensee during that day to facilitate meeting the requirements of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 14 Part 26.205(d)(2)(ii) and 26.205(d)(3). This option would only be available to a few members of our storm crew. For example, as stated in the following paragraph, Operations and Security would not be able to take advantage of this. Also, the option could beincreasingly limited based on the severity of the storm and the response required.3. Increase staffing for site preparation and storm crew manning The minimum storm crew at St. Lucie consists of more than 160 personnel from operations,security, maintenance, health physics, chemistry, and ERO personnel.

Additional personnel are on-shift for the timeframe immediately preceding a tropical storm or hurricane to make the station ready for the impending weather.

The storm crew including the ERO is already a large population of individuals. Bunking and sanitary facilities are limited on site to accommodate this population of people and provide the opportunity for restorative sleep. Operations and Security are limiting groups.

One additional crew for these two organizations would require approximately 60 additional personnel to be sequestered on site. Simply adding additional personnel to the storm crew to meet work hour controls is not practical.

The additional people would still require the use ofeither Option I or Option 2. In addition, exposing additional personnel to the dangers ofdealing with a tropical storm or hurricane as well as creating hardships on additional familiesto accommodate the rule is not reasonable.

4. Other regulatory processes Rulemaking is a possible resolution path. Rulemaking will not meet the more immediate needs of St. Lucie. With the tropical storm season in progress, this request for an exemption is needed in the short term to provide the St. Lucie facility with the flexibility for managing a tropical storm or hurricane threat and personnel fatigue. FPL is engaged with industry stakeholders in addressing this issue on a generic basis.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 14 Part 26.205(d)(2)(ii) and 26.205(d)(3).

This option would pnly be available to a few members of our storm crew. For example, as stated in the following paragraph, Operations and Security would not be able to take advantage of this. Also, the option could be increasingly limited based on the severity of the storm and the response required.

3. Increase staffing for site preparation and storm crew manning The minimum storm crew at St. Lucie consists of more than 160 personnel from operations, security, maintenance, health physics, chemistry, and ERO personnel.

Additional personnel are on-shift for the timeframe immediately preceding a tropical storm or hurricane to make the station ready for the impending weather. The storm crew including the ERO is already a large population of individuals.

Bunking and sanitary facilities are limited on site to accommodate this population of people and provide the opportunity for restorative sleep. Operations and Security are limiting groups. One additional crew for these two organizations would require approximately 60 additional personnel to be sequestered on site. Simply adding additional personnel to the storm crew to meet work hour controls is not practical.

The additional people would still require the use of either Option 1 or Option 2. In addition, exposing additional personnel to the dangers of dealing with a tropical storm or hurricane as well as creating hardships on additional families to accommodate the rule is not reasonable.

4. Other regulatory processes Rulemaking is a possible resolution path. Rulemaking will not meet the more immediate needs of St. Lucie. With the tropical storm season in progress, this request for an exemption is needed in the short term to provide the St. Lucie facility with the flexibility for managing a tropical storm or hurricane threat and personnel fatigue. FPL is engaged with industry stakeholders in addressing this issue on a genedc basis.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 14 5.0 Precedence There is no precedent for this kind of an exemption request because the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue is a new rule that is required to be implemented by October 1, 2009.Although a number of licensees have sequestered crews during tropical storm and hurricane conditions, the standard technical specifications for work hour controls did not impose the more restrictive requirements of the new Rule that are the subject of this exemption request.NUREG-1471, "Effect of Hurricane Andrew on the Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station form August 20 -30, 1992," March 1993 was reviewed.

This event resulted in the invocation of the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(x) that allows senior licensed personnel to take reasonable action that departs from a license condition or technical specification in an emergency when this action is immediately needed to protect the plant and the public safety and when no action consistent with license conditions and technical specifications that can give adequate and equivalent protection is immediately apparent. This provision was invoked by Turkey Point to relocate fire watch and security personnel for their personal safety during the hurricane. The report did not indicate that regulatory relief was required to extend work hours beyond limits.

St. Lucie has experienced hurricane and tropical force winds onsite several times in the recentpast (Hurricanes Frances, Jean, and Wilma, Tropical Storm Fey). Each storm required site preparation for severe weather and staffing of the supplemental hurricane crews. At the time, St.Lucie did not require regulatory relief to extend work hours beyond limits.6.0 Justification of Exemption 10 CFR 26.9, "Specific exemptions," states that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission may grant exemptions from the requirements of this part provided:

• The exemption is authorized by law;" The exemption will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security;and* The exemption is otherwise in the public interest.The exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring the sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. St. Lucie would not need to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time that storm crew sequestering entry conditions are met and until exit conditions are satisfied.

The exemption would only apply to individuals on the storm crew who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 1OCFR. When storm crew sequestering exit conditions are met, full compliance with 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) will be required.St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 5.0 Precedence L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 11 of14 There is no precedent for this kind of an exemption request because the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue is a new rule that is required to be implemented by October 1,2009. Although a number of licensees have sequestered crews during tropical storm and hurricane conditions, the standard technical specifications for work hour controls did not impose the more restrictive requirements of the new Rule that are the subject of this exemption request. NUREG-1471, "Effect of Hurricane Andrew on the Turkey Point Nuclear Generating Station form August 20 -30, 1992," March 1993 was reviewed.

This event resulted in the invocation of the provisions of 10 CFR 50.54(x) that allows senior licensed personnel to take reasonable action that departs from a license condition or technical specification in an emergency when this action is immediately needed to protect the plant and the public safety and when no action consistent with license conditions and technical specifications that can give adequate and equivalent protection is immediately apparent.

This provision was invoked by Turkey Point to relocate fire watch and security personnel for their personal safety during the hurricane.

The report did not indicate that regulatory relief was required to extend work hours beyond limits. St. Lucie has experienced hurricane and tropical force winds onsite several times in the recent past (Hurricanes Frances, Jean, and Wilma, Tropical Storm Fey). Each storm required site preparation for severe weather and staffing of the supplemental hurricane crews. At the time, St. Lucie did not require regulatory relief to extend work hours beyond limits. 6.0 Justification of Exemption 10 CFR 26.9, "Specific exemptions," states that.the Nuclear Regulatory Commission may grant exemptions from the requirements of this part provided:

• The exemption is authorized by law;

• The exemption will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security; and

• The exemption is otherwise in the public interest.

The exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring the sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. St. Lucie would not need to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time that storm crew sequestering entry conditions are met and until exit conditions are satisfied.

The exemption would only apply to individuals on the storm crew who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(l) through (a)(5) of lOCFR. When storm crew sequestering exit conditions are met, full compliance with 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) will be required.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217Docket Nos.

50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 14 The criteria are satisfied as described below: 1. This exemption is authorized by law.The NRC has the authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, to grant exemptions from its regulations if doing so would not violate the requirements of law.This exemption is authorized by law. The provisions of 10 CFR 26 were adopted at the discretion of the Commission consistent with its statutory authority.

No statute required the NRC to adopt the specific provisions from which St. Lucie seeks an exemption.

Rather, the NRC may determine that alternative means are adequate to provide reasonable assurance of safety.2. This exemption will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.The Fatigue Management Rule allows for licensees not meeting the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's emergency plan. This exemption expands that allowance for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds that may or may not result in the declaration of an emergency.

Although work hour controls would not need to be met during storm crewactivation, sufficient manning is available to provide for restorative sleep of the shift crews. Additionally, sufficient numbers of management and supervision are available onthe storm crew to provide additional oversight for monitoring the effects of fatigueensuring the safety and security of the facility.

Therefore, this exemption will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.3. This exemption is otherwise in the public interest.This exemption request will only expand an exception already provided in the Fatigue Management Rule during declared emergencies to circumstances where severe weather conditions due to tropical storm or hurricane force winds require preparing the site for severe weather and the manning of facility storm crews. The exemption would seldom be needed. However, in a unique set of circumstances the exemption would be necessary to ensure that the control of work hours and management of worker fatigue does not impede the ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to the severe weather threat, ensuring that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. Therefore, the focus will be on nuclear safety and security and thus in the interest of public health and safety.7.0 Environmental Assessment Identification of the Proposed ActionThis proposed exemption would allow St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 relief from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during preparation for severe weather St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 The criteria are satisfied as described below: 1. This exemption is authorized by law. L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 14 The NRC has the authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, to grant exemptions from its regulations if doing so would not violate the requirements oflaw. This exemption is authorized by law. The provisions of 10 CFR 26 were adopted at the discretion of the Commission consistent with its statutory authority.

No statute required the NRC to adopt the specific provisions from which St. Lucie seeks an exemption.

Rather, the NRC may determine that alternative means are adequate to provide reasonable assurance of safety. 2. This exemption will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.

The Fatigue Management Rule allows for licensees not meeting the requirements of Parts 26.205(c) and (d) during declared emergencies, as defined in the licensee's emergency plan. This exemption expands that allowance for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds that mayor may not result in the declaration of an emergency.

Although work hour controls would not need to be met during storm crew activation, sufficient manning is available to provide for restorative sleep of the shift crews. Additionally, sufficient numbers of management and supervision are available on the storm crew to provide additional oversight for monitoring the effects of fatigue ensuring the safety and security ofthe facility.

Therefore, this exemption will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.

3. This exemption is otherwise in the public interest.

This exemption request will only expand an exception already provided in the Fatigue Management Rule during declared emergencies to circumstances where severe weather conditions due to tropical storm or hurricane force winds require preparing the site for severe weather and the manning of facility storm crews. The exemption would seldom be needed. However, in a unique set of circumstances the exemption would be necessary to ensure that the control of work hours and management of worker fatigue does not impede the ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to the severe weather threat, ensuring that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. Therefore, the focus will be on nuclear safety and security and thus in the interest of public health and safety. 7.0 Environmental Assessment Identification of the Proposed Action This proposed exemption would allow St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 relief from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during preparation for severe weather St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 14 conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. The exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring severe weather preparations and activation and sequestering of the St. Lucie storm crew. St. Lucie would not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from the time severe weather site preparation begins until exit conditions are satisfied. The exemption would only apply to individuals on the storm crew who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 10 CFR.Need for the Proposed Action Severe weather preparations and augmented staffing for coping with tropical storms and hurricanes begin well in advance of the declaration of an Unusual Event and entry into an Emergency Plan Action Level. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain relief from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during preparation for severeweather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds, and after the severe weather conditions involving a tropical storm or hurricane until sufficient personnel are available to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d). The proposed exemption is necessary to ensure that the control of work hours and management of worker fatigue does not impede the ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to the severe weather threat and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status.Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The proposed exemption expands that allowance for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds that may or may not result in the declaration of an emergency.

Although work hour controls would not need to be met during storm crew activation, sufficient manning is available to provide for restorative sleep of the shift crews.Additionally, sufficient numbers of management and supervision are available on the storm crewto provide additional oversight for monitoring the effects of fatigue ensuring the safety and security of the facility.The proposed exemption will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents.

No changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released off site, and there is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure.

Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.Accordingly, granting the proposed exemption would result in no significant radiological environmental impact.With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed action does not have the potential to affect any historic sites. It does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.

Accordingly, FPL concludes that there are nosignificant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 14 conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds. The exemption would only apply to severe weather conditions where tropical storm or hurricane force winds are predicted onsite requiring severe weather preparations and activation and sequestering ofthe St. Lucie storm crew. St. Lucie would not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205( c) and (d) from the time severe weather site preparation begins until exit conditions are satisfied.

The exemption would only apply to individuals on the storm crew who perform duties identified in Parts 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(5) of 10 CFR. Need for the Proposed Action Severe weather preparations and augmented staffing for coping with tropical storms and hurricanes begin well in advance ofthe declaration of an Unusual Event and entry into an Emergency Plan Action Level. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain relief from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205( c) and (d) from meeting work hour controls during preparation for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds, and after the severe weather conditions involving a tropical storm or hurricane until sufficient personnel are available to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d). The proposed exemption is necessary to ensure that the control of work hours and management of worker fatigue does not impede the ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to the severe weather threat and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The proposed exemption expands that allowance for severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds that mayor may not result in the declaration of an emergency.

Although work hour controls would not need to be met during storm crew activation, sufficient manning is available to provide for restorative sleep of the shift crews. Additionally, sufficient numbers of management and supervision are available on the storm crew to provide additional oversight for monitoring the effects of fatigue ensuring the safety and security of the facility.

The proposed exemption will not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents.

No changes are being made in the types of effluents that may be released off site, and there is no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure.

Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Accordingly, granting the proposed exemption would result in no significant radiological environmental impact. With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed action does not have the potential to affect any historic sites. It does not affect non-radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Accordingly, FPL concludes that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 1 Page 14 of 14 Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed ActionThe alternative to the proposed action would be denial of the proposed action (i.e., a "no-action" alternative).

Denial of the proposed exemption would result in no change in current environmental impacts. Therefore, the environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.Alternative Use of Resources The proposed action does not involve the use of any different resources than those, previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of the St. Lucie Plant.8.0 Conclusion The requested exemption from meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during severe weather preparations and storm crew activation in response to a tropical storm or hurricane threatening the site is justified to ensure that work hour controls do not impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to a severeweather threat and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. Entry and exit into the condition where the exemption will apply will be determined by a station senior manager qualified as Emergency Coordinator in the site Emergency Plan. Management and Supervision will provide additional oversight of personnel for signs of fatigue to ensure that safety and security of the facility is maintained.

Upon de-activation of the storm crew, St. Lucie would again comply with the work hour controls.As required by 10 CFR 26.9, the requested exemption is authorized by law, will not endangerlife or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.

There are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action L-2009-217 Attachment 1 Page 14 of 14 The alternative to the proposed action would be denial of the proposed action (i.e., a "no-action" alternative).

Denial of the proposed exemption would result in no change in current environmental impacts. Therefore, the environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar. Alternative Use of Resources The proposed action does not involve the use of any different resources than those, previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation ofthe St. Lucie Plant. 8.0 Conclusion The requested exemption from meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) during severe weather preparations and storm crew activation in response to a tropical storm or hurricane threatening the site is justified to ensure that work hour controls do not impede a licensee's ability to use whatever staff resources may be necessary to respond to a severe weather threat and ensure that the plant reaches and maintains a safe and secure status. Entry and exit into the condition where the exemption will apply will be determined by a station senior manager qualified as Emergency Coordinator in the site Emergency Plan. Management and Supervision will provide additional oversight of personnel for signs of fatigue to ensure that safety and security ofthe facility is maintained.

Upon de-activation of the storm crew, St. Lucie would again comply with the work hour controls.

As required by 10 CFR 26.9, the requested exemption is authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.

There are no significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 2 Page 1 of3 Attachment 2 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d)St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 2 10 CFR 26.205( c) and (d) L-2009-217 Attachment 2 Page 1 of3 St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217Docket Nos.

50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 3§ 26.205 Work hours (c) Work hours scheduling.

Licensees shall schedule the work hours of individuals who are subject to this section consistent with the objective of preventing impairment from fatigue due to the duration, frequency, or sequencing of successive shifts.(d) Work hour controls.

Licensees shall control the work hours of individuals who are subject to this section.(1-) Except as permitted in § 26.207, licensees shall ensure that any individual's work hours do not exceed the following limits: (i) 16 work hours in any 24-hour period;(ii) 26 work hours in any 48-hour period; and (iii) 72 work hours in any 7-day period.(2) Licensees shall ensure that individuals have, at a minimum, the rest breaks specified in this paragraph.

For the purposes of this subpart, a break is defined as an interval of time that falls between successive work periods, during which the individual does not perform any duties for the licensee other than one period of shift turnover at either the beginning or end of a shift but not both. Except as permitted in § 26.207, licensees shall ensure that individuals have, at a minimum-(i) A 10-hour break between successive work periods or an 8-hour break between successive work periods when a break of less than 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> is necessary to accommodate a crew's scheduled transition between work schedules or shifts;and (ii) A 34-hour break in any 9-day period.(3) Licensees shall ensure that individuals have, at a minimum, the number of days off specified in this paragraph. For the purposes of this subpart, a day off is defined as a calendar day during which an individual does not start a work shift. For the purposes of calculating the average number of days off required in this paragraph, the duration of the shift cycle may not exceed 6 weeks.(i) Individuals who are working 8-hour shift schedules shall have at least 1 day off per week, averaged over the shift cycle;(ii) Individuals who are working 10-hour shift schedules shall have at least 2 days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle;St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 § 26.205 Work hours L-2009-217 Attachment 2 Page 2 of3 (c) Work hours scheduling.

Licensees shall schedule the work hours of individuals who are subject to this section consistent with the objective of preventing impairment from fatigue due to the duration, frequency, or sequencing of successive shifts. (d) Work hour controls.

Licensees shall control the work hours of individuals who are subject to this section. (1") Except as permitted in § 26.207, licensees shall ensure that any individual's work hours do not exceed the following limits: (i) 16 work hours in any 24-hour period; (ii) 26 work hours in any 48-hour period; and (iii) 72 work hours in any 7-day period. (2) Licensees shall ensure that individuals have, at a minimum, the rest breaks specified in this paragraph.

For the purposes of this subpart, a break is defined as an interval of time that falls between successive work periods, during which the individual does not perform any duties for the licensee other than one period of shift turnover at either the beginning or end of a shift but not both. Except as permitted in §26.207, licensees shall ensure that individuals have, at a minimum-(i) A 10-hour break between successive work periods or an 8-hour break between successive work periods when a break of less than 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> is necessary to accommodate a crew's scheduled transition between work schedules or shifts; and (ii) A 34-hour break in any 9-day period. (3) Licensees shall ensure that individuals have, at a minimum, the number of days off specified in this paragraph.

For the purposes of this subpart, a day off is defined as a calendar day during which an individual does not start a work shift. For the purposes of calculating the average number of days off required in this paragraph, the duration of the shift cycle may not exceed 6 weeks. (i) Individuals who are working 8-hour shift schedules shall have at least 1 day off per week, averaged over the shift cycle; (ii) Individuals who are working 10-hour shift schedules shall have at least 2 days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle; St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 L-2009-217 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 2 Page 3 of 3 (iii) Individuals who are working 12-hour shift schedules while performing the duties described in § 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(3) shall have at least 2.5 days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle;(iv) Individuals who are working 12-hour shift schedules while performing theduties described in § 26.4(a)(4) shall have at least 2 days off per week, averagedover the shift cycle; and (v) Individuals who are working 12-hour shift schedules while performing the duties described in § 26.4(a)(5) shall have at least 3 days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle.(4) During the first 60 days of a unit outage, licensees need not meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(3) of this section for individuals specified in § 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(4), while those individuals are working on outage activities.

However, the licensee shall ensure that the individuals specified in § 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(3) have at least 3 days off in each successive (i.e., non-rolling) 15-day period and that the individuals specified in § 26.4(a)(4) have at least 1 day off in any 7-day period;(5) During the first 60 days of a unit outage, security system outage, or increased threatcondition, licensees shall control the hours worked by individuals specified in§ 26.4(a)(5) as follows: (i) During the first 60 days of a unit outage or a planned security system outage, licensees need not meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(3) of this section.However, licensees shall ensure that these individuals have at least 4 days off in each successive (i.e., non-rolling) 15-day period; and (ii) During the first 60 days of an unplanned security system outage or increased threat condition, licensees need not meet the requirements of either paragraph (d)(3) or (d)(5)(i) of this section.

(6) The 60-day periods in paragraphs (d)(4) and (d)(5) of this section may be extendedfor each individual in 7-day increments for each non-overlapping 7-day period the individual has worked not more than 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> during the unit or security system outage or increased threat condition, as applicable.

St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. SO-33S and SO-389 L-2009-2I7 Attachment 2 Page 3 of3 (iii) Individuals who are working I2-hour shift schedules while performing the duties described in § 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(3) shall have at least 2.S days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle; (iv) Individuals who are working I2-hour shift schedules while performing the duties described in § 26.4(a)( 4) shall have at least 2 days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle; and (v) Individuals who are working 12-hour shift schedules while performing the duties described in § 26.4(a)(5) shall have at least 3 days off per week, averaged over the shift cycle. (4) During the first 60 days of a unit outage, licensees need not meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(3) of this section for individuals specified in § 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(4), while those individuals are working on outage activities.

However, the licensee shall ensure that the individuals specified in § 26.4(a)(1) through (a)(3) have ,at least 3 days off in each successive (i.e., non-rolling)

I5-day period and that the individuals specified in § 26.4(a)( 4) have at least I day off in any 7-day period; (S) During the first 60 days of a unit outage, security system outage, or increased threat condition, licensees shall control the hours worked by individuals specified in § 26.4(a)(5) as follows: (i) During the first 60 days of a unit outage or a plamied security system outage, licensees need not meet the requirements of paragraph (d)(3) of this section. However, licensees shall ensure that these individuals have at least 4 days off in each successive (i.e., non-rolling)

IS-day period; and (ii) During the first 60 days of an unplanned security system outage or increased threat condition, licensees need not meet the requirements of either paragraph (d)(3) or (d)(S)(i) of this section. (6) The 60-day periods in paragraphs (d)( 4) and (d)( 5) of this section may be extended for each individual in 7-day increments for each non-overlapping 7-day period the individual has worked not more than 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> during the unit or security system outage or increased threat condition, as applicable.

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217Attachment 3 Page 1 of2 Attachment 3 Licensee Commitment St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Attachment 3 Licensee Commitment L-2009-217 Attachment 3 Page 1 of2 St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 L-2009-217 Attachment 3 Page 2 of 2 Commitment The following table identifies the actions in this document to which St. Lucie has committed.

Statements in this submittal with the exception of those in the table below are provided for information purposes and are not considered commitments.

Please direct questions regardingthis commitment to Ken Frehafer at (772) 467-7748.Commitment Expected Completion Date When the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing Fatigue is changed and an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropicalstorm or hurricane force winds is no longer needed, FPL will submit a letter to the NRC stating that the exemption is no longer needed.December 30, 2011** Subject to change based on actual Rule change date St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Commitment L-2009-217 Attachment 3 Page 2 of2 The following table identifies the actions in this document to which St. Lucie has committed.

Statements in this submittal with the exception of those in the table below are provided for information purposes and are not considered commitments.

Please direct questions regarding this commitment to Ken Frehafer at (772) 467-7748.

Commitment Expected Completion Date When the Fitness for Duty Rule for Managing December 30, 20 II

• Fatigue is changed and an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 26.205(c) and (d) for meeting work hour controls during declarations of severe weather conditions involving tropical storm or hurricane force winds is no longer needed, FPL will submit a letter to the NRC stating that the exemption is no longer needed.

• Subject to change based on actual Rule change date