ML020920429
| ML020920429 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/2002 |
| From: | Edison G NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2 |
| To: | Richard Laufer NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2 |
| Edison G E, NRR/DLPM, 415--1448 | |
| References | |
| TAC MB4584 | |
| Download: ML020920429 (4) | |
Text
April 16, 2002 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard J. Laufer, Acting Section Chief, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management FROM: Gordon E. Edison, Senior Project Manager, Section 1/RA/
Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management
SUBJECT:
CONFERENCE CALL WITH VEPCO RE: REACTOR VESSEL HEAD INSPECTION (TAC NO. MB4584)
On March 28, 2002, a conference call was held with Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO). The purpose of the call was to discuss their plans for an inspection of the Surry Unit 2 reactor vessel head during their spring 2002, refueling outage. Participants in the call are listed in the Enclosure. The licensee had previously inspected the head in late November 2001, for evidence of nozzle leakage as a result of NRC Bulletin 2001-01.
The licensee stated they planned to do a 100% qualified visual bare metal inspection of the top of the head within the control rod drive mechanism ventilation shroud in early April 2002. This inspection would assess the general condition of the head and whether the vessel head penetration nozzles had through-wall degradation. They indicated they did not expect to see evidence of leakage (boric acid deposits) on the top of the head because they had inspected the head 4 months earlier and found the head relatively clean.
No ultrasonic or other nondestructive testing is planned unless evidence of leakage is observed. Based on corrosion rate estimates from the Davis-Besse head corrosion, VEPCO projected no significant head corrosion over the next operating cycle (about 18 months) even if leakage began after restart from this outage. The NRC staff had no objections to the licensees testing plans as described; however, the staff indicated that a visual exam for leaking nozzles will only indicate if a nozzle has a through-wall flaw, but will not indicate if a deep partial through-wall flaw exists. VEPCO agreed to hold another conference call after the inspection and prior to restart, to discuss the inspection results with NRC.
Docket No. 50-281
Attachment:
As stated
MEMORANDUM TO: Richard J. Laufer, Acting Section Chief, Section 1 April 16, 2002 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management FROM: Gordon E. Edison, Senior Project Manager, Section 1/RA/
Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management
SUBJECT:
CONFERENCE CALL WITH VEPCO RE: REACTOR VESSEL HEAD INSPECTION (TAC NO. MB4584)
On March 28, 2002, a conference call was held with Virginia Electric and Power Company (VEPCO). The purpose of the call was to discuss their plans for an inspection of the Surry Unit 2 reactor vessel head during their spring 2002, refueling outage. Participants in the call are listed in the Enclosure. The licensee had previously inspected the head in late November 2001, for evidence of nozzle leakage as a result of NRC Bulletin 2001-01.
The licensee stated they planned to do a 100% qualified visual bare metal inspection of the top of the head within the control rod drive mechanism ventilation shroud in early April 2002. This inspection would assess the general condition of the head and whether the vessel head penetration nozzles had through-wall degradation. They indicated they did not expect to see evidence of leakage (boric acid deposits) on the top of the head because they had inspected the head 4 months earlier and found the head relatively clean.
No ultrasonic or other nondestructive testing is planned unless evidence of leakage is observed. Based on corrosion rate estimates from the Davis-Besse head corrosion, VEPCO projected no significant head corrosion over the next operating cycle (about 18 months) even if leakage began after restart from this outage. The NRC staff had no objections to the licensees testing plans as described; however, the staff indicated that a visual exam for leaking nozzles will only indicate if a nozzle has a through-wall flaw, but will not indicate if a deep partial through-wall flaw exists. VEPCO agreed to hold another conference call after the inspection and prior to restart, to discuss the inspection results with NRC.
Docket No. 50-281
Attachment:
As stated Distribution:
PUBLIC EDunnnigton SBloom PDII-1 Reading KKarwoski GEdison RLaufer Accession Number: ML020920429 OFFICE PM:PDII-1 LA:PDII-2 (A)SC:PDII-1 NAME GEdison EDunnington RLaufer DATE 04/05/2002 04/04/2002 04/05/2002 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
PARTICIPATION IN MARCH 28, 2002 RELATED TO REACTOR VESSEL HEAD INSPECTION AT SURRY, UNIT 2 NAME ORGANIZATION Gordon E. Edison NRC/NRR Stephanie Coffin NRC/NRR Ken Karwoski NRC/NRR Jerry Blake NRC/Region II Gerry McCoy NRC/Region II Larry Garner NRC/Region II Leslie Hartz VEPCO (Dominion)
William Matthews VEPCO Richard Blount VEPCO David Heacock VEPCO Toby Sowers VEPCO Bryan Foster VEPCO Jerry Bischof VEPCO Steve Sarver VEPCO Ron Berryman VEPCO Matt Adams VEPCO John Swientoniewski VEPCO Les Spain VEPCO David Sommers VEPCO Ed Brennan VEPCO Michal Small VEPCO Gary Miller VEPCO Jim Bennetch VEPCO Keshab Dwivedy VEPCO